RTI Toolkit: A Practical Guide for Schools
RTI Decision Rules: Resources
Jim Wright, Presenter
14 March 2011
Technical Assistance Meeting for Committee on Special
Education Chairpersons
Crowne Plaza Resort
Lake Placid, NY
Contents :
Creating a Building Academic Screening Plan…………….………….. 02
Evaluating RTI Monitoring Tools: A Checklist…………..……….….… 12
Academic Interventions Critical Components Checklist……..…….... 13
Classroom Intervention Documentation Form……………………..…. 17
Building Your Schools Capacity for Tier 1 Interventions……..….... 20
Intervention Script Builder………….………………..…………..….... 27
Intervention Contact Log………….……………………….……..….... 29
Intervention Integrity Organizer Form………….………….……..….... 30
Setting Up & Interpreting Time-Series Charts………….……….….... 31
Jim Wright
364 Long Road
Tully, NY 13159
Email: [email protected]
Workshop handouts available at: http://www.jimwrightonline.com/CCSE.php
2
Finding Students At-Risk for Learning Problems: Creating a School-Wide
Academic Screening Plan
Schools can screen all students with brief academic measures to identify those students who are experiencing skill deficits in content areas.
Providing intervention when a student is just beginning to display academic delays is more likely to be effective and is typically less costly than
attempting to intervene when a student’s problems have spiraled into full-blown crisis. The purpose of school-wide screening, therefore, is to allow
buildings to proactively flag struggling students at an early point and match them to appropriate interventions.
Schools should remember that whole-group screening results are often not sufficient to map out completely what a specific student’s skill deficits
might be—nor are they designed to do so. Rather, screenings help schools to single out quickly and with the minimum required investment of
resources those students who need more intervention assistance. Some students picked up in a screening will require additional, detailed follow-up
“instructional assessment” (Hosp, 2008) in order to better understand their learning needs and select appropriate interventions.
There are three general steps to implementing a school-wide screening program (Stewart & Silberglit, 2008).
1. First, the school must decide on the range of measures or sources of data that will be used to screen their student population.
2. Next, the school must line up the required resources to conduct the screening. This step includes scheduling time for screening measures to be
administered and finding personnel to administer, score, and interprets the results of those measures.
3. Finally, the school must build a process for communicating the screening results to classroom teachers and other interventionists and for using
the screening data to identify students who need supplemental (Tier 2 or 3) interventions.
A series of brief, timed academic assessments known as Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) have been developed that can assess student
performance in basic academic skills. CBM assessments share a number of qualities that make them very useful as RTI academic screening tools
(Hosp, Hosp, & Howell, 2007). CBM measures are efficient to administer, align with the curriculum; have ‘technical adequacy’ as measurements; use
standard procedures to prepare materials, administer, and score; and provide objective, observable, ‘low inference’ information about student
performance. CBM measures are also criterion-referenced, allowing schools to set specific decision rules to interpret student data and make
appropriate instructional decisions.
Other Resources
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
2
3
The National Center on Response to Intervention rates the ‘technical adequacy’ of commercially available academic screening and progressmonitoring tools. Review their findings at:

http://www.rti4success.org/chart/progressMonitoring/progressmonitoringtoolschart.htm
Harn (2000) offers general advice on how to conduct a schoolwide screening in literacy skills at the elementary level. Those guidelines can be found
at:

https://dibels.uoregon.edu/logistics/data_collection.pdf
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
3
4
Directions: Select those CBM measures below to be used in your school-wide screening. Select also the grades and screening points during the
school year when each selected measure will be administered. (‘F’= Fall, ‘W’ = Winter, ‘S’ = Spring).
RTI General Outcome Measures/Skill-Based Measures: Literacy Skills
Initial Sound Fluency
(Phonemic Awareness)
GRADE
F
K
WS
F
1
WS
F
2
WS
F
3
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
: 3 minutes Administration: 1:1:
Description: The student is shown a collection of 4 pictures, each depicting an object that begins with a different letter sound. The examiner gives the student a
letter sound and asks the student to select from the collection the picture of the object that begins with that letter sound. The process is repeated with new sets of
pictures for the duration of the monitoring period.
Online Sources for This Measure
 DIBELS (https://dibels.org/next/index.php) [Free]. Administration Range:
Pre-K through middle of Kindergarten.
Phoneme Segmentation (Phonemic
Awareness)
GRADE
F
K
WS
F
1
WS
F
2
WS
F
3
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
: 1 minute Administration: 1:1
Description: The student is read a list of words containing 2 or more phonemes. For each word, the student is asked to recite all of the phonemes that make up the
word.
Online Sources for This Measure
 DIBELS (https://dibels.org/next/index.php) [Free]. Administration Range:
Middle of Kindergarten through end of Grade 1.
 Easy CBM (http://www.easycbm.com/). [Free]. Administration Range:
Kindergarten and Grade 1.
Jim Wright, Presenter

AimsWeb (http://www.aimsweb.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Middle of Kindergarten through middle of Grade 1.
www.interventioncentral.org
4
5
Letter Naming Fluency (Alphabetics)
: 1 minute Administration: 1:1
GRADE
F
K
WS
F
1
WS
F
2
WS
F
3
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
Description: The student is presented with a list of randomly arranged letters. The student names as many letters as possible.
Online Sources for This Measure
 DIBELS (https://dibels.org/next/index.php) [Free]. Administration Range:
Beginning of Kindergarten through beginning of Grade 1.
 Intervention Central (http://www.rti2.org/rti2/letterNamings).[Free]. Site
provides an online application (‘Letter Naming Fluency Probe Generator’)
that creates randomly generated sets of uppercase, lowercase, and
mixed-case letters in English and Spanish for Letter Naming Fluency
assessments.
Letter Sound Fluency (Alphabetics)
: 1 minute Administration: 1:1
GRADE


F
Easy CBM (http://www.easycbm.com/).[Free]. Administration Range:
Kindergarten and Grade 1.
AimsWeb (http://www.aimsweb.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Beginning of Kindergarten through beginning of Grade 1.
K
WS
F
1
WS
F
2
WS
F
3
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
Description: The student is presented with a list of randomly arranged letters. The student gives the sounds of as many letters as possible.
Online Sources for This Measure
 Easy CBM (http://www.easycbm.com/).[Free]. Administration Range:
Kindergarten and Grade 1.
 AimsWeb (http://www.aimsweb.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Middle of Kindergarten through beginning of Grade 1.


EdCheckup (http://www.edcheckup.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Information unavailable.
Intervention Central (http://www.rti2.org/rti2/letterNamings).[Free]. Site
provides an online application (‘Letter Naming Fluency Probe Generator’)
that creates randomly generated sets of uppercase, lowercase, and
mixed-case letters in English and Spanish that could be used for Letter
Sound Fluency assessments.
Nonsense Word Fluency
(Alphabetics)
GRADE
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
F
K
WS
F
1
WS
F
2
WS
F
3
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
: 1 minute Administration: 1:1
5
6
Description: The student is shown a list of short nonsense words. For each word, the student is to read the word or give the sounds that make up the word.
Online Sources for This Measure
 DIBELS (https://dibels.org/next/index.php) [Free]. Administration Range:
Middle of Kindergarten through middle of Grade 2.
Word Identification Fluency
(Alphabetics)
GRADE

F
AimsWeb (http://www.aimsweb.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Middle of Kindergarten through end of Grade 1.
K
WS
F
1
WS
F
2
WS
F
3
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
: 1 minute Administration: 1:1
Description: The student is presented with a list of words randomly selected from a larger word list (e.g., Dolch Wordlist). The student reads as many words as
possible.
Online Sources for This Measure
 Easy CBM (http://www.easycbm.com/).[Free]. Administration Range:
Kindergarten through Grade 3.
 Intervention Central (http://www.interventioncentral.org).[Free].
Site provides an online application (‘CBM List Builder’) that creates
randomly generated Word Identification Probes based on the Dolch
Wordlist.
Oral Reading Fluency (Fluency With
Text)
: 1 minute Administration: 1:1
GRADE
F
6
WS

EdCheckup (http://www.edcheckup.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Information unavailable.
F
K
WS
F
7
WS
F
1
WS
F
8
WS
F
2
WS
F
9
WS
F
3
WS
F
10
WS
F
4
WS
F
11
WS
F
5
WS
F
12
WS
Description: The student reads aloud from a passage and is scored for fluency and accuracy. Passages are controlled for level of reading difficulty.
Online Sources for This Measure
 DIBELS (https://dibels.org/next/index.php) [Free]. Administration Range:
Middle of Grade 1 through Grade 6. Site has both English and Spanish
reading probes.
 Easy CBM (http://www.easycbm.com/).[Free]. Administration Range:
Jim Wright, Presenter


AimsWeb (http://www.aimsweb.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Grade 1 through Grade 8. Site has both English and Spanish reading
probes.
iSteep (http://www.isteep.com/).[Pay] Administration Range: Grade K
www.interventioncentral.org
6
7

Grade 1 through Grade 8.
Intervention Central (http://www.rti2.org/rti2/oralReadings).[Free].
Application that creates an oral reading fluency probe based on text
supplied by the user.
CBM Maze (Reading
Comprehension)
: 1-3 minutes Administration:
Group

through Grade 6 (progress-monitoring). Site has both English and
Spanish reading probes.
EdCheckup (http://www.edcheckup.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Information unavailable.
GRADE
F
K
WS
6
WS
F
7
WS
F
F
1
WS
F
8
WS
F
2
WS
F
9
WS
F
3
WS
F
10
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
F
11
WS
F
12
WS
Description: The student is given a passage in which every 7th word has been removed. The student reads the passage silently. Each time the student comes to a
removed word, the student chooses from among 3 replacement words: the correct word and two distractors. The student circles the replacement word that he or
she believes best restores the meaning of the text.
Online Sources for This Measure
 AimsWeb (http://www.aimsweb.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Grade 1 through Grade 8.
 EdCheckup (http://www.edcheckup.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Information unavailable.



iSteep (http://www.isteep.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range Grade 1
through Grade 6.
Intervention Central (http://www.rti2.org/rti2/mazes).[Free]. Application
that creates a maze passage probe based on text typed in by the user.
Yearly ProgressPro (http://www.ctb.com/yearlyprogresspro). [Pay].
Computer-delivered Maze passages.
RTI General Outcome Measures/Skill-Based Measures: Writing Skills
CBM Written
Expression
: 4 minutes Administration:
Group
GRADE
F
K
WS
6
WS
F
7
WS
F
F
1
WS
F
8
WS
F
2
WS
F
9
WS
F
3
WS
F
10
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
F
11
WS
F
12
WS
Description: The student is given a story starter as a writing prompt. The student spends one minute thinking about the story starter topic, then has 3 minutes to
write the story. The CBM writing probe offers three scoring options: Total Number of Words Written, Correctly Spelled Words, and Correct Writing Sequences (a
scoring approach that takes into account the mechanics and conventions of writing such as punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and correct semantic and
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
7
8
syntactic usage).
Online Sources for This Measure
 AimsWeb (http://www.aimsweb.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Grade 1 through Grade 8
 EdCheckup (http://www.edcheckup.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Information unavailable.

Intervention Central (http://www.rti2.org/rti2/writtenExpressions).[Free].
Application that creates a writing probe using pre-entered story starters or
text typed in by the user.
RTI General Outcome Measures/Skill-Based Measures: Mathematics Skills
Quantity Discrimination (Early Math
Fluency)
GRADE
F
K
WS
F
1
WS
F
2
WS
F
3
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
: 1 minute Administration: 1:1:
Description: The student is given a sheet with number pairs. For each number pair, the student must name the larger of the two numbers.
Online Sources for This Measure
 AimsWeb (http://www.aimsweb.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Grade K through Grade 1.
Missing Number (Early Math
Fluency)
GRADE

F
Intervention Central
(http://www.lefthandlogic.com/php/numberfly/numberfly.php). [Free].
Application that dynamically creates quantity discrimination probes based
on user-entered preferences.
K
WS
F
1
WS
F
2
WS
F
3
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
: 1 minute Administration: 1:1:
Description: The student is given a sheet containing numerous sets of 3 or 4 sequential numbers. For each number series, one of the numbers is missing. The
student must name the missing number.
Online Sources for This Measure
 AimsWeb (http://www.aimsweb.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Grade K through Grade 1.
Jim Wright, Presenter

Intervention Central
(http://www.lefthandlogic.com/php/numberfly/numberfly.php). [Free].
Application that dynamically creates quantity discrimination probes based
www.interventioncentral.org
8
9
on user-entered preferences.
Number Identification (Early Math
Fluency)
GRADE
F
K
WS
F
1
WS
F
2
WS
F
3
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
: 1 minute Administration: 1:1:
Description: The student is given a sheet with numbers in random order. The student gives the name of each number.
Online Sources for This Measure
 AimsWeb (http://www.aimsweb.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Grade K through Grade 1.
Oral Counting (Early
Math Fluency)
GRADE

F
Intervention Central
(http://www.lefthandlogic.com/php/numberfly/numberfly.php). [Free].
Application that dynamically creates quantity discrimination probes based
on user-entered preferences.
K
WS
F
1
WS
F
2
WS
F
3
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
: 1 minute Administration: 1:1:
Description: The student counts aloud as many words in sequence as possible, starting from zero or one. NOTE: The student does not require materials for this
assessment. The examiner can make a sheet with numbers listed sequentially from 0-100 to record those numbers that the student can recite in sequence.
Online Sources for This Measure
 AimsWeb (http://www.aimsweb.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range:
Grade K through Grade 1.
CBM Math Computation
: 2 minutes Administration: Group
GRADE
F
K
WS
6
WS
F
7
WS
F
F
1
WS
F
8
WS
F
2
WS
F
9
WS
F
3
WS
F
10
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
F
11
WS
F
12
WS
Description: The student is given a worksheet with math computation problems. The worksheet may be a single-skill probe (all problems of a single type) or a
mixed-skill probe ( several different problem types). The completed worksheet is scored for the number of Correct Digits (digits in student answers that are of the
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
9
10
correct value and appear in the correct place-value location).
Online Sources for This Measure
 AimsWeb (http://www.aimsweb.com/). [Pay].
 EdCheckup (http://www.edcheckup.com/). [Pay].
CBM Math Concepts
& Applications
: 8-10 minutes Administration:
Group


iSteep (http://www.isteep.com/). [Pay]: Administration Range Grade K
through Grade 6.
Intervention Central
(http://www.interventioncentral.org/htmdocs/tools/mathprobe/allmult.php) .
[Free]. Application that single- and mixed skill math computation probes
based on user-selected criteria.
GRADE
F
K
WS
6
WS
F
7
WS
F
F
1
WS
F
8
WS
F
2
WS
F
9
WS
F
3
WS
F
10
WS
F
4
WS
F
5
WS
F
11
WS
F
12
WS
Description: The student is given a worksheet (or completes an online assessment) that contains a mix of applied math problems that are tied to larger concepts
(e.g., to the Math Focal Points from the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Online Sources for This Measure
 AimsWeb (http://www.aimsweb.com/). [Pay].
 Easy CBM (http://www.easycbm.com/).[Free for individual teachers;
subscription pricing available to school districts]. Administration Range
Grade K through Grade 8. Student probes can be completed online.


iSteep (http://www.isteep.com/). [Pay]. Administration Range Grade 1
through Grade 8.
Yearly ProgressPro (http://www.ctb.com/yearlyprogresspro).
[Pay].Administration Range Grade 1 through Grade 8.Computer-delivered
assessments.
References
Harn, B. (2000). Approaches and considerations of collecting schoolwide early literacy and reading performance data. Retrieved on July 26, 2010,
from https://dibels.uoregon.edu/logistics/data_collection.pdf
Hosp, J. L. (2008). Best practices in aligning academic assessment with instruction. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school
psychology V (pp.363-376). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
10
11
Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM. New York: Guilford Press.
Stewart, L. H. & Silberglit, B. (2008). Best practices in developing academic local norms. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school
psychology V (pp. 225-242). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
11
12
Evaluating RTI Tools for Monitoring Academic Progress: A Checklist
Directions: Use the checklist below to rate the ‘RTI readiness’ of your school’s academic progress-monitoring tools.
NOTE: The checklist is based on guidelines adapted from the National Center on RTI (n.d.).
Yes or No?
___ Y ___ N
___ Y ___ N
___ Y ___ N
___ Y ___ N
___ Y ___ N
___ Y ___ N
___ Y ___ N
___ Y ___ N
Relevant Questions About the Proposed Academic Measure
1. Does the measure provide a reliable score? Research
evidence demonstrates that the measure is reliable (e.g.,
similar results are obtained when different people give the
measure or when alternate forms of the measure are given
by the same person.).
2. Does the measure yield a reliable trend of student
progress (reliability of slope)? The measure has been
shown to accurately identify and differentiate the trend or rate
of improvement of different students over time.
3. Is the measure a valid indicator of the academic skill of
interest? The measure provides meaningful information
about the academic ‘construct’ being assessed (i.e., the
cognitive skills or processes needed to complete the
academic skill(s) of interest).
4. Does the measure predict success on important highstakes student achievement measures or milestones?
Students’ performance on the measure has the power to
‘predict’ whether those same students are likely to be
successful on other key academically relevant objectives,
such as state tests or course completion.
5. Are there sufficient ‘alternate forms’ of the measure to
allow for adequate student progress-monitoring? The
measure has at least 9 alternate versions of equivalent
difficulty to permit the school to repeatedly assess student
progress over time.
6. Is the measure sensitive to improvements in student
skills? The measure is sufficiently sensitive to show within a
reasonable length of time (e.g., 6 to 8 instructional weeks)
whether the student has made meaningful growth in
academic skills.
7. Does the measure provide benchmarks to evaluate
student performance? The measure supplies benchmarks
by grade level to indicate whether a student has reached an
expected level of proficiency in the skill being measured by
the end of the academic year.
8. Does the measure provide information about expected
rates of student improvement? The measure gives
direction to the school for calculating the typical or expected
rate of weekly progress to use in setting student intervention
goals.
NOTES
National Center on Response to Intervention Technical Review Committee on Screening. (n.d.) Progress monitoring
tools chart. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/chart/progressMonitoring/progressmonitoringtoolschart.htm
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
12
13
‘How RTI Works’ Series © 2010 Jim Wright
www.interventioncentral.org 1
Academic Interventions ‘Critical Components’ Checklist
This checklist summarizes the essential components of academic interventions. When preparing a student’s Tier 1, 2,
or 3 academic intervention plan, use this document as a ‘pre-flight checklist’ to ensure that the academic intervention is
of high quality, is sufficiently strong to address the identified student problem, is fully understood and supported by the
teacher, and can be implemented with integrity. NOTE: While the checklist refers to the ‘teacher’ as the interventionist,
it can also be used as a guide to ensure the quality of interventions implemented by non-instructional personnel, adult
volunteers, parents, and peer (student) tutors.
Directions: When creating an academic intervention plan, review that plan by comparing it to each of the items below.
 If a particular intervention element is missing or needs to be reviewed, check the ‘Critical Item?’ column for that
element.
 Write any important notes or questions in the ‘Notes’ column.
Allocating Sufficient Contact Time & Assuring Appropriate Student-Teacher Ratio
The cumulative time set aside for an intervention and the amount of direct teacher contact are two factors that help to
determine that intervention’s ‘strength’ (Yeaton & Sechrest, 1981).
Critical
Intervention Element
Notes
Item?

Time Allocated. The time set aside for the intervention is appropriate
for the type and level of student problem (Burns & Gibbons, 2008;
Kratochwill, Clements & Kalymon, 2007). When evaluating whether the
amount of time allocated is adequate, consider:
 Length of each intervention session.
 Frequency of sessions (e.g.., daily, 3 times per week)
 Duration of intervention period (e.g., 6 instructional weeks)

Student-Teacher Ratio. The student receives sufficient contact from
the teacher or other person delivering the intervention to make that
intervention effective. NOTE: Generally, supplemental intervention
groups should be limited to 6-7 students (Burns & Gibbons, 2008).
Matching the Intervention to the Student Problem
Academic interventions are not selected at random. First, the student academic problem(s) is defined clearly and in
detail. Then, the likely explanations for the academic problem(s) are identified to understand which intervention(s) are
likely to help—and which should be avoided.
Critical
Intervention Element
Notes
Item?

Problem Definition. The student academic problem(s) to be addressed
in the intervention are defined in clear, specific, measureable terms
(Bergan, 1995; Witt, VanDerHeyden & Gilbertson, 2004). The full
problem definition describes:
 Conditions. Describe the environmental conditions or task
demands in place when the academic problem is observed.
 Problem Description. Describe the actual observable academic
behavior in which the student is engaged. Include rate, accuracy,
or other quantitative information of student performance.
 Typical or Expected Level of Performance. Provide a typical or
expected performance criterion for this skill or behavior. Typical or
expected academic performance can be calculated using a variety
of sources,

Appropriate Target. Selected intervention(s) are appropriate for the
identified student problem(s) (Burns, VanDerHeyden & Boice, 2008).
TIP: Use the Instructional Hierarchy (Haring et al., 1978) to select
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
13
14
‘How RTI Works’ Series © 2010 Jim Wright

www.interventioncentral.org 2
academic interventions according to the four stages of learning:
 Acquisition. The student has begun to learn how to complete the
target skill correctly but is not yet accurate in the skill. Interventions
should improve accuracy.
 Fluency. The student is able to complete the target skill accurately
but works slowly. Interventions should increase the student’s speed
of responding (fluency) as well as to maintain accuracy.
 Generalization. The student may have acquired the target skill but
does not typically use it in the full range of appropriate situations or
settings. Or the student may confuse the target skill with ‘similar’
skills. Interventions should get the student to use the skill in the
widest possible range of settings and situations, or to accurately
discriminate between the target skill and ‘similar’ skills.
 Adaptation. The student is not yet able to modify or adapt an
existing skill to fit novel task-demands or situations. Interventions
should help the student to identify key concepts or elements from
previously learned skills that can be adapted to the new demands
or situations.
‘Can’t Do/Won’t Do’ Check. The teacher has determined whether the
student problem is primarily a skill or knowledge deficit (‘can’t do’) or
whether student motivation plays a main or supporting role in academic
underperformance (‘wont do’). If motivation appears to be a significant
factor contributing to the problem, the intervention plan includes
strategies to engage the student (e.g., high interest learning activities;
rewards/incentives; increased student choice in academic assignments,
etc.) (Skinner, Pappas & Davis, 2005; Witt, VanDerHeyden &
Gilbertson, 2004).
Incorporating Effective Instructional Elements
These effective ‘building blocks’ of instruction are well-known and well-supported by the research. They should be
considered when selecting or creating any academic intervention.
Critical
Intervention Element
Notes
Item?

Explicit Instruction. Student skills have been broken down “into
manageable and deliberately sequenced steps” and the teacher
provided“ overt strategies for students to learn and practice new skills”
(Burns, VanDerHeyden & Boice, 2008, p.1153).

Appropriate Level of Challenge. The student experienced sufficient
success in the academic task(s) to shape learning in the desired
direction as well as to maintain student motivation (Burns,
VanDerHeyden & Boice, 2008).

Active Engagement. The intervention ensures that the student is
engaged in ‘active accurate responding’ (Skinner, Pappas & Davis,
2005).at a rate frequent enough to capture student attention and to
optimize effective learning.

Performance Feedback. The student receives prompt performance
feedback about the work completed (Burns, VanDerHeyden & Boice,
2008).

Maintenance of Academic Standards. If the intervention includes any
accommodations to better support the struggling learner (e.g.,
preferential seating, breaking a longer assignment into smaller chunks),
those accommodations do not substantially lower the academic
standards against which the student is to be evaluated and are not likely
to reduce the student’s rate of learning (Skinner, Pappas & Davis,
2005).
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
14
15
‘How RTI Works’ Series © 2010 Jim Wright
www.interventioncentral.org 3
Verifying Teacher Understanding & Providing Teacher Support
The teacher is an active agent in the intervention, with primary responsibility for putting it into practice in a busy
classroom. It is important, then, that the teacher fully understands how to do the intervention, believes that he or she
can do it, and knows whom to seek out if there are problems with the intervention.
Critical
Intervention Element
Notes
Item?

Teacher Responsibility. The teacher understands his or her
responsibility to implement the academic intervention(s) with integrity.

Teacher Acceptability. The teacher states that he or she finds the
academic intervention feasible and acceptable for the identified student
problem.

Step-by-Step Intervention Script. The essential steps of the
intervention are written as an ‘intervention script’--a series of clearly
described steps—to ensure teacher understanding and make
implementation easier (Hawkins, Morrison, Musti-Rao & Hawkins,
2008).
Intervention Training. If the teacher requires training to carry out the
intervention, that training has been arranged.



Intervention Elements: Negotiable vs. Non-Negotiable. The teacher
knows all of the steps of the intervention. Additionally, the teacher
knows which of the intervention steps are ‘non-negotiable’ (they must be
completed exactly as designed) and which are ‘negotiable’ (the teacher
has some latitude in how to carry out those steps) (Hawkins, Morrison,
Musti-Rao & Hawkins, 2008).
Assistance With the Intervention. If the intervention cannot be
implemented as designed for any reason (e.g., student absence, lack of
materials, etc.), the teacher knows how to get assistance quickly to
either fix the problem(s) to the current intervention or to change the
intervention.
Documenting the Intervention & Collecting Data
Interventions only have meaning if they are done within a larger data-based context. For example, interventions that
lack baseline data, goal(s) for improvement, and a progress-monitoring plan are ‘fatally flawed’ (Witt, VanDerHeyden &
Gilbertson, 2004).
Critical
Intervention Element
Notes
Item?

Intervention Documentation. The teacher understands and can
manage all documentation required for this intervention (e.g.,
maintaining a log of intervention sessions, etc.).

Checkup Date. Before the intervention begins, a future checkup date is
selected to review the intervention to determine if it is successful. Time
elapsing between the start of the intervention and the checkup date
should be short enough to allow a timely review of the intervention but
long enough to give the school sufficient time to judge with confidence
whether the intervention worked.

Baseline. Before the intervention begins, the teacher has collected
information about the student’s baseline level of performance in the
identified area(s) of academic concern (Witt, VanDerHeyden &
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
15
16
‘How RTI Works’ Series © 2010 Jim Wright
www.interventioncentral.org 4
Gilbertson, 2004).


Goal. Before the intervention begins, the teacher has set a specific goal
for predicted student improvement to use as a minimum standard for
success (Witt, VanDerHeyden & Gilbertson, 2004). The goal is the
expected student outcome by the checkup date if the intervention is
successful.
Progress-Monitoring. During the intervention, the teacher collects
progress-monitoring data of sufficient quality and at a sufficient
frequency to determine at the checkup date whether that intervention is
successful (Witt, VanDerHeyden & Gilbertson, 2004).
References
Bergan, J. R. (1995). Evolution of a problem-solving model of consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological
Consultation, 6(2), 111-123.
Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. A. (2008). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools.
Routledge: New York.
Burns, M. K., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Boice, C. H. (2008). Best practices in intensive academic interventions. In A.
Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp.1151-1162). Bethesda, MD: National
Association of School Psychologists.
Haring, N.G., Lovitt, T.C., Eaton, M.D., & Hansen, C.L. (1978). The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus,
OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.
Hawkins, R. O., Morrison, J. Q., Musti-Rao, S., & Hawkins, J. A. (2008). Treatment integrity for academic interventions
in real- world settings. School Psychology Forum, 2(3), 1-15.
Kratochwill, T. R., Clements, M. A., & Kalymon, K. M. (2007). Response to intervention: Conceptual and
methodological issues in implementation. In Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (Eds.), Handbook
of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer.
Skinner, C. H., Pappas, D. N., & Davis, K. A. (2005). Enhancing academic engagement: Providing opportunities for
responding and influencing students to choose to respond. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 389-403.
Witt, J. C., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Gilbertson, D. (2004). Troubleshooting behavioral interventions. A systematic
process for finding and eliminating problems. School Psychology Review, 33, 363-383.
Yeaton, W. M. & Sechrest, L. (1981). Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments:
Strength, integrity, and effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 156-167.
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
16
17
‘How RTI Works’ Series © 2010 Jim Wright
www.interventioncentral.org 1
Documenting Tier 1 (Classroom) Interventions: A Sample Form
When general-education students begin to struggle with academic or behavioral issues, the classroom teacher will typically select and implement
one or more evidence-based intervention strategies to assist those students. But a strong intervention plan needs more than just well-chosen
interventions. It also requires 4 additional components (Witt, VanDerHeyden, & Gilbertson, 2004): (1) student concerns should be clearly and
specifically defined; (2) one or more methods of formative assessment should be used to track the effectiveness of the intervention; (3) baseline
student data should be collected prior to the intervention; and (4) a goal for student improvement should be calculated before the start of the
intervention to judge whether that intervention is ultimately successful. If a single one of these essential 4 components is missing, the intervention is
to be judged as fatally flawed (Witt, VanDerHeyden, & Gilbertson, 2004) and as not meeting minimum RTI standards.
Teachers need a standard format to use in documenting their ‘Tier 1’ (classroom) intervention plans. The attached form, Tier 1/Classroom
Intervention Planning Sheet, is designed to include all of the essential RTI elements of an effective intervention plan. The form includes space to
document:





Definition of up to two student academic or behavioral problems. The most significant step in selecting an effective classroom intervention is to
correctly identify the target student concern(s) in clear, specific, measureable terms (Bergan, 1995). The teacher selects no more than two
student concerns to address on the intervention plan.
Intervention description. The teacher describes the evidence-based intervention(s) that will be used to address the identified student concern(s).
Intervention delivery. The teacher writes down details necessary for implementing the intervention in the classroom (e.g., where and when the
intervention will be used; the adult-to-student ratio; how frequently the intervention will take place; the length of time each session of the
intervention will last; materials needed for the intervention, etc.
Checkup date. The teacher notes the date at which the intervention will be reviewed to determine whether it has been sufficiently effective.
NOTE: For academic interventions, it is advisable to allow at least 4 instructional weeks before deciding whether the intervention has been
effective.
Assessment data. For each intervention, the teacher selects the type(s) of classroom data that will be collected formatively throughout the
intervention period to judge its effectiveness. For each data source, in turn, the teacher collects baseline data on student performance—and
calculates an outcome goal that the student is expected to attain if the intervention is successful. (During the period in which the intervention is in
effect, the teacher collects ongoing data to judge student performance and attaches that data to the classroom intervention documentation form.)
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
17
18
‘How RTI Works’ Series © 2010 Jim Wright
www.interventioncentral.org 2
While a Tier 1/classroom intervention documentation form is a helpful planning tool, schools should remember that teachers will need other
resources and types of assistance as well to be successful in selecting and using Tier 1 interventions. For example, teachers should have access to
an ‘intervention menu’ that contains evidence-based strategies to address the most common academic and behavioral concerns and should be able
to get coaching support as they learn how to implement new classroom intervention ideas. A future blog entry will review necessary Tier 1 teacher
supports in greater detail.
References
Bergan, J. R. (1995). Evolution of a problem-solving model of consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 6(2), 111-123.
Witt, J. C., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Gilbertson, D. (2004). Troubleshooting behavioral interventions. A systematic process for finding and eliminating
problems. School Psychology Review, 33, 363-383.
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
18
19
‘How RTI Works’ Series © 2010 Jim Wright
www.interventioncentral.org 3
Tier 1/Classroom Intervention Planning Sheet
Teacher/Team: ______________________________________ Date: __________________ Student: _______________________________
Student Problem Definition #1: ________________________________________________________________________________________
Student Problem Definition #2: ________________________________________________________________________________________
[Optional] Person(s) assisting with intervention planning process: _____________________________________________________________
Intervention Description
Describe each intervention that you plan
to use to address the student’s concern(s).
Intervention Delivery
List key details about delivery of the intervention, such as:; (1)
where & when the intervention will be used; (2) the adult-tostudent ratio; (3) how frequently the intervention will take place;
(4) the length of time each session of the intervention will last;.
Check-Up Date
Select a date when the
data will be reviewed to
evaluate the intervention.
Interventions: Essential
Elements (Witt et al., 2004)
 Clear problemdefinition(s)
 Baseline data
 Goal for improvement
 Progress-monitoring
plan
Assessment Data
Note what classroom data will be used to
establish baseline, set a goal for improvement,
and track the student’s progress during this
intervention.
Type(s) of Data to Be Used:
Baseline
Goal by Check-Up
Type(s) of Data to Be Used:
Baseline
.
Goal by Check-Up
Type(s) of Data to Be Used:
Baseline
Goal by Check-Up
Witt, J. C., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Gilbertson, D. (2004). Troubleshooting behavioral interventions. A systematic process for finding and eliminating problems. School
Psychology Review, 33, 363-383.
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
19
20
Tier 1 (Classroom) Interventions: Building Your
School’s Capacity
Directions: Schools must plan carefully to build their capacity to carry out evidence-based Tier 1
interventions in the classroom. Below is an 8-point checklist that schools can follow to expand their
capacity to provide appropriate teacher-led classroom interventions available to all students who
might need them.
† Train Teachers to Write Specific, Measureable, Observable ‘Problem Identification
Statements.
† Inventory Tier 1 Interventions Already in Use.
† Create a Standard Menu of Evidence-Based Tier 1 Intervention Ideas for Teachers.
† Establish Tier 1 Coaching and Support Resources.
† Provide Classroom (Tier 1) Problem-Solving Support to Teachers.
† Set Up a System to Locate Additional Evidence-Based Tier 1 Intervention Ideas.
† Create Formal Guidelines for Teachers to Document Tier 1 Strategies.
† Develop Decision Rules for Referring Students from Tier 1 to Higher Levels of
Intervention.
† Train Teachers to Write Specific, Measureable, Observable ‘Problem Identification
Statements’. Teachers are able to describe common student academic and behavioral problems
accurately in specific, observable, measurable terms.
If training in this skill is required, how will teachers receive this training? _____________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
If training is required, who will provide the training? _____________________________________
Tip: Review past student cases referred to your school’s RTI Team (Problem-Solving Team). For
each case, list the primary reason(s) that the student was referred. Review this cumulative list of
referral concerns to determine (a) the kinds of student referral concerns that teachers are most
likely to encounter and (b) whether referring teachers are able to articulate clearly and specifically
their concerns about students.
† Inventory Tier 1 Interventions Already in Use. The school surveys teachers’ current
classroom intervention practices to discover those effective strategies that they are already using.
This information can assist the school in understanding the staff’s present capacity to deliver
classroom interventions, as well as gaps in intervention knowledge and use.
1. Generate a list of 4-6 TOP teacher RTI referral concerns for your school (e.g., ‘lack of
study/organizational skills’, ‘limited content-area vocabulary’).
2. Create a survey form for teachers that lists each top RTI referral concern and asks that
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
20
21
teachers write down those whole-group or individual student strategies that they routinely use
in the classroom to address that concern. Teachers are encouraged to write enough detail so
that the strategy is clear to others. (Note: As a sample survey, review the form Teacher
Survey: What Classroom (Tier 1) Instruction/Intervention Strategies Do You Currently Use?
later in this packet.)
3. Review the surveys. Compile a list of the best teacher strategies—organized by referral
concern. Include only those classroom intervention ideas that are supported by research.
4. Analyze the results on the classroom intervention survey to determine current teacher
intervention practices; variability of intervention use among classrooms, grade levels, teams, or
departments; intervention areas in which teachers require additional training, etc.
Tips:
• Your school can identify potential ‘intervention coaches’ among your staff by reviewing teacher
responses to the intervention surveys. Contact those teachers who list innovative and effective
intervention ideas and ask whether they might be willing to serve as informal ‘intervention
coaches’, being available to demonstrate those strategies to other teachers and coach those
teachers in their use.
• Once your school has created a list of the ‘best’ classroom intervention ideas organized by
referral concern, give a copy of that list to teachers. Point out that staff already routinely
provides Tier 1 interventions to students—and that over time the RTI model will simply build on
this existing capacity.
• Scan the teacher Tier 1 intervention survey results. Select the strongest entries to add to the
schoolwide Tier 1 intervention menu (see next section).
† Create a Standard Menu of Evidence-Based Tier 1 Intervention Ideas for Teachers. When
given a menu of evidence-based classroom interventions, teachers can independently access and
use them to address common student academic and behavioral concerns.
1. Generate a list of the academic and behavioral concerns for which your teachers appear most
in need of classroom intervention strategies (e.g., ‘reading fluency’, ‘inattention in class’).
(Note: To record these areas of student concern, you can use the form Grade- or BuildingWide Student Academic / Behavioral Concerns for Which Tier 1 Intervention Menus Will Be
Developed that appears later in this packet.)
2. For each common student concern, locate evidence-based intervention ideas from research
journals and other print publications, websites, etc.
3. Write each intervention idea in a teacher-friendly format, including sufficient detail for the
instructor to implement the strategy in the classroom. Organize all of the collected ideas into a
Tier 1 intervention menu. Group each intervention under the appropriate category of teacher
concern (e.g., ‘reading fluency’, ‘inattention in class’). Share these intervention menus with
teachers.
Tip: The What Works Clearinghouse has an expanding series of ‘practice guides’ with empirically
supported classroom ideas for instruction and behavior management. These guides are one good
source for Tier 1 intervention ideas. You can review these practice guides at:
http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
† Establish Tier 1 Coaching and Support Resources. Teachers are encouraged to access
colleagues as needed who can demonstrate how to use effective Tier 1 interventions—and can
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
21
22
also provide coaching and feedback in those intervention skills.
1. Identify personnel in your school (and perhaps district-wide) who can be available to meet with
teachers as intervention coaches.
2. Train these personnel to be effective Tier 1 coaches by ensuring that they follow a structured
sequence in their coaching: a. meet with the teacher to select one or more ideas from the
school’s Tier 1 intervention menu, b. show the teacher how to use each selected strategy, c.
go into the teacher’s class if needed to demonstrate the strategy, d. observe the teacher use
the strategy and give performance feedback.
3. Compile a list of people in the school who can serve as intervention coaches. Share that list
with teachers. Include information about how teachers can contact coaches and how to
schedule coaching sessions.
Tip: Find creative ways to make Tier 1 intervention coaching time-efficient. If your school has
grade-level / teaching team / department meetings, for example, consider bringing coaches to
those meetings occasionally to show all teachers how to use interventions for shared concerns.
†Provide Classroom (Tier 1) Problem-Solving Support to Teachers. Teachers can reach out
to colleagues for additional Tier 1 classroom intervention ideas that they can try before referring a
student to higher levels of intervention.
OPTION A: Time is regularly reserved at grade-level / teaching team / department meetings for
teachers to bring students up for discussion. The team and teacher generate a list of evidencebased interventions that the teacher can implement.
How frequently will this team meet to discuss students struggling at Tier 1? __________________
How will those intervention ideas be documented? ______________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
OPTION B: The school generates a list of building-level (and perhaps district-level) personnel who
can serve as Tier 1 intervention consultants, meeting individually with teachers to brainstorm
classroom intervention ideas.
How will this consultant list be developed and shared with teachers? _______________________
______________________________________________________________________________
How will those intervention ideas be documented? ______________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Who are candidates to serve as Tier 1 consultants? (Use attached Tier 1 (Classroom) Intervention
Consultant List).
Tips:
• Invite personnel with specialized training (e.g., reading teachers) to attend grade-level /
teaching team / department Tier 1 intervention planning meetings when appropriate to
generate additional intervention ideas.
• When selecting candidates for a consultant list, prepare a simple anonymous teacher survey.
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
22
23
On that survey, list the most common academic and behavioral concerns that lead to RTI
student referrals in your school. Next to each concern, ask teachers to write in the names of
building (and perhaps district) personnel whom they would seek out for intervention ideas.
Recruit those people for your consultant list whose names appear most frequently on
completed teacher surveys.
† Set Up a System to Locate Additional Evidence-Based Tier 1 Intervention Ideas. As
research identifies additional effective classroom strategies, the school is able routinely to learn of
those strategies and add them to its Tier 1 intervention menu.
1. Appoint staff members to serve as ‘knowledge brokers’ who monitor different intervention topic
areas (e.g., inattention in class, study skills, reading fluency, etc.).
2. These knowledge brokers read research journals, attend workshops and otherwise stay
current on emerging research into school intervention in their topic area(s).
3. Knowledge brokers periodically make recommendations to the school on innovative
intervention ideas that should be added to the Tier 1 intervention menu.
Tip: Consider appointing at least two school staff members to serve as knowledge brokers for each
intervention topic area. Sharing responsibilities for staying current on intervention research allows
knowledge brokers to collaborate and pool their knowledge—thus making the task more
manageable.
† Create Formal Guidelines for Teachers to Document Tier 1 Strategies. Teachers have a
single format for documenting their Tier 1 strategies for students who may be referred for higher
levels of intervention.
Create one form that all teachers use to document their classroom interventions in a uniform
manner. (See attached Tier 1 Intervention Planner form as a sample documentation format.)
Tip: Be sure that teachers use the standard classroom intervention documentation form at the
point when they seek out additional Tier 1 intervention ideas from their fellow teachers or school
consultants. Intervention documentation is much easier to do at the point that an intervention is first
planned than after that intervention has already been implemented.
† Develop Decision Rules for Referring Students from Tier 1 to Higher Levels of
Intervention. Teachers know when they have attempted a sufficient number of classroom
strategies for a still-struggling student and should refer the student for more intervention support.
Establish general decision rules to guide teachers in determining whether they have put sufficient
effort into classroom interventions before seeking additional intervention support. These rules
should include:
• The minimum number of evidence-based classroom interventions that the teacher should
implement and document.
• The minimum period of time that classroom interventions should typically be implemented
before teachers should consider a higher level of RTI intervention.
• The expected documentation that teachers should complete describing their Tier 1/classroom
intervention efforts.
Tip: Include teachers in the development of decision rules for Tier 1 interventions. When
presenting those decision rules to school faculty, be sure to emphasize that the decision rules are
simply a formal structured version of good instruction and behavior management.
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
23
24
Consultant
Tier 1 (Classroom) Intervention Consultant List
Area(s) of Expertise
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
24
25
Grade- or Building-Wide Student Academic / Behavioral Concerns for Which Tier 1 Intervention
Menus Will Be Developed
School: ________________________________________________________________
Academic Concerns
Behavioral Concerns
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
25
26
Teacher Survey: What Classroom (Tier 1) Instruction/Intervention
Strategies Do You Currently Use?
Name: ______________________________________________ Da te: _____________________
Directions. For the academic or behavioral concern below, write down those whole-group or
individual student strategies that you routinely use in the classroom to address that concern.
Please write enough detail so that your strategy is clear to those reviewing this survey.
If we share any of your intervention ideas with staff, may we cite you as the source? __Y __N
Academic or Behavioral Concern: ___________________________________________________
1.
Teacher Strategy
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
26
27
‘How RTI Works’ Series © 2010 Jim Wright
www.interventioncentral.org 1
Intervention Script Builder for: Student Name: _________________________
Teacher/Team: ____________________________
Grade: _________
Intervention Start Date: _____/___/____
Description of the Target Academic or Behavior Concern: ________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Intervention
Check
This step
took place
Y__ N__
Intervention Preparation Steps: Describe any preparation (creation or
purchase of materials, staff training, etc.) required for this intervention.
1. _______________________________________________________
This step
took place
Y__ N__
2. _______________________________________________________
This step
took place
Y__ N__
3. _______________________________________________________
Intervention
Check
This step
took place
Y__ N__
This step
took place
Y__ N__
This step
took place
Y__ N__
This step
took place
Y__ N__
This step
took place
Y__ N__
This step
took place
Y__ N__
Intervention Steps: Describe the steps of the intervention. Include enough
detail so that the procedures are clear to all who must implement them.
1. _______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
2. _______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
3. _______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
4. _______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
5. _______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
6. _______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
Negotiable? (Hawkins
et al., 2008)
 Negotiable Step
 Non-Negotiable
Step
 Negotiable Step
 Non-Negotiable
Step
 Negotiable Step
 Non-Negotiable
Step
Negotiable? (Hawkins
et al., 2008)
 Negotiable Step
 Non-Negotiable
Step
 Negotiable Step
 Non-Negotiable
Step
 Negotiable Step
 Non-Negotiable
Step
 Negotiable Step
 Non-Negotiable
Step
 Negotiable Step
 Non-Negotiable
Step
 Negotiable Step
 Non-Negotiable
Step
27
28
‘How RTI Works’ Series © 2010 Jim Wright
www.interventioncentral.org 2
Research Citation(s) / References: List the published source(s) that make this a ‘scientifically
based’ intervention.
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Intervention Quality Check: How will data be collected to verify that this intervention is put into
practice as it was designed? (Select at least one option.)

Classroom Observation: Number of observations planned? ______________
Person responsible for observations?: _______________________________

Teacher Intervention Rating Log: How frequently will the teacher rate intervention followthrough?
Daily___ Weekly ___

Teacher Verbal Report: Who will check in with the teacher for a verbal report of how the
intervention is progressing? ________________________________________________
Approximately when during the intervention period will this verbal ‘check in’ occur? _________

Rating Intervention Follow-Through: Select either the classroom teacher/team or an outside
observer to rate the quality of the intervention and check the appropriate set of directions
below.
___Teacher Directions: Make copies of this intervention script. Once per week, review the
steps in the intervention script and note (Y/N) whether each step was typically followed. Then
write any additional notes about the intervention in the blank below
___ Independent Observer Directions: Make copies of this intervention script. At several points
during the intervention, make an appointment to observe the intervention in action. While
observing the intervention, go through the steps in the intervention script and note (Y/N)
whether each step was typically followed. Then write any additional notes about the
intervention in the space below
Intervention Observation Notes: _________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Reference
Hawkins, R. O., Morrison, J. Q., Musti-Rao, S., & Hawkins, J. A. (2008). Treatment integrity for academic
interventions in real- world settings. School Psychology Forum, 2(3), 1-15.
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
28
29
‘How RTI Works’ Series © 2010 Jim Wright
www.interventioncentral.org 1
Intervention Contact Log
Staff Member(s) Implementing Intervention: ___________________________________________________________
Classroom/Location: ______________________ Intervention Description: _________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Students in Group: (Note: Supplemental intervention groups generally should be capped at 6-7 students.)
1.
____________________________
7.
____________________________
4.
____________________________
2.
____________________________
8.
____________________________
5.
____________________________
3.
____________________________
9. ____________________________
6. ____________________________
AM
AM
Date: _________ Time Start: ___ : ____ PM Time End: ___ : ____ PM Students Attending: ________________________________
To what degree were you able to carry out the intervention as designed? Comments: ______________________________________
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
____________________________________________________
Not at all
Somewhat
Fully
AM
AM
Date: _________ Time Start: ___ : ____ PM Time End: ___ : ____ PM Students Attending: ________________________________
To what degree were you able to carry out the intervention as designed? Comments: ______________________________________
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
____________________________________________________
Not at all
Somewhat
Fully
AM
AM
Date: _________ Time Start: ___ : ____ PM Time End: ___ : ____ PM Students Attending: ________________________________
To what degree were you able to carry out the intervention as designed? Comments: ______________________________________
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
____________________________________________________
Not at all
Somewhat
Fully
AM
AM
Date: _________ Time Start: ___ : ____ PM Time End: ___ : ____ PM Students Attending: ________________________________
To what degree were you able to carry out the intervention as designed? Comments: ______________________________________
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
____________________________________________________
Not at all
Somewhat
Fully
AM
AM
Date: _________ Time Start: ___ : ____ PM Time End: ___ : ____ PM Students Attending: ________________________________
To what degree were you able to carry out the intervention as designed? Comments: ______________________________________
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
____________________________________________________
Not at all
Somewhat
Fully
AM
AM
Date: _________ Time Start: ___ : ____ PM Time End: ___ : ____ PM Students Attending: ________________________________
To what degree were you able to carry out the intervention as designed? Comments: ______________________________________
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
____________________________________________________
Not at all
Somewhat
Fully
AM
AM
Date: _________ Time Start: ___ : ____ PM Time End: ___ : ____ PM Students Attending: ________________________________
To what degree were you able to carry out the intervention as designed? Comments: ______________________________________
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
____________________________________________________
Not at all
Somewhat
Fully
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
29
30
‘How RTI Works’ Series © 2010 Jim Wright
www.interventioncentral.org 1
Selecting Methods to Track Intervention Integrity for __________________
Schools can use three general sources of data to obtain direct or indirect information about intervention integrity: (1) work
products and records generated during the intervention, (2) teacher self-reports and self-ratings, and (3) direct classroom
observation of the intervention as it is being carried out. Use this form to select an efficient combination of methods to
measure the overall integrity with which an intervention is being implemented.
Work products and records generated during the intervention. Student work samples and other records such as
intervention contact logs generated naturally as part of the intervention can be collected to give some indication of
intervention integrity (Gansle & Noell, 2007). What work products or other intervention records can be collected to help to
track the integrity of the intervention?
Type of Work Product/ Other Intervention Documentation Person(s) Responsible
Frequency of Data Collection
___________________________________________
_________________________
_________________________
___________________________________________
_________________________
_________________________
___________________________________________
_________________________
_________________________
Teacher self-reports and self-ratings. The teacher or other educators responsible for the intervention can periodically
complete formal or informal self-ratings to provide information whether the intervention is being carried out with integrity
(Gansle & Noell, 2007).. Teacher self-ratings can be done a variety of ways. At the end of each intervention session, for
example, the instructor may complete a brief rating scale (e.g., 0 = intervention did not occur; 4 = intervention was carried
out completely and correctly). Or the teacher may periodically be emailed a short, open-ended intervention integrity
questionnaire. What method(s) of teacher self-reports/self-ratings will be used to track the integrity of this intervention?
Type of Teacher Self-Report or Self-Rating
Person(s) Responsible
Frequency of Data Collection
___________________________________________
_________________________
_________________________
___________________________________________
_________________________
_________________________
___________________________________________
_________________________
_________________________
Direct observation of the intervention steps. The intervention is divided into a series of discrete steps to create an
observation checklist. An observer then visits the classroom with checklist in hand to watch the intervention being
implemented and to note whether each step of the intervention is completed correctly (Roach & Elliott, 2008). The direct
observation of intervention integrity yields a single figure: ‘percentage of intervention steps correctly completed’. To
compute this figure, the observer (1) adds up the number of intervention steps correctly carried out during the observation,
(2) divides that sum by the total number of steps in the intervention, and (3) multiplies the quotient by 100 to calculate the
percentage of steps in the intervention that were done in an acceptable manner.
Who will be responsible for creating an interventionintegrity checklist containing the essential steps of the
intervention?
Who will use the interventionintegrity checklist to conduct
observations of the intervention?
How often or on what dates will
classroom observations of the
intervention be conducted?
___________________________________________
_________________________
_________________________
Gansle, K. A., & Noell, G. H. (2007). The fundamental role of
Roach, A. T., & Elliott, S. N. (2008). Best practices in facilitating
and evaluating intervention integrity. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes
intervention implementation in assessing response to
(Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp.195-208).
intervention. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M.
VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Response to intervention: The science
and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 244-251). New
York: Springer Publishing.
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
30
31
Setting Up and Interpreting Time-Series Charts
Response to Intervention requires that schools collect data on student progress over time to
demonstrate whether an academic or behavioral intervention is working. It is much easier to see
the student’s overall rate of progress when data are converted to a visual display. The time-series
chart is the type of visual display most commonly used to graph student progress. This brief tutorial
will provide guidelines for setting up a time-series chart and interpreting plotted data (Hayes, 1981;
Kazdin,1982).
Components of the time-series chart
Time-series charts are structured in a standardized manner to help viewers to better understand
the data that they display. Some of the charting conventions described below (labeling of the chart
axes, separation of data phases) are standard elements of time-series charts. Other conventions,
such as use of aimlines, are most commonly used when charting Curriculum-Based Measurement
data.
•
Labels of Vertical (‘Y’) and Horizontal (‘X’) Axes. The vertical axis of the chart is labeled with
the ‘behavior’ that is being measured. In the chart displayed in Figure 1, the behavior to be
plotted is ‘Correctly Read Words Per Minute’. The horizontal axis of the chart displays the
timespan during which progress-monitoring took place. Our sample chart shows that the
student was monitored from the dates of January 28 through April 8.
Figure 1: Sample Time-Series Chart With Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) Data
Correctly Read Words Per Minute
110
Vocabulary Review
Peer Tutor: Paired Reading
& Vocabulary Review
100
80
60
A
B
C
40
20
0
•
Baseline
1/28 2/1 2/4
2/11
2/18
2/25
3/4
3/11
3/18
3/25
4/1
4/8
Instructional Days
Phase Changes. The chart is divided into phases, with each phase representing a time period
in which data are collected under similar conditions. Phases are visually separated on the chart
with vertical lines. Each phase is also typically labeled to indicate the intervention condition in
effect during that phase (e.g., ‘Baseline: Teacher whole-group math instruction’). Data
collected within a phase are plotted as a series of connected data points. However, there is
always a break in the plotted data between phases to indicate that the conditions under which
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
31
32
data were collected differed in each phase. In Figure 1, sections A, B, and C of the chart
represent different phases.
•
Baseline Data. RTI Teams will often collect baseline data to determine a student’s starting
point before an intervention is begun. Baseline data provides a snapshot of the student’s level
of academic or behavioral functioning before an individualized intervention is put into place.
Phase A of the chart in Figure 1 shows an example of baseline data points. It is generally
recommended that a minimum of 3-5 data points be collected during the baseline phase. If a
visual inspection reveals that the overall trend of the baseline data is relatively flat or moving in
the direction opposite that desired by school staff, the RTI Team concludes the baseline phase
and implements the intervention. However, if the baseline phase shows a strong positive trend
(moves strongly in the desired direction), the team should delay putting the intervention in
place and continue to monitor student progress, since the instructional or behavioral strategies
being used during the baseline phase are clearly benefiting the child.
•
Progress-Monitoring Data. Once an individualized academic or behavioral intervention has
been put into place for a student student, the RTI Team then monitors the intervention
frequently (e.g., weekly) to track that student’s response to the intervention. Sections B and C
of the chart in Figure 1 display progress-monitoring data collected during two intervention
phases.
Figure 2: CBM Time-Series Chart with Goal Line and Aim Line
Correctly Read Words Per Minute
110
100
80
Vocabulary Review
Baseline
A
Paired Reading &
Vocabulary Review
B
C
Goal Line
60
X
40
X
20
0
1/28 2/1 2/4
Aimline
2/11
2/18
2/25
3/4
3/11
3/18
3/25
4/1
4/8
Instructional Days
•
Plotting Goal Line and Aimline. When charting student progress, it is helpful to include visual indicators
that show the goal that the student is striving to reach as well as the expected rate of progress that the
student is predicted to make.
The goal line is drawn on the chart as a vertical line that represents a successful level of performance.
In Figure 2, the goal line for correctly read words is set at 59 words per minute, the typical skill level in
the classroom of the student being monitored. The aimline is a sloping line that shows the rate at
which the student is predicted to make progress if the intervention is successful. The aimline in Figure 2
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
32
33
shows an expected increase of about 1.5 words per week in reading fluency. By plotting both goal line
and aimline on the progress-monitoring chart, the RTI Team can visually compare the student’s actual
performance on a given day to his or her expected rate of progress (aimline) and eventual goal for
improvement (goal line).
Visual interpretation of time-series data
When data points are plotted on a time-series chart, the observer can use techniques of visual analysis to
uncover meaningful patterns in the data. Trend, variability, and level of data points can all yield significant
clues to help in data interpretation.
•
Trend. Trend is the slope of increase or decrease visible in charted data. A strong trend in the desired
direction during an intervention phase would indicate that the intervention is having the predicted
positive impact. The data series in section B of Figure 3 shows a much stronger upward trend than that
in section A.
Figure 3: Level, Trend, and Variability of Data
Correctly Read Words Per Minute
110
100
Intervention Phase
Baseline
Phase
A
B
80
60
40
20
0
1/28 2/1 2/4
2/11
2/18
2/25
3/4
Instructional Days
•
Variability. The amount of variability, or fluctuation, of data in each phase can have an impact on
progress monitoring. When data in a series show little variability, RTI Teams may need to collect only a
small amount of data to show a clear trend. When there is considerable variability, though, RTI Teams
may be required to collect more data to discern the underlying trend. The data series charted in Phase
B of Figure 3 shows much more variability than the series in Phase A.
•
Level. The level of a data series is the average, or mean, of the data within that series. For example, in
a data series with four values (45,58, 62, 47) , the level (mean) is 53. The level can be a useful method
for summarizing the average for each data phase, particularly when there is a considerable amount of
variability in the data. On a time-series chart, the level of a data series is usually plotted as a horizontal
line corresponding to the mean of the phase. In Figure 3, the level of Phase B (60 correctly read words
per minute) is considerably greater than that of Phase A (34 correctly read words per minute).
Plotting trendlines to determine the underlying ‘trend’ of charted data
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
33
34
Data points plotted on a time-series chart often have considerable fluctuation, or variability, making it difficult
to ‘see’ the underlying trend of the data with any precision. Trendlines are straight lines superimposed on
charted data to show a simplified ‘best estimate’ of the student’s actual rate of progress. This section
presents an easy method for plotting a trendline by hand.
Plotting trendlines with the Tukey method. To plot the trendline using the Tukey method, the observer first
counts up the data-points on the graph and draws two vertical lines that divide the data-points evenly into 3
groupings. (If the number of data-points does not exactly divide into 3 parts, the groupings should be
approximately equal. For example, if the chart contains 11 data-points, they can be divided into groups of 4,
3, and 4 data-points.)
Next, the observer concentrates on the first and third sections of the graph, ignoring the middle section. In
each of the two selected sections, the observer finds the median point on the X (horizontal) and Y (vertical)
axes and marks an "X" on the graph at the place where those points intersect. To locate the median time
(e.g., instructional week) on the horizontal axis of a section, the observer looks at the span of weeks in
which data was collected. For example, if data-points appear for weeks 1- 5 in the first section, the observer
considers the middle, or median, point to be week 3.
Figure 5: Plotting a trendline with the Tukey Method
Correctly Read Words Per Minute
110
Section 1
Step 1: Divide the data series
into 3 equal sections by
drawing 2 vertical lines. (If the
points divide unevenly, group
them approximately.)
Section 3
Section 2
100
80
X
Step 2: In Section 1 and
Section 3, find the median
data point and median
instructional week. In each
section, mark the point on the
graph where the two values
intersect with an ‘X’.
60
X
40
Trendline
20
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Instructional Weeks
Hutton, J. B., Dubes, R., & Muir, S. (1992). Estimating trend in progress monitoring data: A
comparison of simple line-fitting methods. School Psychology Review, 21, 300-312.
15
Step 3: Draw a line through
the two ‘X’s’, extending to the
margins of the graph. This
represents the trendline, or
line of improvement.
To locate the median number of observed behaviors on the vertical axis, the observer examines the datapoints in the graph-section, selecting the median or middle, value from among the range of points. For
example, if data-points for weeks 1- 5 in the first section are 30, 49, 23, 41, and 59, the median (middle)
value is 41. When the observer has found and marked the point of intersect of median X and Y values in
both the first and third sections, a line is then drawn through the two points, extending from the left to the
right margins of the graph. By drawing a line through the 2 X's plotted on the graph, the observer creates a
trendline that provides a reasonably accurate visual summary of progress.
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
34
35
References
Hayes, S.C. (1981). Single case experimental design and empirical clinical practice. Journal of Consulting
and Clinical Psychology, 49, 193-211.
Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York:
Oxford Press.
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
35
Student: _____________________ Classrm/Grade: ________________ Monitoring Level:
WEEK 1 WEEK 2
BASELINE
______-____ ___-___ ___-___
______-____ ___-___ ___-___
WEEK 3 WEEK 4
___-___ ___-___
___-___ ___-___
WEEK 5
___-___
___-___
WEEK 6 WEEK 7
___-___ ___-___
___-___ ___-___
WEEK 8 WEEK 9
___-___ ___-___
___-___ ___-___
36
WEEK 10 WEEK 11 WEEK 12
___-___ ___-___ ___-___
___-___
___-___ ___-___
100
80
Frustrational 1-2
Instr’l 1-2
Frustrational 3+
60
40
20
0
BASELINE
M T W T FM T W T F M T W T FM T W T F M T W T FM T W T F
M T W T FM T W T F
M T W T FM T W T F
Direct assessment and intervention (2nd ed ) New York: Guilford
120
(Grade Norms from Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems:
Mastery 1-2
Instr’l 3+
Mastery 3+
Correctly Read Words Per Minute
140
M T W T FM T W T F
Instructional Days
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
36
WEEK 1 WEEK 2
BASELINE
______-____ ___-___ ___-___
______-____ ___-___ ___-___
WEEK 3 WEEK 4
___-___ ___-___
___-___ ___-___
WEEK 5
___-___
___-___
WEEK 6 WEEK 7
___-___ ___-___
___-___ ___-___
WEEK 8 WEEK 9
___-___ ___-___
___-___ ___-___
WEEK 10 WEEK 11 WEEK 12
___-___ ___-___ ___-___
___-___
___-___ ___-___
50
Mastery 4+
Mastery 1-3
60
Instructional 4+
40
30
20
10
0
BASELINE
M T W T FM T W T F
M T W T FM T W T F
M T W T FM T W T F
M T W T FM T W T F
M T W T FM T W T F
M T W T FM T W T F
Instructional Days
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
37
Direct assessment and intervention (2nd ed ) New York: Guilford
70
(Grade Norms from Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems:
80
Frustr’l 1-3 Instr’l 1-3
Frustraitional 4+
Correct Digits Per 2 Minutes: Problem Type(s):______________________
37
Student: _____________________ Classrm/Grade: _____________________ Monitoring Level:
38
WEEK 1 WEEK 2
BASELINE
______-____ ___-___ ___-___
______-____ ___-___ ___-___
WEEK 3 WEEK 4
___-___ ___-___
___-___ ___-___
WEEK 5
___-___
___-___
WEEK 6 WEEK 7
___-___ ___-___
___-___ ___-___
WEEK 8 WEEK 9
___-___ ___-___
___-___ ___-___
WEEK 10 WEEK 11 WEEK 12
___-___ ___-___ ___-___
___-___
___-___ ___-___
Academic skills problems: Direct
assessment and intervention (2nd ed.). New
York: Guilford.
140
(Grade Norms from Shapiro, E. S. (1996).
___Total Words ___#Correctly Spelled Words
Writing Sample Per 3 Minutes:___# Correct Writing Sequences ___ #Correct Punctuation
Student: _____________________ Classrm/Grade: _____________________ Monitoring Level:
120
100
80
Writing Norms
(# Correct
Spellings)
60
6th GR/53 Wds
5th GR/49 Wds
4th GR/41 Wds
40
3rd GR/37 Wds
2nd GR/28 Wds
20
0
1st GR /15 Wds
BASELINE
M T W T FM T W T F M T W T FM T W T F M T W T FM T W T F
M T W T FM T W T F
M T W T FM T W T F
M T W T FM T W T F
Instructional Days
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
38
Behavior/Skill to Measure: ___________________________
39
Student: _____________________ Classrm/Grade: _____________________ Monitoring Level:
WEEK 1 WEEK 2
BASELINE
______-____ ___-___ ___-___
______-____ ___-___ ___-___
WEEK 3 WEEK 4
___-___ ___-___
___-___ ___-___
WEEK 5
___-___
___-___
WEEK 6 WEEK 7
___-___ ___-___
___-___ ___-___
WEEK 8 WEEK 9
___-___ ___-___
___-___ ___-___
WEEK 10 WEEK 11 WEEK 12
___-___ ___-___ ___-___
___-___
___-___ ___-___
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
BASELINE
M T W T FM T W T F M T W T FM T W T F M T W T FM T W T F
M T W T FM T W T F
M T W T FM T W T F
M T W T FM T W T F
Instructional Days
Jim Wright, Presenter
www.interventioncentral.org
39