Integrated Care Programmes: Inaugural Conference "Making People-centred Integrated Care a Reality" The Printworks, Dublin Castle, Republic of Ireland 6th October 2015 People-centred Integrated Care Strategy – Irish Launch Hernan Montenegro, MD, MPH Coordinator Services Organization and Clinical Interventions Unit Service Delivery and Safety Department World Health Organization Content • Global context and health system challenges • WHO policy directions • WHO strategy on integrated, people-centred health services (IPCHS) • Lessons learned on implementation of IPCHS: – Context – Content – Processes – Actors The changing global context: challenges and opportunities Ageing Innovation Climate change Globalization Rising costs NCDs Citizen voice Urbanization Source: WHO Global Health Observatory Data Repository, 2015 One view of the challenge: millions miss out on needed health services Percentage of Skill Birth Attendants 0 20 40 60 80 100 Q1, Q5 and Average - 22 0 10 20 30 Q5 Q1 Average Source: Latest available DHS for each country (excl. CIS countries) 40 50 • • • HAI pooled prevalence: 15·5 per 100 patients [95% CI 12·6–18·9]) was much higher than proportions reported from Europe & the USA. Pooled overall health-care-associated infection density in adult intensive-care units was 47·9 per 1000 patient-days (95% CI 36·7–59·1), at least 3 times as high as densities reported from the USA. Surgical-site infection was the leading infection in hospitals (pooled cumulative incidence 5·6 per 100 surgical procedures), strikingly higher than proportions recorded in developed countries. "The burden of health-care-associated infection in developing countries is high." Source: Allegranzi et al. Lancet. 2011 Jan 15;377(9761):228-41. Millions more suffer financially when they use health services EMR AFR EUR SEA AMR WPR impoverishment catastrophic - 30 60 Number of people (million) 90 Model of Care: Continuity of Care Section I.3: PHC Model of Care: Continuity of Care % 3.1 Respondents Responses, in Percent 50 40 30 20 10 0 3.1.1 Never 3.1.2 Almost never 3.1.3 Sometimes 3.1.1 Are patients seen by the same provider (doctor/ health team) whenever they consult? 3.1.2 Is there an appointment and follow-up system, including arranging home visits by the health team? 3.1.3 Is assigning people from a geographical area to lists or registries with a specific PHC provider or provider group encouraged? 3.1.4 Usually 3.1.5 Always 3.1.4 Does a good referral and counter-referral system based on case complexity normally function for patients? 3.1.5 Is there a policy that enables ensuring that PHC facilities are regularly covered by physicians or nurses? Ongoing challenges for health Lack of coordination Coordination Of Care, Medical Errors, And Safety Among Sicker Adults In Eleven Countries, 2011 Percent of respondents who: Experienced coordination gaps in past 2 years Test results/ Specialist lacked records not Key medical history or available at information regular doctor not appointment or not shared informed about duplicate tests among specialist care Country ordered providers AUS 19% 12% 19% CAN 25 14 18 FRA 20 13 37 GER 16 23 35 NETH 18 15 17 NZ 15 12 12 NOR 22 19 25 SWE 16 18 20 SWI 11 10 9 UK 13 7 6 US 27 17 18 Any gap 36% 40 53 56 37 30 43 39 23 20 42 Experienced gaps in hospital/surgery discharge planning 55% 50 73 61 66 51 71 67 48 26 29 Reported regular doctor seemed uninformed about hospital/ surgery care 18% 19 15 17 9 19 18 35 15 11 12 Experienced medical, medication, or lab error 19% 21 13 16 20 22 25 20 9 8 22 Reported pharmacist or doctor did not review prescription s in past year 34% 28 58 29 41 31 62 55 25 16 28 SOURCE adapted from 2011 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey of Sicker Adults In Eleven Countries % of hospitalized patients according to most appropriate site of care 51% Primary care 49% Non-primary care PAHO, 2004 WHO AFRO, 2012 Strengthening a global commitment to people centred integrated health services delivery People-centred and integrated health services in the NUKA health system, Alaska, USA Case management in Torbay, UK Promoting HIV/AIDS literacy in Angola Integrated health care networks in Brazil Integrated health care networks in Chile Social participation in Tupiza, Bolivia Shared accountability contract for population health outcomes, Kinzigtal, Germany Promoting service coordination in Lithuania Integrated care in South Karelia, Finland What are the experiences to date? Integrating HIV/AIDS and TB in Mali Mobilizing communities to reduce maternal and neonatal deaths in Malawi Family medicine in Thailand as part of UHC Balanced scorecard to promote accountability, Afghanistan Integrating traditional and complementary medicine in Asia Communityowned primary care networks in Mali Success Lessons from implementation: challenges to achieve sustainability and scale t1 t2 t3 Time (years) Project’s duration Source: Adapted from Amelung et al. 2014, Transform Proposal 1 Project failure 2 Slow death 3 Struggling projects 4 Sustainable projects 5 Scaling up 6 System transformation Defining people-centred integrated health services delivery People-centred health services People-centred health services are an approach to care that consciously adopts the perspectives of individuals, families and communities, and sees them as participants as well as beneficiaries of trusted health systems that respond to their needs and preferences in humane and holistic ways. It requires that people have the education and support they need to make decisions and participate in their own care. It is organized around the health needs and expectations of people rather than diseases. Integrated health services are health services that are managed and delivered in a way that ensures people receive a continuum of health promotion, disease prevention, diagnosis, treatment, disease management, rehabilitation and palliative care services, at the different levels and sites of care within the health system, and according to their needs, throughout their life course. Integrated health services Improved access to care for marginalized groups Reduced unplanned hospitalizations Increased ability to selfmanage Shared decision-making Shift in the balance of care, allocating resources closer to needs What outcomes have been achieved? Increased access to care Greater community influence & better relationships with care providers that build awareness and trust Improved health literacy Workforce role enhancement Reduced perinatal and neonatal mortality Reduced costs Increased health coverage Greater community engagement & participatory representation Better coordination of care Greater quality of care IPCHS: Key challenges on evidence • Multiple definitions of IPCHS • Evidence gaps: – Most research focused on: • Relatively narrowly-defined interventions in support of IPCHS • Treatment and diagnosis • Adult and elderly care – Less research on: • Broader approaches in support of IPCHS • Health promotion, prevention, long-term care, rehabilitation and palliative care • Other life stages such as childhood • • • • Evidence mainly derived from advanced economy settings Most times mixed results or without changes in health outcomes Outcomes are highly context-specific Policies and strategies need to be evidence-informed rather than evidence-based • Need more implementation research and sound evaluation A framework for people-centred integrated health services delivery One size does not fit all © World Health Organization 2015 Country Settings Fragile & Post-conflict: Low Income: - Special needs of refugees & displaced people - Specific health needs resulting from conflict - Increase in CDs due to disruption of water & sanitation services - Security issues - Unstable governance & weak institutional capacity - Damaged infrastructure - Acute shortages of HWF and other essential supplies Non-functioning delivery system - High dependency from external assistance & financing - Low Life Expectancy, high burden of CDs & malnutrition - High reliance on O-O-P contributions & regressive public health spending - Low public health expenditure as % of GDP - Poor governance & weak institutional capacity - Shortages of infrastructure, HRH and other essential supplies - Poorly developed delivery system & predominance of vertical programs - Majority of existing services provided by NGOs & informal providers - Poor information systems and lack of performance assessment - High dependency from external assistance & financing - Inequities that affect the most vulnerable population groups - Quality of care issues, including medicines - Fragmented care -Inefficient use of existing resources - Insufficient participation High Income: Medium Income: - High Life Expectancy, predominance of NCDs & mental health problems - Aged population - Medium Life Expectancy, double burden of disease: NCDs & CDs, mental health, injuries - Multi-morbidity - High reliance on O-O-P contributions & regressive public health spending - Need for chronic care - Low public health expenditure as % of GDP - High levels of public health spending & low levels of O-O-P contributions - Poorly organized delivery system with overreliance on vertical programs - High levels of public service provision - Poor information systems and lack of performance assessment Alignment between national health policies, strategies and plans and the IPCHS strategy Analysis by income level Overall proportion of countries whose national Policies, strategies and plans are aligned with the global strategy on IPCHS Analysis by WHO Region The way forward: five strategic directions © World Health Organization 2015 Strategic Goals and Objectives 1 Empowering and engaging people 1.1 Empowering and engaging individuals and families 1.2 Empowering and engaging communities 1.3 Reaching the underserved & marginalized 2 Strengthening governance and accountability 2.1 Bolstering participatory governance 2.2 Enhancing mutual accountability 3 Reorienting the model of care 3.1 Defining service priorities based on life-course needs and preferences 3.2 Revaluing promotion, prevention and public health 3.3 Building strong primary care-based systems 3.4 Shifting towards more outpatient and ambulatory care 3.5 Innovating and incorporating new technologies 4 Coordinating services 4.1 Coordinating care for individuals 4.2 Coordinating health programmes and providers 4.3 Coordinating across sectors 5 Creating an enabling environment 5.1 Strengthening leadership and management for change 5.2 Striving for quality improvement and safety 5.3 Reorienting the health workforce 5.4 Aligning regulatory frameworks 5.5 Reforming payment systems Next steps: parallel processes in the development of the strategy Strategy consultation Implementation support May 2015 Public consultation June 2015 Consultation with WHO Regional Offices Development of web-platform & launch (summertime 2015) Supporting demonstration sites 2016 World Health Assembly Fostering partnerships Developing tools for monitoring & evaluation © World Health Organization 2015 TRANSFORM – HORIZON 2020 (EU FUNDING) From successful pilot projects to at-scale implementation. Leadership and management for transformational change towards integrated health and social care systems The process is not simple, not linear Idealized Idealised planning processes It is not only the "plan“- the process is important! 5 year plan GHI … but the process is usually messy… Inclusive policy dialogue is key partn ers Annual Review Annual Review Annual Review Bottom-up participatory planning cycle CSO CSO NGO NGO Real-life Real-life planning processes → Facilitation of policy dialogue Private sector 5 year plan Lobbies CSO Government plan partners Elections Political priorities Program mes Civil service reform Operational plan disease x Annual Review Framework for analyzing the implementation of health care reform Context Players individuals Groups Content Processes Walt & Gibson 1994 Lessons learnt from: Context High priority within the whole of government political agenda Right political timing Part of broader sectoral and/or social protection reforms Embedded in national health policy & strategy supported by changes in legislation and regulation Linked to higher goals such as achieving UHC, high quality of care, patience experience and/or addressing chronic care Greater availability and dedicated resources Strategies are politically feasible and adapted to local context When implemented in the context of stronger health systems with less structural problems Service delivery in the value chain Sources: WHR 2000; WHO 2007 “Everybody’s business”; IHP+ 2011 “Common M&E framework”; van Olmen et.al. 2010 “Analysing HS to make them stronger” Lessons learnt: Content Common vision, shared values and a clear narrative for change that is easily understood Sound implementation plan with clear goals, measurable objectives, and defined roles and responsibilities Institutional capacity and dedicated resources for reform Strong communications and public relations strategies Multiple policy instruments targeting different levels of system Balanced top-down and bottom-up approaches Coherence across all reform policies and strategies Focus on clinical integration and clinical leadership Alignment of financial incentives Policy instruments and intervention levels Information & Exhortation Society Legal & Regulation Community Building Capacity of others Family Person UHC with High Quality, Integrated People-centred Services National Context Direct Provider(s) Bureaucratic Reforms Health Facility Taxes & Subsidies Provider Network Service Provision System Financing & Contracting Global & Regional Context Lessons learnt: Processes Processes are complex, difficult and long-term Sustained political will, leadership and policy direction over time Build from existing structures and strengths Different speeds depending on political context: "big-bang" versus gradual, incremental Experiment and test innovative approaches, allow for failure Take advantage of low hanging fruits and demonstrate early gains through measurable results Use demonstration sites and spread knowledge gains Lessons learnt: Actors Patients, users, and service providers should be involved in all stages of reform Support from the public and strategic alliances Quality interpersonal and inter-institutional relations, including: willingness to change, trust, credibility, appreciation, and sense of belonging Close gap between policy makers, managers, providers and users through spaces for open dialogue and exchanges CONTACT INFORMATION Services Delivery and Safety Department World Health Organization Avenue Appia 20 CH-1211, Geneva 27 Switzerland For more information on health services delivery visit http://www.who.int/servicedeliverysafety/areas/peoplecentred-care/en/
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz