Chapter 17 Capital Structure Determination Chapter Objectives Discuss the impact of financial leverage on a firm’s capital structure. Outline both MM Proposition I and MM Proposition II. Discuss the impact of corporate taxes on MM Propositions I and II. Explain the impact of bankruptcy costs on the value of a firm. Identify a firm’s optimal capital structure. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 1 Capital Structure Capital Structure -- The mix (or proportion) of a firm’s permanent long-term financing represented by debt, preferred stock, and common stock equity. Concerned with the effect of capital market decisions on security prices. Assume: (1) investment and asset management decisions are held constant and (2) consider only debt-versus-equity financing. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 2 A Conceptual Look --Relevant Rates of Return ki = the yield on the company’s debt ki = I B = Annual interest on debt Market value of debt Assumptions: • Interest paid each and every year • Bond life is infinite • Results in the valuation of a perpetual bond • No taxes (Note: allows us to focus on just capital structure issues.) Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 3 A Conceptual Look --Relevant Rates of Return ke = the expected return on the company’s equity Earnings available to E E common shareholders = = ke S Market value of common S stock outstanding Assumptions: • Earnings are not expected to grow • 100% dividend payout • Results in the valuation of a perpetuity • Appropriate in this case for illustrating the theory of the firm Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 4 A Conceptual Look --Relevant Rates of Return ko = an overall capitalization rate for the firm O O ko= VV = Net operating income Total market value of the firm Assumptions: • V = B + S = total market value of the firm • O = I + E = net operating income = interest paid plus earnings available to common shareholders Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 5 Capitalization Rate Capitalization Rate, ko -- The discount rate used to determine the present value of a stream of expected cash flows. ko = ki B B+S + ke S B+S Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 6 Net Income Approach Net Income Approach -- A theory of capital structure in which the weighted average cost of capital will decrease and the total value of the firm will increase as financial leverage is becoming greater. Assume: Both ki and ke are unrelated to the financial leverage. Optimal Capital Structure -- The capital structure that minimizes the firm’s cost of capital and thereby maximizes the value of the firm. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 7 Net Income Approach K Ke Ko Ki 0 V 100% B/V V 0 B/V 100% Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 8 Summary of NI Approach Critical assumption is both ki and ke remain constant. As long as ki and ke are constant, ko is a decreasing linear function of the debt-to-equity ratio. Thus, there is a optimal capital structure when B/V is 100%. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 9 Net Operating Income Approach Net Operating Income Approach -- A theory of capital structure in which the weighted average cost of capital and the total value of the firm remain constant as financial leverage is changed. Assume: Both ki and ko remain constant. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 10 Required Rate of Return on Equity Capital costs and the NOI approach in a graphical representation. Capital Costs (%) .25 ke = 16.25% and 17.5% respectively .20 ke (Required return on equity) .15 ko (Capitalization rate) .10 ki (Yield on debt) .05 0 0 .25 .50 .75 1.0 1.25 1.50 Financial Leverage (B / S) Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 1.75 2.0 11 Summary of NOI Approach Critical assumption is ko remains constant. An increase in cheaper debt funds is exactly offset by an increase in the required rate of return on equity. As long as ki is constant, ke is a linear function of the debt-to-equity ratio. Thus, there is no one optimal capital structure. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 12 Traditional Approach Traditional Approach -- A theory of capital structure in which there exists an optimal capital structure and where management can increase the total value of the firm through the judicious use of financial leverage. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 13 Optimal Capital Structure: Traditional Approach Traditional Approach ke Capital Costs (%) .25 ko .20 .15 ki .10 Optimal Capital Structure .05 0 Financial Leverage (B / S) Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 14 Summary of the Traditional Approach The cost of capital is dependent on the capital structure of the firm. Initially, low-cost debt is not rising and replaces more expensive equity financing and ko declines. Then, increasing financial leverage and the associated increase in ke and ki more than offsets the benefits of lower cost debt financing. Thus, there is one optimal capital structure where ko is at its lowest point. This is also the point where the firm’s total value will be the largest (discounting at ko). Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 15 The Modigliani-Miller Theorem (intuition) It is after the ball game and the pizza man is delivering a pizza to Yogi . “Should I cut it into four slices as usual, Yogi?” asks the pizza man. “No,” replies Yogi, “Cut it into eight; I’m hungry tonight.” Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 16 The Modigliani-Miller Theorem Intuition: the way that a pie is sliced does not effect its size. Equivocally, it is the size of the firm's cash flows and not how these cash flows are diced up that drives firm value. Debt Equity Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 17 MM Proposition I Value of firm Value of firm Shares 40% Debt 60% Debt 40% Shares 60% The size of the pie does not depend on how it is sliced. The value of the firm is unaffected by its capital structure. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 18 The Modigliani-Miller Theorem (Cont.) Modigliani and Miller Capital Structure Irrelevance Proposition I The value of a company derives from the operations of the company. Changes in capital structure only affect the way in which the distribution of the cash flows between stockholders and bondholders is achieved. Firm value is dependent not on how it is financed, but on its operations. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 19 M&M Irrelevance Proposition II True or false: Firms can lower their cost of capital by substituting debt for equity, since debt is much cheaper than equity How can you support your argument? Definition of M&M II The expected return on a levered firm’s equity is a linear function of firm’s debt to equity ratio. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 20 The MM Propositions I & II (No Taxes) Proposition I Firm value is not affected by leverage VL = VU Proposition II Leverage increases the risk and return to stockholders rs = r0 + (B/S) (r0 - rB) rB is the interest rate (cost of debt) rs is the return on (levered) equity (cost of equity) r0 is the return on unlevered equity (cost of capital) B is the value of debt S is the value of levered equity Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 21 The MM Propositions I & II (with Corporate Taxes) Proposition I (with Corporate Taxes) Firm value increases with leverage VL = VU + TC B Proposition II (with Corporate Taxes) The increase in equity risk and return is partly offset by tax shield of the debt rS = r0 + (B/S)×(1-TC)×(r0 - rB) rB is the interest rate (cost of debt) rS is the return on equity (cost of equity) r0 is the return on unlevered equity (cost of capital) B is the value of debt S is the value of levered equity Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 22 Discussion of the assumptions of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem: No change in investment policy. Perfect capital market No transaction costs No taxes No bankruptcy costs Competitive market Individuals can borrow at the same rate as the corporations. Symmetric information All cash flows are perpetuities, meaning a zero growth rate. Homogeneous expectation Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 23 Graphical representation of M&M with corporate tax Total Firm Value VL VU DTC VU M&M: = VL VU Debt as % of capital Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 24 Absolute priority rule Absolute priority rule states that debt holders must be paid in full before equity holders receive any proceeds of the bankruptcy, secured debt holders be paid before unsecured debt holder, and senior debt holders be paid before junior debt holder. Who gets paid first? Secured claims Administrative claims Gap claims: post-filing/pre-trustee expenses Wages & salaries ($2,000 limit per person) Benefit plan claims Consumer claims and deposits. Taxes and rents. Unsecured creditors. Preferred stockholders. Common stockholders. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 25 Bankruptcy Technical Insolvency Insolvency in Bankruptcy Legal Bankruptcy Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 26 Bankruptcy Costs -- Direct bankruptcy costs Direct costs of financial distress are the legal and administrative charges that occur during bankruptcy proceedings and that are taken from the cash flows that otherwise would go to the bondholders and stockholders. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 27 Direct bankruptcy costs (cont.) Some estimates the tax advantages of debt (TcD) are maybe 20 cents on the dollar. Thus, they argue the costs in terms of expected financial distress are small compared to its advantages. Because most of the direct costs of bankruptcy are the same for both small and large firms, the bankruptcy costs of small firms as a proportion of the value of their assets, are much larger. For small firms, these costs may be fairly large, perhaps 20-25% of a firm’s value. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 28 Bankruptcy Costs -- Indirect bankruptcy costs Indirect bankruptcy costs: potential costs due to firm’s liquidation. Also known as financial distress costs. Types of indirect bankruptcy costs: Loss of valuable trademark, brand, etc. Impaired ability to conduct business Loss of potential business deals, partners, Assets sold in fire-sale Employees Agency costs Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 29 Example In the late 1970s, a financially distressed Chrysler would have defaulted on its debt had the government not intervened. In 1979, Chrysler offered rebates on its cars and trucks to attract customers who might have avoided Chrysler vehicles because of the company’s financial distress. Assuming a $300 rebate on each vehicle and if Chrysler sold 1,438,000 cars and trucks in 1979, then how much financial costs come from this rebate incentive? Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 30 Agency Costs Agency costs: conflict between debt holders and equity holders, old bondholders and new bondholders The incentives of equity holders to maximize the value of their shares are not necessarily consistent with the incentive to maximize the total value of the firm’s debt and equity. Total assets of firm = total debt + total equity Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 31 Who bears the bankruptcy costs? (Direct costs) Under the absolute priority rule, most of a firm’s value in the event of bankruptcy is transferred to its debt holders. Since the direct costs of bankruptcy diminish the value of the firm, most direct costs are thus ultimately borne by the firm’s debt holder. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 32 Who bears the bankruptcy costs? (Cont.) Since lenders realize they will be bearing costs in the event of bankruptcy, they change a higher interest rate, default premium, on the firms that are in financial distress. Default premium: the differences between the promised yield to the bond’s lenders and the yield on a bond with no default. Thus, equity holders are, in effect, paying the expected bankruptcy costs whenever they issue risky debt. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 33 Optimal Capital Structure: Optimal capital structure is achieved by finding the point at which the tax benefit of an extra dollar of debt = potential cost of financial distress. This is the point of: Optimal amount of debt Maximum value of the firm Optimal debt to equity ratio Minimal cost of WACC This will obviously vary from firm to firm and takes some effort to evaluate. No single equation can guarantee profitability or even survival Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 34 Concluding remarks on capital structure Where do we stand? Do we have an optimal capital structure? What do we mean by optimal capital structure? There are two main theories of capital structure choice: trade-off theory and pecking order theory. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 35 Trade-off theory The trade-off theory says that companies have optimal debt-equity ratios, by trading off the benefits of debt against its costs What are some advantages and disadvantages of debt that you can think of? The good news: interest payments are deductible and create a debt tax shield (TCD). The bad news: all else equal, borrowing more money increases the probability (and therefore the expected value) of direct and indirect bankruptcy costs. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 36 Trade-off theory (Cont.) Value of firm under MM with corporate taxes and debt Value of firm (V) Present value of tax shield on debt VL = VU + TCB Present value of financial distress costs Maximum firm value V = Actual value of firm VU = Value of firm with no debt 0 Debt (B) B* Optimal amount of debt Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 37 Trade-off theory (Cont.) What does this trade-off formula tells us? Based on the trade-off theory, what prediction can we make? Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 38 Pecking-order theory Pecking-order theory is the main contender to the tradeoff theory. It bases its argument on information asymmetry. It argues that actual corporate leverage ratios typically do not reflect capital structure targets. Instead, the widely observed corporate practice is financing new investment with internal financing when possible and issuing debt rather than equity if external financing is needed. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 39 Pecking-order theory (Cont.) According to the theory, management is reluctant to issue underpriced equity (though often willing to issue fairly priced or overpriced equity). Investors thus interpret management decisions to raise equity as a sign that the firm is overvalued and devalue the firm’s stock. Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 40 Critical considerations: Firms with greater risk of financial distress must borrow less The greater volatility in EBIT, the less a firm should borrow (magnify risk of losses) Costs of financial distress can be minimized the more easily firm assets can be liquidated to cover obligations A firm with more liquid assets may therefore have less financial risk in borrowing A firm with more proprietary assets (unique to the firm, hard to liquidate) should minimize borrowing Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 41 The Extended Pie Model Lower financial leverage Bondholder claim Shareholder claim Bankruptcy claim Tax claim Higher financial leverage Bondholder claim Shareholder claim Bankruptcy claim Tax claim Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11/e by Van Horne and Wachowicz. Slides prepared by Wu Xiaolan 42
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz