STUART NECHAKO NATURAL RESOURCE DISTRICT
FORESTRY LICENCE TO CUT
SITE PLAN
A. TENURE IDENTIFICATION
LICENCE
#
BLOCK
OPENING
NUMBER
LOCATION
1
Latitude:
Longitude:
Stand Type:
B. AREA UNDER THE PLAN
Gross Area
(TAUP)
PAS (ha)
Rock
Swamp /
wetland
Other NP
(specify)
NCC
Reserves (specify)
NAR
Rationale for exceeding PAS
C. SOIL DISTURBANCE
SU
Max. Allowable Soil Disturbance (%)
Max. Amount TAS May Exceed
MASD Prior To Rehab (%)
Max. Allowable Soil Disturbance
For Roadside Work Areas (%)
Maximum Permanent
Access Structures (%)
25
SU
7
CRITICAL SITE CONDITIONS THAT AFFECT THE TIMING OF OPERATIONS, AND HOW THEY AFFECT THE TIMING
COMMENTS:
D. STOCKING REQUIREMENTS
SU
NAR
FDP
STANDARDS ID #
Other Performance Standards
COMMENTS
E. ADMINISTRATION
RPF'S SIGNATURE and SEAL
RPF PRINTED NAME
DATE SIGNED
I certify that I have reviewed this document and, while I did not personally
supervise the work described, I have determined that this work has been
done to standards acceptable of a Registered Professional Forester.
Map attached forms an integral part of the site plan.
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS ATTACHED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE SITE PLAN
PLANNING
LICENCE #
BLOCK
OPENING
NUMBER
LOCATION
1
1.
ASSESSMENTS
1.1 VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
(was a VAI conducted and the plan is consistent with it’s results and recommendations)
COMMENTS:
1.2 PEST INCIDENCE SURVEY
PEST CODE
INCIDENCE OR RATING
(Was a PIS conducted and the plan is consistent with its results and recommendations)
COMMENTS
1.3 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
DATE
COMMENTS
CONSULTANT
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Was an AIA conducted and does it adequately manage and conserve archaeological(s) site in the plan area)
1.4 TERRAIN STABILITY FIELD, FLAT OVER STEEP, GULLEY AND AVALANCHE ASSESSMENTS
DATE
CONSULTANT
RECOMMENDATIONS
COMMENTS
1.5 RIPARIAN ASSESSMENTS
SU
Riparian
I.D. and
Class.
RMZ
WIDTH
(M)
RRZ (m)
BA or SPH Retained
Comments
(Indicate if in a community watershed)
1.6 SOIL ASSESSMENT
HAZARD RATINGS
SU
Soil
Comp
COMMENTS
Soil
Erosion
Soil Disp
SOIL CHARACTERISTICS
Depth To Unfavourable Subsoil
Min(cm)
Max(cm)
Type Of
Unfavourable
Subsoil
Sediment Delivery Risk
(Community Watersheds)
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS ATTACHED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE SITE PLAN
1.7 SITE DEG CALCULATION.
Block
Gross Cutblock area
(ha)
1
BEC
Gross (ha)
Perm Access
%
Comments
2
3
4
5
6
TOTAL
2
BACK UP DATA
HLP/ FDP CONSIDERATIONS:
COMMENT
Biodiversity Emphasis/ L.U.
Connectivity Corridor
Old Growth Constraints
Green-Up
Fire Maintained Ecosystems
Enhanced Resource Dev. Zones
Grizzly Bear Habitat
Wildlife/ Endangered Species
Sensitive Areas
Watersheds/ Hydro Assessments
Consumptive Use Streams
Fisheries
Recreation
Range
Avalanche Assessments
Other Resources
3
SILVICULTURAL/ HARVEST SYSTEMS
3.1 SILVICULTURAL SYSTEMS
SU
SYSTEM
VARIANT
RESERVE TYPE
Silvicultural Constraints
Harvesting Constraints
3.2 LEAVE TREE SPECIES AND FUNCTIONS
SU
Pref.
Species
Accept
Minimum Leave Tree Characteristics Including Form, Health And Vigour
COMMENTS &
CWD
4
ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Standard
Unit
Ecology
Unit
Area
Zone
Subzone
Variant/
Phase
Site Series (series - %)
Elevation
Min
Max
Avg
Slope
position
Soil
Texture
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS ATTACHED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE SITE PLAN
Stocking Requirements
Assessment Dates
Standard unit
Standards ID
Regen Delay
(yrs)
Freegrow
Early (yrs)
Freegrow Late
(yrs)
SU : Regeneration Layer
Preferred Species
Species
Acceptable Species
Min Hgt (m)
Footnotes
Species
Min Hgt
(m)
Post Spacing Density (sph)
Footnotes
Min
Max Coniferous (sph)
Max
Well Spaced Trees (sph)
Target
Pref/Acc
Minimum
PrefAcc
Minimum
Pref
Min
Horizontal
Dist.
Pref/Acc (m)
Height Relative to
Competition (%)
Other Required Stocking Information :
**Please use the stocking standards IDs for Prince George in the Reference Guide for FDP Stocking
Standards and provide a rationale if moving acceptable species into preferred species.
SITE PREPARATION
Area
TECHNIQUE (S) / LIMITING FACTORS
PLANTING
Area
SPZ
Class A
Regen
Mtd
Species
Age
Stock Type
Season
Stems/Ha
Total Stems
LIMITING FACTORS / COMMENTS:
MIN-MAX ELEVATION / REGIME:
BRUSHING / STAND TENDING
Area
TECHNIQUE (S) / LIMITING FACTORS
COARSE WOODY DEBRIS MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
AMENDMENT
Amendment number
Date Typed
Yr Mo Dy
RPF'S SIGNATURE and SEAL
Initials
Yes
Map Req’d
No
RPF PRINTED NAME
DATE SIGNED
I certify that I have reviewed this document and, while I did not
personally supervise the work described, I have determined that
this work has been done to standards acceptable of a
Registered Professional Forester.