Form AM (C)
Page 1 of 3
ANNUAL MONITORING REVIEW OF POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDENTS
FORM C
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CHAIR OF THE REVIEW PANEL TO PROVIDE THE BASIS FOR FEEDBACK
TO THE STUDENT)
In completing this form you should refer to the relevant sections of the Research
Degree Regulations (Part 9 of the UEL Manual of General Regulations) and the
UEL Code of Practice for Postgraduate Research Programmes.
This form is to be submitted to the nominated individual in the School - usually
the Research Administrator or Officer to the RDSC - within one week of the
annual review panel meeting.
The Annual Review at the end of a student’s first year is particularly
important and the Review Panel should consider especially carefully if
continuation on the programme is in the best interests of the student and
our university. Should a student withdraw, or be withdrawn, before the
end of their first year of enrolment or before they upgrade from MPhil to
PhD, there is no negative impact on our university’s PGR performance
indicators.
1. STUDENT’S DETAILS
FULL NAME
UEL STUDENT NUMBER
CURRENT MODE OF STUDY
(DELETE AS APPROPRIATE)
FULL-TIME
PART-TIME
MPHIL
MPHIL BY PUBLICATION
PHD VIA MPHIL
PHD DIRECT
PHD BY PUBLICATION
PROF DOC
PHD (EUR)
ENROLLED FOR
(Please Tick)
TITLE OF PROFESSIONAL/
PRACTITIONER DOCTORATE
PROGRAMME (IF
APPLICABLE)
TITLE OF THESIS
SCHOOL
REGISTRATION START DATE
(AS
PER REGULATION
NOTE
THAT
THIS
4.3,
PLEASE
IS
NOT
NECESSARILY THE SAME AS THE
DATE OF ENROLMENT)
Form AM (C) – Annual Monitoring Review of Postgraduate Research Students –
Form C Version 1.0
Form AM (C)
Page 2 of 3
2. THE REVIEW PANEL
CHAIR
OTHER MEMBERS
FORM AM (A)
FORM AM (B)
FORWARD PLAN
EVIDENCE CONSIDERED
(Please tick)
ORAL PRESENTATION BY STUDENT
PROGRESS REPORT
RECORDS OF SUPERVISORY MEETINGS
3. THE REVIEW
PLEASE DETAIL ANY ISSUES
YOU WISH TO BRING TO THE
ATTENTION OF THE SCHOOL
RESEARCH DEGREES SUBCOMMITTEE AND/OR THE
RESEARCH DEGREES
SUBCOMMITTEE,
INCLUDING ANY EXAMPLES
OF GOOD PRACTICE.
IS THERE ADEQUATE AND REGULAR SUPERVISION?
YES
NO
IS THERE A CLEAR ACCOUNT OF THE WORK TO DATE?
(Please delete as appropriate)
YES
NO
IS THERE A REALISTIC AND DELIVERABLE TIMETABLE OF FUTURE
WORK TO BE UNDERTAKEN? (Please delete as appropriate)
YES
NO
YES
NO
(Please delete as appropriate)
IS IT LIKELY THAT THE RESEARCH DEGREE PROGRAMME WILL BE
SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHIN THE PERMITTED
REGISTRATION PERIOD?
(Please delete as appropriate)
Form AM (C) – Annual Monitoring Review of Postgraduate Research Students –
Form C Version 1.0
Form AM (C)
Page 3 of 3
IS THERE EVIDENCE OF CRITICAL THINKING?
(Please delete as appropriate)
YES
NO
YES
NO
ARE THE NECESSARY RESOURCES AND SUPPORT TO ASSIST THE
STUDENT TO COMPLETE IN A TIMELY FASHION ARE AVAILABLE?
(Please delete as appropriate)
IF YOUR ANSWER TO ANY
OF THE QUESTIONS ABOVE
IS
‘NO’, PLEASE EXPLAIN
WHY AND DETAIL WHAT, IN
THE PANEL’S VIEW, NEEDS
TO BE DONE TO ADDRESS
THE DEFICIENCIES?
PLEASE DETAIL THE MAIN
POINTS THAT THE PANEL
WOULD LIKE THE STUDENT
AND SUPERVISORY TEAM TO
CONSIDER AS A RESULT OF
THIS REVIEW
4. RECOMMENDATION OF THE REVIEW PANEL
THE REVIEW PANEL RECOMMENDS TO THE SCHOOL RESEARCH DEGREES SUB-COMMITTEE
THAT: (Please Tick)
A) THE STUDENT’S PROGRESS IS SATISFACTORY AND THE STUDENT
SHOULD PROCEED TO THE NEXT YEAR
B) THE PANEL WISHES TO RECONVENE THE REVIEW PANEL WITHIN TWO
MONTHS TO CONSIDER A REVISED PROGRESS REPORT WHICH ADDRESSES
THE POINTS RAISED BY THE PANEL
C) THE STUDENT SHOULD BE WITHDRAWN
IF A RECOMMENDATION
HAS BEEN MADE THAT THE
REVIEW PANEL BE
RECONVENED THEN THE
CHAIR SHOULD DETAIL
HERE THE POINTS TO BE
CONSIDERED AT THIS
MEETING
SIGNED:
CHAIR OF REVIEW PANEL
DATE:
Form AM (C) – Annual Monitoring Review of Postgraduate Research Students –
Form C Version 1.0