Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions

Translates of compact sets
and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
Ondřej Zindulka
Czech Technical University Prague
September 14, 2012
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
A property of Cantor set
Theorem (Gruenhage 2002)
Let C ⊆ R be the Cantor set and T ⊆ R. If |T | < c, then C + T 6= R.
Question (Gruenhage 2002)
Is there K ⊆ R null compact such that C + T = R for some T ∈ [R]<c ?
Question (Mauldin)
Is there K ⊆ R compact with dimH K < 1 such that C + T = R for some
T ∈ [R]<c ?
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
Thin sets
Definition
A set X ⊆ R is thin if ∀T ∈ [R]<c X + T 6= R.
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
Consistency results
Theorem
con(ZFC + X is thin ⇔ X is Lebesgue null)
con(ZFC + ∃X compact null that is not thin)
con(ZFC + thin sets form a σ-ideal)
con(ZFC + thin sets do not form an ideal)
Lemma (Steinhaus)
If A, B are not null and B is compact, then A + B contains an interval.
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
Witness
Definition
A compact set C is a witness to X if ∀t ∈ R |(X + t) ∩ C| < c
Proposition
If X has a witness, then X is thin.
Theorem (Elekes and Steprans 2004)
There is E compact null that does not have a witness and
E is thin under CH,
E is not thin in the Sacks model.
Question (Oz)
Is it consitent that every thin compact set has a witness?
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
Sacks model
Question (Oz)
Is it consitent that every thin compact set has a witness?
Definition (M. Hrušák, Oz 2011)
A Borel ideal J is a Borel witness to X if ∀t ∈ R X + t ∈ J and
ZFC ` cov(J ) = c.
Proposition
If X has a Borel witness, then X is thin.
Theorem (M. Hrušák, Oz 2011)
In the Sacks model, a compact set has a Borel witness iff it is thin.
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
Powerful Hausdorff dimension
Definition (Oz 2005)
Let E be a set in a metric space. Define
dimπH E = sup
n∈ω
dimH E n
dimH E n
= lim
.
n∈ω
n
n
Theorem (Oz 2011)
Let X, Y be metric spaces, ϕ : X × R<ω → Y a σ-Lipschitz map.
Let T ⊆ R<ω , |T | < c. If A ⊆∗ ϕ(X × T ) is analytic, then
dimπH A 6 dimπH X.
Corollary (Oz 2011)
There is B ⊆ Y such that
If A ⊆∗ B is analytic, then dimπH A 6 dimπH X,
ϕ(X × {t}) ⊆∗ B for all t ∈ R<ω .
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
Powerful Hausdorff dimension vs. lower packing dimension
Theorem (Oz 2011)
Let X, Y be metric spaces, ϕ : X × R<ω → Y a σ-Lipschitz map.
Let T ⊆ R<ω , |T | < c. If A ⊆∗ ϕ(X × T ) is analytic, then
dimP A 6 dimP X.
Question (Oz)
Is there X ⊆ R compact such that dimπH X < dimP X?
Is there X ⊆ R compact such that dimP X < dimπH X?
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
Precipitous nets
Definition
Let X be a set in a metric space.
A finite family of subsets of X is termed a partial cover of X.
diam E = sup{diam E : E ∈ E}.
A sequence E = {En : n ∈ ω} is termed a net.
b = {S En : n ∈ ω}.
E
Definition
A net E is precipitous if
log n|En |
−→ 0.
log diam En
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
Combinatorics of covers and dimensions
Definition
A cover {Un : n ∈ ω} of a set X is
a λ-cover if ∀x ∈ X ∃∞ n x ∈ Un ,
a γ-cover if ∀x ∈ X ∀∞ n x ∈ Un ,
an ω-cover if ∀F ∈ [X]<ω ∃∞ n x ∈ Un ,
a γ-groupable
S cover if there is a partition I0 , I1 , . . . of ω into finite sets
such that { n∈Ik Un : k ∈ ω} is a γ-cover.
Theorem (Oz 2011)
b is a λ-cover.
dimH X = 0 ⇔ ∃ precipitous net E such that E
b is a γ-cover.
dimP X = 0 ⇔ ∃ precipitous net E such that E
−−→
b is a γ-groupable cover.
dimH X = 0 ⇔ ∃ precipitous net E such that E
b is a ω-cover.
dimπH X = 0 ⇔ ∃ precipitous net E such that E
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
A metric on 2ω
Definition
For p ∈ 2<ω , x, y ∈ 2ω
κ(p) = min{n : ∀i ∈ [n, |p|) p(i) = 0}
1
χ(p) =
(|p| + 1)κ(p)!
ρ(x, y) = χ(x ∧ y)
X = (2ω , ρ)
Definition
En = {[p] : p ∈ 2n+1 , κ(p) = n + 1}
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
Dimensions in X
Lemma
∀x ∈ 2ω {n : x ∈ En } = x
Proposition
dimH X = 0
If F ⊆ X is centered, then dimπH F = 0
If F ⊆ X is nonmeager, then dimP F > 1
Theorem
If F ⊆ X is an ultrafilter, then dimπH F = 0 < 1 6 dimP F .
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
Rich trees
Definition
A tree T ⊆ 2<ω is rich if ∀p ∈ T ∃q ⊇ p Sq ⊆ T.
Theorem (M. Hrušák, Oz 2011)
There is a rich tree which set of branches is centered.
Corollary (M. Hrušák, Oz 2011)
There is a perfect set F ⊆ X such that dimπH F = 0 < 1 6 dimP F .
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
The interval
Lemma
There is a Lipschitz map ϕ : X → [0, 1] such that ϕ−1 is
1
-Hölder.
3
Corollary
There is a compact set E ⊆ R such that dimπH E = 0 <
1
3
6 dimP E.
Lemma (Oz 2011)
dimP X × Y > dimP X + dimP Y
Lemma (Falconer and Howroyd 1995)
Let n > m > 1. Let X ⊆ Rn be a Borel set. There is a projection π on Rm
such that
dimP X
dimP π(X) >
.
1
1+ m
− n1 dimP X
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions
Conclusion
Theorem (M. Hrušák, Oz 2011)
There is a compact set E ⊆ R such that dimπH E = 0 < 1 = dimP E.
Theorem (M. Hrušák, Oz 2011)
There is a compact set E ⊆ R such that dimP E = 0 < 1 = dimπH E.
Ondřej Zindulka
Translates of compact sets and combinatorics of fractal dimensions