Spectroscopic auxiliary data : Empirical stellar spectra Why we need real spectra for GAIA ? What spectra are required ? Do we need new observations ? Caroline Soubiran Observatoire de Bordeaux Stellar parametrization from GAIA RVS and MBP-BBP : Teff, logg, [Fe/H], Av, [X/Fe]… Reference system : templates / calibration stars Grids of synthetic spectra = provide templates all over the parameter space with a regular sampling as dense as desired But synthetic spectra do not perfectly reproduce real stars over the whole wavelength range and parameter range because of simplifying assumptions, uncomplete line data….+ some class of stars are not well understood and cannot be easily modelised Spectra of real stars are necessary ¾ to see how different class of stars will appear in the GAIA data space ¾ to assess performances of parametrization algorithms with realistic conditions ¾ to improve grids of synthetic spectra (see POLLUX project) ¾ to study in detail calibration stars « well known » atmospheric parameters and abundances representative of whole parameter space (Teff, logg, [Fe/H], [α/Fe]..) Empirical libraries of reference spectra Compilations - catalogues Observations (homogenity, completness) What spectra are required ? For the photometry : • SEDs from 300 to 1100nm • relative flux calibration better than 1% • 1-3 nm resolution (FWHM C1M system from 7nm to 80nm) • reddening free For RVS : • 845-875 nm • resolution ≥ 11500 For the characterisation of reference stars : • large optical range • resolution ≥ 40000 high S/N for all + wide coverage of the parameter space (ie large number of stars) Are new observations necessary ? Or are there enough on-line resources to build adequate libraires ? - make a complete inventory of available spectrophotometric and HR spectroscopic resources - see with theoricians what observational material they need to validate their models - define the grid points (astrophysical parameters) for which we would like to have spectra - identify reference stars corresponding to these grid points Critical inventory of available SED libraries in progress (see http://www.obs.u-bordeaux1/m2a/soubiran/SEDs_inventory.html + HFA = Hyperleda Fits Archive)) Also the Asiago Database of Spectroscopic Databases (Sordo & Munari, Monte-Rosa conference, 2002) ? •The Indo-U.S. Library of Coudé Feed Stellar Spectra (Valdes et al. 2004) •The ELODIE library (Prugniel & Soubiran 2001, 2004) •STELIB (Le Borgne et al 2003) • A Stellar Spectral Flux Library 131 stars (Pickles 1998). • Stellar spectroscopic atlas (Gunn & Stryker 1983) • ……. None of these libraries has the required properties ! MILES (Sanchez-Blazquez et al 2005, submitted) • wavelength range: 350 - 750 nm • resolution 0.23 nm (FWHM) • 1003 stars with a good coverage of stellar properties • S/N : high • photometric precision (synthetic B-V) : 0.013 mag (internal), 0.011 (external) submitted, spectra not yet available ASTRA (Adelman et al, in project) • wavelength range: 330 - 900 nm • resolution 1.4 nm / 7 nm (FWHM) • stars ?? • S/N ?? • photometric precision : ?? no information about the progress, observations were supposed to start in april 2004 We have 3 possibilities : 1 - Build a completely new library but - it will take several years - do we have the competence to make good spectrophotometry ? - which excellent site and instrument can we use ? 2 - Wait for other projects : MILES and ASTRA 3 - Combine existing libraries (VO tools) Empirical libraries in the RVS range • Marrese et al 2003 • Cenaro et al 2003 • Munari & Tomasella 1999 • Montes et al 1999 • Montes et al 1998 • ….. 1087 stars but ~250 stars with reliable (Teff, logg, [Fe/H]) ~170 stars with measured [α/Fe] A campaign to measure accurate atmospheric parameters and abundances, in an homogenous way, is necessary ¾ focus on primary standards which are very well studied to define an initial grid ex : ~100 stars have been submitted to more than 10 detailed spectroscopic analyses in the last 20 yr, σ(Teff)=80K, σ(logg)=0.21, σ([Fe/H])=0.11 ¾ define a denser grid with secondary standards ex : what range of apparent magnitude will be optimal for GAIA observation of these stars (external calibration) ¾ atmospheric parameters and abundances being model-dependant, spectra of reference stars will have to be re-analysed as models and line data improve (build a database of EW ?) ¾ a lot of high quality spectra of reference stars will be available in the POLLUX database in Montpellier but new observations might be necessary for a sake of completness ¾ identify all stars which lack in spectral libraries : hot stars, cool dwarfs, peculiar abundances emission lines,… Observational facilities ¾ In France, 2 new echelle spectrographs will be available in 2006 : SOPHIE@OHP and NARVAL@Pic_du_Midi well adapted for abundance studies + NARVAL includes the RVS λ-range ¾ GAIA is a priority of the French programmes for stellar physics and galaxies (PNPS and PNG) --> possible to define a key program (ex : COROT obtained 12n /semester over 5 years on ELODIE@OHP) ¾ ESO : necessary to have reference stars in the Southern hemisphere emmi@ntt, ces@3m6, harps@3m6, feros@2m2…… ¾ OPTICON telescopes To be done in the next months : 1 - discuss with theoricians and see what they need to validate their grids of synthetic spectra 2 - draw up an inventory of useful available spectra and see how they can be combined 3 - build a catalogue of primary and secondary reference stars for atmospheric parameters 4 - define observing programs to fill the gaps 5 - find manpower to make the observations, reduce the spectra, measure EW, determine atmospheric parameters and abundances….
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz