Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Hereditarily Finite Sets in Constructive Type Theory joint work with Gert Smolka Kathrin Stark Advisor: Prof. Dr. Gert Smolka saarland university computer science 15th March 2016 1 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Constructive Type Theory I based on the Curry-Howard Isomorphism: propositions as types, proofs as programs I working with I dependent function types: I dependent pair types: I ∀ ∃ Coq: an interactive theorem prover working on the Calculus of Inductive Constructions 2 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources What are Hereditarily Finite (HF) Sets? x ∅ : HF : HF y : HF {x } ∪ y : HF | {z } x .y ⇒ nite and well-founded sets whose members are again HF ... ... 3 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Sources Moto-o Takahashi, 1977. A foundation of nite mathematics. Steven Givant, Alfred Tarski, 1977. Peano arithmetic and the Zermelo-like theory of sets with nite rank. Flavio Previale, 1994. Induction and foundation in the theory of hereditarily nite sets. S. wierczowski, 2003. Finite sets and Gödel's incompleteness theorems. Laurence Kirby, 2009. Finitary set theory. Lawrence C. Paulson, 2015. A mechanised Proof of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem using Nominal Isabelle. Lawrence C. Paulson, 2015. A formalisation of nite automata using hereditarily nite sets. 4 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Outline Ordinals & Cardinality ∪, power, TC... Categoricity Axiomatization Models naive set-th. model Tree Model Ackermann Model 5 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources ZF with Negated Innity Primitives: ∅, ∈ (∀z .z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y ) → x = y (∀x .(∀z ∈ x .p (x )) → ∀x .p (x )) z∈ /∅ z ∈ pair x y ↔ z = x ∨ z = y Extensionality Epsilon induction Empty Set Unordered Pair z ∈∪x y ↔z ∈x ∨z ∈y Union z ∈Px ↔z ⊆x Power z ∈ f [x ] ↔ ∃a ∈ x .f a = z z ∈ x |p ↔ z ∈ x ∧ p z Replacement Separation + restriction to get just the nite sets? 6 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Takahashi (1977), Givant & Tarksi (1977), wierczkowski (2003) Primitives: ∅, x .y , x ∈y (∀z .z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y ) → x = y z∈ /∅ z ∈ x .y ↔ z = x ∨ z ∈ y p (∅) → (∀ax .p (a) → p (x ) → p (a.x )) → ∀x .p (x ) Extensionality Empty Set Membership Induction 7 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Previale, 1994 Primitives: ∅, x .y , x \y , x ∈ y, x <y (∀z .z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y ) → x = y z∈ /∅ z ∈ x .y ↔ z = x ∨ z ∈ y p (∅) → (∀xy .p (x ) → p (y ) → y ∈ / x → p (x .y )) → ∀x .p (x ) z ∈ x \y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z 6= y z 6< ∅ z < x .y ↔ z < x ∨ z ≤ y Extensionality Empty Set Membership Induction Without Size ∅ Size Adj. 8 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Kirby, 2009 Primitives: ∅, x .y x .∅ 6= ∅ x .(x .y ) = x .y x .(y .z ) = y .(x .z ) Empty Set Cancel Swap z ∈ x .y ↔ z = x ∨ z ∈ y Membership z .x .y = x .y → z = x ∨ z .y = y Membership p (∅) → (∀ax .p (a) → p (x ) → p (a.x )) → ∀x .p (x ) Induction Dene x ∈ y := x .y = y . Extensionality is still provable. 9 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Our Axiomatization Primitives: ∅, x .y ∀x y : HF .x = y ∨ x 6= y x .y 6= ∅ x .(x .y ) = x .y x .(y .z ) = y .(x .z ) z .x .y = x .y → z = x ∨ z .y = y Discreteness Empty Set Cancel Swap Membership ∀p : X → Type . p (∅) → (∀ax .p (a) → p (x ) → p (a.x )) → ∀x .p (x ) Induction 10 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Outline Ordinals & Cardinality ∪, power, TC... Categoricity Axiomatization Models naive set-th. model Tree Model Ackermann Model 11 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Dening Union Functional Programming 1. Dene recursive equations. ⇒ x ∪ y := R y (λa x pa |{z} ∅∪y px .(a.px )) x |{z} |{z} a∪y x ∪y 2. Prove specication. Recursion Principle : We have no equations for the recursor! So how to prove that x ∪ y satises the desired properties? 1. Dene specication. But x ∪0 y : ∃u .∀z . z ∈ u ↔ z ∈ x ∨ z ∈ y 2. Prove recursive equations. R : ∀p : X → Type .p (∅) → (∀ax .p (a) → p (x ) → p (a.x )) → ∀x .p x 12 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Outline Ordinals & Cardinality ∪, power, TC... Categoricity Axiomatization Models naive set-th. model Tree Model Ackermann Model 13 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Categoricity structure-preserving Y X algebraic isomorphism + homomorphism + bisimulation R a b R ∅∅ Totality: ∀x ∃y .R Simulation: R x y Functionality: R x y R R x y (a.x ) (b.y ) x y → a ∈ x → ∃b.b ∈ y ∧ R →R x 0 y →y = a b 0 y 14 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Outline Ordinals & Cardinality ∪, power, TC... Categoricity Axiomatization Models naive set-th. model Tree Model Ackermann Model 15 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Equality of HF Sets = {∅, ∅} 16 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Constructing a Model From Binary Trees ≡ ≡ {{∅}, ∅} ⇒ Construct a normalizer σ and then a quotient of binary trees. Denis Müller. A Syntactic Theory of Finitary Sets. Bachelor Thesis, 2015. 17 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Future Work I I I Construct the Ackermann model. Finite sets of decidable types. Extension to non-wellfounded sets. 18 Introduction Finding an Axiomatization Operations and Categoricity Constructing a Model Sources Thank you for your attention! 19
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz