Chapter 8 Pretrial and Trial Procedures Learning Objectives Summarize the bail process Discuss the main issues associated with bail Differentiate the 2 main mechanisms for charging defendants (grand jury indictment or prosecutor’s information) Summarize the pleas available to a criminal defendant Explain the issues involved in plea bargaining Learning objectives Describe the plea bargaining process Explain the purpose of pretrial diversion Describe the goals and purpose of the trial process Explain the legal rights of the accused at trial Summarize the trial process Pretrial Procedures Important components of the justice process Vast majority of cases are resolved informally at this stage and never come before the courts Bail Defined: Security provided to the court that the defendant will appear at every stage in the CJ process Failure to appear results in forfeiture of bail is forfeited and confinement in jail until court appearance Right to Bail: Eighth Amendment does not guarantee bail, but prohibits excessive bail Stack v Boyle - bail is excessive when it exceeds an amount reasonably calculated to ensure the defendant’s appearance at trial Bail Bail Release Mechanisms: Issues to be considered for bail eligibility: Crime type Flight risk Dangerousness of defendant Bail Release Mechanisms: Police field citation release Police station house citation release Police/pretrial jail citation release Direct release programs Police/court bail schedule Bail 2/3 of all felony defendants were released on bail 1/ 2 of all violent criminals were released on bail 8% of suspected murderers released on bail 42% robbery suspects released on bail 44% motor vehicle theft release rate 49% burglary release rate 55% rape suspect release rate Six Types of Bail Full Cash Deposit Cash Surety Bail Conditional Bail Unsecured Bail Release on Recognizance (ROR) Bail Bail Issues: Determining whether or not the defendant will appear for trial Discriminatory against the poor Costly for government Unfair – higher proportion of detainees receive longer sentences than people on bail Dehumanizing The decision to bail may be racially or ethnically biased Bail Bail Issues: Bondsmen and County Hunters Employed by bonding agencies to find and return bail jumpers Have legal powers to arrest and detain which vary from state to state Bail Bail Reform: Factors such as conviction and sentence disparities have given rise to bail reform movement Manhattan Bail Project (1961) Federal Bail Reform Act of 1966 Bail Reform Act of 1984 Bail Preventive Detention: Certain defendants can be confined before trial without the possibility of bail Preventive detention is ordered if judges determine that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person and the safety of any other person or community Bail Pretrial Services: Provide information for judges to make release decisions Assess likelihood of defendant failing to appear or being rearrested Monitor conditions of release or provide intensive supervision Provide special services for mentally ill Provide intense direct supervision Charging the Defendant The Indictment Process and the Grand Jury: Power to act as independent investigating body Contains information on findings and recommendation of indictment Determines if probable cause exists: Probable cause results in indictment or true bill: No probable cause, no bill Charging the Defendant The Information Process and the Preliminary Hearing: Open hearing conducted before a judge Judge decides whether there is sufficient probable cause to believe the defendant committed the alleged crime Charging the Defendant Arraignment: Occurs after the indictment but before trial Judge informs defendant of charges and availability of counsel Plea is entered The Plea: Guilty Not guilty Nolo contendere Plea Bargaining Exchange of prosecutorial and judicial concessions for guilty plea Initial charges may be reduced Prosecutor may promise to recommend lenient sentence Prosecutor may alter charge 90% of criminal convictions are a result of negotiated guilty pleas Plea Bargaining Proponents argue the benefits: Costs of prosecution reduced Administrative efficiency of courts improved Prosecution can devote more time to more serious cases Opponents believe: Dangerous offenders may receive lenient sentences Prosecutors given free hand to induce or compel defendants to plea bargain Possible that an innocent person will admit guilt if they believe system is biased and have little chance of acquittal Plea Bargaining Legal Issues in Plea Bargaining: Defendants entitled to effective counsel Pleas must be voluntary and without pressure Any promise made by the prosecutor must be kept after defendant admits guilt Defendants must also keep their side of the bargain to receive the promised offer of leniency Plea Bargaining The Role of Defense Counsel: Advisory role Ensure defendant understands the process and the guilty plea Ensure defendant understands alternatives Communicate all offers to client The Role of the Judge: Judges must approve plea agreements Plea Bargaining Plea Bargaining Reform: Safeguards developed to ensure innocent individuals do not plead guilty under coercion Judicial supervision ensures plea bargaining conducted in a fair manner Banning plea bargaining Pretrial Diversion Diversion programs suspend criminal proceedings so that accused can participate in community treatment programs Diversion gives the client an opportunity to: Avoid stigma of criminal record Continue to work and support family Continue education goals Access rehabilitation services such as anger management Make restitution to the victim or payback community Reduce costs and alleviate prison crowding The Trial Bench Trail Jury Trial • Judge renders verdict • (if defendant waives jury trial) • Jury renders verdict The Trial Legal Rights During Trial: Impartial judge Competent at trial Confront witnesses Compulsory process Impartial jury Counsel at trial Speedy trial Public trial Convicted by proof beyond a reasonable doubt The Trial The Trial Jury Selection: The prosecutor and defense attorney can remove prospective jurors (under oath) by challenges known as: Voir dire Challenge for cause Peremptory challenges The Trial Process Opening Statements: Prosecutor makes first opening statement, then defense attorney Statement provides an overview of the case No prejudicial remarks, inflammatory statements, or irrelevant facts Prosecutor’s Case: Present evidence Call witnesses Cross examination Witnesses restricted to factual information Only expert witnesses can offer opinions The Trial Process The Criminal Defense: Defendant under no obligation to present evidence as burden of proof is on the prosecution Refutes prosecution’s allegations After the defense rests prosecution is given the opportunity for rebuttal, followed by the defense’s surrender rebuttal Closing Arguments: Selectively review facts and evidence Provides inferences from evidence Cannot refer to matters not in evidence The Trial Process Instructions to the Jury: Judge will instruct, or charge the jury members on the principles of law that ought to guide and control their decision on the defendant’s innocence or guilt Deliberation and Verdict: Guilty, innocent, hung jury, jury nullification The Trial The Sentence: Usually by the trial judge but in some jurisdictions jury may impose or make recommendation Judge considers information in pre-sentence investigation report (PSI) Different sanctions include: Fines Probation Imprisonment The Trial The Appeal: Once a defendant has been found guilty, they may petition an appellate court to review the procedures used during the trial Defendants may have two main avenues to challenge such procedures: ① Appeals ② Habeas corpus
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz