A Holistic Visual "Wheel of Relationships" in Production Theory Alexandra Naumenko*, [email protected] Seyyed Ali Zeytoon Nejad Moosavian*, [email protected] *. Ph.D. Students in Economics, Department of Economics, North Carolina State University Abstract: Production theory in advanced microeconomics Symbols and Notations: comprises two intricate optimization problems: cost minimization and profit maximization. The cost minimization problem essentially involves deriving conditional factor demand functions and the cost function. The profit maximization problem involves deriving the output supply function, the profit function, and unconditional factor demand functions. Additionally, there are numerous mathematical equations in the setting of production theory which aid us in deriving each of the mentioned functions from another. These include Shephard’s lemma, Hotelling’s lemmas, direct and indirect mathematical relations, and other mathematical elements. All of these elements contribute to forming a neat wheel of relationships in production theory. However, these complexities and unseen, underlying linkages can bring about difficulties for both instructors to teach as well as students to learn the material. Much of this complexity has its root in the intricacies inherent in the mathematical theory of duality. The primary purpose of this poster is to illuminate these theoretical complexities through a holistic visual wheel of relationships in production theory in order to ease the teaching and learning of advanced production theory. More specifically, this poster introduces two instructional visuals which can be used as complementary teaching tools to demonstrate the connections between the profit-maximization and cost-minimization problems as well as other components of production theory in modern microeconomics. This visual clarification also allows for easier elaboration of three notions of optimality which must exist in any economic production system, i.e. technical optimality, allocative optimality, and scale optimality. The focus of the present poster is on the two extreme market structures: perfect competition and monopoly. max: Maximize min: Minimize s.t.: Subject to x: Vector of Input Quantities W: Vector of Input Prices y: Firm’s Output Quantity (in general and also for a price-taking firm) Y: Market Output Quantity (in general sense and also for a monopolistic firm) C(W,x): Cost Relation (OR, the Amount of Cost) y=f(x): Production Function xC (W,y): Vector of Conditional Factor Demands (conditional on output) C(W,y): “The” Cost Function (OR, total cost function, i.e. TC) AC: Average Cost Function AVC: Average Variable Cost Function MC: Marginal Cost Function Zero-Profit Point: The point at which AC=MC Shutdown Point: The point at which AVC=MC PZero-Profit: The price corresponding to the Zero-Profit point PShutdown: The price corresponding to the Shutdown point PPC: The optimal price for a perfectly competitive firm PMON: The optimal price for a monopolistic firm yZP: The output level corresponding to the Zero-Profit point ySD: The output level corresponding to the Shutdown point y*PC: The optimal quantity for a perfectly competitive firm y*MON: The optimal quantity for a monopolistic firm π(P,W,y): Profit Relation for a perfectly competitive firm π(P(Y),W,Y): Profit Relation for a monopolistic firm, which finally reduces to π(W,Y) TR: Total Revenue which equals P.Y for a perfectly competitive firm and P(Y).Y for a monopolistic firm AR: Average Revenue MR: Marginal Revenue y*(P,W): Output Schedule or Supply Function for a perfectly competitive firm P: Output Price for a perfectly competitive firm P(Y): Inverse Demand Function for the output produced by a monopolistic firm Y*(W): Output quantity schedule in terms of input prices for a monopolistic firm P*(W): Output price schedule in terms of input prices for a monopolistic firm XU (W,y): Unconditional Factor Demand for a perfectly competitive firm XU (W): Unconditional Factor Demand for a monopolistic firm Π(P,W): “The” Profit Function for a perfectly competitive firm, in which everything is in terms of prices Π(W): “The” Profit Function for a monopolistic firm Figure 1) Spectrum of Firm Types and Market Structures Number of Firms in the Market 1 2 ∞ … Towards More Market Power Towards More Competition Monopolistic Competition Imperfect Competition Duopoly Monopoly Perfect Competition Intermediate Cases (which involve strategic interactions): Studied Based on the Conventional Microeconomic Analysis as Well as Game-Theoretic Analyses Two Polar Cases (Extreme Cases): Studied Based on the Conventional Microeconomic Analysis Figure 3) Wheel of Relationships in Production Theory (Case of Perfect Competition) Figure 2) Wheel of Relationships in Production Theory (Case of Monopoly) Cost Minimization: Profit Maximization: Cost Minimization: Profit Maximization: A General Story Applicable to Any Type of Firms in Any Markets A Specific Story Applicable to a Monopolistic Firm A General Story Applicable to Any Type of Firms in Any Markets A Specific Story Applicable to a Price-Taking, ProfitMaximizing Firm in a Perfectly Competitive Market s.t. y=f(x) Invert x (W , y ) c Constrained Minimization Through Lagrangian 𝒙 𝒎𝒂𝒙 π(P(Y),W,Y) = P(Y).Y − C(W,Y) 𝒀 Cost, Rev. & Price 𝒙 𝒎𝒊𝒏C(W,x)=W.x PMON AC to get W ( x c , y ) C (W , x) C (W ( x c , y ), y )) xC (W,y) Invert Y*(W) to get W(Y) Work with Π(W)=TR(W)-TC(W) Substitute W(Y) into TR(W) to get the TR(Y) MC D=AR=P Unconstrained Maximization term of π(W,Y) Substitute W(Y) into TC(W) to get TC(Y), MR YMON P*(W) 𝒚 Invert x c (W , y ) Constrained Minimization Through Lagrangian to get W ( x c , y ) C (W , x) P*(W)=P(Y*(W)) AC PPC Unconstrained Maximization D=AR=P=MR y*PC Invert y*(P,W) for each of its arguments Substitute W(y.P) into the TR term of Π(P,W) C (W ( x , y ), y )) Substitute P(y.W) into the TC term of Π(P,W) Output (y) xC (W,y) xU (W) Y*(W) MC c then using W(Y) write TC(W) as W.h(Y), which is the cost function, to get the complete π(W,Y) Output (Y) 𝒎𝒂𝒙 π(P,W,y) = P.y − C(W,y) s.t. y=f(x) Cost, Rev. & Price 𝒎𝒊𝒏C(W,x)=W.x y*(P,W) xU (P,W) xc (W,y*(P,W)) = xU (P,W) xc (W,Y*(W)) = xU (W) C (W , y ) C (W , x c (W , y )) C (W , y ) Shephard’s W i Lemma xic (W , y ) OR C (W , y ) W .x (W , y ) c AC AVC MC x (W ) U i Point MC AC PZero-Profit AVC PShutdown Shutdown ( P, W ) ( P,W , y * ( P,W )) Hotelling’s Lemma ( P, W ) P y * ( P, W ) ( P, W ) Hotelling’s Wi Lemma xU ( P , W ) i Π(P,W) = P.y*(P,W) - C(W,y*(P,W)) Zero-Profit Point MC AC AVC Shutdown Point Created By: Alexandra Naumenko ([email protected]) Ali Zeytoon Nejad ([email protected]) ySD yZP Output (y) Figure 4) The Process of Determining the Potential Market Outcomes Firm and Market Types Perfect Competition: A Price-Taking, ProfitMaximizing Firm in a Perfectly Competitive Market Identify • the setting of the markets • and the type of the firm xic (W , y ) C(W,y) PZero-Profit Point Problem and Context Identification Lemma C (W , y ) W .x c (W , y ) AC AVC MC Zero-Profit C (W , y ) Shephard’s Wi OR Cost & Price Cost & Price Hotelling’s Lemma for Monopoly (W ) Wi Π(W) = P*(W).Y*(W) - C(W,Y*(W)) C(W,y) PShutdown (W ) ( P * (W ),W , Y * (W )) C (W , y ) C (W , x c (W , y )) Monopoly: A Price-Determining, ProfitMaximizing Firm in a Monopolistic Output Market Inputs to the Theory • Production function form “y=f(x)” • Input prices “W” Our Black Box (Cost and Production Theory) Technical Optimality Cost and Production Theory • Production function form “y=f(x)” • Input prices “W” • Inverse demand function for output “P(Y)” Figure 5) Three Notions of Optimality in Production Theory (Physical) Outputs of the Theory • When to shutdown in SR/LR • Optimal Output OR Optimal Scale of Production (y*) • Optimal input (x*) • Maximized amount of profit • Output market price “P” ySD yZP Output (y) Technical Optimality (Input) Allocative Optimality (Π*) Technical Optimality Cost and Production Theory • Optimal Output OR Optimal Scale of Production (Y*) • Optimal input (x*) • Optimal output price (P*) • Maximized amount of profit (Π*) (Output) Scale/Size Optimality Created By: Alexandra Naumenko ([email protected]) Ali Zeytoon Nejad ([email protected])
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz