A Methodology Guide United Kingdom collaborative clinical audit of health care for children and young people with suspected epileptic seizures Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Version 2.1 January 2011 1 Introduction and Ethos This guide aims to outline the chosen methodology and process for Epilepsy12. This guide should you understand how the project will work and some of the rationale behind the methodology. The audit ethos is: to facilitate and resource local audit to be both practical and meaningful to consider results for services as a whole rather than individuals to enable local epilepsy services and networks to ‘own their own data’ and prioritise ‘their own strategies’ to evolve and improve to provide data regarding quality of care against national recommendations with the ability to compare results to other cohorts in a standardised way. that league tables are not a meaningful way to represent the audit’s results to strengthen roles and relationships within existing epilepsy networks to learn from the audit process such that the audit strategy evolves over time What are the aims of the audit? 1. To facilitate health providers and commissioners to measure and improve quality of care for children and young people with seizures and epilepsies. 2. To contribute to the continuing improvement of outcomes for those children, young people and their families. Which services in the UK are eligible to participate? The audit will examine care across the whole UK including England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. All paediatric services that employ NHS paediatricians that request EEGs and are involved with the care of children and young people with seizures or epilepsy are invited to participate. The audit will be conducted principally around hospital and community services functioning at a secondary tier level. For hospitals with tertiary roles it will be any secondary care aspects within their service that will be the main focus of the audit. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Version 2.1 January 2011 2 What is an ‘audit unit’? The UK is divided into defined 200 ‘audit units’ which are based on existing clinical networks, affiliations and pathways of care that form 20 “audit regions” across the UK. Each audit unit will have a defined ‘link Paediatrician’ and component paediatric services. Most audit units will comprise groupings of both hospital and community paediatric services. Each audit unit is linked with one or more tertiary paediatric services with whom it has developed pathways of care. Each tertiary service has a defined lead or ‘link paediatric neurologist’. When will the audit begin? The audit is being undertaken over a 3 year period which began in 2009 and comprises several phases. The start date for 21 early adopters audit units is January 2011 using the 1st February as the census date. The start and census date for the rest of the UK is 1st May 2011. What is census day? This is the key point in time defined by the project team which determines when an audit unit can become ‘live’ via the web tool and begin to enter data. It is the date which is considered by the audit unit team when describing attributes of the audit unit’s services. It also determines the various dates which identify the target cohort for the audit. All children and young people included in the audit will have presented to paediatric service at least 12 months prior to census day. The census day for ‘early adopter’ audit units will be 1st February 2011. The census day for the rest of the UK will be 1st May 2011. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Version 2.1 January 2011 3 What is being measured? The audit will allow the audit unit to measure quality of care in three separate domains. 1. Service Descriptors 2. Clinical audit and Performance Indicators 3. User Experience 1. Service Descriptors Each audit unit lead will complete a service descriptor questionnaire via the web tool to describe the epilepsy service within their audit unit as it was on census day. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Version 2.1 January 2011 4 2. Clinical Audit and Performance Indicators The web tool will prompt the clinical audit process which may be undertaken by a number of professionals from within the audit unit. a) The audit unit will generate a letter to the relevant EEG department asking for their help in identifying all children and young people referred from their services for an EEG within the defined 12 month time period. b) The audit unit will filter these patients by application of inclusion and exclusion criteria to establish the target cohort. c) Case notes for the target cohort will be analysed by the audit unit and relevant questions answered for each patient. Inclusion criteria: First EEG during defined 12 month period. The child has a ‘first paediatric assessment’ for the ‘paroxysmal episode or episodes’ during defined 6 month time period. Child is older than 1 month and younger than 16 years at ‘first paediatric assessment’. The EEG was prompted by the patient having one or more afebrile paroxysmal episodes. Exclusion criteria: All ‘paroxysmal episodes’ in question were diagnosed as ‘febrile seizures’. The patient has had a paediatric assessment previously for similar episode or episodes or epilepsy prior to first paediatric assessment All the paroxysmal episodes that the patient had were acute symptomatic seizures or occurred within a week of a traumatic head injury The patient’s care was permanently transferred to a secondary paediatric service outside the ‘audit unit’ boundaries or an adult service during the year after first paediatric assessment 3. User Experience Audit units will be supported such that an anonymous user experience survey is undertaken: a) A cohort will be identified for each audit unit. This will be all children and young people commenced on regular anti epilepsy drugs and not deceased. b) A paper questionnaire and cover letter will be sent to each family by the audit unit team. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Version 2.1 January 2011 5 c) Anonymous questionnaires will be returned in pre-paid envelope to the RCPCH project team or questionnaire answered online. Who will carry out the audit? The audit will be led at local level by the audit unit ‘link Paediatrician’. For those taking part it should feel like a typical departmental audit except that the audit is supported by a web tool and central RCPCH team. The audit is constructed such that the audit unit lead can choose to nominate other professionals to take part. For example, the audit department may help with ascertainment, junior doctors may help with case note review and a departmental secretary may help with the user experience questionnaire. It is likely that different units will achieve the audit in different ways depending on local arrangements. The audit will be supported centrally by the RCPCH Epilepsy12 project team throughout the three year project. How will the web tool work? The web tool has been designed specifically to support the Epilepsy12 audit project. Defined health professionals within each audit unit will be given individual access rights to their audit unit within the web tool. The web tool will support many aspects of the audit and the majority of data collection will be done through online forms. Help will be available to support this process. Will patient identifiable information be collected? The audit has exemption from section 251 of the NHS Act 2006 (formally section 60) which has been granted by the National Information Governance Board (formerly PIAG). Users will be asked to submit the child’s NHS number and date of birth into the web tool. These will be encrypted upon entry. Where will the data be stored and how will it be secured? Data will be stored and held securely in compliance with Data Protection and Caldicott Guardian principles. Only users registered with audit will be able to enter data and will only be able to so through the use of a unique username and password. Further data security policies are available from the project team. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Version 2.1 January 2011 6 What are the 12 performance indicators? This is the term given to defined quality parameters determined from the clinical questionnaire. Each performance indicator (PI) correlates with specific SIGN and NICE recommendations and has a defined method of calculation. We are encouraging services to examine their own scores alongside other provider’s scores. It may not be optimal for a service to score 100% as patients and circumstances differ and not all children fit with all models of care. Target standards will not be set in this audit cycle. There are 12 performance indicators: 1. % with evidence of input by Paediatrician with expertise in Epilepsy by 1 year. 2. % with evidence of input by, or referral to, an Epilepsy Specialist Nurse by 1 year. 3. % diagnosed epileptic seizures meeting referral criteria with evidence of referral to or discussion with a Paediatric Neurologist by 1 year. 4. % with evidence of appropriate clinical assessment at first paediatric assessment. 5. % with a diagnosis of epilepsy maintained by 1 year. 6. % diagnosed as epilepsy with evidence of seizure classification by 1 year. 7. % diagnosed as epilepsy with evidence of epilepsy classification by 1 year. 8. % having ‘appropriate’ EEG. 9. % with epilepsy and indications for neuroimaging having neuroimaging by 1 year 10. % with convulsive seizures having 12 lead ECG by 1 year. 11. % females >12 years old commenced on epilepsy medication with evidence of discussion regarding pregnancy or contraception related issues. 12. % commenced on carbamazepine with absence of contraindications for carbamazepine. How were the performance indicators chosen? The Epilepsy12 team selected meaningful measures that can be mapped to NICE and SIGN with a clear rationale. These act as broad indicators of good practice and can be reasonably defined and achieved by the methodology of retrospective case note analysis. How is misdiagnosis being considered? The Epilepsy12 team has considered how to obtain a measure of misdiagnosis using a retrospective case note methodology. The chosen approach is different from actual misdiagnosis rates. To measure misdiagnosis in a gold standard way would need independent clinical review for each child. This is impractical and not appropriate for what Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Version 2.1 January 2011 7 is intended. The Epilepsy12 national audit will explore "whether there was any documented evidence of withdrawal of diagnosis of epilepsy by 12 months after first paediatric assessment". Will there be ‘league tables’? ‘League tables’ will be considered as an inappropriate and non-meaningful approach to displaying results. Will audit unit’s results be published? In the long term all audit unit’s data will be available within the public domain. What will happen if an audit unit has difficulties completing the audit? It is hoped that all paediatric services within the UK will participate in the audit. The project team will provide support to audit units in order to help them undertake the three domains. It is acknowledged that not all audit units may achieve participation and complete all three audit domains. Degree of participation and data completeness will be reported for all participating and non-participating audit units. Is the audit measuring clinical outcomes? Epilepsy outcomes are difficult to measure objectively within the current health service structures and methodology of the Epilepsy12 audit. Meaningful outcomes measurements are particularly difficult in epilepsies as they are a heterogeneous group of long term conditions with a wide and varied impact beyond just their seizure component. Clinical outcomes based on ‘syndrome specific seizure freedom rates’ are being piloted within the clinical domain of this audit. Where can I find out more? The RCPCH project team can be contacted throughout the project: Rita Ranmal, Project Manager Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 5-11 Theobalds Road, London, WC1X 8SH Tel: 020 7092 6167. Email: [email protected] Go to www.rcpch.ac.uk/epilepsy12 for ongoing further information regarding the project. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Version 2.1 January 2011 8
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz