Reflective Evaluation
Second Workshop, Koebenhavn
biat, Flensburg
Irina Michel, Wiebke Petersen,
Gerald Heidegger
SE-TOOL
Results
of Survey with Practitioners,
Participants, Those Responsible,
Stakeholders
• Practitioners and those responsible:
The interviews with practicioners and those responsible
were carried through in CVT courses in the former east
German states and in the north of Germany
• Participants: Mostly long time unemployed with reduced
aid (some forced to) taking part in government make-work
projects
• Stakeholders: Social Partners and Chambers of
Commerce and Industry
SE-TOOL
Results of Interview with
Practicioners
Most practitioners stated:
•
Wish to have (more) access to further qualification
•
Would like to have more time for reflection and self-evaluation
•
Would like to have access to a material pool
•
Would like to use different self-evaluation methods
•
Would like to use a self-evaluation tool:
-
That is Structured well
-
That is Easy to use
-
That provides opportunity for cooperation with other practitioners
-
That offers “ possible solutions“ for difficult teaching and learning
situations
-
That helps to find further qualification possibilities
SE-TOOL
Conclusions from the
Interview with Practitioners for
the Dimensions of the SelfEvaluation (SE)-Tool
Most important to practitioners is/ are:
• Further training and qualification
• Self-evaluation and reflection
• Cooperation, networking
• Exchange of learning and teaching (training)
experiences
• Access to a material pool
SE-TOOL
Results of Interview with
Participants
Most participants told us:
– They did not expect that their qualifying themselves in the CVT
courses would lead to and result in their reintegration into the labour
market
– How important it is to them that they have a daily schedule („not sitting
around worthlessly“) and „how good it feels to deserve the Hartz V
basic jobless benefits“ even though they did not judge their work or
qualification results as beeing required by the labour market
– They considered feeling comfortable with the people your are working
with and the circumstances you are working in as very important
– They would appreciate if practitioners could invest extra time and help,
even possess „psychological skills“ to carry through individual coaching
and job councelling, helping them with daily but also low self-esteem
problems
SE-TOOL
Conclusions from the Interview with
Participants for the Dimensions of the
SE-Tool
Most important to participants are:
→ Values and roles
→Teaching, training and learning experiences
→ Recognition and accreditation of skills
→
(Re-)Integration into society
SE-TOOL
Results of Interview with Those
Responsible
Most of those responsible:
• Appreciate quality management systems and their monitoring
of processes especially for administration issues and
processes between intersections
• Consider auality assurance as a big financial issue:
institutions are oblidged to meet quality standards and
spend time, effort and in many cases even extra personell
beeing responsibe for quality assurance processes
• Would like to have more time for internal cooperation and
regional networking
• Would appreciate self-evaluation methods to be used in
their institution as a extendable and dynamic systems for
team processes
SE-TOOL
Conclusions from the
Interview with Those Responsible
for the Dimensions of the SE-Tool
Most important for those responsible are:
• Finances and administration
• Cooperation and networking
• Self-evaluation as a basis for team processes
SE-TOOL
Results of Interview with
Stakeholders
Stakeholders state:
→ Certification ISO 9000ff is not suitable for the educational sector
•
A need for a federal regulation of CVT and reform of CVT laws:
-
Universal CVT provision and sufficient financing
-
State wide critera for quality factors
-
A holistic approach to quality and efficiency development
-
Reliable access-, accreditation- and certification
-
Consensus and cooperation between CVT institutions
- Labour policy should not only aim at the fast re-
integration into the labour market but also at long-time
qualification and social integration of unemployed
SE-TOOL
Results of Interview with
Stakeholders
Stakeholders state further:
A need for a public report on:
- Structures of CVT institutions and their financing
- CVT offers
- Work conditions in CVT, professional background and
further qualification possibilities of actors
- Survey on the social selection for the acces to and
possibilities of deregulation in CVT
QASE
SE-TOOL
Conclusions from the Interview
with Stakeholders for the Work
Areas of the Tool
Stakeholders focus their concept of quality
development on:
→ Cooperation and networking
→ (Reliable) access-, accreditation- and certification
→ Society and work conditions
Dimensions of a Self-Evaluation-tool
according to the Survey
Society and
Work
Conditions
Values and Roles
SE-TOOL
Sociel Integration,
Accreditation
Learning, Teaching
(Training)
Self- evaluation
and Reflection
Collaborative
Networks
SE-TOOL
Test
• Here you can fill in your questions