ISO 15189:2012 Medical laboratoriesRequirements for Quality and competence นางสุขใจ ผลอาไพสถิตย ์ 30 กรกฎาคม 2557 •เตรียมความพร ้อมในการขอร ับรอง ISO 15189:2012 ปี 2558 Summary of changes (2) • Title : Medical laboratories-Requirements for quality and competence • Definitions - 19 (2007) and 27 (2012) definitions - (7) removed: accuracy to measurement , uncertainty etc. - Additional 15 definitions: alert interval, nonconformity, process etc. ISO 15189: 2003, 2007, 2012 • ISO 15189:2007 • ISO 15189:2012 • ข้อกาหนด 4.14.15 • ข้อกาหนด 5.15.8 • ข้อกาหนด 4.14.15 • ข้อกาหนด 5.15.10 5.1 Personnel (Significant editorial) •Divide personnel requirements into sections 5.1.1- 5.1.9 5.1.1 General 5.1.2 Personnel qualification 5.1.3 Job description 5.1.4 Personnel introduction to the organizational environment 5.1.5 Training 5.1.6 Competence assessment 5.1.7 Reviews of staff performance 5.1.8 Continuing education and professional development 5.1.9 Personnel records • Responsibilities of lab director moved out 5.1 Personnel 5.1.1 Documented procedure: personnel management new 5.1.2 Personnel qualifications new ผู้บริ หารระบุคณ ุ สมบัติบคุ ลากรในทุกตาแหน่งเป็ นลายลักษณ์ฯ Personnel qualification: appropriate education, training, experience and demonstrated skills 5.1.4 new Personnel introduction to the org environment Lab has a programme to introduce new staff : Department or area in which the person will work, terms and condition of employment, staff facilities, health and safety requirement, occupational health service. 5.1 Personnel 5.1.5 Amended /new •Lab provide training for all personnel -Quality Management System -Assigned work processes and procedures -Application of LIM -Health and safety, prevention or containment of effect of adverse incident -Ethics (จริยธรรม) -Confidentiality of patient information •Personnel are undergoing training supervised at all time •Effectiveness of training programme periodically reviewed 5.1 Personnel 5.1.6 • Assess the competence of each personnel to perform Sig editorial assigned task following training • Reassessment at regular intervals • Retraining occur when necessary • Competence of lab staff can be assessed by any combination or all following approaches * Note 1 -Direct observation of routine work processes and procedure, safety practice -Direct ob of equipment maintenance and function checks -Monitoring the recording and reporting the exam results -Review of work record -Assessment of problem solving skill 5.1 Personnel 5.1.7 Review of staff performance new Reviews of staff performance to maintain or improve the quality of service 5.1.8 Continuing education and professional development Amended /new •A continuing education programme available to personnel who participate in managerial and technical process. •Personnel must take part in continuing education •Effectiveness of the edu pro reviewed periodically • Personnel take part in regular professional development 5.1 5.1.9 amend ed Personnel • Record of all personnel maintained • Record readily available and include 1. Copy of certification when applicable 2. Introduction of new staff to the lab environment (Orientation) 3. Reviews of staff performance 4. Reports of accidents, exposure to occupational hazards 5. Training in current job tasks 6. Competency assessment 7. Records of continuing edu and achievements 8. Immunization status 9. JD 10. Previous work experience • Records are not stored in the lab Lab equipment , reagent , consumables 5.3 Lab equip, reagent, consumables Note •Lab equipment: hardware and software of instruments, measuring systems, lab information system (LIS) •Reagent: reference materials, calibrators & quality control materials •Consumables: culture media, pipette tips, slide etc 5.3 Lab equip, reagent, consumables Sig editorial 5.3.1.1 general 5.3.1.2 acceptance testing 5.3.1.3 instruction for use 5.3.1.4 cal and metrological traceability 5.3.1.5 equipment maintenance and repair 5.3.1.6 adverse incident reporting 5.3.1.7 records 5.3 Lab equip, reagent, consumables Sig editorial 5.3.1.1 general 5.3.1.2 acceptance testing 5.3.1.3 instruction for use 5.3.1.4 cal and metrological traceability 5.3.1.5 equipment maintenance and repair 5.3.1.6 adverse incident reporting 5.3.1.7 records 5.3 Lab equip, reagent, consumables 5.3.1.1 General • Procedure for selection, purchasing and management of equipment •Lab replace equipment as needed to ensure the quality of exam results 5.3.1.3 Equipment instructions for use • lab has procedures for safe handling, transport, storage and use of equip to prevent its contamination 5.3 Lab equip, reagent, consumables 5.3.1.4 new Equipment calibration and metrological traceability • Procedure for calibration of equip that direct of indirect affects exam results include: •Metrological traceability must be to a reference material 5.3.1.7 Equipment records Performance records include copies of report/certificates of all calibrations and/or verifications. 5.3 Lab equip, reagent, consumables 5.3.2 5.3.2.1 new 5.3.2.2 new Reagents, consumables •Procedure for reception, storage, acceptance testing, inventory management of reagent and consumable 5.3.2.4 new 5.3.2.5 new • Receiving location have adequate storage and handling capacities to prevent damage/deterioration and this must be verified, where lab is not receiving facility •Inventory control system segregate uninspected & unacceptable reagents and consumables from the accepted ones •Instruction for the use of reagents & consum. available inventory management Reagent records 5.3 Lab equip, reagent, consumables 5.3.2.6 Reagents, consumables- adverse incident reporting Incident that attributed directly to specific reagents or consum. Investigated and reported to manufacturer and authorities Reagent records: -Identity -manufacturer’s name, -expire date, date material taken out of service -condition received (acceptable/ damaged) -manufacturer’s instruction -initial acceptance for use -performance records that confirm for ongoing acceptance for use -where reagent prepared in-house, records must include person (s) undertake the preparation & date 5.3.2.7 amended Pre-examination processes 5.4 Pre-exam processes Sig 5.4.1 general editorial 5.4.2 info for patients and users 5.4.3 request form info 5.4.4 primary sample collection and handling 5.4.5 Sample transportation 5.4.6 Sample reception 5.4.7 Pre-exam handling, preparation and storage 5.4 5.4.1 5.4.2 Amended Pre-exam processes Procedure for pre-exam (คูม่ ือเก็บตัวอย่าง) information for patients and users • location, type of clinical services, Opening hours of lab •Exam offered, sample volume, special precaution, TAT, biological reference intervals,clinical decision values • Instruction for completion request form, collection • instruction for transportation, special handling needs • Criteria for accepting, rejecting sample • a list of factors known to affect the performance of exam or the interpretation of the results • lab’s policy on protection of personal information •Lab ‘s complaint procedure 5.4 Pre-exam processes 5. 4.3 Request form info • clinically relevant info about patient for exam performance and result interpretation purpose -Family history, travel and exposure history • date and time of sample collection, receipt • lab cooperate with users in clarifying the user’s request amended 5.4 Pre-exam pro Pre-exam processes 5.4.4.1 new 5.4.4.3d new - Genneral where users requires deviations from doc collection procedure, these must be recorded in exam results and be communicated to the appropriate personnel -Instruction for collection activities info regarding sample containers, additives etc must be communicated to those staff, in situation where collection performed by clinical staff. Examination processes 5.5 Examination processes 5.5.1.1 amend • Selection, verification& validation procedures -preferred procedure: in vitro medical devices, published in established/authoritative textbook, peer-reviewed texts or journals or international consensus stds or guidelines - The identity of persons performing recorded 5.5.1.2 • Verification of exam procedure Amend/ validated procedure must be verified before use info to be obtained from the manufacturer / method new developer regarding the performance characteristics of the procedure procedure of verification, the verification must confirm that the performance claim met and reviewed by appropriate staff 5.5 Examination processes 5.5.1.3 amend -Validation of exam procedures For non-std methods, developed methods , std method used outside their intended scope , validated method modified • Performance characteristics: measurement trueness, accuracy, precision, repeatability, intermediate precision, Uncertainty, analytical specificity, sensitivity, detection limit, quantitation limit, diagnostic spec &sensitivity. 5.5 Examination processes 5.5.1.4 Measurement uncertainty of measured quantity values determine the uncertainty of results with the quantity values Amend/new Where exam include a measurement step but do not report a quantity value, lab should calculate the uncertainty of measurement step in assessing the reliability of the procedure or influence the reported result. Biological reference intervals or clinical decision values 5.5.2 define, documented and communicated to users amend Documentation of exam procedures include: patient prep, type of containers& additives 5. 5.3 Principle of procedure for cal results ; Uncertainty, amend/new Envi & safety control, biological reference control etc Ensuring quality of examination results 5.6 Ensuring quality of examination results 5.6.1 general Sig editorial 5.6.2 quality control 5.6.3 interlab comparison 5.6 5.6.1 new 5.6.2.2 new 5.6.2.3 new Ensuring quality of examination results performing exam under defined conditions appropriate pre and post –exam are implement Result are not fabricated Quality control materials react in a manner as close to patient samples periodically examined with a frequency based on stability of procedure and the risk of harm to the patient from erroneous result Quality control data • procedure to prevent results being released in a QC failure •When QC rules are violated, results rejected and reexam after errors •QC data regularly reviewed to detect trends with preventive action , recorded 5.6 5.6.3 5.6.3.1 new Ensuring quality of examination results Inter laboratory comparisons •Participation participate in an inter lab comparisons ( such as EQA,PT programme) 5.6.3.2 editorial Procedure for inter lab comparison participation: responsibility & instruction for participation, any performance criteria differed from the prog •Alternative approaches certified ref materials, sample previously examined, material from cell repositories, exchange of samples with other labs Control materials that are tested daily in inter lab comparison prog 5.6 5.6.3.3 new 5.6.3.4 new Ensuring quality of examination results Analysis of inter lab comparison samples Integrate the samples into routine workflow Evaluation of lab performance •Performance in interlab comparison reviewed and discussed with relevant staff •when predetermined performance criteria are not fulfilled ,implement corrective action Post- examination processes 5.7 Post-examination processes 5.7.1 Review of results Amend/ SOP include ensuring that personnel review new the results of exam before release and evaluate against internal quality control involves automatic reporting review criteria to be documented 5.9 5.9.2 New Release of results Automated selection and reporting of results requirement and criteria for automated results 5.10 5.10.1 5.10.2 5.10.3 LIM Information system: computerized and noncomputerized Authorities and responsibilities • define authorities and respon of all personnel Who use the system: acess pat data&info, examination results, change data&results, release the results LIM :collection, processing, recording etc validated and verified, protected, safeguard
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz