Diagrammatic Theory of Strongly Correlated Electron Systems Outline • Introduction Metal-insulator transition Intersite interactions in DMFT • Extended DMFT Pseudogap – Incoherent metal Luttinger’s theorem? Thermodynamics Transport • Anderson impurity model at finite U Motivation Definition of the SUNCA approximation Results of SUNCA • Summary Outline • Introduction Metal-insulator transition Intersite interactions in DMFT • Extended DMFT Pseudogap – Incoherent metal Luttinger’s theorem? Thermodynamics Transport • Anderson impurity model at finite U Motivation Definition of the SUNCA approximation Results of SUNCA • Summary Use of HTc Magnetic levitation (Japan 1999, 343 m.p.h) Magnetic resonance imaging Fault current limiters of 6.4MVA, response time ms E-bombs (strong EM pulse) 5000-horsepower motor made with sc wire (July 2001) Electric generators, 99% efficiency Energy storage 3MW Use of HTc Underground cable in Copenhagen (for 150000 citizens,30 meters long, May 2001) Researching the possibility to build petaflop computers Market $200 billion by the year 2010 Materials undergoing MIT High temperature superconductors (2D systems, transition with doping) Other 3d transition metal oxides (Nickel,Vanadium,Titanium,…) 2D and 3D, transition with doping or pressure Many f-electron systems Hubbard model – generic model for materials undergoing MIT E= -2t2/U E= 0 Dynamical mean-field theory & MIT mapping fermionic bath U Zhang, Rozenberg and Kotliar 1992 Doping Mott insulator – DMFT perspective Metallic system always Fermi liquid ImS(w)w2 Fermi surface unchanged (volume and shape) Narrow quasiparticle peak of width ZeFd at the Fermi level Effective mass (m*/m1/Z) diverges at the transition High-temperature (T>> ZeF) almost free spin LHB UHB quasip. peak Georges, Kotliar, Krauth and Rozenberg 1996 d Outline • Introduction Metal-insulator transition Intersite interactions in DMFT • Extended DMFT Pseudogap – Incoherent metal Luttinger’s theorem? Thermodynamics Transport • Anderson impurity model at finite U Motivation Definition of the SUNCA approximation Results of SUNCA • Summary Nonlocal interaction in DMFT? Local quantum fluctuations (between states ) completely taken into account within DMFT Nonlocal quantum fluctuations are mostly lost in DMFT (nonlocal RKKY inter.) (residual ground-state entropy of par. Mott insulator is ln2 2N deg. states) Why? Metzner Vollhardt 89 mean-field description of the exchange term is exact within DMFT J disappears completely in the paramagnetic phase ! How does intersite exchange J change Mott transition? Hubbard model For simplicity, take the infinite U limit t-J model: Outline • Introduction Metal-insulator transition Intersite interactions in DMFT • Extended DMFT Pseudogap – Incoherent metal Luttinger’s theorem? Thermodynamics Transport • Anderson impurity model at finite U Motivation Definition of the SUNCA approximation Results of SUNCA • Summary Extended DMFT J and t equally important: Si & Smith 96, Kajuter & Kotliar 96 mapping fermionic bath bosonic bath fluctuating magnetic field Source of the inelasting scattering Still local and conserving theory Long range fluctuations frozen Strong inelasting scattering due to local magnetic fluctuations Local quantities can be calculated from the corresponding impurity problem Fermion bubble is zero in the paramagnetic state Outline • Introduction Metal-insulator transition Intersite interactions in DMFT • Extended DMFT Pseudogap – Incoherent metal Luttinger’s theorem? Thermodynamics Transport • Anderson impurity model at finite U Motivation Definition of the SUNCA approximation Results of SUNCA • Summary Im Pseudogap – Incoherent metal highly incoherent response Pseudogap due to strong inelasting scattering from local magnetic fluctuations Not due to finite ranged fluctuating antiferromagnetic (superconducting) domains Local spectral function Outline • Introduction Metal-insulator transition Intersite interactions in DMFT • Extended DMFT Pseudogap – Incoherent metal Luttinger’s theorem? Thermodynamics Transport • Anderson impurity model at finite U Motivation Definition of the SUNCA approximation Results of SUNCA • Summary (m-ReS(0))/zt Luttinger’s theorem? A(k,w) d=0.02 A(k,0) A(k,w) ky k kx White lines corresponds to noninteracting system A(k,w) d=0.04 A(k,0) A(k,w) ky k kx White lines corresponds to noninteracting system A(k,w) d=0.06 A(k,0) A(k,w) ky k kx White lines corresponds to noninteracting system A(k,w) d=0.08 A(k,0) A(k,w) ky k kx White lines corresponds to noninteracting system A(k,w) d=0.10 A(k,0) A(k,w) ky k kx White lines corresponds to noninteracting system A(k,w) d=0.12 A(k,0) A(k,w) ky k kx White lines corresponds to noninteracting system A(k,w) d=0.14 A(k,0) A(k,w) ky k kx White lines corresponds to noninteracting system A(k,w) d=0.16 A(k,0) A(k,w) ky k kx White lines corresponds to noninteracting system A(k,w) d=0.18 A(k,0) A(k,w) ky k kx White lines corresponds to noninteracting system A(k,w) d=0.20 A(k,0) A(k,w) ky k kx White lines corresponds to noninteracting system A(k,w) d=0.22 A(k,0) A(k,w) ky k kx White lines corresponds to noninteracting system A(k,w) d=0.24 A(k,0) A(k,w) ky k kx White lines corresponds to noninteracting system Outline • Introduction Metal-insulator transition Intersite interactions in DMFT • Extended DMFT Pseudogap – Incoherent metal Luttinger’s theorem? Thermodynamics Transport • Anderson impurity model at finite U Motivation Definition of the SUNCA approximation Results of SUNCA • Summary Entropy ED: Jaklič & Prelovšek, 1995 Experiment: LSCO (T/t0.07) Cooper & Loram EMDT+NCA ED 20 sites d&m EMDT+NCA ED 20 sites Outline • Introduction Metal-insulator transition Intersite interactions in DMFT • Extended DMFT Pseudogap – Incoherent metal Luttinger’s theorem? Thermodynamics Transport • Anderson impurity model at finite U Motivation Definition of the SUNCA approximation Results of SUNCA • Summary Hall coefficient T~1000K LSCO: Nishikawa, Takeda & Sato (1994) Outline • Introduction Metal-insulator transition Intersite interactions in DMFT • Extended DMFT Pseudogap – Incoherent metal Luttinger’s theorem? Thermodynamics Transport • Anderson impurity model at finite U Motivation Definition of the SUNCA approximation Results of SUNCA • Summary Outline • Introduction Metal-insulator transition Intersite interactions in DMFT • Extended DMFT Pseudogap – Incoherent metal Luttinger’s theorem? Thermodynamics Transport • Anderson impurity model at finite U Motivation Definition of the SUNCA approximation Results of SUNCA • Summary Motivation •A need to solve the DMFT impurity problem for real materials with orbital degeneracy •Quantum dots in mesoscopic structures Several methods available to solve AIM: Numerical renormalization group (NRG) Quantum Monte Carlo simulation (QMC) Exact diagonalization (ED) Iterated perturbation theory (IPT) Resummations of perturbation theory (NCA, CTMA) Either slow or less flexible Auxiliary particle technique NCA Simple fast and flexible method Works for T>0.2 TK Works only in the case of U= Naive extension very badly fails TK several orders of magnitude too small Outline • Introduction Metal-insulator transition Intersite interactions in DMFT • Extended DMFT Pseudogap – Incoherent metal Luttinger’s theorem? Thermodynamics Transport • Anderson impurity model at finite U Motivation Definition of the SUNCA approximation Results of SUNCA • Summary Luttinger-Ward functional for SUNCA Outline • Introduction Metal-insulator transition Intersite interactions in DMFT • Extended DMFT Pseudogap – Incoherent metal Luttinger’s theorem? Thermodynamics Transport • Anderson impurity model at finite U Motivation Definition of the SUNCA approximation Results of SUNCA • Summary Scaling of TK Comparison with NRG Outline • Introduction Metal-insulator transition Intersite interactions in DMFT • Extended DMFT Pseudogap – Incoherent metal Luttinger’s theorem? Thermodynamics Transport • Anderson impurity model at finite U Motivation Definition of the SUNCA approximation Results of SUNCA • Summary Summary EDMFT • Purely local magnetic fluctuations can induce pseudogap suppress large entropy at low doping induce strongly growing RH with decreasing T and d • Luttinger’s theorem is not applicable in the incoherent regime (d<0.20) • Fermi liquid is recovered only when e*>J SUNCA • Infinite series of skeleton diagrams is needed to recover correct low energy scale of the AIM at finite Coulomb interaction U Extended Dynamical Mean Field Metal-insulator transition el-el correlations not important: band insulator: •the lowest conduction band is full (possible only for even number of electrons) •gap due to the periodic potential – few eV simple metal •Conduction band partially occupied semiconductor zt el-el correlations important: Mott insulator despite the odd number of electrons Cannot be explained within the independent-electron picture (many body effect) U eF* Several competing mechanisms and several energy scales Zhang, Rozenberg and Kotliar 1992 Doping Mott insulator – DMFT perspective Metallic system always Fermi liquid ImS(w)w2 Fermi surface unchanged (volume and shape) Narrow quasiparticle peak of width ZeFd at the Fermi level Effective mass (m*/m1/Z) diverges at the transition High-temperature (T>> ZeF) almost free spin LHB UHB quasip. peak Georges, Kotliar, Krauth and Rozenberg 1996 d Independent electron picture not adequate Yields both bandlike and localized behaviour Favor local magnetic moments Lead to a conventional band spectrum
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz