Click to edit Master title style

Substance Abuse
Prevention Collaborative
Orientation
July 16, 2015
Fernando Perfas
Massachusetts Department of Public Health
Bureau of Substance Abuse Services
Scott Formica
Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc.
Lauren Gilman, Massachusetts Technical Assistance Partnership for
Prevention
Massachusetts Technical Assistance Partnership for Prevention
Agenda
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Tech Overview
Welcome from BSAS
Connection between UAD and Other Drug Use
Cluster Model and Strategic Planning
Fiscal Structure
TA with MassTAPP
Resources for Talking to Media
Upcoming Events and Next Steps
2
Today’s Webinar Team
Fernando
Perfas
Assistant
Director of
Prevention,
BSAS
Scott Formica
Social Science
Research &
Evaluation, Inc.
(SSRE)
Lauren Gilman
Project
Director,
MassTAPP
Ben
Spooner
TA Provider,
MassTAPP
Aubrey Ciol
Research
Assistant,
MassTAPP
3
SAPC Contract Managers
• Amal Marks
• SAPC Programs:
– Barnstable County, Northern Berkshire County, Dukes County, City
of Fitchburg, Franklin County, City of Gardner, Hampshire County,
Town of Hudson, Town of Needham, City of Peabody, Town of
Plymouth, Town of Stoughton, Town of Watertown.
4
SAPC Contract Managers
• Tonya Fernandes
• SAPC Programs:
– City of Boston, City of Brockton, City of Fall River, City of
Gloucester, City of Lynn, City of Melrose, City of Lawrence, City of
New Bedford, City of Somerville, City of Springfield, Town of
Tewksbury, City of Worcester.
5
Scope of the Issue
• Positive trends in the past decade on almost every indicator
of underage alcohol use.
• Alcohol is most commonly used substance among youth.
• Evidence continues to indicate that underage drinking
prevention has spillover effects into other behavioral health
areas (e.g., drug use, violence, suicide).
• Underage drinking prevention is other drug use prevention.
7
Lifetime* Use of Alcohol Among MA High School Students
Massachusetts YRBS (1993 – 2013)
100%
80%
76%
79%
79%
80%
81%
75%
76%
73%
71%
68%
63%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1993
*
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
Lifetime use is any use in one’s lifetime.
8
Lifetime* Use of Other Drugs – MA High School Students
Massachusetts YRBS (2013)
100%
80%
60%
41%
40%
20%
13%
4%
5%
Cocaine
Ecstasy
2%
1%
0%
Marijuana
*
Meth
Rx Drugs
Heroin
Lifetime use is any use in one’s lifetime.
9
Current* Use of Alcohol Among MA High School Students
Massachusetts YRBS (1993 – 2013)
100%
80%
60%
53%
54%
47%
52%
53%
46%
48%
46%
44%
40%
40%
36%
20%
0%
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
* Current use is any use in the 30 days prior to the survey.
10
Current* Use of Alcohol – MA Students by Grade
Massachusetts YRBS (2013)
100%
80%
60%
49%
40%
40%
33%
22%
20%
2%
5%
6th
7th
10%
0%
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
* Current use is any use in the 30 days prior to the survey.
11
Binge* Use of Alcohol Among MA High School Students
Massachusetts YRBS (1993 – 2013)
100%
80%
60%
40%
33%
28%
33%
33%
33%
27%
27%
28%
25%
22%
20%
19%
0%
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
* Respondents were asked about consuming “5 or more drinks of alcohol in a row, that is, within a couple of hours.”
12
Drank Alcohol Before Age 13 – MA High School Students
Massachusetts YRBS (1993 – 2013)
100%
80%
60%
40%
31%
31%
31%
30%
28%
25%
22%
20%
20%
17%
15%
11%
0%
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
13
Early Alcohol Use Increases Likelihood of
Illicit Drug Use and Dependence*
100%
Ever Used Illicit
Drugs (n=6,102)
80%
60%
47%
49%
Ever Illicit Drug
Dependent
(n=2,480)
43%
35%
40%
28%
20%
17%
13%
19%
9%
7%
18%
11%
4%
2%
3%
1%
9%
1%
0%
<14
14
15
16
17
18
Age at Alcohol Onset
19
20
>21
* Hingson, R.W., Heeren, T., & Edwards, E.M. (2008). Age at drinking onset, alcohol dependence, and their relation to drug use and dependence, driving
under the influence of drugs, and motor-vehicle crash involvement because of drugs. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Mar;69(2):192-201.
14
Problem Behaviors in 12th Grade
Based on 7th Grade Drinking Status*
100%
7th Grade Non-Drinkers (n=1487)
7th Grade Experimenters (n=2884)
80%
7th Grade Drinkers (n=1967)
57%
60%
46%
40%
33%
14%
20%
3%
18%
27%
14%
6%
4%
9%
15%
0%
Weekly
Pot Use
Hard Drug
Polydrug Use
Use Past Yr
Past Yr
Problem Behaviors At Grade 12
Multiple Drug
Problems
* Ellickson, P.L., Tucker, J.S., & Klein, D.J. (2003). Ten-Year Prospective Study of Public Health Problems Associated with Early Drinking. Pediatrics,
May;111(5):949-955.
15
Problem Behaviors at Age 23
Based on 7th Grade Drinking Status*
100%
7th Grade Non-Drinkers (n=846)
7th Grade Experimenters (n=1565)
80%
69%
7th Grade Drinkers (n=958)
60%
43%
40%
26%
20%
4%
42%
31%
30%
19%
18%
11%
18%
8%
3% 6%
9%
5% 8%
13%
0%
Weekly
Pot Use
Hard Drug
Use Past Yr
Polydrug
Drug
Multiple Drug
AOD TX
Use Past Yr
Abuse
Problems
Since Age 18
Problem Behaviors At Age 23
* Ellickson, P.L., Tucker, J.S., & Klein, D.J. (2003). Ten-Year Prospective Study of Public Health Problems Associated with Early Drinking. Pediatrics,
May;111(5):949-955.
16
SAPC Grant vs UAD Grant
•
•
•
•
Strategic Planning Process
Pilot Strategy
Cluster Model
Reporting Requirements: MIS Reports and Quarterly
Narratives
• Cost-Reimbursement Grant
17
Fiscal Structure
18
SAPC Timeline
July 1, 2015
•
April 29, 2016
June 30, 2016
Key upcoming deadlines (pilot strategy memo) final strategic plan due date
SAPC Timeline – Pilot Strategy
•
•
REQUIRED: ONE partner municipality (or lead municipality/agency, if applicable)
must identify and begin to implement a pilot of one universal prevention strategy
by November 2, 2015.
No later than October 12, 2015 Lead municipality/agency must submit a memo to
BSAS that includes the following:
–
–
–
An outline of the pilot strategy that will be implemented while the strategic plan is being developed
The partner municipality/agency being designated to implement the pilot strategy
A one-page description of the designated partner’s capacity and readiness to implement the
strategy, as well as the need for and the appropriateness of the strategy in that community
*Determination of which partner municipality will implement the pilot strategy
should be determined collaboratively by the members of the Cluster. Priority
should be given to communities that demonstrate both a capacity and readiness to
implement the strategy as well as the need, and appropriate fit.
Your MassTAPP TA Team
Kat Allen
Carl Alves
Jessica
Koelsch
Gary
Langis
Tracy
Desovich
Deborah
Milbauer
Amanda
Doster
Alejandro
Rivera
Lauren
Gilman
Ben
Spooner
Jack
Vondras
21
MassTAPP TA support
• Technical Assistance Provider is your point of
contact
• Individualized assistance + expertise of the
entire team
• Group TA and information sharing (webinars
and in-person
• Opportunities for peer-to-peer sharing
• Resources on MassTAPP’s website
22
SAPC Guidance Document
http://masstapp.edc.org/substance-abuse-prevention-collaborative-sapc-guidance-document
23
Responding to Media Inquiries
• Substance abuse prevention is a high-profile issue!
• Remember – you don’t have to respond to inquiries
right away
• Questions? Contact your TA provider or your BSAS
contract manager
• Need resources? Check our web site:
– Strategies for Working with the Media
– The Do’s and Don’ts of Effective Messaging for Substance
Abuse Prevention
24
Communications Conference
25
Next Steps
• Webinar on Tuesday, August 18th at 11:00AM
to go over timeline in detail, ask questions and
get clarification
• Build your team and establish a protocol for
shared decision-making
• Get your cluster up to speed on the Strategic
Prevention Framework
• Stay in touch with your TA provider!
26