The Value
Proposition
Kingspan Cost
Optimal Energy
Saving Building
Solutions
The Value
Proposition
What are Cost Optimal Energy
Saving Building Solutions?
Less
Capital Cost
Building designs
that reduce both
whole building capital
cost and lifecycle
operational cost.
Higher
Return on
Investment
Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions
provide many compelling advantages to the different property stakeholders:
they consume less energy, they emit less carbon dioxide and they are
environmentally responsible over their lifetime, but the perception is that these
types of buildings carry substantial capital cost premiums.
Kingspan Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions can deliver minimum
capital and lifetime operation costs for a building.
2
Contents
The Value Proposition
The Green Agenda
4
10
Why do we need Cost Optimal Energy
Saving Building Solutions?
Property Stakeholder Advantages
10
Who Benefits?
Reduced
Heating and
Cooling Loads
Lower
Lifetime
Operating Costs
Higher
Rental Income
Enhanced
Green Building
Ratings
3
Route to Net-Zero Energy Buildings
12
Three-step Process
14
A ‘Holistic’ Design Approach
16
Exemplar Case Studies
17
Retail Warehouse
Large Supermarket
Speculative Office
Distribution Warehouse
18
20
22
24
Green Building Ratings
26
BREEAM
LEED
26
27
The Value
Proposition
For over 40 years, we at Kingspan Insulated Panels have pushed
the boundaries of the building envelope, creating the world’s
most advanced, high performance systems.
Through our knowledge and innovation and world-class technical expertise, we can provide
future-proofed Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions to help architects and design
teams realise affordable, energy efficient and sustainable buildings.
Sample reports carried out by AECOM, along with advice on
how Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions can be
achieved, are available from Kingspan Technical Services on:
t: 0800 587 0090
e: [email protected]
Kingspan Cost
Optimal Energy Saving
Building Solutions
can offer...
4
The Value
Proposition
less capital cost...
Kingspan has proven that the integration of an enhanced building envelope
with a holistic design approach that identifies the most cost-effective whole
building specification, often results in a reduction in capital cost.
5
The Value
Proposition
with a higher return
on investment...
Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions that have a capital cost uplift provide
significant operational cost reductions and offer rapid return on investment.
6
The Value
Proposition
lifetime operational
cost savings...
Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions feature envelope systems that
maintain their thermal performance over time, limiting the occupiers’ exposure to
escalating operating costs over the lifetime of the building.
7
The Value
Proposition
a future-proofed
building...
Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions drive higher rental income, maximise
occupancy levels, reduce operating costs, enhance asset value and minimise the risk
of rising fuel costs to provide ‘future-proofed’ buildings.
8
The Value
Proposition
and enhanced
BREEAM / LEED
ratings.
Additional BREEAM / LEED credits can be achieved, enhancing green building
credentials and providing market differentiation.
9
The Green
Agenda
Why do we need Cost Optimal
Energy Saving Building Solutions?
The UK needs Cost Optimal Energy Saving
Buildings to minimise the financial impact of
rising fuel costs in buildings therefore it is
essential to reduce lifetime operational costs.
Agriculture
& Land Use
9%
Exports
3%
UK sector carbon
emissions:
The building sector is
the largest producer of
carbon dioxide in the
United Kingdom.
Buildings in the UK account for almost 40% of the greenhouse gas
emissions released in the UK’s atmosphere. Building Regulations
Part L 2013 have implemented a 9% improvement in allowable
carbon emissions over the 2010 standard for non-domestic
buildings. From April 2018 it will be unlawful to let commercial
properties with an EPC rating of F or G (the lowest two grades of
energy efficiency). BREEAM requirements are becoming mandatory
for some councils in the UK while other property owners are
stipulating their own BREEAM requirements.
Source: www.gov.uk.
Buildings
38%
Transportation
24%
UK Gas Price Forecast
UK Electricity Price Forecast
0.070
0.300
0.060
0.250
0.050
0.200
£/kWh
£/kWh
3%
23%
People cause buildings to consume energy. We spend
approximately 90% of our life in buildings. The UK aims to cut
greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80%, from the 1990
baseline by 2050.
0.040
0.030
0.150
0.100
0.020
0.050
0.010
0.000
2010
Waste
Industry
2015
2020
2025
Normalised Ofgem average
2030
2035
Years
2040
2045
2050
0.000
2010
2055
National Grid
2015
2020
2025
Normalised Ofgem average
Therefore, the need to reduce energy consumption and carbon
emissions are significant issues for businesses. Holistic building
design, sustainable construction and the optimal operation of
buildings are now the top priority of regulatory, property investment,
tenant and individual corporate agendas.
10
2030
2035
Years
2040
National Grid
2045
2050
2055
Property Stakeholder
Advantages
Who
Benefits?
Developer
Tenant / Occupier
Why should I build a Cost Optimal
Energy Saving Building?
Why should I lease a Cost Optimal
Energy Saving Building?
Lower design
and construction
costs
Market
differentiation
Lower
refurbishment /
renovation costs
Higher
selling price
Faster
sales
Improved health
and reduced
absenteeism
Ability
to secure
finance
Rapid ROI
Increased
market value
Increased staff
productivity
Enhanced
business image
Legislation (EPC)
& CSR compliance
Occupier
comfort
Lower
operational
costs
Lower
transaction
fees
Lower
maintenance
costs
Reduced vacancies
Slower
depreciation
Reduced
downtime
Increased
occupancy rates
Lower exit yield
Owner
Why would I want to own a
Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building?
Source, modified: “The Business Case for Green Building.
A Review of the Costs and Benefits for Developers, Investors
and Occupants.” World Green Building Council, 2013.
11
Route to Net-Zero
Energy Buildings
Part L
2010 Compliant
Part L
20%
2013 Compliant
Less Carbon
40%
Less Carbon
Part L
Regulatory Compliance
20%
Carbon Reduction
BREEAM†
Pass > Good > Very Good
40%
Carbon Reduction
BREEAM†
Excellent
BREEAM†
Outstanding
LEED
Silver
LEED
Gold
†
BREEAM UK New Construction 2011 Method.
LEED
Certified
STEP
1
EnvelopeFirst &
Optimised Building Services
■
Building type, orientation and location.
■
Optimal envelope considering
STEP
2
■
- Thermal: U-values, airtightness and thermal bridges.
■
- Daylighting: heat loss, solar gain and daylight factor.
■
Optimal building services considering lighting design,
heating system, cooling system, hot water and Building
Management System (controls).
Insulate & Generate
Integrated LZC Technologies
Insulation to help further reduce heat loss/gain
considering the envelope insulation and the internal
building services insulation (e.g. duct/pipe insulation).
Installation of Low or Zero Carbon (LZC) technologies
such as solar photovoltaics*, solar air heating*,
solar thermal*, heat pump technology*, wind turbines*
and combined heat and power (CHP), etc.
*Available from Kingspan.
12
Route to Net-Zero
Energy Buildings
Pushing
the Envelope
BREEAM
LEED
We have now entered into an era of energy
efficiency and financial returns, where energy
saving buildings are designed, constructed,
operated and maintained with minimal cost.
50%
Less Carbon
Energy efficiency must always be addressed before considering
renewable energy. In order to achieve a cost optimal energy saving
building design it is essential that annual energy consumption is
minimised before incorporating low or zero carbon technologies.
Net-Zero
Energy Building
50%
Carbon Reduction
“By applying Kingspan’s three-step
process of EnvelopeFirst &
Optimised Building Services,
Insulate & Generate and Net-Zero
Energy Buildings, it is possible to
achieve a Cost Optimal Energy
Saving Building Solution.”
Net-Zero Energy
Buildings
LEED
Platinum
STEP
3
Net-Zero Energy
Buildings
■
Enhance LZC technologies already installed.
■
Introduce other LZC technologies.
■
Invest in off-site energy saving schemes
(known as ‘allowable solutions’ in the UK).
13
Route to Net-Zero
Energy Buildings
Three-step
Process
STEP
1
STEP
2
EnvelopeFirst
& Optimised Building Services
Insulate & Generate
- Integrated LZC Technologies
The first step, EnvelopeFirst & Optimised Building Services,
optimises the insulation, airtightness, heat loss/gain and daylight
The second step is called ‘Insulate & Generate’. At this stage,
additional enhancements to the building envelope and/or internal
design of the building envelope for its intended life, while also
ensuring the building’s services are geared to energy efficient
operation. It is of utmost importance that the building envelope is
appropriate before embarking on other energy efficient measures
as the building envelope tends to last the life of the building.
It is mandatory to get the design correct to ensure low operational
cost for the entire lifetime of the building.
duct/pipework are introduced and low or zero carbon technology
systems are added to further reduce its overall energy footprint.
Low or zero carbon technologies such as Kingspan Roof Mounted
PV Systems are perfectly suited to help reduce energy bills for
buildings with large roof area. Likewise, Kingspan Sol-Air, a thermal
air heating insulated panel system that channels passive solar heat
gain into the heating system, hence reducing its energy
consumption, is perfectly suited for buildings with fresh air
requirements. Other buildings may require different solutions,
including solar thermal, wind and even heat pump technologies,
all of which are available from one of the other divisions of
Kingspan.
The envelope must offer thermal performance suitable to the local
climate but it is not just the building envelope that must be
considered at this stage, it is important to take a holistic approach
to energy efficiency of internal plant. Important elements such as a
building’s daylighting design must always be carefully considered,
taking location and climate into account. Kingspan’s daylighting
systems can be incorporated into building designs to further
decrease energy consumption, by reducing the need for electric
lighting.
The energy saving solutions selected at this stage depend on a
number of variables including cost-effectiveness, building type,
internal demands, orientation, geographical location and climate.
“Building insulation is the most
cost-effective solution to reduce
energy and greenhouse gases.”
Source: McKinsey Global Institute.
Taking a holistic approach, the envelope and the internal heating
and cooling system should be designed simultaneously while
always considering cost. The size of the heating and cooling
system depends very much on the building envelope and it has
been found that improving the efficiency of the building envelope
reduces the size of internal systems and hence reduces their cost.
This also results in heating/cooling energy consumption reduction.
This approach often results in a lower capital cost for the building
envelope and heating/cooling system combined.
Energy efficient internal building services with intelligent controls
should also be included at this stage. Kingspan Insulated Panels’
building envelope products and solutions provide enhanced
thermal conductivity with low air permeability to ensure thermal
performance robustness throughout the building’s lifecycle.
The wide range of Kingspan roof, wall and façade insulated panel
systems, including daylighting, come in various colours and finishes
to suit any design requirement.
14
Route to Net-Zero
Energy Buildings
Three-step
Process
For business and building owners Kingspan Energy, a sub-division
of Kingspan Insulated Panels, offers the opportunity to maximise
the use of the roof space thus reducing their energy costs and
enhancing the value of their property without the need for any upfront
capital outlay. The 100% funded solution provided by Kingspan
Energy involves no upfront cost or capital risk to the end client.*
Client Commitment:
Our Commitment:
Client provides rooftop
lease to Kingspan Energy
for 25 years.
100% capital funding for
the rooftop solar PV system.
Provide 25 year combined
Kingspan roof and solar PV
system guarantee.
System performance and
maintenance.
Client Benefits:
Effectively, in return for a 25 year lease on the roof space,
Kingspan Energy will 100% capitally fund, design, project-manage,
install and maintain a bespoke optimised Roof Mounted PV System.
Reduced electricity costs
from Day One.
Future-proofed energy costs
in line with RPI inflation index.
25 year combined Kingspan
roof and solar PV system
guarantee.
The electricity generated by the system will be available to the host
company at lower rates than would otherwise be supplied from
the grid. As a result, the client will have the advantage of fixed
electricity costs, indexed to RPI (Retail Price Index), rather than
being exposed to volatile annual utility inflation rates.
Our Benefits:
25 year client rooftop lease.
Government Green Tariff
Incentive.
Income from Power
Purchase Agreements (PPA)
- client and utility.
*Note: the client is also able to self-fund the investment if preferred.
STEP
3
Net-Zero Energy Buildings
(NZEBs)
The final step is called ‘Net-Zero Energy Buildings’. The purpose of
this stage is to ensure that the overall annual performance of the
building balances out. This usually involves enhancing the
renewable energy technologies already incorporated in the building,
and may require investment in off-site energy saving schemes
called ‘allowable solutions’ in the UK.
Having applied the steps above to reach a given target it is
necessary to calculate the lifetime operational cost by incorporating
the cost associated to rising fuel costs and replacement of internal
plant (keeping in mind an improved fabric will reduce the cost of
internal plant). If the process is completed to reach different carbon
targets it is then possible to calculate a Return on Investment (ROI),
Net-Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR).
15
A ‘Holistic’
Design Approach
Holistic building design concentrates on the design of the whole building rather than
just focusing on a specific area, such as the design of the building envelope only.
Using a multidisciplinary collaboration approach it is possible to
design more accurately, more efficiently and at optimum cost.
For example, enhancing the building envelope provides the
opportunity to downsize internal building services, thereby often
reducing the capital cost for the whole building when costs
associated to the reduced plant size exceed the costs associated
to the enhanced envelope.
Holistic design is mandatory to reduce to a minimum the amount
of energy consumed. It is essential that various elements of a
building are designed in parallel to minimise unnecessary energy
consumption over the buildings lifecycle.
Holistic Building Design Inputs
Cooling
system
Building
orientation
Demands
Auxillary
(zones)
Geographical
location
Hot water
system
Heating
system
Lighting
design
Building
envelope
“The building envelope is critical for reducing
building energy loads. It is the starting point
for energy efficient buildings and the main
determinant of the amount of energy required
to heat, cool and ventilate.”
Federal R&D Agenda for Net-Zero Energy,
High-Performance Green Buildings Report, October 2008.
16
(fans, pumps,
etc)
Low / zero
carbon
technologies
Exemplar
Case Studies
Kingspan Insulated Panels has carried out extensive research in conjunction with AECOM,
a world leading building design consultancy, to identify the positive impact of more efficient
building envelopes for buildings in various parts of the UK.
Return on Investment (ROI) is a performance measure used to
evaluate the efficiency of an investment, or to compare the
efficiency of a number of different investments. To calculate ROI,
the benefit (return) of an investment (net of initial cost of investment)
is divided by the cost of the investment; the result is expressed as a
percentage or a ratio.
The calculations were based on four different building types:
Retail Warehouse, Speculative Office, Large Supermarket and
Distribution Warehouse, in three locations: London, Manchester
and Newcastle.
Each scenario was calculated using three starting building fabric
standards: backstop, notional and enhanced.
Net Present Value (NPV) is the difference between the present
value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows.
NPV is used in capital budgeting to analyze the profitability of an
investment or project.
Backstop: Less Insulation
Roof = 0.25 W/m2K / Wall = 0.35 W/m2K
Notional: Medium Insulation
Roof = 0.18 W/m2K / Wall = 0.26 W/m2K
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is the discount rate often used in
capital budgeting that makes the net present value of all cash flows
from a particular project equal to zero. Generally speaking,
the higher a project’s internal rate of return, the more desirable it is
to undertake the project. As such, IRR can be used to rank several
prospective projects a firm is considering. Assuming all other
factors are equal among the various projects, the project with the
highest IRR would probably be considered the best and
undertaken first.
Enhanced: More Insulation
Roof = 0.15 W/m2K / Wall = 0.20 W/m2K
Results are dependent on various parameters such as building
type, location, orientation, etc.
Having applied an envelope, a building specification is assigned
based on cost-effectiveness (applying the most cost-effective
changes first) to develop the capital cost model. Lifetime
operational costs are then calculated. It is then possible to
recognise financial benefits of various building specifications over
others in terms of Net-Present Value (NPV), Return on Investment
(ROI) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR).
For further information see:
http://www.kingspanpanels.co.uk/why-kingspan/valueproposition/
Holistic Building Design Methodology
Select building type,
location and orientation
Develop
thermal
model
Identify
Cost Optimal
Energy Saving
Building
Solution
17
Develop
capital cost
model
Rank building
improvements
in order of costeffectiveness
Develop
whole life
cost model
Develop
models for
each of the
54 scenarios:
3 locations
6 carbon targets
3 envelope
standards
Exemplar
Case Studies
Retail
Warehouse
■
Typical Retail Warehouse Building
going from Part L 2010 to
■
■
Part L 2013
■
■
using an enhanced envelope
achieves the following:
■
Capital Cost: £1,000 increase
NPV: Up to £17/m2 (40 years)
IRR: Up to 321%
ROI: Up to 10,744.9%
EPC: From B28 to B26
BREEAM Ene 01: From 4 to 6 credits
B
C ac
ap ks
ita to
lC p
os
t:
£3
.6
14
m
E
C nh
ap an
ita c
l C ed
os
t:
£3
.5
62
m
E
C nh
ap an
ita c
l C ed
os
t:
£3
.5
09
m
E
Ca nha
pi nc
ta e
lC d
os
t:
£3
.5
08
m
Building Parameters
Heated (20°C) and cooled (23°C), 8am to 6pm,
7 days per week with a floor area of 4,900m2.
Located in London.
1.4% reduced capital cost
and NPV up to £213,046
over 40 years
Part L 2010
Part L 2013
20%
Regulatory Compliance
Regulatory Compliance
Carbon Reduction
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
£3.508m
32.7
B28
4
£3.509m
30.1
B26
6
*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011. For LEED contributions, please contact Kingspan Technical Department.
18
£3.562m
26.0
A22
11
Retail
Warehouse
4.00
35
3.90
30
3.80
25
3.70
20
3.60
15
3.50
10
3.40
5
3.30
Carbon (kgCO2/m2/yr)
Capital Cost (£m)
Exemplar
Case Studies
0
Part L
2010
Part L
2013
20%
40%
50%
improvement
improvement
improvement
NZEB
Compliance
Capital Cost
Carbon Emissions
40%
50%
Carbon Reduction
Carbon Reduction
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
£3.754m
19.6
A17
13
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
Net-Zero Energy
Building
£3.805m
16.3
A14
14
**Confirmation of the impact of allowable solutions on EPCs and BREEAM credits is awaited.
19
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
£3.923m
0
**
**
Exemplar
Case Studies
Large
Supermarket
■
Typical Large Supermarket Building
going from Part L 2010 to
■
■
Part L 2013
■
■
using an enhanced envelope
achieves the following:
■
Capital Cost: £14,000 increase
NPV: Up to £9/m2 (40 years)
IRR: Up to 16.7%
ROI: Up to 223.7%
EPC: From B32 to B30
BREEAM Ene 01: From 0 to 4 credits
B
C ac
ap ks
ita to
lC p
os
t:
£3
.6
18
m
E
C nh
ap an
ita c
l C ed
os
t:
£3
.5
75
m
E
C nh
ap an
ita c
l C ed
os
t:
£3
.5
25
m
E
Ca nha
pi nc
ta e
lC d
os
t:
£3
.5
11
m
Building Parameters
Heated (20°C) and cooled (23°C), 8am to 6pm,
7 days per week with a floor area of 5,100m2.
Located in Newcastle.
1.2% reduced capital cost
and NPV up to £292,088
over 40 years
Part L 2010
Part L 2013
20%
Regulatory Compliance
Regulatory Compliance
Carbon Reduction
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
£3.511m
35.9
B32
0
£3.525m
33.0
B30
4
*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011. For LEED contributions, please contact Kingspan Technical Department.
20
£3.575m
28.8
B26
8
Large
Supermarket
4.20
50
4.10
45
4.00
40
3.90
35
3.80
30
3.70
25
3.60
20
3.50
15
3.40
10
3.30
5
Carbon (kgCO2/m2/yr)
Capital Cost (£m)
Exemplar
Case Studies
0
3.20
Part L
2010
Part L
2013
20%
40%
50%
improvement
improvement
improvement
NZEB
Compliance
Capital Cost
Carbon Emissions
40%
50%
Carbon Reduction
Carbon Reduction
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
£3.796m
21.5
A20
11
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
Net-Zero Energy
Building
£3.883m
17.9
A16
11
**Confirmation of the impact of allowable solutions on EPCs and BREEAM credits is awaited.
21
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
£4.017m
0
**
**
Exemplar
Case Studies
Speculative
Office
■
Typical Speculative Office Building
going from Part L 2010 to
■
■
Part L 2013
■
■
using an enhanced envelope
achieves the following:
■
Capital Cost: £22,000 increase
NPV: Up to £10/m2 (40 years)
IRR: Up to 12.5%
ROI: Up to 112.6%
EPC: From B35 to B31
BREEAM Ene 01: From 0 to 6 credits
E
C nh
ap an
ita c
l C ed
os
t:
£3
.1
42
m
E
Ca nha
pi nc
ta e
lC d
os
t:
£3
.1
20
m
Building Parameters
Heated (22°C) and cooled (24°C), 7am to 7pm,
5 days per week with a floor area of 4,500m2
(3 floors). Located in Manchester.
Part L 2010
Part L 2013
20%
Regulatory Compliance
Regulatory Compliance
Carbon Reduction
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
£3.120m
20.4
B35
0
£3.142m
18.0
B31
6
*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011. For LEED contributions, please contact Kingspan Technical Department.
22
£3.178m
16.3
B30
8
Speculative
Office
3.40
27
3.35
24
3.30
21
3.25
18
3.20
15
3.15
12
3.10
9
3.05
6
3.00
3
Carbon (kgCO2/m2/yr)
Capital Cost (£m)
Exemplar
Case Studies
0
2.95
Part L
2010
Part L
2013
20%
40%
50%
improvement
improvement
improvement
NZEB
Compliance
Capital Cost
B
C ac
ap ks
ita to
lC p
os
t:
£3
.2
35
m
En
C h
ap an
ita c
l C ed
os
t:
£3
.2
47
m
Carbon Emissions
7.8% reduction in
boiler size
40%
50%
Carbon Reduction
Carbon Reduction
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
£3.247m
12.2
A23
11
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
Net-Zero Energy
Building
£3.275m
10.2
A19
12
**Confirmation of the impact of allowable solutions on EPCs and BREEAM credits is awaited.
23
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
£3.342m
0
**
**
Exemplar
Case Studies
Distribution
Warehouse
■
Typical Distribution Warehouse
Building going from Part L 2010 to
■
■
Part L 2013
■
■
using an enhanced envelope
achieves the following:
■
Capital Cost: £0 increase
NPV: Up to £9/m2 (40 years)
IRR: No cost
ROI: No cost
EPC: From A24 to A23
BREEAM Ene 01: From 0 to 2 credits
E
C nh
ap an
ita c
l C ed
os
t:
£1
.4
86
m
E
Ca nha
pi nc
ta e
lC d
os
t:
£1
.4
86
m
Building Parameters
Heated (18°C), no cooling, 24 hours per day,
7 days per week with a floor area of 4,900m2.
Located in Newcastle.
Part L 2010
Part L 2013
20%
Regulatory Compliance
Regulatory Compliance
Carbon Reduction
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
£1.486m
24.5
A24
0
£1.486m
23.5
A23
2
*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011. For LEED contributions, please contact Kingspan Technical Department.
24
£1.562m
19.6
A19
7
Distribution
Warehouse
1.80
30
1.70
25
1.60
20
1.50
15
1.40
10
1.30
5
1.20
Carbon (kgCO2/m2/yr)
Capital Cost (£m)
Exemplar
Case Studies
0
Part L
2010
Part L
2013
20%
40%
50%
improvement
improvement
improvement
NZEB
Compliance
Capital Cost
B
C ac
ap ks
ita to
lC p
os
t:
£1
.6
53
m
E
C nh
ap an
ita c
l C ed
os
t:
£1
.6
79
m
Carbon Emissions
8.7% reduction in
energy consumption
40%
50%
Carbon Reduction
Carbon Reduction
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
£1.644m
14.7
A14
10
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
Net-Zero Energy
Building
£1.679m
12.2
A12
11
**Confirmation of the impact of allowable solutions on EPCs and BREEAM credits is awaited.
25
Capital:
kgCO2/m2/yr:
EPC:
BREEAM* Ene 01:
£1.768m
0
**
**
Green Building
Ratings
BREEAM
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental
Assessment Method) is the world’s leading environmental
assessment procedure.
“Recent analysis has shown
that Kingspan Insulated Panels’
products can contribute
directly up to 28% of credits
under BREEAM and up to 27
of the 110 points available
within LEED accreditation.”
BREEAM* is divided into 10 categories, each carrying different
weightings.
Pollution
Management
10%
12%
Land Use
& Ecology
Health &
Wellbeing
10%
15%
Waste
7.5%
Materials
12.5%
Energy
19%
Transport
8%
Water
6%
An additional 10% is awarded to innovation.
Kingspan Insulated Panels’ products can help achieve credits in the
following categories:
Materials
■
■
■
Green Guide Ratings of A+.
Compliance with ISO 14001:2004 demonstrating that products
contain responsibly sourced materials.
Environmental Profiling by the Building Research Establishment
(BRE) for certain products.
Energy
■
Reduction of carbon emissions and energy consumption.
■
Photovoltaic systems.
Health & Wellbeing
■
Free from Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC’s) emissions.
■
Daylighting and lighting solutions.
■
High performance accoustic solutions and advice.
Waste
■
Pallets, plastic packaging, etc, collected from site after delivery,
helping reduce on-site waste during construction.
Pollution
■
Reduction of NOx emissons from buildings.
■
Gutter/rainwater design calculations.
Innovation
■
Various innovation credits particularly in the ‘Energy’ category.
*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011.
26
Green Building
Ratings
LEED
LEED v4 (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design),
is the world’s second most widely adopted environmental
assessment method.
LEED is divided into 8 categories, again, each carrying different
weightings.
Location &
Transportation
Integrative
Process
1 pt
16 pts
Sustainable Sites
10 pts
Regional
Priority
Water
Efficiency
4 pts
11 pts
Innovation
in Design
6 pts
Indoor
Environmental
Quality
Energy &
Atmosphere
16 pts
Materials &
Resources
33 pts
13 pts
Kingspan Insulated Panels’ products can help achieve credits in the
following categories:
Materials & Resources
■
■
■
■
100% reusable.
Pallets, plastic packaging, etc, collected on site after delivery,
helping reduce waste on site during construction.
Insulated Panels typically contain 14.5% to 17.5% recycled
content.
Approved environmental profiling available for most products.
Energy & Atmosphere
■
Reduction of carbon emissions and energy consumption.
■
Photovoltaic systems.
Indoor Environmental Quality
■
Free from Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC’s) emissions.
■
Daylighting and lighting solutions.
■
High performance accoustic solutions and advice.
Sustainable Sites
■
Envelope solutions with high solar reflective coatings.
■
Gutter/rainwater design calculations.
Innovation in Design
■
■
27
LEED Accredited Professionals (LEED AP) working in the
business.
Products eligible for innovation on a project specific bases.
Kingspan Limited
Greenfield Business Park No. 2, Greenfield, Holywell, Flintshire, North Wales CH8 7GJ
t: +44 (0) 1352 717232 f: +44 (0) 1352 710161 www.kingspanpanels.co.uk
For the product offering in other markets please contact your local sales representative or visit www.kingspanpanels.com
Care has been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate, but Kingspan Limited and its subsidiary companies do not accept responsibility for errors
or for information that is found to be misleading. Suggestions for, or description of, the end use or application of products or methods of working are for information only
and Kingspan Limited and its subsidiaries accept no liability in respect thereof.
05/2014