The role of the territory for the reception and management of asylum seekers and migrants Ugo Poli – CEI Focal Point Migrations - Project Manager INTERNATIONAL PRACTICES FOR INTER-MUNICIPAL COOPERATION by initiative of the Council of Europe, ISIG & Friuli Venezia Giulia Region Trieste, 13 December 2016 Membership and Geopolitical Context 1 18 Member States with total population of over 250 million Established in November 1989 by initiative of Italy, Austria, Hungary and former FRY Today different status versus the European Union: • 10 EU members • 4 candidates (Albania, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia) • 1 potential candidate (Bosnia & Herzegovina, current CiO) • 3 Eastern partner countries (Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine) Main EU Policies within the CEI constituency: • Enlargement Policy (Western Balkans) • European Neighbourhood Policy (Eastern Europe) • Regional/Cohesion Policy (ETC goal) 2 Membership and Geopolitical context 2 EU Macro-regional Strategies (MRS) involving CEI MS > Baltic (2) > Danube (13) > Adriatic-Ionian (7) > Alpine (3) The CEI is in a special position to support MRS implementation and stock-tacking. The CEI vision and action plan for the support of MRS approved in November 2014 envisages action at three possible levels: • Level 1 > Bridging Macro-regions • Level 2 > Focus WB Enlargement • Level 3 > MRS connected implementation 2 Mission and methodology Main institutional mission: > regional cooperation for European integration Methodology: > multilateral diplomacy and project generation support The support to the multilateral dialogue is enhanced by a strong project-oriented approach both as a donor and as a beneficiary > funding and fund-raising > projects elaboration and management 3 Mission and methodology The sample of the CEI Focal Point Migrations (FPM) > June 2015 – Mandate of the CEI MFA meeting in Ohrid > August 2015 – CEI Cooperation Fund Extraordinary Call > November 2015 – Beneficiaries selection > December 2015 – CEI co-financed campaign starting Fifteen initiatives rallying together stakeholders dealing with migration challenges, who never spoke together in advance. Events taking place in Macedonia, Ukraine, Italy, Albania, Slovenia, Serbia, Moldova, Austria and Sweden, the latter organized by CBSS & CEI ES in the framework of MoU. A new transnational network is promoted by the CEI FPM. 3 CEI Governing Structure Governmental Dimension Summit of the Prime Ministers Foreign Affairs Ministerial Meeting Committee of the National Coordinators (6 in a year) National Focal Points (by sector) Parliamentary Dimension Business Dimension CEI of the Regions (going to be established) Executive Secretariat in Trieste Office for the CEI Fund at the EBRD 6 CEI Plan of Action 2014 – 2016 Strategic Objectives Support CEI Member States on their path towards European integration Promote alignment of CEI Member States to EU standards Implement small and medium-sized projects Convert constructive ideas into innovative results Measures Structural strengthening Reinforce institutional links with the EU and other international and regional organisations Attract public and private funds Enhance CEI visibility and capitalisation on achievements 7 CEI Instruments The CEI is both a donor (of its own resources mostly provided by Italy) and a beneficiary (of EU funds). Cooperation Fund Donor CEI Fund at the EBRD CEI Know-how Exchange Progranmme Benefiary EU Projects Science and Technology Network Networking Universities Networks of Focal Points Other sectoral networks 8 The CEI Cooperation Fund Financed by all Member States, CEI CF supports seminars, workshops, conferences, training courses thus promoting the transnational mobility of CEI stakeholders and international organizations, bringing together people from the CEI MS. Since its inception in 2002 the Cooperation Fund means: • over 900 cooperation activities co-financed • about € 10 million for an overall value of about € 60 million • every year 5,000 estimated participants taking part in the events co-financed by the CEI Cooperation Fund To apply http://www.cei.int/content/cooperation-activities 9 Local Authorities and Migrations 1 The role of the territory for the reception & management of asylum seekers & migrants Managing migration and displacement effectively is important in poverty alleviation, gender empowerment, education and livelihoods thus providing service delivery for all, including for migrants, returnees and refugees. Resilient municipal planning and long-term development solutions depends from local governance, active citizens participation inclusive of women & vulnerable groups. 10 Local Authorities and Migrations 2 The role of the territory The recent migration crisis and population flows provide an opportunity to evaluate the resilience of involved municipalities and communities. Migration and displacement are not new phenomena. The arrival of vulnerable people to already under-resourced municipalities has further tested the capacity of local authorities to provide efficient public services, maintain community security and cohesion, and create conditions for people to pursue better lives and livelihoods. What matters more than the number of displaced people is the receiving communities’ relative capacity to respond. 11 Local Authorities and Migrations 3 The role of the territory As outlined by UNDP’s 2009 Human Development Report, well-managed migration can have significant positive impacts for human and economic development Migration can increase household incomes, improve access to services, and empower traditionally disadvantaged groups, in particular women. Targeted services to migrants and displaced people increase their contribute to resilience, growth and development of the communities involved. 12 Local Authorities and Migrations 4 The role of the territory International Conference “Acting together in migration management Enhancing coordination among central and local level” 17th March 2016, Skopje, Macedonia In the framework of the CEI campaign promoted since fall 2015 a meaningful event was organized by the Migration, Asylum, Refugees Regional Initiative (MARRI), whose participating bodies are the Ministries of Interior of the countries of the Western Balkans, and the Network of Associations of Local Authorities of South-East Europe (NALAS) 13 Local Authorities and Migrations 5 The Conference recommendations for migration management were: • to strengthen capacities of Central & Local Governments to establish mechanisms to prevent, respond to & recover from emergency; • national policy to consider needs / capacities of Local Authorities; • to share information, best practices, knowledge, resources at all levels; • local and regional strategies to be aligned with the national strategies; • to jointly plan funding from national and EU resources in general aid; • solidarity must be shown to the more affected municipalities and regions; • local and national governments from SEE and EU countries to intensify CBC; • in regards to communication, a concept of quality information is due; • enhancing existing and establishing new regional coordination mechanisms, entangling central and local authorities by networking, consultations in defining government policies, needs assessments; • international organizations to support Central but also Local level; • necessity of structured multi-annual support of the donors community. 14 Local Authorities and Migrations 6 The conference focused on the good practice of the spread reception of migrants represented by the Italian model known as SPRAR A follow-up action (MIGRALONA project) has been funded by the Region of FVG and appointed to CEI implementation. Along one year time-span the needs pointed out during the MARRI-NALAS conference are addressed with the aim of shifting from emergency to longterm organized management of the migration flows by: upgrading the legal framework for the cooperation between LO/NA administrations; developing a multi-level collaboration resulting in a “joint plan of action” of LO/NA measures; featuring the “curricula” for training and updating LO/NA public officials on migration management issues. 15 Local Authorities and Migrations 7 SPRAR – The Italian Asylum Seekers and Refugees Protection System The right to asylum in Italy is enshrined in article 10.4 of the Constitution, granting protection to “the foreigner who is denied in his country the effective exercise of the democratic rights guaranteed by the Constitution” SPRAR, what is it? It is a network of local authorities and their consortia running reception projects for people forced to migrate (asylum seekers and refugees) The Main Objectives of SPRAR are to take “on the field” responsibility for those individuals deserving humanitarian protection to provide personalized programmes to help them reacquire self-autonomy and integrate into the Italian society by housing, finding jobs, accessing local services, social life and children education. 16 Local Authorities and Migrations 8 A Central Unit at the Ministry of the Interiors coordinates the SPRAR system. In particular this Unit: Assists local authorities in organizing “integrated reception” services; Collects data on local services provided to asylum seekers and refugees, related procedures and disseminate information; Promotes local networks and projects to strengthen the system; Supports and advices local authorities with technical, legal, health and social assistance; Issues studies, reports, guidelines and handbooks for the operators. 17 Local Authorities and Migrations 9 The Principal Features of the SPRAR are: The public nature of the available resources and the bodies responsible for the refugees and asylum seekers, the Ministry of Interior and the Municipalities The synergy at the local level with the «managing bodies» of the third sector (associations, NGOs, cooperatives) essential to the decentralized delivery of the “integrated reception” services The development of local networks involving actors and stakeholders of the territorial system contributing to reception, protection and integration of asylum seekers / refugees The temporary reception, which pursues to recover independent life-style of recipients. 18 Local Authorities and Migrations10 Strongholds of the SPRAR system are Voluntary involvement of the Local Authorities Integrated reception model to create post-hospitality processes Language teaching as vital part of the migrants ability to play “here and now” Health, psychological and legal protection to recover individual wellness broken by forced migration Specialized mediation delivery to accompany the people in the access to services Reception contract where awareness of rights and duties of the beneficiaries is set-up Access to training centres and professional skills development 19 Local Authorities and Migrations 11 Migration offers development opportunities to communities of destination and of origin. An inclusive approach not only meets immediate humanitarian needs of people on the move, but also upholds their dignity, reduces their vulnerability and improves their self-reliance and protection. In the long term, collaborative efforts can result in greater social cohesion in the affected communities, and an increased contribution to local economies. 20 Thank you [email protected]
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz