1 UI Directors’ Conference | October 4, 2016 Chutes and Ladders: Using Behavioral Economics to Get Customers from A to B Nadine Dechausay, MDRC @CABS_MDRC 2 Ladders Effort Balance Precision Chutes Easy Direct Satisfying 3 The Behavioral Insights Perspective • Transforming ladders into chutes • Based on research in social and applied psychology, behavioral economics, neuroscience, marketing • Challenges the standard model of Homo Economicus 4 Humans are, well, human • • • • • • Limited attention Put off pain and speed up pleasure Not great at calculating costs and benefits Limited self-control Swayed by our family, peers, and people we respect Deterred by small hassles 5 The Approach • Start by identifying areas of underperformance • Study the context, particularly the service delivery steps surrounding those areas • Hypothesize about the behavioral bottlenecks that might be occurring • Design solutions that are “behaviorally informed” • Test — Learn — Adapt 6 Common “ladders” in human services programs 1. Information overload Washington child support order modification study (BIAS Project) 2. Framing engagement in terms of mandates, not user’s self-interest Michigan REA pilot (DOL Behavioral Interventions Project) 3. Lack of reminders Indiana child care recertification studies (BIAS Project) 4. Providing critical services reactively FAFSA study (Bettinger et al., 2011) 7 Washington Child Support Study • Problem: Few incarcerated non-custodial parents requesting order modifications; leaving prison with large debt • Key Bottlenecks: Low awareness; Information overload • Solution: Send a prime before full application; Simplify application with an “Explainer” 8 Existing Process (Administrative Order) Complete “Petition for Modification” Complete “Washington State Child Support Schedule” Mail completed forms to Claims Officer team Open case for a modification and justify request. 9 19-page form including questions about income, current support obligations, and child-rearing expenses. Staff attempt to come to a settlement between parties. 10 Intervention Materials Washington Study: Impacts Applications Submitted 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 31.9%*** 41.3% 20% 15% 10% 5% 9.4% 0% Control Group Program Group 11 Michigan REA Study • Problem: Lack of engagement in mandatory employment services for UI claimants • Key Bottlenecks: Discouragement; Inattention; Misunderstanding • Solution: Sent a series of seven emails; Used language that framed benefits of attending 12 13 Sample Intervention Email 14 REA Study: Impacts Impact of emails on percentage of UI claimants who scheduled REA Session 1 and on completion rates for the REA program 80% 70% 16%** 60% 14%** 50% 40% 30% Did not receive emails 71% 55% 20% 57% 43% 10% 0% Scheduled REA Session 1 Completed REA Program Received emails Indiana Child Care Recertification Studies • Problem: Missing first scheduled recertification appointment leaves less time to recertify by deadline • Key bottleneck: No reminder; Hassles of collecting documents and attending appointment • Solution: Simplify instructions; Combine reminder and planning prompts 15 Existing Process 16 Parents receive appointment letter with list of required documents Gather correct documents and attend appointment CCDF staff evaluates documents for eligibility Indiana Child Care Study: Two tests Parents due for CCDF renewal (1) New mailing + reminder (2) Standard materials 2 rounds: same basic design in each 17 Intervention Materials: Round 1 Broke list into four steps 18 Intervention Materials: Round 2 March 1 at 1:00 PM March 1 at 1:00 PM 19 Indiana Child Care Program: Impacts on attending first appointment % attending first scheduled appointment 60 First round • 2.6 percentage points more likely to attend their first scheduled appointment 2.6%* 50 10.6%*** 40 Control Program 30 Second round • 20 10.6 percentage points more likely to attend their first scheduled appointment 10 0 Round 1 Round 2 20 H&R Block FAFSA Study • Problem: Millions of students miss out on financial aid because they do not submit the FAFSA • Key bottleneck: Hassles; Onus is on parents • Solution: Knowledgeable staff proactively fill out form at a moment when information is readily available 21 Existing Process • 10 pages • 100 questions + 72 pages of instructions 22 FAFSA Study: Test Conditions 23 Eligible tax completers in an H&R Block office (1) FAFSA Assistance + Eligibility Information (2) Eligibility Information Only (3) Control FAFSA Study: Impacts 24 Percentage Completing the FAFSA and Attending College 60% 50% 14.6%** Control Information Only FAFSA & Information 40% 30% 20% 54.8% 6.9%** 40.2% 40.2% 26.8% 26.8% 10% 33.7% 0% FAFSA Completion College Attendance Summary • We may be creating barriers without intending to • Look for “paradoxes”- cases where there is a clear benefit but target audience is not taking full advantage • Study the context • Test behavioral solutions • Be willing to fail and try again 25 MDRC’s Center for Applied Behavioral Science (CABS) • • EXPERTISE IN: SOCIAL PROGRAMS (EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, DISABILITIES, EDUCATION, FAMILY ISSUES) BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION DESIGN RCTs TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE LED LARGE SCALE EVALUATIONS OF BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS (BIAS, BIASNext Generation, BICS) 26 27 Contact [email protected] @CABS_MDRC th 15 : Webinar, November Incorporating Behavioral Insights into Everyday Practices to Improve Program Operations
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz