Corporate Equality Strategy 2012-2016 CONTENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Foreword Executive Summary Definitions Vision The Purpose of the Corporate Equality Strategy Linkages to National, Local and Corporate Priorities Linkages to other Strategies and Policies Corporate Requirements Equality Analysis Background and Context Outcomes Implementation and Resource Implications Arrangements for Monitoring, Evaluation and Review Appendix A Definitions Related To Equality Appendix B Statutory Equality Objectives 2012-2016 1. Foreword East Riding of Yorkshire Council recognises that disadvantage and discrimination exists in society, and that people may experience more than one form of discrimination at some stage. The Council is committed to striving to eliminate these inequalities and aims to be fair, reasonable and just in its responsibilities to its workforce, residents and those who are visiting the East Riding. The Corporate Equality Strategy is effectively a continuation of the Council’s Single Equality Scheme 2009-2012, but has been refreshed to include the duties imposed by the Equality Act 2010 and the Human Rights Act. This strategy outlines the actions the Council will be taking to; Eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation of East Riding residents and visitors Advance equality of opportunity for all people in the East Riding Foster good relations between people in the East Riding The Council has committed itself to making its services, facilities and resources accessible to residents and visitors to the East Riding. The Council will also work towards ensuring that individual Human Rights are supported within its decisions, policies and practices and that people are not discriminated against on the basis of age, disability, gender, gender reassignment, race, religion, pregnancy and maternity, marriage and civil partnerships and sexual orientation. Through the progression of the equality objectives that complement this strategy, the Council will ensure all our diverse communities receive Council services that are truly responsive to their needs and treat everyone fairly and with dignity and respect. The strategy will continue to provide a focus for promoting equality in all aspects of the Council’s functions, policies and services. This is a working document and we would welcome your views and comments to help us to learn and improve our services. Councillor Jackie Cracknell Nigel Pearson Portfolio Holder for Community Partnerships Chief Executive East Riding of Yorkshire Council East Riding of Yorkshire Council 2. Executive Summary The Corporate Equality Strategy has been developed as a continuation of the Single Equality Scheme, and it highlights the Council’s commitment to eliminating discrimination, harassment and victimisation, advancing equality of opportunity and fostering good relations in the workforce and for residents and visitors to the East Riding. Through the progression of the equality objectives that complement this strategy, the Council will ensure all our diverse communities receive Council services that are truly responsive to their needs and treat everyone fairly and with dignity and respect. 3. Definitions For the purposes of this strategy, the definitions related to equality at the Council can be found in Appendix A. There are other policies which provide protection against discrimination, harassment and victimisation if they are not incorporated in these definitions. 4. Vision Despite the challenging financial climate, the Council continues to have high ambitions for the future of the East Riding, as the area has significant opportunities and potential. The Council also remains highly ambitious for the organisation itself and strives to remain one of the top councils in the country. To focus on this aspiration the Council established, in 1996, a simple and powerful vision for the East Riding: “To improve the quality of life for our community; earn the respect of the people we serve and build pride in belonging to the East Riding of Yorkshire.” The strategy contributes to the Council’s vision by aiming to eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation, advancing equality of opportunity and fostering good relations which will improve the quality of life for the East Riding community. 5. The Purpose of the Corporate Equality Strategy In light of the vast legislative changes and the specific duties for the Council, it is apparent that a corporate approach is required to ensure that equality legislation is adhered to and equality is embedded within Council services, policies and procedures. Through the delivery of the ‘Our East Riding 2006-2016 East Riding Community Plan’ the LSP strives to ensure equality of access and a fair society. Furthermore, the Corporate Equality Strategy also incorporates the LSP Migrant Worker Action Plan and LSP Gypsy and Traveller Strategy to ensure that all activity related to equality and diversity is delivered with an integrated and co-ordinated approach. 6. Linkages to National, Local and Corporate Priorities The Strategy supports the Council’s Priorities by contributing to; Supporting Vulnerable People, Reducing Inequalities - supporting in times of need, protecting from harm and improving the quality of life Promoting Health, Wellbeing and Independence – helping people to stay healthy, strong and fit for the future Reducing Costs, Raising Performance – working with our partners to provide excellent service, effective governance and value for money The Strategy contributes to the reduction of crime and disorder as it incorporates the reporting and monitoring of hate crimes and discriminatory incidents. The Council will at all times recognise and respond to its legal obligations with regard to equalities and the Human Rights Act 1998. 7. Linkages to other Strategies and Policies This Strategy links to other Council policies including; Anti-Social Behaviour Policy Disabled Adaptations Policy Domestic Violence and Abuse Policy Feedback Policy Housing Allocation Policy This Strategy links to Council strategies including, 8. Human Resources Strategy Customer Contact Strategy Recruitment and Retention Strategy Workplace Strategy Workforce Placement Strategy Adult Education Strategy for Managing Diversity Health and Wellbeing Strategy Older People’s Strategy Promoting Independence Plan for Adults and Older People Children and Young People Strategic Plan East Riding Disabled Children’s Service Strategy East Riding Strategy for Children and Young People with Autistic Spectrum Disorder East Riding Young Carers Strategy Domestic Violence and Abuse Strategy Corporate Requirements East Riding Community Plan Revised in 2012, ‘Our East Riding’ is the East Riding Local Strategic Partnership’s (LSP) third Community Plan and provides a blueprint for the area over the period 2006 - 2016. The LSP is an umbrella partnership which brings together organisations from all sectors to work toward a common goal – our ambition for the area. The LSP provides a strong platform for joint working to stimulate innovation; it is also a vehicle for ensuring that public services are delivered in a strategic, cost effective and timely way. As partners, we are working together to ensure that the East Riding is a place where; Children and young people have a brighter future Older people enjoy a healthy independent lifestyle Communities are healthy, thriving, prosperous and safe Regeneration transforms deprived areas and reduces health and other inequalities We value and care for the diverse character of the area. 9. Equality Analysis An Equality Analysis has been completed for the Corporate Equality Strategy and it has been found that the strategy does not negatively impact on any protected group and that no major change is required as the strategy is robust and meets the equality duties. 10. Background and Context THE CURRENT LEGAL FRAMEWORK The Council recognises that disadvantage and discrimination exists in society, and that people may experience more than one form of discrimination at some stage. The Council is committed to striving to eliminate these inequalities and aims to be fair, reasonable and just in its responsibilities to its workforce, residents and those who are visiting the East Riding. This commitment is enforced by the Equality Act 2010. The Equality Act 2010 During 2011, the Equality Act 2010 was enacted by the Government. The general duty requires the majority of public bodies, including councils, to pay ‘due regard’ to; Eliminating discrimination, harassment and victimisation Advancing equality of opportunity Fostering good relations This duty covers nine protected groups, defined by law as; Age Disability Gender Gender reassignment Race Religion, faith or belief including lack of belief Sexual orientation Marriage and civil partnership Pregnancy and maternity Public Sector Equality Duty The Council, as well as other public bodies, is also subject to the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) whereby the Council by law has to publish information to demonstrate its compliance with the equality duty and develop and publish one or more equality objectives. ABOUT THE EAST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE East Riding of Yorkshire covers an extensive rural area of approximately 1,000 square miles which includes the coastal strip from Spurn Point to Bridlington across Holderness, Haltemprice and Goole and Howdenshire. The area has diverse communities ranging from rural villages in the Wolds and urban living around Hull, rural farming areas, market towns in Driffield, Goole, Beverley, Hessle, Market Weighton and Pocklington and the coastal towns of Bridlington, Hornsea and Withernsea. There is a population of around 334,200 people (Census 2011). Within the East Riding Age There is a growing population of people aged over 65, which results in higher levels of age related challenges including Long Term Conditions, general frailty associated with ageing and deteriorating cognitive functions (dementia). There is a lower than average birth rate. The population of children and working age groups is projected to decline due to employment opportunities outside of the East Riding, whilst a rise in the number of elderly people with chronic conditions will be a major challenge. Percentage change between Census 2001 and Census 2011 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Total population Total Households Age 0-14 Age 15-64 Age 65+ Males Females -5% -10% East Riding England & Wales Disability It is estimated that approximately 48% of the East Riding population lives with a disability including physical disabilities, hearing impairments, poor mental health and autism. (Source: Projecting Older People Population Information System and Projecting Adult Needs and Service Information.) Gender The gender split in the East Riding is approximately 50% men and women. Whilst life expectancy continues to increase in the East Riding, there is still a gap between life expectancy of males (79.2) and females (82.5) with people living longer in some parts of the East Riding than others. Census 2001 Males 153,050 Percentage of Population 48.7% Females 161,050 51.3% Census 2011 Percentage change 163,400 Percentage of Population 48.9% 170,800 51.1% 6.1% 6.8% Race Compared with the East Riding 2001 Census, the 2007 mid-year estimate shows that the Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) population has risen from 2.4% to 4.9%, and has increased again to 9.3% according to the 2009 mid-year estimates, showing that migration is increasing in the East Riding. The maps below are based on School Census data and show the change in the number of pupils who speak English as a second language from May 2009 to May 2012. There has been an increase of new migrants from Poland, Latvia and Lithuania, particularly in Goole, the West Wolds and Driffield areas. Furthermore, since 2009 there appears to have been an increase in Asian and Middle Eastern including Filipino migrants in the Haltemprice area. Religion and Belief According to the 2001 Census almost 80% of the population have identified themselves as Christian and 1.2% of the population is made up of other religions. The remainder of the population did not state anything or stated ‘no religion’. Sexual Orientation There are no local statistics for how many Lesbian, Gay or Bisexual (LGB) people live within the East Riding however, nationally, the Government estimates that 5% of the population are LGBT. Issues which affect those who are lesbian, gay or bisexual include substance abuse and perceived discrimination from service providers including doctors, housing providers and social care. Transgender There are no official statistics nationally or regionally regarding transgender populations, however GIRES (Gender Identity Research and Education Society) estimates that 1% of the population are gender variant to some degree (i.e. seeking or receiving treatment or undergoing or undergone transition). Currently within the East Riding there are approximately twenty residents who are undergoing the gender reassignment process (source: Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust). Marriage and Civil Partnership During 2011/12 the East Riding saw 948 marriages and 22 civil partnerships take place. This increase in marriages and civil partnerships follows the trend nationally, whereby there has been a 4% increase in marriages and a 2% increase in civil partnerships. East Riding Workforce The Equality Act 2010 ensures that the Council eliminates discrimination, harassment and victimisation within its workforce. The Council’s Workforce Survey is a key tool in ensuring that the Council is meeting its duties under equalities legislation. Age Of the total workforce, 50.3% are over 45 years old. Of the number of people aged 24-54 only 26.1% of women work full time compared with 73.9% of men. Disability Of the 98.5% who answered the question, 4.24% of the Council’s workforce indicated that they had a disability. Overall, members of staff who have a disability are well represented in the higher pay scales however they are under-represented within the schools workforce. Gender Of the total workforce, 62.9% of women make up the non-schools workforce whilst 84.6% of the schools’ workforce are women. 81.2% of women are paid on a scale point 14 and below. 55.3% of men are paid on a scale point 42 and above. 75.6% of all teachers are women. Race 1.85% of the Council‘s workforce declared themselves Non-White British, which is considerably lower than the national average of 3.93%. The Non-White British workforce consists of 0.75% White other, 0.25% Irish, 0.12% Indian and 0.11% Mixed Other as well as other ethnic minority backgrounds. Religion Of the 43% of staff who completed the 2011 Workforce Survey, 57.1% declared themselves as Christian and 31.5% declared themselves as having no religion. 2.6% indicated that they followed an ‘other’ religion. Sexual Orientation Of the 43% of staff who completed the 2011 Workforce Survey, 2% of the workforce identified themselves as being lesbian, gay or bisexual. Transgender There is no current information regarding transgender members of staff. Marriage and Civil Partnerships Of those who answered the 2011 Workforce Survey, 59.2% indicated that they were married and 0.5% indicated they were in a civil partnership. 11. Outcomes By looking at the demographics of the East Riding it is evident that there are many challenges which the Council faces in order to ensure that it meets the needs of the diverse community of the East Riding and its own workforce and also ensuring that the duties under the Equality Act 2010 are met. The Corporate Equality Strategy seeks to ensure that the Council is committed to eliminating discrimination, harassment and victimisation, advancing equality of opportunity and fostering good relations in the workforce and for residents and visitors to the East Riding. Outcome 1 – Statutory Duties are met All public bodies, including the organisation, have specific duties as stated in the Public Sector Equality Duty. As part of the duty, public bodies must publish information to demonstrate their compliance with the equality duty, and update this annually, and develop and publish one or more equality objectives and update these objectives at least every four years. Publication of Information All public bodies must produce information relating to people who share relevant protected characteristics who are: a) Its employees (for authorities with more than 150 staff) b) People affected by its policies and practices, for example service users. Employee Information The Equality and Human Rights Commission has suggested that an equality work profile could be developed in order to meet the needs of the duty. Additionally, further information such as recruitment and promotion and grievances should be disaggregated by protected groups in order to meet the Equality Duties. Information on Service Users and Functions Information on service users and functions of the Council must be disaggregated by protected characteristics as far as possible. This will ensure that decisions regarding policy and practices are based on clear information and not assumptions. Such information includes; The number of people accessing the service or participating in specific projects or programmes Customer satisfaction with services Performance information for functions and services relevant to the three aims, for example a school considers its key stage results and its exclusions broken down by protected characteristics Complaints about discrimination Details of and feedback from engagement with service users Quantitative and qualitative research with service users Records of how the Council has shown due regard to the three aims of the duty in terms of decision making, including equality analysis Details of policies and programmes that have been put in place to address equality concerns Equality Objectives The Council has prepared and published four equality objectives, which are specific and measurable. The purpose of setting such objectives is to help the Council, and other public bodies, better perform the general equality duty, focusing on the outcomes to be achieved. Equality objectives will help focus the Council’s attention on the priority equality issues in order to deliver improvements in policy making, service delivery and employment, including resource allocation. Outcome 2 – Partnership Working is maximised. The Council is committed to working in partnership across the range of public, private and voluntary agencies to promote equality, diversity and human rights. However, due to the changes occurring in the public sector and the ensuing scarce resources, new and innovative ways need to be explored to ensure that this partnership working continues resulting in the same successes which have been evidenced in previous years. Local Strategic Partnership (LSP) The Local Strategic Partnership (LSP) is a partnership that brings together organisations from public, private, community and voluntary sectors in a local authority area. The key objective of the LSP is to improve the quality of life in that area. Founded in 2001, the East Riding LSP is comprised of partner organisations from the public, private, voluntary and community sectors. Its key function is to develop and deliver a plan for the ongoing sustainable development of the area. Through this jointly developed Sustainable Community Plan, partners work together for the benefit of all East Riding residents and visitors, both now and in the future. LSP Action Groups In order to maintain partnership working, an equality adviser sits on the five LSP action groups (as shown below) and provides support and guidance on any equality issues which may arise when specific projects and work-streams are being discussed. Another aspect of the role is to challenge, progress and evidence areas where inclusion may be compromised by resourcing decisions. Such pieces of work have included; Domestic violence referrals from BME and LGBT communities Breastfeeding initiation rates in BME communities Equality Analysis of LSP strategies Any actions or issues related to equality and diversity work arising from the groups will be communicated to equality and diversity leads of partner organisations via the already existing virtual network, and the forming of time limited task and finish groups, as appropriate. Response to the ‘Hidden in Plain Sight’ Review Following the publication of the ‘Hidden in Plain Sight’ Review, the Council assessed that hate crime was probably being under-reported across all protected groups therefore making this a local priority. The Council, with its partners, understands that work is needed to be undertaken to recognise the extent and impact of harassment and abuse of all protected groups and take suitable action to prevent it from happening and intervene when it does happen. By working in partnership with other organisations, there will be a co-ordinated approach in minimising the impact of hate crime. Outcome 3 - Equality is embedded within Council services, policies and procedures. Embedding equality practice and procedure within Council functions will demonstrate to employees, residents and service users that these practices and procedures are no longer a ‘tick box’ exercise but is mainstreamed within all Council policies, practices and key decisions, and also Council functions meet the duties set out in the Equality Act 2010. Corporate Reporting Quarterly reports are presented at Directorate Management Team meetings, as well as Senior and Corporate Management Team meetings which discuss; Changes in legislation Update on Equality Analysis, including guidance in completing Equality Analyses, for example, for the Budget Reduction Strategy Update on discriminatory incidents Financial implications from the Translation and Interpretation Service Feedback from consultation and engagement events Updates on local demographic intelligence However, further work is to be undertaken to ensure that the right information is being reported in the correct way, and that this information is being used to inform decision making. Equality Analysis (EA) The Equality Act states that a local authority should record how it has shown due regard to the three aims of the duty in terms of decision making, which implies EAs should be completed. Although completing an EA is not an explicit legal duty, the Council believes that completing this process is critical in assessing the impact of key decisions and policy changes on protected groups and therefore has chosen to retain this process. It has been agreed in line with the new guidance that EAs need to be conducted for; A new or refreshed policy or strategy New or changed functions Service reviews, including transformation projects Major budgetary decisions It is important that the Council’s decision makers assess, understand and manage the impact of any key decisions that they make through the Equality Analysis (EA) process. As previous case law has shown that the courts may make local authorities repeat the decision making process again if an assessment of impact has not been completed or is seen to be a ‘tick box’ exercise, it is important that this process is completed properly and is robust in its conclusions. Further work is also required in monitoring any potential negative impact on protected groups, and allowing community groups to have their say on EAs. Equalities Monitoring As part of the Public Sector Equality Duty requirement to publish information showing how the Council is meeting the aims of the Equality Act 2010, it is clear that monitoring of who is or is not using our services is work which the Council needs to improve. The Council already knows that specific protected groups including economic migrants, Gypsies and Travellers and the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transsexual (LGBT) community and the disabled community often do not know what services are available to them or do not know how to access services even if they are aware of them. Improving knowledge of our residents through monitoring who is accessing our services will aid the Council in identifying protected groups who may not be accessing services or have specific barriers to accessing our services. By further monitoring the usage of services the Council will provide more accessible and appropriate services based on need. Clear and easily accessible information Making sure that all Council publications and documents are clear and easy to understand is a local priority based on feedback from several consultation events. Following consultation on the Equality Objectives it was felt by a number of groups that Council publications and documents could be written and communicated in a more simplified way. Feedback also showed that when documents had been requested in an alternative format such as Braille they were often not provided. By working with the various community groups, the Council seeks to identify appropriate communication channels and implement these within Council practices. 12. Implementation and Resource Implications The Corporate Equality Strategy will only be effective if all commitments and actions identified are implemented. Appendix B highlights the statutory and non-statutory objectives that the Council has prepared and published in order to meet the duties set out in the Equality Act 2010. It is envisaged that delivery of planned actions will address the objectives set out in this strategy. The Health, Diversity and Information Team will lead on the implementation the Corporate Equality Strategy throughout the Council, with the support from all Council officers and through Council processes including Service and Performance Planning. Work is currently under way to develop service ‘equality advisors’ and these officers will lead on driving forward the outcomes of the strategy. Furthermore, consultation and engagement will be resourced by contributions from partners. 13. Arrangements for Monitoring, Evaluation, and Review The Corporate Equality Strategy will be monitored, evaluated and reviewed as follows; Quarterly reports to Corporate Management Team and Senior Management Team highlighting corporate equality issues and barriers to progress Quarterly reports to Directorate Management Teams highlighting directorate specific equality issues Quarterly reports to the LSP Resource Advisory Group highlighting progress and key issues relating to partnership equality work Half yearly reports to Corporate Management Team, Corporate Issues Overview and Scrutiny Sub-Committee and Cabinet highlighting performance against the statutory Equality Objectives The Health, Diversity and Information Team will revise the Corporate Equality Strategy in July 2016. Appendix A The Council has adopted the following definitions: Protected Characteristic – these are grounds upon which discrimination is unlawful. The characteristics are; Age Disability Gender Gender reassignment Race Religion, faith or belief including lack of belief Sexual orientation Marriage and civil partnership Pregnancy and maternity Direct Discrimination – treating one person less favourably based on their protected characteristic. Indirect Discrimination - the use of an apparently neutral practice, provision or criterion which puts people with a particular protected characteristic at a disadvantage compared with others who do not share that characteristic, and applying the practice, provision or criterion cannot be objectively justified. For example, a blanket policy requiring all job applicants to hold a full driving licence, even for jobs where no driving is required, could result in indirect discrimination against disabled people because; A considerably smaller proportion of disabled people hold driving licences compared with non-disabled people It is to the disadvantage of disabled people because they cannot apply for employment, and It cannot be justified as there is no genuine occupational requirement to drive in the particular role. Institutional Discrimination – this occurs when “an organisation’s processes, attitudes and behaviour amounts to discrimination through unwitting prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness and stereotyping, which disadvantages identifiable groups or individual people” (based on Institutional Racism within the Lawrence Inquiry Report, 1999). Harassment - unwanted behaviour that has the purpose or effect of violating a person’s dignity or creates a degrading, humiliating, hostile, intimidating or offensive environment. Victimisation - subjecting a person to a detriment because they have done or there is a belief that they have brought an admission under equality legislation. For example, bringing proceedings under the Equality Act; giving evidence or information in connection with proceedings under the Equality Act; doing any other thing for the purposes or in connection with the Equality Act; making an allegation that a person has contravened the Equality Act. Advance Equality of Opportunity – this includes removing or minimising disadvantages suffered by people due to their protected characteristics and ensuring steps are taken to meet the needs of people from protected groups where these are different from the needs of other people. Fostering Good Relations – this is encouraging people from protected groups to participate in public life or in other activities where their participation is particularly low. Discriminatory Incident – where the victim or any other person believes someone is treated less favourable or is party to unwanted or uninvited behaviour that is offensive, embarrassing, intimidating or humiliating because of their race, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion, faith or belief or disability. The Human Rights Act 1998 - the Human Rights Act came into effect in the UK in October 2000. The Act enabled people in the UK to take cases about their human rights to a UK court. Previously they had to take complaints about their human rights to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. Appendix B STATUTORY EQUALITY OBJECTIVES 2012 - 2016 Objective 1 Ensure that the Council’s decision makers assess, understand and manage the impact of their key decisions on protected groups. Rationale It is important that the Council’s decision makers assess, understand and manage the impact of any key decisions that they make through the Equality Analysis (EA) process. Key decisions include the impact of new or revised policies and strategies; introduction of new or changes in service and budget reductions. As previous case law has shown that the courts may make local authorities repeat the decision making process again if an EA has not been completed or is seen to be a ‘tick box’ exercise, it is important that this process is completed properly and is robust in its conclusions. Consultation In setting this objective, consultation has shown that both service users and staff feel that this objective is of the most importance. Having a robust process whereby the impact of decisions is carefully considered will help the Council in seeking to eliminate any discrimination in the decisions that they make and reassure residents that the full implications of decisions on protected groups are known and addressed. Equality Act aim(s) met Protected Affected Eliminating discrimination, harassment and victimisation Advancing equality of opportunity Fostering good relations Groups All protected groups. Previous EAs have shown that the majority of decisions across the Council, including changes in policy and budget reductions, have an impact on; Older People (over 65) – 70, 824 (source: ONS 2010) People with disabilities – 15,950 on DLA (source: DWP Q2 2011) 38,900 self-declared (source: Annual Population Survey 2010) Women – 171,510 (source ONS 2010) Corporate Priority, Supporting Vulnerable People, Reducing Inequalities Corporate Value, Maximising Our Potential relevant Strategy Reducing Costs, Raising Performance Equality Strategy Performance INTI PSP 03 - Number of formal challenges to key decisions made Indicator used to via Equality Analysis measure progress against this outcome Key Risks Legal/Regulatory Reputational Objective 2 The Council improves its knowledge of its residents to better provide accessible and appropriate services. Rationale As part of the Public Sector Equality Duty requirement to publish information showing how the Council is meeting the aims of the Equality Act 2010, it is clear that monitoring of who is or is not using our services is an issue on which the Council needs to improve. The Council already knows that specific protected groups including economic migrants, Gypsies and Travellers and the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transsexual (LGBT) community often do not know what services are available to them or do not know how to access services even if they are aware of them. By improving knowledge of our residents through monitoring who is accessing our services this will aid the Council in identifying other protected groups who may not be accessing services or have specific barriers to accessing our services. By further monitoring the usage of services the Council will provide more accessible and appropriate services based on need. Consultation In setting this objective, both service users and staff felt that this objective was of high importance as providing accessible services is key to eliminating discrimination, and also allowing people to participate in every day life thereby advancing equality of opportunity. Equality met Protected Affected Act aim(s) Eliminating discrimination, harassment and victimisation Advancing equality of opportunity Fostering good relations Group All protected groups. Current evidence suggests that economic migrants, Gypsies and Travellers and the LGBT community have difficulty accessing Council services. Economic migrants – 6,700 (source: ONS 2009 based on ‘White Other category) Gypsies and Travellers – TBC LGBT Community – 20,321 (source: Government figures based on 6% of population of East Riding 2010) Corporate Priority, Supporting Vulnerable People, Reducing Inequalities Corporate Value, Maximising Our Potential relevant Strategy Reucing Costs, Raising Performance Equality Strategy Performance Indicator INTI PSP 01 - Percentage of staff who believe that the Council is used to measure committed to equalities and valuing difference progress against this outcome Key Risks Legal/Regulatory Customer Objective 3 The Council, working with its partners, seeks to minimise the impact of hate crime. Rationale Following the publication of the Pilkington Review, the Council assessed that hate crime was probably being under-reported across all protected groups therefore making this a local priority. From April 2011 to December 2011, the East Riding area (C Division) had 147 reported hate crimes and incidents, as shown in the table below. This is the second lowest number of reported hate crimes and incidents in the Humber area. Total Racial Religious Homophobia Transphobia Disability C Crimes 77 60 Division Hate 70 54 incidents Total 147 114 1 14 1 1 0 14 0 2 1 28 1 3 The Council, with its partners, understand that work is needed to be undertaken to recognise the extent and impact of harassment and abuse of all protected groups and take suitable action to prevent it from happening and intervene when it does happen. By working in partnership with other organisations, there will be a co-ordinated approach in minimising the impact of hate crime. Consultation Following consultation on the objectives, it was found that this objective was a priority for service users, particularly those from disabled communities who felt that this affected them the most. Therefore, achieving this objective will provide better reporting and feedback processes for victims of hate crimes and ultimately build confidence for victims to report such abuse and harassment. This will allow the Council and its partners to become more effectively engaged and to get to the root of such issues. Equality Act aim(s) met Eliminating discrimination, harassment and victimisation Advancing equality of opportunity Fostering good relations Protected Group Affected All protected groups. Corporate Priority, Corporate Value, relevant Strategy Supporting Vulnerable People, Reducing Inequalities Promoting Health, Wellbeing and Independence Anecdotal evidence suggests that disabled people are most affected by hate crimes in the East Riding currently. Disabled people – 15,950 on DLA (source: DWP Q2 2011) 38,900 self-declared (source: Annual Population Survey 2010) Equality Strategy Performance INTI PSP 04 - Number of discriminatory incidents reported to the Council Indicator used to measure progress against this outcome Key Risks Partnership Legal/Regulatory Reputational Objective 4 Ensure that all Council publications are clear and easily understood. Rationale Making sure that all Council publications and documents are clear and easy to understand is a local priority based on feedback from several consultation events. Following consultation on the Equality Objectives, it was felt by a number of groups that Council publications and documents could be written and communicated in a more simplified way. Feedback also showed that when documents had been requested in an alternative format such as Braille they were often not provided. Consultation From feedback from consultation, this objective is a priority for service users especially those who have a disability and those from an ethnic minority background. Providing publications and documents in the requested and correct format will allow service users to access information easily, advancing equality opportunity and eliminating any potential discrimination. Equality Act aim(s) met Protected Affected Group Eliminating discrimination, harassment and victimisation Advancing equality of opportunity Fostering good relations Disabled people – 15,950 on DLA (source: DWP Q2 2011) 38,900 self-declared (source: Annual Population Survey 2010) BME - 23,500 (source: ONS 2009) Golden thread link Supporting Vulnerable People, Reducing Inequalities to: Corporate Priority, Corporate Equality Strategy Value, relevant Strategy Performance INTI PSP 05 - Percentage of service users satisfied with the Indicator used to translation and interpretation service measure progress against this outcome Key Risks Legal/Regulatory INTERNAL EQUALITY OBJECTIVES 2012 - 2016 Objective 1 Statutory duties are met. Performance INTI PSP 03 - Number of formal challenges to key decisions made via Indicator used to Equality Analysis measure progress against this outcome Key Risks Legal/Regulatory Reputational Key Delivery Actions Completion Services/Teams Date Involved Publication of Information Ensure that the Publication of Information is updated 1.1 annually. March 2013 Ensure that there is regular reporting on progress December 1.2 with the Publication of Information duty. 2012 Equality Objectives Ensure that Equality Objectives are fit for purpose 1.3 and relevant to the Council. March 2013 Ensure that progress with the Equality Objectives are December 1.4 reported six monthly to SMT, CMT and Members. 2012 Horizon Scanning Respond to all changes in equalities legislation, as 1.5 appropriate. On going Objective 2 Partnership working is maximised. Performance Indicator INTI PSP 01 - Percentage of staff who believe that the Council is used to measure committed to equalities and valuing difference progress against this outcome Key Risks Key Delivery Actions Completion Date The Joint Equality and Diversity Board 2.1 Develop a process for an Equality representative from ERYC and NHSERY to attend the LSP Action Group meetings for Health, Care and Wellbeing, Community December Safety Partnership and the Children’s Trust to provide 2012 support and guidance on equality issues. 2.2 Develop a process for all equality issues identified at the LSP Action Group to be reported to other partners March 2013 and the LSP Resource Advisory Group. 2.3 Develop a model for an annual Partners Equality and March 2013 Diversity ‘Working Together’ Workshop. Humber Network 2.4 Ensure that the Humber Network is fit for purpose. March 2013 Consultation and Engagement 2.5 Continue to strengthen the role of the Disability January 2013 Advisory and Monitoring Group. 2.6 Explore the feasibility of developing other consultation March 2013 and engagement groups, for example BME Panel. 2.7 Evaluate the effectiveness of the quarterly resident’s March 2013 Equality and Diversity Newsletter 2.8 Work with the Performance Team to develop the December Consultation and Engagement Strategy. 2012 Services/Teams Involved Objective 3 Equality is embedded within Council services, policies and procedures. Performance Indicator used to measure progress against this outcome INTI PSP 01 - Percentage of staff who believe that the Council is committed to equalities and valuing difference INTI PSP 02 - Percentage of staff who feel that they are treated with fairness and respect by the Council Key Risks Partnership Legal/Regulatory Reputational Key Delivery Actions Completion Date Equality and Diversity Programme Team Revitalise the Equality and Diversity Programme 3.1 Team. January 2013 Ensure there are appropriate reporting mechanisms between the new Equality and 3.2 January 2013 Diversity Programme Team and senior managers and partners. Strengthening Links Strengthen reporting of equality and diversity 3.3 issues to SMT, CMT and Members. January 2013 Strengthen links to corporate policies 3.4 strategies that have equality implications. and March 2013 Staff Development Explore the feasibility of staff forums based on a 3.5 protected category. June 2014 Develop and publicise a staff equality and diversity 3.6 newsletter. June 2014 Develop equality training appropriate for all 3.7 Council staff. June 2014 Services/Teams Involved
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz