School to work transitions in a changing labour market: Implications for schools and colleges: How The Youth market Has Changed? Department of Education/Education Employers Taskforce 03.02.2017 Hugh Lauder - University of Bath SRHE Conference-7 December, 2011 Celtic Manor An outline of the trends Previous policy and theoretical understandings: The Knowledge Economy Human Capital Theory What has changed? What can be done about it? We tend to see the youth labour market in segments or sectors which relate to education’s institutional structure: Universities – graduate jobs. Colleges of Education – skilled work through to apprenticeships. Apprenticeships Semi and unskilled work. Start with some data: In the USA 52 per cent of four year college graduates are in jobs that match their skills while 48 per cent are overqualified. over 5 million college graduates are in jobs that require less than high school education. (Vedder et al, 2013) The ONS report that underemployment amongst graduates has risen from 37 per cent in 2001 to 47 per cent in June 2013. In Europe Holmes and Mayhew, show that graduate underutilisation is ‘widespread but varies between countries’ If graduates are underemployed then what of other young people in the same cohort? One hypothesis is that there is a ‘bumping down’ effect. As graduates cannot get what were traditionally judged as graduate jobs so they have entered fields where nongraduates were normally employed. (e.g., estate agents). At the same time undergraduates undertake casual low wage labour (bar tenders, baristas). This means that less qualified youth are bumped out of the labour market –hence lower skilled youth employment. It is assumed in the mainstream economic literature, in human capital and skill bias theory that the solution to the problem is to emphasise upskilling young people. The assumption of the knowledge economy. We may wish to do that but not for the reasons assumed. In order to understand why tried and tested policies will no longer work, we need to look at the broad historical trends. The question is: do we live in a knowledge economy? Human Capital theory would predict that the more educated workers are, the more productive they are and hence their incomes will rise. When we look at the OECD (2014) they make this statement: The economies of OECD countries depend on a sufficient supply of high-skilled workers. Educational qualifications are frequently used to measure human capital and the level of an individual’s skills. In most OECD countries people with high qualifications have the highest employment rates. At the same time, people with the lowest educational qualifications are at greater risk of being unemployed. Given the technological advances that have been transforming the needs of the global labour market, people with higher or specific skills are in strong demand (102) Some leading skill bias theorists claim that we are seeing a temporary halt in high skill jobs but that there will be a demand for some intermediate skilled jobs. David Autor (2015) responding to the threat of robots, says: The primary system of income distribution in market economies is rooted in labor scarcity; citizens possess (or acquire) a bundle of valuable ‘human capital’ that, due to its scarcity, generates a flow of income over the career path. (p.28). He understands the stakes are high for: ‘If machines were in fact to make human labor superfluous, we would have vast aggregate wealth but a serious challenge in determining who owns it and how to share it…Are we actually on the verge of throwing off the yoke of scarcity so that our primary economic challenge soon becomes one of distribution?’ (p.28). Autor is already behind the curve! In ‘The Global Auction’ Phil Brown and I describe the some of the processes which explain the trends we have observed. There is a global auction for high skilled jobs in which those who are cheapest often win. There are processes of standardising, digitising and exporting what was once high skilled knowledge work –digital Taylorism. Now high skilled work that was once exported –discovery work in law as well has smart factories –Adidas no longer needs labour, however low the wages. There are national variations in the youth labour market and unemployment in the UK is in part a function of the retention of older workers but this is to miss the macro trends outlined. The knowledge economy was an inaccurate imaginary that stripped out capitalism and the drive to reduce labour costs and reified technology. In a highly uncertain labour market education becomes more important not less! There will be those who will seek to cut education budgets dramatically, with appaling consequences. We need citizens who can understand the possibilities of ‘other worlds’ that can be derived through academic disciplines and high quality vocational education. While the dual system in Germany is under threat, we should note that approx. 50% of graduates move to different ‘professions’. Their vocational education gives them a launch pad. The point is now well understood, we need a basic income. And it is appearing in political debates across the globe: Because of the lack of demand for skilled work Technology - The robots! It reduces transfer costs. It encourages initiative. And would enable carers to live with dignity. A gender argument. But a basic income, even if it genuinely covered a living wage –we are far from that, is not enough. We need lifelong learning to enable citizens to seize opportunities within a different conception of the labour market. Thank you!
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz