Institute of Chartered Accountant India- WIRC- Baroda Controversies in TDS C.A. Mahesh Sarda 10th June, 2017 Summary • TDS Process Flow • Framework – Key sections covered under Chapter XVII-B • Brief background – Sections 192, 194C, 194H, 194-I, 194-IA, 194J, 195 • Section 197 and 197A • Case Studies 2 TDS Process Flow Accrual of expense / payment of invoice (whichever is earlier) No Whether PAN of payee is available? Deduct tax @ 20% or higher rate, as may be applicable Yes Determine the nature of payment (e.g. rent, royalty, commission, fees for professional Service etc.) Whether nil certificate / lower deduction certificate provided by payee? No Yes Is certificate covers the payment Yes Deduct tax at the rate specified under consideration and is in certificate valid for that period? No Determine and deduct the tax at the appropriate rates Deposit of tax with the government treasury in challan no. ITNS 281 E.g. payment to contractor (194C) - 2%; payment of office rent (194I) - 10% payment for use of equipment or professional fees (194J) - 10%; • For the period April to February - on or before 7th of succeeding month in which tax is deducted • For the month of March - on or before 30th April File quarterly withholding tax return on or before the due dates Issue TDS certificate in Form No.16A • Except payments under section 194-IA (due date extended by CBDT Circular dated 29 April 2016) • AO may permit quarterly deposit of TDS for payments under section 192, 194A, 194D, 194H Framework – Key sections covered under Chapter XVII-B Section 192 192A Relevant Provision Salary Payment of accumulated balance due to an employee 193 Interest on securities 194 Dividends 194A Interest other than Interest on securities 194C Payments to contractors 194H Commission or brokerage 194-I Rent 194IA Payment on transfer of certain immovable property other than agricultural land 194J Fees for professional or technical services 195 Other Sums – Payments to non-residents 4 Section 192 TDS on Salary 5 Section 192 – TDS on Salary • Only section which allows estimation – taxes required to be withheld on estimated income ~ Section 192(1) • TDS to be deducted only at the time of payment of salary. No question of tax deduction if employee’s account is credited with salary due to him but not paid • Taxability determined by essence of contract (i.e. existence of employeremployee relationship) and not nomenclature • TDS to be deducted as per ‘average rate of tax’ computed as per the ‘rates in force’ i.e. slab rates applicable to individuals ~ Section 192(1B) • Income from other heads declared by employee to be considered ~ Section 192(2B) - No loss to be considered - Only loss from house property could be reduced at the time of estimation of income • Employer to furnish to the employee Form No. 16 giving details of salary and TDS deducted 6 Section 192 – TDS on Salary • Employer to obtain evidence or proof or particulars of prescribed claims (including claim for set off of loss) in such form and manner as may be prescribed ~ Section 192(2D) • CBDT circular on salary no. 20/2015 dated 2 December 2015. Annual CBDT circular on salary to be followed in allowing exemptions / deductions. Circular for current FY yet to be issued (reference may be made to last year’s circular till that time) • Rule 26C introduced w.e.f 1 June 2016 for furnishing evidence of claims by employee for tax deduction ~ Notification No. 30/2016 dated 29 April 2016 • Form 12BB prescribed for furnishing details Nature of claims Evidence or particulars House Rent Allowance Name, address and PAN of the landlord(s) where aggregate rent paid during the previous year exceeds ` 100,000 Leave Travel concession or assistance Evidence of expenditure Deduction of interest under income from house property Name, address and PAN of the lender Deduction under Chapter VI-A Evidence of investment of expenditure 7 Section 192 – TDS on salary Average rate of income- tax – Key points • Average rate computed on the basis of “rates in force” for the financial year of payment • TDS to be deducted on monthly basis in equal instalments ~ Circular No.8/2013 dated 10 October 2013 • Employer to adjust the withholding for payment like bonus, ex-gratia, increment in salary, etc. during the middle of the year ~ Section 192(3) • Whether TDS is required to be deducted uniformly throughout the year? Yes. However, adjustment can be made for short deduction or excess deduction as per section 192(3) Vinsons v. ITO (89 ITD 267) (Mum ITAT) – Assessee reasonably estimated the annual income and deducted tax on it. Hence, interest under section 201(1A) was held to be wrongly charged 8 Section 192 – General Issues • Whether TDS to be deducted on salary paid to non-resident? • Whether a foreign employer is required to deduct taxes? CIT v. Eli Lilly & Co. (India) (P) Ltd. (312 ITR 225) (SC) - Foreign company paying income which is chargeable to tax in India should comply WHT requirements - Salary paid outside India to expat employees seconded to India subject to WHT provisions and it is obligation of either the foreign company or its Indian counterparts to comply with the Indian WHT provisions if salary chargeable to tax in India • Whether foreign tax credit can be considered while computing TDS under section 192? Debatable issue Section 192 of the Act is silent as to whether FTC may be considered by the employer at the time of TDS. 9 Section 192 – General Issues • Per diem Allowance: Not subject to TDS under section 192 Kolkatta tribunal in case of ITO Vs Spartrshi Ghos (48 SOT 522) • Whether Hypo Tax allowed as deduction: Hypo tax is a notional tax based on income in the home country. The expat who is deputed to host country is assured of same level of take on pay. Therefore, his remuneration in the host country is worked out in such a manner that his net pay after deduction of tax of host country is equal to net take on pay in the home country. As the employee has worked in host country is not liable to pay any tax in Home country. The deduction of hypo tax from his gross salary is notional. In fact his entitlement is for salary equal to net take on pay. The issue which arise for consideration is whether deduction of hypo tax is to be given effect to in computing his net income under the head salary or not. 10 Section 192 – General Issues If total tax on salary comes to Rs 1500 in USA while that in India at Rs 1000, then as per Tax equalization Policy, Rs 500 is to be substracted as hypothetical tax in order to determine total emoluments of the assesse. CIT v. Dr Percy Batlivala 2009 taxmann.com 1028 Delhi HC. Favourable to asseessee~ ACIT-Circle-48(1) V. Robert Arthur Keltz 2013 35 taxmann.com 424 (Delhi-Trib) Member Firms and DTTL: Insert appropriate copyright (Go Header & Footer to edit this text) 11 Section 194A Interest other than interest on securities 12 Interest other than interest on securities Applicability Payer Interest other Any person than interest on securities like interest on fixed deposits, interest on Loans and advances other than banks Payee Rate of TDS Exemptions A resident person 10% •Tax not deductible if payment/credi t does not exceed Rs. 10,000 in case of bank interest, Co operative bank interest, interest on SCSS •Rs. 5000 in any other case 13 Section 194A - General Issues •Whether discounting charges are in the nature of interest on which tax is deductible Cheque discounting charges are different from interest payments and the provisions of section 194A are not attracted. – ITO v. A.S. Babu Sah [2003] 86 ITD283 Mad. •Deposits in banks in the name of the Registrar to the supreme court/High Court during pending litigation? Interest on FDR made in the name of Registrar general of the court or the depositor of the fund in the directions of the court, will not be subjected to TDS till the matter is decided by the Court. However, Once the Court decides the ownership of the money lying in the fixed deposits, the provisions of section 194A will apply to the recipient of the income. Circular No 23/2015 based on Delhi High court Judgement dated 11.11.2014 in the case of UCO Bank 14 Section 194A - General Issues •Whether interest on overdue purchase bills is interest? Payments which have direct link and immediate nexus with the trading liability connected with the delayed purchase payments, will not fall within the category of interest as defined in section 2(28A). Therefore, interest on delayed payment of purchase bills is not subject to TDS under section 194A- Sri Venkatesh Paper Agencies(Hye.) (P.) Ltd. V. CIT[2012] 15 Section 194C Payment to contractors 16 Section 194C – Payment to contractors Applicability Payer Payee Rate of TDS Exemptions Any sum payable for carrying out any work (including supply of labour) in pursuance of a contract between contractor and specified person Any person [except Individual or HUF or AOP or BOI not liable for tax audit] Resident Individual or HUF 1% Any other resident 2% • Payment of transport charges made to contractor satisfying 3 conditions: - Recipient engaged in the business of transport (plying, hiring or leasing or leasing goods carriages); - Recipient owns 10 or less goods carriage at any time during FY; - Recipient furnishes a declaration alongwith PAN • Payments exclusively for personal purposes of individuals and HUF 17 Section 194C – Payment to contractors • No TDS if: Amount paid / payable or credited / likely to be credited to contractor / subcontractor does not exceed ` 30,000 in a single instance; Total amount paid / payable or credited / likely to be credited to contractor / sub-contractor during the FY does not exceed ` 1,00,000 – w.e.f 1 June 2016 – earlier ` 75,000) • Once any single payment exceeds the applicable monetary limit, tax must be deducted on the whole amount and not on the amount in excess of such monetary limit • Similarly, where aggregate payments to the same payee during the FY at any stage exceeds the applicable monetary limit, tax must be deducted on the amount of aggregate payment and not on the amount in excess of such monetary limit • Even oral contract is sufficient for invoking TDS provisions – ITO v. Gopal Rajput (156 ITD 827) (Mum ITAT) 18 Section 194C – Payment to contractors Payments to contractors / sub-contractors inter alia includes following contracts: • Advertising contracts; • Broadcasting and telecasting including production of programmes for such broadcasting or telecasting; • Carriage of goods or passengers by any mode of transport (except railways); • Catering; • Manufacturing or supplying a product as per customer specification by using material purchased from the customer, does not include manufacturing or supplying a product as per customer specification by using material purchased from a person, other than such customer • Works contracts (construction / renovation of buildings, repairs of vehicle, etc.); • Supply of labour; 19 Section 194C – General issues Meaning of ‘any work’: As per Explanation (iv) to section 194C, “Work” Shall include(a) Advertising; (b) Broadcasting and telecasting including production of programmes for such broadcasting or telecasting; (c) Carriage of goods or passengers by any mode of transport other than railways; (d) Catering; (e) Manufacturing or supplying a product according to the requirement or specification of a customer by using material purchased from such customer, But does not include manufacturing or supplying a product according to the requirement or specification of a customer by using material purchased from a person, other than such customer. 20 Section 194C – General issues • Works contract v. Contract for supply of goods BDA Ltd v. ITO (TDS) (281 ITR 99) (Bom HC) ~ Printing done as per specifications is a contract for sale and not contract for work, therefore no TDS under section 194C CIT v. Hindustan Lever Limited (306 ITR 25) (Guj HC) ~ When contract is for supply of materials, it cannot be termed as a contract for labour and provisions of section 194C do not apply CIT v. Reebok India Co (306 ITR 124) (Del HC) ~ sale of goods does not attract section 194C • Reimbursements Circular No. 715 dated 8 August 1995 (FAQ 30) ~ Section 194C refers to ‘any sum paid’. Reimbursements cannot be deducted out of the bill amount for TDS • Procurement of Orders Circular No. 715 dated August 8, 1995 ~ Rendering services for procurement of orders is not covered by section 194C (but by section 194J) 21 Section 194C – General issues (contd.) • Payments for sponsorship events Circular No. 715 dated 8 August 1995 (FAQ 18) ~ Sponsorship is in essence, advertising, therefore gets covered by TDS under section 194C • Maintenance contract including supply of spares Circular No. 715 dated 8 August 1995 (FAQ 29) ~ Routine, normal maintenance contracts which includes supply of spares will be covered under section 194C • Payment to foreign shipping companies Circular No. 723 dated 19 September 1995 As section 172 overrides other provisions of the Act, provisions of section 194C not applicable to non-resident shipping business. Even where payments are made to shipping agents of non-resident ship owners or charterers for carriage of passengers etc., shipped at a port in India, the agents act on behalf of the non-resident, provisions of section 194C will not apply 22 Section 194C – General issues (contd.) • Payment to production house for production of programmes as per the specifications of the TV channel Circular No. 4/2016 dated 29 February 2016 ~ Specifically covered in definition of work and clarified by CBT Circular No. 715 • Divisible and indivisible works contract for supply and installation TDS on composite contracts which are divisible consisting payments for supply of materials / payments for execution of works contract having common purchase order to be deducted only in respect of consideration attributable to the works contract. Payments towards supply of material etc. to be excluded • Cooling charges paid to cold storage owners Circular No. 1/2008 dated 10 January 2008 ~ The main function of the cold storage is to preserve perishable goods by means of mechanical process, and storage of such goods is only incidental in nature. The customer is also not given any right to use any demarcated space/place or the machinery of the cold store and thus does not become tenant. Therefore, the provisions of section 194I is not applicable. Since the arrangement is basically of contractual in nature, the provision of section 194C will be applicable. 23 Section 194C – General issues (contd.) • Advertising agency making payment to their models, artists etc. Circular No. 714 dated 3 August 1995 ~ When an advertising agency makes payment to their models, artists, photographers, etc. TDS to be deducted under section 194J and not 194C • Hoarding Circular No. 715 dated 8 August 1995 ~ Contract for putting up a hoarding is in the nature of advertising contract and provisions of 194C will apply. However, if a person takes a particular space on rent and thereafter sublets the same fully or in part for putting up a hoarding, he would be liable to deduct TDS under section 194-I and not 194C • Publicity of a brand or logo Payment made towards publicity of a brand or logo brings commercial benefit, assumes character of ‘advertisement’ liable for TDS under section 194C ~ DCIT v. Sahara India Commercial Corpn. Ltd (67 SOT 318) (Luck. ITAT) 24 Section 194C – General issues (contd.) • Landing and parking charges paid at airports Payment of landing and parking charges by an airlines to Airport Authority to be treated as payment to contractors under section 194C and not as rent under section 194-I ~ CIT v. Singapore Airlines Ltd (358 ITR 237) (Mad HC) affirmed by SC in Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v. CIT (377 ITR 372) (SC) 25 Section 194H Commission or brokerage 26 Section 194H – Commission or Brokerage Applicability Payer Payee Commission or Brokerage (other than 194D which deals with insurance commission) Any person Resident [except Individual or HUF not liable for tax audit] Rate of TDS 5% Exemptions • Aggregate payment during the year does not exceed ` 15,000 • Payments of brokerage on purchase / sale of securities • BSNL / MTNL not required to deduct TDS from commission to their public call franchisees (i.e. owners of PCOs) Commission or brokerage includes any payment received or receivable, directly or indirectly, by a person acting on behalf of another person for services rendered (not being professional services) or for any services in the course of buying or selling of goods or in relation to any transaction relating to any asset, valuable article or thing, not being securities 27 Section 194H – General issues • Relationship of “agency” between parties ~ a pre-requisite for taxability of income as commission • Transactions on P2P basis are not covered • Incentives paid, whether commission CIT v. Intervet India (P) Ltd (364 ITR 238) (Bom HC) – Incentive to distributors / stockists on meeting sales target on P2P basis could not be treated as commission under section 194H National Panasonic India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (3 SOT 16) (Delhi ITAT) – Trade discounts, regional sales promotion, key dealer incentive, fast track bonus etc. are trade incentives, cannot be treated as commission to attract section 194H • Discount given to stamp vendors Discount given to stamp vendors for purchasing stamps in bulk quantity qualifies as cash discount, does not fall within commission or brokerage and hence no TDS to be deducted under section 194H – CIT v. Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors Association v. UOI (348 ITR 378) (SC) 28 Section 194H – General issues • Discount to SIM card dealers Discount offered by assessee to its distributors was in the nature of commission liable for TDS under section 194H CIT v. Idea Cellular (325 ITR 148) (Del HC); Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd v. ACIT (332 ITR 255) (Ker HC);p Bharti Cellular Ltd v. ACIT (354 ITR 507) (Cal HC);p Hutchison Telecom East Ltd v. CIT (232 Taxman 665) (Cal HC)p Contrary view after considering above decisions Sale of SIM cards / recharge coupons at discounted rate to distributors ~ not commission and therefore not liable to TDS under section 194H – Bharti Airtel Ltd v. DCIT (372 ITR 33) (Kar HC) Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd v. ACIT (60 taxmann.com 214) (Ahd ITAT) – After considering all the above HC decisions, ITAT held that view favourable to the assessee to be followed 29 Section 194H - General issues (contd) • Travel agent commission Airlines issued tickets to its travel agents at a concessional price. Transaction between airlines and travel agents was that of P2P and difference in price was discount, hence transaction does not fall within the ambit of section 194H - CIT v. Singapore Airlines Ltd (319 ITR 29) (Del HC) Amount which agents earned over and above fixed minimum commercial price would neither amount to commission nor brokerage at the hands of the agent Qatar Airways (332 ITR 253) (Bom HC) • Payments by TV channels and publishing houses to advertising companies for procuring or canvassing for advertisements? Circular No.5/2016 dated 29 February 2016 - Relationship between media company and advertising company is on P2P basis, therefore section 194H does not apply 30 Section 194H - General issues (contd) • Bank Guarantee: When Bank issues bank guarantee on behalf of a customer, there is no principal agent relationship between bank and customer and, consequently section 194H is no applicable.