www.mmp.uwm.edu Classroom Assessments Based On Standards (CABS) WMC State Mathematics Conference Green Lake, Wisconsin Leadership Pre-conference April 30, 2008 Beth Schefelker, MTS Milwaukee Public Schools [email protected] Joanie Marchillo, MTL Auer Avenue K-8 School, MPS [email protected] Dustine Walker, MTL OW Holmes K-8 School, MPS [email protected] Dr. Kevin McLeod, Mathematician UW Milwaukee [email protected] The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee Partnership Academy (MPA), is supported with funding from the National Science Foundation under Grant No. EHR-0314898. Session Purpose Develop an understanding of the process used to build model CABS (classroom assessments based on standards) for grades K-7. Use the MMP Assessing the Assessment Guide to analyze MPS CABS. Engage in conversation with math teacher leaders regarding the implementation of CABS in their building. Assessment “Of Learning” vs. Assessment “For Learning” Assessments “of learning” are those assessments that happened after learning is supposed to have occurred to determine if it did. Assessment “for learning” happens while learning is still under way. (R.Stiggins, J. Arter, J. Chappuis, S.Chappuis, Classroom Assessments for Student Learning, Doing It Right-Using It Well, 2004) MMP Comprehensive Mathematics Framework (CMF) QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. WKCE Data Analy sis Constructed Response % of students who left blank responses or who scored Ņ0Ópoints on an item Milwau kee Pub lic Schools 2004 Š 2005 Wisconsin Model Academi c Standards 4th Grade Blank Ņ0Ó Points 62% 8th Grade Blank Ņ0Ó Points 6% 56% Mathematical Processes 2% Algebraic Relationships 2% 69% 14% Measurement 2% 31% 6% 56% 10th Grade Currently there are no Constructed Response Items at the 10 th Grade Level 56% Changing the Status Quo! 1. How doeseveryday classroom practice support students’ abili ty to engagein constructed responsequestions? 2. We are about using data, curriculum ali gnment, and eff ective teaching strategies. In what ways can we usetheseprocessesto help push the thinking of teachers and administrators to change this data in the future? Alarming Data WKCE Data Analysis of Constructed Response % of students who left blank responses or who scored Ņ0Ópoints on an item Wisconsin Model Academic Standards Mathematical Processes Algebraic Relationships 4th Grade Year 8th Grade 10th Grade BLANK Ņ0Ó POINTS BLANK Ņ0Ó POINTS BLANK Ņ0Ó POINTS 04-05 2% 62% 6% 56% N/A N/A 06-07 5% 72% 11% 58% 23% 54% 04-05 2% 69% 14% 56% N/A N/A 06-07 2% 53% 3% 22% 23% 54% 04-05 2% 31% 6% 56% N/A N/A 06-07 2% 69% 14% 74% 29% 53% Measurement The MPS Glossary Definition of CABS Classroom assessments aligned to the Milwaukee Public Schools’ Learning Targets; these assessments are developed, administered, and scored by teachers with the purpose of providing specific, meaningful, and timely feedback designed to improve student performance. CABS Development: A Collaborative Process Year 1 50 Assessment Pilot Leaders grades 3 - 5 studied MPS Targets and WI descriptors, wrote, discussed, and piloted grade level CABS for all mathematics content strands. Summer Committee Work 30 Leaders reviewed and aligned assessments for all grade levels with input from resources by NAEP, NCTM, as well as UWM mathematicians. CABS Development: The process continues Year 2 80 Assessment Leaders Gr. 2-7 continued developing and testing CABS. Summer Committee Work CABS were review by content strand with input from 5 UWM mathematicians. Year 3 K5-Gr1 CABS Process Features of the MPS model CABS Take a moment to look over the sample CABS. What do you notice? What questions do you have regarding the CABS? B. Number Operations and Relationships Grade 4 MP S Learning Targ et #1 (Grade 4) Use strategies fluently to make estimates, solve, and pose real-world problem s (e.g., single and multi -step) for all op erations, to compare and rename numbers, and to find factors and multiples. Descript ors Concepts: 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5 Computation: 10, 1 1, 13, 15, 16 MP S Learning Targ et #2 (Grade 4) Represent commonly used fractions (e.g., pictures , number lines ) and decimals (i.e., money) and use informal reasoning to rename, compare, add, and subtract them with and without context. Descript ors Concepts: 5 , 6, 7, ,8, 9 Computation: 12, 1 4, 15, 16 Wisconsin Sub-skill Descriptors (Beginning of Grade 5) Sub-skill B.a: Concepts 1) Recognize and apply place-value concepts to whole numbers less than 1,000,000. 2) Read, write, and represent numbers using words, numerals, pictures (e.g., base ten blocks ), number lines , arrays, expande d forms (243=200+40+3), and symbolic renaming e.g., 243=250 -7. 3) Compare and order numbers less than 10,000 represented in numbers, arrays, symbols (<, >, =) and words. 4) Use basic facts to determin e the first ten multiples of 2-10 and determine factors for numbers up to 100. Recognize the divisibil ity potential of numbers (divisors of 2, 5, 10, 25). Count using whol e numbers less than 10,000 and by any number 1-12 and Ōfriendly numbersÕ through 100 (ex . 20, 25, etc.) 5) Read, write, represent, count, compare, and order, and make change using a collection of coins and bills equal to an d less than $20.00. 6) Read, write, and identify equivalent fractions (1/4s, 1/2s, 1/8s, 1/10s, 1/16s). 7) Represent fractions (1/4s, 1/2s, 1/8s, 1/10s , 1/16s) using numbers , pictures (e.g., drawings or base ten blocks), and number lines. 8) Order and compare fractions (1/4s, 1/2s, 1/8s, 1/10s, 1/16s) represented numerically or as models (including parts o f a set and parts of a whole). 9) Rename improper fractions to mixe d numbers. Sub-skill B.b: Computation 10) Use all operations in everyday situations to solve single or multi -step word problems. 11) Solve th ree- and four-digit addition and subtraction with regrouping; multiplication of two-digit by one -digit numb ers; division with single -digit divisors and two -digit dividends and with two-step or mixed operation problems with single -digit numbers. 12) Add and subtract decimals in the context of money . 13) Solve problems using basic multiplication and division facts. 14) Add and subtract fractions with like denominators . 15) Estimate: multiplicatio n of two-digit by one -digit problems , addition and subtraction of decimals using money, and division in context. 16) Determine reasonable ness of answers. MMP Assessing the Assessment Guide Getting Started Clarification Statements for CABS: Round 1 - Align to MPS Targets and WI State Framework Descriptors Round 2 - Align to WI State Framework DOK Reflection and Comments Anticipating Student Responses and Implications Assessing The Assessment Round 1 Work with a partner to analyze questions from the 4th grade CABS. Using the MPS Target/Descriptor Worksheet align the questions to targets and descriptors. Record your thinking next to each question or next to each descriptor on the worksheet. What were your thoughts as you worked through this first step? WI State Assessment Framework DOK Level 1 - Recognizing and Recalling Level 2 - Using Fundamental Concepts and Procedures Level 3 - Concluding and Explaining Level 4 - Evaluating, Extending and Making Conclusions Definition of DOK : “Depth of Knowledge” (DOK) for each item is listed on reading and mathematics The Item Analysis reports. DOK is a measure of cognitive demand required to correctly answer the item. Source: WSAS online (TurnLeaf) reports under “More Info” Comparison of Thinking Levels MPS Levels of Thinking Wisconsin Stat e Assessment Framework Depths of Knowledge Level 4 Generate and Synthesize (Create, “What … if?”) Level 3 Apply and Analyze (Compare, Su mmarize) Level 2 Organize (Sort, Multiple steps) Level 1 Gather Inf ormation Level 1: Recognizing and (Recall, Memorize, State) Recalling Bloom’s Taxonomy (Revised 2001) Level 4: Evaluating , Extending and Making Connections Level 3: Concludin g and Explaining Level 6: Creating Level 5: Evaluating Level 2: Using Fundamental Concepts and Procedures Level 2: Understanding Level 4: Analyzing Level 3: Applying Level 1: Remembering Thinking Classification Skills (Mathematics) Level 4 Apply / Synthesize / Create / ŅWhat É if ?Ó Level 3 Analy ze / Compare / Summ arize Level 2 Organize / Sort / Multiple steps Level 1 Recall / Memorize / State Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 Item 5 Item 6 Item 7 Item 8 Item 9 #11 #11 The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an in itiative of the Milwaukee Partnership Academy (MPA), is supported wi th funding from th e National Science Foundation under Grant No. EHR-031489 8. Assessing the Assessment Round 2 Using the same set of CABS. Use the DOK worksheet along with the Thinking Classification Chart to record the Level of thinking for questions on the CABS. When finished, share your results with your table group, support your reasoning. Try to come to a consensus. Focus on problems: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #8, #12, #13, #15 Share Out Observations What were some of the insights gained as you worked through this process? What would be the benefit of teachers going through this process? In what way could this process be applied to other assessments? Insights from one of the Mathematicians - Dr. Kevin McLeod Reflections on building CABS and the process. Insights on working with the teachers. Thoughts for future work. Dustine Walker Math Teacher Leader O.W. Holmes Elementary School, MPS [email protected] CABS journey for O.W. Holmes Classroom focused - monitoring system 4-Day Constructed Response Process Student Work Samples Grade 3 Grade 7 Joanie Marchillo Math Teacher Leader Auer Avenue School, MPS [email protected] CABS journey for Auer Avenue School Student-Focused Monitoring System Distributed Leadership Support from Assessment Leaders • Kindergarten • Grade 4 Concluding Thoughts… Implementing CABS has been a process. Teachers have started to understand how to help build student understanding and improve classroom instruction. Your Thoughts… What are some of the ideas presented today that have struck you as you have engaged in this session on CABS?
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz