Agenda
I. Welcome and Agenda Review
II. Summit Report
III. Governance Rules and Procedures Approval
IV. Regional Leadership Proposal
V. Fiscal Agent or Direct Funding
VI. Annual Plan Update
VII.3-Year Plan Update
Summit in Sacramento Report
•
•
•
•
•
Sylvia Thomas
Tammy Guzzetta
Michael Gray
Michael Lerner
JoDee Slyter
Governance Rules and Procedures
•
Review of Key Elements:
– Membership (8), 6 school districts, 1 county office, 1 community college district
– Partners contribute to discussions and decision making process
– Commitment of reporting any funds available for adult education
•
•
Budgets in alignment with consortium plans and seven program areas
Quarterly/annual expenditure reporting
– Official governing board representation
•
•
Governing board approved with documentation
Alternate with prior notification
– Participation in decision making
•
•
Communications and distribution of information
Key guiding principle: ABout Students, Collaborative Relationships, Collective Responsibility, Results
Driven, Representatives of all Stakeholders
– Equal voting rights per member, 1 vote per member
•
•
Quorum of 5 members needed for action
Tie votes result in additional discussion and revote
– Decision making process:
•
•
•
•
Information gathering facilitated by Point of Contact
Open discussion with consensus model
Public and partner comment opportunity
Motion is made official vote by each member
Governance Continued
– Decision-making Model
•
•
•
•
Committee met to create draft
Draft was distributed and posted
Discussion and edits incorporated
Vote of approval by members
– Open, public meetings
•
•
•
Agendas and minutes distributed to members and partners via email
Agendas published on member websites
Minutes published on member websites
– Considering public comment
•
•
Public comments encouraged at meetings and via email
Public comments shared with members during discussions and considered
– Distribution schedule of consortium funding
•
•
•
Review of mandates and state regulations/guidelines
Per comprehensive plan
In alignment with regional need
– Fund administrator or direct funding selection
•
To be determined
– Member additions and removals
•
•
Additions based on state definition
Removals based on inappropriate use of consortium funds, lack of reporting data, ineffectiveness or
consortium objectives, or jeopardizing the efforts of consortium.
Riverside
AEBG Block Grant Funding
AB104 Regional
Allocation
Riverside About Students Consortium
Riverside CCD
Alvord USD
Corona-Norco USD
Jurupa USD
Moreno Valley USD
Riverside USD
Grand Total
MOE
Total
$3,845,793
$0 $3,845,793
$0
$0
$0
$0
$133,495
$133,495
$0
$441,645
$441,645
$0
$503,695
$503,695
$0
$258,444
$258,444
$0 $2,550,548 $2,550,548
$3,845,793 $3,887,827 $7,733,620
CalWORKS
CalWORKS 1415 CCD
$0
$1,121,079
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,121,079
CalWORKS
Adult/ROC/P
Credit / Non-Credit CCD Apportionment
Total
ABE / ASE
$0
$0
$0
$0 $1,121,079 $12,310,200
$0
$0
$0
$169,874
$169,874
$0
$12,285
$12,285
$0
$22,107
$22,107
$0
$133,361
$133,361
$0
$337,627 $1,458,706 $12,310,200
CTE (Non
Credit Only)
AWD
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8,442
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8,442
ESL
Other
Total
$0
$0
$412,363 $12,731,005
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$412,363 $12,731,005
Adult
Correctional
Funds (K-12
Only)
Adult Perkins K12/COE/JPA
$0
$0
$0 $1,252,403
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $1,252,403
Basic Skills
Initiative
$0
$507,585
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$507,585
SSSP
NonCredit
WIA Title II
2014 (All
Grantees)
Grand Total
Total
$0
$0
$0 $3,845,793
$0
$0 $1,759,988 $15,612,072
$0
$0
$0
$133,495
$0
$807,358
$807,358 $1,418,877
$0
$105,812
$105,812
$621,792
$0
$557,110
$557,110
$837,661
$0
$917,980
$917,980 $3,601,889
$0 $2,388,260 $4,148,248 $26,071,579
Bylaws Draft
•
•
•
•
Standard format
Details Governance Rules and Procedures
Not required for submission with Annual Plan
Components:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Name and Purpose
Membership
Meetings
Governance
Committees
Staff
Fiscal
Regional Leadership:
Consortium Stability
• Review of Consortium Stability Overarching
Theme
• Review of previous meeting discussion
• Presentation of formal proposal
• Discussion
• Schedule vote
Fiscal Agent or Direct Funding
Fiscal Agent
Direct Funding
• Fiscal agent serves as a bank
• Processes allocation distributions
via warrant or wire transfer
• Certifies grant expenditures
prepared in accordance with
applicable federal and state
regulations
• Works with consortium to
implement fiscal decisions made
by members
• Is not an authority to approve
expenses applied against the
grant
• Is not the oversight for programs
and fiscal decisions.
• Consortium must roll up all
members funding and report
budget and quarterly
expenditures to the State
• Consortium must certify that the
grant expenditures have been
prepared in accordance with
applicable federal and state
regulations.
• Consortium must follow budget
and expenditure plans as agreed
upon by members according to
the plan submitted to the State.
5% Cap on Indirect
• Consortium dollars for 2015/16 = $192,290
• Does not include MOE indirect which is
available to recipients
• Available MOE indirect = $194,390
• Maximum Indirect = $386,680
Annual Plan Update
• Summary of Program Year 2015-16
– Description of vision and goals
– Milestones identified
• Services and Funding Allocations
– Workbook, spreadsheets, tables
• Action Plan
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Outcome targets
Integration of existing programs and transitions
Regional Assessment Plan
Addressing gaps
Accelerating student progress
Professional development
Leveraging existing regional structures
• Budget by Objective
• Level of Services and Assessment of Effectiveness
– Performance measures
Instructions:
Select the name of your consortium from the pull-down menu. Then, enter the names of each member of your consortium in blue-shaded cells in Table 1. Fill-out one worksheet
for each member of your consortium. Values entered in individual worksheets will rollup here on the summary tab.
Consortium Name:
R IV E RSIDE
Riverside
Table 1: Consortium Membership and AEBG Regional Allocations
Regional Consortium AEBG
Allocation
No High School Diploma
Unemployment
ESL/ELL
31%
AWD
Remaining
Consortium
Allocation
MOE
Poverty
Citizenship
Literacy
10%
9%
Alvord Unified School District
$0
$0
Corona-Norco Unified School District
$0
$0
Jurupa Unified School District
$0
$0
Moreno Valley Unified School District
$0
$0
Riverside Community College District
$0
$0
Riverside County Office of Education
$0
$0
Riverside Unified School District
$0
$0
Val Verde Unified School District
$0
$0
Total
$0
$0
12%
29%
17%
7%
14%
Table 2. Consortium Table by Program Type and Fund Source
Regional Consortium AEBG
Allocation
Remaining
Consortium
Allocation
MOE
WIOA Title II
(Adult
Education &
Literacy)
Adult Perkins
CalWorks
LCFF*
CCD
Apportionment
Adults in Jail**
Total
Adult Education (ABE, ASE, Basic Skills)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
English as a second language
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Pre-apprenticeship training
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Career and Technical Education
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Adults training to support child school
success
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Older Adults in the workforce
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Services for Adults with Disabilities
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
CCD
Apportionment
Adults in Jail**
Table 3. Consortium Member Table by Objective and Fund Source
Regional Consortium AEBG
Allocation
Remaining
Consortium
Allocation
MOE
WIOA Title II
(Adult
Education &
Literacy)
Adult Perkins
CalWorks
LCFF*
Total
Obj. 3: Seamless Transition
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Obj. 4: Gaps in Services
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Obj. 5: Accelerated Learning
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Obj. 6: Professional Development
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Obj. 7: Leveraging structures
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
*19 & older
*K-12/COE Only
3 Year Plan Revision
• Executive Summary
• Updates and changes to Objectives 1 & 2 data for
all 7 program areas
• Systematic Projection of AE system for 2017-18
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Placement into programs and services
Pre-apprenticeship training
Development of skills to assist k-12 academic students
Collection of data
Qualification of instructors
Alignment of academic content and curricula
Alignment of educational services