- Efftronics Systems (P.) Ltd v. ACIT (2016) Member Firms and DTTL: Insert appropriate copyright (Go Header & Footer to edit this text) 31 Section 194-I Rent 32 Section 194-I - Rent Applicability Payer Payee Use of any machinery or plant or equipment Any person [except Individual or HUF not liable for tax audit] Resident Use of any land or building or land appurtenant to a building or furniture or fittings Rate of TDS 2% Exemptions Aggregate payments to payee during a financial year does not exceed ` 180,000 10% Besides on land or land and building, tax will be deductible for leasing or hiring of machinery, plant, equipment, furniture and fittings whether given separately or not and whether or not any or all of the above are owned by the payee 33 Section 194I – Rent • Use is the most important factor in deciding whether payments are made for hire of equipment / land / building / furniture and fittings • Payment made for provision of any service cannot be termed as rent chargeable to TDS under section 194-I for example business center services, cab services, cold storage services (without any demarcation of area) TDS on service-tax component • Service-tax paid by tenant does not partake the nature of income. Landlord acts as a collecting agency on Government’s behalf for collection of service-tax. Service-tax amount to be excluded while calculating TDS under section 194-I ~ Circular No 4/2008 dated 28 April 2008 • Wherever in the agreement terms / contract between the payer and payee, service-tax component in the amount payable to resident is indicated separately, TDS to be deducted on the amount paid / payable excluding such service-tax component ~ Circular No 1/2014 dated 13 January 2014 Swachh Bharat Cess and Krishi Kalyan Cess ~ similar to service tax and no TDS applicable on such payments 34 Section 194I – Rent – General Issues TDS on payments for hotel accommodation • Payments made for hotel accommodation taken on regular basis will be in the nature of rent subject to TDS • Earmarked rooms let out for a specified rate and specified period, would be construed to be accommodation made available on regular basis • Similar would be the case where room or set of rooms are not earmarked, but hotel has a legal obligation to provide such type of rooms Rate contract agreements • Contract for providing specified types of hotel rooms at pre-determined rates during an agreed period • Corporate employers, tour operators and travel agents enter into agreements with hotels for fixing room tariffs for their executives / customers • Cannot be said to be accommodation taken on regular basis as no obligation by hotel to provide room(s). Not subject to TDS- Circular No 05/2002,dated July 30,2002 35 Section 194I – Rent – General Issues • Adjustable deposits, refundable / non-refundable deposits Circular No. 718 dated 22 August 1995 (FAQ 2) Any deposit given by the tenant which is adjustable against future rent is in the nature of advance rent and subject to TDS TDS to be deducted as non-refundable deposit represents consideration for the use of land or building etc. partaking the nature of rent. No TDS if deposit is refundable • TDS on advance rent Circular No.5/2001 dated 2 March 2001 ~ Where advance rent is spread over more than one FY and TDS is deducted thereon, credit shall be allowed in the same proportion in which such income is offered for taxation 36 Section 194I – Rent – General Issues Sharing of office and utilizing other services • Payment made for use and occupation of premises with furniture and fixture falling within the parameters of rent, hence 194-I applicable – Wipro GE Medical System Ltd v. ITO (TDS) (3 SOT 627) (Bang ITAT) • Cars hired from time to time by assessee for its business without any control over vehicles No specific cars identified and earmarked for assessee, only arrangement for providing cars of a particular category to facilitate transportation of employees and guests from one place to another, provisions of 194C were applicable and not 194-I – TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd v. ITO (TDS) (43 SOT 215) (Mum ITAT) • Limit of ` 180,000 per annum, whether would apply separately for each coowner of property? Circular No. 715 dated 8 August 1995 (FAQ 21) Limit of ` 180,000 will apply to each payee / co-owner separately if there are number of payees, each having definite and ascertainable share in the property 37 Section 194-IA Payment of transfer of certain immovable property other than agricultural land 38 Section 194-IA Applicability Payer Payee Purchase of immovable property Any person (other than those referred to in 194LA) Resident Rate 1% Exemptions • Rural agricultural land • Where the sale consideration for the property is less than ` 50 lacs • Section effective from 1 June 2013 • Section 194-IA not applicable if seller is non-resident • Residential status of the transferee is immaterial • Not necessary that property is situated in India • TDS to be deducted irrespective of whether immovable property is held as capital asset or stock-in trade by the buyer and seller • If sellers jointly own a property, section 194-IA is attracted even if each coowner’s consideration is less than ` 50 lacs • No TAN required 39 Section 194-IA - Mechanics • Buyer to deduct TDS @ 1% and then pay to the government’s treasury on account of the seller • TDS to be deposited to the government’s treasury within 30 days (w.e.f 1 June 2016, earlier 7 days) from the end of the month in which deduction is made and to be accompanied by challan-cum-statement in Form 26QB • Mandatory to make online payment of TDS. Link provided by NSDL website to electronically deposit such payments • Alternate mechanism if buyer does not have net-banking facility Ø Fill information online and then opt for e-tax payment on subsequent date option; Ø Once form completed, acknowledgement will be generated; Ø Visit the bank for payment furnishing the acknowledgment number; Ø Bank will use TIN website to retrieve payment information based on acknowledgment number and then proceed to make payment electronically; • TDS certificate to be issued by buyer to seller in Form 16B within 15 days from the due date of depositing tax. Form 16B can be downloaded from TRACES website 40 Section 194-IA – Points to be noted • TDS shall be deducted even if the transaction takes place before 1 June 2013 and payment is made after 1 June 2013 • If credit to transferor’s account has been given before 1 June 2013 then provisions of section 194-IA will not apply, even if payment has been made after 1 June 2013 (Payment or credit whichever is earlier) • Under construction properties ~ TDS to be deducted on installments paid on or after 1 June 2013, if aggregate purchase consideration more than ` 50 lacs. No TDS to be deducted in respect of installments paid before 1 June 2013 • Threshold limit of ` 50 lacs is with reference to each property. If property transaction involves more than one buyer and share of each buyer in the property is less than ` 50 lacs but value of the property in aggregate more than ` 50 lacs, provisions of section 194-IA will be applicable. TDS will be deducted and deposited by each buyer in respect of their respective share in the property • Transaction involving more than one seller, TDS will be deducted in respect of amount paid to each seller and their respective PAN will be quoted while making payment through Form 26QB 41 Section 194J Fees for Professional or Technical services 42 Section 194J – Fees for Professional / Technical Services Applicability • • • • • Fees for Professional / Technical services Remuneration or fees or commission to Director, other than salary Royalty Non compete fee Non sharing of intellectual property (knowhow, patents copyrights, trade marks etc.) Payer Payee Any person Resident [except Individual or HUF not liable for tax audit] Rate 10% (2% in case of a payee engaged in the business of call centre Exemption • Payment of professional services exclusively for personal purposes of Individuals and HUF • Aggregate payment during a FY does not exceed ` 30,000 43 Section 194J – Fees for Professional / Technical Services • “Professional Services” defined to include legal, medical, engineering, architect, accountancy or technical consultancy, interior decorator, advertising or any other profession notified under section 44AA or under this section by CBDT* • *Notification No 88/2008 dated 21 August 2008 • Sports persons, umpires and referees, coaches and trainers, team physicians and physiotherapists, event managers, commentators, anchors and sports columnists • Meaning of “Royalty and Technical Services” ~ same as per Explanation 2 to section 9(i)(vi) and section 9(i)(vii) respectively • Sitting Fees paid to director ~ TDS @ 10% without any threshold limit Fees paid through regular banking channels to any CA, lawyer, advocate or solicitor who is resident in India by non-residents who do not have any agent or business connection or PE in India may not be subject to TDS ~ Circular No. 726 dated 18 October 1995 44 Section 194J – Fees for Professional / Technical Services Payment to hospitals by TPAs on behalf of insurance companies for settling medical / insurance claims with hospitals Circular No 8/2009 dated 24 November 2009 • Services rendered by hospitals to various patients are primarily medical services, hence provisions of section 194J applicable • TPAs making payment on behalf of insurance companies to hospitals for settlement of medical / insurance claims under various schemes including cashless schemes are liable to deduct tax on all payments to hospitals Payment to consultant doctors by hospitals - TDS under section 194J and not 192 CIT (TDS) v. Grant Medical Foundation (375 ITR 49) (Bom HC); CIT (TDS) v. Apollo Hospitals International Ltd (359 ITR 78) (Guj HC) 45 Section 194J – Fees for Professional / Technical Services • Transaction charges paid to stock exchange CIT v. Kotak Securities Ltd (383 ITR 1) (SC) Service made available by BSE Online Trading (BOLT) System for which transaction charges are paid by members of BSE are common services that every member of Stock Exchange is required to avail of to carry out trading in securities in Stock Exchange Such services do not amount to 'technical services' provided by Stock Exchange, and therefore, no TDS would be deductible under section 194J Decision of Bombay High Court in CIT v. Kotak Securities Ltd (245 CTR 3) (Bom HC) overruled • Reimbursements Circular No. 715 dated 8 August 1995 (FAQ 30) ~ Section 194J refers to ‘any sum paid’. Reimbursements cannot be deducted out of the bill amount for TDS 46 Section 194J – Fees for Professional / Technical Services • Human Interface Services provided by machines / robots not technical services as human interface is absent ~ CIT v. Bharti Cellular Ltd (319 ITR 139) (Del HC)p Where facility was provided through machines or sophisticated equipment only which did not involve human element, would not amount to rendering of technical service ~ ITO (TDS) v. Hindustan Zinc Ltd (62 SOT 11) (Jodh ITAT) 47 Section 194J – Fees for Professional / Technical Services • Payment to Non resident for employee secondment as FTS, rejects salary reimbursement plea~ Where in terms of “secondment agreement” entered into by the assesse with overseas companies, employees of those companies used their technical knowledge and skills while assisting assesse in conducting its business of quality control and management, the amount reimbursed by the assesse to overseas companies towards salaries of seconded employees amounts to fee for technical services” ~ Centrica India Offshore (P) Ltd v. CIT[2014], Flughafen Zurich AG [TS-96-ITAT-2017(Bang)] Contrary ruling –CIT v Mahanagar Gas Ltd [2016] 69 taxmann.com 321(Mum.) Member Firms and DTTL: Insert appropriate copyright (Go Header & Footer to edit this text) 48 Section 195 Payment to Non-Residents 49 Section 195 – Payment to Non-Residents Basic principle Source Based Income taxable in the state of source or where situs is situated Residence Based Income taxable in the state of residence of the tax payer Scope of taxation in India – Combination of residence and source rule GVK Industries Ltd v. ITO (371 ITR 453) (SC)p 50 Section 195 – Payment to Non-Residents Features: • Payer: Any person • Payee: Non-resident, not being a company or a foreign company • Payments: Interest or any other sum (other than salaries) chargeable under the Income-tax Act • Time of deduction: Payment or credit, whichever is earlier • Threshold: No minimum threshold exemption • Subject Matter: TDS • Rate of TDS: Rates in force Obligation to comply with WHT provision arises irrespective of whether • payer is a resident or non-resident; • non-resident has a residence, place of business, business connection or any other presence in India 51 Section 195 – Payment to Non-Residents 195(1) • • • • payment by any person responsible / to a non resident interest or any other sum chargeable to tax payment or credit whichever is earlier / at rates in force other than salary and dividend referred in section 115-O • application to AO by payer if it considers whole of sum is not income chargeable in the hands of the recipient 195(2) • application to the AO by payee viz. Foreign Banking Company or nonresident having branch in India for lower or Nil withholding – 195(3) & (4) 195(3), (4),(5) 195(6) • powers to CBDT to make rules – 195(5) • Payer to furnish information in prescribed form viz. Form 15CA/15CB in respect of any sum whether chargeable or not under the Act 52 Comparative Analysis – Sections 195(2), 195(3) and 197 Particulars 195(2) 195(3) 197 Application by Payer Payee Payee Purpose To determine portion of income liable for WHT To receive specific payment without deduction of tax. Certificate valid till expiry of period mentioned therein To obtain NIL / lower WHT certificate for all receipts. Valid till expiry of period mentioned therein Applicability Specified Payments Specified Receipts All receipts Whether appealable under section 248? Yes – where tax deposited by payer No No Yes Yes Revision under Yes section 264 53 Section 195 – Payment to Non-Residents Steps for determination of TDS Section Documents viz. Agreements / invoices • Check whether payment covered within section 195 • Other sections for eg. 192, 194LC, 194LD etc. • Examine the agreements determine nature of payment and invoices to Taxability under the Act • Based on documents, determine nature of payments and applicable provisions under the Act • Certificate under section 195(2) / 195(3) / 197 Taxability under the tax treaty • Determine whether the payee eligible for treaty benefits and whether relevant documents obtained to grant treaty relief TDS rate • Determine applicable TDS rate under Act or treaty (whichever is more beneficial), also whether grossing-up applies 54 Section 195 – Payment to Non-Residents Under the Act Section 5(2) ~ Scope of Total Income in case of Non-Resident • Income received or deemed to be received in India; or • Income accrues or arises or deemed to accrue or arise to him in India Section 9 ~ Income deemed to accrue or arise in India Income said to be deemed to accrue or arise in India if accruing or arising directly or indirectly, through • any business connection in India; or • from any property in India; or • from any asset or source of income in India; or • transfer of a capital asset situated in India • also includes any share or interest in a company or entity registered or incorporated outside India which derives its value substantially from assets in India Under the Treaty Section 90(2) • Provisions of Act or treaty, whichever is beneficial • Sums not chargeable to tax in India on account of treaty benefit shall continue to remain outside the ambit of section 195 55 Section 195 – Payment to Non-Residents Sum chargeable to tax GE India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd v. CIT (327 ITR 456) (SC) Where payment made by resident to non-resident, was not chargeable to tax in India, no tax is deductible at source even though assessee has not made an application before AO CBDT Instruction No 2/2014 dated 26 February 2014 Where assessee fails to deduct tax under section 195, AO required to determine income component involved in the sum on which WHT liability is to be computed and payer would be considered as being in default for non-withholding of taxes only in relation to such income component Illustrative payments to non-residents not chargeable under the Act • Payments on capital account, for eg. gifts, loans, repayment of loans, etc. • Sums which are on revenue account and which are not chargeable to tax at all under the Act in the hands of the recipient • Sums which fall within the scope of section 5, but which are expressly exempt under the Act. for eg. dividend income 56 Section 195 – Key Aspects Amended provisions under the Act cannot be unilaterally read into the treaty • • • • • • CIT v. Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (310 ITR 320) (Bom HC);p DIT v. Nokia Networks OY (358 ITR 259) (Del HC); Sanofi Pasteur Holding SA v. Dept of Revenue (354 ITR 316) (AP HC); DIT v. Infrasoft Ltd. (220 Taxman 273) (Del HC); B4U International Holdings Ltd. v. DCIT (52 SOT 545) (Mum ITAT) Verizon Communications Singapore Pte Ltd v. ITO (361 ITR 575) (Mad HC) Amended definition of royalty under the Act would apply to India–Singapore tax treaty Payment in kind Assessee liable to deduct tax under section 195 on payment made to non-resident even though payment is not made in cash but in kind ~ Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. v. CIT (325 ITR 540) (SC) Net Payment received Assessee liable to deduct tax under section 195 even under an arrangement where he receives only net payment from other party after deducting commission / management fees etc. ~ Raymond Ltd. v. DCIT (86 ITD 791) (Mum ITAT) Exchange Rate Rule 26 ~ SBI TT Buying rate as on the date of deduction of tax 57 Section 195 – Key Aspects Rates in force • Section 195 refers to deduction of tax at “rates in force” • Defined in section 2(37A) • TDS to be deducted at rates in force ~ Circular No 728 dated 30 October 1995 • Rates specified in Finance Act of the relevant year (refer Part II of the First Schedule to the Finance Act) OR rates specified in the tax treaty entered with respective country, whichever is more beneficial • During the period when Finance Bill is pending approval, rates in force for the preceding year or rate proposed for the current year, whichever is more favourable will be applicable ~ Section 294 • Applicability of surcharge (SC) and education cess (EC)? Rates prescribed by tax treaty generally inclusive of SC and EC • Parke Davis & Co LLC v. ACIT (62 SOT282) (Mum ITAT) • Sunil Motiani v. ITO (59 SOT 37) (Mum ITAT) 58 Section 195 – Key Aspects Non furnishing of PAN Section 2(37A) Rates of Income-tax specified in Finance Act or rates specified in the tax treaty entered with respective country Section 90 Provisions of Act or treaty, whichever is more beneficial Section 206AA If no PAN, TDS to be deducted at higher of the following: • Rates specified in Act; • Rates in force; • 20% Based on above, 206AA would prevail over section 90 59 Section 195 – Key Aspects Non furnishing of PAN • DDIT v. Serum Institute of India Ltd (68 SOT 254) (Pune ITAT) Where TDS is deducted on the strength of beneficial provisions of the tax treaty, provisions of section 206AA of the Act cannot be invoked to insist on tax deduction @ 20%, having regard to overriding nature of section 90(2) • DCIT v. Infosys BPO Ltd (154 ITD 816) (Bang ITAT) No scope of tax deduction @ 20% as per section 206AA where treaty benefit is available to the assessee Based on above decisions, one may contend that section 90 shall override section 206AA Effective 1 June 2016, TDS not to be deducted at higher rate in case of NR not holding PAN, subject to prescribed condition 60 Section 195 – Key Aspects Grossing up – Section 195A • If payee bears tax liability i.e. payment is “net of tax”, then for computing TDS, income should be grossed up Particulars Amount (in `) Amount payable to NR (sum chargeable to tax in India) 100 Tax rate 10% Grossed-up amount (100)*(100/(100-10)) 111.11 Tax payable (111.11*10%) 11.11 Net remittance amount 100 • Applicability of section 195A in cases of presumptive taxation (section 44B, section 44BB, 44BBB) Not applicable ~ CIT v. ONGC (276 ITR 585) (Utt HC) 61 Section 195 – Key Aspects Grossing up – Section 195A • Whether grossing-up required if payment made net of tax to foreign company which does not have a PAN in India? Income could be grossed up using applicable rate e.g. 10% and tax could be withheld @ 20% Ex. Total amount paid net of tax ` 100, income increased to ` 111.11 (grossed up by 10%), TDS to be deducted @ 20% on to ` 111.11 = ` 22.22 Bosch Ltd v. ITO (141 ITD 38) (Bang ITAT) 62 Section 195(6) and Rule 37BB Furnishing of information / CA certificate • Information regarding remittance made to NR’s needs to be furnished in prescribed form and manner as per Rule 37BB Form 15CA ~ Information to be furnished by remitter Form 15CB ~ Certificate to be obtained from a CA by remitter • Forms 15CA / 15CB revised vide CBDT Notification dated 16 December 2015 • Amended notification lays down that information regarding all foreign remittances are required to be furnished, whether or not such sum was chargeable to tax under the Act • Specific Exemptions – remittance made by individuals under Liberalised Remittance Scheme of RBI and does nor require RBI’s prior approval; Remittance in the nature as provided in the ‘specified list’. Currently, 33 transactions are provided 63 Section 195(6) and Rule 37BB • Form 15CA consists of 4 parts: Payment chargeable Part A Payment(s) made during FY does not exceed ` 500,000. No form 15CB required for such payments Part B Certificate for lower WHT has been obtained in respect of payments made during FY Part C CA certificate obtained in Form 15CB in respect of payments made during FY Payment not-chargeable Part D Payment(s) made during FY which is not chargeable under the provisions of the Act 64 Step wise procedure for foreign remittance Obtain certificate of Accountant (Form 15CB Electronically upload the remittance details in Form 15CA Take print out of filled form (15CA) with system generated acknowledgment number Print out of the undertaking form (15CA) is signed Submit the signed paper undertaking to AD alongwith Form 15CB in duplicate. AD remits the amount 65 Form 15CB • Certificate issued by a CA wherein it specifies the documents verified by him • Following documents are required while issuing Form 15CB Agreement entered between the parties (payer and payee) Invoice / Documentary evidence Challan evidencing payment of WHT (if tax payable) TRC in case of claiming treaty benefit Form 10F (where specific details as required by Government of India is not mentioned in TRC, in case of claiming treaty benefits) No PE declaration 66 Form 10F and TRC Name of the beneficiary Address of the beneficiary PAN (if allotted) Nationality TIN of the beneficiary Period of residential status Prescribed format of TRC was done away by FA 2013, it did provide that additional information and documentation shall be furnished separately Rule 21AB consequently amended ~ Information to be furnished in Form 10F and sufficient documentation to substantiate shall be maintained Form 10F only an adhoc requirement to enable NR’s to disclose certain information which is not mentioned in TRC. If TRC is inclusive of all the requisite information, no need to furnish Form 10F 67 Obligation of the Payer • Onerous requirement to determine taxability of the payment • Evaluate application of the provisions of the Act for taxability after characterization • Evaluate applicability of the tax treaty • Get confirmation whether payee has a PE in India • Be aware of latest judicial precedents • Observe deadlines for WHT and depositing the same 68 Consequences of TDS non-compliance Non-deduction or not depositing within prescribed time Section Consequences 40(a) Disallowance of expenses in computing taxable income of payer. Allowance in the year of deduction 201(1) Recovery of tax not deducted / deposited or short deducted / deposited 201(1A) 221 Interest @ 1% / 1.5% per month or for part of the month Penalty – not exceeding the amount of tax not paid 271C Penalty – not exceeding the amount of tax not withheld 276B Prosecution 69 General provisions Time limit for depositing TDS – Rule 30(2) and 30(2A) • Income / amount credited or paid during April to February ~ TDS to be deposited on or before 7 days from the end of the month in which deduction is made • Income / amount credited or paid in March ~ TDS to be deposited on or before 30 April • Any sum deducted under section 194-IA ~ TDS to be deposited within 30 days (w.e.f 1 June 2016, earlier 7 days) from the end of the month in which deduction is made • AO may permit quarterly deposit of TDS for payments made under sections 192, 194A, 194D, 194H Issue of TDS certificate – Section 200(3) read with Rule 31 • Deductor to issue TDS certificate to deductee in Form 16 (annually) in case of salary by 31 May of next FY and Form 16A (quarterly) in other cases within 15 days from the due date of furnishing TDS statement under Rule 31A • TDS deducted under section 194-IA - Deductor to issue TDS certificate to deductee in Form 16B within 15 days from the due date of furnishing challan-cum-statement in Form 26QB 70 General provisions Filing of quarterly statement of TDS - Section 200(3) read with Rule 31A TDS deducted under section 192 Form 24Q TDS deducted under sections 193 to 196D Form 27Q* All other deductees Form 26Q * in respect of deductee who is a non-resident not being a company or a foreign company or resident but not ordinarily resident – Section Due dates for furnishing statement (w.e.f 1 June 2016) Date of ending of quarter of FY Due Date 30 June 31 July of the FY 30 September 31 October of the FY 31 December 31 January of the FY 31 March 31 May of the FY immediately following the FY in which deduction made 71 General provisions Manner of furnishing TDS statements - Rule 31A(3) Mandatory to furnish TDS statements electronically under DSC or electronically alongwith verification of the statement in Form 27A if: deductor is government; deductor is a company; deductor liable for tax audit under section 44AB; number of deductee’s records in a statement for any quarter of the FY are 20 or more 72 Section 197 Certificate for deduction at lower rate 73 Section 197 Section 197 – Certificate for deduction at lower rate • If AO satisfied that total income of the recipient justifies deduction at lower rates or no deduction, at the time of payment, at the rates in force under the relevant sections, he shall issue a certificate on an application made by assessee • Payer to deduct TDS at the rates specified in the certificate until such certificate is cancelled • Application by a person for a certificate under section 197(1) shall be made in Form 13 ~ Rule 28 • Certificate under section 197 has no retrospective effect – Circular No 774 dated 17 March 1999 Certificate issued on 9 September 1997 cannot apply to amounts paid between 1 April 1997 and 9 September 1997 - Essar Oil Ltd v. ITO (262 CTR 63) Guj HC) 74 Section 197 Section 197A – No deduction to be made in certain cases • No deduction on certain incomes if the deductee files a declaration in the prescribed form (Form 15G) that tax on his estimated total income would be NIL • Resident individual who is of the age of 60 years or more to file declaration in Form 15H that tax on his estimated total income would be NIL to receive certain income without deduction of tax at source (197A(1C)) • Format and procedure for self-declaration of Form 15G / 15H - Rule 29C Payee to submit self-declaration either in paper form or electronically; Deductor will not deduct tax and will allot Unique Identification Number (UIN) to all self-declarations; Particulars of such self-declarations to be furnished by deductor alongwith UIN in quarterly TDS statements; Requirement of submitting physical copy of Form 15G / 15H by deductor to tax authorities dispensed with Deductor to retain Form 15G / 15H for 7 years 75 Case Studies 76 Case Study 1 – Reimbursement of Expenses ‘A Ltd’ incurred certain expenses amounting to Rs. 150,000 on behalf of ‘B Ltd’. A Ltd raised a debit note on B Ltd for reimbursement of expenses. In light of the above, advice B Ltd in following scenarios with respect to TDS? 1. A Ltd is in Mumbai and the reimbursement is towards repairs charges 2. A Ltd is in Hong Kong and the reimbursement is towards repair charges 3. A Ltd, Mumbai, has raised a lumpsum invoice towards IT support charges amounting to Rs. 350,000 which includes reimbursement of Rs. 150,000 towards software license fee: a. Where breakup of Rs. 350,000 is provided? b. Where breakup of Rs. 350,000 is not provided? 4. Would your answer differ if A Ltd is in USA? 5. What documentation do you advice your client in above cases? 77 Case Study 1 – Reimbursement of Expenses • Gross amount of bill including reimbursements - TDS to be made on the total bill amount including reimbursements - Circular 715 – Q. 30 • Consultant raising separate bills for reimbursements in addition to service bill – No TDS on reimbursements - ITO v. Dr.Willmar Schwabe India (P) Ltd. (95 TTJ 53) (Del ITAT) • Income element to be present – Section 4(2) and Section 190, Vijay Ship Breaking Corporation v. CIT (314 ITR 309) (SC), GE India Technology Centre P. Ltd v. CIT (327 ITR 456) (SC) p • Reimbursement does not partake the nature of income in the hands of the payee Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd v. DCIT [313 ITR (AT) 263] (Mum ITAT)(SB), Expeditors International (India) P. Ltd v. ACIT [2 ITR (Trib) 153 (Del ITAT) p • Reimbursement of travel expenses – Debatable issue since courts have taken both the views Saipem S.A. v. DDIT (54 SOT 111) (Mum ITAT), Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. DCIT (119 TTJ 716) (Chennai ITAT), P • Robust documentation – Back to back invoices, separate invoice for services and reimbursements, specifically for non-resident payments. 78 Case Study 2 – Telecom Towers X Ltd had the technology for constructing telecom towers During the year 2016, X Ltd approached various land owners to obtain their terrace space on lease and thereby acquired 3,000 terrace space on lease. X Ltd further constructed telecom towers on each of these terraces. X Ltd also purchased land to accommodate further 7,000 towers During the year 2016, X Ltd entered into a contract with Bharti Airtel Limited for leasing out the towers for consideration of Rs. 3,000 per month per tower along with land. The contract specifically provided for leasing out of both land as well as towers to Bharti Airtel Advice Airtel on withholding tax on payment to X Ltd. 79 Case Study 2 – Telecom Towers • Rent defined to include lease, sub-lease, tenancy, furniture, plant and machinery, etc. • Purpose test to be satisfied – Operative intention of the parties - Rajbir Kaur vs. S. Chokesiri & Co AIR 1988 SC 1845 p • Inseparability of transaction - Sultan Brothers (P.) Ltd. (51 ITR 353) (SC) • Passive infrastructure services to telecom operators – TDS under section 194-I @ 2% - Indus Towers Ltd. v. CIT (364 ITR 114) (Del HC) 80 Case Study 3 – Non Resident Payments S Ltd, India is engaged in the design of mobile hardware. H Ltd, Hong Kong, which fully holds S Ltd, sends Mr. John for 15 days to S Ltd for training the employees on a new technology in relation to mobile hardware. H Ltd raises an invoice of $.200,000 on S Ltd for the training services Advice A Ltd. a. What aspects would you analyse from the aspect of withholding tax? b. What documents would A Ltd have to obtain from S Ltd? c. What would be the advice? 81 Case Study 3 – Non Resident Payments • Payment of “any sum” – Covers payment of FTS • Payments “chargeable to tax” in India - Payment to H Ltd is taxable in India as FTS [Section 9(1)(vii)] • India China Treaty not to apply – Instruction No. 1947 dated. April 23, 1998 • Conversion to INR - Rule 26 (SBI TTBR as on the date on which tax is required to be deducted) • TDS @ 10.506% (10% + 2% + 3%) • Compliances: − Obtaining “No PE” declaration from H Ltd? − Tax Residency Certificate? − Form 15CA & CB − E-TDS returns − Form 16A 82 Case Study 4 – Year end Provisions P Ltd entered into a contract with Q Ltd for use of trademark on which royalty was payable @ 1% of total sales to Q Ltd. For the year ended 31 March 2016, P Ltd accrued for royalty payable in its books. However no tax was deducted at source on 31 March 2016. It may be noted that Q Ltd has neither raised debit note nor has raised any invoice for royalty receivable as on 31 March 2016 Advice P Ltd from withholding tax perspective under the following circumstances: 1. The provision is credited to ‘Royalty Payable’ Account on 31 March 2016 and a. Remains in the said account as on date of filing the ROI b. Is subsequently reversed on 1 April 2016 c. Is subsequently transferred to Q Ltd Account on 31 May 2016 2. The provision is credited to ‘Q Ltd’ on 31 March 2016 and no reversal has been made nor the same has been paid as on the date of filing the return of income 3. What if Q Ltd has raised a debit note on 30 April 30 2016? 83 Case Study 4 – Year end Provisions • Conflicting positions adopted by different courts - Depends on facts of each case • Facts to be ascertained: − Whether Payee’s are identifiable? − Whether the entries are reversed subsequently? • DIT v. Ericsson Communications Ltd (378 ITR 395) (Del HC) – Mere passing of book entries which are reversed, would not give rise to an obligation to deduct TDS by the assessee, as clearly, there is no debt that can be said to be acknowledged by the assessee (Favorable)p • Pfizer Ltd v. ITO (TDS) (55 SOT 277) (Mum ITAT) – Payee’s are not identifiable and TDS not applicable. However since payer has himself disallowed the expense, no further disallowance is warranted (Favorable) • IBM India (P) Ltd v. ITO (TDS) (154 ITD 497) (Bang ITAT) – Liability to deduct tax exists when amount is credited to suspense account. Argument of unidentified payee is not tenable since company is required to maintain accounts on mercantile basis (Against)p 84 Questions???? 85 Thank You !! 86
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz