industriAll 27/2013 For socially responsible and democratic economic governance: a trade union checklist1 (Document adopted by the 3rd Meeting of the industriAll Europe Executive Committee Luxembourg, 26-27 November 2013) For industriAll Europe, the continuing commitment to the process of European integration depends on whether or not the European Union is reduced to a mere single market project and free trade zone. IndustriAll Europe will fight for a Europe that becomes once more a Europe of democratic, economic and social progress. The EU is about the Member States growing together rather than putting them in competition with one another. The dramatic consequences – for entire nations – of the approaches being followed by the Troika and most governments in Europe are incompatible with people’s needs and are leading to a deterioration in living and working conditions for workers in our industries. Trade unions demand socially responsible and democratic economic governance in the EU, one that aims at improving living and working conditions for everyone, especially for lowpaid workers, whether in Luxembourg or Bulgaria, Germany or Greece. Therefore, the principle purpose of EU economic governance must be to create sustainable upward pressure on incomes, working conditions and employment without interfering in national systems of social security, wage-setting and collective bargaining, but on the contrary supporting them. By contrast, the sole focus of the current economic governance approach is on enhancing international competitiveness and adjusting economic imbalances by lowering social, labour, and living standards; particularly in those countries labelled as “underperforming”. Trade unions and collective bargaining are under heavy attack as if they were responsible for the crisis and the malfunctioning of the Economic and Monetary Union. Such a policy is intolerable and unsustainable. It is an attack on trade unions and workers’ rights that fosters a downward spiral of social dumping and impoverishes workers and their families. It even disenfranchises parliaments by shifting power to the European Commission, national governments and the European Central Bank without effective checks and 1 Based on the UNI Europa resolution adopted at its Executive Committee Meeting in Brussels 29 & 30 May 2013 International Trade Union House (ITUH) - Boulevard du Roi Albert II 5 (bte 10) - B-1210 Brussels Tel: +32 (0)2/226 00 50 [email protected] www.industriall-europe.eu 1 balances. Moreover, it is clearly in breach of the provisions set out in the Treaty on European Union (Title I – Common Provisions) as this Treaty states unambiguously that improving working and living conditions by fostering full employment and social progress is the principle purpose of the EU and thus of EU economic governance. IndustriAll Europe calls upon the EU institutions and the Member States to revise the current economic governance framework as a matter of urgency. A change in key priorities is needed in order to rebalance the EU’s economic and social dimension. Competition on cost must be replaced by a stronger emphasis on quality, research and development, training an d education and the higher productivity of a highly-skilled labour force. Adherence to this principle needs to be seen as a prerequisite for sustainable growth and warrants the creation of secure employment as well as investments in a skilled workforce. In particular, industriAll Europe emphasises its opposition to the currently floated proposals of binding contractual arrangements between the European Commission and Member States. Such agreements are both undemocratic in nature and a means to entrench an ineffective austerity policy. The EU institutions and governments must halt the roll down the slippery slope to socially irresponsible and undemocratic economic governance! Decision-makers must come up with innovative solutions that overcome the helplessness of a failed neo-liberal paradigm. A measure for socially responsible and democratic economic governance We strongly oppose an approach to EU economic governance that complements ineffective neo-liberal policies with insincere “placebo” measures concerning social and labour issues. The purpose of economic governance must be to ensure sustainable growth and full employment with decent jobs, working conditions, wages and living standards for all. Austerity measures are inconsistent with this commitment to social progress; therefore they must end. For industriAll Europe and its affiliates, representing 7 million workers, the following 12 points provide a measure for a framework of socially responsible and democratic economic governance, one that achieves the EU’s fundamental objective of social and economic progress. Economic Policy at the service of Society 1. Tackling imbalances in a socially sustainable manner Economic governance must tackle, reduce - and in future pre-empt - economic imbalances among Member States and with the wider world. Both countries with trade deficits and those with surpluses must contribute in a fair manner, and not least the latter by boosting private and public consumption as well as imports. Instead of one-sided and exaggerated austerity measures we need an impulse for growth and employment in Europe. We need an industrial policy which promotes a social and sustainable economy geared to the environment, creates a competitive industry in countries in crisis, strengthens domestic demand in European countries and accelerates public investments International Trade Union House (ITUH) - Boulevard du Roi Albert II 5 (bte 10) - B-1210 Brussels Tel: +32 (0)2/226 00 50 [email protected] www.industriall-europe.eu 2 2. Fostering internal demand Strong internal demand must be fostered throughout Europe. It is the precondition for a sustainable economy, meeting the future needs of workers and maintaining the European social model. Encouraging investment We need a new investment climate in Europe. Private investors need to regain confidence in the European economy and European industry to invest again. Public investments as a key area need to be rebooted. A comprehensive, forward-looking EU recovery and investment programme for growth, employment and decent jobs is needed, amounting to up to 2% of EU GDP. It should focus in particular on those groups most affected by the crisis, unemployment and bad working conditions - young people, women, handicapped persons and immigrants - and also on a mix of institutional measures, direct public investment (in transport, education, research and development, etc.) and measures to strengthen the industrial base and consumer incentives. The “ETUC plan for investment, sustainable growth and quality jobs”2 provides a valuable model for such a project. 3. Putting public finances on a fair and sustainable footing The fiscal and budgetary situation of countries must be sustainable. An important element in this is ensuring sufficient public income, especially by broadening the tax base to cover all kinds of income and assets in an equitable way. 4. Ending tax competition A legal framework is needed with a view to putting an end to excessive tax competition, as well as combating tax fraud and evasion, including taxation of capital, financial transactions and the abolition of fiscal paradises, in particular through aggressive crossborder tax planning practices. The corporate tax base and minimum rates of taxation for companies should be harmonised. Social Responsibility 5. Protecting social rights The fundamental social rights of workers and trade unions must not be legally subordinated to internal market freedoms, competition law and austerity measures – neither by law nor by conditionality of EU financial aid. The diversity of national industrial relations systems must be respected. 6. Putting an end to attacks on workers and trade unions EU law must provide for legally enforceable guarantees ruling out any EU polices and EU action vis-à-vis Member States – including country specific recommendations (CSR) – that: 2 Adopted at the meeting of the ETUC Executive Committee on 7 November 2013 International Trade Union House (ITUH) - Boulevard du Roi Albert II 5 (bte 10) - B-1210 Brussels Tel: +32 (0)2/226 00 50 [email protected] www.industriall-europe.eu 3 create downward competition on wages, working conditions, social spending, social security standards, taxes and the environment; undermine workers’ and trade union rights; interfere with the autonomy of social partners and collective bargaining. This also extends to extra-legal arrangements like the “Troika” of the EU, ECB and IMF, political interventions by EU institutions or the proposed “contractual arrangements”. 7. Establishing an enforceable legal framework for social partner rights The EU, and the Commission in particular, must have the legal obligation to actively promote and protect decent jobs and working conditions, workers’ and trade union rights as well as collective bargaining and social dialogue at all levels. Equal treatment must apply to all workers. 8. Fighting social dumping Cross-border social dumping must be stopped through a legally enforceable EU framework, in particular regarding companies using internal market freedoms to exploit workers and undercut law-abiding employers. 9. Setting social benchmarks The economic governance process must include the setting and respect of structural social indicators as well as benchmarks for active labour market policies. Socially responsible decision-making requires that the current policy evaluation practice based on an economic scoreboard be complemented with a social scoreboard of equal weight. Democratic Accountability 10. Integrating social dialogue into economic governance IndustriAll Europe rejects any interference in the autonomy of the social partners in the field of collective bargaining and wage-setting as well as any interference in collective bargaining systems. Trade unions must be involved in economic governance at all levels on a compulsory and comprehensive basis. This concerns in particular decision-making processes regarding the design of the EU economic governance framework and the content of country specific recommendations (CSRs). It must include an explicit obligation that: national governments and social partners report on social developments, social dialogue and industrial relations as well as breaches of labour standards; CSRs are negotiated with the social partners at national level, where they so wish. Until now these country specific recommendations were also used as an instrument to intervene in collective bargaining systems and to cut social standards. IndustriAll Europe will participate in a social dialogue within the framework of economic governance only on condition that the CSRs are not used as an instrument to cut wages, working conditions and social standards. To act only within the institutional framework of economic governance limits trade union action. Trade unions must, in addition, act politically to defend workers’ rights. International Trade Union House (ITUH) - Boulevard du Roi Albert II 5 (bte 10) - B-1210 Brussels Tel: +32 (0)2/226 00 50 [email protected] www.industriall-europe.eu 4 11. Reasserting the rights of Parliaments EU economic governance deeply affects the policies of EU Member States and indeed the life of citizens and workers. Decision-making must be democratic. This requires the full involvement of the European Parliament and national parliaments, in particular if EU recommendations and actions towards Member States are underpinned by sanctions. Decision-making that is limited to the Commission and national governments lacks sufficient democratic legitimacy. This applies in particular to the currently discussed idea of “contractual agreements” between the Commission and a Member State. Changing the framework of economic governance must be complemented by a proactive EU policy to address and overcome the current crisis as well as by amending the EU Treaty to give its social dimension equal footing with the economic one. The ETUC’s “Social Compact for Europe” provides a broad foundation for bringing about a truly social Europe. International Trade Union House (ITUH) - Boulevard du Roi Albert II 5 (bte 10) - B-1210 Brussels Tel: +32 (0)2/226 00 50 [email protected] www.industriall-europe.eu 5 EU Economic Governance and Collective Bargaining & Social Policy How to organise Trade Union involvement at National and European level The new EU Economic Governance framework, and particularly the establishment of the European Semester, has a severe impact on the autonomy of social partners in the negotiation process as well as on the basic integrity and structure of collective bargaining systems at national and sectoral level. Calls to decentralise and/or flexibilise the bargaining process or even implement purely downward measures are regular outcomes of the Semester process. The industriAll Europe document “For socially responsible and democratic economic governance: a trade union checklist” argues that social partners must be strongly involved at all stages and levels of the Semester process in order to ensure socially-balanced outcomes of EU economic governance. However, given the current lack of a coherent European framework for social partner involvement, trade unions must voice their demands by using various - often even informal - channels that vary widely between Member States. By its declaration of 31st January 2013, the industriAll Europe Collective Bargaining and Social Policy Committee already stated very clearly that it would not accept any interference by the EU on national collective bargaining systems and outcomes. It has also widely discussed the effects of the Semester policies and the Country Specific Recommendations (CSR) during its recent meetings. The ETUC, for its part, has started a mapping experience of the CSR process and how to involve the national confederations, the trade unions and the European Trade Union Federations (ETUFs) in a joint coordination strategy. They have developed a specific toolkit for that purpose (see appendix). IndustriAll Europe experimented with the toolkit in June of this year when the CSR reports were published. The dual information flow (from ETUC to national confederations and from ETUC to national trade unions via ETUFs) was very positively evaluated. But we also need feedback on what happened at national level with the CSR reports. International Trade Union House (ITUH) - Boulevard du Roi Albert II 5 (bte 10) - B-1210 Brussels Tel: +32 (0)2/226 00 50 [email protected] www.industriall-europe.eu 6 We therefore propose: 1. That the Collective Bargaining & Social Policy Committee should continue with the follow-up of the European Semester Process and the CSR reports and that national affiliated organisations should give us feedback on what happened specifically in their countries. 2. That industriAll Europe should coordinate the results of this process with the other ETUFs and the ETUC and that we should continue the debate on a joint trade union strategy for influencing the Semester process. 3. That we use the attached ETUC toolkits (especially toolkits 1, 2 and 3) as a basis and feasible model for coordinating our trade union strategy. Key: AGS: Annual Growth Survey (presents Commission’s priorities for the Semester AMR: Alert Mechanism Report (identifies countries with macroeconomic imbalances that are analysed and closely supervised) CSR: Country Specific Recommendations (translate EU level priorities into national policies) NRP: National Reform Programme (presents Member States’ planned economic policy measures) International Trade Union House (ITUH) - Boulevard du Roi Albert II 5 (bte 10) - B-1210 Brussels Tel: +32 (0)2/226 00 50 [email protected] www.industriall-europe.eu 7
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz