HR Nicholls Lunch Time Forum How can the Labour market Help

HR Nicholls Lunch Time Forum
How can the Labour market Help the SA
Economy?
Bert Kelly Research Centre
Adelaide
22 October 2014
Presenter: Malcolm Bosworth
Introduction
• SA faces difficult economic challenges
– Industry assistance is no answer
• Maintaining protected industries e.g. cars has failed for
both SA & the nation
• SA must attract efficient industries non-reliant
on protection
– Shipbuilding needs to compete without depending
on defence procurement preferences
• Privatisation/maximum (transparent) preference
margins possible reforms
Economic Framework
• The plight of Club Med economies in the
Eurozone provides parallels to Australia
– Losing competiveness with no ER to maintain it
• Higher ER in Euro than otherwise hurts exports & importcompeting firms
– Must undergo meaningful structural adjustment
• Includes lowering real wages
• Strong economies e.g. Germany gains
– Lower ER than otherwise benefits exports & importcompeting firms via enhanced competitiveness
Australian Situation
• Single currency has similar effects
– Weaker states e.g. SA, TAS higher ER than if they
had their own currency
– Stronger states e.g. WA, NSW have lower ER
• Highlights the plight of weaker states trying to
compete internationally & domestically with
stronger states
– Weaker states must (and be able to) economically
adjust
Enabling States to Compete
• Uniformity among states in many areas make sense
e.g. transport BUT
• In some areas its problematic & hampers weaker states
from competing with stronger states & adjusting
structurally to compete
– especially where nationally policies reflect capacities &
performances of stronger states
• State competition must be healthy not distorting
– Avoid competing with state subsidies, incentives etc
• Recent focus by SA Government largely aspirational
– marginal effects & distract from needed reforms
Policy Response
• SA Government should focus on deregulation
to enable businesses to better compete
• Labour market key, especially minimum wages
– Economic case for minimum wages weak
– Trade off higher unemployment for higher wages
• Any national minimum wage should be
– Not too high to distort labour market
– Differ across states to reflect economic conditions
• initially state minimum wages
National Minimum Wages
• High by international standards at $641/week
– 56% of national AWEs
– Junior 17 yo = 57.8% of minimum wage
National Minimum Wages
• State impact varies widely due to varying
AWEs
– MW as % of AWE highest for TAS (66% & SA 64%)
– Lowest for ACT at 45%
Policy Reform
• Strong economic argument to
– Reduce overall national MW as a share of AWE
– Vary MWs to reflect lower AWEs in weaker states e.g.
SA
• Recommended by CA
– Reduce real national MW until it reaches 44% of
national AWE over 10 years
– Lower real state MW to reach national level or, if
lower, 44% of state’s AWE by 2023
– National MW estimated to be by 2023 $722 in ACT,
NSW, WA & NT; $681 in VIC, $702 in QLD, $637 in SA,
& $622 in TAS
Projected National WW by State
Conclusion
• Deregulation of labour market could play an
important role in re-vitalising SA economy
– Australia & states becoming a high cost economy
– Reforming national MW could ease wage
pressures nationally & in SA if allowed to vary
between states to reflect economic conditions
• Such reforms offer more sustainable potential
growth opportunities than failed protection