Review MOSH products
and methodologies
Towards a Common
Understanding
Background
• Previous reviews recap - routinely examining how the
process was being applied and how it can be
improved
• Use of standardized FRAMEWORKS in understanding
the process (Methodology & Product) – For Once!
• Answer Key Questions
– How can we do this better?
– Why do we do this at all?
– Is there a completely different way?
Background
• IPO MAP
– Inputs
– Process/ Translation
– Outputs
• Upgrade to Move to SIPOC
SUPPLIERS
INPUT
1.
1. Mining Houses
2. Mine Industry &
Adoption Teams
2.
3. Organised
Labour
4. Mining Industry
3.
Experts
5. Research
Institutions
4.
6. Universities
PROCESS
Potential
1.
Leading
Practices
Occupational
Health and
•
Safety Statistics
Occupational
Health and
•
Safety Statistics
Key Learnings
from the
•
previously
adopted
Leading
practices
Transforming Resources
Learning Hub secretariat
MOSH Leading
Practice
Adoption
System
Identify
Leading
practices
Document
leading
Practices
Widespread
adoption of
leading
practices
OUTPUTS
CUSTOMERS
1. Leading practices
in the Dust,
1. Mining Industry
Noise, Falls of 2. Mine Workers
Ground and
Transport and
Machinery focus
areas - Product
2. Shared learning Service
3. Leading Adoption
Monitors
4. Lives - Product
5. Saved
6. Safe minesProduct
Performance Objectives
•
•
•
•
•
•
Quality
Cost
Speed
Dependability
Flexibility
Compare Market expectations with the service
provider
Quality
•
•
•
•
High accuracy of •
Leadership
Behaviour and
Behaviour
Communication •
Plans
Identification of
Leading Practice
that are in the
higher hierarchy
of controls
Following the
Leading Practice
Adoption Guides•
High accuracy of
Information from
the Mines
Speed
Dependability
Quick response •
times to Mining
Industry needs
(leading practice)
Minimise the time
between a mining
house enquiring •
for a Leading
Practice and the
Mine House
getting assistance
from the Learning
Hub
Identified/
potential Leading
practice much go
through the
MOSH Leading
Practice Adoption
system faster
Flexibility
Keeping delivery •
promises that
have been made
(both for Mines
and Learning
Hub)
Keeping the
Mines informed
about Leading
Practice
Adoption rate
Cost
Customising the •
MOSH Leading
practices for
individual Mines
(operations)
•
Products and
services are
of value to
Chamber of
Mines
members
Doing things
cheaply
Click to add Title
Quality
Importance Performance
Objective – Learning Hub
Importance Performance
Objective – Mining
Industry
Cost
Speed
Flexibility
Dependability
Proposal
• Review our Methodologies – emphasis should be on
trading off between Quality and Flexibility
• How?
• You will get the discussion document/ plan
• Still need to do the unpacking of the products
• Always keep these Questions
– How can we do this better?
– Why do we do this at all?
– Is there a completely different way?
What has Happened
•
•
•
•
Received feedback from SOME of you
Mostly it was on grammar not on the way forward
Important Considerations to Look at are:
Process Change Issues to consider
– What does our stakeholders REALLY say about our
products and Methodologies?
– How much should be repeated for subsequent leading
practices?
– Risk analysis - Risk stories and expert models - per risk area
or everything at once?
Proposal
• Process Change Issues to consider
– Direct Enquiries - 1x professional one during
demonstration/ 1st adopter and none during wide spread
adoption?
– Behavioral communication plan - 1x professional one
funded by LH during demonstration/ 1st adopter and none
during wide spread adoption?
– Behavioral communication material 1x professional one
during demonstration/ 1st adopter funded by LH and
made available to all adopter mines for free?
Proposal
• Process Change Issues to consider
– Leading Practice lesson plans 1x professional one during
demonstration/ 1st adopter funded by LH and made
available to all adopter mines for free.
– Leadership Behaviour - Separate Leading Practice or part
of Leading Practices?
– Leadership Behaviour plan- 1x professional one during
demonstration/ 1st adopter funded by LH and made
available to all adopter mines for free.
– Leadership Behaviour communication material: 1x
professional one during demonstration/ 1st adopter
funded by LH and made available to all adopter mines for
free.
Proposal
• Process Change Issues to consider
– Company level wide spread adoption plans, with annual
windows ?
– Incorporation of CTF Pillar 4 elements into methodology Yes or no
– M&E framework - What do we want to measure and why?
– How do we ensure quality Learning Hub outputs?
– How do we ensure quality execution of wide spread
adoption by mines?
Proposal
• Process Change Issues to consider
– What is the Critical Path and Critical elements of the MOSH
process
– What are the Key Products and Services and for Who?
Proposal
• Review our Methodologies – emphasis should be on
trading off between Quality and Flexibility
• How?
• You will get the discussion document/ plan
• Still need to do the unpacking of the products
• Always keep these Questions
– How can we do this better?
– Why do we do this at all?
– Is there a completely different way?