THREE RIVERS DISTRICT COUNCIL BEST VALUE PERFORMANCE PLAN 2004/05 CONTENTS Foreword Page 2 The Council’s Vision and Partnership Working Page 3 The Council’s Strategic Plan Page 4 Themes, Policy Priorities and High Level Outcomes 2004/05 Page 5 Improvement Planning Page 6 BVPI’s – To Monitor Progress Against Policy Priorities (Outturn 2003/04 and Targets 2004/05, 2005/06, 2006/07) Page 7 Tackling Anti-Social Behaviour Page 7 Supporting The Vulnerable Page 8 Protecting The Greenbelt Page 10 Green And Clean Open Spaces Page 11 Providing A Mix Of Leisure Facilities For All Ages Page 12 BVPI’s – To Monitor Progress Against Corporate Governance Page 13 BVPIs - To Monitor Progress Against Services Not Directly Linked To Policy Priorities Page 15 User Satisfaction Surveys – Base Numbers and Confidence Intervals Page 17 Procurement – Statement On Contracts Awarded During 2003/04 Page 19 1 FOREWORD The production and publication of the annual Best Value Performance Plan (BVPP) is a key element and statutory requirement of best value. It provides us with the opportunity to clearly state our ambitions and priorities and what we expect of our services over the next three years, as well as reporting how well we have done over the previous year. You will see that in this years BVPP all BVPI’s are set against either policy priorities, corporate governance or other i.e. those not assigned to policy priorities or corporate governance. This is a change from previous BVPP’s, which set BVPI’s against the portfolios for each of the Policy Panels. The change will inform the local community, our partners and ourselves of progress in improving those services that contribute to the agreed themes and priorities for the district and which can enhance the quality of life in the local area. This overall approach also goes some way to address a key issue raised by the CPA Inspection team (January 2004) which questioned the effectiveness and process of how the Council determines its priorities and how we measure progress against them. We are also aware that we need to monitor and in some cases improve services that may not be directly linked to our priorities but are contextual and reflect our underlying capacity and overall performance, such as how we manage staff, finances, and assets. The overall content of this BVPP is somewhat reduced from previous years. This is as a result of revised guidance on BVPP’s issued by the ODPM, whereby it is no longer a requirement to include information that is now available from other sources. It also reflects our ‘Good’ CPA category following an inspection carried out by the Audit Commission in January 2004. The outcome of these changes is that our BVPP 2004/05 is made up of several key elements; The Three Rivers Strategic Plan, which provides a statement of our Vision, identifies the agreed shared themes and priorities with our partners, sets out our policy priorities against each of the themes and a number of high level outcomes. Improvement Planning against our policy priorities which provides a timetable for improving all BVPI’s over a 2-year period. Our aim is for all BVPI’s related to policy priorities to be in the top quartile in 2005/06 and for all other BVPI’s to be in the upper quartiles within the same timeframe. Our outturn for BVPI’s 2003/04 and targets for BVPI’s for 2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07. A statement on contracts awarded during 2003/04. 2 CONTENTS The Council’s Vision and Partnership Working The Council has a Vision of what it wants to achieve for the District that complements national objectives. It is that ““Three Rivers should be a prosperous, safe and healthy place where people want and are able to live and work”. Three Rivers District Council understands that to achieve this vision it needs to work in partnership with other statutory bodies and other organisations that operate in the area. Therefore, in consultation with other partners across the district, the Council has developed a Local Strategic Partnership.1 The aim of the partnership is to join up and better co-ordinate the work of all agencies across the District. By working as part of a Local Strategic Partnership the Council is better able to contribute wherever it can. In addition to the Local Strategic Partnership, Three Rivers District Council welcomes the opportunity to work with other organisations to tackle local issues. Examples of our partnership working with voluntary and statutory agencies include Hertfordshire Environmental Forum, Hertfordshire Prosperity Forum and the Health Partnership Board. Three Rivers is also part of the East of England Regional Assembly and an active participant in the East of England Local Strategic Partnership Network. A Community Strategy was agreed by the Local Strategic Partnership in March 2003. It aims to improve the economic, social and environmental well-being of the District and is the vehicle through which we seek to achieve government targets as well as meeting local priorities. The Strategy is based on four key themes, which reflect all the partners’ shared priorities: 1 Healthy Communities Prosperous Communities Safer Communities Sustainable Communities. Members of the Local Strategic Partnership (LSP) are Police and Police Authority, Three Rivers District Council, Herts. County Council, Primary Care Trust and Council for Voluntary Service. 3 Making Sense of all this for our Staff - The Council’s Strategic Plan District Themes. - Three Rivers District Council has adopted the four Themes of the Community Strategy as a focus for its work across the District. They represent priority areas for delivery in the Community Strategy for 2003 to 2008. They naturally, therefore, form the foundation on which to develop and deliver the Strategic Plan. Also contributing to these themes will be a range of other Strategies and Plans such as Implementing Electronic Government Statement, Best Value Performance Plan, Medium Term Financial Plan, and Cultural Strategy. These are further underpinned by individual Service Plans and Team Action Plans. Policy Priorities have been identified for 2004/05 to bring about the Council’s contribution to the District Themes and departments within the Council are responsible individually and collectively for their successful delivery. Short term priorities for the Council, which are set against the context of the District Themes, are reviewed by Elected Members on an annual basis. These priorities are there to provide an immediate focus for improvement and make a direct contribution in achieving the District Themes. High Level Outcomes - Specific outcomes have been identified against each of the Policy Priorities. Wherever possible they include performance targets that are either time based or are quantifiable measures. Corporate Governance - A range of activities exist under the general heading of Corporate Governance. These are services which cannot be directly assigned to specific priorities but which make a contribution on a corporate basis. Under this heading we include Council Tax and NNDR Accountancy and Treasury Personnel Property & FM Legal Elections Housing Policy Corporate Management ITC / Web development Communications 4 The Strategic Plan - Themes, Policy Priorities and High Level Outcomes – 2004/05 DISTRICT THEMES CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICY PRIORITIES 2004/05 POLICY PRIORITY TACKLING ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOUR SUPPORTING THE VULNERABLE SAFER COMMUNITIES TACKLING ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOUR PROSPEROUS COMMUNITIES SUPPORTING THE VULNERABLE SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES PROTECTING THE GREEN BELT GREEN & CLEAN OPEN SPACES HEALTHY COMMUNITIES A MIX OF LEISURE FOR ALL AGES High level outcomes for 2004/05 Reduce the fear of crime in Three Rivers District from the levels found by the April 2001 telephone survey Delivery of the Community Safety Partnership outcomes That those budgets dedicated to supporting those in need are fully spent Significant progress in implementing Department of Works and Pensions performance standards to provide a better service to benefits customers Action taken to ensure that 2010 Decent Homes Standard targets will be met Ensure that no development which would be contrary to green belt policies takes places in the Green Belt Ensure that at least 65% of development takes place on previously developed land Evidence that the streets and town centres of the district are clean places to be PROTECTING THE GREEN BELT GREEN AND CLEAN OPEN SPACES A MIX OF LEISURE FOR Evidence of increased access to leisure provision by the young and the elderly ALL AGES Evidence of increased access to leisure venues by people with a disability Implementation of the Improvement Plan which arises from our CPA inspection Jan 2004 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Updated District Community Plan which has been agreed with partners Progress against achieving the High level outcomes will be reported to each meeting of the Executive Committee 5 Comprehensive Performance Assessment - Three Rivers underwent a Comprehensive Performance Assessment during January 2004. The Council was pleased to be assessed as assessed as “good” by the Audit Commission but is striving to be “excellent”. We recognise that one of the things we can do to help bring this about will be to demonstrate that we can improve service provision for the public, particularly in those areas that we have identified as priorities. How we plan to target those priorities is set out below. Setting Targets and Monitoring Progress. - In order to effectively measure progress against each of the priorities the relevant Best Value and Local Pi’s that can be associated to each Priority have been identified, against which targets have been set Improving Performance - One of the ways the Council measures how it is performing in delivery of its services is by comparing its performance for Best Value Performance Indicators relative to other authorities across England. As well as monitoring how it is performing in absolute terms, performance is scored according to the authority co to the best quartile (75 percentile) or worst quartile (25-percentile) performance. In this context, best quartile means the level of performance achieved by the best performing 25% of authorities. Improvement Targets - The Council’s improvement strategy focusing on BVPIs can be expressed as follows; BVPI Type Status as at March 2003 Worst Quartile For those BVPIs which relate to priorities For those BVPIs which relate to Corporate Governance / Other 27% 31% 25% 32% 30% 12% 36% 3rd Quartile 2nd Quartile Targets Move above Worst Quartile by 2004/05 and, Into 2nd Quartile by 2005/06 Achieve 2nd Quartile by 2004/05 and Achieve Best Quartile by 2005/06 Improve on previous year for 2004/05, and Achieve Best Quartile by 2005/06 Best Quartile Maintain Best Quartile year on year Worst Quartile Move above Worst Quartile by 2004/05, and Into 2nd Quartile by 2005/06 3rd Quartile Achieve 2nd Quartile by 2005/06 2nd Quartile Maintain 2nd Quartile year on year Best Quartile Maintain Best Quartile year on year 7% 6 BVPIs to monitor progress against Policy Priorities Policy Priority - Tackling Anti-Social Behaviour BVPI Description BVPI 126 Domestic burglaries per 1,000 households Violent offences committed by a stranger per 1,000 population Violent offences committed in a public place per 1,000 BVPI 127b population Violent offences committed in connection with licensed BVPI 127c premises per 1,000 population Violent offences committed under the influence per BVPI 127d 1,000 population BVPI 127a BVPI 128 Vehicle crimes per 1,000 population BVPI 174 The number of racial incidents recorded by the authority per 100,000 population BVPI 175 The % of racial incidents that resulted in further action Quartile 02/03 (ODPM) Target 03/04 Actual 03/04 Target 04/05 Target 05/06 Target 06/07 Dept Plan 3rd 11.28 13.70 13.0 12.4 11.7 DSS 3rd 1.42 1.85 1.76 1.67 1.59 DSS Worst 3.68 5.25 4.99 4.74 4.50 DSS Best 0.19 0.44 0.42 0.40 0.38 DSS Worst 1.58 2.93 2.78 2.64 2.51 DSS 3rd 11.22 15.87 15.4 14.9 14.5 DSS Worst 24.13 78.78 98.48 123.10 153.88 DSS Best 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% DSS 7 Policy Priority - Supporting the vulnerable BVPI BVPI 76 Description Housing Benefit Security 1) Number of claimants visited (per 1000 caseload) 2) Number of fraud investigators employed (per 1000 caseload) 3) Number of fraud investigations (per 1000 caseload) 4) Number of prosecutions and sanctions (per 1000 caseload) BVPI 78a Average time for processing new benefit claims BVPI 78b Average time for processing notifications of changes of circumstance BVPI 78c Percentage of benefit renewal claims processed on time BVPI 79a BVPI 79b BVPI 80 Percentage of cases where benefit entitlement calculation was correct The % of recoverable overpayments (excluding council tax benefit) that were recovered in the year Satisfaction with the benefit service a) Contact with the office. b) Service in the office. c) Telephone service. d) Staff in the office. e) Forms. f) Speed of service. g) Overall satisfaction Quartile 02/03 (ODPM) Target 03/04 Amended Definition Actual 03/04 1) 2) 3) 4) 294 0.87 41.92 7.86 Target 04/05 1) 2) 3) 4) 384 1.31 46.28 10.48 Target 05/06 1) 2) 3) 4) 384 1.31 47.16 10.48 Target 06/07 1) 2) 3) 4) 384 1.31 47.16 10.48 Dept Plan DCR Best 28 25 28 28 28 DCR 2nd 9 8 7 7 7 DCR 3rd 75% 66% 3rd 98.5% 97% 99% 99% 99% DCR Worst 45% 40.1% 42% 50% 50% DCR a) b) c) d) e) f) g) 8 86% 92% 83% 88% 71% 85% 87% Deleted 2004/05 3 Year Survey DCR DCR BVPI BVPI 156 BVPI 164 BVPI 176 BVPI 177 BVPI 183 BVPI 202 (New) BVPI 203 (New) Description The % of authority buildings open to the public in which all public areas are suitable for and accessible to disabled people. Does the authority follow the Commission for Racial Equality's code of practice in rented housing [and follow the Good Practice Standards for social landlords on tackling harassment included in the Code of Practice for Social Landlords: Tackling Racial Harassment]? The number of domestic violence refuge places per 10,000 population which are provided or supported by the authority Percentage of authority expenditure on legal and advice services which is spent on services that have been awarded the Quality Mark and meet a priority need as defined in the Community Legal Service Partnership strategic plan The average length of stay in (i) bed and breakfast accommodation and (ii) hostel accommodation of households which include dependent children or a pregnant woman and which are unintentionally homeless and in priority need. The number of people sleeping rough on a single night within the area of the local authority. The percentage change in the average number of families, which include dependant children or a pregnant woman, placed in temporary accommodation under the homeless legislation compared with the average from the previous year. Quartile 02/03 (ODPM) Target 03/04 Actual 03/04 Target 04/05 Target 05/06 Target 06/07 Dept Plan Worst 33% 8% 85% 100% 100% DL&E Best Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes DHH 3rd 0.0532 0.0552 0.055 0.055 0.055 DHH 3% 2.93% 3% 3% 3% DCR 6 weeks 3 weeks 3 weeks 3 weeks 3 weeks (i) 3rd DHH (ii) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A New BVPI 2004/05 DHH New BVPI 2004/05 DHH BVPI 176 – In calculating the outturn the contribution made by Three Rivers is based on our 2003/04 budgetary estimate and the overall operational expenditure for the refuge is based on draft final accounts provided by Novas-Ouvertures Group who oversee the overall provision and management of the premises. 2 9 Policy Priority - Protecting the Green Belt BVPI Description Percentage of new homes built on previously developed land Do you have a development plan (or alterations to it) BVPI 200a that has been adopted in the last 5 years and the end date of which has not expired? BVPI 204 Percentage of appeals allowed against the authority's (New) decision to refuse planning applications. BVPI 106 Quartile 02/03 (ODPM) Target 03/04 Actual 03/04 Target 04/05 Target 05/06 Target 06/07 Dept Plan Best 65% 94% 65% 65% 65% DL&E Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes DL&E New BVPI 2004/05 10 DL&E Policy Priority - Green and clean open spaces BVPI Description BVPI 82a The percentage of household waste recycled BVPI 82b The percentage of household waste composted. (Amended definition) BVPI 84 The kg of household waste collected per head per annum BVPI 86 Cost of waste collection per household BVPI 89 BVPI 90a BVPI 90b BVPI 91 BVPI 180a BVPI 199 The percentage of people satisfied with the cleanliness standard in their area The percentage of people satisfied with the household waste collection The percentage of people satisfied with the waste recycling Percentage of population resident in the authority’s area served by a kerbside collection of recyclables. The energy consumption/m2 of local authority operational property, compared with comparable buildings in the UK as a whole, i) electricity ii) fossil fuels The proportion of relevant land and highways as defined under EPA 1990 Part IV section 86 (expressed as a percentage) that is assessed as having combined deposits of litter and detritus (e.g., sand, silt, and other debris) across four categories of cleanliness (Clean, Light, Significant, Heavy) Quartile 02/03 (ODPM) Target 03/04 Actual 03/04 Target 04/05 Target 05/06 Target 06/07 Dept Plan 2nd 22% 18.66% 24% 25% 25% DL&E Worst 0% 0% 2% >8% >8% DL&E Best 316.85kg 337.92kg 345kg 365kg 365kg DL&E Worst £71.65 £57.79 £93.29 £96.34 £99.95 DL&E 75% 61% 3 Year Survey DL&E 88% 77% 3 Year Survey DL&E 75% 66% 3 Year Survey DL&E Best 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (i) 2nd (i) 97% (i) 141% (i) 139% (i) 130% (i) 128% (ii) 3rd (ii) 99% (ii) 87% (ii) 85% (ii) 80% (ii) 79% 6% 6% 6% 6% New BVPI 2003/04 11 DL&E DCR DL&E Policy Priority - Providing a mix of leisure facilities for all ages BVPI Description BVPI 114 The adoption of a Local Cultural Strategy The percentage of residents satisfied with the Local Authority Cultural services overall, and shown as (a) sports and leisure facilities, BVPI 119 (b) libraries (c) museums/galleries (d) theatres and concert halls, (e) parks and open spaces Quartile 02/03 (ODPM) Target 03/04 Actual 03/04 Best 100% 100% Amended Definition 12 a) 46% b) N/A c) N/A d) 43% e) 70% Target 04/05 Target 05/06 Target 06/07 Dept Plan Deleted DL&E 3 Year Survey DL&E BVPIs to monitor progress against Corporate Governance BVPI BVPI 1a BVPI 1b BVPI 1c BVPI 2a Description Does the authority have a Community Strategy developed in collaboration with the local strategic partnership, for improving the economic, social and environmental well being in a way that is sustainable? By when will a full review of the Community Strategy be completed? If such a review was scheduled for this year was it completed on time? Has the authority reported progress towards implementing the community strategy to the wider community this year? If no by when will this be undertaken? The level (if any) of the Equality Standard for Local Government to which the authority conforms BVPI 2b The duty to promote race equality. BVPI 3 The percentage of citizens satisfied with the overall service provided BVPI 4 BVPI 8 The percentage of complainants satisfied with the handling of their complaint The percentage of invoices for commercial goods and services that were paid by the authority within 30 days of such invoices being received by the authority. BVPI 9 Percentage of Council Tax collected. BVPI 10 The percentage of non-domestic rates due for the financial year which were received by the authority. Quartile 02/03 (ODPM) Target 03/04 Actual 03/04 Target 04/05 Target 05/06 Target 06/07 Dept Plan Best Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes DSS March 2004 Not Completed March 2005 Yes Yes November 2003 Yes Yes Yes DSS 1 0 0 1 1 TRDC 63% 72% 100% 100% TRDC Worst Amended Definition Major Review to be carried out 2007/08 DSS 75% 62% 3 Year Survey TRDC 75% 29% 3 Year Survey TRDC 3rd 100% 95.10% 100% 100% 100% DCR 3rd 97.50% 96.8% 97.3% 97.6% 97.8% DCR Worst 98.20% 98.48% 98.7% 98.8% 98.9% DCR 13 BVPI Description BVPI 11a The percentage of top 5% of earners that are women. BVPI 11b The percentage of top 5% of earners from black and minority ethnic communities. The number of working days/shifts lost due to sickness absence. The percentage of employees retiring early (excluding illBVPI 14 health retirements) as a percentage of the total work force. The percentage of employees retiring on grounds of ill BVPI 15 health as a percentage of the total workforce. The percentage of local authority employees declaring BVPI 16a that they meet the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 disability definition compared with, BVPI 12 BVPI 16b The percentage of economically active disabled people in the authority area. BVPI 17a The percentage of local authority employees from minority ethnic communities compared with The percentage of the economically active minority ethnic community population in the authority area. The number of types of interactions that are enabled for electronic delivery as a percentage of the types of BVPI 157 interactions that are legally permissible for electronic delivery. Quartile 02/03 (ODPM) Target 03/04 Actual 03/04 Target 04/05 Target 05/06 Target 06/07 Dept Plan Best 45% 39% 40% 40% 40% DSS Worst 7.70% 0% 5% 5% 5% DSS Best 6.8 7.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 DSS Best 0.45% 0% 0.45% 0.45% 0.45% DSS 3rd 0.35% 0.32% 0.35% 0.35% 0.35% DSS Worst 0.60% 0.3% 1% 1.30% 1.6% DSS 9.85% Best 7.7% BVPI 17b 4.77% N/A 8% 8% 8% 8.04% Best 14 75% 69% DSS N/A 93% 100% 100% DSS BVPIs to monitor services not directly linked to Policy Priorities BVPI Description The proportion of unfit private sector dwellings made fit or demolished as a direct result of action by the local authority. Energy Efficiency – the average SAP rating of local BVPI 63 authority owned dwellings. The number of private sector vacant dwellings that are BVPI 64 returned into occupation or demolished during 2003/04 as a direct result of action by the local authority. Local authority rent collection and arrears: proportion of BVPI 66a rent collected. Satisfaction of tenants of council housing with the overall service provided by their landlord: with results further BVPI 74 broken down by i) black and minority ethnic and ii) nonblack and minority ethnic tenants. Satisfaction of tenants of council housing with opportunities for participation in management and decision making in relation to housing services provided BVPI 75 by their landlord: with results further broken down by (i) black and minority ethnic and (ii) non-black and minority ethnic tenants. BVPI 62 BVPI 107 Planning cost per head of population BVPI 109a Percentage of major applications determined in 13 weeks BVPI 109b Percentage of minor applications determined in 8 weeks 3 Quartile 02/03 (ODPM) Target 03/04 Actual 03/04 Target 04/05 Target 05/06 Target 06/07 Dept Plan Best 3% 2.25% 3% 3% 3% DHH Worst 56.7 Not Available3 57.8 58.9 59.9 DHH Worst 0% 0% 0% 2% 5% DHH 2nd 98.40% 98.52% 98.66% 98.78% 98.88% DHH 3rd 86% 73.7% (i) 69.9% 3 Year Survey DHH 3 Year Survey DHH Deleted 2004/05 DL&E (ii) 73.8% 70% 63.7% (i) 60.3% (ii) 64.1% Worst £19.95 £19.26 3rd 60% 61.5% 60% 60% 60% DL&E 3rd 65% 76% 65% 65% 65% DL&E Software purchased but not fully operational 15 BVPI 109c Percentage of other applications determined in 8 weeks. BVPI Description 3rd 80% 87% 80% 80% 80% DL&E Quartile 02/03 (ODPM) Target 03/04 Actual 03/04 Target 04/05 Target 05/06 Target 06/07 Dept Plan 84% 71% 3 Year Survey DL&E Definition to be amended DHH BVPI 111 The percentage of applicants satisfied with the planning service received BVPI 166 Score against a checklist of enforcement best practice for environmental health Best 100% 100% BVPI 179 Percentage of Standard Searches carried out within 10 working days 3rd 100% 99.77% 100% 100% 100% DL&E BVPI 184a The proportion of local authority homes which were nondecent at 1 April 2003 3rd - 33.9% 16.7% 10.5% 4.0% DHH Best 34% 51.7% 38.5% 62.5% 21.9% DHH Best 90% 93.6% 95% 98% 99% DHH 2nd 90% 92.9% The percentage change in proportion of non-decent LA homes between 1 April 2003 and 1 April 2004 Percentage of responsive (but not emergency) repairs BVPI 185 during the year, for which the authority both made and kept an appointment. The number of decisions delegated to officers as a BVPI 188 percentage of all decisions BVPI 184b BV 205 (New) Planning - Quality of service checklist New BVPI 2004/05 16 Deleted 2004/05 DL&E DL&E User Satisfaction Surveys During 2003/04 we have carried out a number of user satisfaction surveys which provide a range of survey-based best value performance indicators. These are shown as follows; General Survey – BVPI’s 3, 4, 89, 90, 119 Benefits Survey – BVPI 80 Planning Survey – BVPI 111 Tenants Survey – BVPI’s 74, 75 The results related to these indicators are shown in the previous tables. In addition to reporting the outturn figures we are also required by the ODPM to report the base number and confidence interval for each indicator. The figures have been provided by ATP and are shown in the following table. Survey BVPI Description Base Number Confidence Interval (+/-) BVPI 3 1493 2.5% 336 4.9% 1501 2.5% BVPI 90a The percentage of citizens satisfied with the overall service provided. The percentage of complainants satisfied with the handling of their complaint. The percentage of people satisfied with the cleanliness standard in their area. The percentage of people satisfied with the household waste collection. 1482 2.1% BVPI 90b The percentage of people satisfied with the waste recycling. 1374 2.5% BVPI 119a The percentage of residents satisfied with sports and leisure facilities. 1356 2.7% BVPI 119d The percentage of residents satisfied with theatres and concert halls. 1347 2.6% BVPI 119e The percentage of residents satisfied with parks and open spaces. 1405 2.4% BVPI 4 BVPI 89 General 17 Survey Benefits Planning BVPI Confidence Interval (+/-) Satisfaction with contact with the office. 689 2.6% BVPI 80b Satisfaction with service in the office 434 2.6% BVPI 80c Satisfaction with telephone service. 288 4.5% BVPI 80d Satisfaction with staff in the office. 690 2.4% BVPI 80e Satisfaction with forms. 719 3.3% BVPI 80f Satisfaction with speed of the service. 739 2.6% BVPI 80g Overall satisfaction with the benefits service. 737 2.4% BVPI 111 The percentage of applicants satisfied with the planning service received. 234 5.8% BVPI 74 Satisfaction of tenants of council housing with the overall service provided by their landlord. 836 3.0% Satisfaction of black and minority ethnic tenants with the overall service. 14 24.0%4 819 3.0% 642 3.7% 10 30.3%4 BVPI 74(ii) BVPI 75 BVPI 75(i) 4 Base Number BVPI 80a BVPI 74(i) Tenants Description Satisfaction of non-black and minority ethnic tenants with the overall service. Satisfaction of tenants of council housing with opportunities for participation in management and decision making in relation to housing services provided by their landlord. Satisfaction of black and minority ethnic tenants of council housing with opportunities for participation in management and decision making. High value due to low numbers of BME participants in the survey 18 BVPI 75(ii) Satisfaction of non-black and minority ethnic tenants of council housing with opportunities for participation in management and decision making. 19 628 3.8% Procurement – Statement on contracts When the Council contracts out its services, it aims to obtain Best Value in terms of cost and quality of service. It does not have a predetermined view on whether services should be provided in-house or by outside contractors. However, in the event of a change of provider or contractor, the Council is concerned to ensure that the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations (T.U.P.E.) are followed where applicable. This applies whether the transfer of work occurs between Council employees and an outside contractor or between two external providers. Since 1 April 2003 three contracts have commenced where TUPE applied (see *). All of these contracts involved a change of contractor. Contract Date Contract Description Contractor 1 April 2003 Corporate Contract for Cleaning * Hughes Gardner Cleaning and Support Services Ltd 1 April 2003 Manned Guarding at Three Rivers House * Elizabethan Security Ltd 1 November 2003 Grounds Maintenance General * Three Rivers Environmental Protection 1 November 2003 Grounds Maintenance Croxley Green Croxley Green Parish Council 1 January 2004 Housing Maintenance Three Rivers Construction 1 January 2004 Housing Maintenance Fleet Construction Ltd 1 January 2004 Housing Maintenance Mill Green Electrical Ltd. 1 January 2004 Housing Maintenance G. Smith Ltd 1 January 2004 Housing Maintenance B. C. F. Roofing Contractors 1 January 2004 Housing Maintenance Horwood 1 January 2004 Housing Maintenance Stanley All of the tender exercises proceeding the awarding of the above mentioned contracts made it clear, in all of the documentation, that TUPE might apply. The Council used its best endeavors to ensure (within the limitations of the Data Protection Act) that the correct information was passed to the tenderers and that all tenderers had taken into account the possibility that TUPE may apply, when preparing their tenders. 20
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz