DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
MINUTES
METROPOLITAN PLANNING SUBCOMMITTEE
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA
NOVEMBER 13, 2012
These minutes are prepared in compliance with NRS 241.035. Text is in summarized rather than verbatim format. For complete contents, please refer to
meeting recordings on file at the Regional Transportation Commission.
THIS MEETING WAS PROPERLY NOTICED AND POSTED
IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS ON NOVEMBER 6, 2012
Clark County Government Center
500 S. Grand Central Pkwy.
Las Vegas, NV 89155
City of Henderson
Office of the City Clerk
240 Water Street
Henderson, NV 89015
CC Regional Justice Center
200 Lewis Ave.
Las Vegas, NV 89155
RTC
600 S. Grand Central Pkwy.
Las Vegas, NV 89106
RTC website
www.rtcsnv.com
CALL TO ORDER
Ms. Lebene Aidam-Ohene, Clark County Comprehensive Planning, Chair, called the meeting to order at
9:02 a.m. in Meeting Room 296 of the Regional Transportation Commission Administration Building.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Lebene Aidam-Ohene, Clark County Comprehensive Planning, Chair
Susan Danielewicz, City of Boulder City
Manuela Johnson, Bureau of Land Management
Bill Lewis, Veolia Transportation Services, Incorporated
Johanna Murphy, City of North Las Vegas (alternate)
Judy Peterson, Clark County School District (alternate)
Jason Rogers, City of Henderson
Mark Silverstein, Clark County Department of Aviation
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Allyn Keller, First Transit, Vice-Chair
Michael A. Dishari, Southern Nevada Water Authority
Flinn Fagg, Las Vegas
Melvin McCallum, Nevada Department of Transportation
Dennis Ransel, Clark County Department of Air Quality
Richard Secrist, City of Mesquite
RTC STAFF:
Martyn James, Director of Planning Services
Raymond Hess, Manager, Planning
Maria Rodriguez, Senior Transportation Planner
Mohammad Farhan, Principal Transportation Planner
Philip Banea, Principal Transportation Planner
Andrew Kjellman, Transportation Planner
Tammy McMahan, Management Analyst
INTERESTED PARTIES:
None
MPS
January 15, 2013
Item #1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Minutes-Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee
Meeting of November 13, 2012
Page 2 of 9
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
Comments:
No comments were made.
Motion:
No motion was necessary.
Vote/Summary:
No vote was taken.
Item:
1.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Meeting of October 9, 2012 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)
Comments:
No comments were made.
Motion:
Ms. Johanna Murphy, City of North Las Vegas, made a motion to approve.
Vote/Summary:
8 Ayes. 0 Nays. The motion carried.
Item:
2.
APPROVE AND ADOPT THE 2013-2035 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (FOR
POSSIBLE ACTION)
Comments:
Reading from the item’s background, Mr. Raymond Hess, Regional Transportation Commission of
Southern Nevada (RTC), set forth as follows: “The [RTC], as the designated Metropolitan Planning
Organization, adopted the 2009-2030 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) on November 13, 2008. The
RTC is required to update the RTP at least every four years and perform air quality conformity analysis to
meet the standards set by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The development of the
RTP and demonstration of air quality conformity will allow the RTC to secure federal funds for Southern
Nevada.
The RTC completed the draft 2013-2035 Regional Transportation Plan and the document was released for
a 45-day public comment period on October 12, 2012. Staff will report on the public outreach efforts
associated with the development of the RTP. Additionally, staff will report on any changes to the
document as a result of comments received during the public review period prior to the subcommittee
meeting. All comments received through the end of the comment period will be reported to the Executive
Advisory Committee on November 29, 2012.
Staff recommends approval of the 2013-2035 Regional Transportation Plan with the understanding that
minor changes may be made at the end of the comment period.”
Mr. Hess then directed the attention of the Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee (MPS) to a handout
[attached] entitled “Public Participation Summary.” He thanked his colleague Mr. Mohammad Farhan,
RTC, for developing the work. Mr. Hess noted that the summary outlined the RTP-related public outreach
events including the following: an online opinion survey, public information meetings held at libraries,
senior centers and community centers, public presentations at city councils, town boards and some of the
agency’s public meetings, and a public hearing to be held at the RTC Administrative Building.
Additionally, he noted that listings of the meetings and hearings were published in the Las Vegas ReviewJournal and Spanish-language and Chinese-language newspapers.
The Planning Manager then directed the Subcommittee’s attention to another handout [attached] entitled
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Minutes-Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee
Meeting of November 13, 2012
Page 3 of 9
“Responses to Comments” which listed RTP-related comments and the RTC’s responses. He noted that
12 comments had been received. He thanked Mr. Andrew Kjellman, RTC, for handling the replies. Mr.
Hess went on to explain that since the public comment period was ongoing and would not end until
Monday, November 26, 2012, further comments would be incorporated into a revised version of RTP
Appendix 2 “Public Participation Plan.” This information would be presented to the Executive Advisory
Committee (EAC) and the Transportation Access Advisory Committee. He invited MPS members and
alternates to attend the EAC meeting if they wished to provide input on the finalized version. He added
that agency personnel would disseminate, via email, the finalized version of the public comment and
responses to the MPS.
Next, Mr. Hess pointed out two changes to RTP projects of regional significance which affected the air
quality conformity model. He noted that the city of Las Vegas (Las Vegas) had changed the scope of a
Rainbow Boulevard project from a four-lane general purpose roadway to a three-lane general-purpose
roadway with a fourth lane dedicated for transit and bicycle usage. The Planning Manager stated that this
modification was already reflected in the RTP and TIP but not in the air quality conformity model
because the requested change to the project was received after the model run was complete. Secondly, Mr.
Hess stated that the inclusion of a proposed Flamingo Road Bus Rapid Transit service also had to be
updated in the air quality conformity model.
Mr. Jason Rogers, City of Henderson, asked if any other municipalities and/or Clark County had made
any changes of scope to regionally significant projects like that requested by Las Vegas. Mr. Hess set
forth that Clark County had requested to extend the parameters of a Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality (CMAQ) project. He mentioned that RTC personnel would have to determine if additional
information would be required for the project to still fit the CMAQ eligibility criteria with this proposed
change. He also noted that the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) personnel had reviewed the
project list and had some questions. RTC and Transportation Department staff members would work
together on this matter and also determine if the RTP project list was in line with the Statewide
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Also, NDOT had made minor changes involving
terminology regarding Project Neon.
Mr. Rogers understood that agency personnel would be reaching out to staff members of the Southern
Nevada public works departments. Mr. Martyn James, RTC, indicated that this had been done and
comments from these departments were expected the week of November 11, 2012. Furthermore, he
conveyed that RTC personnel had not been made aware by public works department staff members of any
changes to regionally significant project. He emphasized that if changes to regionally significant projects
were not received in a timely manner, this would present a problematic situation requiring another run of
the air quality conformity model.
Reviewing the “Response to Comments” handout, Mr. Bill Lewis, Veolia Transportation Services,
Incorporated, was concerned about the comment related to the lack of RTC transit at McCarran
International Airport (McCarran Airport). He thought the increased availability of transit at the airport
would facilitate connectivity and minimize traffic congestion throughout the Las Vegas Valley. He
wondered if the agency and the airport had some sort of difficulties in their working relationship. Mr.
Lewis strongly encouraged the agency to coordinate with airport staff members regarding public outreach
about public transportation to and from the airport, ticket vending machines and other measures to ensure
interested persons were aware of transit options. Mr. James responded that this matter was indeed one of
ongoing negotiations with the airport. He did state that the RTC hoped that more opportunities for public
transportation at the facility would become available. He added that access arrangements at an airport can
be dictated by the physical layout of the facility and what area the airport could provide for transit
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Minutes-Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee
Meeting of November 13, 2012
Page 4 of 9
vehicles.
Mr. Mark Silverstein, Clark County Department of Aviation, confirmed that discussions were ongoing.
He noted that Route 109 did provide service to McCarran Airport, but he would bring matter to the
attention of airport management. Both Mr. Silverstein and Mr. James commented that the Maryland
Parkways Alternative Analysis study would provide another opportunity to talk about this matter.
The MPS did not make further comments or pose any additional questions.
Mr. Hess then stated that agency personnel were requesting a recommendation to adopt and approve
2013-2035 Regional Transportation Plan with the understanding that additional minor changes may have
to be made and incorporated into the work. He reiterated that the MPS would be provided with the
finalized version of the comments and responses. Additionally, Mr. James stated that any MPS member
could make further comments during the ongoing public comment period which did not end until
November 26, 2012. He repeated that the finalized version would be disseminated, via email, to the
group.
Mr. Rogers asked if the document could be placed in the FTP server. Mr. James and Ms. Tammy
McMahan, RTC, indicated that the agency should be able to provide the information through the server.
Mr. Silverstein asked that RTC staff members send notification of the upcoming EAC November 2012
meeting. Ms. McMahan responded that she would do so.
Motion:
Ms. Johanna Murphy, City of North Las Vegas, made a motion to follow staff’s recommendation to adopt
and approve the 2013-2035 Regional Transportation Plan with the understanding that additional minor
changes may have to be made and incorporated into the work.
Vote/Summary:
8 Ayes. 0 Nays. The motion carried.
Item:
3.
APPROVE AND ADOPT THE 2013-2016 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
(FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)
Comments:
Mr. Raymond Hess, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), explained that the
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) comprised the first four years (2013 through 2016) of the
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). He stated that approval of the 2013-2016 TIP would secure federal
authorization for the expenditure of funds on identified projects. He reminded the Metropolitan Planning
Subcommittee (MPS) that Metropolitan Planning Organization – Planning department staff members had
been regularly reporting on the TIP during the 2012 MPS meetings.
Mr. Hess went on to reference two handouts, one entitled “Public Participation Process Summary” and the
other entitled “Response to Comments.” He noted that these were the same comments mentioned during
the discussion related to Item #2 and they applied to the TIP as well.
Referring to the item’s backup, page T1-28, which listed some City of Henderson projects, Mr. Jason
Rogers, City of Henderson, was concerned that there was no identification of project phase for some of
the projects. Mr. Martyn James, RTC, believed the omission of descriptions for certain projects was an
oversight. He indicated that this would be corrected.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Minutes-Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee
Meeting of November 13, 2012
Page 5 of 9
As the discussion drew to a close, Mr. Hess conveyed that the RTC was requesting a recommendation to
adopt and approve then 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program with the understanding that
additional minor changes may have to be made and incorporated into the work.
Motion:
Ms. Johanna Murphy, City of North Las Vegas, made a motion to follow staff’s recommendation to adopt
and approve the 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program with the understanding that additional
minor changes may have to be made and incorporated into the work.
Vote/Summary:
8 Ayes. 0 Nays. The motion carried.
Item:
4.
APPROVE AND ADOPT THE 2013 TRANSIT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS (FOR POSSIBLE
ACTION)
Comments:
Referring to the item’s background, Mr. Raymond Hess, Regional Transportation Commission of
Southern Nevada (RTC), stated that the 2013 Transit Program of Projects was a subset of the Regional
Transportation Plan. He mentioned that the “Response to Comments” handout did include feedback about
transit.
Mr. Hess then stated that agency personnel were requesting a recommendation to adopt and approve the
2013 Transit Program of Projects with the understanding that additional minor changes may have to be
made and incorporated into the work.
Motion:
Ms. Johanna Murphy, City of North Las Vegas, made a motion to follow staff’s recommendation to adopt
and approve the 2013 Transit Program of Projects with the understanding that additional minor changes
may have to be made and incorporated into the work.
Vote/Summary:
8 Ayes. 0 Nays. The motion carried.
Item:
5.
RECEIVE A REPORT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF “COMPLETE STREETS FOR LIVABLE
COMMUNITIES: A DESIGN MANUAL” (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)
Comments:
Reading from the item’s background, Mr. Martyn James, Regional Transportation Commission of
Southern Nevada (RTC), set forth as follows: “The [RTC] approved the Complete Streets Study Report
and adopted the regional Complete Streets Policies on June 14, 2012. The RTC has now developed
“Complete Streets for Livable Communities: A DESIGN MANUAL,” which contains guidance and
design concepts which can be implemented by the RTC and local agencies as these entities develop
complete streets.
The Design Manual is based on a similar document prepared for Los Angeles County and has been
customized for the circumstances of the Las Vegas Valley with the aid of a grant from the Centers for
Disease Control (CDC) through the Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD).
By adopting the Design Manual the RTC is indicating the [agency’s] support for the implementation of
these concepts and signaling a willingness to consider funding and staff support, while respecting the
right of individual local public agencies, as well as the development community in the region, to decide
where and how is it appropriate to implement the guidance and design concepts from the Manual.”
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Minutes-Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee
Meeting of November 13, 2012
Page 6 of 9
Mr. Mike Hand, RTC, then addressed the Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee (MPS). He detailed that
the Complete Streets Working Group had engaged in productive, thoughtful discussions as the Design
Manual was developed. However, he shared that there had been disagreements with the Clark County Fire
Department regarding the turning radii for fire trucks. He acknowledged that consensus may not be met
on this particular issue. With this in mind, he emphasized that the Design Manual was not to be seen as a
rule book, but instead as a concepts guide. He noted that agency personnel fully realized that the RTC
could not dictate a certain kind of Complete Streets implementation and municipalities and Clark County
would be following the design principles as their entity staff members saw fit. Mr. Hand noted that he
would be providing a Complete Streets Design Manual PowerPoint presentation at the Executive
Advisory Committee November 29, 2012 meeting. He invited the MPS to attend that meeting.
Mr. Jason Rogers, City of Henderson, lauded Mr. Hand and his staff for their leadership on this major
undertaking. He noted that they had ensured that a diverse group of shareholders had been involved.
Motion:
No motion was necessary.
Vote/Summary:
No vote was taken.
Item:
6.
RECEIVE A REPORT ON THE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLANNING STUDIES IN
THE FISCAL YEAR 2013 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM AND RECOMMEND
PARTICIPANTS FOR UPCOMING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP MEETINGS (FOR
POSSIBLE ACTION)
Comments:
Reading from the item’s background, Ms. Maria Rodriguez, Regional Transportation Commission of
Southern Nevada (RTC), set forth as follows: “The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern
Nevada (RTC), in support of more livable communities, will begin several bicycle and pedestrian
planning studies funded under the Fiscal Year 2013 Unified Planning Work Program. The main goal of
the studies is to improve bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure throughout Southern Nevada.
Staff will make a brief presentation on the upcoming planning studies. The RTC asks the Metropolitan
Planning Subcommittee to discuss and recommend participants for technical working group meetings that
will take place for these studies.”
Ms. Rodriguez stated that the agency would be undertaking more multimodal studies in a bid to make
Southern Nevada a more “walkable” and bike-friendly place. She added that these studies would include
recommendations to enhance safety for pedestrians and bicyclists as well. The Senior Transportation
Planner highlighted three studies which would be carried out in 2013. First, she addressed the Regional
Bicycle Network Gap Analyses. She stated that the first such analysis had been done in 1990 and had
been conducted frequently since. She stated that this evaluation would determine where the network
needed to connect so people could ride their bicycles to and from desired destinations. Ms. Rodriguez
stated that a consultant would be analyzing the network to formulate a list of recommendations. Second,
the Senior Transportation Planner stated that a Pedestrian Infrastructure Inventory and Analysis would be
undertaken. She noted that since many pedestrian fatalities had occurred over the last year, RTC staff
members and personnel with Clark County and the Southern Nevada municipalities had discussed how to
protect pedestrians. Some of the matters that would be addressed would include sidewalks or the lack
thereof and pedestrian signage and signals. Third, Ms. Rodriguez stated that the RTC would be gathering
information in order to make investments in multimodal facilities. This data would help in the
identification and prioritization of needs.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Minutes-Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee
Meeting of November 13, 2012
Page 7 of 9
Ms. Rodriguez asked that the Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee (MPS) determine if someone
employed with the entities they represent could serve on technical working group meetings for these
studies. She estimated that participation in these studies would take approximately one year of
commitment. She and Mr. Martyn James, RTC, indicated that either of them could be contacted regarding
this matter.
Mr. James characterized the bicycle and pedestrian planning studies as very important. He emphasized
that it would be beneficial to include not only staff members from the Southern Nevada public works
departments, but also bicycle and safety advocates and other relevant stakeholders.
Ms. Johanna Murphy, City of North Las Vegas, asked if RTC staff members could email MPS to remind
the group to suggest colleagues for the working groups. Ms. Rodriguez indicated that she would do so.
Motion:
No motion was necessary.
Vote/Summary:
No action was taken.
Item:
7.
CONSIDER THE FUTURE SCHEDULE FOR SUBCOMMITTEE MEETINGS AND DIRECT
STAFF ACCORDINGLY (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)
Comments:
Reading from the item’s background, Mr. Martyn James, Regional Transportation Commission of
Southern Nevada (RTC), set forth as follows: “Under the Policies and Procedures of the [RTC], the
Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee (MPS) meets not less than once every two months to assist the
Executive Advisory Committee (EAC) in the formulation of recommendations to the RTC with regard to
planning and programming issues and other items as requested by RTC or EAC.
At the June 2012 meeting of the Subcommittee, the members resolved to meet monthly for the remainder
of the year to consider issues related to the development of the Regional Transportation Plan [RTP]. Work
on the Regional Transportation Plan is nearing completion and it is appropriate to consider the frequency
of MPS meetings over the coming months.
Staff will outline some of the topics that are expected to come before the EAC and RTC in 2013 as well
as other factors that may influence the frequency of MPS meetings.”
Mr. James shared that in 2013 a number of matters would be brought before the MPS including the final
version of the Regional Transportation Plan, the interpretation of the “Moving Ahead for Progress in the
21st Century” (MAP-21) legislation, the Metropolitan Planning Organization Planning (MPO)
Department’s planning process, updates to the bicycle and pedestrian plan, the proposed Southern Nevada
Transportation Safety Plan, reports on various projects and studies including Complete Streets and the
Community Mobility Study. In light of these matters, Mr. James believed that scheduling a monthly
meeting may be helpful to the group. He noted that if there were not enough items for a full agenda, a
meeting could be canceled. He followed by stating that the membership may find bi-monthly meetings
more suitable though.
Ms. Susan Danielewicz, City of Boulder City, expressed that due to the distance of travel to the RTC
Administrative Building, it would be difficult for her to make monthly meetings. Her preference was for
six meetings throughout 2013. However, she felt that since not all of the MPS members were present, the
item should be brought before the group again.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Minutes-Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee
Meeting of November 13, 2012
Page 8 of 9
Chair Lebene Aidam-Ohene, Clark County Comprehensive Planning, concurred with Ms. Danielewicz.
She noted that many MPS members had so many commitments that six meetings in 2013 might work
best. Furthermore, Chair Aidam-Ohene agreed with Ms. Danielewicz that it would be prudent to get input
from the other members who were unable to attend.
Mr. Bill Lewis, Veolia Transportation Services, Incorporated, agreed with both Ms. Danielewicz and
Chair Aidam-Ohene. He shared that he experienced a time conflict with the MPS meeting and another
critically important meeting. He expressed that having the meetings six times a year, every other month,
would better accommodate his schedule.
Ms. Manuela Johnson, Bureau of Land Management, Ms. Johanna Murphy, City of North Las Vegas, Ms.
Judy Peterson, Clark County School District, Mr. Jason Rogers, City of Henderson, and Mr. Mark
Silverstein, Clark County Department of Aviation, all stated that they were willing to have either monthly
or bi-monthly meetings. Mr. Silverstein wondered if the meetings could be planned monthly and members
could call in from Boulder City, Nevada and Mesquite, Nevada.
Mr. James stated that the item would be brought back before the Subcommittee at the group’s next
meeting.
Mr. James went on to thank the MPS for attending monthly meetings in 2012 to facilitate the
development of the RTP.
Lastly, Mr. James announced that MPO-Planning believed that there would not be enough items for a full
December 2012 agenda. As such, staff members suggested canceling that meeting. The MPS did not
object.
Motion:
Per the consensus of the Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee, this item was held.
Vote/Summary:
No vote was taken.
Item:
7.
RECEIVE REGIONAL STAFF UPDATES
Comments:
Ms. Manuela Johnson, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), announced that BLM would be holding a
competitive land sale in January 2013. The parcel was located in the area of Polaris Avenue. She noted
that the land was under Clark County’s jurisdiction.
Chair Lebene Aidam-Ohene, Clark County Comprehensive Planning, Ms. Susan Danielewicz, City of
Boulder City, Mr. Bill Lewis, Veolia Transportation Services, Incorporated, Ms. Johanna Murphy, City of
North Las Vegas, Ms. Judy Peterson, Clark County School District, Mr. Jason Rogers, City of Henderson,
and Mr. Mark Silverstein, Clark County Department of Aviation had no items to report.
Motion:
No motion was necessary.
Vote/Summary:
No vote was taken.
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
Comments:
No comments were made.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Minutes-Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee
Meeting of November 13, 2012
Page 9 of 9
Motion:
No motion was necessary.
Vote/Summary:
No vote was taken.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:15 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Tammy McMahan, Recording Secretary
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
MPS
Item #2
November 13, 2012 Handout
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Regional Transportation Plan Survey 2013-2035
1. What are the top priorities you believe should be addressed in the future? Please rank
the following goals in order of importance.
High
Medium
Low
Priority
Priority
Priority
49.7% (233)
35.8% (168)
13.2% (62)
1.3% (6)
1.00
469
51.6% (242)
30.1% (141)
17.3% (81)
1.1% (5)
1.00
469
56.9% (267)
33.5% (157)
8.3% (39)
1.3% (6)
1.00
469
40.5% (190)
39.0% (183)
18.3% (86)
2.1% (10)
1.00
469
44.6% (209)
38.4% (180)
14.1% (66)
3.0% (14)
1.00
469
22.2% (104)
41.4% (194)
33.3% (156)
3.2% (15)
1.00
469
No Opinion
Rating
Response
Average
Count
Improve Air Quality and
Environmental Sustainability Promote strategies that reduce
travel times at rush hour traffic,
that support alternative fuel and
vehicle usage, and that increase
carpooling.
Integrate Transportation Options Promote strategies that increase
bicycle, pedestrian, and transit
travel.
Enhance Efficiency of Existing
Transportation Facilities - Promote
strategies that improve traffic
signal timing, that provide
information on travel conditions,
and that support the overall
performance of roadway network.
Improve Access to Mass Transit
Facilities and Services - Promote
strategies that improve transit
accessibility for disabled, elderly,
and low-income persons.
Secure Funding for the Existing and
Future Transportation Systems Promote strategies that increase
capacity for less cost, that protect
right-of-way, and that
improve/protect revenue sources.
Enhance Public Awareness /
Support for the RTC - Promote
strategies that encourage education
of transportation issues and that
provide public input opportunities
for disabled, low-income, and
1 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
minority persons.
Improve Transportation Safety Promote strategies that reduce
injuries and fatalities on the
47.1% (221)
35.6% (167)
16.0% (75)
1.3% (6)
1.00
469
22.4% (105)
40.3% (189)
33.7% (158)
3.6% (17)
1.00
469
23.0% (108)
35.8% (168)
35.6% (167)
5.5% (26)
1.00
469
answered question
469
skipped question
1
roadway network.
Improve Transportation Security Promote strategies that prepare the
roadway network from emergencies
resulting from security threats and
natural disasters.
Support Efficient Freight Movement
- Promote strategies that improve
freight flow through roadways, rail
corridors, and airports.
2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the
needs of the transportation network for the next 20+ years.
Response
Count
188
2 of 77
answered question
188
skipped question
282
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
3. In what city do you live?
Response
Response
Percent
Count
Las Vegas
55.0%
258
Henderson
38.6%
181
North Las Vegas
4.5%
21
Boulder City
1.1%
5
Laughlin
0.6%
3
Mesquite
0.4%
2
Other (please specify)
20
answered question
469
skipped question
1
Response
Response
Percent
Count
4. How old are you?
10-20
1.3%
6
21-40
29.0%
136
41-60
56.3%
264
Over 61
14.5%
68
answered question
469
skipped question
1
3 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
Response
Count
469
answered question
469
skipped question
1
6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
Response
Count
400
answered question
400
skipped question
70
Response
Response
Percent
Count
7. How long have you lived in Southern Nevada?
Less than 5 years
6.0%
28
5-10 years
17.1%
80
11-20 years
30.1%
141
20 or more years
47.3%
222
answered question
469
skipped question
1
4 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
8. OPTIONAL: If you would like to receive more information about the Regional
Transportation Plan, please provide us with your contact information so we can send you
further details.
Name:
Affiliation (if relevant):
Response
Response
Percent
Count
96.0%
96
35.0%
35
100.0%
100
answered question
100
skipped question
370
Phone number and/or email
address:
5 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
9. How did you find out about this survey? Please check more than one if needed.
Response
Response
Percent
Count
Newspaper
7.0%
33
Television
0.6%
3
Radio
0.2%
1
Public Offices (RTC, libraries, etc.)
16.0%
75
Posters, fliers or brochures
0.6%
3
Social networking sites
14.5%
68
Word of mouth
13.0%
61
Other (please specify below)
51.2%
240
Other (please specify)
6 of 77
226
answered question
469
skipped question
1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
7 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the needs of the
transportation network for the next 20+ years.
1
The construction on S Valley view From 95 to Spring Mountain. I do not know
what your planners do but they certainly do not have done the public any good
with the construction on Valley VIew. First the construction that should have
taken no more than a few months is draggin on for over a year. To boot who
ever figured out that you should use two and a half lanes one direction and one
and three quarters in the opposite direction had to have his head someplace
rather where it should have been. You are narrowing the road south so much if
a car and a truck or two trucks try to go side by side one is going to have go on
the sidewalk or they cannot go side by side. For Christ sake do the math.
Totally insane. Your construction workers did not even work on the job for
almost three months and then when they finally did work it's only a few hours a
week. This project is a total waste of taxpayers money and is taking a five lane
street and making it a 31/2 disaster. Please, it would be nice if a good
explanation to the residents on this disaster would be appreciated. I have talked
to several people and they just shake their heads in disbelief as I'm doing. In the
Navy we called this a CF.
Sep 14, 2012 9:19 PM
2
For the bus stops why not install the same type of pillars that are in front of 7/11
or something similar like the concrete balls in front of TARGET. We wouldn't
need that many just enough spaced out to fit the width of a vehicle. Many have
been successful you can watch on YouTube.
Sep 13, 2012 5:21 PM
3
Purchase the Monorail
Sep 13, 2012 10:15 AM
4
Shorter signal waits. Better signal timing north and south.
Sep 13, 2012 6:16 AM
5
There needs bus routes on Buffalo Dr, Durango Dr, and Fort Apache rd.
Sep 13, 2012 5:23 AM
6
Truthfully, there is no solution to the congestion on the highways/interstates. If
employment is low here in Las Vegas NV now, and traffic is outrageous, what is
it going to be when full employment is achieved once again? It will be like Los
Angeles traffic for sure.
Sep 12, 2012 5:30 PM
7
Please re time the lights,like boulder highway and Warm Springs
Sep 12, 2012 4:50 PM
8
All of the above seem like top priorities so it is difficult to rank them in this way
Sep 12, 2012 1:22 PM
9
replace the old 60 foot busses on tropican ave. thank you
Sep 12, 2012 11:09 AM
10
Promote strategies that increase bicycle/bus travel.
Sep 12, 2012 9:55 AM
11
Two bus routes come within 1 mile of the Heritage Park Senior Facility, Aquatic
Facility and Park. I work at the Senior Facility and continualy recieve complaints
of no buss service. Approximatly 800 seniors use the facility per day. The
location of the stops requires a long walk for these seniors. The seniors who are
healthy enough to walk that distance do not come when the weather is hot
because of the walk. There are pull outs to facilitate stops on both Burkholder
and Race Track. With the two facilities open and the opening of the park in
general I would think it worth relooking at the posibility of having at least one of
the routes stopping comming to the Park. I regularly see one of our patrons who
rides the bus and then walks in the area of Boulder highway and Desert Inn
where she lives. She comes all the way to Henderson because we have a
Sep 12, 2012 5:59 AM
8 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the needs of the
transportation network for the next 20+ years.
nutrition program.
12
Bus drivers need to learn how to be customer friendly. I've witnesses how bus
drivers mistreat families trying to catch a bus in the summer heat and do not
allow them on the bus.
Sep 11, 2012 6:54 PM
13
We need a reliable faster transit system
Sep 11, 2012 4:45 PM
14
Educating citizens on what RTC does to reduce crime on buses/public transport,
etc.
Sep 11, 2012 2:06 PM
15
Increase I-15 lanes to S California and Utah. Creating a super highway will bring
more jobs to our community. Forget about the train to nowhere. It is all about the
freeway system.
Sep 11, 2012 12:03 PM
16
Not to raise the cost of taking the bus every couple of years. Or soon it will cost
more to ride the bus than it is to drive a car.
Sep 11, 2012 10:12 AM
17
Tailor size and type of public transportation vehicles to actual utilization by route.
Sep 11, 2012 9:53 AM
18
Complete streets, safe bike lanes and outreach to the community on cyclist
safety, wider sidewalks separated from the street by trees, etc. Safer crosswalks.
Sep 11, 2012 9:48 AM
19
Get the bicyles off the roads!!
Sep 11, 2012 8:44 AM
20
Need Routes in Providence Community-Currently No Services Available
Sep 11, 2012 8:38 AM
21
Need more bicycle/pedestrian trails that are separated from the roads.
Sep 11, 2012 6:48 AM
22
All are important and each should be considered at all times
Sep 9, 2012 1:01 PM
23
Establish light rail system from Henderson to downtown and a additional access
from the north using existing rail lines. If you create the system, people will use it
and adjust their lives accordingly. This could greatly reduce the volume of cars
on the road, and rail is one of the most efficent means to move people and
goods per gallon of fuel.
Sep 8, 2012 9:00 AM
24
More bicycle lanes
Sep 8, 2012 1:53 AM
25
I would especially like to see bus frequency increased throughout the system
and the continued focus on improving bicycle routes.
Sep 7, 2012 10:06 PM
26
Bike lanes, pedestrian & cyclist safety, complete streets. Make alternative
transportation more attractive to the public.
Sep 7, 2012 3:36 PM
27
More buses, frequency, maintenance.
Sep 7, 2012 1:01 PM
28
Improve transit so that all areas of the city have convenient public transit. I live
in Green Velley and the nearest bus is two miles from where I live. And even if I
could get there,the bus routes are so convoluted that it takes hours to travel just
a few miles from home.
Sep 7, 2012 11:38 AM
29
Bicycles! Bicycles! Bicycles!
Sep 7, 2012 7:25 AM
9 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the needs of the
transportation network for the next 20+ years.
30
Simply if you add routes the people will have them to use. Be pro-active not just
re-active.
Sep 6, 2012 5:23 PM
31
need to have more opportunities for handicapped riders
Sep 6, 2012 5:13 PM
32
after visiting cities on the east coast of US, a system like Metro in DC would be
wonderful and something to link up SoCal to LV is still needed
Sep 6, 2012 10:43 AM
33
Strive to achieve the quiet and comfort of rail...the bus rides are noisy.
Installation of web based system to determine where one's bus is currently to
determine whether on-time or late at un-manned stops.
ides are noisy and
not that comfortable. Also some web-based system to determine
Sep 6, 2012 10:20 AM
34
More bike lanes are needed
Sep 6, 2012 8:15 AM
35
Promote strategies that encourage pedestrian-friendly hubs and destinations.
Partner with malls, theaters, The Smith Center, Strip and Downtown Casinos show your bus card, get into Springs Preserve for Free on Saturdays, Skip the
Walk, Bus to Target Tuesdays // Take the Bus to School campaigns (do you
have any idea HOW MANY kids live with divorced parents in two school zones,
and therefore don't have transportation to school 1/2 the time??? There are
THOUSANDS of us - and it means LOTS of extra road time. /// I don't want to
reach a destination and be STRANDED, yet that is my perception of bus travel.
Appeal to the young and CIVILIZED. Promote bus travel for high school and
college aged kids. Communicate the safety of putting a 17 yo on the bus rather
than behind a wheel, make riding the bus cool, rather than a symbol of poverty.
Public perception is the RTC's #2 enemy imho, after funding, of course! Good
luck!!!! :D
Sep 6, 2012 8:00 AM
36
Regional transportatin needs to be more RELIABLE, more accessable, and
cover more of the area.
Sep 6, 2012 6:55 AM
37
Cyclist/Bike Commuter
Sep 6, 2012 5:15 AM
38
More express routes, and more direct routes.
Sep 6, 2012 12:30 AM
39
Better integrate the transportation network and link the LV Monorail from the
airport to downtown LV.
Sep 5, 2012 11:10 PM
40
Plan for future boom in area
Sep 5, 2012 10:06 PM
41
I think we should have some sort of subway or above ground transit system that
is more efficient than traditional busing in terms of sustainability but also in terms
of access to different parts of town with regular and frequent stops.
Sep 5, 2012 9:45 PM
42
Mass TRansit! Railroad transportation to Los Angeles.
Sep 5, 2012 7:51 PM
43
expand routes beyond centinnel hills station
Sep 5, 2012 7:33 PM
44
remove the road cones at the end of the day
Sep 5, 2012 6:50 PM
45
Room for growth, better traffic light management, improved plans for bicycle
commuting.
Sep 5, 2012 5:40 PM
10 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the needs of the
transportation network for the next 20+ years.
46
build a subway or rail from boulder city to summerlin, now
Sep 5, 2012 4:49 PM
47
Extend the Monorail to the Airport, Downtown, The M, Downtown Henderson,
Nellis, Summerlin.
Sep 5, 2012 4:17 PM
48
Strategies are needed to encourage people to car pool. Increasing the capacity
of highways will not encourage the use of mass transit.
Sep 5, 2012 2:51 PM
49
South Casino Drive from Harrah's to Needles Hwy is falling into the Colorado
River... Fix it.
Sep 5, 2012 2:48 PM
50
We should support green technology that would cause less pollution and create
more local jobs. Las Vegas has a lot of potential for solar, geothermal, wind.
Sep 5, 2012 1:58 PM
51
Provide more air condition vehicles and more timely schedules, I drove the
transit system here for 3 yrs. and 23yrs prior, this si one of the worst transit
systems I've seen for the amount of people in las vegas.
Sep 5, 2012 1:27 PM
52
We need mass transit insfrastructure, Prefferably light rail/Metro
Sep 5, 2012 1:08 PM
53
Note: All of the above are great initiatives and should all be priorities, but I tried
to NOT rank them all as High Priority because you can't focus on everything at
once!
Sep 5, 2012 12:54 PM
54
Las Vegas has a huge cycling community. We need Bike Lanes and transit
options that do not leave out cyclists.
Sep 5, 2012 12:52 PM
55
Transportation must be valley wide with use of a combination of rail (inner city
train) and busses. Really like to see commuter rail system around the valley.
Vegas is a metro city now.
Sep 5, 2012 12:45 PM
56
Expand RTC westward to include Buffalo, Durango, and especially Ft ApacheRampart.
Sep 5, 2012 12:24 PM
57
Please reduce strip congestion by extending the monorail to the airport.
Sep 5, 2012 12:09 PM
58
rail system
Sep 5, 2012 12:07 PM
59
Minimizing fuel expenditures and increased safety for all users should be your
motto.shoudl
Sep 5, 2012 11:54 AM
60
Integrate existing rail, bus, cycling to reduce the need for driving.
Sep 5, 2012 11:05 AM
61
Funding reqiurements for the Complete Streets Initiative must receive the
highest priority!
Sep 5, 2012 11:03 AM
62
I am interested in adt'l info and the process - don't live in RTC region.
Sep 5, 2012 10:11 AM
63
Increase Public Transportation to serve a larger area and more connecting
routes of the valley
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
64
I support a strategic, prioritized approach that allocates investment to local and
statewide preservation, safety and capital improvements
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
11 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the needs of the
transportation network for the next 20+ years.
65
commuter rail and high-speed rail should be top priority
Sep 5, 2012 10:08 AM
66
explore legality of vehicle taxation based on miles travelled
Sep 5, 2012 10:07 AM
67
Need to have bike racks at every major bus stop!! For safely locking your bikes!!
Sep 5, 2012 10:03 AM
68
Low priority items should be enforced by police departments, more tickets with
full fines paid. Security is Homeland Security and TSA departments. Moped
riders - if they are in roadway they should follow laws, i.e. helmets, registration,
and license!
Sep 5, 2012 10:03 AM
69
add commuter buses to downtown, like Westcliff Express
Sep 5, 2012 9:59 AM
70
Improve biking and pedestrian networks!!! No more wasteful spending on
vehicles!
Sep 5, 2012 9:53 AM
71
Do not use Negative inventives to promote one mode over another.
Sep 5, 2012 9:47 AM
72
It seems historically the RTC has focused on providing transit opportunities for
those people who don't have other means of travel. I would like to see more
emphasis put into providing mass transit opportunities for those of us who would
like to get away from having to drive a car everywhere we go. I would love to
ride the bus to work but it isn't feasible for me to take three buses and an hour
and a half to travel 5 miles to work.
Sep 5, 2012 9:47 AM
73
no more people in valley.
Sep 5, 2012 9:42 AM
74
Placing bus stops a greater distance from the left traveling turns lanes PLEASE!!
Sep 4, 2012 5:25 PM
75
Transportation needs to be improved wtih offer to teh mini-fest. a lot of gas
wasterd b/c of rowding passengers. also, many drivers could of think they are
??? do not know how to drive from point a to b, wasting fuel and 25 minute pickup window. pick up and drop off time must be improved. pick up and drop off at
sams town because of the 25 minute window is ridiculous
Sep 4, 2012 5:23 PM
76
make bus stops have own pull off areas!!!
Sep 4, 2012 5:18 PM
77
While I realize that any city is a dynamic, living entitity, the constant roadwork,
construction, lane changes, and speedzone changes have grown beyond
tiresome to downright annoying. I would love to be able to commute within my
neighborhood and across the Valley without driving through multiple construction
zones.
Sep 4, 2012 4:47 PM
78
Less mass transit. The western US is too spread out to efficiently have a mass
transit system that does not lose and waste money.
Sep 4, 2012 4:17 PM
79
Above Ground Light Rail System. Additional bike lanes that are respected by
motorists. Tough laws against not sharing the road with bicyclists and
pedestrians. Shaded and cooled bus stops. More frequent bus service and
stops. Expanded area of service in less time (takes too long to get from point A
to point B). We need a light rail system and also a quick train to L.A.
Sep 4, 2012 3:41 PM
80
We need to integrate more people-friendly public transit system where the roads
Sep 4, 2012 3:17 PM
12 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the needs of the
transportation network for the next 20+ years.
are safer for cars, cyclists and pedestrians. Would like to see more designated
cycle lane. It'll make Vegas safer and Earth friendlier too!
81
Provide more bike lanes throughout Las Vegas and Henderson.
Sep 4, 2012 2:48 PM
82
Additional roadway safety development to promote bicycle usage.
Sep 4, 2012 1:56 PM
83
More bicycle lanes.
Sep 4, 2012 1:32 PM
84
The Vegas Valley really needs a train system like other major metropolitan
areas.
Sep 4, 2012 12:37 PM
85
More efficient flow of traffic is a must
Sep 4, 2012 12:32 PM
86
As a citizen I have no way of providing imput about things happening in and
around town.
Sep 4, 2012 12:23 PM
87
Traffice Signals in Henderson need to be better timed. They are very
inconsistant. I do like the new flashing yellow turn signal, that was a great idea!
Sep 4, 2012 12:14 PM
88
Crack down on jay walkers. Have crosswalks close to bus stops. Make it easier
for people who have never used public transportation. Fix long lights such as the
exit to valley view from 95 southbound and the one at Polaris and twain is really
bad
Sep 4, 2012 11:38 AM
89
I think bus service needs to be more reliable (on-time), have shorter wait times
for buses, and better routes to get more people to use the system.
Sep 4, 2012 11:22 AM
90
The I-95 and I-215 interchange heading west on 215 from southbound 95 is
awful. The Auto Show Drive on-ramp is too close to the 215 onramp and causes
unsafe conditions. Hopefully, there is a way to remedy this in the future.
Sep 4, 2012 11:21 AM
91
I believe mass transit in LV is difficult to make effective due to the population per
square mile. The spread out area presents unique challenge to mass transit.
Sep 4, 2012 11:20 AM
92
Provide a vehicle bridge over C-1 channel at Newport Drive in Henderson (With
the construction of Heritage Park and the increased traffic it will bring this needs
to be a priority). Also provide a east side belt-way (complete the 215 loop) - or at
least a rural highway alternative to access I-15 going North from Henderson
(behind Frenchman Mtn). Also a vehicle bridge across the Las Vegas Wash in
Henderson would be great. It would be nice to quickly access the Eastern Side
of Las Vegas from SE Henderson across the wash (perhap near the Weston
Hills housing development) - this section of Henderson is currently being
prepared for future development an additional way to get across the Las Vegas
Wash further east would improve connectivity.(These are a few ideas I have had
for a number of years - and would like an opportunity to provide input on this
effort if possible). Thanks.
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
93
inner city rail system & Hi speed rail system
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
94
Additional areas where the busses could pull up out of the travel lane would
assist in better traffic flow
Sep 4, 2012 10:26 AM
13 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the needs of the
transportation network for the next 20+ years.
95
More pedestrian bridges are needed and access highways like the DI arterial.
Sep 4, 2012 10:24 AM
96
Create a light rail system so that people from the suburbs can commute into
town without using a vehicle
Sep 4, 2012 9:54 AM
97
This valley is in dire need for a real mass transit network.
Sep 4, 2012 9:29 AM
98
Please continue to add more bike lanes for cyclists. Also, keeping signal lights
up to date on timing (i.e., sensors that work when there is a car at a light vs. no
cars)
Sep 4, 2012 9:23 AM
99
get the ridership up or get out of the bus bussiness...empty busses running
around really? Needs to be pay for it's self.
Sep 4, 2012 9:19 AM
100
Provide a light rail system, using existing tracks plus new tracks.
Sep 4, 2012 9:18 AM
101
HOV lanes are a waste of resources in this valley
Sep 4, 2012 9:13 AM
102
Why if over 10,000 seniors use the Recreation Center at Racetrack and
Burkholder, that there cannot be a bus stop in front of the building?
Sep 4, 2012 9:10 AM
103
I see people waiting for the bus everywhere. We need to get the poor to work to
improve our economy. Let's make it easier and easier and improve our public
transporation system - specially for the poor, elderly, disabled, and anyone who
can't drive!
Sep 4, 2012 9:09 AM
104
Add more bike paths.
Sep 4, 2012 9:06 AM
105
Environmental sustainibility & promoting mass transit should be the top priorities
overall.
Sep 4, 2012 9:03 AM
106
The problem with Vegas is we are too spread out. There is not enough density
to support mass transit. As a result, people will always drive their cars.
Promoting electric cars and car pooling is not practical, cost effective or
sustainable in this town and with our current culture. Two things that could help
our economy is a light rail from the outlining suburbs into downtown Vegas and
the strip AND a fast train between here and LA (not Apple Valley).
Sep 4, 2012 9:01 AM
107
buses are annoying and while the extra travel lane for the buses helps, it doesn't
help when it is also the right turn lane for motorists. bus stops are too close to
busy streets.
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
108
I know that in other US cities and in countries abroad, many people rely on
public transportation. I'm not sure why that is not the case in the Vegas Valley,
but maybe education of the public would help. I believe for me, safety is a
concern. I don't want to get on a bus and be concered that I may be robbed or
injured. Thanks for asking.
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
109
None
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
110
question 3 does not have a check box for "other"
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
111
I wish the RTC websire were more user-friendly. I'd love to be able to type in
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
14 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the needs of the
transportation network for the next 20+ years.
"from here" "to there" addresses and have the rt bus I should take pop up
112
We need to do more to encourage carpooling within the valley: More Park and
Ride sites.
Sep 4, 2012 8:56 AM
113
Annex the monorail and connect that system to UNLV, the airport & downtown
Las Vegas
Aug 29, 2012 10:30 AM
114
LV needs modern light rail on the Strip and throughout. This survey doesn't
address modes. Light rail equals jobs, renewal NV energy use, and rapid transit
for tourists, workers, low income folk and seniors. I'm a senior: seniors more
and more fear driving and consequently restrict their lives. Hwy 11 will just
expedite more trucks into the area, making local transit ever more unlivable.
Why aren't they routed around the beltway? Consider transit models as San
Diego,LA, Portland, Scacrmento, Seattle, Denver, Phoenix, SLC, Dallas as cities
with ever growing modern transit systems.
Aug 28, 2012 5:02 PM
115
Improve bus service / extend routes further out.
Aug 28, 2012 11:19 AM
116
We have a great opportunity to further develop Las Vegas into a bike commuter
community. More bike path developement....especially on main routes to the
Strip for employees.
Aug 28, 2012 10:12 AM
117
Need to promote additional funding sources for transportation infrastructure as a
high priority.
Aug 28, 2012 8:28 AM
118
need above light rail line and monorail for the whole las vegas valley and
subway for downtown las vegas to the strip to the airport and need improve
express bus for above. people mover will be the best budget like the ride tram
ride citycenter too.
Aug 26, 2012 10:14 AM
119
Increase Transit Routes Frequency
Aug 24, 2012 4:30 PM
120
Non-motoring public needs more attention.
Aug 23, 2012 9:32 AM
121
FIND SOLUTION ON HOW TO AVOID ANYMORE PEDESTRIAN / VEHICLE
ACCIDENT TO ZERO FATALITY.
Aug 23, 2012 7:48 AM
122
Expansion of mass transit and alternative transit investment will help carry a lot
of these other goals - like safety and efficiency.
Aug 22, 2012 2:06 PM
123
Re-establish reduced/eliminated routes as soon as possilbe and focus on
expanding fixed route to unserved areas.
Aug 22, 2012 12:22 PM
124
Promote walkable/bikeable, connected streets that are safe for kids to use to get
to school
Aug 22, 2012 11:20 AM
125
maintain connectivity throughout Henderson as it grows, especially to the east
Aug 22, 2012 10:21 AM
126
link transit systems to create better regional system, including monorail
Aug 22, 2012 10:02 AM
127
The use of automated tramways along the resort corridor should be considered
as a means of reducing the long term cost and congestion. Total integration of
Aug 21, 2012 4:57 PM
15 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the needs of the
transportation network for the next 20+ years.
the system with the airport will be required on a long term basis. o
128
the city's traffic light engineering sucks and is not at all timed very well.
Aug 21, 2012 4:27 PM
129
Where is our light rail? The bus system is inefficient. I would take light rail from
the Northwest to the center of town or even across town. But I will not take a bus
because the travel times are far too long.
Aug 21, 2012 4:17 PM
130
Shift Valley-wide focus from moving vehicles to moving people. Instead of
constantly widening roads to accommodate more cars, provide more mass
transit opportunties and options.
Aug 21, 2012 2:37 PM
131
For Pete's sake, don't make mass trasit the nightmare that flying is! The
'increase security' thing above gives me the willies.
Aug 21, 2012 10:07 AM
132
More transit lines stops and above ground metro (subway) services would be
ideal.
Aug 21, 2012 8:16 AM
133
Provide strategies to relieve freight and commuter congestion in heavily traveller
I-15 corridor from Charleston to Russell. Improve network of public transportation
across valley. Create a more pedestriane and bicycle friendly (if possible)
pockets in live/work areas like downtown.
Aug 20, 2012 3:35 PM
134
Improve bus dependability and frequency. FINISH a sane bike network. Make
LV a bike destination in doing so.
Aug 20, 2012 8:41 AM
135
Having lived on the east and west coasts before moving to Vegas, and having
used mass transit extensively before I moved here, I strongly support expanding
mass transit in Southern Nevada. We were thrilled to see the remote lot near
our house for the bus to the airport and were extremely pleased with the service.
Please do everything possible to expand access to mass transit, for everyone.
Thanks for your good work.
Aug 19, 2012 6:01 PM
136
Do not neglect shelters. The replacement shelters provided after bus stop
realignment are nto adequate. Example: SB Charleston & Valley View.
Aug 19, 2012 8:11 AM
137
North/South bus routes are needed West of Rainbow
Aug 18, 2012 11:12 AM
138
I would use the RTC if there were more buses and more routes. I used the
transportation system when I lived in Seattle.
Aug 17, 2012 6:25 PM
139
We need to maintain the quality service we now have. That must take priority. If
that means that rarely used routes have to be cut or curtailed, then so be it. But
the quality of the system relates directly to the safety of the system. And a
system that is not perceived by the public as safe and reliable will not be used.
Aug 17, 2012 3:11 PM
140
Just finish repairing the roads that are already torn up & get the cones out of the
streets. The LV valley will likely not see more growth any time soon. Also, if
there is any way to reign in LVVWD - they always have the roads toen up for
their water projects, and for SEVERAL months at a time.
Aug 17, 2012 12:33 PM
141
The express bus on the Strip needs to run during the morning rush. Since I can't
ride it to the Las Vegas Convention Center in the morning, I don't ride it home in
Aug 17, 2012 11:13 AM
16 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the needs of the
transportation network for the next 20+ years.
the afternoon either.
142
I would love a train system, but I know it's expensive.
Aug 17, 2012 10:48 AM
143
There should be NO priority on FIXED mass transit and low priority on other
mass transit. The Google Smart car is an example of what is coming and mass
transit systems, as they are defined today, will be obsolete in 20 years.
Aug 17, 2012 10:26 AM
144
Development of a light rail system in LV, Drastic improvement in bicycle lanes
and protective routes throughout the city.
Aug 17, 2012 9:51 AM
145
Build light rail or other form of faster, more efficient transportation like other
modern cities
Aug 17, 2012 8:59 AM
146
Please, Please, Please, if you have ANYTHING to do with it, SHUT DOWN that
STUPID Monorail idea!
Aug 17, 2012 8:46 AM
147
Two things: 1) Reduce the number of driveways on major roads such as
Tropicana and Sahara; and 2) BRT isn't working well, it should have been LRT
instead. Also, consider adding street cars to the strip. They could run in the
median and stop at each crosswalk.
Aug 17, 2012 8:32 AM
148
Help make it easier for people to get around without cars.
Aug 17, 2012 8:27 AM
149
HOV lanes from Henderson across the valley on 215
Aug 17, 2012 8:12 AM
150
more public transportation, we have enough roads
Aug 17, 2012 7:43 AM
151
Elederly transport; signal timing; convert HOV to normal travel
Aug 17, 2012 7:20 AM
152
We need a mass transit system that works for the entire valley and is more
efficient A rail system would be great and trail connectivity is key. I would use
mass transit if it didn't take me 4 hours to do what I drive in 40 mins.
Aug 17, 2012 7:20 AM
153
disallow companies to provide excessive parking for employees as a way to
encourage carpooling/public transportation use
Aug 17, 2012 5:46 AM
154
Make driving test harder. Get bad drivers off the road.
Aug 17, 2012 5:35 AM
155
Improve communication with tourists. Be open and clear about long term passes
and which ones can be used all access by tourists. Stop the movement towards
a two tier fare system that takes different fares from locals and tourists while
using Federal money for improvements of the system.
Aug 17, 2012 4:12 AM
156
A real subway system in Clark County.
Aug 16, 2012 10:49 PM
157
1. Evaluate options to route thru trucks around the Las Vegas urban core. 2.
More pedestrian and bicycle friendly streets with tree canopies and amenities
thru road diet (continue complete streets) throughout the valley. 3. Fuel tax
indexing to fund much needed transportation infrastructure. 4. Investigate
intercity rail opportunities. 5. Connect Monorail to airport. 6. Evaluate the
feasibility of completing the Beltway (Eastern - the missing link). These are a
few thoughts but there are plenty more that RTC could initiate in the next few
Aug 16, 2012 9:37 PM
17 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the needs of the
transportation network for the next 20+ years.
years. But, thus far, the agency has been extremely forward looking in many
respects but lack of funny could be a huge detriment.
158
It would be nice to see elevated transit from the outer parts of the valley to
somewhere near the Bonneville Transit Center - especially from Summerlin and
Centennial Hills
Aug 16, 2012 8:38 PM
159
Light rail please!
Aug 16, 2012 5:59 PM
160
I would like to see high speed rail considered.
Aug 16, 2012 5:27 PM
161
Develop commuter strategies that are effective to reduce the impact of single
occupant vehicular traffic
Aug 16, 2012 4:59 PM
162
repair the roads and increase capacity
Aug 16, 2012 4:45 PM
163
I think you already have your answers, and you loaded the questions on the
survey to get what you are looking for. Disabled, low income and minority
persons are being transported now, no need to expand the service. (Spend
more money)
Aug 16, 2012 4:26 PM
164
I am not sure if the above responses are of help, as it was essentially impossible
to find one of these that cannot be considered high priority. And really all fo
them build on each other. Planned appropriately, some efforts can do doubleduty.
Aug 16, 2012 4:24 PM
165
Need alternative funding method to raise funds for transportation projects
Aug 16, 2012 4:22 PM
166
RTC needs to continue the fantastic enhancements in transit system service
area and functionality that have occurred in the past ~10 years. No effort should
be spared in increasing our region's transit mode split, as that will have
enormous benefits to traffic flow, lowered emissions, empowered citizens, and a
more 21st century lifestyle. RTC should be leading a national effort to obtain
federal contributions to Operating Expenses of the transit system, so that fares
can be lowered (or kept low), because there is a significant price elasticity in
transit patronage..
Aug 16, 2012 4:20 PM
167
Increase connectivity between neighborhoods and destinations. limit cul-desacs, require developers to design with the community in mind
Aug 16, 2012 4:12 PM
168
All important strategies, support complete strees and transit options for the
public!
Aug 16, 2012 4:12 PM
169
You should try and integrate the Monorail into your overall planning so that it
connects to the aiport.
Aug 16, 2012 4:05 PM
170
Over the next 20 years we need an efficient and effective mass transportation
system that allows valley residents to make a choice about how they travel to
and from work, school and recreation. A system that truly allows someone
independence from their automobile in a convenient manner. A system that a
Aug 16, 2012 4:03 PM
171
Continue to support the transportation needs of the residents in the rural areas of
Clark County as the RTC has been doing. Additionally, look at the possibility of
Aug 16, 2012 4:02 PM
18 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the needs of the
transportation network for the next 20+ years.
providing funding (matching funding) for residents of Sandy Valley &
Goodsprings for once a week transportation into the Vegas valley for doctor
appointments, for the rural residents to access the new VA hospital and other
needs.
172
Passs legislation for fuel tax indexing for Clark County and encourage Clark
County Commissioners to provide other funding measures for local freeway and
local roadway improvements
Aug 16, 2012 3:52 PM
173
stress engaging stategies to better utilize our existing roadway system and to
provide increased capacity while protecting the environment all while developing
unique stategies to have ample funding as the Federal Government can not be
counted on nor should they.
Aug 16, 2012 3:40 PM
174
I would like to also see reduction in arterial width requirements-- without any
traffic justification. I think we can reduce our cost for building and maintaining
streets if we consider their actual traffic. Also would like to see reduced width so
that it is more pedestrian friendly. The 8 and 10 lane arterials although some are
necessary should not be the normal width. Also believe we need to consider toll
roads as an option. Will light rail ever be a component of our overall plan-- in
some manner?
Aug 16, 2012 3:38 PM
175
The Ticket Vending Machines need to have an option for the Reduced Fare! I
can't buy a reduced fare with the ticket vending machine and there are usually
no machines on the express busses that sell them. Please fix it soon because I
don't feel like getting caught by security because I couldn't buy the correct ticket
at the station.
Aug 16, 2012 3:34 PM
176
transportation funding
Aug 16, 2012 3:24 PM
177
The great need in the Las Vegas Valley is to complete the street network that we
already have. Sawtooth streets and the resulting lack of capacity and
connectivity is a huge issue in North Las Vegas and many areas of
unincorporated Clark County. Stop spending millions of dollars on HOV flyovers
in Summerlin (that benefit only wealthy commuters) and spend the money where
it is really needed - completing the street grid in neighborhoods. Fix the
problems caused by poor development decisions at the local level.
Aug 16, 2012 2:52 PM
178
Focus on human factors that influence safety, with emphasis on social world
driving the design of the traffic world to fit within the fabric of the community.
Aug 16, 2012 1:56 PM
179
City-wide access to transportaiton for the disabled
Aug 16, 2012 1:44 PM
180
Needs covered parking and reduction of fares, incentives for more utilization of
the services: tickets should not expire and I should be able to buy in bulk
Aug 16, 2012 9:54 AM
181
There are so many good, helpful projects in the planning stages that have no
funding sources; need to lobby hard for more funding from DC or wherever else
to get these projects done.
Aug 15, 2012 8:06 AM
182
More bike Lanes/Paths
Aug 14, 2012 9:09 AM
19 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q2. Additional comments? Please provide any additional thoughts you have concerning the needs of the
transportation network for the next 20+ years.
183
In order to increase participation, transit times need to be drastically reduced. My
20 minute drive to work is 1 hour, and if I miss the bus going home, I have to
wait another hour to ride home. That is much too inflexible for someone who has
the option of driving. We also need a light rail, buses cannot accomplish this feat
alone.
Aug 14, 2012 8:59 AM
184
Increase more bike lanes and right of ways
Aug 14, 2012 7:23 AM
185
Basically - improve safety, for pedestrains, bikes and cars
Aug 14, 2012 5:46 AM
186
More bike lanes!
Aug 13, 2012 8:21 PM
187
Safer areas for bicyclists, better bike lanes
Aug 13, 2012 7:32 PM
188
More general market routes.
Aug 9, 2012 4:52 PM
20 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
21 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q3. In what city do you live?
1
Summerlin
Sep 11, 2012 2:06 PM
2
Paradise
Sep 7, 2012 1:00 AM
3
Henderson
Sep 6, 2012 8:02 PM
4
BullHeadCity, AZ
Sep 5, 2012 10:06 PM
5
Nowhere
Sep 5, 2012 10:19 AM
6
Phoenix, AZ (other does not resolve - 'question requires and ans'
Sep 5, 2012 10:11 AM
7
Note; No "Other" choice available. I live in Carson City
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
8
Paradise Township - Clark County
Sep 4, 2012 9:18 AM
9
Clark County
Sep 4, 2012 9:18 AM
10
Clark County (Enterprise Township)
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
11
Unincorporated Las Vegas
Sep 4, 2012 8:57 AM
12
unincorporated Clark County
Aug 22, 2012 6:08 PM
13
Los Angeles, CA
Aug 21, 2012 4:57 PM
14
Paradise (on the border between LV and Henderson)
Aug 21, 2012 10:07 AM
15
Summerlin
Aug 18, 2012 11:12 AM
16
Unincorporated County
Aug 17, 2012 10:42 AM
17
Pahrump and soon Henderson
Aug 17, 2012 10:26 AM
18
Unincorporated Clark County (Spring Valley)
Aug 17, 2012 8:32 AM
19
Unincorporated Clark County
Aug 16, 2012 4:54 PM
20
Unincorporated Clark County
Aug 16, 2012 4:36 PM
22 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
23 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
1
89119
Sep 16, 2012 4:24 PM
2
89128
Sep 15, 2012 8:25 PM
3
89102
Sep 14, 2012 9:19 PM
4
89119
Sep 14, 2012 5:22 PM
5
89121
Sep 13, 2012 5:21 PM
6
89052
Sep 13, 2012 3:02 PM
7
89002
Sep 13, 2012 10:15 AM
8
89011
Sep 13, 2012 6:16 AM
9
89145
Sep 13, 2012 5:23 AM
10
89011
Sep 12, 2012 8:15 PM
11
89131
Sep 12, 2012 5:40 PM
12
89015
Sep 12, 2012 5:30 PM
13
89011
Sep 12, 2012 4:50 PM
14
89149
Sep 12, 2012 4:45 PM
15
89011
Sep 12, 2012 3:18 PM
16
89128
Sep 12, 2012 1:31 PM
17
89110
Sep 12, 2012 1:22 PM
18
89149
Sep 12, 2012 11:57 AM
19
89030
Sep 12, 2012 11:56 AM
20
89014
Sep 12, 2012 11:17 AM
21
89107
Sep 12, 2012 11:09 AM
22
89145
Sep 12, 2012 11:06 AM
23
89108
Sep 12, 2012 9:55 AM
24
89149
Sep 12, 2012 8:25 AM
25
89121
Sep 12, 2012 5:59 AM
26
89110
Sep 11, 2012 9:34 PM
27
89156
Sep 11, 2012 8:47 PM
24 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
28
89012
Sep 11, 2012 6:54 PM
29
89113
Sep 11, 2012 4:45 PM
30
89135
Sep 11, 2012 2:47 PM
31
89012
Sep 11, 2012 2:42 PM
32
89135
Sep 11, 2012 2:06 PM
33
89110
Sep 11, 2012 1:08 PM
34
89141
Sep 11, 2012 12:36 PM
35
89123
Sep 11, 2012 12:32 PM
36
89144
Sep 11, 2012 12:03 PM
37
89141
Sep 11, 2012 11:37 AM
38
89108
Sep 11, 2012 11:16 AM
39
89120
Sep 11, 2012 11:05 AM
40
89084
Sep 11, 2012 10:56 AM
41
89144
Sep 11, 2012 10:37 AM
42
89120
Sep 11, 2012 10:25 AM
43
89102
Sep 11, 2012 10:13 AM
44
89118
Sep 11, 2012 10:12 AM
45
89147
Sep 11, 2012 10:03 AM
46
89002
Sep 11, 2012 10:03 AM
47
89121
Sep 11, 2012 9:59 AM
48
89148
Sep 11, 2012 9:57 AM
49
89014
Sep 11, 2012 9:56 AM
50
89031
Sep 11, 2012 9:55 AM
51
89107
Sep 11, 2012 9:53 AM
52
89113
Sep 11, 2012 9:53 AM
53
89102
Sep 11, 2012 9:51 AM
54
89135
Sep 11, 2012 9:50 AM
25 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
55
89117
Sep 11, 2012 9:50 AM
56
89129
Sep 11, 2012 9:50 AM
57
89138
Sep 11, 2012 9:49 AM
58
89120
Sep 11, 2012 9:49 AM
59
89031
Sep 11, 2012 9:48 AM
60
89129
Sep 11, 2012 9:48 AM
61
89014
Sep 11, 2012 9:48 AM
62
89129
Sep 11, 2012 9:46 AM
63
89011
Sep 11, 2012 8:44 AM
64
89166
Sep 11, 2012 8:38 AM
65
89005
Sep 11, 2012 8:11 AM
66
89044
Sep 11, 2012 6:48 AM
67
89131
Sep 10, 2012 4:41 PM
68
89085
Sep 10, 2012 8:04 AM
69
89119
Sep 9, 2012 9:55 PM
70
89104
Sep 9, 2012 8:33 PM
71
89031
Sep 9, 2012 1:01 PM
72
89002
Sep 8, 2012 10:36 AM
73
89002
Sep 8, 2012 9:00 AM
74
89135
Sep 8, 2012 2:31 AM
75
89012
Sep 8, 2012 1:53 AM
76
89121
Sep 7, 2012 10:06 PM
77
89156
Sep 7, 2012 6:53 PM
78
89135
Sep 7, 2012 3:45 PM
79
89101
Sep 7, 2012 3:45 PM
80
89121
Sep 7, 2012 3:42 PM
81
89121
Sep 7, 2012 3:36 PM
26 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
82
89101
Sep 7, 2012 1:01 PM
83
89012
Sep 7, 2012 11:38 AM
84
89110
Sep 7, 2012 10:25 AM
85
89128
Sep 7, 2012 10:04 AM
86
89081
Sep 7, 2012 7:25 AM
87
89169
Sep 7, 2012 1:00 AM
88
89052
Sep 6, 2012 8:02 PM
89
89103
Sep 6, 2012 5:23 PM
90
89002
Sep 6, 2012 5:13 PM
91
89121
Sep 6, 2012 3:30 PM
92
89129
Sep 6, 2012 2:13 PM
93
89074
Sep 6, 2012 1:40 PM
94
89123
Sep 6, 2012 11:45 AM
95
89052
Sep 6, 2012 10:43 AM
96
89149
Sep 6, 2012 10:20 AM
97
89012
Sep 6, 2012 10:13 AM
98
89107
Sep 6, 2012 8:15 AM
99
89052
Sep 6, 2012 8:09 AM
100
89011
Sep 6, 2012 8:00 AM
101
89123
Sep 6, 2012 7:52 AM
102
89124
Sep 6, 2012 7:05 AM
103
89031
Sep 6, 2012 6:55 AM
104
89117
Sep 6, 2012 5:15 AM
105
89101
Sep 6, 2012 12:30 AM
106
89135
Sep 5, 2012 11:10 PM
107
89015
Sep 5, 2012 10:42 PM
108
86442
Sep 5, 2012 10:06 PM
27 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
109
89108
Sep 5, 2012 9:59 PM
110
89074
Sep 5, 2012 9:48 PM
111
89129
Sep 5, 2012 9:45 PM
112
89012
Sep 5, 2012 9:10 PM
113
89015
Sep 5, 2012 9:04 PM
114
89052
Sep 5, 2012 8:30 PM
115
89113
Sep 5, 2012 7:51 PM
116
89149
Sep 5, 2012 7:33 PM
117
89002
Sep 5, 2012 7:07 PM
118
89074
Sep 5, 2012 6:50 PM
119
89052
Sep 5, 2012 6:50 PM
120
89014
Sep 5, 2012 6:47 PM
121
89002
Sep 5, 2012 5:40 PM
122
89052
Sep 5, 2012 5:40 PM
123
89011
Sep 5, 2012 5:23 PM
124
89052
Sep 5, 2012 5:11 PM
125
89015
Sep 5, 2012 4:49 PM
126
89129
Sep 5, 2012 4:43 PM
127
89044
Sep 5, 2012 4:20 PM
128
89002
Sep 5, 2012 4:17 PM
129
89014
Sep 5, 2012 4:17 PM
130
89144
Sep 5, 2012 3:49 PM
131
89145
Sep 5, 2012 3:42 PM
132
89138
Sep 5, 2012 2:51 PM
133
89002
Sep 5, 2012 2:50 PM
134
89029
Sep 5, 2012 2:48 PM
135
89107
Sep 5, 2012 2:48 PM
28 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
136
89015
Sep 5, 2012 2:40 PM
137
89135
Sep 5, 2012 2:33 PM
138
89108
Sep 5, 2012 1:58 PM
139
89002
Sep 5, 2012 1:49 PM
140
89101
Sep 5, 2012 1:27 PM
141
89141
Sep 5, 2012 1:18 PM
142
89122
Sep 5, 2012 1:08 PM
143
89131
Sep 5, 2012 1:07 PM
144
89002
Sep 5, 2012 12:54 PM
145
89183
Sep 5, 2012 12:52 PM
146
89128
Sep 5, 2012 12:45 PM
147
89005
Sep 5, 2012 12:26 PM
148
89119
Sep 5, 2012 12:24 PM
149
89128
Sep 5, 2012 12:24 PM
150
89002
Sep 5, 2012 12:14 PM
151
89144
Sep 5, 2012 12:12 PM
152
89135
Sep 5, 2012 12:09 PM
153
89149
Sep 5, 2012 12:07 PM
154
94066
Sep 5, 2012 11:56 AM
155
89024
Sep 5, 2012 11:54 AM
156
89014
Sep 5, 2012 11:05 AM
157
89108
Sep 5, 2012 11:03 AM
158
89044
Sep 5, 2012 11:01 AM
159
89123
Sep 5, 2012 10:50 AM
160
89108
Sep 5, 2012 10:44 AM
161
89084
Sep 5, 2012 10:36 AM
162
89103
Sep 5, 2012 10:35 AM
29 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
163
89120
Sep 5, 2012 10:33 AM
164
89129
Sep 5, 2012 10:28 AM
165
89117
Sep 5, 2012 10:19 AM
166
89015
Sep 5, 2012 10:13 AM
167
89145
Sep 5, 2012 10:12 AM
168
85016
Sep 5, 2012 10:11 AM
169
89128
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
170
89122
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
171
89703
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
172
89148
Sep 5, 2012 10:08 AM
173
89145
Sep 5, 2012 10:07 AM
174
89032
Sep 5, 2012 10:07 AM
175
89032
Sep 5, 2012 10:04 AM
176
89119
Sep 5, 2012 10:03 AM
177
89131
Sep 5, 2012 10:03 AM
178
89102
Sep 5, 2012 9:59 AM
179
89149
Sep 5, 2012 9:57 AM
180
89117
Sep 5, 2012 9:55 AM
181
89015
Sep 5, 2012 9:53 AM
182
89113
Sep 5, 2012 9:53 AM
183
89108
Sep 5, 2012 9:52 AM
184
89149
Sep 5, 2012 9:52 AM
185
89074
Sep 5, 2012 9:47 AM
186
89012
Sep 5, 2012 9:47 AM
187
89002
Sep 5, 2012 9:42 AM
188
89015
Sep 5, 2012 9:28 AM
189
89002
Sep 5, 2012 9:22 AM
30 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
190
89052
Sep 5, 2012 8:59 AM
191
89141
Sep 5, 2012 8:01 AM
192
89002
Sep 5, 2012 7:19 AM
193
89015
Sep 5, 2012 6:11 AM
194
89002
Sep 5, 2012 5:51 AM
195
89178
Sep 4, 2012 8:43 PM
196
89015
Sep 4, 2012 5:53 PM
197
89121
Sep 4, 2012 5:25 PM
198
89118
Sep 4, 2012 5:23 PM
199
89123
Sep 4, 2012 5:18 PM
200
89015
Sep 4, 2012 5:17 PM
201
89128
Sep 4, 2012 4:47 PM
202
89015
Sep 4, 2012 4:17 PM
203
89119
Sep 4, 2012 4:13 PM
204
89121
Sep 4, 2012 4:11 PM
205
89104
Sep 4, 2012 3:41 PM
206
89044
Sep 4, 2012 3:31 PM
207
89113
Sep 4, 2012 3:17 PM
208
89052
Sep 4, 2012 3:09 PM
209
89178
Sep 4, 2012 2:48 PM
210
89052
Sep 4, 2012 2:13 PM
211
89011
Sep 4, 2012 1:56 PM
212
89002
Sep 4, 2012 1:51 PM
213
89149
Sep 4, 2012 1:40 PM
214
89128
Sep 4, 2012 1:39 PM
215
89178
Sep 4, 2012 1:32 PM
216
89122
Sep 4, 2012 1:15 PM
31 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
217
89123
Sep 4, 2012 1:09 PM
218
89015
Sep 4, 2012 12:39 PM
219
89014
Sep 4, 2012 12:37 PM
220
89015
Sep 4, 2012 12:34 PM
221
89074
Sep 4, 2012 12:32 PM
222
89110
Sep 4, 2012 12:23 PM
223
89052
Sep 4, 2012 12:22 PM
224
89002
Sep 4, 2012 12:21 PM
225
89052
Sep 4, 2012 12:14 PM
226
89002
Sep 4, 2012 11:40 AM
227
89117
Sep 4, 2012 11:38 AM
228
89117
Sep 4, 2012 11:34 AM
229
89005
Sep 4, 2012 11:31 AM
230
89012
Sep 4, 2012 11:22 AM
231
89002
Sep 4, 2012 11:21 AM
232
89149
Sep 4, 2012 11:20 AM
233
89012
Sep 4, 2012 11:06 AM
234
89015
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
235
89074
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
236
89002
Sep 4, 2012 10:51 AM
237
89012
Sep 4, 2012 10:44 AM
238
89002
Sep 4, 2012 10:37 AM
239
89015
Sep 4, 2012 10:28 AM
240
89074
Sep 4, 2012 10:26 AM
241
89178
Sep 4, 2012 10:24 AM
242
89074
Sep 4, 2012 10:21 AM
243
89138
Sep 4, 2012 10:18 AM
32 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
244
89144
Sep 4, 2012 10:10 AM
245
89002
Sep 4, 2012 10:09 AM
246
89074
Sep 4, 2012 9:54 AM
247
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:43 AM
248
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:42 AM
249
89147
Sep 4, 2012 9:40 AM
250
89012
Sep 4, 2012 9:33 AM
251
89074
Sep 4, 2012 9:29 AM
252
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:29 AM
253
89074
Sep 4, 2012 9:29 AM
254
89014
Sep 4, 2012 9:28 AM
255
89052
Sep 4, 2012 9:25 AM
256
89002
Sep 4, 2012 9:23 AM
257
89128
Sep 4, 2012 9:23 AM
258
89002
Sep 4, 2012 9:19 AM
259
89002
Sep 4, 2012 9:19 AM
260
89002
Sep 4, 2012 9:19 AM
261
89119
Sep 4, 2012 9:18 AM
262
89178
Sep 4, 2012 9:18 AM
263
89141
Sep 4, 2012 9:18 AM
264
89014
Sep 4, 2012 9:17 AM
265
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:14 AM
266
89011
Sep 4, 2012 9:13 AM
267
89074
Sep 4, 2012 9:12 AM
268
89014
Sep 4, 2012 9:10 AM
269
89002
Sep 4, 2012 9:09 AM
270
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:06 AM
33 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
271
89052
Sep 4, 2012 9:05 AM
272
89074
Sep 4, 2012 9:04 AM
273
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:04 AM
274
89052
Sep 4, 2012 9:03 AM
275
89002
Sep 4, 2012 9:03 AM
276
89129
Sep 4, 2012 9:02 AM
277
89002
Sep 4, 2012 9:01 AM
278
89012
Sep 4, 2012 9:01 AM
279
89002
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
280
89122
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
281
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
282
89002
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
283
89030
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
284
89002
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
285
89012
Sep 4, 2012 8:59 AM
286
89074
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
287
89052
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
288
89183
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
289
89015
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
290
89014
Sep 4, 2012 8:57 AM
291
89074
Sep 4, 2012 8:57 AM
292
89119
Sep 4, 2012 8:57 AM
293
89012
Sep 4, 2012 8:56 AM
294
89012
Sep 4, 2012 8:56 AM
295
89015
Sep 4, 2012 8:56 AM
296
89120
Sep 4, 2012 8:56 AM
297
89012
Sep 4, 2012 8:55 AM
34 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
298
89015
Sep 4, 2012 8:55 AM
299
89129
Aug 31, 2012 11:42 AM
300
89113
Aug 29, 2012 10:30 AM
301
89144
Aug 29, 2012 4:05 AM
302
89134
Aug 28, 2012 5:02 PM
303
89145
Aug 28, 2012 2:43 PM
304
89032
Aug 28, 2012 1:12 PM
305
89130
Aug 28, 2012 11:25 AM
306
89169
Aug 28, 2012 11:19 AM
307
89147
Aug 28, 2012 10:12 AM
308
89084
Aug 28, 2012 8:28 AM
309
89117
Aug 26, 2012 10:14 AM
310
89102
Aug 25, 2012 4:30 AM
311
89084
Aug 24, 2012 4:30 PM
312
89142
Aug 24, 2012 3:06 PM
313
89044
Aug 23, 2012 2:07 PM
314
89147
Aug 23, 2012 12:57 PM
315
89002
Aug 23, 2012 11:21 AM
316
89123
Aug 23, 2012 9:32 AM
317
89120
Aug 23, 2012 7:48 AM
318
89121
Aug 22, 2012 6:08 PM
319
89012
Aug 22, 2012 4:31 PM
320
89074
Aug 22, 2012 2:40 PM
321
89104
Aug 22, 2012 2:06 PM
322
89111
Aug 22, 2012 2:00 PM
323
89027
Aug 22, 2012 12:39 PM
324
89108
Aug 22, 2012 12:22 PM
35 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
325
89052
Aug 22, 2012 11:20 AM
326
89011
Aug 22, 2012 10:21 AM
327
89118
Aug 22, 2012 10:02 AM
328
89101
Aug 22, 2012 9:20 AM
329
89044
Aug 21, 2012 8:44 PM
330
89011
Aug 21, 2012 5:32 PM
331
89002
Aug 21, 2012 4:57 PM
332
90045
Aug 21, 2012 4:57 PM
333
89012
Aug 21, 2012 4:50 PM
334
89128
Aug 21, 2012 4:39 PM
335
89074
Aug 21, 2012 4:27 PM
336
89134
Aug 21, 2012 4:17 PM
337
89139
Aug 21, 2012 3:48 PM
338
89144
Aug 21, 2012 3:44 PM
339
89002
Aug 21, 2012 2:37 PM
340
89139
Aug 21, 2012 11:05 AM
341
89130
Aug 21, 2012 11:04 AM
342
89119
Aug 21, 2012 10:07 AM
343
89149
Aug 21, 2012 9:37 AM
344
89183
Aug 21, 2012 8:16 AM
345
89135
Aug 20, 2012 3:35 PM
346
89123
Aug 20, 2012 1:28 PM
347
89117
Aug 20, 2012 11:50 AM
348
89015
Aug 20, 2012 10:58 AM
349
89121
Aug 20, 2012 10:57 AM
350
89117
Aug 20, 2012 8:41 AM
351
89129
Aug 20, 2012 8:24 AM
36 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
352
89052
Aug 20, 2012 8:19 AM
353
89128
Aug 19, 2012 6:01 PM
354
89052
Aug 19, 2012 1:51 PM
355
89014
Aug 19, 2012 9:13 AM
356
89139
Aug 19, 2012 8:43 AM
357
89102
Aug 19, 2012 8:11 AM
358
89129
Aug 18, 2012 2:40 PM
359
89135
Aug 18, 2012 11:12 AM
360
89144
Aug 18, 2012 3:54 AM
361
89014
Aug 17, 2012 9:00 PM
362
89131
Aug 17, 2012 6:25 PM
363
89107
Aug 17, 2012 5:23 PM
364
89012
Aug 17, 2012 3:43 PM
365
89145
Aug 17, 2012 3:11 PM
366
89107
Aug 17, 2012 2:58 PM
367
89131
Aug 17, 2012 12:58 PM
368
89117
Aug 17, 2012 12:54 PM
369
89102
Aug 17, 2012 12:33 PM
370
89101
Aug 17, 2012 11:13 AM
371
89074
Aug 17, 2012 10:48 AM
372
89113
Aug 17, 2012 10:42 AM
373
89117
Aug 17, 2012 10:34 AM
374
89048
Aug 17, 2012 10:26 AM
375
89081
Aug 17, 2012 9:51 AM
376
89110
Aug 17, 2012 9:47 AM
377
89104
Aug 17, 2012 9:12 AM
378
89145
Aug 17, 2012 9:08 AM
37 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
379
89074
Aug 17, 2012 8:59 AM
380
89123
Aug 17, 2012 8:46 AM
381
89179
Aug 17, 2012 8:35 AM
382
89148
Aug 17, 2012 8:32 AM
383
89139
Aug 17, 2012 8:27 AM
384
89052
Aug 17, 2012 8:12 AM
385
89052
Aug 17, 2012 7:43 AM
386
89117
Aug 17, 2012 7:20 AM
387
89148
Aug 17, 2012 7:20 AM
388
89005
Aug 17, 2012 7:17 AM
389
89107
Aug 17, 2012 6:55 AM
390
89123
Aug 17, 2012 5:46 AM
391
89052
Aug 17, 2012 5:35 AM
392
12018
Aug 17, 2012 4:12 AM
393
89074
Aug 16, 2012 10:49 PM
394
89144
Aug 16, 2012 9:54 PM
395
89134
Aug 16, 2012 9:37 PM
396
89117
Aug 16, 2012 8:38 PM
397
89169
Aug 16, 2012 6:13 PM
398
89032
Aug 16, 2012 5:59 PM
399
89158
Aug 16, 2012 5:52 PM
400
89144
Aug 16, 2012 5:40 PM
401
89084
Aug 16, 2012 5:38 PM
402
89074
Aug 16, 2012 5:29 PM
403
89014
Aug 16, 2012 5:27 PM
404
89015
Aug 16, 2012 5:13 PM
405
89117
Aug 16, 2012 4:59 PM
38 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
406
89122
Aug 16, 2012 4:58 PM
407
89141
Aug 16, 2012 4:54 PM
408
89147
Aug 16, 2012 4:45 PM
409
89052
Aug 16, 2012 4:38 PM
410
89183
Aug 16, 2012 4:36 PM
411
89138
Aug 16, 2012 4:31 PM
412
89002
Aug 16, 2012 4:29 PM
413
89144
Aug 16, 2012 4:29 PM
414
89149
Aug 16, 2012 4:26 PM
415
89052
Aug 16, 2012 4:24 PM
416
89052
Aug 16, 2012 4:22 PM
417
89128
Aug 16, 2012 4:20 PM
418
89122
Aug 16, 2012 4:19 PM
419
89011
Aug 16, 2012 4:12 PM
420
89052
Aug 16, 2012 4:12 PM
421
89147
Aug 16, 2012 4:05 PM
422
89052
Aug 16, 2012 4:03 PM
423
89029
Aug 16, 2012 4:02 PM
424
89014
Aug 16, 2012 3:52 PM
425
89104
Aug 16, 2012 3:42 PM
426
89143
Aug 16, 2012 3:40 PM
427
89052
Aug 16, 2012 3:38 PM
428
89122
Aug 16, 2012 3:34 PM
429
89002
Aug 16, 2012 3:33 PM
430
89129
Aug 16, 2012 3:24 PM
431
89012
Aug 16, 2012 3:18 PM
432
89128
Aug 16, 2012 2:58 PM
39 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
433
89031
Aug 16, 2012 2:52 PM
434
89130
Aug 16, 2012 2:44 PM
435
89108
Aug 16, 2012 2:38 PM
436
89052
Aug 16, 2012 2:33 PM
437
89117
Aug 16, 2012 2:14 PM
438
89122
Aug 16, 2012 2:12 PM
439
89052
Aug 16, 2012 1:56 PM
440
89081
Aug 16, 2012 1:44 PM
441
89104
Aug 16, 2012 1:07 PM
442
89015
Aug 16, 2012 12:27 PM
443
89052
Aug 16, 2012 11:31 AM
444
89101
Aug 16, 2012 10:48 AM
445
89134
Aug 16, 2012 9:54 AM
446
89002
Aug 15, 2012 10:57 AM
447
89166
Aug 15, 2012 8:06 AM
448
89123
Aug 14, 2012 9:09 AM
449
89002
Aug 14, 2012 8:59 AM
450
89005
Aug 14, 2012 7:23 AM
451
89134
Aug 14, 2012 6:48 AM
452
89134
Aug 14, 2012 5:46 AM
453
89052
Aug 14, 2012 4:35 AM
454
89044
Aug 14, 2012 3:12 AM
455
89052
Aug 14, 2012 12:03 AM
456
89107
Aug 13, 2012 9:25 PM
457
89135
Aug 13, 2012 8:50 PM
458
89128
Aug 13, 2012 8:42 PM
459
89052
Aug 13, 2012 8:28 PM
40 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q5. Please provide the zip code in which you live.
460
89074
Aug 13, 2012 8:28 PM
461
89138
Aug 13, 2012 8:21 PM
462
89128
Aug 13, 2012 7:52 PM
463
89134
Aug 13, 2012 7:43 PM
464
89117
Aug 13, 2012 7:37 PM
465
89128
Aug 13, 2012 7:32 PM
466
89149
Aug 13, 2012 7:26 PM
467
89110
Aug 13, 2012 11:28 AM
468
89146
Aug 10, 2012 11:24 PM
469
89169
Aug 9, 2012 4:52 PM
41 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
42 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
1
89101
Sep 16, 2012 4:24 PM
2
n/a
Sep 14, 2012 9:19 PM
3
89107
Sep 14, 2012 5:22 PM
4
89012
Sep 13, 2012 3:02 PM
5
89014
Sep 13, 2012 10:15 AM
6
N.A.
Sep 13, 2012 6:16 AM
7
89030
Sep 12, 2012 8:15 PM
8
89030
Sep 12, 2012 5:40 PM
9
na
Sep 12, 2012 4:50 PM
10
89106
Sep 12, 2012 4:45 PM
11
89015
Sep 12, 2012 3:18 PM
12
89011
Sep 12, 2012 1:31 PM
13
89102
Sep 12, 2012 1:22 PM
14
89119
Sep 12, 2012 11:17 AM
15
89115
Sep 12, 2012 11:09 AM
16
89115
Sep 12, 2012 11:06 AM
17
89101
Sep 12, 2012 9:55 AM
18
89139
Sep 12, 2012 8:25 AM
19
89015
Sep 12, 2012 5:59 AM
20
89119
Sep 11, 2012 9:34 PM
21
89106
Sep 11, 2012 8:47 PM
22
89030
Sep 11, 2012 6:54 PM
23
89015
Sep 11, 2012 4:45 PM
24
89119
Sep 11, 2012 2:47 PM
25
89119
Sep 11, 2012 2:42 PM
26
89104
Sep 11, 2012 1:08 PM
27
89118
Sep 11, 2012 12:36 PM
43 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
28
89122
Sep 11, 2012 12:32 PM
29
89103
Sep 11, 2012 12:03 PM
30
89141
Sep 11, 2012 11:37 AM
31
89130
Sep 11, 2012 11:16 AM
32
89106
Sep 11, 2012 11:05 AM
33
89115, 89102
Sep 11, 2012 10:56 AM
34
89128
Sep 11, 2012 10:37 AM
35
89120
Sep 11, 2012 10:25 AM
36
89101
Sep 11, 2012 10:13 AM
37
89146
Sep 11, 2012 10:12 AM
38
89135
Sep 11, 2012 10:03 AM
39
89107
Sep 11, 2012 10:03 AM
40
89115
Sep 11, 2012 9:59 AM
41
89113
Sep 11, 2012 9:57 AM
42
89106
Sep 11, 2012 9:56 AM
43
89104
Sep 11, 2012 9:55 AM
44
89030
Sep 11, 2012 9:53 AM
45
89113
Sep 11, 2012 9:53 AM
46
89107
Sep 11, 2012 9:51 AM
47
89104
Sep 11, 2012 9:50 AM
48
89127
Sep 11, 2012 9:50 AM
49
89101
Sep 11, 2012 9:50 AM
50
89109
Sep 11, 2012 9:49 AM
51
89121
Sep 11, 2012 9:49 AM
52
89101
Sep 11, 2012 9:48 AM
53
89101
Sep 11, 2012 9:48 AM
54
89146
Sep 11, 2012 9:48 AM
44 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
55
89101
Sep 11, 2012 9:46 AM
56
89101
Sep 11, 2012 8:38 AM
57
89015
Sep 11, 2012 8:11 AM
58
89191
Sep 11, 2012 6:48 AM
59
89030
Sep 10, 2012 4:41 PM
60
89115
Sep 10, 2012 8:04 AM
61
89030
Sep 9, 2012 1:01 PM
62
89074
Sep 8, 2012 10:36 AM
63
89011
Sep 8, 2012 9:00 AM
64
89012
Sep 8, 2012 1:53 AM
65
89119
Sep 7, 2012 10:06 PM
66
89011
Sep 7, 2012 6:53 PM
67
89109
Sep 7, 2012 3:45 PM
68
89101
Sep 7, 2012 3:36 PM
69
n/a
Sep 7, 2012 11:38 AM
70
89120
Sep 7, 2012 10:25 AM
71
89032
Sep 7, 2012 10:04 AM
72
89052
Sep 6, 2012 8:02 PM
73
89014
Sep 6, 2012 5:23 PM
74
89121
Sep 6, 2012 5:13 PM
75
retired
Sep 6, 2012 3:30 PM
76
89023
Sep 6, 2012 2:13 PM
77
89015
Sep 6, 2012 1:40 PM
78
89109
Sep 6, 2012 11:45 AM
79
89012
Sep 6, 2012 10:43 AM
80
89102
Sep 6, 2012 10:20 AM
81
89011
Sep 6, 2012 10:13 AM
45 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
82
89109
Sep 6, 2012 8:15 AM
83
89015
Sep 6, 2012 8:00 AM
84
89120
Sep 6, 2012 7:05 AM
85
89015
Sep 6, 2012 6:55 AM
86
89146
Sep 6, 2012 5:15 AM
87
89102
Sep 6, 2012 12:30 AM
88
89135
Sep 5, 2012 11:10 PM
89
89148
Sep 5, 2012 9:48 PM
90
89154
Sep 5, 2012 9:45 PM
91
89030
Sep 5, 2012 9:10 PM
92
89104
Sep 5, 2012 9:04 PM
93
89109
Sep 5, 2012 7:33 PM
94
89074
Sep 5, 2012 6:50 PM
95
89120
Sep 5, 2012 6:50 PM
96
89015
Sep 5, 2012 5:40 PM
97
89119
Sep 5, 2012 5:40 PM
98
89119
Sep 5, 2012 5:23 PM
99
89015
Sep 5, 2012 5:11 PM
100
89052
Sep 5, 2012 4:49 PM
101
89101
Sep 5, 2012 4:43 PM
102
89012
Sep 5, 2012 4:17 PM
103
89119
Sep 5, 2012 4:17 PM
104
89146
Sep 5, 2012 3:49 PM
105
89109
Sep 5, 2012 3:42 PM
106
89115
Sep 5, 2012 2:51 PM
107
89120
Sep 5, 2012 2:50 PM
108
89147
Sep 5, 2012 2:33 PM
46 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
109
89144
Sep 5, 2012 1:58 PM
110
89011
Sep 5, 2012 1:49 PM
111
89101
Sep 5, 2012 1:27 PM
112
89155
Sep 5, 2012 1:18 PM
113
89122
Sep 5, 2012 1:08 PM
114
89119
Sep 5, 2012 1:07 PM
115
89015
Sep 5, 2012 12:54 PM
116
89147
Sep 5, 2012 12:52 PM
117
89109
Sep 5, 2012 12:45 PM
118
89011
Sep 5, 2012 12:26 PM
119
89101
Sep 5, 2012 12:24 PM
120
89115
Sep 5, 2012 12:14 PM
121
89144
Sep 5, 2012 12:12 PM
122
89154
Sep 5, 2012 12:09 PM
123
89024
Sep 5, 2012 11:54 AM
124
89118
Sep 5, 2012 11:01 AM
125
89123
Sep 5, 2012 10:50 AM
126
89121
Sep 5, 2012 10:44 AM
127
89102
Sep 5, 2012 10:36 AM
128
89109
Sep 5, 2012 10:35 AM
129
89191
Sep 5, 2012 10:33 AM
130
89030
Sep 5, 2012 10:28 AM
131
89117
Sep 5, 2012 10:19 AM
132
89121
Sep 5, 2012 10:13 AM
133
89118
Sep 5, 2012 10:12 AM
134
85018
Sep 5, 2012 10:11 AM
135
89106
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
47 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
136
89113
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
137
89701
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
138
89106
Sep 5, 2012 10:08 AM
139
89106
Sep 5, 2012 10:07 AM
140
89032
Sep 5, 2012 10:07 AM
141
89030
Sep 5, 2012 10:04 AM
142
89119
Sep 5, 2012 10:03 AM
143
89101
Sep 5, 2012 10:03 AM
144
89101
Sep 5, 2012 9:59 AM
145
89032
Sep 5, 2012 9:57 AM
146
89146
Sep 5, 2012 9:55 AM
147
89148
Sep 5, 2012 9:53 AM
148
89154
Sep 5, 2012 9:53 AM
149
89146
Sep 5, 2012 9:52 AM
150
89146
Sep 5, 2012 9:52 AM
151
89011
Sep 5, 2012 9:47 AM
152
89015
Sep 5, 2012 9:47 AM
153
89074
Sep 5, 2012 9:42 AM
154
89015
Sep 5, 2012 9:28 AM
155
89015
Sep 5, 2012 9:22 AM
156
89015
Sep 5, 2012 8:59 AM
157
89104
Sep 5, 2012 8:01 AM
158
89015
Sep 5, 2012 7:19 AM
159
89114
Sep 4, 2012 8:43 PM
160
89102
Sep 4, 2012 5:18 PM
161
89002
Sep 4, 2012 4:47 PM
162
89015
Sep 4, 2012 4:17 PM
48 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
163
89015
Sep 4, 2012 4:11 PM
164
89104
Sep 4, 2012 3:41 PM
165
89014
Sep 4, 2012 3:31 PM
166
89120
Sep 4, 2012 3:17 PM
167
89015
Sep 4, 2012 3:09 PM
168
89109
Sep 4, 2012 2:48 PM
169
89113
Sep 4, 2012 2:13 PM
170
89015
Sep 4, 2012 1:56 PM
171
89015
Sep 4, 2012 1:51 PM
172
89015
Sep 4, 2012 1:40 PM
173
89011
Sep 4, 2012 1:39 PM
174
89109
Sep 4, 2012 1:32 PM
175
89015
Sep 4, 2012 1:15 PM
176
89011
Sep 4, 2012 1:09 PM
177
89015
Sep 4, 2012 12:39 PM
178
89015
Sep 4, 2012 12:37 PM
179
89015
Sep 4, 2012 12:34 PM
180
89015
Sep 4, 2012 12:32 PM
181
89015
Sep 4, 2012 12:23 PM
182
89015
Sep 4, 2012 12:22 PM
183
89015
Sep 4, 2012 12:21 PM
184
89011
Sep 4, 2012 12:14 PM
185
89015
Sep 4, 2012 11:40 AM
186
Aria
Sep 4, 2012 11:38 AM
187
89052
Sep 4, 2012 11:34 AM
188
89015
Sep 4, 2012 11:31 AM
189
89015
Sep 4, 2012 11:22 AM
49 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
190
89011
Sep 4, 2012 11:21 AM
191
89015
Sep 4, 2012 11:20 AM
192
89009
Sep 4, 2012 11:06 AM
193
89015
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
194
89009
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
195
89015
Sep 4, 2012 10:51 AM
196
89015
Sep 4, 2012 10:44 AM
197
89015
Sep 4, 2012 10:37 AM
198
89015
Sep 4, 2012 10:28 AM
199
89015
Sep 4, 2012 10:26 AM
200
89015
Sep 4, 2012 10:24 AM
201
89015
Sep 4, 2012 10:21 AM
202
89101
Sep 4, 2012 10:18 AM
203
89009
Sep 4, 2012 10:10 AM
204
89011
Sep 4, 2012 10:09 AM
205
89011
Sep 4, 2012 9:54 AM
206
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:43 AM
207
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:42 AM
208
89147
Sep 4, 2012 9:40 AM
209
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:33 AM
210
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:29 AM
211
89074
Sep 4, 2012 9:28 AM
212
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:25 AM
213
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:23 AM
214
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:23 AM
215
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:19 AM
216
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:19 AM
50 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
217
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:19 AM
218
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:18 AM
219
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:18 AM
220
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:18 AM
221
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:17 AM
222
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:14 AM
223
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:13 AM
224
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:12 AM
225
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:10 AM
226
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:09 AM
227
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:06 AM
228
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:05 AM
229
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:04 AM
230
89011
Sep 4, 2012 9:04 AM
231
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:03 AM
232
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:02 AM
233
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:01 AM
234
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:01 AM
235
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
236
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
237
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
238
89074
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
239
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
240
89015
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
241
89015
Sep 4, 2012 8:59 AM
242
89015
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
243
89015
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
51 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
244
89009
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
245
89015
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
246
89015
Sep 4, 2012 8:57 AM
247
89011
Sep 4, 2012 8:57 AM
248
89009
Sep 4, 2012 8:56 AM
249
89015
Sep 4, 2012 8:56 AM
250
89015
Sep 4, 2012 8:56 AM
251
89015
Sep 4, 2012 8:56 AM
252
89015
Sep 4, 2012 8:55 AM
253
89146
Aug 31, 2012 11:42 AM
254
89154
Aug 29, 2012 10:30 AM
255
89106
Aug 28, 2012 2:43 PM
256
89032
Aug 28, 2012 1:12 PM
257
89121
Aug 28, 2012 11:25 AM
258
89109
Aug 28, 2012 11:19 AM
259
89104
Aug 28, 2012 10:12 AM
260
89030
Aug 28, 2012 8:28 AM
261
89117
Aug 26, 2012 10:14 AM
262
NA
Aug 25, 2012 4:30 AM
263
89082
Aug 24, 2012 4:30 PM
264
89106
Aug 24, 2012 3:06 PM
265
89107
Aug 23, 2012 2:07 PM
266
89117
Aug 23, 2012 11:21 AM
267
89101
Aug 23, 2012 9:32 AM
268
89106
Aug 23, 2012 7:48 AM
269
89104
Aug 22, 2012 6:08 PM
270
89106
Aug 22, 2012 4:31 PM
52 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
271
89101
Aug 22, 2012 2:40 PM
272
89027
Aug 22, 2012 12:39 PM
273
89146
Aug 22, 2012 12:22 PM
274
89106
Aug 22, 2012 11:20 AM
275
89169
Aug 22, 2012 10:02 AM
276
89146
Aug 21, 2012 8:44 PM
277
89015
Aug 21, 2012 4:57 PM
278
90045
Aug 21, 2012 4:57 PM
279
89144
Aug 21, 2012 4:39 PM
280
89144
Aug 21, 2012 4:17 PM
281
89144
Aug 21, 2012 3:48 PM
282
89144
Aug 21, 2012 3:44 PM
283
89015
Aug 21, 2012 2:37 PM
284
89106
Aug 21, 2012 11:05 AM
285
89131
Aug 21, 2012 11:04 AM
286
89119
Aug 21, 2012 10:07 AM
287
89101
Aug 21, 2012 9:37 AM
288
89015
Aug 21, 2012 8:16 AM
289
89109
Aug 20, 2012 3:35 PM
290
89150
Aug 20, 2012 1:28 PM
291
89155
Aug 20, 2012 11:50 AM
292
89121
Aug 20, 2012 10:58 AM
293
89101
Aug 20, 2012 10:57 AM
294
89106
Aug 20, 2012 8:41 AM
295
89015
Aug 20, 2012 8:24 AM
296
89015
Aug 20, 2012 8:19 AM
297
89101
Aug 19, 2012 6:01 PM
53 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
298
89014
Aug 19, 2012 1:51 PM
299
89119
Aug 19, 2012 9:13 AM
300
89119
Aug 19, 2012 8:43 AM
301
89093
Aug 18, 2012 2:40 PM
302
89102
Aug 18, 2012 3:54 AM
303
89119
Aug 17, 2012 9:00 PM
304
89101
Aug 17, 2012 6:25 PM
305
89102
Aug 17, 2012 5:23 PM
306
89074
Aug 17, 2012 3:43 PM
307
89113
Aug 17, 2012 3:11 PM
308
89109
Aug 17, 2012 2:58 PM
309
89131
Aug 17, 2012 12:58 PM
310
89113
Aug 17, 2012 12:54 PM
311
89148
Aug 17, 2012 12:33 PM
312
89109
Aug 17, 2012 11:13 AM
313
89104
Aug 17, 2012 10:48 AM
314
89169
Aug 17, 2012 10:42 AM
315
89101
Aug 17, 2012 10:34 AM
316
89148
Aug 17, 2012 10:26 AM
317
89191
Aug 17, 2012 9:51 AM
318
89119
Aug 17, 2012 9:47 AM
319
89101
Aug 17, 2012 9:12 AM
320
89128
Aug 17, 2012 9:08 AM
321
89144
Aug 17, 2012 8:59 AM
322
89106
Aug 17, 2012 8:46 AM
323
89101
Aug 17, 2012 8:35 AM
324
89113
Aug 17, 2012 8:32 AM
54 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
325
89110
Aug 17, 2012 8:12 AM
326
89191
Aug 17, 2012 7:20 AM
327
89015
Aug 17, 2012 7:20 AM
328
89106
Aug 17, 2012 7:17 AM
329
89032
Aug 17, 2012 6:55 AM
330
89147
Aug 17, 2012 5:46 AM
331
89009
Aug 17, 2012 5:35 AM
332
N/A
Aug 16, 2012 10:49 PM
333
89135
Aug 16, 2012 9:54 PM
334
89074
Aug 16, 2012 9:37 PM
335
89106
Aug 16, 2012 8:38 PM
336
89109
Aug 16, 2012 6:13 PM
337
89107
Aug 16, 2012 5:59 PM
338
89128
Aug 16, 2012 5:52 PM
339
89106
Aug 16, 2012 5:40 PM
340
89044
Aug 16, 2012 5:38 PM
341
89118
Aug 16, 2012 5:29 PM
342
89009
Aug 16, 2012 5:27 PM
343
89030
Aug 16, 2012 5:13 PM
344
89106
Aug 16, 2012 4:59 PM
345
89009
Aug 16, 2012 4:58 PM
346
89102
Aug 16, 2012 4:54 PM
347
89118
Aug 16, 2012 4:45 PM
348
89146
Aug 16, 2012 4:38 PM
349
89106
Aug 16, 2012 4:31 PM
350
89111
Aug 16, 2012 4:29 PM
351
89052
Aug 16, 2012 4:29 PM
55 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
352
89142
Aug 16, 2012 4:26 PM
353
89101
Aug 16, 2012 4:24 PM
354
89101
Aug 16, 2012 4:22 PM
355
89101
Aug 16, 2012 4:20 PM
356
89122
Aug 16, 2012 4:19 PM
357
89015
Aug 16, 2012 4:12 PM
358
89009
Aug 16, 2012 4:12 PM
359
89169
Aug 16, 2012 4:05 PM
360
89015
Aug 16, 2012 4:03 PM
361
89128
Aug 16, 2012 3:52 PM
362
89125
Aug 16, 2012 3:42 PM
363
89106
Aug 16, 2012 3:40 PM
364
89119
Aug 16, 2012 3:38 PM
365
89191
Aug 16, 2012 3:34 PM
366
89101
Aug 16, 2012 3:33 PM
367
89146
Aug 16, 2012 3:24 PM
368
89118
Aug 16, 2012 3:18 PM
369
89169
Aug 16, 2012 2:58 PM
370
89009
Aug 16, 2012 2:52 PM
371
89106
Aug 16, 2012 2:44 PM
372
89106
Aug 16, 2012 2:38 PM
373
89106
Aug 16, 2012 2:33 PM
374
89122
Aug 16, 2012 2:12 PM
375
89106
Aug 16, 2012 1:56 PM
376
89146
Aug 16, 2012 1:44 PM
377
89155
Aug 16, 2012 1:07 PM
378
89014
Aug 16, 2012 12:27 PM
56 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q6. Please provide the zip code in which you work (if applicable).
379
89106
Aug 16, 2012 11:31 AM
380
89169
Aug 16, 2012 9:54 AM
381
89106
Aug 15, 2012 10:57 AM
382
89119
Aug 15, 2012 8:06 AM
383
89119
Aug 14, 2012 8:59 AM
384
89014
Aug 14, 2012 7:23 AM
385
89032
Aug 14, 2012 6:48 AM
386
89128
Aug 14, 2012 5:46 AM
387
89119
Aug 14, 2012 4:35 AM
388
89030
Aug 14, 2012 3:12 AM
389
89052
Aug 14, 2012 12:03 AM
390
89102
Aug 13, 2012 9:25 PM
391
89118
Aug 13, 2012 8:50 PM
392
89052
Aug 13, 2012 8:28 PM
393
89077
Aug 13, 2012 8:21 PM
394
89106
Aug 13, 2012 7:52 PM
395
89102
Aug 13, 2012 7:43 PM
396
89117
Aug 13, 2012 7:37 PM
397
89128
Aug 13, 2012 7:32 PM
398
89101
Aug 13, 2012 11:28 AM
399
89109
Aug 10, 2012 11:24 PM
400
89169
Aug 9, 2012 4:52 PM
57 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
58 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q8. OPTIONAL: If you would like to receive more information about the Regional Transportation Plan, please
provide us with your contact information so we can send you further details.
Name:
1
Walter Tuttle
Sep 14, 2012 9:19 PM
3
John Hendrickson
Sep 13, 2012 6:16 AM
4
Brian Aldrich
Sep 13, 2012 5:23 AM
5
Mike Mula
Sep 12, 2012 1:31 PM
6
Carlos Gomez
Sep 12, 2012 9:55 AM
7
stavan corbett
Sep 11, 2012 9:34 PM
8
Jonathan Galaviz
Sep 11, 2012 2:06 PM
9
Alma Vasquez
Sep 11, 2012 10:56 AM
10
Daniel Casas
Sep 11, 2012 10:25 AM
11
MC Perez
Sep 11, 2012 10:13 AM
12
Greta Peay
Sep 11, 2012 9:50 AM
13
Gregory George
Sep 11, 2012 8:38 AM
14
Robert Uszynski
Sep 8, 2012 9:00 AM
16
ashley greenstein
Sep 7, 2012 3:36 PM
17
Evan L Price
Sep 7, 2012 1:01 PM
18
Roberta Lipman
Sep 7, 2012 11:38 AM
19
John Russell
Sep 6, 2012 8:02 PM
21
Roy A.J. Trafton
Sep 6, 2012 5:15 AM
22
G.C. Wilson
Sep 6, 2012 12:30 AM
23
Steven Sharkey
Sep 5, 2012 11:10 PM
24
Fred Herbert
Sep 5, 2012 10:06 PM
25
Edward J. Sutter
Sep 5, 2012 9:10 PM
26
TINA BARR
Sep 5, 2012 8:30 PM
27
John Newman
Sep 5, 2012 6:50 PM
28
Sara Barry
Sep 5, 2012 6:50 PM
29
Dan Mazzella
Sep 5, 2012 4:17 PM
59 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q8. OPTIONAL: If you would like to receive more information about the Regional Transportation Plan, please
provide us with your contact information so we can send you further details.
30
Lupe Farran
Sep 5, 2012 2:48 PM
31
Denise Brenner
Sep 5, 2012 1:58 PM
32
patricia woodson
Sep 5, 2012 1:27 PM
33
Jorge Alvarez
Sep 5, 2012 1:08 PM
34
Paul Noga
Sep 5, 2012 12:24 PM
35
Amanda Ireland
Sep 5, 2012 12:09 PM
36
hellmund wong
Sep 5, 2012 11:56 AM
37
Mark H. Ladenson
Sep 5, 2012 11:03 AM
38
Michele Mueller
Sep 5, 2012 10:50 AM
39
joyce demer
Sep 5, 2012 10:35 AM
40
Joseph Broderick
Sep 5, 2012 10:19 AM
41
michael labianca
Sep 5, 2012 10:11 AM
42
Jose G Gonzalez
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
43
Sue Brents
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
44
Ken Lambert
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
45
Jason Doering
Sep 5, 2012 10:08 AM
46
James Walsh
Sep 5, 2012 10:03 AM
47
Nancy McCloskey
Sep 5, 2012 9:59 AM
48
Mark Urban
Sep 5, 2012 9:57 AM
49
Mark Schrader
Sep 5, 2012 9:42 AM
50
Anita Lewy
Sep 4, 2012 5:23 PM
51
Jill Cange
Sep 4, 2012 5:18 PM
52
Poly Arcos
Sep 4, 2012 3:41 PM
53
CHRISTIAN CHOI
Sep 4, 2012 3:17 PM
54
Rex Hardy
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
55
N/A
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
56
Thomas Porter
Sep 4, 2012 9:40 AM
60 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q8. OPTIONAL: If you would like to receive more information about the Regional Transportation Plan, please
provide us with your contact information so we can send you further details.
57
Laura Nelson
Sep 4, 2012 9:09 AM
58
Lee Guyette
Sep 4, 2012 9:04 AM
59
Paul Brooksbank
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
60
andrew roether
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
61
Tina Sigman
Sep 4, 2012 8:57 AM
62
James Chaddick & Associates
Aug 29, 2012 10:30 AM
63
Nick Leonard
Aug 29, 2012 4:05 AM
64
Edward Arbuckle
Aug 28, 2012 5:02 PM
65
Dr. Joseph A. Pantuso
Aug 28, 2012 11:25 AM
66
john versoza
Aug 26, 2012 10:14 AM
67
Rae Lathrop
Aug 22, 2012 2:06 PM
68
Mike Griffus
Aug 21, 2012 4:57 PM
69
John Enfield
Aug 21, 2012 10:07 AM
70
Dawn Okerlund
Aug 21, 2012 8:16 AM
71
Windom Kimsey
Aug 19, 2012 1:51 PM
72
Ken Ackeret
Aug 19, 2012 8:43 AM
73
Craig Galati
Aug 18, 2012 3:54 AM
74
Andy Blanchard
Aug 17, 2012 3:43 PM
75
Edward R. Guthrie
Aug 17, 2012 12:54 PM
76
John Brownrigg
Aug 17, 2012 12:33 PM
77
Kami Dempsey
Aug 17, 2012 10:34 AM
78
Michelle Strawn
Aug 17, 2012 9:51 AM
79
Barbara Boos
Aug 17, 2012 9:47 AM
80
Michael Vannozzi
Aug 17, 2012 9:12 AM
81
Jon Zetzman
Aug 17, 2012 8:32 AM
82
Thomas Wolch
Aug 16, 2012 5:27 PM
83
Tony Timmons
Aug 16, 2012 4:36 PM
61 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q8. OPTIONAL: If you would like to receive more information about the Regional Transportation Plan, please
provide us with your contact information so we can send you further details.
84
David J Saltman
Aug 16, 2012 4:29 PM
85
Mauricia Baca
Aug 16, 2012 4:24 PM
86
mike janssen
Aug 16, 2012 4:22 PM
87
Glenn Grayson
Aug 16, 2012 4:20 PM
89
Lolene Terry
Aug 16, 2012 3:38 PM
90
Gene Krametbauer
Aug 16, 2012 3:24 PM
91
Doug Rankin
Aug 16, 2012 2:38 PM
92
Ken Larson
Aug 16, 2012 1:56 PM
93
Jason Cronkhite
Aug 15, 2012 8:06 AM
94
Chris Race
Aug 14, 2012 8:59 AM
95
Mark Greenberg
Aug 14, 2012 7:23 AM
96
Monica Taylor
Aug 14, 2012 5:46 AM
97
James C. Little
Aug 13, 2012 8:42 PM
98
Keely Brooks
Aug 13, 2012 7:52 PM
99
Francisco Eufemia
Aug 13, 2012 11:28 AM
100
Nathaniel Gillespie
Aug 9, 2012 4:52 PM
Affiliation (if relevant):
8
Galaviz & Company LLC
Sep 11, 2012 2:06 PM
10
Casas Electric.
Sep 11, 2012 10:25 AM
11
Admin. Assistant
Sep 11, 2012 10:13 AM
16
future urban planner
Sep 7, 2012 3:36 PM
25
Green Valley Ranch HOA Board Member
Sep 5, 2012 9:10 PM
27
BHG Real Estate
Sep 5, 2012 6:50 PM
38
Mueller Striping
Sep 5, 2012 10:50 AM
41
HDR Engineering
Sep 5, 2012 10:11 AM
43
Rider on Public Transportation for 12 years (to work-service only gets me within
2 1/2 miles from work doctor appts/shopping/etc.)
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
62 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q8. OPTIONAL: If you would like to receive more information about the Regional Transportation Plan, please
provide us with your contact information so we can send you further details.
44
Jacobs Engineering
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
45
United Transportation Union - Union Pacific Railroad
Sep 5, 2012 10:08 AM
46
Bike rider/ bus customer
Sep 5, 2012 10:03 AM
49
COH
Sep 5, 2012 9:42 AM
50
702-247-4441
Sep 4, 2012 5:23 PM
54
City of Henderson
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
55
N/A
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
57
City of Henderson
Sep 4, 2012 9:09 AM
60
SNRPC, HUD regional sustainable communities planning grant
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
62
ASLA
Aug 29, 2012 10:30 AM
65
SNHBA
Aug 28, 2012 11:25 AM
67
Outside Las Vegas Foundation
Aug 22, 2012 2:06 PM
68
Keolis Transit America
Aug 21, 2012 4:57 PM
72
Kimley-Horn
Aug 19, 2012 8:43 AM
75
Opportunity Village
Aug 17, 2012 12:54 PM
76
Public Utilities Commission of NV - Staff Financial Analyst
Aug 17, 2012 12:33 PM
78
BSBAC Committee member
Aug 17, 2012 9:51 AM
84
The Vista Group
Aug 16, 2012 4:29 PM
85
Outside Las Vegas Foundation
Aug 16, 2012 4:24 PM
87
RTC (retired)
Aug 16, 2012 4:20 PM
89
HDR Engineering
Aug 16, 2012 3:38 PM
91
City of Las Vegas
Aug 16, 2012 2:38 PM
92
Clark County
Aug 16, 2012 1:56 PM
97
Las Vegas Valley Bicycle Club
Aug 13, 2012 8:42 PM
98
SNWA
Aug 13, 2012 7:52 PM
100
Transit Rider
Aug 9, 2012 4:52 PM
Phone number and/or email address:
63 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q8. OPTIONAL: If you would like to receive more information about the Regional Transportation Plan, please
provide us with your contact information so we can send you further details.
1
702-528-0986 [email protected]
Sep 14, 2012 9:19 PM
2
[email protected]
Sep 13, 2012 5:21 PM
3
[email protected]
Sep 13, 2012 6:16 AM
4
[email protected]
Sep 13, 2012 5:23 AM
5
[email protected]
Sep 12, 2012 1:31 PM
6
[email protected]
Sep 12, 2012 9:55 AM
7
[email protected]
Sep 11, 2012 9:34 PM
8
[email protected]
Sep 11, 2012 2:06 PM
9
[email protected]
Sep 11, 2012 10:56 AM
10
[email protected] 702-597-2093
Sep 11, 2012 10:25 AM
11
[email protected]
Sep 11, 2012 10:13 AM
12
702 7998484
Sep 11, 2012 9:50 AM
13
220-9409 [email protected]
Sep 11, 2012 8:38 AM
14
[email protected]
Sep 8, 2012 9:00 AM
15
[email protected]
Sep 7, 2012 10:06 PM
16
[email protected]
Sep 7, 2012 3:36 PM
17
[email protected]
Sep 7, 2012 1:01 PM
18
[email protected]
Sep 7, 2012 11:38 AM
19
[email protected]
Sep 6, 2012 8:02 PM
20
[email protected]
Sep 6, 2012 8:00 AM
21
[email protected]
Sep 6, 2012 5:15 AM
22
[email protected]
Sep 6, 2012 12:30 AM
23
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 11:10 PM
24
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 10:06 PM
25
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 9:10 PM
26
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 8:30 PM
27
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 6:50 PM
64 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q8. OPTIONAL: If you would like to receive more information about the Regional Transportation Plan, please
provide us with your contact information so we can send you further details.
28
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 6:50 PM
29
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 4:17 PM
30
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 2:48 PM
31
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 1:58 PM
32
7027822658, [email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 1:27 PM
33
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 1:08 PM
34
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 12:24 PM
35
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 12:09 PM
36
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 11:56 AM
37
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 11:03 AM
38
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 10:50 AM
39
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 10:35 AM
40
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 10:19 AM
41
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 10:11 AM
42
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
43
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
44
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
45
2024800587 [email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 10:08 AM
46
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 10:03 AM
47
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 9:59 AM
48
[email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 9:57 AM
49
unlisted
Sep 5, 2012 9:42 AM
50
53543 Lindell Rd. #1084, LV NV 89118
Sep 4, 2012 5:23 PM
51
[email protected]
Sep 4, 2012 5:18 PM
52
[email protected]
Sep 4, 2012 3:41 PM
53
[email protected]
Sep 4, 2012 3:17 PM
54
[email protected]
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
65 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q8. OPTIONAL: If you would like to receive more information about the Regional Transportation Plan, please
provide us with your contact information so we can send you further details.
55
N/A
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
56
E-mail [email protected]
Sep 4, 2012 9:40 AM
57
[email protected]
Sep 4, 2012 9:09 AM
58
[email protected]
Sep 4, 2012 9:04 AM
59
[email protected]
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
60
[email protected]
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
61
[email protected]
Sep 4, 2012 8:57 AM
62
[email protected]
Aug 29, 2012 10:30 AM
63
[email protected]
Aug 29, 2012 4:05 AM
64
[email protected]
Aug 28, 2012 5:02 PM
65
[email protected]
Aug 28, 2012 11:25 AM
66
[email protected]
Aug 26, 2012 10:14 AM
67
[email protected]
Aug 22, 2012 2:06 PM
68
[email protected]
Aug 21, 2012 4:57 PM
69
[email protected]
Aug 21, 2012 10:07 AM
70
[email protected]
Aug 21, 2012 8:16 AM
71
456-3000
Aug 19, 2012 1:51 PM
72
[email protected]
Aug 19, 2012 8:43 AM
73
[email protected]
Aug 18, 2012 3:54 AM
74
[email protected]
Aug 17, 2012 3:43 PM
75
[email protected]
Aug 17, 2012 12:54 PM
76
702-486-7241 or [email protected]
Aug 17, 2012 12:33 PM
77
[email protected]
Aug 17, 2012 10:34 AM
78
[email protected]
Aug 17, 2012 9:51 AM
79
[email protected]
Aug 17, 2012 9:47 AM
80
[email protected]
Aug 17, 2012 9:12 AM
81
[email protected]
Aug 17, 2012 8:32 AM
66 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q8. OPTIONAL: If you would like to receive more information about the Regional Transportation Plan, please
provide us with your contact information so we can send you further details.
82
Thomas.Wolch@cityof henderson.com
Aug 16, 2012 5:27 PM
83
[email protected]
Aug 16, 2012 4:36 PM
84
(702) 798-7970
Aug 16, 2012 4:29 PM
85
702-715-0226
Aug 16, 2012 4:24 PM
86
[email protected]
Aug 16, 2012 4:22 PM
87
702-572-1651 [email protected]
Aug 16, 2012 4:20 PM
88
[email protected]
Aug 16, 2012 3:52 PM
89
702-938-6002 [email protected]
Aug 16, 2012 3:38 PM
90
[email protected]
Aug 16, 2012 3:24 PM
91
[email protected]
Aug 16, 2012 2:38 PM
92
455-4567
Aug 16, 2012 1:56 PM
93
702-283-9736 / [email protected]
Aug 15, 2012 8:06 AM
94
[email protected]
Aug 14, 2012 8:59 AM
95
[email protected]
Aug 14, 2012 7:23 AM
96
702-592-1872
Aug 14, 2012 5:46 AM
97
[email protected]
98
[email protected]
Aug 13, 2012 7:52 PM
99
[email protected]
Aug 13, 2012 11:28 AM
100
[email protected]
[email protected]
702-360-4751
Aug 13, 2012 8:42 PM
Aug 9, 2012 4:52 PM
67 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
68 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q9. How did you find out about this survey? Please check more than one if needed.
1
internet
Sep 14, 2012 9:19 PM
2
googled it
Sep 13, 2012 5:21 PM
3
email
Sep 13, 2012 3:02 PM
4
Email from Latin Chamber
Sep 13, 2012 10:15 AM
5
email from Latin Chamber of Commerce
Sep 12, 2012 5:40 PM
6
Neighborhood Watch Captain
Sep 12, 2012 4:50 PM
7
neighborhood watch
Sep 12, 2012 3:18 PM
8
email
Sep 12, 2012 1:31 PM
9
email
Sep 12, 2012 11:17 AM
10
Latin Chamber of Commerce
Sep 12, 2012 9:55 AM
11
email
Sep 11, 2012 9:34 PM
12
e-mail
Sep 11, 2012 8:47 PM
13
Email
Sep 11, 2012 6:54 PM
14
email
Sep 11, 2012 2:47 PM
15
email
Sep 11, 2012 2:42 PM
16
Email from Latin Chamber of Commerce
Sep 11, 2012 2:06 PM
17
Las Vegas Latin Chamber of Commerce
Sep 11, 2012 1:08 PM
18
LCOC
Sep 11, 2012 12:36 PM
19
e mail
Sep 11, 2012 11:37 AM
20
Latin Chamber of Commerce
Sep 11, 2012 11:16 AM
21
It was emailed to me.
Sep 11, 2012 11:05 AM
22
Received via email
Sep 11, 2012 10:56 AM
23
received email
Sep 11, 2012 10:37 AM
24
e-mail
Sep 11, 2012 10:25 AM
25
Latin Chamber of Commerce
Sep 11, 2012 10:13 AM
26
Co-worker
Sep 11, 2012 10:12 AM
27
email
Sep 11, 2012 10:03 AM
69 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q9. How did you find out about this survey? Please check more than one if needed.
28
Email from Latin Chamber of Commerce
Sep 11, 2012 10:03 AM
29
Email: Latin Chamber
Sep 11, 2012 9:59 AM
30
Latin Chamber of Commerce Email
Sep 11, 2012 9:57 AM
31
e-mail
Sep 11, 2012 9:56 AM
32
LV Latin Chamber email blast
Sep 11, 2012 9:55 AM
33
Latin Chamber of Commerce email
Sep 11, 2012 9:53 AM
34
Latin Chamber of Commerce e-mail
Sep 11, 2012 9:53 AM
35
Latin Chamber of Commerce
Sep 11, 2012 9:50 AM
36
An email was sent to me.
Sep 11, 2012 9:50 AM
37
email
Sep 11, 2012 9:50 AM
38
E-mail
Sep 11, 2012 9:49 AM
39
E-mail
Sep 11, 2012 9:48 AM
40
Latin Chamber of Commerce
Sep 11, 2012 9:48 AM
41
Las Vegas Latin Chamber of Commerce
Sep 11, 2012 9:48 AM
42
e-mail
Sep 11, 2012 8:44 AM
43
Henderson Trails Day
Sep 11, 2012 6:48 AM
44
you e-mailed it to me
Sep 10, 2012 4:41 PM
45
email
Sep 9, 2012 9:55 PM
46
received email independent of any social networking site
Sep 9, 2012 8:33 PM
47
e-mail
Sep 8, 2012 10:36 AM
48
City of Henderson Employee e-mail
Sep 8, 2012 9:00 AM
49
Direct Email
Sep 8, 2012 2:31 AM
50
Las vegas bicycle co op
Sep 8, 2012 1:53 AM
51
email
Sep 7, 2012 10:06 PM
52
email
Sep 7, 2012 3:42 PM
53
Public Pedal/ Fremont Bicycle Clinic
Sep 7, 2012 3:36 PM
54
email
Sep 7, 2012 1:01 PM
70 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q9. How did you find out about this survey? Please check more than one if needed.
55
city of Henderson email blast
Sep 7, 2012 10:25 AM
56
RTC online newsletter
Sep 7, 2012 7:25 AM
57
I was looking for information on the roadwork outside my home and found the
survey. Still don't know what is being done outside my apartment at midnight, but
glad I could do something while not sleeping.
Sep 7, 2012 1:00 AM
58
internet
Sep 6, 2012 5:13 PM
59
Email
Sep 6, 2012 2:13 PM
60
work email
Sep 6, 2012 1:40 PM
61
thru ClubRide
Sep 6, 2012 10:43 AM
62
received email
Sep 6, 2012 10:20 AM
63
email
Sep 6, 2012 10:13 AM
64
email
Sep 6, 2012 8:15 AM
65
email
Sep 6, 2012 8:09 AM
66
COH Neighborhood Services E-Inform
Sep 6, 2012 8:00 AM
67
City of Henderson Employee, sent via City email.
Sep 6, 2012 6:55 AM
68
email sent to me from the RTC
Sep 5, 2012 11:10 PM
69
email from City of Henderson
Sep 5, 2012 10:42 PM
70
email
Sep 5, 2012 10:06 PM
71
City of Henderson
Sep 5, 2012 9:48 PM
72
Email
Sep 5, 2012 9:45 PM
73
Thru e-mail
Sep 5, 2012 9:10 PM
74
Email
Sep 5, 2012 9:04 PM
75
email
Sep 5, 2012 7:33 PM
76
E-mailed newsletter from Henderson.
Sep 5, 2012 7:07 PM
77
internet
Sep 5, 2012 6:50 PM
78
City of Henderon Neighborhood Services
Sep 5, 2012 6:50 PM
79
Bicycle website
Sep 5, 2012 5:40 PM
80
city of Henderson neigborhood services
Sep 5, 2012 5:23 PM
71 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q9. How did you find out about this survey? Please check more than one if needed.
81
at work
Sep 5, 2012 4:49 PM
82
E-mail
Sep 5, 2012 4:43 PM
83
email
Sep 5, 2012 4:20 PM
84
City of Henderson
Sep 5, 2012 4:17 PM
85
CoH Email
Sep 5, 2012 4:17 PM
86
emailed to me
Sep 5, 2012 3:49 PM
87
e mail
Sep 5, 2012 3:42 PM
88
email
Sep 5, 2012 2:50 PM
89
email
Sep 5, 2012 2:48 PM
90
Email
Sep 5, 2012 2:33 PM
91
Club ride
Sep 5, 2012 1:58 PM
92
e- mail
Sep 5, 2012 1:49 PM
93
e-mail
Sep 5, 2012 1:27 PM
94
email notice
Sep 5, 2012 1:18 PM
95
email from RTC
Sep 5, 2012 1:08 PM
96
email from RTC
Sep 5, 2012 1:07 PM
97
Direct email
Sep 5, 2012 12:52 PM
98
E-mail was sent to me
Sep 5, 2012 12:45 PM
99
Set to all city of henderson workers by an internal source.
Sep 5, 2012 12:26 PM
100
e-mail
Sep 5, 2012 12:24 PM
101
It was emailed to me.
Sep 5, 2012 12:24 PM
102
E-mail
Sep 5, 2012 12:14 PM
103
email
Sep 5, 2012 12:12 PM
104
emailed from RTC
Sep 5, 2012 12:09 PM
105
e-mail
Sep 5, 2012 12:07 PM
106
E-mail form RTC
Sep 5, 2012 11:54 AM
107
email
Sep 5, 2012 11:05 AM
72 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q9. How did you find out about this survey? Please check more than one if needed.
108
email
Sep 5, 2012 11:03 AM
109
email
Sep 5, 2012 10:50 AM
110
email
Sep 5, 2012 10:44 AM
111
RECEIVED E-MAIL
Sep 5, 2012 10:36 AM
112
you sent me an email
Sep 5, 2012 10:35 AM
113
RTC website notifications
Sep 5, 2012 10:28 AM
114
Email from you
Sep 5, 2012 10:19 AM
115
e-mail
Sep 5, 2012 10:13 AM
116
signed up - maybe through your website? or through request for information.
Sep 5, 2012 10:11 AM
117
Curently enrolled in receiving updates from RTC
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
118
email from RTC
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
119
e-mail
Sep 5, 2012 10:09 AM
120
e-mailed to me.
Sep 5, 2012 10:08 AM
121
E MAILED TO ME
Sep 5, 2012 10:04 AM
122
Email
Sep 5, 2012 10:03 AM
123
Email
Sep 5, 2012 10:03 AM
124
email
Sep 5, 2012 9:59 AM
125
email blast from the RTC
Sep 5, 2012 9:55 AM
126
Email request from [email protected]
Sep 5, 2012 9:53 AM
127
Email
Sep 5, 2012 9:53 AM
128
email
Sep 5, 2012 9:52 AM
129
email
Sep 5, 2012 9:52 AM
130
E-mail
Sep 5, 2012 9:47 AM
131
Information was sent out in the form of an e-mail where I work.
Sep 5, 2012 9:47 AM
132
city e-mail
Sep 5, 2012 9:42 AM
133
email
Sep 5, 2012 7:19 AM
134
email
Sep 5, 2012 6:11 AM
73 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q9. How did you find out about this survey? Please check more than one if needed.
135
City of Henderson employee
Sep 4, 2012 4:47 PM
136
Work email
Sep 4, 2012 4:13 PM
137
Work email
Sep 4, 2012 4:11 PM
138
work
Sep 4, 2012 3:09 PM
139
Email
Sep 4, 2012 1:56 PM
140
Coworker
Sep 4, 2012 1:40 PM
141
Internet
Sep 4, 2012 1:15 PM
142
Provided by my employer.
Sep 4, 2012 12:37 PM
143
AT WORK.
Sep 4, 2012 12:34 PM
144
Email at work
Sep 4, 2012 12:32 PM
145
Sent to me through work email
Sep 4, 2012 12:23 PM
146
email from work peer
Sep 4, 2012 11:40 AM
147
Work e-mail
Sep 4, 2012 11:22 AM
148
Forwarded email
Sep 4, 2012 11:21 AM
149
e-mail through work
Sep 4, 2012 11:06 AM
150
email
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
151
Work Email
Sep 4, 2012 11:03 AM
152
email sent through work ClubRide
Sep 4, 2012 10:44 AM
153
City of Henderson Allusers Email
Sep 4, 2012 10:28 AM
154
City of Henderson work e-mail
Sep 4, 2012 10:26 AM
155
email link at work
Sep 4, 2012 10:21 AM
156
Latin Chamber of Commerce
Sep 4, 2012 10:18 AM
157
Email received at work
Sep 4, 2012 10:10 AM
158
City of Henderson Email (work)
Sep 4, 2012 9:42 AM
159
E-Mail offering survey
Sep 4, 2012 9:40 AM
160
email
Sep 4, 2012 9:29 AM
161
e-mail
Sep 4, 2012 9:28 AM
74 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q9. How did you find out about this survey? Please check more than one if needed.
162
Employer e-mail
Sep 4, 2012 9:23 AM
163
work email
Sep 4, 2012 9:19 AM
164
email
Sep 4, 2012 9:18 AM
165
Work email
Sep 4, 2012 9:18 AM
166
transportation coordinator
Sep 4, 2012 9:18 AM
167
City of Henderson email
Sep 4, 2012 9:12 AM
168
work
Sep 4, 2012 9:09 AM
169
Email
Sep 4, 2012 9:06 AM
170
email to work
Sep 4, 2012 9:05 AM
171
City of Henderson all users email
Sep 4, 2012 9:04 AM
172
Received the mail at work.
Sep 4, 2012 9:03 AM
173
all users work email
Sep 4, 2012 9:03 AM
174
City of Henderson
Sep 4, 2012 9:02 AM
175
work
Sep 4, 2012 9:01 AM
176
E-mail at work
Sep 4, 2012 9:01 AM
177
email at work
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
178
work email
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
179
work
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
180
Internal e-mail in City of Henderson
Sep 4, 2012 9:00 AM
181
email at work
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
182
I was emailed this survey by a co-worker
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
183
WAS EMAILED TO ME AT WORK
Sep 4, 2012 8:58 AM
184
City of Henderson
Sep 4, 2012 8:57 AM
185
Work
Sep 4, 2012 8:56 AM
186
Work email
Sep 4, 2012 8:56 AM
187
Club ride representative at work.
Sep 4, 2012 8:55 AM
188
Email from RTC
Aug 31, 2012 11:42 AM
75 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q9. How did you find out about this survey? Please check more than one if needed.
189
sent to me
Aug 28, 2012 11:25 AM
190
email
Aug 28, 2012 8:28 AM
191
MPS Committee meeting
Aug 24, 2012 4:30 PM
192
99
Aug 23, 2012 2:07 PM
193
Work
Aug 23, 2012 11:21 AM
194
RTC - Operations Sub-committee
Aug 23, 2012 9:32 AM
195
RTC EMAIL SURVEY
Aug 23, 2012 7:48 AM
196
email
Aug 22, 2012 6:08 PM
197
RTC Utility Coordination Committee
Aug 22, 2012 4:31 PM
198
email
Aug 22, 2012 11:20 AM
199
RTC website
Aug 22, 2012 9:20 AM
200
coworker
Aug 21, 2012 2:37 PM
201
email
Aug 21, 2012 11:05 AM
202
Was emailed survey by community colleague
Aug 20, 2012 3:35 PM
203
E-mail from Tina
Aug 20, 2012 8:41 AM
204
At work
Aug 20, 2012 8:24 AM
205
City of Henderon
Aug 20, 2012 8:19 AM
206
Sent to me by the RTC
Aug 19, 2012 1:51 PM
207
Email invite
Aug 19, 2012 8:43 AM
208
Tina Quigley advised me of the survey.
Aug 17, 2012 6:25 PM
209
RJ.com
Aug 17, 2012 5:23 PM
210
email from RTC employee, as I am on the Bus Shelter Advisory Committee
Aug 17, 2012 3:43 PM
211
via e-mail
Aug 17, 2012 3:11 PM
212
RTC website
Aug 17, 2012 12:58 PM
213
I was sent a notice...
Aug 17, 2012 12:54 PM
214
Article at LVRJ.com
Aug 17, 2012 11:13 AM
215
e-mail
Aug 17, 2012 10:42 AM
76 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Q9. How did you find out about this survey? Please check more than one if needed.
216
email
Aug 17, 2012 10:34 AM
217
Really, RJ online so internet version of paper
Aug 17, 2012 10:26 AM
218
BsBAC meeting
Aug 17, 2012 9:51 AM
219
lvrj web site
Aug 17, 2012 8:46 AM
220
website
Aug 17, 2012 8:12 AM
221
RJ Online
Aug 17, 2012 7:20 AM
222
Response to email from RTC
Aug 16, 2012 9:54 PM
223
Email from the RTC
Aug 16, 2012 5:27 PM
224
Member of SNWA/LVVWD who works with RTC occasionally on project
coordination
Aug 16, 2012 4:59 PM
225
email
Aug 16, 2012 4:29 PM
226
email'd to me
Aug 16, 2012 4:22 PM
77 of 77
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Comment
5(*,21$/75$163257$7,21&200,66,212)6287+(511(9$'$
5(*,21$/75$163257$7,21&200,66,212)6287+(511(9$'$
Paul Martin, President – Nevadans for Equal Access
When Metro Max was constructed on North Las Vegas Blvd. it was agreed
that because of cost issues of sidewalks between Lamb and Nellis over
drainage canals they would be added to a later plan. Nowhere on this plan did
I see any mention of sidewalks in this area so individuals would be out of
harms way of vehicles.
Response
However, the projects listed in the RTP and TIP are not exhaustive.
Rather, they are only required to list those projects that utilize federal
transportation funds and/or are Regionally Significant. Regionally
Significant is defined in Federal Regulation to mean a project that is on a
facility which serves regional transportation needs, including, at a
minimum, all principal arterial highways and all fixed guideway transit
facilities that offer a significant alternative to regional highway travel.
Therefore, planned sidewalk improvements that fill system gaps within this
general area, and many others throughout Southern Nevada, may not
necessarily be listed.
The RTC recognizes the existing transportation system is not fully
developed and has placed a priority on filling gaps in the system. On page
82 the RTP states, “In the face of increasing growth pressure and an
existing transportation system that is not fully constructed, the RTC must
also prioritize the completion of the transportation system by identifying and
implementing missing critical links or connections in the transportation
network.” This stated priority includes missing sidewalk connections that
impede non-motorized access to high-quality express transit; similar to the
Las Vegas Blvd. N. MAX/113 route.
RTC staff has incorporated editorial updates into the RTP that were nonsubstantive in nature and did not change the meaning or intent of the RTP.
These minor editorial changes will not be further identified in the Response to
Comments section.
Public Comments Received
Editorial Corrections by RTC Staff
Corrections and clarifications to grammar and syntax were identified
throughout the RTP document. Additionally, the RTP contained various
pictures, maps, and tables that needed higher graphical resolution.
• 5HJLRQDO7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ3ODQ)<
5HJLRQDO7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ3ODQ)<
• 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ,PSURYHPHQW3URJUDP)<
7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ,PSURYHPHQW3URJUDP)<
• 7UDQVLW3URJUDPRI3URMHFWV)<
7UDQVLW3URJUDPRI3URMHFWV)<
5HVSRQVHWR&RPPHQWV
5HVSRQVHWR&RPPHQWV
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
MPS
Item #2
November 13, 2012 Handout
Several of the intersections that are marked by the white makings on the
pavement often do not lead directly to Curb Cuts. Or they are split if the
intersection has a center concrete divider. This is a dangerous barrier for
individuals who are sight impaired.
$33(1',;WRWKH5(*,21$/75$163257$7,213/$1
WKH5(*,21$/75$163257$7,213/$1
$33(1',;WR
WKH5(*,21$/75$163257$7,213/$1
Moving beyond what is required by the MUTCD, the RTC strives to ensure
a safe, efficient and equitable multi-modal transportation system for all
users. This effort is highlighted by the RTC’s Complete Streets Initiative,
which the RTP references and builds upon for the selection of projects.
Information on the RTC’s Complete Streets Initiative can be found at:
http://www.rtcsnv.com/planning-engineering/rtc-projects/complete-streets-
All reconstructed or newly installed roadway devices and markings must
conform to the most recent MUTCD provisions. The MUTCD is the
national standard for all traffic control devices and markings installed on
any street, highway, or bicycle trail open to public travel.
“Off-site improvements may also include enhancements to the existing
adjacent sidewalk network to accommodate and facilitate business
access.”
Pavement markings and their placement within the roadway are governed
by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) published by
the Federal Highway Administration. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
standards, which are administered by the U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ), are developed in coordination with MUTCD requirements to ensure
consistency and avoid redundancy.
However, the statement above focuses on new roadways constructed in
connection with greenfield development; not on infill development or the
revitalization of existing buildings in more urbanized areas. Therefore, the
following language has been added to Page 123 of the RTP:
Response
The RTP discusses the role of transportation improvements completed in
conjunction with private land use development. Page 123 states, “Property
developers make significant contributions to the construction of local
roadways. Right-of-way dedications and the construction of half-street
improvements are typically required as a condition of property
improvements and new development. Major road improvements are often
negotiated as part of development agreements and may be required as
part of Special Improvement Districts or similar local ordinances. As public
funding for street improvements becomes scarcer, it is reasonable to
assume that private developers will continue to fund most of the needed
roadway construction in new developments.”
Comment
Charleston Blvd. while being mostly older buildings has been neglected in
being updated especially from East of Pecos/Palm to Main Street. As this
area is older it is seeing signs of new construction and remodel of existing
buildings access on the sidewalks is becoming more and more important.
Curb Cuts need updating, repaving of certain area's has left high ridges that
are impossible for mobility devices to challenge. Area's with no sidewalks
leave businesses inaccessible especially around the Charleston / Fremont
corner.
Public Comments Received
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
5(*,21$/75$163257$7,21&200,66,212)6287+(511(9$'$
5(*,21$/75$163257$7,21&200,66,212)6287+(511(9$'$
Dan Bunke – City of Yakima, WA
Great transit service. Transports people well from location to location; does
the job well. Could be a little more inexpensive rather than as expensive as
transportation exists to help.
Sidewalks from Fremont / Main going South from the Plaza Hotel Casino
towards Bonneville do not allow access wide enough for larger full size
mobility devices. Several Curb Cuts are not within standards even though
Public Works Department deem them as being SAFE.
There are still neighborhoods throughout Clark County that have not been
brought up to ADA Standards for Curb Cuts. These area's especially older
neighborhoods have a lot of residents who are now getting older and require
use of mobility devices are being forced into the streets because the Public
Works departments have not been allocated the funds and direction to bring
Clark County up to code.
Comment
Response
This comment was transmitted to the RTC Transit division.
The RTC recognizes the role of enhancing livability by maintaining and
expanding affordable travel options, including public transit. Page 74 of the
RTP identifies a future goal for Southern Nevada’s transportation system to
be one that “is affordable, operates efficiency, offers a choice of transportation
modes, and supports a vibrant economy.”
This comment was transmitted to the City of Las Vegas.
As funding for these project activities becomes available, newly
constructed and altered roadway facilities must comply with ADA by being
readily accessible and usable by people with disabilities. DOJ also
requires state and local entities to comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines, developed by the U.S.
Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access
Board).
The RTP identifies the regionally significant “Main St/Commerce St from Las
Vegas Blvd to Owens: One way complete streets couplet” project that will
improve sidewalks, widths and associated curb cuts on Main St., including a
portion north of Bonneville Avenue. This project is listed on pages 19 and 114
of the RTP, and a visual simulation of the project is included on page 68.
initiative/
Page 59 of the RTP identifies a primary goal of optimizing the performance
of the existing transportation system by prioritizing maintenance and
preservation activities, safety projects, and Complete Streets treatments.
Public Comments Received
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Comment
It is a waste of money to build a bus station at UNLV. I work there and do not
want buses on campus and do not like you taking out a parking lot. Students
will not/cannot ride the bus because of the way they commute to school and
jobs.
Terry West – City of Las Vegas
The intersecting roads at 215 and 95 North area a real problem and have
been for years. There is no good way to get from they "y" on Buffalo to the
Centennial Shopping Center. Of all the projects, this should be at the top of
your list.
Maria Barr – City of Henderson
We need 24 hour bus in Lake Mead, and bus to go to Lake Las Vegas too
because there is not a bus.
Response
$33(1',;WRWKH5(*,21$/75$163257$7,213/$1
WKH5(*,21$/75$163257$7,213/$1
$33(1',;WR
WKH5(*,21$/75$163257$7,213/$1
Improvements to the U.S. 95/CC 215 Northern Beltway interchange are
included in the fiscally constrained RTP. The 3 packages that comprise the
phase 3 interchange improvements are listed in both the RTP Executive
Summary on page 16 and in the main RTP document on page 108. These
improvements will improve interchange access and mobility on U.S. 95, CC
215 and surrounding roadways. The phase 3 interchange improvements will
be constructed as a partnership between NDOT, Clark County and the City of
Las Vegas.
The RTC completed the comprehensive “UNLV Multimodal Transportation
Hub Feasibility Study” in June 2009. The complete study can be found on the
RTC website at:
http://www.rtcsnv.com/mpo/plansstudies/Docs/UNLV%20Multi-
Improvements to the entire U.S. 95 corridor in the Northwest Las Vegas
Valley are a priority for the RTC. Improvements to the U.S. 95/CC 215
Northern Beltway interchange are currently identified by NDOT as phase 3 of
a larger 5 phase improvement project on the U.S. 95 corridor from
Washington Avenue to Kyle Canyon Road.
This comment was transmitted to the RTC Transit division.
The RTP identifies and discusses numerous transportation funding
challenges. Specifically related to public transit, page 34 of the RTP
states, “The problem with transit is that operating costs are growing faster
than inflation and any substantial new service would only exacerbate the
problem. The Plan therefore assumes every effort will be made to maintain
the existing system but only limited new service is envisaged.”
The current bus on E. Lake Mead Pkwy (Route 217) operates within the
vicinity of Lake Las Vegas, serving Mohawk Drive, which is approximately 3
miles southwest of Lake Las Vegas. This is not a “24-hour Service” route and
does not operate during late night or early morning hours.
As of September 30, 2012, the RTC operates 12 fixed-transit routes on a
designated “24-hour Service” schedule. Other routes provide some service
during late nights or early mornings, but not on an officially designated “24hour Service” schedule.
Public Comments Received
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
5(*,21$/75$163257$7,21&200,66,212)6287+(511(9$'$
5(*,21$/75$163257$7,21&200,66,212)6287+(511(9$'$
Judy Smith
I am simply AMAZED that there are no RTC busses that go to McCarran
International Airport! When I tried to map out a route to reach my friend's
house in North Las Vegas, I have to walk 1.3 miles to the Tropicana to catch a
bus?! I have no problem walking, but to have a major airport with no bus or
light rail transport directly to/from speaks like someone is paying someone $$
to keep it out. And have you ever attempted walking from the airport to
ANYWHERE? I have and there is no safe pedestrian walkway. Again, I am
non-plussed.
RTC Transit
The following changes to the transit program are requested by the RTC:
•
Project # 2855 CATSTAR Worksite Transportation: change Job
Access and Reverse Commute amount to $180,169 in FY2013;
Kathleen Kahr – City of Las Vegas
Enjoy the increased aspect of cycling coming from the RTC. Would like to see
more "stop light" crosswalks like the one on Sahara west of Maryland. The
crosswalk at 1st Street and Charleston is an accident waiting to happen.
Comment
Response
The changes have been incorporated into the 2013-20135 Regional
Transportation Plan, the 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program,
and the 2013 Transit Program of Projects.
The RTC currently operates two transit routes to McCarran International
Airport; the Westcliff Airport Express (WAX) and route 109. The WAX
provides service to the Bonneville Transit Center (BTC) and route 109
services both the BTC and the South Strip Transfer Terminal. Connections
throughout the Las Vegas Valley, including to the City of North Las Vegas,
are available at these transit centers.
Pages 61 and 62 of the RTP discuss the newly installed High-Intensity
Activated crossWalK (HAWK) signal on Sahara Avenue and 15th Street.
This signal was installed in 2012 as a component of the larger Sahara
Express Bus Rapid Transit improvement project. The RTC FAST division
is currently evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the HAWK signal in
Southern Nevada. National research has indicated safety benefits
resulting from increased motorist compliance compared to a traditional, unsignalized non-motorized crossing. After an evaluation of the HAWK
signal’s performance, the RTC will potentially identify the most appropriate
locations for additional HAWK signal deployment.
Preliminary planning, engineering design, and construction of the UNLV
transit hub are consistent with the implementation plan identified in the
feasibility study. Construction funding for the project was included in the
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for years FY 2011-2014 and is
included in the new TIP for years 2013-2016. The UNLV transit center efforts
have been coordinated with and supported by the University.
The feasibility study included an analysis of existing conditions, existing transit
utilization in the UNLV study area, project purpose and need, identification of
site alternatives, traffic and circulation studies, a locally preferred site location,
identification of opportunities and constraints, transit hub designs, cost
estimates, and extensive public outreach activities.
Modal%20Transit%20Hub%20Feasibility%20Study_2009.pdf
Public Comments Received
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Comment
change RTC sales tax amount to $180,169 in FY2013.
•
Project # 2856 Aid for AIDS of Nevada ‘BUDDY’ Transportation
System: change New Freedom amount to $5,000 in FY2013; change
local funds amount to $5,000 in FY2013.
•
Project # 2861 Jewish Federation of Las Vegas (vouchers): change
New Freedom amount to $5,000 in FY2013; change local funds
amount to $5,000 in FY2013.
•
Project # 2862 Jewish Federation of Las Vegas (rural/urban transit
partnership): change New Freedom amount to $5,000 in FY2013;
change local funds to $5,000 in FY2013.
•
Project #2872 Opportunity Village (purchase vans): change local
funds to $45,122 in FY2013.
•
Project #2873 Southern Nevada (provide transit service): remove
project and $10,556 in project costs.
•
Project #2790 Flamingo Rd. (Bus Rapid Transit): add the project to
the Travel Demand Model.
City of Las Vegas Public Works Department
The following changes to the project list are requested by the City of Las
Vegas:
rd
•
Project # 5062 3 Street bicycle and pedestrian improvements
between Carson Ave and Garces Ave: Change project limits from
Garces Ave. to Charleston Blvd
•
Project # 2776 Buffalo Dr Intersection Improvements from
Charleston Blvd to Sahara Ave: Add “and bus turnouts” to the
project description.
•
Project # 5049 Las Vegas Blvd from Stewart Ave to Sahara Ave:
Add $500,000 in STP Clark County in FY2014.
•
Project # 1579 Rainbow Blvd: Change the project in the Travel
Demand Model to reflect the current scope. Also, change Question
10 Funding to to $1,200,00 in FY2013 and $2,000,000 in FY2014.
•
Project # 4147 Martin Luther King Blvd./Industrial Rd. Connector:
Remove project. This NDOT project is duplicative of the Las Vegas
project # 5022.
•
Project #5022 Martin Luther King Blvd./Industrial Rd. Connector:
Add “and landscaping within the limits of Project Neon” to the project
description. Change STP Clark County amount to $9,615,000 in
FY2014.
Response
$33(1',;WRWKH5(*,21$/75$163257$7,213/$1
WKH5(*,21$/75$163257$7,213/$1
$33(1',;WR
WKH5(*,21$/75$163257$7,213/$1
The modifications to the scope of the Rainbow project (# 1579), which
entailed changing the number of proposed general purpose lanes to
accommodate alternative modes of transportation, represented a change to
a regionally significant project. The project was reconfigured in the Travel
Demand Model and the Air Quality Conformity Model was rerun to ensure
the project did not adversely affect the air quality conformity determination.
The other changes proposed by the City of Las Vegas to the model
network were incorporated.
The only change not incorporated at this time is the recommended addition
of STP Enhancement funds to the Oakey Blvd. bicycle lane project (project
# 5081). A prioritization process conducted in 2012 identified this project to
receive funding between 2014 and 2016. However, the Enhancement
program has changed as a result of federal regulations and any projects
beyond FY2013 will be re-evaluated to receive Transportation Alternative
funding at a future date
The changes have been incorporated into the 2013-20135 Regional
Transportation Plan and the 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement
Program.
The Flamingo BRT was added to the Travel Demand Model and the Air
Quality Conformity Model was rerun to ensure the project did not adversely
affect the air quality conformity determination.
Public Comments Received
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
Comment
Project # 5081 Oakey Blvd. Bicycle lanes from Torrey Pines Dr. to
Western Ave: Add $1,000,000 in STP Enhancement in FY2015.
Project # 5027 Rancho Drive widening from Bonanza Rd. to
Rainbow Blvd: Add $500,000 in STP Clark County in FY2014.
Project # 894 Summerlin Pkwy from CC-215 Western Beltway to US
95: Change Question 10 Funding to $50,000 in FY2013.
Various corrections to the network of the Travel Demand Model.
5(*,21$/75$163257$7,21&200,66,212)6287+(511(9$'$
5(*,21$/75$163257$7,21&200,66,212)6287+(511(9$'$
•
•
•
•
Public Comments Received
Response
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4176060B-1EC4-4854-82EA-EBB15AA58CBA