1 Council Request for Staff to Consider Different Rating Options for Mercury Bay Parks and Reserves TO Mercury Bay Community Board FROM Steve Baker - Chief Financial Officer DATE 6 June 2013 SUBJECT Council Request for Staff to Consider Different Rating Options for Mercury Bay Parks and Reserves 1 Purpose of Report On Tuesday 12 June the Community Board and Council will workshop some potential options and associated risks arising from the Council request to review the manner in which the Mercury Bay Parks and Reserves activity is funded and in particular the funding of the new Mercury Bay Sports Complex (MBSC) in the 2013-14 Annual Plan The purpose of this report is to seek the Board's official endorsement if a preferred option is identified in that workshop. This will then enable staff to calculate the rates for 2013/2014 and submit them to Council for within the legislated timeframes. Failure to set the rate for 2013/2014 prior to 30 June 2013 will have a significant adverse impact on Council finances. 2 Background The purpose of the Ten Year Plan is to" Describe the activities of Council Describe the community outcomes Provide a basis of accountability Provide an opportunity for participation by the public in decision making process on activities to be undertaken by the Council. It is assumed this would also include how those individual activities would be funded. On the 27 of June 2012, Council adopted a Ten Year Plan for the period 1 July 2012 through to 30 June 2013. The purpose of Council's Annual Plan, amongst others, is to: Identify any variation [emphasis added] from the financial statements and funding impact statement included in its Ten Year Plan. Contribute to the accountability to the Community Extend opportunities for participation by the public in decision-making processes relating to the costs and funding of activities to be undertaken. Council has recently completed its deliberations phase of the process to adopt the Annual Plan for 2013/14, where it considered submissions received during the special consultative phase. During these deliberations, Council considered submission number 119 regarding the rates requirement for the Mercury Bay Multi Sports Complex. 2 During discussion on this submission members of the Council felt that, with the introduction of the MBSC into the Mercury Bay Parks and Reserves activity, that the current funding model was inequitable for those properties with high land value located outside of the Whitianga Township. Council considered that with the introduction of the MBSC within the Mercury Bay Parks and Reserves activity that the activities composition is now so significantly different from the other Community Board areas that a consistent rating structure across each of the community board areas would no longer be appropriate. As such Council considered that the MBSC introduction necessitates a change to the funding structure of the Mercury Bay Parks and Reserves activity contained within the 2013/14 Annual Plan. Accordingly it made the following request: "Notes that between now and the adoption of the Annual Plan staff will bring back options and implications for more even funding of the capital expenditure (e.g. targeted rate for Mercury Bay)". 3 Issue Staff have been requested to identify any potential inhibitors that may restrict Council's ability to address the perceived inequity that has arisen with the advent of the MBSC in relation to the funding of the Mercury Bay Parks and Reserves activity. 4 Discussion Council Activities The 2012-2022 Ten Year Plan set out 28 activities of Council together with: What we do in each activity How the activity contributes to the District What the activity includes And what services you expect us to deliver from the activity. Any major projects How it will be funded Any significant negative effects that might arise out of the activity; and What has changed since the 2009-2019 Ten-Year Plan? One of those 28 activities is the Parks and Reserves Activity. A key project listed under that activity was the third instalment in relation to the purchase of the land on which the MBSC is situated and the construction of the complex itself. In relation to how the activity was to be funded, the Ten year Plan asserted that local communities are considered to primarily benefit from this activity as they have the best access to local parks and reserves, and because the parks and reserves in each board area contribute to that community's "sense of place". Funding of Operating Expenditure Catchment(s)* In a bit more detail... 3 Activity Fees and Charges UAGC General Rate Targeted Rate** Parks & Reserves LOW HIGH Board Area Fees and charges - (low) Targeted rate land value (board) (medium) Targeted rate fixed charge (board) (low) Funding of this activity varies by Community Board Area As such, currently each Community funds its own parks and reserves. They do this largely by targeted rate to local communities. The portion calculated by land value purportedly reflects the need to recognise affordability within communities. A small amount of funding is generated by user charges for those who may have exclusive access to areas of parks at times. Note the Locally Targeted Rate and Charge used to fund the Mercury Bay Parks and Reserves is sourced only from the Mercury Bay Community Board Area. Staff will lead a discussion on this matter with Council seeking its guidance on a potential solution on the funding structure for the Mercury Bay Parks and Reserves Activity so that it may be incorporated into the Draft Annual Plan for 2013/2014. The Draft Annual Plan will then be submitted for Council's formal approval on the 26 June 2013. Prior to the Mercury Bay Community Board meeting this month, Council staff will workshop the issue with the Audit Committee and at the Council workshop. Outcomes from both workshops will contribute to the resolutions formed at the following Mercury Bay Community Board meeting to be held on 18 June 2013. 5 Suggested Resolution(s) That the Mercury Bay Community Board: 1. 2. Receives the report. To be completed at the Community Board meeting.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz