Healthier, Happier, Better
Developing Birmingham’s Joint Health and Wellbeing
Strategy
2012 - 2015
FOREWORD
Thank you for agreeing to be part of the consultation process for Birmingham
Health and Wellbeing Strategy.
This strategy is an opportunity for us to be clear about our vision for the health
and wellbeing of our City, and identify what the key partners – the City Council,
NHS and others – will do together to achieve it. We want our citizens to be
able to live healthier and happier lives, and for the services we commission to
be better at supporting this.
The Strategy is not a statement of everything we need to do in health, public
health and social care in Birmingham.
The strategy is a statement of what our most important priorities in health and
care should be. These priorities have been chosen through consensus by
stakeholders reflecting on the JSNA, the evidence, their knowledge and
experience.
This strategy is not just about health and social care. Many of the most
challenging health issues in Birmingham are significantly affected by
educational attainment, standard of living (good employment) and other
factors like the places we live in. This strategy seeks to reflect that.
This consultation version asks whether you agree with these priorities and asks
for additional comments. This is your opportunity to help shape our strategy
further; I would welcome your input, so we can get this right.
Councillor Steve Bedser
Cabinet Member, Health and Wellbeing
Birmingham City Council
Chair, Birmingham Health and Wellbeing Board
INTRODUCTION
The Health and Wellbeing Strategy is required by the Health and Social Care
Act 2012. It is part of the roadmap of getting to shared understanding of what
we need to commission.
The Health and Wellbeing Board is a new partnership which will deliver real
improvements in people’s health and wellbeing. With representatives from
health, councils and the Local Involvement Network (LINk), the Board will work
across organisations to improve the health and wellbeing of people living in
Birmingham. The Board wants to focus on the areas where working together in
new ways will have the largest impact on people’s health and wellbeing. The
health and wellbeing strategy for Birmingham is a plan which will set out how
the Board will help as many people as live equally healthy and fulfilling lives.
We’ve made a start in identifying the main areas we think we should focus on
in this plan, but we want to know what you think before we develop the
strategy any further.
As the diagram below shows, this starts with gathering evidence and insight,
goes on to bringing this together in the JSNA and then goes on to development
of the Strategy.
Our plan needs to address both health and wellbeing. A huge range of factors
can influence people’s health and wellbeing – not only health issues like
smoking and obesity, but also feeling safe, independent and part of their
communities. But we can't do everything we would like to do all at once. So we
have picked priorities where the health service and local government can make
a real difference by working together. And there are some issues which we
cannot afford to ignore.
The Strategy is not intended to be an exhaustive compendium of everything
we need to do in health, public health and social care in Birmingham; it is
intended to identify those most important issues.
Equally, it is not a detailed plan of everything Birmingham City Council, the
NHS and other partners will do to improve and protect the health of our
population.
Just as the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment seeks to identify the most
pressing priorities which we need to work on together, so the strategy is a
statement of the most pressing needs which cause high levels of avoidable illhealth, death or disability and/or where there is significant opportunity to
improve outcomes for people and the efficiency of services.
The specific priorities suggested are identified below. Further on in this
document, we have a more detailed table where we want your help. That table
identifies the priorities, the need from the Overview JSNA, what we and
partners can do and why should we do those things, and asks you for your
views.
WHAT PRIORITIES HAVE WE CHOSEN?
Giving every child the best start in life


Enabling all children
to young people and
adults to maximise
their capabilities and
have control over
their lives
Developing well – childhood
into adulthood




Ageing well




Dying well


Create fair employment and good work for all.




Ensure Healthy Standard of living for all


REDUCE LIFE EXPECTANCY
DIFFERENCES WITH A FOCUS ON
PERINATAL AND INFANT
MORTALITY
GOOD MENTAL WELLBEING
ACROSS THE POPULATION
REDUCE CHILD POVERT IN THE CITY
IMPROVE HEALTH AND WELLBEING
AND REDUCE HEALTH INEQUALITIES
FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG
PEOPLE
GOOD MENTAL WELLBEING
ACROSS THE POPULATION
REDUCE CHILD POVERTY IN THE
CITY
THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT
VARIATIONS IN HEALTHY LIFE
EXPECTANCY ACROSS
BIRMINGHAM
REDUCING AND MANAGING
FRAILTY IN OLDER PEOPLE
IMPROVE HEALTH AND WELLBEING
FOR OLDER PEOPLE
ACCESS TO AND QUALITY OF CARE
FOR CARERS VARIES
SIGNIFICANTLY ACROSS THE CITY
WE PERFORM SIGNIFICANTLY
BEHIND ENGLAND IN ENABLING
PEOPLE TO CHOOSE THEIR PLACE
OF DEATH
MORE NEEDS TO BE KNOWN
ABOUT THE QUALITY OF CARE
RECEIVED AT END OF LIFE
INCREASE EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITIES IN BIRMINGHAM
IMPROVE EDUCATIONAL
OPPORTUNITIES AND ATTAINMENT
IN POOREST AREAS
PROMOTE HEALTHIER LIFESTYLES
IN THE WORKPLACE
REDUCE CHILD POVERTY IN THE
CITY
REDUCE INEQUALITIES IN HEALTH
FACED BY COMMUNITIES OF
INTEREST AND IDENTITY
IMPROVE THE EMPLOYMENT
PROSPECTS OF THOSE WITH
DISABILITIES
Create and develop healthy sustainable homes and
communities




Strengthen the role and impact of ill Health
prevention


ENSURE DECENT HOMES FOR
CITIZENS WITH A FOCUS ON
PRIVATE SECTOR
DELIVER A HEALTHIER AND SAFER
ENVIRONMENT
IMPROVING POPULATION MENTAL
WELLBEING
REDUCE THE BURDEN OF
PREVENTABLE NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASE
INCLUDING HARM FROM
TOBACCO, ALCOHOL AND DRUGS
IMPROVING MENTAL WELLBEING
SUPPORT CARERS
HOW HAVE WE CHOSEN OUR PRIORITIES?
The priorities in this draft strategy have been chosen through consensus by
stakeholders reflecting on the JSNA, the evidence, their knowledge and
experience. There will almost certainly be detailed implementation plans for
specific issues which sit underneath this. That’s why, because health
inequalities in Birmingham remain a significant issue, a separate health
inequalities plan is being produced.
The needs and priorities in the Strategy have come from the Overview Joint
Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) chosen by the many stakeholders who have
worked with us so far. The JSNA is a process that results in a document that
identifies at a city-wide level the health and care needs of its population. In
Birmingham we have through discussion and agreement adopted the Marmot
Priorities (Headings of the tables below) as the structure for the Overview JSNA
and the Health and Wellbeing Strategy
PRIORITIES AND YOUR INPUT
In this document, we’ve explained why and how we’ve chosen these initial priority areas for the health and wellbeing
strategy. We want to know what you think about the way we’ve chosen them, and if you think we should include anything
else. We’d like to hear from individuals, groups and organisations.
 Do you agree with these priorities? If no, what do you feel we should do?
 Are there any specific actions we need to take within each priority?
 Which partnerships are currently in place that can help us deliver against these priorities?
We will be arranging stakeholder events and also putting this document online to encourage as many stakeholders as
possible to comment and give their input and insight.
This consultation runs from July to September 2012.
WAYS TO RESPOND
By email to: [email protected]
Or by post to: Kulwant Ghaleigh, Information and Intelligence, Birmingham Public Health, Gee House, Holborn Hill,
Aston, Birmingham, B7 5JR
This process would be helped if respondents making comments could make them directly in the relevant boxes in this
document
Thank You
Giving every child the best start in life
What does the JSNA
say?
What should we and
partners do
REDUCE LIFE EXPECTANCY
DIFFERENCES WITH A
FOCUS ON PERINATAL
AND INFANT MORTALITY




Invest resources in home
visiting programmes
through professional and
Para professional
services for both pre and
post birth
Use children’s centres
more effectively for early
years development and
parenting in deprived
communities including
cognitive and social
development pathways
for deprived children (to
help with school
readiness)
Target mothers at high
risk of perinatal mortality
for early intervention
and support
Effective targeting of
these services through
intelligence led
commissioning
Why should we do these
things (Evidence/Nice
Guidance)
Home visiting programmes show
evidence of improved parenting
skills, child development, reduced
behavioural problems and
improved maternal mental health
and social functioning.
Are these
priorities
broadly right
for
Birmingham?
YES / NO
COMMENTS – What have
we missed?

Focus on young children
in troubled families

Invest in good quality
nursery provision and
both they and children’s
centres apply easy
interventions for
emotional wellbeing
Reduce bullying and selfharm in school-age
children
Effective targeting of
these services through
intelligence led
commissioning
Develop and implement
consistent universal to
specialist mental health
model for children
Continue to develop
emotional resilience
work in schools
Develop interventions for
looked after children
using the Scottish
experience
GOOD MENTAL
WELLBEING ACROSS THE
POPULATION





Attending high quality pre-school
acts as a protective factor and has
a disproportionately positive
impact on the development of
disadvantaged children.
Targeted health programmes are
effective in impacting on certain
health outcomes namely in
mental health, healthy eating and
physical activity.
Early identification for children at
risk and early referral into
appropriate mental wellbeing
services

REDUCE CHILD POVERTY
IN THE CITY



Use intelligence to target
families and children in
most poverty
Bring together financial
inclusion interventions in
a single package (school
meals, benefits etc)
Proactively work with
children in poverty on
developmental goals
including early school
performance and
cognitive and emotional
development
Develop pathways into
skills development and
work for parents/carers
of children
Improving the environment that
the child grows up in, ensuring
access to health care services,
good quality education, providing
financial incentives either
through benefit schemes or tax
regime and promoting family
values impacts on breaking the
cycle of poverty
Enabling all children to young people and adults to maximise their capabilities and have control over
their lives.
Developing well – childhood into adulthood
What does the JSNA
say?
What should we and
partners do
IMPROVE HEALTH AND
WELLBEING AND REDUCE
HEALTH INEQUALITIES FOR
CHILDREN AND YOUNG
PEOPLE



GOOD MENTAL
WELLBEING ACROSS THE
POPULATION

REDUCE CHILD POVERTY
IN THE CITY


In addition to
interventions above:
Emotional resilience
programmes in schools
as part of development
A whole school day
approach to nutrition
and physical activity
Including parents/carers
of obese/overweight
children in nutrition and
weight management
programmes
Target young people who
start smoking
Continue modernising
learning disabilities
commissioning and
services
Why should we do these
things (Evidence/Nice
Guidance)
Good Quality early childhood
education and care can help
address inequalities in life
chance.
High quality pre-school
programmes are effective in
improving self-esteem and
behaviour especially on those
children from disadvantaged
backgrounds. It has enduring
effects on both health and other
outcomes.
Evidence based and targeted
across the social gradient
parenting programmes can
improve maternal psycho social
health , contribute to emotional
Are these
priorities
broadly right
for
Birmingham?
YES / NO
COMMENTS – What have
we missed?



Continue to develop the
joint commissioning of
wellbeing and mental
health services to focus
on prevention and early
intervention for all ages
Commission a pathway
for people with mental
health problems which
focuses on prevention
and recovery
Ensure that that health
and dental care
assessments and health
care plans are part of the
overall care plan for
looked after children and
this is carried out on all
children looked after by
the authority. PCTs have
a duty to comply with
requests by local
authorities for help in the
exercise of their
functions.
and behavioural improvements
and , contribute to safer home
environments and reduce
unintentional injury.
Looked after children and young
people share many of the same
health risks and problems as their
peers, but often to a greater
degree. They often enter care
with a worse level of health than
their peers in part due to the
impact of poverty, abuse and
neglect.
.
Enabling all children to young people and adults to maximise their capabilities and have control over
their lives.
Living well across the life course
What does the JSNA
say?
What should we and
partners do


Continue the adult
learning offer for the city
and target those most
deprived for inclusion
Commission
appropriately for
communities of identity
(e.g. non-Eurocentric
mental health models,
lifestyle advice suitable
for all cultures, LGBT
health)
Why should we do these
things (Evidence/Nice
Guidance)
Participation in adult learning
contributes to positive and
substantial changes in health
behaviours
Are these
priorities
broadly right
for
Birmingham?
YES / NO
COMMENTS – What have
we missed?
Enabling all children to young people and adults to maximise their capabilities and have control over
their lives.
Ageing Well
What does the JSNA
say?
What should we and
partners do
THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT
VARIATIONS IN HEALTHY
LIFE EXPECTANCY ACROSS
BIRMINGHAM
REDUCING AND
MANAGING FRAILTY IN
OLDER PEOPLE

IMPROVE HEALTH AND
WELLBEING FOR OLDER
PEOPLE
ACCESS TO AND QUALITY
OF CARE FOR CARERS
VARIES SIGNIFICANTLY
ACROSS THE CITY



A universal offer for
older people designed to
keep people well
Invest in selfmanagement and
prevention for people
with existing disease to
keep them independent
and out of
hospital/residential care
Continue to develop
early identification and
prevention programmes
for older people
especially (Falls, stroke,
dementia etc.)
Evidence based lifestyle
services should be
tailored and targeted at
the older age population.
Why should we do these
things (Evidence/Nice
Guidance)
Social contact, rewarding
activity, opportunities for
engagement and participation are
essential for the promotion of
wellbeing and mental health.
Vaccination- Influenza and
pneumococcal vaccines are the
most relevant and effective for
preventing illness in old people.
Screening programmes are
effective in diagnosing early signs
or symptoms of disease and
increase likelihood of condition
being cured or managed
effectively.
Falls prevention programmes
have shown to be effective in
Are these
priorities
broadly right
for
Birmingham?
YES / NO
COMMENTS – What have
we missed?

Detailed pathway for frail
elderly from early
identification to intensive
management including
community geriatric
models
Encourage employers to
work with NHS and social
care on preparation for
older age programmes
Continue to invest in tele
care and expand into tele
health
improving health outcomes and
quality of life for older people.
Falls Pathways

A housing for life
pathway to ensure
peoples’ homes are
suitable to support
maximum independence

Ensure that intermediate
care is available as part
of a pathway for
management back to
independence. Link this
pathway to enablement
etc.
Tele care and technology is
focused primarily on preventative
secondary care. The current
evidence base in the UK is
growing and shows positive gains
for individuals and services. . The
evidence base for which
components are more effective is
still under developed.


Housing adaptations and practical
support to improve older
people’s homes can promote
autonomy, to prevent illness and
reduce demands on both families
and services. Low level practical
interventions can have an impact
on both quality of life and health
and wellbeing.
Effective Intermediate Care –
qualitative and quantitative
evidence to suggest that effective
intermediate care makes a
significant difference to people’s
lives, reduce avoidable hospital
admissions and premature
admission to long term
residential care.
Enabling all children to young people and adults to maximise their capabilities and have control over
their lives.
Dying well
What does the JSNA
say?
What should we and
partners do
WE PERFORM
SIGNIFICANTLY BEHIND
ENGLAND IN ENABLING
PEOPLE TO CHOOSE THEIR
PLACE OF DEATH

MORE NEEDS TO BE
KNOWN ABOUT THE
QUALITY OF CARE
RECEIVED AT END OF LIFE

Implement the Gold
Standards Framework
(Nice Guidance) across
the city
Ensure that there is a
detailed pathway for end
of life care
Why should we do these
things (Evidence/Nice
Guidance)
Gold Standards Framework is a
systematic evidence based
approach that has been
developed to deliver the best
care for patients nearing their
end of life
Are these
priorities
broadly right
for
Birmingham?
YES / NO
COMMENTS – What have
we missed?
Create fair employment and good work for all.
What does the JSNA
say?
What should we and
partners do
INCREASE EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITIES IN
BIRMINGHAM

IMPROVE EDUCATIONAL
OPPORTUNITIES AND
ATTAINMENT IN POOREST
AREAS


PROMOTE HEALTHIER
LIFESTYLES IN THE
WORKPLACE

Develop pathways for
people with mental
health problems on
incapacity benefit for
return to work
Develop programmes for
people who have been
out of work for more
than five years
Continue economic
development agenda to
create more jobs
Join up return to work
agenda with adult
education
Why should we do these
things (Evidence/Nice
Guidance)
Evidence suggests that increasing
pay and qualifications contributes
to a good quality early years
workforce which in turn has a
positive impact on health
outcomes.
From the 10 core components
that protects good health and
promotes health- the three most
effective areas to focus on are –
reducing physical and chemical
hazards and injuries at work:
Shift work and other work time
factors Improving the
psychosocial environment.
Combining changes to the work
environment with healthy
lifestyle interventions increases
changes in health adopting
Are these
priorities
broadly right
for
Birmingham?
YES / NO
COMMENTS – What have
we missed?
behaviours across the social
gradient.
Ensure Healthy Standard of living for all
What does the JSNA
say?
What should we and
partners do
REDUCE CHILD POVERTY
IN THE CITY
REDUCE INEQUALITIES IN
HEALTH FACED BY
COMMUNITIES OF
INTEREST AND IDENTITY
IMPROVE THE
EMPLOYMENT PROSPECTS
OF THOSE WITH
DISABILITIES




In addition to the
interventions above and
below:
Ensure a specific plan for
health inequalities is
implemented
Increase the educational
attainment of the City’s
children and young
people
Continue with inward
investment and
economic renewal
strategies
Why should we do these
things (Evidence/Nice
Guidance)
Citizens need to have a sufficient
income to live a healthy life.
Evidence suggests that social
protection systems lead to better
population health outcomes.
Local initiatives that help support
people with benefits advice and
employment initiatives that
guarantee minimum income have
proven to be successful in helping
people move into work.
Are these
priorities
broadly right
for
Birmingham?
YES / NO
COMMENTS – What have
we missed?
Create and develop healthy sustainable homes and communities
What does the JSNA
say?
What should we and
partners do
ENSURE DECENT HOMES
FOR CITIZENS WITH A
FOCUS ON PRIVATE
SECTOR


DELIVER A HEALTHIER AND
SAFER ENVIRONMENT

IMPROVING POPULATION
MENTAL WELLBEING



Using a Healthy Urban
Development focus along
the lines developed in
Bristol and elsewhere
Continue the health and
climate change plan work
to address extreme
weather
Ensure green space and
environmental
infrastructure is an
essential part of
development plans
Improve public realm
especially streetscapes
for cycling and safety for
older people (Cochrane
systematic reviews on
this) including traffic
calming in hotspots
Reduce dependency on
cars and a shift to public
transport
Ensure a high quality
Why should we do these
things (Evidence/Nice
Guidance)
NICE guidance reports that an
integrated approach between
policies that impact on the
climate and policies that create
healthier communities with a
focus on addressing health
inequalities
Interventions need to both
improve road safety as well as
increase physical activity.(NICE)
Well maintained and good street
lighting of pavements and
footpaths, with cycling paths
increases number of walkers and
cyclist.
Targeted traffic calming zones
and pedestrian crossing can help
reduce inequalities in road
injuries in deaths. Targeting
should not be just based on high
accident prone areas but based
on deprived residential areas
Are these
priorities
broadly right
for
Birmingham?
YES / NO
COMMENTS – What have
we missed?





public realm which is
safe and secure, starting
with most deprived areas
Continue work on
housing decency
especially energy
efficiency and target
homes with children in
poverty
Work with business s and
economic development
to improve choice of
healthy food
Work with business on a
local health responsibility
deal for healthy living
Food access programme
to improve coverage of
healthy food across the
city
Continue healthy
catering awards for
schools and caterers
focusing on deprived
areas
and areas of a higher density of
older population.
Access to good quality green
space has positive impact on both
physical and mental health and
wellbeing.
Some evidence suggests that the
proximity or lack of access to
unhealthy food contributes to
obesity or malnutrition.
Relationship with poor housing
and health is well evidenced.
Improvements in housing
conditions have a number of
positive impacts on health.
Addressing fuel poverty will
improve health outcomes,
especially when targeted at those
living in private rented or owner
occupied tenures.
Area based initiatives have
demonstrated some limited
successes, strategic input and
long term commitment to such
programmes is recommended
interventions need to both
improve road safety as well as
increase physical activity.(NICE)
Well maintained and good street
lighting of pavements and
footpaths, with cycling paths
increases number of walkers and
cyclist.
Access to good quality green
space has positive impact on both
physical and mental health and
wellbeing.
Some evidence suggests that the
proximity or lack of access to
unhealthy food contributes to
obesity or malnutrition.
Relationship with poor housing
and health is well evidenced.
Improvements in housing
conditions have a number of
positive impacts on health.
Initiatives include warm front,
decent homes programme and
programmes to address fuel
poverty can contribute to
improvements in health and
wellbeing.

Initiatives including
warm front, decent
homes programme and
Addressing fuel poverty will
improve health outcomes,
especially when targeted at those
programmes to address
fuel poverty need ongoing investment
particularly in the private
rented sector.
living in private rented or owner
occupied tenures.
Evidence suggests that including
communities and individuals in
the design of interventions that
tackle social isolation at a local
level helps improve the
effectiveness of those
interventions.
Area based initiatives have
demonstrated some limited
successes, strategic input and
long term commitment to such
programmes is recommended.
Strengthen the role and impact of ill Health prevention
What does the JSNA
say?
What should we and
partners do
REDUCE THE BURDEN OF
PREVENTABLE NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASE
INCLUDING HARM FROM
TOBACCO, ALCOHOL AND
DRUGS
IMPROVING MENTAL
WELLBEING
SUPPORT CARERS






In addition to
interventions above
Ensure primary care
screens adults of working
age early for noncommunicable disease
risk
Develop a pathway with
strong behavioural
science input for people
identified at increased
risk
Identify and target young
people who are obese or
who smoke for early
intervention
Use an intelligence led
approach to target those
with ill health most at
risk of avoidable
hospitalisation for selfmanagement
programmes
Invest in self-
Why should we do these
things (Evidence/Nice
Guidance)
Citizens need to have a sufficient
income to live a healthy life.
Evidence suggests that social
protection systems lead to better
population health outcomes.
Local initiatives that help support
people with benefits advice and
employment initiatives that
guarantee minimum income have
proven to be successful in helping
people move into work.
Integrated approach between
those policies that impact on the
climate and policies that create
healthier communities – with a
focus on addressing health
inequalities
Interventions need to both
improve road safety as well as
increase physical activity.(NICE)
Improved cycling infrastructure
Are these
priorities
broadly right
for
Birmingham?
YES / NO
COMMENTS – What have
we missed?

management
programmes which have
higher behavioural
science content
Continue with fuel
poverty, winter warmth
and environmental
agendas
especially in more populated
areas increases the number of
cyclists and number of cycling
trips.
Well maintained and good street
lighting of pavements and
footpaths, with cycling paths
increases number of walkers and
cyclist.
Targeted traffic calming zones
and pedestrian crossing can help
reduce inequalities in road
injuries in deaths. Targeting
should not be just based on high
accident prone areas but based
on deprived residential areas
and also with regards to higher
density of older population.
Access to good quality green
space has positive impact on both
physical and mental health and
wellbeing.
Some evidence suggests that the
proximity or lack of access to
unhealthy food contributes to
obesity or malnutrition.
Relationship with poor housing
and health is well evidenced.
Improvements in housing
conditions have a number of
positive impacts on health.
Initiatives include warm front,
decent homes programme and
programmes to address fuel
poverty can contribute to
improvements in health and
wellbeing.
Addressing fuel poverty will
improve health outcomes,
especially when targeted at those
living in private rented or owner
occupied tenures.
Evidence suggests that including
communities and individuals in
the design of interventions that
tackle social isolation at a local
level helps improve the
effectiveness of those
interventions.
Area based initiatives have
demonstrated some limited
successes, strategic input and
long term commitment to such
programmes is recommended.
What happens next?
This document is an introduction to the priority areas we think we need to focus on first. We need to continue
developing a final strategy which explains how, as well as what, we will focus on, and which incorporates the
views of people who live in Birmingham. To do so, we will:
Listen to your feedback
Write up a final version of the health and wellbeing strategy
Have conversations with key organisations and partner agencies about how we might deliver
improvements in health and wellbeing in these areas – and how we will measure those improvements
Publish the final strategy in the late summer 2012
Continue to talk to you about the health and wellbeing issues that matter to you
The table below shows the timeline we are working to
Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy consultation TIMELINE
Who are we looking to
work with
What are we working with them on
WHEN
HOW
3rd Sector Organisations
JSNA
6 events March 2012
Conferences x 4
JHWBS Overview
Lead commissioners in
statutory agencies
JSNA Overview
Template JHWB
/partners/teachers/3rd
22nd April 2012 Event (140 people BHWB
Partnership
attended)
Summit
Draft JHWBS
Sector
organisations/community Indicator Scrutiny
groups
CCG’s
Link to the JSNA Overview
Key headings of the JHWBS
Thursday 21st June
Email
CCG
Link to draft JWWBS
5th July 2012
Email
PH Consultants
Draft
5th July 2012
Email
Marmot champions
Draft
5th July 2012
Email
Cllr Bedser
Draft
5th July 2012
Email
5th July 2012
Email
31st July 2012
Panel
2nd week of July to end of July .
Faith Groups and LGBT groups
done initially in March and April
and June to develop proposals.
Focus Groups
Lead Councillors
Draft
Peoples Panel
Peoples Panel (40 attendees)
EINA groups include;
Draft and Consultation document
age, disability, gender
reassignment, marriage
and civil partnership,
pregnancy and maternity,
race, religion and belief,
sex, sexual orientation
Golden Age – Older
African Caribbean
women
One Stop – Older
Irish/white women in
Perry Barr
Mothers and mothers to
be – Pakistani/Bengali
women in Sparkbrook
Working Well and 3rd
Sector – Aston, Lozells,
Newtown
Birmingham and Solihull
Cluster Stakeholders
Draft and consultation Document
2nd week of July
Email
Established groups
Meetings
Draft and consultation document
2nd Week July to August
Attendance at
existing
meetings
Established engagement
groups, Community
Connectors, Community
researchers.
Patient Network Groups
Draft and consultation document
2nd week July to August
Focus Groups
Digital Presence
Draft on websites
BVSC plus newsletter
Digital
www.bhwbb.net
Lead commissioners
/partners/teachers/3rd
Sector organisations
Draft
12 July 2012
BHWB
Partnership
Summit on
Wellbeing