IAAC Meeting
April 6, 2016
Attendees: H. Ries, E. Leorri, M. Van Scott, S. McGhee, S. Dellana, L.
Katell, E. Dobson, G. Bailey, M. Duffrin, M. Holland, R. Reaves, S.
Morrissey, Y. Zhou, J. Stiller, E. Eatman, A. Britt, K. Chapman, J. Ward,
A. Senior, K. Dreyfus, S. Beck-Frazier
Agenda
 4:00 Approval of Minutes from March 2, 2016: APPROVED
 4:05 ETS HEIghten summary update
Kyle Chapman
 4:10 ARC Review Options
Susan Morrissey
 4:30 Assessment Training Prior to Reporting
Alex Senior
 4:45 Reporting Actions Taken and Results on a 5 Year Cycle
Kristen Dreyfus
 4:55 Future IAAC Meetings
Kristen Dreyfus
ETS HEIghten Summary
Critical Thinking
Written Communication
Total
Count
Total
Percent
Count
Percent
Count
Percent
Freshman
17
18%
22
23%
39
20%
Sophomore
7
7%
27
29%
34
18%
Junior
13
13%
15
16%
28
15%
Senior
60
62%
30
32%
90
47%
Grand Total
97
100%
94
100%
191
100%
ARC Review Options
 Option 1: Repeat same process as last year
Decision Items
 Option 2: Three Year Cycle of ARC Review
Review at least half of the
total units per year.
 Review all units over a 3 year period
 Each ARC reviews approximately 1/3 of their units per year
 Which Units Need a Review?
 17.8% of units (n=69) got all Y’s
 48.3% of units (n=187) mix of Y and N
 33.9% of units (n=131) got mostly N
 Option 3: Revised version of Option 2
Focus on units that “need
review” from last year.
ARC Review Options
Chancellor's Division
Academic Affairs
REDE
COB
COE
BSOM
CFAC
CON
SODM
CAHS
DHS
CET
CHHP
HCAS
SA
UA
Athletics
A&F
TOTALS
All Y
1
6
1
9
14
4
6
5
1
5
0
4
5
7
1
0
0
0
69
% All Yes
14.3%
23.1%
12.5%
42.9%
35.9%
25.0%
27.3%
55.6%
25.0%
20.0%
0.0%
18.2%
11.4%
6.7%
3.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
17.8%
Needs Review
2
8
4
6
11
4
6
3
2
7
5
12
11
36
11
1
1
1
131
% Needs Review
28.6%
30.8%
50.0%
28.6%
28.2%
25.0%
27.3%
33.3%
50.0%
28.0%
62.5%
54.5%
25.0%
34.3%
40.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
33.9%
Maybe Review
4
12
3
6
14
8
10
1
1
13
3
6
28
62
15
0
0
0
186
% Maybe Review
57.1%
46.2%
37.5%
28.6%
35.9%
50.0%
45.5%
11.1%
25.0%
52.0%
37.5%
27.3%
63.6%
59.0%
55.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
48.1%
Total units
7
26
8
21
39
16
22
9
4
25
8
22
44
105
27
1
1
1
386
Assessment Training Prior to Reporting
 Weigh pig, feed pig, weigh pig
 Training has to involve all of us, not just Institutional Assessment
 Possible strategies for training:
 ARC chair email units to be reviewed with guidelines, due dates, etc., reminder of Assessment
Assist
 ARC chairs arrange separate training sessions
 Units that received all yes on their review work with the units that did not
 Other ideas?
Reporting Actions Taken and Results for
2015-2016
Original Outcomes
New Outcomes
• Actions Taken:
• Report the actions you took to improve
the outcome (curricular/pedagogical
for educational programs)
• Should be based on the actions
planned from the previous year’s
report
• Results:
• Report results from each Means of
Assessment
• Actions Taken:
• Report what you are doing to address
the outcome
• Won’t have improvement yet or be
based on the actions planned from the
previous year’s report.
• Results:
• May just have that year of results to
report
Reporting on a 5 Year Cycle
Reporting
• Actions Taken: Best practice would be to summarize all Actions Taken
(curricular/pedagogical for educational programs)
• Results: Best practice would be to keep results on non-reporting years and then
include them at reporting time
• Analysis of Results: Summarize the relationship between Actions Taken and
Results (improve, not improve or no impact); identify area of improvement or
reinforcement
• Action Plan: Develop a plan to address the area for improvement or
reinforcement
Future IAAC Meetings
New meeting request
Day and time of meeting
First Wednesday at 1pm