here - Pearson Higher Education

Forecasting
Chapter 9
Chapter Objectives
Be able to:
Discuss the importance of forecasting and identify the
most appropriate type of forecasting approach, given
different forecasting situations.
Apply a variety of time series forecasting models,
including moving average, exponential smoothing, and
linear regression models.
Develop causal forecasting models using linear
regression and multiple regression.
Calculate measures of forecasting accuracy and
interpret the results.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-2
Forecasting
 Forecast – An estimate of the future level of
some variable.
 Why Forecast?
 Assess long-term capacity needs
 Develop budgets, hiring plans, etc.
 Plan production or order materials
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-3
Types of Forecasts
 Demand
 Firm-level
 Market-level
 Supply
 Number of current producers and suppliers
 Projected aggregate supply levels
 Technological and political trends
 Price
 Cost of supplies and services
 Market price for firm’s product or service
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-4
Laws of Forecasting
 Forecasts are almost always wrong by some amount
(but they are still useful).
 Forecasts for the near term tend to be more
accurate.
 Forecasts for groups of products or services tend to
be more accurate.
 Forecasts are no substitute for calculated values.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-5
Forecasting Methods
 Qualitative forecasting techniques – Forecasting
techniques based on intuition or informed opinion.
 Used when data are scarce, not available, or
irrelevant.
 Quantitative forecasting models – Forecasting
models that use measurable, historical data to
generate forecasts.
 Time series and causal models
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-6
Selecting a Forecasting Method
Figure 9.2
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-7
Qualitative Forecasting Methods
 Market surveys
 Build-up forecasts
 Life-cycle analogy method
 Panel consensus forecasting
 Delphi method
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-8
Quantitative Forecasting Methods
 Time series forecasting models – Models that
use a series of observations in chronological
order to develop forecasts.
 Causal forecasting models – Models in which
forecasts are modeled as a function of
something other than time.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-9
Demand movement
 Randomness – Unpredictable movement from one
time period to the next.
 Trend – Long-term movement up or down in a time
series.
 Seasonality – A repeated pattern of spikes or drops
in a time series associated with certain times of the
year.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 10
Time series with randomness
Figure 9.3
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 11
Time series with
Trend and Seasonality
Figure 9.4
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 12
Last Period Model
 Last Period Model - The simplest time series
model that uses demand for the current
period as a forecast for the next period.
Ft+1 = Dt
where Ft+1= forecast for the next period, t+1
and Dt = demand for the current period, t
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 13
Last Period Model
Table 9.3
Figure 9.5
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 14
Moving Average Model
 Moving Average Model – A time series
forecasting model that derives a forecast by
taking an average of recent demand value.
n
Ft 1 
D
i 1
t 1i
n
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 15
Moving Average Model
Period
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Demand
12
15
11
9
10
8
14
12
n
Ft 1 
 Dt 1i
i 1
n
3-period moving average
forecast for Period 8:
=
=
(14 + 8 + 10) / 3
10.67
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 16
Weighted Moving Average Model
 Weighted Moving Average Model – A form of
the moving average model that allows the
actual weights applied to past observations
to differ.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 17
Weighted Moving Average Model
Period
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Demand
12
15
11
9
10
8
14
12
3-period weighted moving
average forecast for Period 8=
[(0.5  14) + (0.3  8) + (0.2  10)] / 1 =
11.4
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 18
Exponential Smoothing Model
 Exponential Smoothing Model – A form of the
moving average model in which the forecast for the
next period is calculated as the weighted average of
the current period’s actual value and forecast.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 19
Exponential Smoothing Model
a = .3
Period Demand
1
50
Forecast
40
2
46
.3 * 50 + (1-.3) * 40 = 43
3
52
.3 * 46 + (1-.3) * 43 = 43.9
4
48
.3 * 52 + (1-.3) * 43.9 = 46.33
5
47
.3 * 48 + (1-.3) * 46.33 = 46.83
6
.3 * 47 + (1-.3) * 46.83 = 46.88
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 20
Adjusted Exponential Smoothing
 Adjusted Exponential Smoothing Model – An expanded
version of the exponential smoothing model that includes a
trend adjustment factor.
AFt+1 = Ft+1 +Tt+1
where AFt+1 = adjusted forecast for the next period
Ft+1 = unadjusted forecast for the next period = aDt + (1 – a) Ft
Tt+1 = trend factor for the next period = (Ft+1 – Ft) + (1 – )Tt
Tt = trend factor for the current period
 smoothing constant for the trend adjustment factor
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 21
Linear Regression

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 22
Linear Regression
 How to calculate the a and b
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 23
Linear Regression – Example 9.3
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 24
Linear Regression – Example 9.3
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 25
Linear Regression – Example 9.3
Figure 9.12
The graph shows an upward trend of 7.33 sales per month.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 26
Seasonal Adjustments
 Seasonality – Repeated patterns or drops in a
time series associated with certain times of
the year.
Table 9.8
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 27
Seasonal Adjustments
 Four-step procedure:
 For each of the demand values in the time series, calculate the
corresponding forecast using the unadjusted forecast model.
 For each demand value, calculate (Demand/Forecast). If the ratio is
less than 1, then the forecast model overforecasted; if it is greater
than 1, then the model underforecasted.
 If the time series covers multiple years, take the average
(Demand/Forecast) for corresponding months or quarters to derive
the seasonal index. Otherwise use (Demand/Forecast) calculated in
Step 2 as the seasonal index.
 Multiply the unadjusted forecast by the seasonal index to get the
seasonally adjusted forecast value.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 28
Seasonality – Example 9.4
Note that the
regression forecast does
not reflect the
seasonality.
Figure 9.15
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 29
Seasonality – Example 9.4
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 30
Seasonality – Example 9.4
Calculate the (Demand/Forecast) for each of the time periods:
January 2012: (Demand/Forecast) = 51/106.9 = .477
January 2013: (Demand/Forecast) = 112/205.6 = .545
Calculate the monthly seasonal indices:
Monthly seasonal index, January = (.477 + .545)/2 = .511
Calculate the seasonally adjusted forecasts
Seasonally adjusted forecast = unadjusted forecast x seasonal index
January 2012: 106.9 x .511 = 54.63
January 2013: 205.6 x .511 = 105.06
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 31
Seasonality – Example 9.4
Note that the
regression forecast now
does reflect the
seasonality.
Figure 9.16
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 32
Causal Forecasting Models
 Linear Regression
 Multiple Regression
 Examples:
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 33
Multiple Regression
 Multiple Regression – A generalized form of linear regression
that allows for more than one independent variable.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 34
Forecast Accuracy
How do we know:
 If a forecast model is “best”?
 If a forecast model is still working?
 What types of errors a particular forecasting model
is prone to make?
Need measures of forecast accuracy
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 35
Measures of Forecast Accuracy
 Forecast error for period (i) =
 Mean forecast error (MFE) =
 Mean absolute deviation (MAD) =
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 36
Measures of Forecast Accuracy
 Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) =
 Tracking Signal =
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 37
Forecast Accuracy – Example 9.7
Table 9.11
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 38
Forecast Accuracy – Example 9.7
 Calculate the forecast error for each week,
the absolute deviation of the forecast error,
and absolute percent errors.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 39
Forecast Accuracy – Example 9.7
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 40
Forecast Accuracy – Example 9.7
 Model 2 has the lowest MFE so it is the least
biased.
 Model 2 also has the lowest MAD and MAPE
values so it appears to be superior.
 Calculate the tracking signal for the first 10
weeks.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 41
Forecast Accuracy – Example 9.7
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 42
Forecast Accuracy – Example 9.7
 The tracking signal for Model 2 gets very low
in week 5, however the model recovers.
 You need to continue to update the tracking
signal in the future.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 43
Collaborative Planning,
Forecasting, and Replenishment (CPFR)
 CPFR – A set of business processes, backed
up by information technology, in which
members agree to mutual business
objectives and measures, develop joint sales
and operational plans, and collaborate
electronically to generate and update sales
forecasts and replenishment plans.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 44
Forecasting
Case Study
Top-Slice Drivers
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 45
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or
otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9 - 46