25 October 2004 NORTH YORKSHIRE PENSION FUND 2004 Valuation Initial Results Chris Hull FIA Mercer Human Resource Consulting Limited is regulated by the Financial Services Authority and is a member of the General Insurance Standards Council Registered in England No. 984275 Registered Office: Telford House, 14 Tothill Street, London SW1H 9NB Agenda Purpose of valuation Review 2001 results Key assumptions and link to Investment Strategy 2004 Results Deficit Recovery FRS17 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 2 Purpose Review contribution programme Funding strategy/ principles Investment strategy/ structure Contribution programme Deficit recovery period Mercer Human Resource Consulting Employer consultation 3 LGPS Funding Ongoing “future service” cost – depends on current employees “Past service” adjustment – offset or addition depending on assets compared to liabilities – depends on past experience Mercer Human Resource Consulting 4 Agenda Purpose of valuation Review 2001 results Key assumptions and link to Investment Strategy 2004 Results Deficit Recovery FRS17 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 5 Key Financial Assumptions 2001 valuation Pension increases = inflation Salary increases = inflation + 1.5% p.a. Investment return = gilt yields + 1.0% p.a. Mercer Human Resource Consulting 6 2001 Valuation Employer Contributions Cost of ongoing accrual 17.4% Less Employee contributions 5.8% 11.6% Plus Adjustment for deficit 6.1% Average employer rate (excluding early retirement payments) 17.7% Deficit spread over future working lifetime of 15 years. Mercer Human Resource Consulting 7 Agenda Purpose of valuation Review 2001 results Key assumptions and link to Investment Strategy 2004 Results Deficit Recovery FRS17 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 8 2004 Funding Strategy - Targeted Funding Integrated funding and investment strategy to target agreed funding level over a period Achieved through combination of “prudent” level of investment out-performance, increased contribution input and/or extended recovery Link out-performance assumptions to investment strategy adopted and liability profile Mercer Human Resource Consulting 9 Equity Risk Premium Summary of historical annual return differential between UK equities and UK Government gilts Actual equity risk premium from 1903 to 2002 9 8 7 Frequency 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 40% 36% 32% 28% 24% Actual equity risk premium 20% 16% 12% 8% 4% 0% -4% -8% -12% -16% -20% -24% -28% -32% Mercer Human Resource Consulting 10 Equity Risk Premium Expected outperformance of equities over gilts Valuation Model: Prudence or best estimate? Confidence in the future? Variation with Market Conditions? Mercer Human Resource Consulting 11 Agenda Purpose of valuation Review 2001 results Key assumptions and link to Investment Strategy 2004 Results Deficit Recovery FRS17 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 12 Membership 10,494 22,134 31 March 2004 44,849 12,221 Pensioners 18,398 Deferreds Actives 9,650 31 March 2001 35,745 7,697 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 13 Financial background Asset returns 140 120 100 80 60 A pr - 0 1 Oct-01 UK Equi ti es A pr - 0 2 Over seas Equi ti es Mercer Human Resource Consulting Oct-02 A pr - 0 3 Over 15 Year Gi l ts Oct-03 A pr - 0 4 Over 5 Year Index-Li nked Gi l ts 14 2004 Valuation Key Assumptions 2001 2004 Fixed interest gilt yields 4.6% 4.6% Index linked gilt real yields 2.3% 1.8% Implied inflation 2.3% 2.8% -pre-retirement 1.0% 2.0% -post-retirement 1.0% 0.5% 1.5% 1.75% Asset out-performance Real salary growth assumption Mercer Human Resource Consulting 15 2004 Valuation Financial Assumptions Past Service (current Future Service (long yields basis) term basis) Pension increases 2.8% 2.5% Earnings increases 4.55% 4.25% pre-retirement 6.6% 6.5% post-retirement 5.1% 6.5% Investment return: Assets Mercer Human Resource Consulting market value 16 2004 results MV of assets Past service liabilities Deficit £765.8m £1,290.3m £524.5m Funding level 59.4% Future service rate (After removal of Rule of 85 terms) 10.4% Mercer Human Resource Consulting 17 2004 Results Analysis of past service shortfall £m -187 -170 Deficit at 31.3.01 Investment returns -120 -24 -23 -524 0 -100 -200 -300 -400 -500 -600 Gilt yields and other assumptions Salary growth Other Deficit at 31.3.04 2004 funding level 59.4% (79.5% 2001) Mercer Human Resource Consulting 18 Agenda Purpose of valuation Review 2001 results Key assumptions and link to Investment Strategy 2004 Results Deficit Recovery FRS17 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 19 Effect of Extended Deficit Recovery Projected deficit funding payments over 15 and 30 year periods Payments made as a percentage of projected payroll 15 year period Deficit funding payment (£m) 30 year period 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Projection period (years) Mercer Human Resource Consulting 20 2004 Results Average Employer Contributions 20 year 25 year 30 year Recovery Recovery recovery Future service (assumes removal of Rule of 85 terms) 10.4% 10.4% 10.4% Deficit Recovery contributions 10.1% 8.3% 7.1% Average required rate (excluding early retirement costs) 20.5% 18.7% 17.5% 2001 average target rate was 17.7% of pensionable payroll 30 year period determined by PFC as maximum allowable Mercer Human Resource Consulting 21 Next Stages Consultation with employers on key issues – Deficit recovery – Bespoke investment strategies Process individual employer results Consider phasing of contribution increases where required Mercer Human Resource Consulting 22 Agenda Purpose of valuation Review 2001 results Key assumptions and link to Investment Strategy 2004 Results Deficit Recovery FRS17 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 23 FRS17 - Overview Detailed disclosure requirements Charge cost of accruals, not contributions Surplus/deficit not amortised through Revenue account Balance sheet asset/liability Mercer Human Resource Consulting 24 FRS17 comparison with actuarial valuation FRS17 More prescriptive Underlying discount rate = currently 3½% real determined by HM Treasury 2004/5 SORP changing to Corporate Bond yields basis (approach to transition not yet certain) Immediate recognition of past service effects Includes unfunded benefits (e.g. CAY) Mercer Human Resource Consulting 25 FRS17 comparison with actuarial valuation The Valuation Long term funding plan Assumptions not prescribed, and can include allowance for equity outperformance Flexibility in treatment deficits – Length of recovery period – Phasing of contribution increases Mercer Human Resource Consulting 26
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz