The European Ombudsman A model for national Ombudsman institutions? European Ombudsman Who is the European Ombudsman? The European Ombudsman institution was created by the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 1995 and 1999 The European Parliament elected/re-elected the first European Ombudsman, Jacob Söderman 2003, 2005 and 2010 The European Parliament elected/re-elected P. Nikiforos Diamandouros as his successor European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 2 The mandate of the European Ombudsman - what he does Maladministration Institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the European Union Complaints from EU citizens and residents (also legal persons with registered office) Own initiative inquiries European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 3 The mandate of the European Ombudsman - what he does not The Ombudsman cannot deal with complaints concerning the national, regional or local administrations of the Member States. Gives advice on where to turn instead. European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 4 Challenges to a new Ombudsman institution Scepticism , anxiety Change a culture, traditions – how? Build confidence: - Convincing decisions - Choose battles - Step by step - Time European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 5 Challenges to a new Ombudsman institution Become a natural part of the institutional structure. European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 6 Maladministration Maladministration occurs if an institution fails to act in accordance with the law, fails to respect the principles of good administration, or if it violates human rights. European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 7 Right to good administration Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU Right to good administration 1. Every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union. This right includes: (a) the right of every person to be heard, before any individual measure which would affect him or her adversely is taken; (b) the right of every person to have access to his or her file, while respecting the legitimate interests of confidentiality and of professional and business secrecy; (c) the obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions. European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 8 The European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour The European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour was proposed by the Ombudsman and approved by the Parliament in 2001 The Ombudsman makes use of the Code in the context of his inquiries. The Code includes principles such as lawfulness, absence of discrimination, proportionality, absence of abuse of power, impartiality and independence, objectivity, fairness and courtesy. European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 9 The European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour Article 22 - Requests for information 1. The official shall, when he has responsibility for the matter concerned, provide members of the public with the information that they request. When appropriate, the official shall give advice on how to initiate an administrative procedure within his field of competence. The official shall take care that the information communicated is clear and understandable. 2. If an oral request for information is too complicated or too comprehensive to be dealt with, the official shall advise the person concerned to formulate his demand in writing. 3. If, because of its confidentiality, an official may not disclose the information requested, he or she shall, in accordance with Article 18 of this Code, indicate to the person concerned the reasons why he cannot communicate the information. 4. Further to requests for information on matters for which he has no responsibility, the official shall direct the requester to the competent person and indicate his name and telephone number. Further to requests for information concerning another Community institution or body, the official shall direct the requester to that institution or body. 5. Where appropriate, the official shall, depending on the subject of the request, direct the person seeking information to the service of the Institution responsible for providing information to the public. European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 10 Right to access to documents Article 15 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) 1. In order to promote good governance and ensure the participation of civil society, the Union’s institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall conduct their work as openly as possible. 2. The European Parliament shall meet in public, as shall the Council when considering and voting on a draft legislative act. 3. Any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State, shall have a right of access to documents of the Union’s institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, whatever their medium, subject to the principles and the conditions to be defined in accordance with this paragraph. General principles and limits on grounds of public or private interest governing this right of access to documents shall be determined by the European Parliament and the Council, by means of regulations, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure. Each institution, body, office or agency shall ensure that its proceedings are transparent and shall elaborate in its own Rules of Procedure specific provisions regarding access to its documents, in accordance with the regulations referred to in the second subparagraph. The Court of Justice of the European Union, the European Central Bank and the European Investment Bank shall be subject to this paragraph only when exercising their administrative tasks. The European Parliament and the Council shall ensure publication of the documents relating to the legislative procedures under the terms laid down by the regulations referred to in the second subparagraph. European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 11 Right to access to documents Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU Any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State, has a right of access to documents of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, whatever their medium. European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 12 Right to access to documents Article 23 of the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour Requests for public access to documents 1. The official shall deal with requests for access to documents in accordance with the rules adopted by the Institution and in accordance with the general principles and limits laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001. 2. If the official cannot comply with an oral request for access to documents, the citizen shall be advised to formulate it in writing. European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 13 Right to access to documents Regulation 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents Openness - Leads to greater legitimacy, effectiveness and accountability; strengthens democracy and the respect for fundamental rights. Purpose of the Regulation - To give the fullest possible effect to the right of public access to documents. In principle, all documents should be accessible to the public. European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 14 Right to access to documents Regulation 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents Exceptions - Article 4 To protect, for example: International relations, privacy, commercial interests, legal advice, the purpose of inspections and investigations, and the institution’s decision-making process. European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 15 Right to access to documents Regulation 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents - Refused access – certain areas of concern: Does the document in question fall within the category covered by the invoked exception? Is the risk of harm reasonably foreseeable and not purely hypothetical? Is there an overriding public interest in disclosure? For the institution to consider ex officio. ”Irrelevant” parts of documents not disclosed. European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 16 Inquiry procedure - Written procedure. - Complaint – instituion’s opinion – complainant’s observations – (further inquiries). - Maladministration? European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 17 Inquiry procedure Opening of the inquiry No maladministration found Closure of the inquiry Maladministration found Search for an immediate solution If too late to resolve, closure of the inquiry with a critical remark If accepted, closure of the inquiry If not accepted, search for a friendly solution If not accepted, draft recommendation If accepted, closure of the inquiry If not accepted, closure of the inquiry with a critical remark or Special Report If accepted, closure of the inquiry European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 18 Inquiry procedure Active role Dealing with complaints Proactive role Further remarks Own-initiative inquiries “Guidelines” etc European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 19 Cooperation with national Ombudsmen The European Network of Ombudsmen Advice in outside mandate complaints Queries about EU law European Ombudsman Tina Nilsson 20 European Ombudsman
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz