First selection step
Composition of the jury: One person from the research group does a first selection based on
the following criteria:
-
This selection must reduce the amount of abstracts to 20-30.
This step can be skipped if the number of abstract received is approximately 30 or less.
Each criteria (see below) is judged with: yes or no.
All criteria must be accomplished to continue the review process.
Criteria for the first step
1) Formal aspects required for the submission
2) Internal consistency of the work. Agreement among objective, methods, results and
conclusions
3) Relevance
Second selection step
Composition of the jury: Two teachers from the research group (both practitioners and
researchers, but if not at least one of each) and a student from the final year of the bachelor or
from a master.
-
This selection must reduce the amount of abstracts to 5.
1
Criteria for the second step
How do you think the abstract agrees with following sentences:
1) The topic of the abstract is relevant to physiotherapy and/or physiotherapy education
Completely disagree
0
1
2
3
4
5
Completely agree
2) The topic of the abstract is innovative for the profession in the clinical and/or research
field
Completely disagree
0
1
2
3
4
5
Completely agree
3) The topic of the abstract is relevant in an international perspective
Completely disagree
0
1
2
3
4
5
Completely agree
Final decision
Composition of the jury: one teacher from the ENPHE-board, one from the research group and
a student from the final year of the bachelor or from a master.
-
This selection must order the abstracts in winner, second and third.
Criteria for the final decision
How do you think the abstract agrees with following sentences:
1) The topic of the abstract is relevant to physiotherapy and/or physiotherapy education
Completely disagree
0
1
2
3
4
5
Completely agree
2) The topic of the abstract is innovative for the profession in the clinical and/or research
field
Completely disagree
0
1
2
3
4
5
Completely agree
3) The topic of the abstract is relevant in an international perspective
Completely disagree
0
1
2
3
4
5
Completely agree
2
Code of submission: ……………………………………
Reviewer: ………………………………………………………
First step
Yes
No
Formal aspects required for the submission
Internal consistency of the work. Agreement among objective,
methods, results and conclusions
Relevance
Reviewer: ………………………………………………………
Second step
How do you think the abstract agrees with following sentences:
4) The topic of the abstract is relevant to physiotherapy and/or physiotherapy education
Completely disagree
0
1
2
3
4
5
Completely agree
5) The topic of the abstract is innovative for the profession in the clinical and/or research
field
Completely disagree
0
1
2
3
4
5
Completely agree
6) The topic of the abstract is relevant in an international perspective
Completely disagree
0
1
2
3
4
5
Completely agree
Arguments:
3
Code of submission: ……………………………………
Reviewer: ………………………………………………………
Final decision
How do you think the abstract agrees with following sentences:
1) The topic of the abstract is relevant to physiotherapy and/or physiotherapy education
Completely disagree
0
1
2
3
4
5
Completely agree
2) The topic of the abstract is innovative for the profession in the clinical and/or research
field
Completely disagree
0
1
2
3
4
5
Completely agree
3) The topic of the abstract is relevant in an international perspective
Completely disagree
0
1
2
3
4
5
Completely agree
Arguments:
4