Working with Longitudinal Qualitative Data

Working with Longitudinal
Qualitative Data: Using
NVivo as an Analytic Tool
Roger J. Vallance
The University of Notre Dame Australia
Paper presented at the 6th International conference of
Qualitative Research Conference, 21-23 Sept 2005 Durham.
Longitudinal Qualitative research

Research question



Longitudinal qualitative research occurs
when a research question investigating a
development over time or causal
perspective is conducted in a qualitative
methodology
Research sample
Research methodology
Sampling

Repeated cross-sectional samples


Panel study (different styles of panels explored below)


As above
Rotating panel


Once a group of participants are enlisted, the group participants are re-contacted for
each iteration of the research.
Indefinite life panel with replacement


Same individuals are interviewed repeatedly over time.
Indefinite life panel without replacement


Same questions asked of different samples over time.
Sample strategies calls for the research to last longer than average participation.
Participants might be included for 3 or 4 iterations and then replaced according to
the same sample choices as original sample selection.
Overlapping panel

Use of several rotating panel structures so that groups are out of phase in their
replacement cycles.
LQR methodologies



Not restricted to specific methodologies
That said, LQR does not happen by
accident
Distinction between longitudinal and
meta-analysis



Research question
Sample
maybe not approach to analysis and
synthesis
Organising the Data

Attributes



Sets



Information that is relatively unchanging,
That might form a table of values organised in
columns for each participant (row)
Used for more ad hoc or volatile information
Overlapping data sets
Cases

Cases nodes for testing emergent ideas
Attributes in longitudinal analysis
Sets in longitudinal analysis
Cases in longitudinal analysis
Three useful distinctions

Theme



Pattern



Manifest statements of individual participants
Participant perspective
Findings of the research, possibly pro term
Researcher perspective
Topic

Summary of contributions and discussions with
participants.

cf Luborsky 1994 The Identification and Analysis of
Themese and Patterns, in J.F. Gubrium & A. Sankar
Qualitative Methods in Aging Research. Sage.
Longitudinal Analysis


Ideally, unit of analysis is the individual
Analysing each wave


Connecting between the waves


What has changed and how have these changes
occurred
Retrospection


At this point in time What is the qual analysis ?
How did we come to this?
Participant validation

At end of research, chance to validate their stories
Sets scope searches
Connecting between the waves
Bringing it together

Retrospection





Looking back over one’s shoulder
Epiphanies
Turning points
Dead ends and discontinuities
Participant validation


Not always possible
And what does one validate?


Individual analysis
More global views
One view of Longitudinal
Qualitative Analysis






What has changed?
How has it changed?
For whom has it changed?
Why has it changed?
How have they changed?
Where /who are they now?
A second view of Longitudinal
Qualitative Analysis

What has changed for these participants?
[subQ – for this person]


What has caused these observed
changes?


Analyse topics and individual accounts
Analyse themes with field notes
To what extent are these changes global?

Analyse patterns with field notes and memos
New horizons

Qualitative data is growing in volume,
richness, number, extent to which we
can cope with large data collections



Historical inspections of similar projects
possible
Warehousing of data may yield resource of
great value
Might interoperation of CAQDAS be
another step?