Finance Panel Managing the Finance Team June 2008 Data analysed by Aretai Innovation in Performance | Page 1 Background • In an earlier MPF study it was found that the typical FD of a professional services Firm spent more time working on issues regarding his team as he did on most technical and advisory matters • The MPF Finance committee decided to examine these matters in more detail by a follow up study • The data in this presentation is drawn from the second study which was conducted in May and June 208 30 25 20 15 26 10 18 15 13 14 14 5 0 CEO Advice Change management Practice Support Reporting Team management Technical % of time | Page 2 Executive Summary Aretai Innovation in Performance The typical Finance function team of a Professional Services Firm is A team of 48 people Supporting a Firm of 139 partners With fee income of £191 million and an median efficiency rating (Revenue per FTE) of £3m The FD spends between 10 and 15 hours a week supervising his team directly The FD will typically have between 4 and 5 direct reports Tenure of the team is high. Most team members stay with their Firms between 5 and 6 years The vast majority of the Finance team is in Accounts Payable Training of Finance teams if heavily weighted towards technical training 20-25% of a typical Finance team consists of qualified professionals © Aretai Limited - 2007 | Page 3 Demographics of study Respondents 90 77 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 15 10 4 4 0 Global NA UK EME | Page 4 Demographics of study - Sector Respondents 70 65 60 50 % 40 30 23 20 10 8 4 0 Accountancy Law MC RE | Page 5 Demographics of study – Firm size Respondents 60 50 50 % 40 30 23 23 20 10 4 0 Less 250 250-1000 1000-10000 10000+ Headcount | Page 6 Team size and efficiency • The number of heads in Finance teams amongst respondents ranged from 4 to 300 • On average just under half the team is engaged in Accounts Payable and Receivable matters • Planning and Statutory reporting roles account for 10-15% of team members • Very few permanent heads are employed in Tax or Payroll function, perhaps reflecting the proliferation of advisors (Tax) and outsourcing (Payroll) • More tax heads in a global function (up to 18%) • Median revenue per FTE is £3m • Range of revenue per FTE is £750,000 to £7.3m • On average Real Estate functions tend to be more efficient than Law Firms • There appears to be little correlation between efficiency and Firm size (economies of scale not obvious in the survey) | Page 7 Revenue per FTE Revenue per FTE 6 5 Count 4 3 2 1 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 Revenue £000 | Page 8 Revenue per FTE by sector Revenue per FTE 6 5 4 MC Acc 3 Law RE 2 1 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 | Page 9 Revenue per FTE – by Firm size Revenue per FTE 6 5 4 10k+ 1k-10k 3 251-1k Less 250 2 1 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 | Page 10 Supervision of team • The FD spends between 10 and 15 hours a week managing the Finance team • Equates to an FD working week of between 56 and 83 hours!! • The FD typically has 5 direct reports • Over a third of FD’s have more than 5 direct reports • Law FD’s tend to have more direct reports than counterparts in other sectors • 85% of FD’s are happy with the number of direct reports they have | Page 11 Supervision hours 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 50-55 Hours supervising team | Page 12 Direct Reports 40 35 35 30 % 25 19 20 15 15 15 4 5 15 10 5 0 2 3 5+ Direct Reports | Page 13 Law vs Real Estate – Direct Reports 50 47 45 40 35 33 % 30 Law 25 RE 20 18 17 18 17 17 17 15 12 10 6 5 0 2 3 4 5 5+ Direct Reports | Page 14 Tenure of team • The median average team member has been in the PSF Finance function for between 5 and 6 years • However over 30% have a tenure in excess of 7 years • Only 4% tend to stay with their Firm less than 3 years • Interesting to compare to FD tenure • Legal teams have, on average, a slightly longer tenure than their counterparts in Accountancy and Real Estate • Is there a link to average efficiency here? • The overwhelming majority of FD’s are comfortable with this level of tenure/turnover • No one thought it was too high…… a couple of (brave) respondents thought it was too low | Page 15 Tenure of FD’s 70 65 60 50 40 PSF 31 Current Role 30 23 21 19 20 15 10 6 6 6 8 0 <1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years 5-10 years 10 years + | Page 16 Average tenure of team members Tenure 20 18 16 14 % 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Less 2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 10+ Years | Page 17 Training, qualifications and appraisal • 20-25% of team members are professionally qualified • About the same are studying for professional qualifications • No significant difference in approach in this regard between Firm size or sector • Vast majority of Firm offer some sort of training to Finance team members • About 2/3 of such training is technical in nature with training in ‘behavioural or people matters’ constituting another 25% of training time • Appraisal of staff are universal with the majority favouring annual rather than six monthly appraisal • An appraisal will last between 45-60 minutes for most Firms and 77% of FD’s think that’s about right • Just under a quarter of you consider it too little | Page 18 Qualified staff Qualified accountants 25% % Respondents 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Less 5 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 45-50 50-55 % in team | Page 19 Nature of training for team Training 4 4 27 Technical Behavioural Comms None 65 | Page 20 Team location • Just under 60% of the survey respondents had teams organised on a multi site basis with the remainder having teams in a single location • The advantages of a multi site strategy are reported as – Getting close to customers – Local knowledge and – Meeting local demands • The advantages of a single site strategy are reported as – – – – – Efficiency Better communication One team culture Segregation of duties Cost was infrequently mentioned | Page 21 Team interaction • Less than half of the teams surveyed had formal team building days organised for them • Where they are held they are universally seen to be useful – Builds rapport – Helps understanding of roles, use Belbin – Interpersonal issues can be managed • Rather more popular were visits to other departments – – – – • Develops cross functional assistance Helps team to understand the Firm Improves mutual understanding Finance brand can be better communicated Nearly 2/3 of teams complete employee surveys and morale seems good – Positive and improving – Like work environment, dislike low recognition for effort – A ¼ glass half empty, ¾ glass half full | Page 22 You all understand how important this is • Sometimes its like spinning plates, light touch but keeping an eye on them all • Achievement is about having good people and giving them scope • It’s people, people, people • An FD is only as good as the people in their team • As an accountant technical knowledge helps, but managing our people is much more of a challenge • Listen, learn adapt – provide support, provide challenge – find and develop the hidden talent | Page 23 Finance Panel Aretai Innovation in Performance
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz