FERTILIZER TRENDS Prepared for the Nomura Global Chemistry Leaders Conference by Barrie Bain Director, FERTECON Limited Rome, 22 March 2012 FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 1 FERTECON Limited Formed in1978 Leading provider of fertilizer market information, prices and analysis Now part of Informa – publishers of Lloyd’s List, Agra Europe, Agrow and owners of Datamonitor The link with Informa gives FERTECON new access to data and analysis resources on agriculture, shipping and freight and energy FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 2 A WORLD TURNED UPSIDE DOWN China – the new Europe - high energy prices, overcapacity, rationalisation, reduced exports United States – the new Middle East - low energy prices – new investment Sub Saharan Africa – The other new Middle East – interest in projects to use surplus gas The Middle East – the new United States increases in energy prices Russia – higher gas prices on the horizon – now higher than US India – the new swing market FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 3 A CHANGING MARKET MARKET BEHAVIOUR Dealers/distributors becoming risk averse – there is a switch to “just in time” purchasing This is pushing price risk both up and down the supply chain, to suppliers and farmers NITROGEN Changing energy costs with US now low cost, China high cost and costs in Middle East increasing. This will affect future investment decisions PHOSPHATE Phosphate becoming the new potash with lots of exploration interest by junior miners in phosphate rock POTASH New entrants could challenge current market structure FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 4 FERTILIZER MARKET DRIVERS There has a been a strong correlation between crop prices and prices for key crops Corn, wheat, rice soybeans are key drivers, although there a differences between regions and nutrients On the supply side, for nitrogen, oil, gas and coal prices are key drivers, determining base costs and where new capacity is located. For phosphate and potash, the existence of reserves, investment costs and finance and logistics are key drivers of new supply Fertilizer costs are critical for farmers – making up 3040% of input costs for many key crops – and usually the largest single component FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 5 FERTILIZER USE BY CROP 15% 16% 15% 15% 4% 4% 5% 2% 4% 5% 15% Wheat Rice Corn Other coarse grain Soybean Oil palm Other oilseed Cotton Sugar Fruit + Veg Other Source: IFA FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 6 UREA PRICES 550 $/t © FERTECON 2012 500 450 400 NOLA granular (ston) 350 Yuzhnyy prilled (tonne) 300 2011 2012 FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 7 PHOSPHATE PRICES FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 8 POTASH PRICES US$/t spot 600 cfr Latin America granular fob Vancouver std 500 fob Baltic std fob W Europe gran 400 © FERTECON 2012 300 11 12 FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 9 CROP PRICES $/bushel 15 Monthly average price received by US farmers 12 9 soybean 6 wheat 3 corn Source: USDA 0 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 10 11 12 10 CROP vs FERTILIZER PRICES FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 11 CROP vs FERTILIZER PRICES $/bushel Monthly average corn price received by US farmers $/tonne fob 700 urea fob Middle East DAP fob US Gulf potash fob 600 6 DAP 500 7 5 potash urea 400 4 Source: FERTECON/ USDA 300 3 11 12 FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 12 CROP PRICES - EUROPE €/tonne 600 End month price LIFFE- Paris 500 400 rapeseed 300 200 100 wheat Source: The Public Ledger - Informa Agra 0 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 10 11 12 13 CROP vs FERTILIZER PRICES 500 €/tonne €/tonne 500 AN UK 400 400 CAN Germany 300 300 200 200 UAN France 100 100 wheat: end-month price LIFFE Paris Source: FERTECON/ The Public Ledger - Informa Agra 0 0 05 06 07 08 09 FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 10 11 12 14 CROP vs FERTILIZER PRICES 400 €/tonne 400 €/tonne AN UK 350 300 350 300 CAN Germany 250 UAN France 200 250 200 wheat: end-month price LIFFE Paris Source: FERTECON/ The Public Ledger - Informa Agra 150 150 J 11 F M A M J J A S FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 O N D J 12 F 15 DEMAND DESTRUCTION Demand destruction was seen in 2008 as fertilizer prices rose above long term correlations with prices of key crops Many crops did not see the strong prices and fertilizer application fell sharply on these – especially in subsistence agriculture India was immune to demand destruction in 2008 due to the subsidy system Indian subsidy cuts on P+K in the current fertilizer year, together with higher international prices led to higher retail prices and a sharp fall in demand Last week’s budget indicated cuts in P+K subsidies for 2012/13 – around 16% Urea subsidy cut by 1% for local urea and 5% for imported Government looking to switch subsidy payment system from producers and importers to local dealers and eventually to farmers FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 16 INDIAN SUBSIDY CHANGES Billion rupees Subsidies Imported urea Budget 2011-12 Revised 2011-12 Budget 2012-13 Change budget 2010-11 to budget 2011-12 Change revised 2010-11 to budget 2011-12 69.830 138.830 133.980 64.150 -4.850 Indigenous urea 133.080 191.080 190.000 56.920 -1.080 Decontrolled fertilizer 297.069 342.079 285.761 -11.308 -56.318 Total subsidy 499.979 671.989 609.741 109.762 -62.248 FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 17 IMPORTANCE OF INDIA INDIAN IMPORTS AS SHARE OF WORLD TRADE Phos acid DAP MOP India RoW Urea Ammonia 0 10 20 30 40 50 million tonnes FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 18 NITROGEN New capacity changing market balance FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 19 UREA SUPPLY INCREASES UREA EXPORTS 2005, 2010, 2015 AND 2020 million tonnes 50 Less from Europe & China 40 More from Europe & China More from Africa, Indonesia, Malaysia & Argentina More from China 30 Other Marginal No change Other Dedicated More from Egypt More from CIS CIS Less from CIS 20 Less from CIS Same from M. East More from M. East 10 Middle East More from M. East 0 2005 2010 2015 FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 2020 20 NEW NORTH AMERICAN CAPACITY? Low gas prices in the US have stimulated new petrochemical projects – especially ethylene However, in the fertilizer sector, firm announcements have been restricted to debottlenecking and small expansions Now, Yara is talking about a major expansion at Belle Plaine, Saskatchewan OCI has been awarded state grants to help develop an ammonia/urea/DEF/UAN project in Iowa We could see other projects announced, but capital costs and permitting remain a constraint FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 21 US UREA COST OF SUPPLY $/tonne cash cost delivered to Midwest terminal/ex-plant Midwest March 2012 400 375 350 325 300 275 250 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 barge freight freight to US other costs cost of gas /coal Midwest plant Middle East plant Ukrainian plant FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 Chinese coal-based plant 22 UREA COST CURVE 2011 Cash Cost in $/tonne fob plant in 2011 400 China 350 Anthracite Gas 300 250 Steam Coal Europe N.America India Russia 200 M. East Ukraine 150 100 Other Asia 50 Africa 0 0 25 50 75 2011 Production in million tonnes 100 FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 125 150 23 UREA COST CURVE 2015 Cash Cost in $/tonne fob plant 350 China Gas 300 Steam Coal China Anthracite Russia 250 N.America 200 India L.America West East Europe Ukraine Other Asia 150 Africa M.East 100 50 0 0 25 50 75 100 2015 Production in million tonnes FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 125 150 175 24 NEW AFRICAN CAPACITY? Availability of low cost associated gas, currently being flared, is attracting interest in investment in ammonia/urea in Africa Project going ahead in Gabon, led by Olam, agricultural commodities company Interest in projects in Nigeria, Angola, Mozambique and elsewhere With gas costs increasing in MENA region, Africa looks attractive at $1/mmBtu gas FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 25 POTASH New entrants could change market structure FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 26 POTASH PRODUCTION Total 60.5 million tonnes KCl - 2011 estimate Germany Israel Jordan China FSU US Chile Spain UK Brazil Canada Capacity 75.8 million t - 80% utilisation FERTECON / BARINGS POTASH FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 27 27 POTASH EXPORTS POTASH EXPORT SOURCES - 2012 estimate Total - approx 25.6 million tonnes nutrient Others Jordan Canada Israel Germany Belarus Russia FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 28 POTASH SUPPLY Two major supply points – Canada and FSU – account for almost two thirds of world production This is represented by five producers and two marketing organisations Four marketing organisations – Canpotex, BPC, K+S and ICL– account for almost 90% of export sales (excluding Canada to US) FERTECON / BARINGS POTASH FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 29 29 NEW POTASH SUPPLY Two new Canadian producers – K+S and BHP Billiton Two new mines in Russia by new producer EuroChem Two new mines in Latin America by Vale – one in Brazil and one in Argentina Twenty or more potential projects by junior miners FERTECON / BARINGS POTASH FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 30 30 POTASH PRODUCTION FORECAST WORLD POTASH PRODUCTION 2009-2020 80 million tonnes KCl Middle East 75 70 65 Europe 60 55 50 Latin America 45 40 Asia 35 30 25 FSU 20 15 10 North America 5 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 FERTECON / BARINGS POTASH FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 2018 2019 2020 31 31 POTASH SUPPLY/DEMAND million tonnes KCl equivalent 120 110 Capacity 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Consumption 30 20 10 0 81 85 90 95 00 05 FERTECON / BARINGS POTASH FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 10 15 20 32 32 POTASH COSTS Israel ex-mine fob port Germany FSU Canada 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 $/tonne FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 33 POTASH CASH COST CURVE EX-MINE Cash Cost in $/tonne fob mine 250 Germany Spain/UK FERTECON ESTIMATES 200 150 Belarus Canada 100 Jordan Russia Israel 50 0 0 10 20 Production in million tonnes KCl 30 FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 40 50 34 PHOSPHATE New Saudi capacity moving market into surplus FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 35 SAUDI ARABIA ADDING TO SUPPLY Ma’aden project now cranking up towards its 3 million t/y capacity – around 15% of global trade Second project developing new mining area given go-ahead Capacity may have been easily absorbed by market except for downturn in Indian demand Extra Saudi supply could be compensated by lower Chinese exports in 2012 FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 36 ROCK DEVELOPMENTS Higher prices for phosphates since 2007 has attracted interest in new projects Vale Bayovar project in Peru already operational Potential projects in Australia, Africa and Latin America Projects focussing on just rock – lower capex and quicker to develop than integrated phosphate fertilizer facilities New rock supplies could eventually reduce Moroccan dominance of rock market FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 37 MIDDLE EAST / NORTH AFRICA Still a supply risk FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 38 MIDDLE EAST CRITICAL TO AMMONIA, UREA AND SULPHUR SUPPLY Middle East accounts for 32% of urea exports and 15% of ammonia Middle East accounts for one third of US urea imports and 20% of US total supply Middle East supply accounts for 85% of Indian ammonia imports 35% of new urea capacity located in Middle East Middle East accounts for 30% of world sulphur exports Middle East accounts for 90% of Indian sulphur imports and 20% of North African supplies Yara Libya j-v plant still down Tunisian phosphate production disrupted through most of 2011 Concern about Iran –exports disrupted by financial sanctions FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 39 MENA SHARE OF PRODUCTION Algeria PRODUCTION 2010 Phos acid TSP MAP/DAP MOP Urea Ammonia 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 million tonnes FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 140 160 Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Bahrain Iran Iraq Israel Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Syria UAE RoW 40 MENA SHARE OF EXPORTS EXPORTS 2010 Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Phos acid TSP MAP/DAP MOP Urea Ammonia 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 million tonnes FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 35 40 45 Tunisia Bahrain Iran Israel Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia UAE RoW 41 OUTLOOK A curate’s egg – good and bad in parts FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 42 SHORT TERM MARKET OUTLOOK POSITIVE Crop prices remain strong Farmer and dealer purchasing behind normal No big consumer inventory build Farmers still need to buy fertilizers for the spring Delays to major nitrogen projects NEGATIVE Last minute rush for product could create bottlenecks Indian demand destruction has had a negative impact on P+K Supply increases in all three nutrients this year FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 43 CROP vs FERTILIZER PRICES 1400 $/bushel $/tonne fob 7 1300 1200 1100 urea fob Middle East DAP fob US Gulf potash fob 6 1000 Monthly average corn price received by US farmers 900 800 5 4 700 600 3 DAP 500 400 2 urea 300 200 1 potash 100 Source: FERTECON/ USDA 0 0 10 11 12 FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 44 LONG TERM SENSITIVITIES Population growth There are signs that population growth is slowing This could mean that instead of having to feed 9 million people by 2050 the UN medium forecast), it could be 8 billion – just 15% more than today This could mean slower fertilizer demand growth, although increased affluence will mean increased meat consumption, and thus increased demand for feed grains FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 45 LONG TERM SENSITIVITIES Genetic modification could limit fertilizer demand growth longer term Research underway on transferring the ability of legumes to fix nitrogen from the atmosphere to corn, wheat etc, thus reducing nitrogen requirements. GM techniques could improve nutrient uptake by crops, lowering potential fertilizer demand growth. GM could lead to development of crops that require less nutrient input However, there will still be fertilizer demand growth and there is an increased potential for higher value “smart fertilizers” FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 46 LONG TERM SENSITIVITIES Increased recycling Nutrient recovery at sewerage plants could provide source of fertilizers Better use of manures and application of some of the techniques of organic farming could provide larger portion of nutrient requirements although this will remain limited Organic lobby is increasing in influence – could affect some government policy – particularly over “sustainability” FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 47 LONG TERM SENSITIVITIES Africa could see substantial fertilizer demand growth African fertilizer application the lowest in the world Increased focus from fertilizer industry, government international agencies and NGOs on increasing food production Investment in distribution schemes and farmer education to help smallholder farmers Gates Foundation looking at major development programmes Contract farming schemes to produce food for export could see major increase in fertilizer usage FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 48 ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITIES Nitrate directive already constrains nitrogen application in most of EU Phosphate application limited by regulations in Scandinavia, Netherlands Growing concern on impact of fertilizer run off leading to lawn fertilizer restrictions in many US states and now proposals in several states to restrict agricultural fertilizer application Concern of imbalanced nitrogen application in parts of China and India Major opportunity for “smart” fertilizers and enhanced application techniques Greenhouse gas emissions become a major factor – already top of the agenda in EU industry Increasing market for ammonia and urea for NOx abatement FERTECON/NomuraMar 2012 49
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz