Implementing an effective risk management strategy in a law firm Peter Scott Peter Scott Consulting www.peterscottconsult.co.uk Who has a risk manager? Law Firm Risks Operational Law Firm Is your management in control of your risks Operational Management Operational Risks – negligent advice Operational Law Firm Law Firm Examples of Operational Risks Negligent advice Lack of management commitment to best practice and risk management Lack of knowledge by management Lack of supervision High risk work Client vetting / fraud Client care / matter care Resource capability Lack of knowledge/expertise/experience Precedents / multiple use of advice International work / overseas offices Why manage operational risks? “The pursuit of excellence, with the aim of doing things better for the clients” Director of Risk of a ‘top ten’ UK law firm Which common factors are necessary if risks are to be adequately managed? Top level ‘buy in’ to management of risk Knowledge by management of its Business A ‘no guilt’ culture to encourage disclosure Risk Management / KM Risks are inter-related Failure to manage knowledge involves widespread risk KM is an essential part of an integrated risk management strategy Your Risk Areas? Where does the knowledge in your risk areas reside? Can you access it? Do you have systems to maintain and upgrade your knowledge? Risk/KM Risk Knowledge Management Management A Risk Management / KM integrated approach Approach risk from a KM viewpoint and vice versa Need to manage the risks relating to knowledge in any event Managing the risks Quality assurance Greater competitiveness Implementing a Risk Management Strategy DIAGNOSIS Identification and assessment MITIGATION Control, transfer and avoidance MONITORING Auditing, tracking and reporting When a risk crystallises LIMITATION Minimising the effect of crystallised risks Risk Identification Involves: Being management driven Top down / bottom up Brainstorming sessions Facilitated discussions Risk Assessment Incidence - probability Impact - severity Risk Diagnosis Set criteria for assessing risks Identify detailed risks Identify high level risks Assess severity of detailed risks Assess severity of high-level risks Risk map Risk summary Risk Mapping IMPACT High High impact/ low incidence High impact/ high incidence Low impact/ low incidence Low impact/ high incidence Low Low High INCIDENCE Some key factors in identifying and assessing risks Areas of law Claims record Number and location of offices Fee income / size of firm Commitment to best practice Knowledge management Are risk management procedures in place? Supervision levels Risk Mitigation Designed to: Avoid Reduce Transfer Accept Risk mitigation Risk map Risk summary Residual risk summary Consider impact/probability correlation Consider available mitigation techniques Contingency plan requirements Insurance requirements summary Required controls summary Monitoring involves Auditing, tracking and reporting Comparing actual outturns to preset indicators Confirming effectiveness of risk responses Reporting compliance and exceptions Risk monitoring Required controls summary Contingency plan requirements Set risk indicators and methods to monitor them Insurance requirements summary Annual Risk Management Report Limitation involves Risk crystalisation scenarios Contingency plans Limitation procedures Post event assessment Use of risk management tools? Use an integrated risk management system to quantify, assess and control risk by : streamlining diagnosis, mitigation and monitoring embedding common risk management procedures providing information access to all who need it creating and maintaining one central, up to date risk database Advantages of a formal risk management process? Structured approach focuses on key risks Elimination of redundant procedures Comfort / assurance to PI insurers Universal application to all risk areas Continuous monitoring ensures management of risk is “lived” day to day Is your management in control of your risks Operational Management Any questions?
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz