2014 Water Report Card Executive Summary Save the Harbor / Save the Bay’s annual Boston Harbor Region Beach Water Quality Report Card is based on an in-depth analysis of thousands of samples taken by the DCR and the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) in 2013. The samples were collected at 34 testing sites on public beaches in 9 communities including Nahant, Lynn, Revere, Winthrop, East Boston, South Boston, Dorchester, Quincy and Hull. The report card is based on methodology developed by the Save the Harbor/Save the Bay’s Beaches Advisory Committee (BSAC), Co-Chaired by Dr. Judy Pederson of MIT’s Sea Grant Program and Dr. Jim Shine of the Harvard School of Public Health. Water Quality Save the Harbor uses quantitative metrics for assessing beach water quality and management at the Boston Harbor region beaches. Enterococcus is the current microbial indicator of GI illness used in marine waters, as established by the EPA. To assess and compare the water quality and conditions on each beach, we looked at the percentage of test samples exceeding the state swimming standard of 104 colony forming units (cfu) of Enterococcus/100 ml of water. This metric is called “Beach Safety,” and is a metric that is independent of the flagging program. Another indicator of water quality is the geometric mean (GM). The GM indicates the central tendency of a set of numbers from the product of their values. For our analysis, we calculated the GM based on bacterial exceedance values from the previous five days without rain. A GM of 35 cfu/100 ml or greater is considered statistically significant in water quality analysis, and is included with bacterial exceedances when determining Overall Beach Safety. The total number of samples collected varies across these beaches, as some are sampled weekly and others are sampled daily throughout the swimming season. Also, beaches vary in the number of sampling locations; some have only one location whereas others have as many as four. The summer of 2013 was a relatively wet season, with 6 days exceeding 1 inch marker of rain at Boston Logan Airport’s rain gauge. Rainfall measured at Logan during the swimming season of 2013 was significantly higher than the rainfall amount of 2012, with 20.88 inches vs. 12.24 inches respectively. Beach Flagging and Management The metrics for assessing Beach Management with the Flagging Program include Sensitivity, Positive Predictive Efficiency, Specificity, Negative Predictive Efficiency, and Overall Predictive Efficiency. Sensitivity tells us when the beach is not safe for swimming, what fraction of the time the beach is correctly labeled with a red flag. This is expressed as, “When this beach is not safe for swimming, it is correctly labeled with a red flag x% of the time.” 100% yields a perfect Sensitivity score. Positive Predictive Efficiency measures what fraction of the time a posted red flag is correct. Specificity tells us when the beach is safe for swimming, what fraction of the time the beach is correctly labeled with a blue flag. This is expressed as, “When this beach is safe for swimming, it is correctly labeled with a blue flag x% of the time.” 100% yields a perfect Specificity score. Negative Predictive Efficiency measures what fraction of the time a posted blue flag is correct. Overall Predictive Efficiency measures what fraction of the time the flags are in general correct. This metric can be expressed as, “The flags correctly indicate that the beach is safe or unsafe for swimming x% of the time.” Beach Flagging and Management metrics are only available for beaches that are tested on a daily basis. Overall Beach Safety Beach 2013 Overall Beach Safety Test Frequency # of sampling locations Nantasket City Point Savin Hill Carson Beach M Street Constitution Beach Pleasure Bay Short Beach Winthrop Beach Revere Nahant Wollaston* King's Beach** Malibu Beach Tenean Beach 100% 100% 100% 98.73% 98.73% 97.05% 95.78% 94.12% 94.12% 93.75% 91.18% 88.27% 83.12% 76.47% 62.96% weekly daily weekly daily daily daily daily weekly weekly weekly weekly daily daily weekly daily 4 1 1 2 1 3 3 1 1 4 4 4 3 1 1 *Wollaston Beach includes the Milton St, Channing St, Sachem St, and Rice Road sampling locations. **King’s Beach has 3 primary sampling locations, but is also tested at Stacey Brook outfall for bacterial exceedances. Overall Beach Safety (2011-2013) Beach 2013 2012 2011 3-year Avg Nantasket City Point Savin Hill Carson Beach M Street Constitution Beach Pleasure Bay Short Beach Winthrop Beach Revere Nahant Wollaston* King's Beach Malibu Beach Tenean Beach All Beaches 100% 100% 100% 98.73% 98.73% 97.05% 95.78% 94.12% 94.12% 93.75% 91.18% 88.27% 83.12% 76.47% 62.96% 91.62% 98.33% 100.00% 88.24% 98.68% 98.68% 88.60% 93.86% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 89.29% 93.20% 86.40% 88.89% 81.82% 93.73% 100.00% 98.60% 91.70% 97.30% 98.60% 93.20% 94.50% 83.30% 84.60% 87.50% 88.50% 88.73% 73.20% 91.70% 79.50% 90.06% 99.44% 99.53% 93.31% 98.24% 98.67% 92.95% 94.71% 92.47% 92.91% 93.75% 89.66% 90.07% 80.91% 85.69% 74.76% 91.80% *Wollaston Beach includes the Milton St, Channing St, Sachem St, and Rice Road sampling locations. Individual Beach Summaries Nahant Nahant Beach is located in Nahant, MA and has four sampling locations that were tested weekly for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Nahant received an Overall Beach Safety score of 91.18%, which was higher than the previous year’s score of 89.29%. There were 6 bacterial exceedances in the 68 samples taken in 2013. Nahant Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 68 6 weekly 91.18% Nahant posts a red flag when there is a bacterial exceedance at 2 or more of its sampling locations. In 2013, Nahant had one red flag posting. As previously stated, the metrics on flagging accuracy cannot be computed for beaches with weekly bacterial testing. King’s King’s Beach is located on the Lynn and Swampscott line. It has three sampling locations that were tested daily for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, King’s received an Overall Beach Safety score of 83.12%, which is lower than the previous year’s score of 86.40%. There were 22 bacterial exceedances in the 237 total samples taken in 2013. King's Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples 237 # Bacterial Exceedances 22 Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety daily 83.12% King’s Beach posts a red flag when there is a bacterial exceedance at 2 or more of its sampling locations. In 2013, King’s had 13 red flag postings. King's Flagging Metrics Sensitivity Positive Predictive Efficiency Specificity Negative Predictive Efficiency Overall Predictive Efficiency 63.64% 50.00% 89.71% 93.85% 87.34% Revere Beach Revere Beach is located in Revere, MA and has four sampling locations that were tested weekly for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Revere received an Overall Beach Safety score of 93.75%, which was lower than the previous year’s score of 100%. There was one bacterial exceedance in the 64 samples taken in 2013. Revere Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Bacterial Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 64 1 weekly 93.75% Revere posts a red flag when there is a bacterial exceedance at two or more of its sampling locations. In 2013, Revere had one red flag posting. Since Revere Beach is tested on a weekly basis, beach management metrics are not computed. Short Beach Short Beach is located in Revere, MA and has one sampling location that was tested weekly for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Short Beach received an Overall Beach Safety score of 94.12%, which was lower than the previous year’s score of 100%. There was one bacterial exceedance in the 17 samples taken in 2013. Short Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Bacterial Exceedances Test Frequency 17 1 weekly Overall Beach Safety 94.12% Short Beach posts a red flag when there is a bacterial count greater than 104 cfu. In 2013, Short Beach had one red flag posting. Since Short Beach is tested on a weekly basis, beach management metrics are not computed. Winthrop Winthrop Beach is located in Winthrop, MA and has one sampling location that was tested weekly for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Winthrop received an Overall Beach Safety score of 94.12%, which was lower than the previous year’s score of 100%. There was one bacterial exceedance in the 17 samples taken in 2013. Winthrop Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Bacterial Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 17 1 weekly 94.12% Winthrop Beach posts a red flag when there is a bacterial count greater than 104 cfu. In 2013, Winthrop had one red flag posting. Since Winthrop is tested on a weekly basis, beach management metrics are not computed. Constitution Constitution Beach is located in East Boston and has three sampling locations that were tested daily for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Constitution received an Overall Beach Safety score of 97.05%, which was higher than the previous year’s score of 88.60%. There were 4 bacterial exceedances in the 237 samples taken in 2013. Constitution Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Bacterial Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 237 4 daily 97.05% Constitution posts a red flag when there is a bacterial exceedance at two or more of its sampling locations. In 2013, there were 5 red flags posted on Constitution Beach. Constitution Flagging Metrics Sensitivity 50.00% Positive Predictive Efficiency 20.00% Specificity 94.81% Negative Predictive Efficiency 98.65% Overall Predictive Efficiency 93.67% Pleasure Bay Pleasure Bay is located in South Boston and has three sampling locations that were tested daily for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Pleasure Bay received an Overall Beach Safety score of 95.78%, which was higher than the previous year’s score of 93.86%. There were 10 bacterial exceedances in the 228 samples taken in 2013. Pleasure Bay Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Bacterial Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 237 10 daily 95.78% Pleasure Bay posts a red flag when there is a bacterial exceedance at two or more of its sampling locations. In 2013, there were no red flags posted on Pleasure Bay Beach. Pleasure Bay Flagging Metrics Sensitivity 0.00% Positive Predictive Efficiency 0.00% Specificity 98.73% Negative Predictive Efficiency 100.00% Overall Predictive Efficiency 98.73% M Street M Street beach is located in South Boston and has one sampling location that was tested daily for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, M Street received an Overall Beach Safety score of 98.73%, which was higher than the previous year’s score of 98.68%. There was one bacterial exceedance in the 79 samples taken in 2013. M Street Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Bacterial Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 79 1 daily 98.73% M Street posts a red flag when there is a bacterial count greater than 104 cfu. In 2013, M Street had one red flag posting. M Street Flagging Metrics Sensitivity 0.00% Positive Predictive Efficiency 0.00% Specificity Negative Predictive Efficiency Overall Predictive Efficiency 98.72% 100.00% 96.20% Carson Beach Carson Beach is located in South Boston and has two sampling locations that were tested daily for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Carson received an Overall Beach Safety score of 98.73%, which was higher than the previous year’s score of 98.68%. There were 2 bacterial exceedances in the 158 samples taken in 2013. Carson Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Bacterial Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 158 2 daily 98.73% Carson posts a red flag when there is a bacterial exceedance at one or more of its sampling locations. In 2013, there were 2 red flags posted on Carson Beach. Carson Flagging Metrics Sensitivity Positive Predictive Efficiency Specificity Negative Predictive Efficiency Overall Predictive Efficiency 0.00% 0.00% 96.10% 97.37% 93.67% City Point City Point is located in South Boston and has one sampling location that was tested daily for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, City Point received an Overall Beach Safety score of 100% as there were no bacterial exceedances on the days sampled. This score is the same as the previous year’s score of 100%. City Point Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Bacterial Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 79 0 daily 100.00% City Point posts a red flag when there is a bacterial count greater than 104 cfu. In 2013, there were no red flag postings on City Point Beach. City Point Flagging Metrics Sensitivity Positive Predictive Efficiency Specificity Negative Predictive Efficiency Overall Predictive Efficiency 0.00% 0.00% 98.73% 100.00% 98.73% Tenean Tenean Beach is located in Dorchester and has one sampling location that was tested daily for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Tenean received an Overall Beach Safety score of 62.20%, which was lower than the previous year’s score of 81.82%. There were a total of 17 bacterial exceedances and 14 GM exceedances in the 82 samples taken in 2013. Tenean Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Bacterial Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 81 31 daily 62.96% Tenean posts a red flag when there is a bacterial count greater than 104 cfu. In 2013, Tenean Beach had 38 red flag postings. Tenean Flagging Metrics Sensitivity Positive Predictive Efficiency Specificity Negative Predictive Efficiency Overall Predictive Efficiency 61.29% 55.88% 70.00% 74.47% 66.67% Malibu Beach Malibu Beach is located in Dorchester and has one sampling location that was tested weekly for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Malibu received an Overall Beach Safety score of 76.47%, which was lower than the previous year’s score of 88.89%. There were a total of 4 bacterial exceedances in the 17 samples taken in 2013. Malibu Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Bacterial Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 17 4 weekly 76.47% Malibu posts a red flag when there is a bacterial count greater than 104 cfu. In 2013, Malibu had 3 red flag postings. Since Malibu Beach is tested on a weekly basis, beach management metrics are not computed. Savin Hill Beach Savin Hill Beach is located in Dorchester and has one sampling location that was tested weekly for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Savin Hill received an Overall Beach Safety score of 100% as there were no bacterial exceedances on the days sampled. This was higher than the previous year’s score of 88.24%. Savin Hill Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Bacterial Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 17 0 weekly 100.00% Savin Hill posts a red flag when there is a bacterial count greater than 104 cfu. In 2013, there were no red flag postings on Savin Hill Beach. Since Savin Hill Beach is tested on a weekly basis, beach management metrics are not computed. Wollaston Beach at Milton Road Milton Rd is one of four sampling locations on Wollaston Beach in Quincy, MA that was tested daily for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Milton received an Overall Beach Safety score of 88.89%, which was lower than the previous year’s score of 96.05%. There were a total of 9 bacterial exceedances in the 81 samples taken in 2013. Milton Rd Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 81 9 daily 88.89% Milton posts a red flag when there is a bacterial count greater than 104 cfu. Wollaston Beach posts a red flag across the beach when there is a bacterial exceedance at two or more sampling locations. In 2013, Milton Rd had 6 red flag postings. Wollaston @ Milton Rd Flagging Metrics Sensitivity 22.22% Positive Predictive Efficiency 33.33% Specificity 94.44% Negative Predictive Efficiency 90.67% Overall Predictive Efficiency 86.42% Wollaston Beach at Channing Street Channing St is one of four sampling locations at Wollaston Beach that was tested daily for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Channing received an Overall Beach Safety score of 80.25%, which was lower than the previous year’s score of 87.18%. There were a total of 16 bacterial exceedances in the 81 samples taken in 2013. Channing St Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 81 16 daily 80.25% Channing St posts a red flag when there is a bacterial count greater than 104 cfu. Wollaston Beach posts a red flag across the beach when there is a bacterial exceedance at two or more sampling locations. In 2013, Channing St had 10 red flag postings. Wollaston @ Channing St Flagging Metrics Sensitivity 25.00% Positive Predictive Efficiency 40.00% Specificity 90.77% Negative Predictive Efficiency 83.10% Overall Predictive Efficiency 77.78% Wollaston Beach at Sachem Street Sachem St is one of four sampling locations on Wollaston Beach that was tested daily for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Sachem received an Overall Beach Safety score of 90.12%, which was lower than the previous year’s score of 94.81%. There were a total of 8 bacterial exceedances in the 81 samples taken in 2013. Sachem St Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 81 8 daily 90.12% Sachem St posts a red flag when there is a bacterial count greater than 104 cfu. Wollaston Beach posts a red flag across the beach when there is a bacterial exceedance at two or more sampling locations. In 2013, Sachem St had 6 red flag postings. Wollaston @ Sachem St Flagging Metrics Sensitivity 12.50% Positive Predictive Efficiency 16.67% Specificity 93.15% Negative Predictive Efficiency 90.67% Overall Predictive Efficiency 85.19% Wollaston Beach at Rice Road Rice Road is one of four sampling locations on Wollaston Beach that was tested daily for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Rice Road received an Overall Beach Safety score of 93.83%, which was lower than the previous year’s score of 94.74%. There were a total of 5 bacterial exceedances in the 81 samples taken in 2013. Rice Road Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 81 5 daily 93.83% Rice Road posts a red flag when there is a bacterial count greater than 104 cfu. Wollaston Beach posts a red flag across the beach when there is a bacterial exceedance at two or more sampling locations. In 2013, Rice Road had 2 red flag postings. Wollaston @ Rice Road Flagging Metrics Sensitivity 0.00% Positive Predictive Efficiency 0.00% Specificity 97.37% Negative Predictive Efficiency 93.67% Overall Predictive Efficiency 91.36% Nantasket Nantasket Beach is located in Hull, MA and has four sampling locations that were tested weekly for bacterial counts in 2013. In 2013, Nantasket received an Overall Beach Safety score of 100% as there were no bacterial exceedances on the days sampled. This was higher than the previous year’s score of 98.33%. Nantasket Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Bacterial Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 56 0 weekly 100.00% Nantasket posts a red flag when there is a bacterial exceedance at two or more of its sampling locations. In 2013, there were no red flags posted on Nantasket Beach. Since Nantasket is tested on a weekly basis, beach management metrics are not computed. Aggregated Data for South Boston The South Boston beaches at M Street Beach, Carson Beach, and City Point received an aggregated Overall Beach Safety score of 99.15% in 2013, which was slightly higher than the previous year’s score of 99.12%. South Boston Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 316 3 daily 99.15% The South Boston beaches post a red flag on the beach when there is a bacterial count greater than 104 cfu at that sampling location. In 2013, South Boston had a total of 3 red flag postings. South Boston Flagging Metrics Sensitivity 0.00% Positive Predictive Efficiency 0.00% Specificity 97.44% Negative Predictive Efficiency 98.70% Overall Predictive Efficiency 96.20% Aggregated Data for Wollaston Beach: All Sampling Locations In 2013, Wollaston received an Overall Beach Safety score of 88.89%, which was lower than the previous year’s score of 93.20%. There were a total of 21 bacterial exceedances in the 81 samples days in 2013. Wollaston Beach Safety 2013 Total # Samples # Bacterial Exceedances Test Frequency Overall Beach Safety 324 21 daily 88.27% Wollaston posts a red flag when there is a bacterial exceedance at two or more of its sampling locations. In 2013, Wollaston Beach had 12 red flag postings. Wollaston Flagging Metrics Sensitivity 33.33% Positive Predictive Efficiency Specificity Negative Predictive Efficiency Overall Predictive Efficiency 25.00% 87.32% 91.18% 81.25% Save the Harbor/Save the Bay would like to thank Dr. Jim Shine and Dr. Judy Pederson, Co-Chairs of our Beaches Science Advisory Committee, Kelly Coughlin of the MWRA, Dr. Andrea Rex, DCR’s Gary Briere, SH/SB’s Water Quality Analyst Jacqueline Sussman and Policy Intern Yudan Jiang for their help with this report. For more information on Save the Harbor/Save the Bay’s Beaches Report Card, contact Bruce Berman on his cell at 617-293-6243 or email [email protected] You can find data and learn more about the methodology on which the report card is based at www.savetheharbor.org/beachesreportcard
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz