EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE LIGHT STRUCTURE EXPERIMENT SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA ENGINEERING CAMPUS LIGHT STRUCTURE EXPERIMENT 1. U1 - Combined Bending and Torsion Experiment 2. U2 - Shear Force and Bending Moment Experiment 3. U3 - Beam Bending Experiment 4. U4 - Unsymmetrical Loaded Cantilever Experiment 5. U5 - Tensile Test 1 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE S1- COMBINED BENDING AND TORSION EXPERIMENT SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA ENGINEERING CAMPUS OBJECTIVES 1. To study the behaviour of structural member subjected to bending and torsion or combination or both load system. 2. To determine the critical level of the combined action of bending and torsional loading on structural member. 2 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE INTRODUCTION AND THEORY A structural member will experience deformation when it is loaded. Different loading system will cause different types of stresses to develop in the member. A structural member is in torsion if subjected to twisting couples or torques and is in bending if subjected to couples acting in the longitudinal plane. In general, the design of engineering structure components is not straight forward because it may involve the combination of few stresses in those components. For example, the bridge pier is subjected to stresses due to bending and torsion. Few theories have been established to assess the strength of the material subjected to the combination of bending and torsional stresses but it is difficult to prove by experiment which theory will gives the most accurate result. Hence, most of the code of practice will give empirical value from few experiments as a guide to design. In order to get the critical bending and torsion ratio for a material is a serial complicated experiment. Although the apparatus used in this`experiment has been equipped with seven bending and torsion ratio which can be applied, accurate result for the critical bending and torsion ratio cannot be achieved due to the following reasons:1. For each bending and torsion ratio, the experiment specimen must consist of the same material. This condition is difficult to achive because the material of the specimen is not 100% uniform although it comes from the same sample. 2. To overcome problem (1) above, the same specimen may be used for each experiment in the series. By this method, the uniformity of the specimen can be maintained. However, due to the reason that each experiment will be conducted until the material achieves elastic failure stage, the material has undergone through strain hardening. This means that for the subsequent experiments, the results obtained will be influenced by strain hardening. APPARATUS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Circular Plate Load Hanger and Set of Weights (Weight of Load Hanger is 500g) Dial Gauge Specimens (4 specimens to be tested at angle 0 0, 15 0, 75 0 and 900) Spirit Level 3 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE PROCEDURE Each group will be given four aluminium specimen. These specimen will be tested by using four different angle which consist of 0o,15o, 75o and 90o. Each group needs only to compare their result from this two experiment and determine bending and torsion ratio which is more critical. 1. Place the first specimen in the apparatus by clamping it to the fixed support. Make sure that the distance of the sholuder of the necking section from surface of the fixed support is about 3mm. This will give the distance between two support surfaces of approximately 25.4mm. Fasten the circular plate and lock the fixed supports. 2. Then, place the dial gauge opposite to the point where the load is to be applied. For example, if the specimen is to be tested at 0o angle, place the dial gauge at the location directly opposite. Tighten the screw to fix the location of the dial gauge. Adjust the dial gauge to the reading of zero. 3. Place the load hanger (weighing 500g) as the first load at 00 angle and record dial gauge reading. Dial gauge reading have to be multiplied with 0.01mm in order to get deflection value in the unit of mm. 4. Add weights with the increment of 200g load until the specimen achieves the state of elastic failure. Record the reading of dial gauge for each addition of load. This can be observed when the change in dial gauge reading starts to become not uniform for each addition of load. 5. Repeat the experiment for the second, third & forth specimen at angle of 15o, 75o and 90o respectively. RESULT 1. Plot load (g) versus deflection (mm) diagram for all four experiment on the same graph. 2. Obtain the slope of each of the diagram. This will give the stiffness of the material for the corresponding bending to torsion ratio. 3. Compare and comment on the values of stiffness obtained. 4 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE S1- COMBINED BENDING AND TORSION EXPERIMENT FORM SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA ENGINEERING CAMPUS Name: _____________________________________________________________________ Matric No.: _______________________ Group: _______________________ Date of Experiment: _________________________ RESULTS: Load (g) Torsion Angle 0° Dial Gauge Reading Deflection (mm) Torsion Angle 15° Dial Gauge Reading Deflection (mm) 5 Torsion Angle 75° Dial Gauge Reading Deflection (mm) Torsion Angle 90° Dial Gauge Reading Deflection (mm) EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Graph: Load versus Deflection diagram for all four experiment Calculation: Stiffness of material for each experiment DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: 6 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE S2 - SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT EXPERIMENT 7 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA ENGINEERING CAMPUS OBJECTIVES Part 1: Shear Force Experiment a) To understand the action of shear force on a beam. b) To show that the shear force at a cut section of a beam is equal to the algebraic sum of the forces acting to the left or right of the section. Part 2: Bending Moment Experiment a) To understand the action of bending moment on a beam. b) To show that the bending moment at a section of a loaded beam is equal to the algebraic sum of the moment to the left or right of the section. INTRODUCTION A length of material supported at two points in a such way that it will carry loads is called a beam. The loading perpendicular to its longitudinal axis causes bending and in most cases transverse sharing. In the simplest example the loads and supporting reactions act in a vertical plane containing the longitudinal axis, and the beam has a rectangular cross section. The loads and support reactions are the external forces acting on the beam and they must be in equilibrium. But in order to study the strength of the beam, it is necessary to know how these external forces affect it. As the theory appendix shows, the mathematical method is to assume the beam is cut into two parts by a transverse section and then to examine the equilibrium of each part. To maintain equilibrium, it is evident that certain forces must be introduced at the cut, and when the cut is not there these same forces exist internally in the material of the beam. 8 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Figure 1 In this experiment, a horizontal beam has been actually cut into two parts (A) and (B) by a vertical cross section (Figure 1), and is then held together with springs (or spring balances) which must produce a system of forces equivalent to those which would exist internally in the beam at that section if it had not been cut. Since the forces in part (A) acting on part (B) must be equal and opposite to those in (B) acting on (A), it follows that the same values will be obtained by working to the right or left of section plane. Given a horizontal beam with vertical loading the internal forces will be:1. 2. for vertical equilibrium a shearing force in the section plane. for equilibrium of moments a moment of resistance due to compression in the top half of the beam section and tension in the bottom half. In the experimental beam the second system of forces is replaced by compression at a hinge in the beam and tension in the under slung spring (or spring balance). The vertical restraint is provided by the half housing at the end of part (A) which fits on the ball bearings pinned to the mating end of part (B). THEORY SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT 9 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE P (A) (B) RA RB Figure 2 Consider abeam resting on supports at A and B and supporting a load P (Figure 2). If the beam is cut by a vertical section XX, then for the beam to remain in equilibrium each part must be in equilibrium. Neglecting the self weight of the beam any extra forces acting on part (A) to preserve equilibrium must be transmitted from part (B) across the section XX, and vice versa. Also the action of a part (A) on part (B) must be equal and opposite to that of (B) and (A). As the load is solely vertical and in the plane of the beam there cannot be horizontal reactions, so equilibrium yields two conditions:1. Vertical equilibrium 2. Equilibrium of moments In the first place these are used for the beam as a whole to evaluate the reactions at A and B. SHEAR FORCE X P 10 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE +ve Qx (A) (B) +ve RA RB X Figure 3 - Shear Force For vertical equilibrium of part (A) there must be a shearing force, Qx acting as shown and equal to –RA. For vertical equilibrium of part (B) the shearing force, Qx evidently acts as shown and has the value of RB – P. To clarify the results a sign convention must be used. The normal one is shown, which leads to the –ve values above. BENDING MOMENT P QX Mx QX l Mx + ve + ve (A) (B) A B a b RA RB Figure 4 – Bending Moment For equilibrium of moments take an axis as shown in the section XX to eliminate Qx. Then using the sign convention given for part (A) of the beam:M x RA .a And for part (B) of the beam M x RA .b P(b ) It can easily been proved that these have the same value by substituting for RB and P as follows:- 11 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Mx b( P RB ) P b.RA RA (a b) RA .a Example :P1 P2 P3 A B 1 2 3 RA a b RB L Shearing force Qx RA P1 or RB P3 P2 Bending Moment M x RA .a P1 (a 1 ) or RB .b P3 ( 3 a) P2 ( 2 a) Numerical Example 5N A 200 X 10N X B 12 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE 500 300 1000 Reactions. Take moment about A 1000RB – (500 x 10)- (200 x 5)=0 RB= 6(N) By vertical equilibrium RA=15-6 = 9 (N) Section XX (to the right) Shear force = 6 – 10 = -4(N) Bending moment = (700 x 6) – (200 x 10)= 2200 (Nmm) APPARATUS Part 1: Shear Force Experiment 1. A pair of simple supports 2. Special beam with cut section 3. A set of weights 4. A load hanger Part 2: Bending Moment Experiment 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Aluminum base support Beam with section connected by a pin A pair of simple support A set of weights A load hanger 13 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Shear Force Apparatus Bending Moment Apparatus PROCEDURE 14 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Part 1a: SHEAR FORCE 1. Place the beam on the supports so that the cut section is located at 600mm from the left support and 300mm from the right support. 2. Place the load hanger at the specified location at = 100mm. 3. Level both beam (A) and (B) by using both of force gauge . Record the initial force gauge reading as R1. 4. Place the load (F = 25N) on the load hanger at 1 and level the beam (A) and (B) as step 3. 5. Record the force gauge reading as R2. The difference between R1 and R2 represents the shear force 25N at the cut section. 6. Repeat step 2 to 5 by using different length such as 2= 250mm, 3=300mm and 4=400mm at load hanger (B). Part 1b: Shear Force Repeat steps as stated in Part 1a but place the load hanger at the specified location (= 300mm) and apply a different set of loading (F = 25N, 30N, 35N and 40N). Part 2: Bending Moment 1. Place the beam on the supports so that the cut section is located at 600mm from the left support and 300mm from the right support. 2. Hang the load hanger at the middle of beam (B). 3. Level both beam (A) and (B) by using both of force gauge . Record the initial force gauge reading as R1. 4. Place the load (F = 5N) on the load hanger at beam (B). Again, level both beam (A) and (B) and record the reading as R2. 5. The difference between R1 and R2 represents the shear force 25N at the cut section. 6. Repeat step 2 to 5 by using different load such as 10N, 15N , 20N and 25N at load hanger (B). RESULT Part 1 – Shear Force 1. For each load case, calculate the theoretical and experimental shear force values. Compare these values and determine the percentage error. 2. Plot theoretical and experimental shear force values against distant, 3. Plot theoretical and experimental shear force values against loading Part 2: Bending Moment 1. For each load case, calculate the theoretical and experimental bending moment values. Compare these values and determine the percentage error. 2. Plot theoretical and experimental bending moment values against loading DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 15 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE 1. What happen to the shear force value when the load is applied at different locations on the beam? 2. What happen to the shear force when the different load is applied at the same location in the beam? 3. What happen to the magnitude of bending moment when the applied load is increased? 4. Comment on the accuracy of the experiment. Does the experimental data verify the theoretical data? S2 - SHEAR FORCE AND BEND ING MOMENT EXPERIMEN T FORM 16 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA ENGINEERING CAMPUS Name: _____________________________________________________________________ Matric No.: _______________________ Group: _______________________ Date of Experiment: _________________________ RESULTS: Part 1a: Shear Force Dist. (mm) Shear Force (Theory), F/L (N) A B Force Gauge Reading, (N) R1 R2 Shear Force (Experiment), R2- R1 (N) C D E Error % Error F = E-B G=(G/B)100 100 200 300 400 Part 1b: Shear Force Load, F (N) Shear Force (Theory), F/L (N) A B Force Gauge Reading, (N) R1 R2 Shear Force (Experiment), R2- R1 (N) C D E Error % Error F = E-B G=(F/B)100 25 30 35 40 Part 2: Bending Moment Load, F (N) Bending Moment (Theory) 0.1F (Nm) Force Gauge Reading, (N) R1 R2 R3 = R2- R1 17 Bending Moment (Experiment) R3 0.175 (Nm) Error % Error EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE A B C D E F G = F-B 0 5 10 15 20 25 GRAPHS: 1. Theoretical and experimental shear force values against distant, 2. Theoretical and experimental shear force values against loading 3. Theoretical and experimental bending moment values against loading CALCULATIONS: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: 18 H=(F/B)100 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE S3 – BEAM BENDING EXPERIMENT 19 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA ENGINEERING CAMPUS OBJECTIVE To verify the theory of pure bending. APPARATUS 1. 2. SM104 MK III Beam Apparatus Two load cells, three dial gauges, two weight hangers, beams (1 steel, 1 brass and 1 aluminum) and set of weights INTRODUCTION When a beam is loaded, the loads acting on the beam cause the beam to bend, there by deforming its axis into a curve. The defection of the beam at any point along its axis is the displacement of that point from its original position, measured in the vertical direction. THEORY When a beam is loaded, it bends in the plane of the applied moment. Theory of pure bending of beam states that stress distribution within the beam and curvature of the beam are related by:- 20 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE M E I y R where M -------------------- Eq. (1) is the bending moment is the second moment of area of the beam section (moment of inertia) is the bending stress at distance y from the neutral axis is the distance from the neutral axis is the modulus of elasticity is the radius of curvature I y E R It can also be shown that the curvature of a beam 1/R is given, to a close approximation, by the second derivative of the deflection. If z is the deflection of the beam at distance x from a chosen origin then: d 2z 1 M dx 2 R EI -------------------- Eq. (2) The objective of this experiment is to show that equation (2) is valid. Using equation (2) it can be shown that the deflection of a beam subjected to direct loading can always be expressed in the form: za WL3 EI -------------------- Eq. (3) where :- z a W L E R is the deflection is a constant whose value depends upon the type of loading and supports is the load acting on the beam is the span is the modulus of elasticity is the radius of curvature Consider a deflected beam which is subjected to loads due to weights as shown in Figure 1. L Beam specimen h1 W h2 a h3 W a b b L/4 dial gauge L/4 L/4 21 L/4 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Figure 1 h a a 2R-h Figure 2 The radius of curvature is determined by the Sagital method. Referring to Figure 2, the radius of curvature is obtained from the relationship: h(2R - h) = i.e. 2hR - h2 a2 = a2 -------------------- Eq. (4) Since h is relatives small compared to R, h2 will become a very small value and can therefore be neglected. Therefore 2hR or = a2 1 2h R a2 -------------------- Eq. (5) Also from equation (2) and Figure 1, 1 M R EI and -------------------- Eq. (6) M = Wb -------------------- Eq. (7) Substituting equation (6) and (7) into equation (5) yields:- 22 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE h Wa 2b 2 EI -------------------- Eq. (8) By plotting h against W using equation (8), a straight line graph is obtained and the gradient is:- a 2b 2 EI Thus when b = 300mm as used in the experiment, the gradient is 150a 2 EI -------------------- Eq. (9) Therefore for constant b, a graph of 150a2 against gradient should be linear and its gradient will give a measure of the flexural rigidity (EI) of the beam. PROCEDURE 1. Measure the length, thickness and width of the beam. Determine the mid-span of the beam. 2. Choose the suitable reading on the upper scale of the apparatus for the mid-span of the beam. (One of the 10cm markers is most convenient). 3. Set up one of the load cells so that it is 1/4 –span to the left of the marker chosen in step 2. (Do not forget to take account of any offset in the position cursor). 4. Set up the second load cell 1/4-span to the right of the mid-span reading. Lock the knife edge. 5. Place the beam in position with 1/4 -span overhang at either end. 6. Place one hanger near the left-hand end of the beam so that the load is applied on the centre-line of the beam. Place the second hanger at the right-hand end of the beam so that the hangers are the same distance from the supports. (See Figure 1). 7. Place one dial gauge at mid-span and the other two equidistant on either side of it as shown in Figure 1. Adjust the three dial gauges to read zero. 23 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE 8. Apply equal loads to the two hangers. 9. Gently tap the beam near its mid-span and take the readings of the dial gauges, h1, h2 and h3. 10. Increase the load and repeat steps 8 and 9 for at least five values of W. 11. Record the readings of the dial gauges in the table as shown in the following section. RESULT 1. 2. Plot (h2-y) against load, W for test 1, 2 and 3. Obtain the gradient of each graph. Plot 150a2 versus the gradient of (h2-y) versus load, W. Compare the experiment and theoretical values of the flexural rigidity of the beam. CONCLUSION Using the results, verify the theory of pure bending. S3 – BEAM BENDING EXPERIMENT FORM SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA ENGINEERING CAMPUS Name: _____________________________________________________________________ 24 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Matric No.: _______________________ Group: _______________________ Date of Experiment: _________________________ RESULTS: Length (mm) Thickness (mm) Width (mm) I (mm4) (Moment of Inertia) E (N/mm2) (Modulus of Elasticity) Aluminum Steel Brass Specimen: Aluminum W (N) b (mm) a (mm) h1 (mm) h2 (mm) h3 (mm) y h h 3 1 2 (mm) Test 1 5 10 15 20 25 300 300 300 300 300 100 100 100 100 100 Test 2 5 10 15 20 25 300 300 300 300 300 150 150 150 150 150 5 300 200 25 h2-y (mm) EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Test 3 Specimen: Steel 10 15 20 25 300 300 300 300 200 200 200 200 W (N) b (mm) a (mm) h1 (mm) h2 (mm) h3 (mm) y h h 3 1 2 (mm) Test 1 5 10 15 20 25 300 300 300 300 300 100 100 100 100 100 Test 2 5 10 15 20 25 300 300 300 300 300 150 150 150 150 150 26 h2-y (mm) EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Test 3 5 10 15 20 25 300 300 300 300 300 200 200 200 200 200 Specimen: Brass W (N) b (mm) a (mm) h1 (mm) h2 (mm) h3 (mm) y h h 3 1 2 (mm) Test 1 5 10 15 20 25 300 300 300 300 300 100 100 100 100 100 Test 2 5 10 15 20 25 300 300 300 300 300 150 150 150 150 150 5 10 15 20 300 300 300 300 200 200 200 200 Test 3 27 h2-y (mm) EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE 25 300 200 GRAPHS: 1. (h2 – y) against load (W) for tests 1, 2 and 3 for each specimen (in a single graph). 2. 150a2 against the gradient of the above graphs (in a single graph). CALCULATION: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: 28 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE S4 – UNSYMMETRICALLY LOADED CANTILEVER EXPERI MENT SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA ENGINEERING CAMPUS 29 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE OBJECTIVES 1. To determine the deflection of a cantilever specimen subjected to unsymmetrical load at different angles 2. To compare the theoretical and experimental values for deflection and flexibility of the cantilever specimen. INTRODUCTION AND THEORY When an elastic structural member in equilibrium is subjected to a load system, deformation will occur in that structural member. The point where the load is applied will displace. In general, the deformation can be expressed using the following expression: 30 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE δ = f × P ..........Eq. (1) where δ f P = = = Deflection Flexibility of Structure Applied Load System For a cantilever structure, when a load is applied at the free end, the corresponding deflection at the free end of the structure is given by the formula:- PL3 3EI ..........Eq. (2) where δ L E P I = = = = = Deflection at the end (mm) Length of the specimen (mm) Young Modulus (N/mm²) Applied Load (N) Moment of Inertia (mm4) Lets consider the following figure. A load P is applied at the end of cantilever specimen with an angle θ, from y axis x d b 90o y 31 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Py = P sin θ θ P Px = P cos θ o 0 X The load component in x axis direction is Px = P cos θ ..........Eq. (3) The load component in y axis direction is Py = P sin θ ..........Eq. (4) Therefore, deflection in x axis direction is x Px L3 3EI yy ..........Eq. (5) And deflection in y-axis direction is y Py L3 ..........Eq. 3EI xx (6) APPARATUS 1. Cat. No. 151 Unsymmetrically Loaded Cantilever (Norwood Instruments Ltd.) with Specimen and Two Dial Indicator Gauges 2. Load Cord Hook and Load Hanger 3. Set of Loading Weights 4. Measuring Tape 32 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE PROCEDURE 1. Measure the size of the specimen section (width and thickness) and the length between the end caps and enter the measured data thereon in the given table. The length of the specimen is measured without discarding the specimen from the apparatus. 2. Place the hook wire ‘S’ in the hole. Set the top ring at 00 and zero the dial gauges. Dial Gauge 1 is the dial gauge that touches the thickness of the specimen and Dial Gauge 2 is the one that touches the width of the specimen. 3. Place the load hanger on the hook wire ‘S’ and apply a load (5N) on it. The weight of the load hanger (1N) is not negligible and must be considered in the total applied load. Record the readings of both dial gauges. 4. Rotate the top ring to different angles at 150 intervals around the specimen until 1800 with a constant load. Record the readings of both dial gauges for every angle. 5. Repeat steps 1 to 4 with a constant load of 10N (total applied load = 11N). RESULT 1. Plot the test results on a four quadrant axis, using the gauge readings. Then on the same axes, plot the calculated values of δy and δx using Eq. (5) and Eq.(6). Mark the points in a different manner to differentiate between the experimental results and calculated values. 2. For each of the data points where you have a calculated δx and δy, calculate the ratio of δx/Px and δy/Py. Plot δy/Py versus δx/Px. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 33 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE From the plot, 1. Compare two sets of results. How well do they agree? 2. Where do the maximum and minimum values of deflection occur for the x and y direction? From the plot of δy/Py against δx/Px, what do you notice about the shape of the plot? S4 – UNSYMMETRICALLY LOADED CANTILEVER EXPERI MENT FORM SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA ENGINEERING CAMPUS Name: _____________________________________________________________________ 34 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Matric No.: _______________________ Group: _______________________ Date of Experiment: _________________________ RESULTS: Specimen: Aluminum 1 2 Length, l (mm) Width, b (mm) Thickness, d (mm) Constant Load Weight of Load Hanger Total Applied Load = 5 N ; 10 N = 1 N ; 1 N = 6 N ; 11 N Dial Gauge 1 Reading without Loading = 0 Dial Gauge 2 Reading without Loading = 0 Value of Ixx and Iyy: bd 3 = I xx 12 ________ mm4 b3d = 12 ________ mm4 I yy a) Calculation Sheet Load = 5N 35 3 Average EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Angle θ (o) Dial Dial Px = Gauge 1 Gauge 2 Pcosθ δx δy (x0.01mm) (x0.01mm) 0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 Load = 10N 36 Py = Psinθ δx δy (Theory) (Theory) (mm) (mm) EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Angle θ (o) Dial Dial Px = Gauge 1 Gauge 2 Pcosθ δx δy (x0.01mm) (x0.01mm) Py = Psinθ δx δy (Theory) (Theory) (mm) (mm) 0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 b) Ratio of δx/Px and δy/Py for a constant load of 5N (Theory) 37 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE δx (mm) δy / Px (mm/N) δy (mm) δy / Py (mm/N) c)Ratio of δx/Px and δy/Py for a constant load of 5N (Experiment) 38 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE δx (mm) δx/Px (mm/N) δy (mm) 39 δy/Py (mm/N) EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE c) Ratio of δx/Px and δy/Py for a constant load of 10N (Theory) δx (mm) δy / Px (mm/N) δy (mm) 40 δy / Py (mm/N) EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE e)Ratio of δx/Px and δy/Py for a constant load of 10N (Experiment) δx (mm) Graphs: δx/Px (mm/N) δy (mm) δy/Py (mm/N) 1. Deflection in x (δx)and y (δx) direction versus angle θ 2. δy/Py against δx/Px (for a constant load of 5N and 10N (theory and experiment) DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: 41 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE 42 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE S5 – TENSILE TEST SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA ENGINEERING CAMPUS 43 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE OBJECTIVE To study the behaviour and properties mechanical of mild steel specimen subjected to tensile load. APPARATUS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Tensile Testing Machine, SM100 Extensometer, SM100d Pump, SM100k Digital Load Gauge, E102 Tensile Test Specimen INTRODUCTION The understanding of the behavior and mechanical properties of the material used in the design of machines and structures is essential. The way to determine how materials behave when they are subjected to loads is to perform experiments in the laboratory. The usual procedure is to place small specimens of the material in testing machines, apply the loads, and then measure the resulting deformations (such as changes in length and changes in diameter). 44 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE THEORY Tensile test results are normally converted to stresses and strains and plotted as stress-strain diagram. This diagram which represents the relation between stress and strain for a given material is an important characteristic of the material. The axial stress in a test specimen is calculated by dividing the axial load P by the cross-sectional area A, = P/A The loading applied to the specimen will cause deformation in the specimen. The deformation per unit length of the specimen is known as strain (). Therefore, = changes in length/initial length The value of the strain is normally very small and it is usually expressed in percentage. Mild steel is one of the most widely and is found in buildings, bridges, cranes, ships, towers, vehicles and many other types of constructions. A stress strain diagram for a typical structural steel in tension is shown in Figure 1. Strains are plotted on the horizontal exis and stresses on vertical axis. The diagram begins with a straight line from the origin O to point A, which means that the relationship between stress and strain in this initial region is not only linear but also proportionality between stress and strain no longer exists; hence the stress at A is called the proportional limit. For low carbon steels, this limit is in the range 210 to 350 kPa but high strength steels can have proportional limits of more than 550 kPa. The slope of the straight line from O to A is called the modulus of elasticity. 45 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Figure 1 : Stress- strain diagram for a typical structural steel in tension (not to scale) With an increase in stress beyond the proportional limit, the strain begins to increase more rapidly for each increment in stress. Consequently, the stress- strain curve has a smaller and smaller slope, until at point B the curve becomes horizontal. Beginning at this point, considerable elongation of the test specimen occurs with no noticeable increase in the tensile force (from B to C). This phenomenon is known as yielding of the material, and point B is called the yield point. The corresponding stress is known as the yield stress of the steel. In the region from B to C,the material becomes perfectly plastic, which means that it deforms without an increase in the applied load. The elongation of a mild steel specimen in the perfectly plastic, which means that it deforms without an increase in the applied load. The elongation of a mild steel specimen in the perfectly plastic region is typically 10 to 15 times the elongation that occurs in the linear region (between the onset of loading and proportional limit). The presence of very strains in the plastic region ( and beyond) is the reason for not plotting this diagram to scale. After undergoing the large strains that occur during yielding in the region BC, the steel begins to strain harden. During strain hardening, the material undergoes changes in its crystaline structure, resulting in increased resistance of the material to further deformation. Elongation of the test specimen in this region requires an increase in the tensile load, and therefore the stressstrain diagram has a positive slope from C to D. The load 46 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE eventually reaches its maximum value, and the corresponding stress (at D point) is called the ultimate stress. Further stretching of the bar is actually accompanied by a reduction in the load, and fracture finally occurs at a point such as E in Figure 1. The yield stress and ultimate stress of a material are also called the yield strength and ultimate strength, respectively. Strength is a general term that refers to the capacity of a structure to resist loads. For instance, the yield strength of a beam is the magnitude of the load required to cause yielding in the beam, and the ultimate strength of a truss is the maximum load it can support, that is, the failure load. However, when conducting a tension test of a particular material, we define load carrying capacity by the stresses in the specimen rather than by the total loads acting on the specimen. As a result, the strength of a material is usually started as a stress. When a test specimen is stretched, lateral contraction occurs, as previously mentioned. The resulting decrease in cross-sectional area is too small to have a noticeable effect on the calculated values of the stresses`up to about point C in figure 1, but beyond that point the reduction in the area begins to alter the shape of the curve. In the vicinity of the ultimate stress, the reduction in area of the bar becomes clearly visible and a pronounced necking of the bar occurs (see Figure 2). If the actual cross-sectional area at the narrow part of the neck is used to calculate the stress, the true stress-strain curve ( the dashed line CE’ in Figure 1) is obtained. The total load the bar can carry does indeed diminish after the ultimate stress is reached ( as shown by curve DE), but this reduction is due to the decrease in area of the bar and not to a loss in strength of the material itself. In reality, the material withstands an increase in true stress up in failure (point E’). Because most structures are expected to function at stresses below the proportional limit, the conventional stress-strain curve OABCDE, wich is based upon the original cross sectional area of the specimen and is easy to determine, provides satisfactory information for use in engineering design. 47 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Figure 2 : Necking of a mild steel bar in tension The diagram of Figure 1 shows the general characteristics of the stress-strain curve for mild steel, but its proportions are not realistic because, as already mentioned, the strain that occurs from B to C may be more than 10 times the strain occuring from O to A. Furthermore, the strains from C to E are many times greater than those from B to C. The correct relationships are portrayed in Figure 3, which shows a stress-strain diagram for mild steel drawn to scale. In this figure, the strains from zero point to point A are so small in comparison to the strains from A to point E that they cannot be seen, and the initial part of the diagram appears to be a vertical line. 48 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Figure 3 : Stress –strain diagram for atypical structural steel in tension (not to scale) The presence of a clearly defined yield point followed by lage plastic strains is an important characteristic of structural steel that is sometimes utilized in practical design. Metal such as mild steel that undergo large permanent strains before faiure are classified as ductile. For instance, ductility is the property that enables a bar of steel to be bent into a circular arch or drawn into a wire without breaking. A desirable feature of ductile materials is that visible distortions occur if the loads become too large, thus providing an opportunity to take remedial action before an actual fracture occurs. Also, materials exhibiting ductile behavior are capable of absorbing large amounts of strain energy prior to fracture. When material such as aluminium does not have an obvious yield point and yet undergoes large strains after the proportional limit is exceeded, an arbitiary yield stress may be determined by the offset method. A straight line is drawn on the stress- strain diagram parallel to the innitial linear part of the curve ( Figure 4) but offset by some standard strain, such as 0.002 (or 0.2%). 49 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Figure 4 : Arbitiary yield stress determined by the offset method The intersection of the offset line and the stressstrain curve (point A in the Figure 4) define the yield stress is determined by an arbitrary rule and is not an inherent physical property of the material, it should be distinguished from a true yield stress by refering to it as the offset yield stress. For a material such as aluminium, the offset yield stress is slightly above the proportinal limit. In the case of structural steel, with its abrupt transition from linear region to the region of plastic stretching, the offset stress is essentially the same as both the yield stress and the proportional limit. The ductility of a material in tension can be characterized by its elongation and by the reduction in area at the cross section where fracture occurs. The percent elongation is defined as follows:Percent elongation = in which Lo is the L1 Lo (100) Lo original gage length and L1 is the distance between the gage marks at fracture. Because the elongation is not uniform over the length of the specimen 50 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE but is concentrated in the region of necking, the percent elongation depends upon the gage length. Therefore, when the percent of elongation depends upon the gage length should always be given. For a 2 in. Gage length, steel may have an elongation in the range from 3% to 40%, depending on composition; in the case of structural steel, values 20% to 30% varies are from common. 1% to The 45%, elongation depending of upon aluminium alloys composition and treatment. The percent reduction in area measures the amount of necking that occurs and is defined as follows:- Percent reduction in area = A0 A1 (100) A1 in which Ao is the original cross sectional area at fracture section. For ductile steels, the reduction is about 50%. Materials that fail in tension at relatively low values of strain are classified as brittle. Examples are concrete, stone, cast iron, glass, ceramics, and a variety of metalic alloys. Brittle materials fail with only little elogation after the proportional limit ( the stress at point in Figure 5) is exceeded. Furthermore, the reduction in area is insignificant, and so the nominal fracture stress (point B) is the as the true ultimate sress. Highcarbon steels have very high yield stresses – over 700Mpa in some cases – but they behave in a brittle manner and fracture occurs at an elongation of only a few percent. 51 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Figure 5 material : Typical stress- strain diagram for brittle showing the proporional limit (point A) and fracture stress (point B) 52 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE PROCEDURE 1. Measure the diameter of the specimen at few locations in the region of extensometer and calculate the crosssectional area. 2. Mark a gauge length on the specimen. These are the points where the extensometer arms are attached to the specimen. Install the test specimen in between the two large grips of the testing machine and extensometer to the specimen. 3. Load the specimen in tension slowly and uniformly. Record the value of elongation at every 2 kN load increment in elastic regi1on. When reaching yield point, more reading should be taken. 4. Uninstall the extensometer once the yield stress is reached. Install the digital load gauge at ‘Peak Hold’. Increase the load slowly and uniformly until the specimen fracture. Record the ultimate load and fracture load. RESULT 1. Calculate stresses and strains and plot stress-strain diagram. ( = extensometer reading/(3 x 50)). 2. Determine the value for modulus of elasticity, yield stress and ultimate tensile stress. 3. Calculate the percentage of reduction in cross-sectional area and in length. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 4. From the test results and stress-strain diagram, discuss the characteristic of the mild steel specimen as shown in the experiment. Make conclusion about the modulus of elasticity, yield stress and ultimate tensile stress. 53 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE S5 – TENSILE TEST FORM SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA ENGINEERING CAMPUS Name: _____________________________________________________________________ Matric No.: _______________________ Group: _______________________ Date of Experiment: _________________________ RESULTS: Before Rupture Diameter (mm) Length, Lo (mm) Cross-Sectional Area, Ao (mm2) 54 After Rupture EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE Mechanical Properties of Mild Steel Specimen Yield Stress Tensile Strength Modulus of Elasticity % Elongation Total Length x 100 Initial Length % Reduction in Cross-sectional Area Cross - Sectional Area At Rupture 100 Initial Cross - Sectional Area Load F (kN) Stress, σ = F/A0 (x 106 Nm-2) Elongation, ΔL (x 10-2 mm) 55 Strain, ε = ΔL/L0 x 10-4 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE CALCULATION: Graph: Stress versus Strain 56 EAA 204 – LIGHT STRUCTURE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: 57
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz