AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF SHOT CHARTS
AS AN AID IN COACHING BASKETBALL
IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS
By
Robert L. Wright
Contribution of the Graduate School
Indiana State Teachers College
Number 301
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the
Master of Arts Degree
in Education.
1937
The the s i a
0
,
R~ob_e;;..r;;..t~L_.;.._,;W.._r_i~g_h;;;,.;t;..._.
f
Contribution of the Graduate School, Indiana State
Teachers College, Number 301, under the title
AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF SHOT CHARTS
AS AN AID IN COACHING BASKETBALL
IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS
is hereby approved as
countin~
toward the completion
of the Master's degree in the amount of
~
hour's
credi t.
Committee on thesis:
~~a.~,
-~-4rl-~""~~.
;.:&4~~:~IW-'l~1E+--_.
1Ilo-....
Date of Aceeptance
.:;.:;a,r;
......
~Ma~l~2~5~-t~1~9~3~7~.·
___
Chairman
__
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER
I.
PAGE
THE PROBLEM AND DEFINITIONS OF TEIUAS USED
• • •
1
• • • •
1
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
2
Statement of the problem • • • • • • • • • •
2
Importance of the study
• • • • • • • • • •
2
Definitions of terms used
••••••••••
3
Previous work
The problem
• • • • • • • • • • •
Individual charts
• • • • • •
3
••••••••• • • • • • • •
3
Cumulated charts • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
4
Percentage tables
••••• • • • • • • • •
4
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
6
••••••• • • • • • • •
f>
Team charts
II.
••••••
THE Q.UESTIONNAIRE
The questionnaire
Questionnaire results
III.
••••••••••••
6
•••••••••••
9
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
9
PRACTICE SCRIMMAGE CHARTS
How taken
Comparison of players
IV.
••••••••• • • •
9
Development of players • • • • • • • • • • • •
18
Summary
.20
• • • • ••
•••••
•
•
"
GAME SHOT OHAETS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
28
Use of the individual charts • • • • • • • • •
28
Use of the percentage tables • • • • • • • • •
28
Use of the cumulated charts
•• • • • • • • •
28
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
28
How taken
•
~
iii
CHAPTER
PAGE
Comparison of teams • •.• • • • • • • • • • ••
29
Use of shot oharts
32
• • • • • • • • • • • • ••
Measuring the ability of players
by shot oharts
Staleness • • •
Responsibility
V.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • ••
32
• • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••
38
• • • • •
Percentage tables • • • • • • • •
Cumulated oharts • • • • • • • •
Summary •• • • • • • • • • • • •
SCOUTING • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
39
• • • • • • •
45
•
• • • • • •
46
• • • • • • •
48
The value of shot oharts in soouting
How taken • • • • • • •
• • • ••
• • • • • • • • • •
48
•
48
Chart information • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Number of oharts • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
48
49
Examples of the value of scouting charts
49
•
•••
Summary •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
SUMMARY t CONCLUSIONS. AND FURTHER
•
77
• • • • • • •
78
• • • • • • •
78
• • • • • •
79
• • • • • • •
81
BIBLIOGRAPHY • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
APPENl>IX A.. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES • • • • • • • • • •
83
VI.
,RESEARCH PROBLEMS • • • • • • • •
Summe.ry •.~ • • • • • • • • • • •
Conclusions • • • • • • • • • • •
Further researoh problems • • • •
4P!El'flUX 'B.
'6UPPLEDNJrARY CHARTS
• • • • • • • • • •
86
123
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
PAGE
Questionnaire Results • • • • • • • • • • • • •
II.
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Harold
Bowsher, 1936-1937
III.
• • • • • •
• • • • • •
Shot Aocumulation Statistics for Clifford
~
Forsyth, 1936-1937
IV.
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
Shot Acoumulation Statistics for James
McKinney,
V.
1936~1937
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
14
16
16
Shot Acoumulation Statistics for Wiley
and Opponents, 1936-1937
VI.
7
•
.'
• • • • • • • •
30
Shot Acoumulation Statistics for Robert
34
VII.
Ladson, 1934-1936 • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Shot Acoumulation Statistios for Gordon
36
VIII.
McLaughlin, 1934-1935 • • • • • • • • • • • •
Shot Aooumulation Statistics for Gordon
40
IX.
MoLaughlin, 1935-1936 • • • • • • • • • • • •
Shot Aooumulation Statistios for Gordon
41
X.
McLaughlin, 1936-1937 • • • • • • • • • • • •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Victor
42
XI.
Aldridge, 1934-1935 • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Shot Accumulation Statistios for Victor
43
XII.'
Aldridge, 1935-1936 • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Sho~ Acoumulation Statistics for Viotor
Aldridge, 1936-1937 • • • • • • • • • • • • •
44
v
'PAGE
TABLE
XIII.
XIV.
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Wiley
and Opponents. 1934-1935 • • • • • • • .. .. •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Robert
Ladson. 1934-1935
XV.
XIX.
• • • •
. • • • • • • .. •
90
..
.. •
91
.
92
Wey. 1934-1935 • • • • • .. .. • • • • • • • ..
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Gordon
93
• • • • .. • • • ..
•
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Frank
Kelley. 1934-1936
XVIII.
89
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Lloyd
Ju1:l.an. 1934-1935
XVII.
• • • • • • • • .. • • ..
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Boyd
Climer, 1934...1936
XVI.
..
87
• • • • • • • • • • • •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Woodrow
McLaughlin. 1934-1935
.. . .
•
.
• ..
94
• • • • • • . .. •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Wilson
•
.
•
95
96
XXII.
Wey. 1934-1936 • • .. • • • • • • . • • • • •
Shot Acc~u1ation Statistics for Robert
97
XXIII.
Oolwel1, 1934-1936 • • • • • • • .. • • • . •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for George
·xx.
• • • •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Victor
Aldridge. 1934-1935
XXI.
B1ocksom, 1934-1936
. •
.
. ..
98
and Opponents, 1936,..1936 • • • • • • • • • •
99
• • •
• •
• •
XXJ:V"" . Shqt Accumulation Statistics for Wiley
.
TABLE
XXV.
PAGE
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Gordon
McLaughlin, 1935-1936 • • • • • • • • • ••
XXVI.
•• • • • • • • • • • • ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
XXXIII.
106
• • • • • • • • • • • •
107
• • • • • • •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Robert
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Harold
Hess, 1935-1936 • • • • • • • • • • • •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Otto
Duenweg, 1935-1936
XXXIV.
• • •
• • • •
Colwell, 1935-1936
XXXII.
108
• • • • • • • • • • • •
109
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Nelson
· ·
·
.
• • •
11.0
• • • • • • • • •
111
•
• •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Wiley
and Opponents, 1936-1937
XXXVI.
-.
•
Havill, 1935-1936 • • • •
XXXV.
105
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Wilson
Wey, 1935-1936
XXXI.
104
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Kenneth
Vogel, 1935-1936
XXX.
103
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Woodrow
Wey, 1935-1936
XXIX.
102
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Lloyd
Julian, 1935-1936 • • • • • • • • • • • ••
XXVIII.
101
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Victor
Aldridge, 1935-1936 • • • • • • • • • • ••
XXVII.
vi
Shot Accumulation
Statl~tics
for Gordon
McL.augh1 in, 1936-1937 • • • • • • • • • • •
113
vii
,
TABLE
XXXVII.
PAGE
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Victor
Aldridge, 1956-1957
XXXVIII.
XXXIX.
·
114
Mahan, 1956-1957 • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Harold
116
• • • • • • • • • •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Elvin
Hess, 1956-1937
·
• •
116
117
XLI.
Forsyth, 1936-1937 • • • • • • • • • • • •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Harold
118
XLII.
Bowsher, 1936-1937 • • • • • • • • • • • •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for James
XL.
• • • • • • • • • •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Cliftord
McKinney, 1936..1937
XLIII.
XLV.
119
Shot Accumulation Statistics for John
Hart, 1936-1937
XLIV.
• • • • • • • • • • •
··
• • •
120
Gregson, 1936-1937 • • • • • • • • • • • •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Russell
121
Waltamier, 1936-1937 • • • • • • • • • • •
122
• • • • • • • •
Shot Accumulation Statistics for Edward
J
LIST OF CHARTS
CHART
PAGE
·
1.
Practice Scrimmage, December 3, 1936
• • •
11
2.
Practice Scrimmage, December 17, 1936 • • • • • •
12
3.
Practice Scrimmage, January 20, 1937
• • • • • •
17
4.
19
5.
Practice Scrimmage, December 10, 1936 • • • • • •
Practioe Scrimmage, December, 1935 • • • • • • •
6.
Practice Scrimmage, December, 1936
• • • • • • •
22
7.
23
10.
Practice Scrimmage, January, 1936 • • • • • • • •
Practice Scrimmage, January, 1936 • • • • • • • •
Practice Scrimmage, January, 1936 • • • • • • • •
Praotice Scrimmage, March 11, 1936 • • • • • • •
26
11.
Practice Scrimmage, March 12, 1936
27
12.
·
37
13.
Wiley Versus Martinsville, March 13, 1937 • • • •
Cumulated Shot Chart for Lloyd
14.
JUlian, 1935-1936 • • • • •
• • • • • •
State Versus West Terre Haute, Wabash
8.
9.
• •
• • • • • •
.
Valley, 1935
16.
·
• •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
21
24
25
47
50
51
16.
State Versus . Otter Creek, Wabash Valley, 1930 • •
Wiley Versus State, Wabash Valley, 1935 • • • ••
17..
Wiley Versus State, Sectiona1s, 1935
• • • • • •
54
18.
West Terre Haute Versus Glenn, Wabash
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
06
Valley, 1936
19.
Glenn Versus Ger~tmeyer, Wabash Valley, 1936
• •
53
07
.
CHART
ix
PAGE
20.
Wiley Versus Glenn, Wabash Valley, 1936 • • • ••
b8
21.
Spenoer Versus Midland, Wabash Valley, 1936 • ••
59
22.
Spenoer Versus Ashboro, Wabash Valley, 1936 • ••
60
23.
Spencer Versus Ashboro,
••••
61
24.
Oblong Versus Sullivan, Wabash Valley, 1936 • ••
63
26.
Oblong Versus Cloverdale, Wabash Valley, 1936 ••
64
26.
Oblong Versus Ashboro, wabash Valley, 1936
•••
65
27.
Wiley Versus Oblong, Wabash Valley, 1936
••••
66
28.
Wiley Versus Mitchell, January 11, 1936 • • • • •
68
29.
Wiley Versus Honey Creek, Wabash Valley, 1936 • •
69
30.
Garfield Versus Mishawaka, December 29, 1936
• •
71
31.
Garfield Versus Oblong, January 8, 1937 • • • • •
72
32.
Garfield Versus Gerstmeyer, January 2, 1937 • ••
73
33.
Garfield Versus Switz City, Wabash Valley, 1937.
74
54.'
Garfield Versus Ashboro, Wabash Valley, 1937
• •
75
3b.
Garfield Versus Masonic Home, February 13, 1937.
76
56.
Form of the Evoled Shot Chart • • • • • •
• • •
80
37.
Cumulated Shot Chart for Robert
..........
124
5S.
Cumulated Shot Chart for Boyd Climer, 1934-1935.
125
~9.
Cumulated Shot Chart for Lloyd
~ectionals,
Ladson, 1931-1935 • • • • •
1936
•
JU1~an, 19~4~1~55
40.
126
C~~lated
• • • • . . • • • • • • • • •
Shqt Chart for Frank
Kell~y,
1934...1935 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
127
x
CHART
PAGE
41.
Cumulated Shot Chart for Woodrow Wey, 1934-1930 •
42.
Cumulated Shot Chart for Gordon
McLaughlin, 1934-1930 • • • • • • • • • • • • •
43.
44.
Cumulated Shot Chart for Wilson Wey, 1934-1935
45.
CumU1a.ted Shot Chart for Robert
Colwell, 1934-1935
••••••••••••••
131
132
133
Cumulated Shot Chart for Gordon
McLaughlin, 1935-1936 • • • • • • • • • • • • •
48.
130
Cumulated Shot Chart for George
B1ocksom, 1934-1935 • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
47.
129
Cumulated Shot Chart for Victor
Aldridge, 1934-1936 • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
46.
128
134
Cumulated Shot Chart for Victor
Aldridge, 1935-1936 • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
135
49.' Cumulated Shot Chart for Woodrow Wey, 1930-1936 •
136
50.
CumUlated Shot Chart for Kenneth
Vogel, 1935.1936
•••••••••••••••
bl.
Cumulated Shot Chart for Wilson Wey, 1930-1936
62.
Cumulated Shot Chart for Robert
Colwell, 1935-1936
• • • • • • • • • • • • ••
137
138
139
Cumulated Shot Chart for Harold
Heas, 1935-1936 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
140
Cumulated Shot Chart for Otto
Duenweg. 1935-1936
•••••••• • • • • • •
141
.
CHART
55.
PAGE
Cumulated Shot Chart for Nelson
Havill, 193b-1936 • • • • • • • • • •
56.
•
142
·
• • • •
143
·
·
• •
144
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
145
• •
•
• • • •
fi9.
Cumulated Shot Chart for Harold
60.
Hess, 1936-1937 • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Cumulated Shot Chart for Clifford
Forsyth, 1936-1937
61.
146
• • • • • • • • • • • • • •
147
Cumulated Shot Chart for Harold Bowsher,
• • • • • • • • • • • •
62.' Cumulated Shot Chart for James
64.
• • • • • • •
148
··
• • • • •
149
1936-1937 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
1bO
McKinney, 1936-1937 • • • • • • •
Cumulated Shot Chart for John Hart.
Cumulated Shot Chart for Edward
Gregson, 1936-1937
66.
·
•
1936-1937
63.
·
Cumulated Shot Chart for Elvin
Mahan, 1936-1937
~I
• •
Cumulated Shot Chart for Victor
Aldridge, 1936-1937 • • •
58.
·
Cumulated Shot Chart for Gordon
McLaughlin, 1936-1937 • • • • • • • •
07.
xi
·
• • • • • • • • • •
• •
• • • • • • • • • •
• • •
lb:l
Cumulated Shot Chart for Russell
Walte-mier, 1936-1937
•
152
CHAPTER I
THE PROBLEM AND DEFINITIONS OF TERMS USED
Basketball asa sport has many problems that offer
exoellent fields for research, and this thesis investigates
one of them.
This stUdy deals with (1) the number of shots
taken, (2) the peroentages of shots made to those taken, and
·,
t,
(3) the position on the floor from where the player took the
shots.
The stUdy covers the basketball seasons of 1934-1930,
1935-1936, and 1936-1937.
The basketball shooting of the
members of the Wiley High School team and their opponents
furnished the material for the stUdy.
Previous~.
manr
Coaches have charted their teams for
years, but no definite results of such charting have
been available for stUdy.
H. D. Edgren, of George Williams
College, gave the number of shots taken by his team with the
range, average, and median when winning andlosing. l
This
was the only reference found where any definite information
was given.
Several styles of score books, on sale in Sporting
Goads Stores,have shot charts to be kept aJ.:Qpg".ow.,t:ir:_llhe
. :L H. D. Edgren; ."~ Study of Basketball Sooring," The
A:Qhletic
JOlirntl,
No.7 (Maroh, 1936), 36.
. _'_. , ..
~<~~~"
:X;".
2
score.
One of these suggested the uses to be made of the
oharts as follows:
1.
Analysis of individual team players may be made.
Gains in shooting accuracy over a given period are
shown.
3. Detection of-natural position on floor in which individual player shows exceptional accuracy. Plays may
be developed to use this accuracy.
4. Areas on the floor where the pls.yer constantly misses may be assigned as passing areas instead of shooting
areas.
.
6. The use of this chart in Scouting competing teams
will disclose shooting positions in opponents' offense. 2
2.
I.
Statement
£1
~
THE PROBLEM
problem.
The purpose of this stUdy
was to find how a coach could use shot charts in his basket-
IWJ?ortance
..2.!
the stUdl.
This stUdy shows that a
coach using shot charts has definite information on the
, r
, ,.;2 M. ·0 ~ Hall, ~Sl1ggested Uses," Hall's Il1dividual
Basket Shooting Record Chart. ComstoQk:-J,Uohigan: George E.
I.tis.
1932.
~;'
1
ebility of each of the players on his basketball squad.
With this information the coach knows that he plays the best
man for each position on the team.
This stUdy also shows
the coach definite ways in which shot charts as scouting
devices help him to win games.
II.
DEl!'INITIONS OF TERMS USED
Individual charts.
A chart of half of a basketball
court was made for each player.
At the top of the chart
space was left for the player's name and number, and above
that, space was left for putting down the number of shots
taken and made for the first half, the second he.lf, end the
whole game.
Eaoh time the player' shot and missed the basket a dot
was placed on the chart in approximately the position on the
floor from where he took the shot.
Each time this player
shot and made the basket, an "x" wse placed on the ohart in
approximately the position on the floor from where he took
the shot.
These shote were counted, and the results were
placed on the
1~e
chaf~
for eaoh half and for the whole game.
upper figure denoted the shots taken; the lower figure
denoted the shots made.
Tssm cp.arta.
Team charts were a group of' ten individ..
ual c~arts arranged in two rows of five with a space above
~~em for team ~tatietic8.
Two team oharts were plaoed on a
4
sheet of paper, so that a team and its opponent could be
oharted at the same time.
Cumulated charts.
Each player had a large (one chart
to the sheet of paper) permanent ohart.
After each game,
his shots were taken from the individual chart and cumulated
on the permanent chart, so that it showed the number of
shots taken and made altogether.
Percentage tables.
In this study each player's per-
centage of shots made in each game, to those taken in each
game, was kept.
Percentage, as used in this thesis, means
the ratio of a part to the whole.
Eaoh percentage was
ohanged to its decimal form; the result was carried out to
three places, and it was given on the basis of a thousand,
as .143 or .429, in the same way that the newspapers give
the'percentage of baseball teams.
The percentage of the
team and its opponents was recorded in the same manner.
These percentage tables for individuals and team were kept
for eaoh game and cumulated for a total percentage for all
games.
CHAPTER II
THE
~UESTIONNAIRE
With very little literature available on the charting
of the shots of basketball players, there was but one way to
determine whether or not coaches were charting the shots of
their teams.
This information was obtained by means of a
questionnaire.
The questionnaire.
sent to all members of
~
The following questionnaire was
Indiana High School Athletic
Association as shown by the membership bulletin of September, 1936. 1
SHOT CHARTS
1. Do you chart the shots your boys take in games?
yes •••• No ••••
2. Do you chart the shots your boys take in practice?
yes •••• No ••••
. 3. If you do, please answer the following:
a •. Do you keep shot percentages of each player?
yes •••• No ••••
b. Do you use your charts 8S a guide in determining
the kind of work your team needs as:
Offense? Yes, ••• No.... Defense? yes •••• No ••••
c. Do you select your players 8S a result of their
charts showing ability to shoot? yes •••• No ••••
d. Do you Q~t your squad by using shot charts?
yea •••• No....
.
e. Do you. use shot charts in scouting your opponentsr
yep •••• No ••••
4. Underline the word you think describes shot charts
as an aid to coaching basketball.
.
Import~nt
Useful
Of no use
I
,.
....:J. nJdeiriberahlp List .n, !rhe Indiana Hifh School Athletic
A@Boalation. Bulletin No. 1. XXXIX (Septe~ er 1, 1936).
6
The questionnaire was one part of a double postal card.
All
the coach had to do was to check and mail the card.
The questionnaire was mailed to the coach of the
schools that were members of The Indiana High School
letic Association.
!!£-
The name of the coach was obtained from
The Fans Handbook;2 where the individual name was not given,
the questionnaire was addressed to "The Basketball Coach" of
the member school.
The questionnaire was sent to 786
schools; from which 402 or 61.2 per cent replied.
~uestionnaire
results.
Table I, gives statistics
shOwing the current usage of shot charts by the coaches of
Indiana, the sectional winners, the regional winners, and
the four state finalists.
The questionnaire showed that a large percentage,
approximately seven out of eight, of Indiana coaches were
using shot charts in various ways as an aid in their coaching.
The coaches of the better teams, as shown by the state
tournament, used shot oharts more than the average coach.
This use was determined as a result of many score books giving a
ch~rt
for recording the shots as well as the score.
~e Huntington Laborato~i~st a gymnasium floor manu:t'acturing
company, even give away a pamphlet for a coach to use in
•
. 2 Fana !Jandbook 2i Basketball. Anderson, IndiaD8:
Indiana HlghsQ-hooi GClae; EtS Association, V (1931;; ...1936).
--
·,W«:,c.,vR'3VE
~ ~ f '1-
.;
. 5('-;·';-#56.
.55
t'
n
'f
7f
'..i ll
TABLE I
QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
Question
number
1
2
3a
3b-ottense
3b-detense
30
3d
3e
4-important
4-usefu1
4-of no use
402 out of 785
Yes
per oent
yes
294
158
264
260
208
143
29
257
93
283
19
73.1
39.3
65.7
64.7
51.7
35.6
7.2
63.9
23.4
70.4
4.7
state
regional
winners
state
final
winners
15 out of 16
3 out of 4
state
seotiona1
winners
Indiana
oomp1ete
returns
49 out of 64
no
Yes
per cent
yes
no
Yes
per oent
yes
no
Yes
per oent
yes
no
106
240
115
III
152
236
351
129
309
119
383
37
21
37
33
26
18
3
34
13
32
2
75.5
42.8
75.5
67.3
53.1
36.7
6.1
67.3
26.5
65.3
4.1
8
27
8
11
12
28
43
13
36
17
47
14
6
11
8
7
7
1
10
5
10
0
93.3
40.0
73.3
53.3
46.7
46.7
6.7
66.7
33.3
66.7
00.0
1
9
2
4
4
6
11
4
10
5
15
3
2
2
2
2
1
0
3
1
2
0
100.0
66.7
66.7
66.7
66.7
33.3
00.0
100.0
33.3
66.7
00.0
0
1
1
1
1
2
3
0
2
1
3
...,
I
;
8
charting his games. 3
The questionnaire showed that the majority of basketball coaches of Indiana were using shot charts of some kind
as an aid in their coaching.
3 !!!!_Q_~ Basketball Shot Charts ~ Scouting
Diagrams. The Huntington Laboratories, 1936-1937.
CHAPTER III
PRACTICE SCRIMMAGE CHARTS
Charting practice scrimmage gives the coaoh a
com~
parison of individual players, both offensively and de fena1vely.
It tests methods or styles of play for the coaoh
enabling him to use the one that suits his team the beat;
and it shows the improvement of his team and the individual
player.
How taken. The charts were taken by a boy trained
to chart not only the practioe sorimmages, but all games as
well.
He had the same status as a senior student manager,
going on all the trips and being admitted to all games free
of charge.
He kept time and charted both teams when a sorim-
mage was held.
pe~centages
His job of statistioian included keeping the
of the players and
~umulating
on the indiVidual permanent ohart.
their game charts
He kept no cumulated
ohart or percentage table for the practice sorimmages, as
the time and the
~ke-up
of scrimmage teams were not regUlar
enough to give worth while comparisons.
COnmar,ieon .e!' players.
Comparison of players started
With. the first practioe scrimmage, held on Deoember 3, 1936.
Mahan was a newcomer to the Wiley, squad, having moved to
lI'.:t'r"Ha~te in.the summer of 1936.
In this first sorimmage,
10
Chart 1, he played against the team picked for the varsity,
and took eight shots.
On the substitute team, however, he
took one shot more than any member of the varsity team.
He
had b.een out for football and had not practiced, while four
of the five men he played against had been practioing for
over a month.
Mahan immediately became one of the varsity.
He played either guard or forward.
His ability was shown in
the scrimmage on Deoember 17, Chart 2, page 12, when he
guarded Aldridge, a regular for the previous year.
played against eaoh other for twelve minutes.
They
l~han
Aldridge take six Shots, but kept him from scoring.
let
Aldridge
held Mahan sooreless, but allowed him to take two shots.
At
the end of the twelve minutes, Mahan substituted for Aldri¢ge and Rustimier substituted for Mahan, and guarded him.
In eight minutes Mahan took three shots and made two of them.
His'oomparison with the rest of the squad, offensively and
defensively, placed him as one of the 'first six varsity
players.
This sorimmage chart for Deoember 17, showed the rele.tlva abilities ot-the first six players, and the remainder
of the varsity squad.
The first team, including Mahan, took
. tb.irt.y-six Shots, making thirteen of them while the Bubstitutes took only six shots and made One.
Two of these six
, were- taken by Mahan while with the substitutes.
Six men were far supe.rior to the other seven.
The first
Other practioe
f', .._ ............-..-.•,.•--.. ----.
~._-----
__ ._ __
Varsity
-~_._---'
7
Taken
Made
3
McKinneY'
Taken
Made
Hess
_--
6
:3
Taken
3
Made
1
c. Forsyth
•
•
~ :~ (1.
•
..
•
..
--~------_._.
_-
..
Taken
Made
~.-
.•.
_~
•..
~_.
,
Taken
Made
Bowsher
3
0
G~0
[j
11
•
•
•
()
1
:0-'
•
•
'._.....
,
•
-•
I
0 0 U 0
I
I
I
I
--_.
!
I.
0
--
Substitute Varsity
I
I
Taken
Made
Mahan
••
8
0
'ty
•• •
Take~
ILO_t)
Made
t
I!
Taken
2
Made
0
Blackwell
1
0
t!
•
(I)
.j I
(.)
Taken
1
Made
0
Waltamier
I!
l)·
•
3
1
•
:x
Taken
Made
Hart
~---,--
I
()
CJ~
___
I.
U
.-
.\. t
(j
-- -
Taken
0
Made'·
O.
M. Forsyth
II
9.laken
2
Made
0
Krumerick
--
._-
ORA.RT 1
PR40IDlC:l SCRIMMAGE
D~~~R.·$. '1936
.
,•i
UI
i
I
..
L=_._.. __!
12
r'·....~~ ..·· ....._~ . . . - -- . . ---------.....+...,..-~ . . . . -.. . . . . . . .
Taken
6
Made
0
Aldridge
•
-_
.
.....-.-.-
Mp.han
~~-.,-----
Taken
6 Taken
Made
4 Made
MoLaughlin Hess
~laken
Made
MoKinney
14 Taken
6
6 Made
1
Bowsher
.( • ..:x• ~~
3'
x
•
3
2
~.... - . , ;•. -
•.-
Varsity
•
. Taken
I Made
t . - . . . . -.. - - - - . -....
---•.
Taken
2
Made
1
C. Forsyth
1Pj
---~
0
0
0
'j
I
0
I
----.-f_
--
Substitute Vareity
!
Taken
1 Taken
Made
0 Made
Waltam1er
M.cKinney
I I
•
C_)
1
0
Taken.
Made
Mahan
•
~
Taken
Gregson
'I
I
I
j
( )
I)
•
"-'
'--
•
Taken
1
Made
r
Blaokwell
x
U
u
I
I!
f
~ ~--_._.
.
-.-t-'-
1
0
0 Made
,
.-----_ .
CHART 2
PRACTICE SORIMMAGE
~CEMBER.l'l.
1936
. t=~_ ...-!
13
charts during the year made this difference in ability more
evident.
The Wiley team
wa~
weak during the 1936-1937 season
in that the guards, Bowsher and Forsyth, were weak Shooters,
Ta~les
II and III, pages 14 and 16, respectively.
practice scrimmage, they were
aged to shoot more.
ShO~l
At every
their charts and encour-
Bowsher and Forsyth improved some, but
never enough to improve the team offensively.
Defensively,
Bowsher and Forsyth were far superior to any of the substitutes, and almost as good offensively.
McKinney was a good shooter, but his guarding wes
weak, Table IV, page 16.
Always, the man McKinney guarded
in a game, if he were any t'ehot tt at all, would score many
more points than MoKinney.
A oomparison was shown on Jan-
uary 20, Chart 3, page 17, when MoKinney and Forsyth were
playing against each other.
minutes.
They scrimmaged for fifteen
McKinney got one shot and missed, while Forsyth
got three easy shots and made all of them, although he was a
verl weak shooter.
Forsyth, as a guard was so much better
than McKinney that- in the comparison of the two, he became
better offensively as well as defensively.
Gregson, Wiley's
f~rst
guard substitute, was weak
compared to the starting five players and to Mahan who played either guard or forward.
He was weak offensively and de-
fensively,although he improved in guarding near the end of
14
TABLE II
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
. FOR HAROLD BOWSHER
1936...19Z7
Games
Spenoetr
Greencastle
Biokne1l
Bedford
Al~xe.ndria
Garfield
Sta~e
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Brazil
SUllivan
W. Terre Haute
Riley
Glenn
Btuoevi11e
FarlDe rsburg
Ashboro
Plainville
P:rinceton
:ar~~U,l
Washington
B.osse
Pf;Jterl3burg
Game
shots
taken
9
4
4
3
4
8
6
13
,
Total
shots
taken
1
0
0
0
0
1·
2
2
2
.111
.000
.000
.000
.000
.126
.333
.164
.286
.167
.000
.000
.167
.260
.000
.222
.000
.000
.600
.000
.000
.000
.000
.333
.260
.200
.600
9
13
17
20
24
32
38
61
68
64
68
73
79
87
91
100
106
109
1
6
0
1
0
6
8
4
0
2
9
2
6
4
0
0
2
1
0
2
3
'0
3
state
8
6
P1lnento
martinsville
Game
percentage
6
4
Riley
Fontanet
Game
shots
made
2
4
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
0
~OOO
III
III
113
116
116
119
127
132
134
138
Total
shots
made
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
6
8
9
9
9
10
12
12
14
14
14
16
16
1b
16
16
16
18
19
20
20
Total
percentage
.111
.077
.069
.050
.042
.063
.106
.118
.138
.141
.132
.123
.127
.lZ8
.lZ2
.140
.135
.128
.136
.136
.135
.129
.129
.1M
.142
.144
.149
.14b
16
TABLE III
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTIOS
FOR CLIFFORD FORSYTH
1936-1937
Games
·i;
Spencer
Greencastle
Bicknell
Bedford
A1eundl:ia
Garfield
state
~loomfie1d
Mitchell
Bre.~i1
SUllivan
w. Terre Haute
Rilef
Glenn
Bruceville
Farmersburg
Ashboro
Ple-invil1a
Prince.ton
BraZil
We.~hington
l30Bse
Pf3t~rBburg
Riley
Fontanet
State
Pimento
M'attinElvi11e
;
Game
shots
taken
fi
7
6
1
1
4
6
3
1
1
1
14
7
6
5
10
2
"
2
0
1
3
.0
8
3
0
0
0
Game
shots
made
Game
percentage
0
1
1
0
.000
.143
.167
.000
.000
.260
.167
.000
.000
.000
.000
.367
.143
.167
.000
.200
.600
.286
.600
.000
1.000
.000
.000
.126
.333
.000
.000
.000
a
1
1
0
a
0
0
6
1
1
a
2
1
2
1
0
1
0
a
1
1
0
0
0
Total
shots
taken
p
12
18
19
20
24
30
33
34
3b
36
50
67
63
68
78
80
87
89
89
90
93
93
101
104
104
104
104
Total
shots
made
0
1
2
2
2
3
4
4
4
4
4
9
10
11
11
13
14
16
17
17
18
18
18
19
20
20
20
20
Total
percentage
.000
.083
.111
.105
.100
.125
.133
.121
.118
.114
.111
.180
.175
.175
.162
.16'1
.176
.184
.191
.191
.200
.194
.194
.188
.192
.192.192
.192
16
TABLE IV
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
,FOR JAMES MCKINNEY
1936-1937
1'1
.,
r'·-~--··
..-. .-.. - '.
-
-
0
- - - - - - _ .
Varsity
----,-_ _Taken
'1
Taken
13 Taken
Made
6 Made
3
Aldridge
McLaughlin
.;~x.
•
•
•
·0··
x
•
x
.
....
..
........
_.,-_._.
T~ken
6
4
Made
. _ . _ _ •• _
4
Made
•
Har:l3-:-~~d
•
x
2
x
...
__
.
~
_
Taken
Made
.. _.
3
3
c. F~th_
I
,
I
0 u 0
0
-
!t
0
I
---_.-+
!
Substitute Varsity
I
I
IIMade
T"aken
I
McKinney
1 Taken
0 Made
Wa1tamier
x -, !
. . (I.)
'0
Taken
:M$.de
!
1
•
II
Taken
Made
Gregson
•
I
(.)
3 Taken
0 Made
Rustimier
'J I)
''-..
~~--_..-. -
1
0
J!
•
-
U
•
--
0
0
1Duff]
10
.
Taken
0
Made
0
Blackwell
6
.
L~
-_.
U
(-J~
JI
u
,
;
I
I
I
-
..
CH.6![' 3
PRAOTIOE SORIMMAGE
JANU~Y
20.1937
t=__.. _~
18
the season.
His ability was shown in the scrimmage chart
for December 10, Chart 4, when he played against McLaughlin
for thirty-two minutes.
Gregson took seven shots and made
two of them, but he let MoLaughlin shoot twenty-six times
and make nine baskets.
His net lOBS for the thirty-two min-
utes was seven baskets or fourteen points.
Hart, Wiley's substitute center, was weak both offensively and defensively.
This was shown in the scrimmage on
December 10, Chart 4, when he played against Hess, the regular center, for thirty-two minutes.
He got eight shots and
made none, while Hess got twenty shots and made ten.
This
showed very poor work both defensively'and offensively.
In this same scrimmage Bowsher guarded Rustim1er;
while Forsyth guarded Waltamier and Duffy.
be.sket each.
They made one
Forsyth let Waltamier and Duffy "get away for"
four 'baskets while BOWSher held Rustimier to three baskets.
Dev.elopment~f players.
Practice charts show the de-
velopment of players, and thus give the coach definite statistios on the value of his players.
With nothing except
jUdgment to aid him, a coa~h may leave a better man on the
bench than he uses in the game.
During the season of 1936-1936, Wiley had a bi~ boy
named Oolwell on the squad.
QrJ,
For half of the season, he sat
t,be ,b~.nC3h,du:ring games, never getting to play except in
the I_at minute; His practice charts at th~ beginning of
r~·--'--'~""··"····
__·_-- ..-------------.--.. . - -..- .--,-...- . . -,..-..--
-_._
..
...
26
Taken
20 Taken
Made
8 Made
9
Aldrid :JOe
McLaughlin
--...~
x:,;;t) .. :lj .
..
•
•
•
x, ·x·
x·. •• xx
• • ••
•
-_
Varsity
x
,
- - -..
Taken
Made
._-,~-
':J.1aken
Made
20
10
(5
1
C~1fh
Heas
• x.•
~~3~
Taken
Made
.....
6
B°lr1
·x
_.
I
u 0
~
I ()
I
0
I
~-_.--+,
-
-I
! I.
---
Substitute Varsity
I
I
Taken
f5 Taken
7 Taken.
Made
2 Made
3 Made
Rust1mier
Waltam1er
Hart
0'%
()
x
Taken
4
0
~de
;
!
I
(j
••
•
.I,
~--_._~-
Taken .'
Made
.
....
~:r
(~
0
,.
.~·I.
~:!
•
8
( .)
""'0-
•
•
TakeI1
3 T,ak.en
Made
0 Made
Blackwell
Gregson
••
•
.Ii
I!
•
l)
•
7
2
'.(0• x
-
•
•
-- -,
4
,,
.
2
(~
1 I
U
,
_.
...
CltABT 4
PaACTIOE
D~OEMBEB
.80~IMMAGE
10, 1936
U.
I
1
._....._-
-,i
,
mente
These same oharta showed the struggle that went on
for positions on the team.
Julian at center. MoLaughlin at
forward. and Woodrow Wey at guard were oertain of their
pl~oes
on th$ team.
All year the other two positions were
given to the player who looked the best in praotice.
Ald-
ridge started with the forward position, and Colwell won it
in the latter part of the season.
He~~
Wilson Wey, Vogel, and
ran a Deok and neck race for the guard position, divid-
ing it the entire
s~ason.
summaq. Oharting all praotioe scrimmages compares
"
the ability of the team members with one another, offensively and defensively.
Oharting
all practioe scrimmages shows the improve ...
,
ment of players in shooting and guarding ability.
21
f'._
-..-.
__.- --
--------_.. _-.--- ..,--
_
Varsity
:j
I
Taken
9
:Made
4
MaLau;rhlin
,t)'
(faken
IMade
Hess
,
I
I
------_ ... --_.
Taken
Made
Vogel
Taken
Made
Julian
0
0
3
0
0
_---2
Taken
..
._~_
5
Made
1
Taken
Made
Havill
0
WE.O~.Y
B
~
•
'-f
4*
2
Taken
6 Taken
Made
3 ,Made
0
C. Forsyth Henderson
4
0
I IX·'~
.'(S
u.
---_.---+
•
I
_.
,
_
·
......
..
Taken
6
Made
2
Aldridge
0;
--
Taken
Made
Colwell
~
0
..
0 '0'
,
--
Reserves
I
I,Taken
IMade
Gres:son
0
Taken
Made
r0
1
0
Taken
Made
:a:aft
1
0
I I•
I \-
(I)
Taken
1 T'aken
1
Made
0 Made
1
Rustimier . Blackwell
Taken
Made
0
0
M~ Tr; VlTlG"tr
II
Taken
Made
Roae
3
0
·:1 I
()
I
•
Taken
Made
Barnett
JI.
I
(j
(-)
!
~----~-
-_.-
I
CHART 5
---
PRAOTIOE SORIMMAGE
• •Eft,. -,193~
I
(j
()
!
('--- )
•
0
0
Taken
1
Made
0
Bowsher
.I
1
0
·
-
x
.- -
Taken
1 I
Made
0 ,
Krumerick .
.I I ·
U
···
1=_-_.,,-_:
22
r
t . _. . . . . . . . - -
..
.... _ _ ..
__ .
-
_
._·__._.._ .. _4_. _
~
..
Varsity
1·-----.....,.---- ---- .--....--_.. __._-- -.---12
2
11aken
6
4
Made
McLau hlin
•
•
Taken
'Made
Fore
3
0
•
Taken
Made
~o~r~
o
;
I
W
Taken
8
Made
2
Wilson We
• ••
aken
Made
Taken
~~de
4
1
~~~
Taken
Made
.."
3
1
.1r-'-
•
Blackwell
----
6
2
•
•
•
1
6
0
I
0
2
0
i
I
u
U
.t
I
,
~ - ---'.-.' --+---_.----1-------+ .-:=::=::jl--,----._-.-._~!
I
I
CHART 6
P1U,CTICE SCRIMMAGE.
DECEMBER •..1936
23
--. . '.' ;'._-----.- .. _----------,---'---_._---,_._-,.'_...
r'·-
-_.
Taken
Made
Hess
6
2
T~ken
__ ._-
Made
Varsity
.
Taken
1ia.de
11
2
McLau.~h1in
- •.
0 8
x ••
--
13
4
JU~~
_--
.......-..
Taken
Made
V~6
•
-•
Taken
Made
{)
1
'~,-
-'.
b
1
~1S-'-
•
!
'r
.'
Taken
6
tMade'
2
Wilson Wey
I
I
~aken
Taken
9
Made
3
Aldridge
1
Made
Havill
0
8. 0
I
"
•
0 '0
.j:l
u-·
--
Reserves
I
lea n
ITS.
Made
'Pearce
•
0
ifJ;~~n
, If(f.de
, Black
'!
I
I
t
,!
f
'],1aken
3
Made
0
Waltamier ..
Taken
1
Made
0
RUBtimier
-----t-
-
--_.
2
0
Taken
Made
Wood
Taken
Made
1
0
4
1
l~
O'
'.~ ... ;--"~._--
~aken
Macle,
O'Niel
<'
-
0
Hende~Bon
Taken
Made
Conn
Taken
Made
Parson
3
0
J-,
j- ~
.\ I
I!
•
1
l) -
C_)
2
0
-
U
•
Taken
,4
'0
3
Made
McKinne:v
,- t
•
0
'! If
U
1
Taken
Made
Palmer
.-
3
,I
1
.
J~.
X
U
(,-)
x
,
,
,---
_.
CHART 7
PR4~W~Q~·" SCRlImAG;E
JA.NUA;Rl'. 19~6 '
-.
l
,•
---_._'." .._-.
f
24
rl.._.. .. -...._.. ..... _.- . .
~ ~.'
~.--.
~.a ..- - - - - - - - - ~ . - - - . ..,.-.... - - - . - . - - -_'·_"'~·.a·_.",. ....
_-._-- __._
Varsity
-.
.....
*5
....
Taken
Made
Julian
,.
6
0
W
.
°
Taken
1
de
e1
q:6--
Made
0
[~--
•
•
.._._ ..
-"-"----.....,.----_
ti Taken
8
.............
e.ken
_.
0
• ••
•
Made
2
CO~_
'0 •
----t--------+-----.--;-.----.---,.. '.
. _ ----'!-2 1'aken
2
1 Taken
5
. !L!aken
~aken
Made
,..R_e_El_B-,-........_-+H
..a_r_t-..-,-_--t_ _..,...-,...-_-I-F'_o-rsyth
I
Made
0
h<te
0
O'
•
1
Made
I
I
0
Havill
."
•
.0
x
l-'-'------1t:-----t---···:--_-_l~-__-=====-=--._- _
,
Reserves
3
1
Taken
Made
o
Conn
.,'
•
1·
•
•
t-------+------+-------4------------1t-------I
:;
o
2
,
i
I
.I
•
•
U
I
f
t- -.__ __:__.
<:BART 8
PRAC,TICB, SClUJAKAGB
, ··~.umUy. 19.86 '
,.'
.
I
I
.
,
.
,
26
r'.------·-··~·,··-----
. . - - - -..-.------.,-------.l!-.-.. -"'lT.--.--.. -~,.. . --" .
1·-------.,.---_._-Taken
11 Taken
6
Made
6
Made
3
McLaughlin Aldridge
••
•
--.--....,..----.--.
. . . . .11. -. .
3 Taken
Taken
Made
2
Julian
,II
3
1
ij
Taken
6
Made
0
Wilson Wey
+-
Taken
Made
Vogel
•
•
•
•
•
x
Made
Hart
:•
• •• • •
•
J
4
Taken
4
1
Made
1
Fora th
••
•
•
i
1
---I!--
Taken
2
0
0
"W"~l
•
••
Taken
:Me-de
Hess
!l'aken
2
-~~.
_ -_ _+-
,
Made
Woodrow Wey Colwell
Made
. )-
•
,'}
I
ilarsi ty
x
--_.--+I
!
tieserves
4
2
o
o
Taken
3
Made
1
t--.-....,;~"r_-_+-.;;;.;~~r--_~;.£.::=-r ........----I=H;:;::avill
•
---:nx:-)'
x •
•
•
\
'--
•
j
I
I
I!
i
Taken
Made
Wood
)
U
~ - ----,--+--
___1
ORAR![! 9
PRACTICE aCltUoatm
UUIlARY. 1~36'
.0 ·
x
•
u
I
I
•
6
1
-_......,
f
,.-......-.
"
26
__ __
--------,------_
_.--_._.-_..•-_
.
.
.. ~.
.
--.
Varsity
8
1
~aken
7
Made
4
CO~_
'OX
..
I
Taken
Made
Vogel
0
0
I '0
Taken
Made
Havill
x
I
7
3
,
0
Taken
Made
Duenweg
6
3
Taken
4
Made
1
Wilson. Wey
~aken
Made
Hess
1
0
-
0U
0
-_._,-t-
· :ti
I
•
I
Reserves
I
I
IMade
!laken
I
.'0
3
0
LC.Forsyth
•
Taken
Made
Hart
2
1
Ii
(I
-)
i 1aken
Made
Gregson
x
•
•
1
0
(1 I)
"""-'
Taken
Made
Jarvis
•
,I
))
\'-..
1
0
T'aken
2
Made
0
Rustimier
J!
•
(:)
t-n;-~~-__",..-+-----_t_-----of__--..;.---__I-----.-
!f$~en
6
~de
2
S:l:eb(lnmOr~al
! x II .
t •
~_"
U
__'__-_-_._x_,....._,
.II,
(j
11
I I
U
_--=':::::-':'-':":':::::::'_-_:":':':'-:"::-_,'.-::::::1::=_,_.. _~!
CHART 10
PRA,('J.TIOE SCRlmtAGE
llijaf:1.H li ~ 1936
27
f' .._.....--·.. . . ;.._ . _._, . . _.......- - - - - - -
,--------Varai ty
'-----,-_
.._ -'-_ ..... _----..,----_ _2
4 Taken
4 !li'aken
10 Taken
.....
4
...
Made
1
A1drid 'e
Made
Julian
6:
'Made
0
Rustimier
•
1
o
0
B-; ·0 ·
•
Taken
Made
1
J'!..o..T!e
----+---- ---1-----.....,.-+--------
Taken
Made
9
1
Havill
•
•
•
12
~aken
Taken
Made
4
Duenweg
• •• •
f
U
'3
Made
1
Wilson Wey
•
•
x•
Taken
2
Made
0
Hess
I
b
I •
I
•
1---+---+--------+--+---1
J--
"--
._.s--
•_ _...l--
.........
_
H.eserves
1
o
th
4
~aken
3
1
Made
0
Gregson
h
I
('
,I
. ()"
)
"""-'
•
t
I
t
.t
•
I
•
f
~ .. - -.......- - - - t - - -
1'aken
Made
Hart
o
1
0
•
u
-----+------,-1
--_--I~-_._--,_._.".
CHART 11
PRACTICE SClUMUGE
MAROE: 12, 1936
--
CHAPTER IV
GAME SHOT CHARTS
Charts of the shots in the Wiley ge,mes were taken for
the seasona of 1934-1936, 1936-1936, and 1936-1937.
A per-
centage table for the team and for each player was kept for
i
each season.
A cumulated chart for each player was kept
, i
showing all of the ahots which were taken during the season.
Use
~ ~
individual charts.
The individual game
charts were used by the coach between halves of the game;
and afterwards in practice to encourage players, to show
them their faUlts, and to compare them with one another offensively and defensively.
Q!! of
~
percentage tables.
The percentage tables
were "kept: to show the improvement of the team and individual players during the progress of the season, and to give a
comparison of the Wiley team with other teams.
Use o,f the cumulated ohar,ta,
-..--.
charts for
-......
. . .,.,. .........,;;;;;0;,0,......... -
individ~l
The cumulated shot
players were kept in order to find
their natural shooting areas or positions on the floor •
.!!2J!
taken,
The shot charts of all the Wiley games
were taken by a boy who was trained to take them.
He did
nothing during the game except record the shots taken by the
29
individual members of both teams; and tabulated them by
h~lves
and for the whole game.
He sat near enough to the
Bcorer to get the names of the sUbstitutes, but he never
tried to keep score.
His charting was checked several times
during the season, but he was never found to have made a
mistake; he was dependable.
He transferred the game shots
to the cumulated chart, and kept the percentage table up to
date.
Thus the coach was relieved of all of the detailed
work, so that all he had to do was to use the charts and
tables.
Comparison of teams.
shown in Table V.
The oomparison of teams was
In the first game of the 1936-1937 Season
with Spencer, Wiley shot sixty-eight times and made thirteen
baskets for a percentage of .191.
Spencer shot forty-five
times and made ten baskets for a percentage of .222.
The
offensive power of Wiley was low as represented by their
percentage of .191.
Their defensive power was low as they
let their opponents make a percentage of .222.
For the sea-
eon as a whole. the team's Offensive and defensive strength
varied continuously.
Offensively the
team~s
percentage, as
represented by the total shots taken and made, gradually increased for the whole season.
Defensively the teamls per-
,entage, as represented by the gradually decreasing percentage
0:1:
the opponents, gradually increased until in the Ash-
bora game where It sta~ted to deorease ,and them. continued
30
TA:BLE V'
SHOT ACCUMULATION STAT~STICS
FOR WILEY AND OPPONENTS
1936-1937
Wiley
Games
Spenoer
Greencastle
Bicknell
Bedford
Alenndria
Garfield
State
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Brazil
Sullivan
w. Terre Haute
Riley
Glenn
Braceville
Farmersburg
Ashboro
Plainville
Princeton
Brssil
WaShington
Bosse
Petersburg
Riley
Fontanet
State
Game
shots
taken
Ma:rtinsvil1e
68
60
66
13
6
17
6
6
10
12
10
21
18
9
16
13
14
8
14
16
9
16
6
15
13
12
14
13
11
20
49
6
Average
69
Pimento
d L
68
63
68
63
60
61
66
63
76
Game
shots
made
6'7
41
66
61
61
58
71
63
68
67
46
66
67
64'
56
,Ganie
per¢entage
Total
ahets
taken
Total
shots
made
.191
.132
.250
.096
.120
.196
.186
.169
.276
.316
.220
.286
.213
.230
.138
.197
.301
.165
.263
.130
.227
.194
.188
.260
.224
.183
.357
.122
68
121
189
262
302
353
418
481
657
614
13
19
36
42
48
58
70
80
101
119
128
144
167
171
179
193
12.26
.208
666
711
'172
833
891
962
1015
1073
1130
1176
1242
1309
1373
1429
1487
1547
1603
166'2
209
218
233
239
254
267
279
293
306
317
337
343
Total
percentage
.191
.157
.190
.167
.169
.164
.167
.166
.181
.198
.195
.203
.203
.205
.201
.201
.206
.203
.206
.203
.206
.204
.203
.206 .
.206
.205
.210
.208
31
TABLE V (continued)
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR WILEY AND OPPONENTS
1936-1937
Opponents
Games
Spencer
Greencastle
Bicknell
Bedford
Alexandria
Garfield
State
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Brazil
Sullivan
w. Terre Haute
Riley
Glenn
Bruceville
Farm~rsburg
Ashboro
Plainville
Princeton
Brazil
Washington
Bosse
Petersburg
Riley
Fonta.net
S1ua.te
Game
shots
taken
Game
shots
made
Game
pe'rcentage
Total
shots
taken
Total
shots
made
Total
percentage
45
45
44
57
32
37
39
39
45
54
48
62
68
63
37
49
47
66
46
48
47
61
47·
36
36
10
10
7
13
10
7
0
10
6
6
8
5
10
.222
.222
.159
.228
.313
.189
.000
.256
.133
.111
.167
.081
.172
.132
.108
.143
.213
.182
.222
.167
.213
.137
.277
.139
.066
.167
.184
.310
45
90
134
191
223
260
299
338
383
437
486
647
605
658
695
744
791
846
891
10
20
27
40
60
57
67
67
.222
.222
.201
.209
.224
.219
.191
.198
.191
.181
.179
.168
.169
.166
.163
.161
.164
.165
.168
.168
.170
.169
.173
.172 .
.169
.169
.169
.175
Pi1llenta
Mar~:1nsv1l1e
54
49
68
Average
4'7.03
'1
4
7
10
10
10
8
10
7
13
6
2
9
9
18
8.25
.175
939
986
1037
1084
1120
1156
1210
1259
1317
73
79
87
92
102
109
113
120
130
140
150
168
168
175
188
193
196
204
213
231
32
to decrease gradually until the end of the season.
The opponents of Wiley played different styles of
ball, and these styles determined the number of shots taken
and made.
Teams taking a large number of shots and making a
fair percentage of them beat teams taking a fewer number of
shots, but making a large percentage of these shots. note
Wiley versus Spencer. Table V, pages 30 and 31.
The total
number of shots taken was not as important as the fact that
to win, a team's individual members had to average more baskets made than their opponents, unless the difference was so
smell that foul shots overbalanced this difference.
In the
Wiley-Sullivan game, Table V, pages 30 and 31, Wiley averaged one and four-fifths baskets per man, while Sullivan
only averaged one and three-fifths baskets per man; but foul
shots made by Sullivan overbalanced this difference and
Sullivan won the game.
Use £! !h21 charts.
Shot charts showed the individ-
ual offensive and defensive ability of players.
They showed
the number of shots ,.a player took. the spots on the x"loor
from where he took them, and the number of shots he made.
They also gave the same statistios for his guarded opponent,
eo that the oosch had definite proof of the player's ability
and value to the team.
lIe.surius·the abi1itl .2!playe:rs.:9z ehot charts.
33
Soore books gave only the number of suooessful shots.
Many·
times this was misleading, because a player soared several
baskets in an easy game; but when he oame to a hard game
where guarding was better, he was useless to the team.
Shot
oharts revealed these weak players before they became permanent parts of the team.
Ladson, Table VI. a forward on the 1934-1935 Wiley
team, was a player who looked good in the first game of the
season, but he did not live up to expectations.
In the
first game he made three' baskets out of ten shots, and considered himself a permanent forward on the team.
In the
seoond game he made no baskets out of four shots; the third
game. one basket out of five shots; the fourth game, one basket out of ten shots; and in the fifth game, one basket out
of six shots.
He made six baskets out of thirty-five shots
for the five games or an average of one and one-fifth baskets out of seven shots per game.
In the sixth game Mc-
Laughlin. who had been substituting and making an average of
two baskets out of
game, took
~ight
shots for the time he was in the
Ladson's~place.
McLaughlin on the bench had more
pdtential pdwer than Ladson who waS playing the regular po...
sition for the first five games.
For the Season Ladson shot 108 times and made sixteen
basketsfo~ an average peroentage o,f .148. Table VI. Mc-
Laughl:l.n S1101: 180 times and made thirty-seven baskets for an
34
TABLE VI
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR ROBE5T LADSON
1934-1935
Games
Reitz
Vinoennes
Brazil
Garfield
State lf
Bloomfield
Concannon
state
Garfield
Prinoeton
Bpas~
Clinton
Iioney Creek
BrazilWe.ebington
w. ~erre Haute
Riley
State
Garfield
Linton.
,
Game
shots
taken
Game
shots
made
10
3
1
1
1
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
5
0
5
10
6
4
12
12
6
0
3
4
10
4
0
1
7
rz
2
1
a
4:
0
Game
percentage
.300
.200
.100
.167
.260
.260
.083
.000
.000
.000
.000
.100
.000
.000
1.000
.000
.429
.000
.000
.000
Total
shots
taken
10
10
Total
shots
made
3
4
2~
~
31
35
47
69
66
65
68
72
82
86
86
87
94
101
105
104
108
6
7
10
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
13
13
16
16
16
16
*Theae figures were for the first half of this game.
1'otal
percent ..
age
.300
.267
.200
.194
.200
.213
.186
.16'9
.16e
.162
.163
.146
.140
.140
.149
.138
.158
.165
.154
.148
35
average percentage of .206, Table VII.
The time played for
,
the whole season was practically the same, yet there was
.058 difference in their value to the team in
favor.
McLaughlin~s
This difference would probably have been more if Mc-
Laughlin had played in the first five games, obtaining the
experience and becoming acclimated to his team mates.
Lad-
son, who had become careless in his shooting after the first
game, settled down to work after being benched, and regained
a position on the team.
Staleness.
Shot charts show staleness in individual
players, and in the team as a whole.
Wiley, after beating
Brazil by a big margin. became ove r"'confi dent , and this re ...
suIted in their beooming stale.
In the game with SUllivan,
they took forty-one shots, the lowest number taken in any
game all season. note Table V, pages 30 and 31.
Again, in
the seoond BraZil game. with the top-heavy score of the
first game in mind, the Wiley team again became over-confident, and again the number of their shots went down, Table
V, pages 30 and 31.
They took only forty-six shots and made
Six baskets for a game percentage of .130.
In the regional
game, with Martinsville. Wiley showed staleness by hitting
far below their average, Chart 12, page 37.
In the first
half Wiley shot twenty-four times and made only one basket.
Their season's average fOr the first' half was six baskets.
Mart1nav111e shot'twenty-six times and made aeven baskets.
36
TABLE VII
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR GORDON MCLAUGHLIN
1934-193b
Games
Reit~
Vincennes
Brazil
Garfield
Sta.te*
Bloomfield
Concannon
State
Garfield
Princeton
Bosse
Clinton
Honey Creek
Brazil
Washington
W. Terre Haute
Riley
Sta.te
Garfield
Linton
Game
shots
taken
0
8
8
7
B
9
11
16
16
16
9
10
10
14
6
'1
7
10
'4
O'
Game
shots
made
Game
percentage
Total
shots
taken
a
.000
.375
.250
.143
.260
.000
.545
.260
.063
.000
.000
.100
.300
.429
.167
.429
.143
.100
.222
.000
0
8
16
23
31
40
51
67
83
98
107
117
127
141
147
164
161
171
180
180
3
2
1
2
0
6
4
1
0
0
1
3
6
1
3
1
1
2
0
Total
shots
made
0
3
5
6
8
8
14
18
19
19
19
20
23
29
30
33
34
35
37
37
*Theae figures were for the fi rst half' of this game.
Total
percentage
.000
.375
.313
.261
.3bb
.200
.275
.269
.229
.193
.178
.171
.181
.206
.204
.214
.211
.206
.206
.206
37
------1:---------1---------+--------)
o 2 2 I
3
5
1
1
2
. 0
o
Gre
.I ·
•
•
U
•
o
1
12
0
0
Waltamier 8_
x
•
I
•
I - - - - + - - - + -...s..- - - - - . - + - - - - + - - - ......L..
~!
First half
Shots taken
26
Shots made
7
Martinsville
14
7
8
16
6
Second half
32
11
2
7
I
0
_
~ota1
68
18
2
2
6101101
022
6 Holler
14 Prewitt~1~2~~~C~r~am~e~r~~9~
·1 J.
•• ·1. •
(~)
• .(:.)..
•
•
•
x
0
x
• •
u
f
t .•
r
.'"
.
.
.------f-----.-!
_+___
C~T ],8
WILEY VERSUS MARTINSVILLE
MAROB, 13,. 193'1
38
If Wiley had been hitting her regular quota of six baskets
per first half, the game would have been fairly even.
In
the second he.lf, Wiley again fell down on her average number
of seven baskets, making only five baskets out of twentyfive shots.
Martinsville shot thirty-two times during the
last half, and made eleven baskets.
For the whole game Wi-
ley shot forty-nine times and made six baskets; and let Martinsville shoot fifty-eight times and make eighteen baskets,
the greatest number of baskets scored against Wiley all of
the season.
Staleness was shown more by Wiley's defense or
guarding than by her offensive work.
The type of defense
set up by Martinsville would account for the lack of offense,
but not for the lack of defense which could only be attributed to staleness.
Responsibility.
The individual shot charts enabled
the coach to hold eaoh player responsible for his scoring,
and lack of scoring; and for the scoring or lack of scoring
of his guarded opponent.
did not make the
ba~ket,
Players shooting, although they
enabled other players to shoot from
the rebound and make the basket.
The Wiley coach, between halves of the game, encour'aged the players who had not been shooting to shoot more; or
t~
take !Dore oareful shotsi! they had not been hitting; and
showed them their guarding record as shown by the shots and
baakets of theIr'guarded opponent.
The sight of the shot
39
ohart with the shooting record of
ea~h
man spurred ea,ch
player on the Wiley team to greater efforts during the second half of the game, so that their scoring was usually
higher during the second half, and their opponent's scoring
was usually less.
Percentage tables.
A percentage table, for each
player on the team, the same as Table V, pages 30 and 31,
kept for the team, was kept, showing the number of shots
ken and made with the results cumulated game by game.
ta~
These
tables. Appendix A., pages 87-122, in most cases. showed the
gradual improvement of the player as the season progressed.
His average peroentage of shots made to those taken was
greater at the end of the Season than at the beginning.
This increase or improvement might not show in anyone game,
but a,ver a number of games, it did.
For the same reason
players improved from season to season.
Percentage tables
for McLaughlin, Tables VII. VIII, and IX, pages 36, 40. and
41, respectively, and Aldridge, Tables X, XI, and XII, pages
42, 43. and 44,
res~ectively.
th$s gradual improvement.
over a three year period show
McLaughlin. for the season of
1934-1936, took 180 shots and made thirty-seven for an aver-
age peroentage of ,206; for the season of 1936-1936, he took
506 shots a~d made 106 baskets for an average percentage of
.209; and for the season of 1936-1937, he took 470 shots and
mad~ 106 baskets" for an average peroentage of .226.
Aldridge.
40
TABLE VIII
SHOT ACCU1IDLATION STATISTICS
FOR GORDON MCLAUGHLIN
192)5-1936
Games
Reitz
Bicknell
Vincennes
Greenfield
Garfield
State
Brazil
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Honey Creek
Concannon
Glenn
Tangier
Marshall
Bridgeport
Oblong
Pr1nc~ton
Boss$
Su.11:l,van
Iarazil
W$.!3hington
~reencaatle
PEttersburg
Qlenn
Riley
i'onte.net
G&.r:f1eld
Sp~~cer
MI.lrtinaville
Game
shots
taken
Game
shots
made
Game
pe'rcentage
Total
shots
taken
19
20
lb
18
3
2
0
1
9
2
11
6
3
4
3
6
.ltl8
.100
.000
.056
.222
.645
.200
.444
.176
.250
.600
.143
.266
.200
.130
.429
.18b
.118
.267
.259
.067
.160
.417
.300
.286
.222
.211
.200
.158
19
39
04
72
81
92
107
116
133
157
163
177
191
201
224
238
265
282
312
339
354
379
391
411
418
446
464
489
1£5
9
17
24
6
14
14
10
23
14
27
17
30
27
16
26
12
20
7
27
19
3
2
4
2
3
6
5
2
8
7
1
4
5
6
2
6
4
25
{)
19
3
~08
Total
shots
made
3
6
5
6
8
14
17
21
24
30
33
36
39
41
44
bO
6b
c7
65
72
73
77
82
88
90
96
100
106
108
:1,'otal
percentage
.158
.128
.093
.083
.099
.162
.169
.181
.180
.191
.202
.197
.204
.203
.196
.210
.208
.202
.209
.212
.206
.203
.210
.214
.215
.216
.216
.216
.213
41
TABLE IX
SHOT ACCutIDLATION STATISTICS
FOR GORDON MCLAUGHLIN
1936-1937
Games
Spencer
Greencastle
Bicknell
B~dford
Alexandria
Gl3.rfield
State
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Brazil
Sullivan
w. Terre Haute
Riley
Glenn
Bru(u~vi11e
Farmersburg
Aahboro
Pl~1nvi11e
Prinoeton
Braail
Waehington
Bj)Qel~
P~tersburg
Riley
Fontanet"
&te.1;e
l'ifue:nt 0
MartinSVille
.
,
,
.
Game
shots
taken
Game
shots
made
,Game
percentage
Total
shots
taken
0
0
18
30
16
20
14
19
2&
20
9
10
19
16
0
20
22
18
16
13
29
0
0
6
4
1
2
3
3
9
6
.000
.000
.333
.133
.063
.100
.214
.168
.346
.250
.b66
.400
.368
.188
.000
.100
.364
.167
.188
.077
.241
.160
.269
.200
.273
.143
.348
.167
0
0
18
48
64
84
<38
117
143
163
172
182
201
217
217
237
269
277
293
306
335
356
382
397
408
429
452
470
20
2~
16
11
21
23
18
6
4
7
3
0
2
8
3
3
1
7
3
7
3
5
3
8
3
~lotal
shots
made
0
0
6
10
11
13
16
1<3
28
33
38
42
49
52
b2
64
62
66
68
69
76
79
86
89
92
96
103
106
Total
percentage
.000
.000
.333
.208
.172
.15ti
.163
.162
.196
.202
.221
.231
.244
.240
.240
.228
.239
.236
.232
.225
.227
.223
.226
.244 ;
.225
.221
.228
.226
42
~lABLE
X
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR VICTOR ALDRIDGE
lS34-l936
Games
Reitz
Vincennes
:Brazil
G~rfield
state*
Bloomfield
Concannon
State
Garfield
Princeton
Boasl:\
Clinton
Honel Creek
Brazil
Washington
W. Terre Haute
Riley
state
Garfield
Linton
Game
shots
taken
a
a
a
0
a
a
a
a
a
0
4
6
4
9
13
8
10
7
~
0
Game
shots
made
Game
percentage
0
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.200
.167
.750
.333
.076
.2tiO
.100
.143
.000
.000
a
a
a
a
a
a
0
a
0
1
1
3
3
1
2
1
1
a
a
Total
shots
taken
0
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
4
10
14
23
36
44
54
61
65
65
Total
shots
made
a
a
a
a
a
0
0
0
a
a
1
2
{)
8
9
11
12
13
13
13
*Theae figures were for the first half" of this game.
Total
percentage
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.250
.200
.357
.348
.250
.250
.222
.213
.200
.200
43
1
1
'j
~ABLE
XI
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR VICTOR ALDRIDGE
1936-1936
1
'I
;1
Game
shots
taken
Game
shots
made
Game
percentage
1'otal
shots
taken
Reitz
Bicknell
Vincennes
Greenfield
Garfield
State
8
3
6
9
10
10
17
17
14
7
9
12
.126
.000
.200
.000
.100
.300
.333
.176
.233
.143
.143
.333
.260
.600
.273
.600
.313
.000
.000
.000
.000
.111
.260
.000
.600
.000
.000
.333
.260
8
11
16
26
35
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Roney Creek
Concannon
Glenn
Tangier
JJafshal1
Bridgeport
Oblong
Princeton
Bosse
1
0
1
0
1
3
2
3
4
2
1
3
3
3
3
2
/1
Games
I,
,)
Total
shots
made
~'otal
percent ...
age
I
i
;
,I
.,I
I
.d
i
.1
.,f
~1
':'J
.,
i
Br~zil
6
b
11
4
16
6
6
S~llivan
0
1
3
8
0
Pf;lt.~rsbllrg
4~
Brazil
We.lilhington
Gl'ElElncast1e
9
Qlenn
Riley
6
Gf;\:ff1eld
0
0
,8p,ncer
:Mart inl1vi l1a
8
F..,n~anet
.,
-
"
0
6
0
0
1
1
0
:;
0
a
2
2
46
61
68
85
99
106
lIb
127
132
143
147
163
169
170
173
181
190
194
194
200
200
200
206
214
1
1
2
2
3
6
8
11
16
17
18
21
24
27
30
32
Z7
37
37
37
37
38
39
39
42
42
42
44
46
.126
.091
.126
.080
.086
.133
.167
.162
.176
.172
.170
.183
.189
.206
.210
.218
.227
.219
.218
.214
.204
.200
.201
.201
.210
.210
.210
.214
.216
44
TABLE XII
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR VICTOR ALDRIDGE
1936-1937
Games
Spencer
Greencastle
Bicknell
Bedford
Alexandria
Garfield
State
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Brazil
Sullivan
w. Terre Haute
Riley
Glenn
Bru,ceville
FafDleraburg
Ash1;loro
Ple,invil1e
P~inceton
B;fazil
Washington
Bosse
Petersburg
R~ley
Fontanet
~te,te
Pitnento
1I4a.~t1nsvil16
.f .
"
Game
shots
taken
14
10
11
10
13
8
14
14
11
13
9
16
9
14
18
14
10
11
16
17
17
22
18'·
16
20
20
16
6
Game
shots
made
Game
percentage
Total
shots
taken
4
1
0
2
2
3
3
3
3
6
3
.286
.100
.000
.200
.164
.375
.214
.214
.273
.386
.333
.375
.222
.214
.066
.214
.300
.000
.188
.176
.235
.182
.167
.333
.200
.100
.500
.200
14
24
6
2
3
1
3
:3
0
3
3
4
4
3
6
4
2
8
1
Total
shots
made
4
5
35
5
45
58
64
78
92
103
116
125
141
160
164
182
196
206
217
233
260
267
289
307
7
9
12
15
18
21
26
29
36
37
40
41
44
47
47
60
53
67
61
64
69
73
75
83
84
322
342
362
378
383
Total
percentage
.286
.208
.143
.156
.155
.188
.192
.196
.204
.224
.232
.248
~247
.244
.226
.224
.228
.217
.216
.212
.213
.211
.208
.214
.214
.207
.220
.219
45
for the season of 1934-1935, took sixty-five shots and made
thirteen baskets for an average percentage of .200; for the
season of 1935-1936, he took 214 shots and made forty-six
baskets for an average percentage of .215; and for the season of 1936-1937, he took 383 shots and made eighty baskets
for a.n a.verage percentage of .219.
The team as a whole showed this improvement for the
season.
For the first five games of the 1936-1937 season,
Wiley shot 302 times and made forty-eight baskets for a percentage of .159, Table V, pages 30 and 31.
For the last
five games Wiley shot 279 times and made sixty-four baskets
for a percentage of .229.
!l'he coach checked his coaching
methods by this improvement.
If it had not appeared, then
it would have been time to have changed the method of coaching.
Over a period of years, this improvement in the team
should show the effectiveness of different methods or styles
of play.
Cumulated charts.
A permanent cumulated chart was
kept for ea.oh player . on the team showing all of the shots
that were made and missed.
These oharts for the seasons of
1934-1935, 1935-1936, and 1936.1937 are found in Appendix
B•• pages 124..162.
After each game was played, the shots
taken during the game were transferred from the indiVidual
ohart to the cumulated ohart.
This chart showed: the side
of the floorfrom·wh1oh the player naturally shot; the area
46
on the floor from where he hit a great percentage of his
shots; and the areas from where he hit very few shots.
This
knowledge was used in placing players on the team, and in
bUilding team offense or plays to fit certain players.
Wi-
ley's style of play for the season of 193n-1936 was built
around the ability of Julian to play on the pivot line and
hit a large percentage of his shots there. Chart 13.
Summarl.
Shot charts of games gave the Wiley ooaoh
definite information about the offensive and defensive ability of eaoh one of his players; they showed the improvement
of his team; and enabled him to use the knowledge they gave
him in planning the coaching of his team.
47
f.:) "
.-:--- ,
'"·X,,-xj~··~l"~.'i
•'.X,
.,Jet..
teA
,! "" .X' •
x
,
•
X.
X
x
X
,
,
•
•
,
,
I
".A:
• •
• • ,
X
X'
• •
,
•
•
X'%
.,
• 'x' X ,
X
i. ' X
X.~
·X'~X
I':: 'x,
•
•
,
,
e"
y ,.
x~·
X'D-..
•
~~~~~,,)A
/£.
f.
. ,.'
, l ,.',
•••
X,.
•.
".
'...
•
'
,..
.X.
\ X.'
"~"'"
.
'
"
•
•
".
"--- -, ."".-~ ..,.
•
•
I
X / X
//.
••
••
••
.: •
•
"
".
•
•
••
\
.
'
• -', X
,X-,
-iX e '\ •
'\
X \,
{.
.·x .:
; , ,x x.
\
'x
x·
,
,
X
•
'x"-X"X
!
•
#
,
v·
I
J
\
I
I
- - _ . _ - _.. - "'1
.. .. ,
/
~: ,
'.
/
'- - ,.-'
"
L
.,'
~-""-------~--~,-------
CHART 13
,~
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR LLOYD JULIAN
193b-1936
CHAPTER V
SCOUTING
The value of shot charts in scouting.
The use of
shot charts in scouting gave definite information about the
offensive and defensive ability of each player on the opponent's team.
The use of shot charts revealed the poor shoot-
er or shooters on the team.
They showed weak and strong
shooters in certain areas or spots on the floor.
Charts
showed the guarding ability of each player by the number of
shots he allowed his guarded opponent to take.
The coach
used this knowledge to advantage in assigning guards to certain men or areas; and in planning the type of game to play
·
J
'1
against this team.
How taken.
The charts, to be accurate, were taken by
one person who was trained for the position.
The charts were
tabulated by halves, and for the whole game.
Ohart information.
The ohart gave the number of shots
taken by eaoh player during the game.
It showed the spots on
the floor from where each player took his shots.
The charts
showed certain players shooting and hitting from certain
spots or areas.
They showed team plays or styles of play that
resulted in a team taking all of their shots from one or more
definite spate or areas.
They showed shots taken as a result
49
of plays being built around a star player.
Number of charts.
As many charts as possible were
taken of dangerous opponents.
Each chart aided the others
in showing the defensive and offensive ability of a team.
One chart showed a player's actions in that game only, but
several charts showed his average actions or ability.
Examples of
~
value of scouting charts.
1935, Wiley played State High School three times.
In 1934The first
time was a scheduled game, and was won by State by a score
of 34 to 25.
Wiley had not scouted them and had no shot
charts of their games.
thirteen points.
l~scari,
their high scorer, made
The second game was in the final game of
the Wabash Valley Preliminaries.
Wiley had charted the other
games State had played in the tournament.
State, in its game
with West Terre Haute, Chart 14, a comparatively weak team,
had made eleven of its eighteen field goals from under the
basket.
Mascari had made six of his seven field goals from
the right side close under the basket.
seventeen of the
si~ty-three
Mascari had taken
shots of his team.
In Statefs
game with Otter Creek, Ohart 15, page 51, they made thirteen
baskets and ten of these were close shots.
Mascari made four
baskets, and two of them were close and again to the right
aide..
He took twenty of State' s seyenty shots. and thirteen
"'\'
of them were
",
clo~e
ones.
flO
r'.-"'--- .....-..-.__...... ----------""""1
1
Shots taken
State
, - - - - - - - .. -
63
.. - - . - -. . . -
Shots made
--'~--.-~Taken-17
Taken
18
Taken
7
Ml.\de
Mascari
14 Smith
x
•
---"3'-l
2
x·
16
1
%
8
o
•Made
•
x.
•
•• •
x
•
• •
I
. -----+--~~----,-+-_---I--------.-Shots taken
West Terre Haute
hken
40
Shots made
_
6
6
1
4
Mette
:la
•
-L...
....L...'
.-L.
I
I
Taken' 10
Made
2
13 Reintjes 19
. Taken
Owen
•••
...... .---....
0--
Made
-_.~.
• •
... -
u
•
f
!
~ - ---..---+--~--,-,--i-----+._--__+_---
.
..._=- - . . . . . - . . - - _... __.
CR.ART 14
STAT:f!t ,:vERSUS' WEST TERRE HAUTE. :.~H V.4.LL~, 195p,
01
f' _
--...··
----.--
state
------------=-----.-.
. --.-.-- ".. First half Second half Totall
-----....,...--_.
_.
Taken
__
Made
Grah
•
•
•
1
10
12 .
8
4 Made
2 Made
a
15 !~_~Ison 21 Reint es 19
~.:.
. ~ . '.
.'
x
------+----+-----+---------1
Taken
Made
Cooke
"I
~aken
de
0
3 Smith
0
16
•
•
•
9
0
22
Taken
Made
Tabott
1
1
20
Taken
Made
Bock
-0 "
I
0
31
•
•
Taken
M$.de
Number
33
_-----.------,.-------1 Taken
4 Taken
:::
••
I
Shots taken
Shots made
..
20 Taken
4 Made
14 Owen
•
•
•
2
0
18
•
•
I
1-----+-----+------.:.+---+---J--------JI...-----...-I.--------I.-------'------First half l:iecond half Total
1
Shots taken
Shots made
'3 ~aken
o Made
'1 Black
Otter Creek
14
4
Q.
12
12
~aken
3
Made
0
Williams 9
• •
•
~aken
l)•
· (]
•
•
•
•
'0
lMa~e11
i
;
I
I
I
8
3
Made
.tI
3
8
1
-r----f
•
"
•
Taken
Made
Shestock
i '-.--+--.
•
•
56
•
•
•
•
•
•
u
•
o
x
~.- --_._---+--
.
--------+------1
ClIART 10
STATE·VERSUS OTTER CREEK
W~SHVJl+;LEY •. 193'1)
62
From these charts Wiley decided to use a defense in
which four Wiley men would guard five State men as long as
these State men stayed out on the floor.
~ll
Julian, Wiley's
center, was placed under the basket to stop any State
player who might try to score from under the basket, and
Mascari in particular.
The rest of the team were given man
to man guarding assignments and instructed to leave their
man and bother Mascari in case he started to shoot long
shots out on the floor.
The shot charts showed that he
would not hit enough of his long shots to win the game.
In
the game, Mascari scored three field goals, two of them by
dodging Julian under the basket, and the rest of the State
team scored three more.
Wiley won the game by a score of 33
to 16, Chart 16.
In the Sectionals, Wiley again played State and used
the same style of defense.
Wiley won by a score of 21 to
16. holding Mascari to three field goals, two of which were
long shots, Chart 17. page 54.
These games with State showed a defense set up as a
result of scouting charts shoWing the opponents to be good
nshats" under the basket, but poor ones on long shots.
The
defense was set up to stop one star player, Mascari; and it
not only stopped Mascari but the whole team as well.
Wiley~s
game with Glenn in
t~e
finals of the Wabash
Valley Prelim1na~ies of the 1935-1936 season was another ex-
r·----······-··--- ··---------F-1....,~.s,...t
... h~lf-w-s-e-c·o~~ohaif·T~4t~1
Wiley
--_.
Shots taken
2
~
Shots
made
.... .
-_.--..7 Taken
6 ,Taken
9 Taken
2 Made
2 Made
3 Made
__
Taken
4 Made
IMade
McLau,.h11n94 Climer
16
Taken
r
/
Kall!
~ ~~g?
0'X' x"g x' )•
• •
•
••
• •
x •
• •
Taken
Made
93 Ladson
1
1
,T"ken
tMade
Madigan
6
0
99
"0"
I ~
I
•
I
State
I
Taken
12
3
~de
;Mascari
14
II
)
'(r
•
••
!iaken
Made
Groh
•
)
\.-
•
• ••
%
~8lten
"de
~o
1
r~nux~~
!raken
3
1
\'OOO~8eyg1
••
•
-..
uI 0
! I.
0
.Smith
•
I.. · '.
~-'-----
•
--
First half Second half Total
Shots taken
24
18
42
Shots made
6 .
£; l2aken
1 faken
fJ ~aken
7
- 0
1 IDrade
0 Made
1 ~de
15 lFerguson 21 Cooke
22 geint es 19
x
•x
•
•
II
•
(-)
••
I!
)
'--
(
•
.
••
•
•
!
U
••
•
••
---
.,
2
0
Me de
.
-~_
---'--t-
I
I
•
•
x
,
15
i
96
J'
l
16
, I,
(~
•
U
(~
J
I
U
,
.
.L::_._....:':
I
•...
CRAR!f lUi
WILEY VERSUSa!CATE.,
W~ VALLEY•. 1950
:
b4
r' . _.....-.. . . . . .
4~
_
•.•
_~_.----
x
__
'-----.,.._. __.
10 Taken
•
Taken
•
•
T'aken
M$de
21 Climer
2
0
'Made
Ladson
Totali
26
40
•
•
3
1
26
6
2
Taken
Made
3
1
x • •
•
x
,
U
•
•
I
1--_.-+--_.-r------i-'-----1----L.....
-l-
1
Taken
t
8
Mascari
3
14
-..I
Taken
Made
Owen
!
• •
•
i
I
~'
•
••
_______-'-
I
lJ ')
x
,
x
x
()
'_
' ._ _.-+-
_
First half Second half Tots
Shots taken
9
20
11
Shots made
"1
4 Taken
4 Taken
1 Taken
3
o Made
2 Made
1 Made
1
16 Cooke
13 Heint.1es 19 Groh
2:2
State
I Made
J
~1!30 O~dr~JY24
..
•
.-.
"1 ~
._-,.-----_.".
Taken
Made
"1
.1
•
•
_.--_.~
Second half
Wiley
Taken
'-_._. __ ._..
._-----.-.--
U
"----_+
.__+-
....__
(J
~
..._
U
,----~
CHART 1'1
WILEY VERSUS STAB
SECTI01lTALS •. 1930
•
I
I
i
L-.._,_... _-'
56
ample of the charts showing that the weakness of the team
was due to erea shooting, Charts 1.8 and 19, pages 56 and 57,
respectively.
Glenn had a good team, having won most of
their games during the season.
Their players were tall and
the charts showed that their offense consisted of good passing with a pass to a man breaking under the basket for
in" shots.
I' close
Shot charts showed that Hendrix, their big cen-
ter, could not or would not shoot long shots, but tried to
get all of his shots under the basket.
On defense Julian
was again placed under the basket to stop anyone coming under.
HendriX was floated, that is, no one guarded him.
This
defense stopped Glenn completely under the basket, prOViding
the Winning margin in the game.
to 23, Chart 20, page 58.
Wiley won by a score of 26
Hendrix, without anyone to guard
him, took nine shots and made only
one~
. Scouting charts of Spencer showed that Money very
seldom shot and could not hit if he did shoot.
Wiley had
scouting charts of Spencer in the Wabash Valley Finals, and
in the final game of the Sectionals of the 1935-1936 season,
Charts 21, 22, 23,
p~ges
59, 60, 61, respectively.
In the
three games Money shot eleven times and made only one basket.
In the Wiley-Spencer game in the Regionals of 1936,
Julian played under the basket; and Money was floated.
made one ·field goal out of ten shots.
a Bcore of
34
to 27.
He
Wiley won the game by
b6
,-----.,.......-_.
20 Taken
~aken
Made
2
__ . -
2
Made
0
Shots
made
.,
17 faken
Made
:3
~:;8:~lO ~~~~,~
--_._-11
2
Evan
7
Taken
:3 Made
~aken
Made
9 '
-6
0
~~_;l smit~, ~-
11
4
J
I
•
I
j
,I"I
i
i
j
I
2
Taken
0
'Made
H.rringtQn'1
I!
'1
I
i
'j
1
I
--
I
-
_
-
-
-
-----I~---..:.--+-------I---_._--
2
1
3
faken
2
Made
0
McAllister6
Taken
4:
Made
0
ICe11e,ns 12
II
'[)
~'
-U
0,
!
-
'1
x
-
Taken
Made
Ketner
b
•
_
,....s..
-
I
--_._~"
--I.
...l--
_
First half Seoond half Total
Shots taken
27
35
60
Shots made
8
B
16
4 Taken 13 Taken
4 ~aken
8 Taken
11
1 Made
0 Made
1 Made
3 !.fa,,-e
2
7 MeQa1n
6 Hendrix
6 Smith
4: Haynes
3
Glenn
j
~
Ifaken
.•Made
'Dicke
.
'0-'
x
.
~aken
~a.~
"
Le.ach
I'
I
I
t
:
.- .
9
1
10
taken
lIade
Biens
3
p Made
11, Roesoh
It.
0
~aken
•-
k--_._~--+---"---
rl
ti
3
9
xU
-
- J-I.
-
l)
..
WEST TEBBE ErA'tI!.E.~Ua GLEP
1f,OJ.aR, V~LEY, ,1936
If
·
UI
•
I
CHART 18
"
---
1laken
3
Made
0
Buttvin 8
j
:
__ _-·•,•
.
....
~
b7
-_._._- -··_..·.-·A·._._
f'''------''·· ....,.--:--.,-_....-._- ,.-------..-..--.
First balf Second half
Shots taken
27
30
Glenn
Shots
made
6
11
..... -.--..-.._.. ...-......-_._-.,...4 Taken
9 Taken
8 ~aken
0
3 Made
1 Made
2 Made
0
,----..,...
67 J
16 ~
--~ ..
~ S~th
•
Totali
4
~:~~~~ x ~:~_?
6
•
•x
x
•
•
x
•
•
,----01--------+--------+---------
1 Taken
3
o Made
1
8 Roesch
9
Taken
Made
;Leach
,.
•
7
1
5
2
10
11
2
1
12
•x
U •••
•
iTaken
Made
Rein
•
I
--_.-t-•
._-----------
Gerstmeyer
Shots taken
Shots made
~aken
6
1
66
•
Made
Bartett
.~:
•
•
•
•
First half Second half
10
1
77
(·f
'-
••
•
48
9
6
0
. 2.2
'0•
o
I
I
~Ot8
7
~aken
19 Taken
Made
4 Made
Sullivan 44 Pruett
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
I
23
26
2
•
f
H-"'""--,;...------------"-------_.........
-~-._.-:--~-----._-+----'-----j------i
----_._--_._•..._.
ClUB! 19
G.Umi,~y~,f}~mtB~
','~~I.:V.lJ4~1'. 19$~
,.
:,'.,'
"',-",
"
l,.
','
,",
rt........-........-... " ...
~a..o..-.~
__.
.•..
~-.
---."
-Taken
9
3
Made
Aldrid "8 11
x
~aken
I
4 Made
'1
, ~mith
·,0
. --
.•. _~~._.-
.
26
'1
~-_._---
Taken
Made
2
.....
.(
~x
•• •
..
.. -
6
Tota1f'
64
. 12..... '
__
10 Taken
3 Made
6
0
-
•
•
•
•
-. .
•
•
• x
•
-
---
0
6
U 0
---t
"
! I,
..
0
,
-
Taken
__ __.._
~qJl.IY12 n;Ls~weZl~
McLa't"l"'~
~
0 JJ
Made
._.
28
16,
•
1
'Made
Vogel
_ ,,-_._
Taken
14
Julian
,
•
_.~_
Taken
J
-
Shots taken
. Shots
.. ..... made ..
Mad.$
IX
•
-
First half Second half
Wiley
.
..-
----~
68
---
First half Second half Total
Glenn
61lots taken
23
12
35
,6
s'hots made
3
3
10 Taken
Taken
8 Taken
9 Taken
1
1 Made
0 Made
4 Made
0
1 Made
4 l[eCfiin
3 Leach
5 H~ndrix
6 Raynes
10
' I
.
•
x ]·1
J,
."
- ,-,
• 1"
• ~
·x
••
)
-
•
- • Ixl .-(-'- ).-
x
l)~
U
x• -
-- I,
.
,
II,
0
(~
~.. .. ~-"
_._----. ..
..
---,
I
f
I
I
•
(~
1,
U
.
I
".,'
OHART
so
'.W;I~T ~~, Q:f.JlNN
VAI"L!}Y., 1936
W~AeH
0
f
I•
._ _-.i
.....
09
'.._.-.f
··
. --------
-~_._._--
_Taken_._-_
SP encer
....
12
faken
Made
4
Griffith 5
•
•
•
O·X
XX
•
.
,
---
~de'
Johnson
'1
-._-
scot
·1S· w
•
•
x
~~~
••• x • •
X
•
•
._.__
- .. ,.._;._.
._~.---
Tota~
First'half Second half
Shots taken
32
25
Shots
made
6 .....
8
..
9 Taken,
8 Taken
19 1'aken
3 Made
2- Made
3 Made
•
•
••
••
x
0
x
•
~~
·
14
---~
4
MOT0
•
•
'~
Taken
f Made
Sink
I
I
3
2
6
-
Taken
Made
Gibson
--
2
0
1
.U 0:
I
U 0
--_.-+-.I
X
! I.
0
I
,
Midland
I
IMade
faken
I Hal'S
...~:
3
Taken
Made
0
~tone
17
•
()
I
•
f·
•
,t
•,
J
u·
,
I
(~
I!
U
____'_
qltU~
_..
21
Sl'E1{fJ~~a~,M:J::Q~
WAJM.f;iJ3; ,.Y~~t ,193~
·
0
'
~:__ Z
4·
I
()
t
(~)
• • ~)
.
.
II.
f
~ .,~
rl
---
Taken
1
Made
1
IVistlls:rv 10
t
I
•
•
•
--
First half' Second half Total
Shots taken
18
18
36
~hots made
1
4
5
4 Taken
4 Taken
3
." Taken
0 Made
0 Made
1 Made
0
12 Barnes
11 Bales
9 TruatJ
8
I !I
• •
-
J
~--._.,
-
,
:
I
.. ....·
_---_ _._---.--.-...
60
_
__
._.. ... _......_.Firat ha1~ Second half Tota~
I
Spencer
Shots taken
23
36
68 I
Shots made
4
3
'1
I-----~·_-- _._--., ._--.
---.----r------Taken
10 Taken 16 Taken
'1 Taken
19 Taken
6
Made
0 Made
3 Made
1 Made
2 Made
I
,.-....... -
..
..... "':'
r
_~_._,-_.-
..
.......
~_...
Gr1f~~~. ~ ~~~.~ se~t~:-~ ~?g ~ ~01r-
.---
-
-
. -.
.
•
x•
•
•
1-------1--------1I----------I-------J------.----
,Taken
1 Taken
1
:Made
0 Made
;'0
Sink
6 Gibeon
1
J..=.:=~....----=.+--::.::.::.=.;:.:T_-=_+---r-r--_+--.,..,..--f--.,..,---
I
II
U 10
O· 0
0
I
\--'- ---1---.;....---+-------_.-+---+----
J------J...-
Aahboro
I
II Made
Taken
I
._J...-
Wellnin:r
•
12
Taken
Made
12 Hauser
..
1
:zt:
-•
-I ,
-
-'--
_
First half Second half Total
Shots taken
38
26
64
~hota made
4
Ii
9.
13 Taken
7 Te.ken
20 Taken
12
3 Made
0 Made
1 Made
,., Hopkins 11 Nicosen 44
9 Tille:.v
-.
-~).
.l-lx
-)
.:
._ _._..l.!
•
X
••
•
'-I . ..
I ••
(.
, .. )
•
•
-• •
tl-' (~,
I
tlx-x
X
,1.'
•-
(j
I.
•
•
-
-- ...,
II
,
I
0
f
I
!•
OIrART 22
~P]!;liQnVEasU8 'ASHBORO
wUuSli Y~IaEl'. 1936
.
•,
i
61
f'·"-"--·-
,:.~_
..•_.-
. . .-..Tota~
. . . .-:.-
---.. ----.. .
~
._--------->~-~---,_.-_
First' half Seoond he1f
Spencer
Shots taken
22
23
Shots
made
5
11
.
- .. -....
--_. -----_ ..............
-~-13 Taken
Taken
2 Taken
6 Taken
12 Taken
Made
'1 Made
2 Made
4 Made
0 Made
0 Money
4
2 Johnson
Oole'
S Soott
_. '-'---"
--_.
-----Tf-x •
:[fo ::XO:o
..
& (S-
x •
x • x
. Taken
'Made
S.ink
6
.
I: Made
Taken
I
I
6
Taken
0 Made
\ H'allser
9 filley
0{5'
•
Iltla«.
taken
X-e f:*. ·
• (X)- .
II·
l)
•
._---
!
•
.·XX·
".
•
IL
-(~)
!
x·U·••
•
•
._~,
-
1
61
i Hom
.
I
-
8'
f
!I
I\,
()
()
----
~- -._--_ ..
..
----_.-4-. -
Flrstha1f Second halt' TotaJ
Shots taken
18
28
46
S,hots made
5
3
8
3: faken
16
1 ~aken
20 Taken
0 Made
0 Made
2
6 Made
'1 1i1ooson
4 Wenning 12 Hopkins 11
•
• -I4
.. : J x: •
Ashboro
I
-
0
0 U 0
.'
f
•
_.
_.
•
•
---
t
!!
e/·x· •
• •x·
.
•
• x
I
I
Gr1r2
1
I
I
.-----
---
1
OX
I
t!
~o'
16'
11
.__
I
J
t
l)
I
U
...--
-
I
.
...~_":"""':"'.Ioo-o-_-
CHART
as
SPENCER VERSUS ASRBORO
SEe.TIO~S. 1936
~
- j-
I
I
I
_._ _.....
I
I
t
,
62
Charts for Oblong in the 1936 Wabash Valley Finals
showed all the men on the team to be dangerous offensively,
Charts 24, 26, and 26, pages 63, 64, and 66, respeotively.
Wiley played them man to man on defense, plaoing the best
guard, Vogel, on Shipman, Oblong's best shooter.
Vogel held
Shipman sooreless, allowing him but five shots.
Wiley's offense oonsisted of passes to Julian on the
pivot line who either shot or passed to a player driving for
the basket.
Oblong's ooaoh, having scouted Wiley thorough-
ly, set up a defense in whioh he plaoed one of his tall men
to one side behind Julian, and plaoed another on the opposite side in front of Julian.
intercepted passes to him.
Julian who
~ot
They blocked his shots and
This defense completely stopped
only seven shots without scoring; and orip-
pled the Wiley team so much that offensively they were far
outpla.yed by Oblong and lost the ga.me by a score of 29 to 24.
By
stopp~ng
Julian's playing in the pivot area, Oblongoom-
plete1y demoralized the Wiley team, Chart 27, page 66.
Wiley game charts showed that the players guarded by
Woodrow Wey and
Voge~
ones that were taken.
got few shots and made very few of the
As a result in games they were placed
on the, best "shots" on the opposing teams.
In the Mitohell
gam_, Wey guarded Ramey, who had averaged over ten points
I
per g$me.
Wey held Ra1Dey scoreless :until Way went out of the
.
game on perSonttls.with four minutes left in the game, Chart
,
~.
63
-----.-.
.
Taken
4 Taken
Made
1 Made
Mikeworth55 Sprowl
•
~
21
6
66
...
.x
.~
X~:l
:
x.
.
••
Taken
Made
9 Taken
Made
.
-
1
0
'(
10 Ta.ken
2 Ma!de
2
•
•
Taken
f Made,
Wood
_
R..' ;Staaj 33 :'t
S~ots made
6 . _- ---..-- ---.
..:..-.. ...-. _- ,..--
99
x x •
••
•
•
.
•
•
•
•
--
-
44
!I.--
0
I
I
I
I
-
~
ShT. , .
o' 0 u 0
I
12
11
2
_ _ OM
--~'--j-
--
t
First half Second half Total
Sullivan
Shots
taken
19
31
60
I
Shots made
2
I
6
8
'(
18
Taken
4 Taken
16 Taken
6 i'e.ken
I~aken
Made
3 Made
1 Made
2 Made
0 Made
2
~~il1er
11 1ie.rris 10 A~k1nson 19 Huff
17 Bradbury20
,Ml'
••
••
ixt •
• x.
•
.(1)
x:
• •• ••
,I
))
\,--
.I~ tXt ··
(. )·:x
..-.
•
• •
•
••
~L1
·
(j
•
•
•
.•i,
.
I
,
i
I
t
!
l
II
U
(~)
I
\~._-_._~",
'
.
J~
1 I
--_.
()
UI
i
('-
I
,
;
..
.- .
CRAR!r24
.():eLQNG . ~us .Sur.;PIVJ,N
WJj)~I{ V~LEY •. tL936
1
._ --.
I
.....
64
. -------
r·_~-_M':-_'_---
Oblong
J.-------,..---..
Taken
First bi£ Seoondh""8if-T-ot;;l' ;'
Shots taken
18
29
4~
.
10
18 ~
Shots made
8
_ ..
7 Taken
6 Taken
9 Taken
11
3 Made
3 Made
4 Made
4
as 99 ShlP~ 11.
~6 R.
3~ 9..!_;g.a
xX ,•
• x.
~
•
_.~-_..
x
•
_ _ _
'X
Taken
Imnel
_ _ ow·
n
,
'Made
•
'
•
----of---------+-------t-------..1
2
0
77
o
•
•
I
J.------I-----+----.-+---r---......--
1--------'-------'-------""'"------""------Firat half Second half Total
Cloverdale
Shots
taken
19
16
36
I
~hota made
6
2
8
I
Taken
8 Taken
12 Taken
6 Taken
4
1 Taken
6 Made
2 Made
0 Made
0 Made
1
IMB.de
'~oll
4 Cook
8 Folt,z
9 Meek
'1 Duncan
10
I
•,
• ,X
) -'"'x·
x
,,
\
- ), "
•,
,I,
('0)
J".)
('-.
U·
,
r.:,T~a-:k-e-n---4-+------+------+------.--,f------·0
~D
1
0
I. .
:
•
ft
t
!
f
u
•
•
•
.~ - --._._-.,.-'t - - - - - - . - , - t - -
----1-
CJU,RT 25
OaJ;.QJfG"lERSV;S . CLQ~.ALE
- W;4B~ TAI.ItEY. ,1936 .
6b
r·------------.. - _.. _.- _'"'- -----...--------."---.----,.-.. . -." "..,
-.~
",
Oblong
._
....
9 Taken
2 Made
First .half Second half
Shots taken
29
16
Shots
made
8
6
....
10 Taken
8 Taken
10 1'aken
2 Made
Made
2 Made
3
_-_
Tak;Em
Mad.e
MikeworthQ6 Sprowl
66
S·· .0
•
•
•
--
1 Taken
0 :Made
-
Ashboro
Taken
18 Taken
'Made'
3 ~de
INioosen 4 lHopkine
.0····
. -
• ••
•
x •
•
•
x·
·x·
~aken
1IT"_~'
.I
I
I,
•
" ,r
.(j
.
•
• •
x
--_.
-
·If'
()
• •
•
U
0
I
--_.--+-..
! I.
0
---
I
First half Second half Tota]
Shots taken
20
31
fll
Shots ttlade
3
6
9
f)
16 Taken
6 Taken
6 T$ken
2 Made
1 Made
1
1 Made
9 Wenn1ny . 12
11 Tilley
7 H$.user
IK
••
x I I, •
•
- (-.)
-
~
.
'-
•
•
•
O·
•
._-
.•,
II.
()
x
·
••
x
A
~-------.
:,
•
••
_
2
1
Mad
\
•
_~_,t~99 Sh1~
33
IXI
x
461
1,4 •
4
3
1],_,
---
Taken
1
1
1 Made
77 Clayton 13
44 Imne1
•
... ~x
2
0 .0
I•
R. H~ea
-
•
Taken
'Made
Wood
----
TotaJi
"
'"
..
,
----
(~
U
U I,
,
I
-
-
C~!r 26
O~+'()BG .~l1S ASJ:ll3QRO
'~:e:V~~T~1:93$ '"
.
-I
---
!
66
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
~~1A.t:.Q.f1JLJifi~tuaJ:.(lJltL~~Ji11a.rJ1e..a~4~a.I:.t1W1....JJJ~JiU~1Sd-J..l.."
1
o
'/)
Taken
1
Made
0
j
WilsonWe 14
'
f-"-"""""~-+---"'~----'---r-T""'-+-----,-,~--t--r-r--·l
0
I ·
I
•
i
Guarded
f.
66
I Guarded
Oblong
I
Taken
8
I Made
6
1M1lq:tworthti
• •
Taken
Made
~proW1
• ,x 41
l,:::.l.l--
I
I
I
----.--t-
~_ _ •
......,j
_
First half Second half Total
Shots taken
26
11
37
Shots made
6
6
12
10 !Daken
rz Taken
rz Taken
fi
6 Made
2
66 R. aayes. 33
.~.
!
.,..05
()
..x
•
Made
0
c. Hayes 99
----rr•
u
I
I
t!
,----_......_------_."._WI~
•
0
Shipman 11
•
•
o
f
~ - ---.--.",;.-t-----,-,--+------+
e~
.()':
Made
••
I
j
I
-:::::::::.~l:. :_.-_----..-_.~i
27
VERSUS OBLONG
'IlJJ3~HV~LEY. 1936
p7
28, page 68.
.
Ramey got several shots, but they were so hur-
ried that he did not make them.
The substitute guards could
not hold Ramey; and he beat Wiley, 26 to 2h, by scoring four
field goals in the remaining four minutes.
Honey Creek had Dale Royer, a high Soorer in every
game.
Vogel guarded him and held him to two field goals,
although he let him get eighteen Shots, Chart 29, page 69.
Wiley won the game by a score of 41 to 29.
Vogel's guard-
ing of Royer was the deciding factor in the game.
Shot charts taken for the coach, when he oould not
scout the game himself, revealed the expert shooters and
gave the ooaoh a oomparison of his team with that of the
opponent.
Wiley's game oharts for the season of 1936-1937 showed the guards to be weak shooters.
a field goal.
~hey
seldom scored over
Bowsher's average for the year was less than
one field goal per game, Table II, page 14.
Forsyth's aver-
age was also less than one field goal per game,
p~ge
16.
the Whole
Thi~
~able
III,
guard weakness offensively worried the ooaoh
$e~eQ~.
No opponent took advantage of it until
Wile1 played Martinsville in the regional game.
Curtis, the
coach of MartinSVille, floated one guard all of the time,
and both oftbem part
o~
the time; so that be was able to
.use two men, in guarding the Wiley :t:orwards. MoLaughlin and
Aldridge, any ti~e they had the ball.
MartinsTille won the
68
r"'---" ~~i~~·- "'-~~ot~~:C':Flrs~~~lf - se~on~~haif""'-'TO~:1
,.6 ..-_._
6
12 '
""-.__ _.- Shots
- ..... made
---------_
_-.
~aken
4 Made
Taken
17
Made
17
3
9
Taken
3
Made
•
x
•
..
....
.~
Taken
x· · x.·.·
• •
•
.---.,.,._..
Made:
• •
x
_.-~)'-:- '---'X6~ .(
·
__
......
7
2.
Taken
?
Made
Vo
0
6
•
•
••
•
•
~::.;.::·u::::a::r.::r:..:d:.;e.;:d__9--.-G=--U!lrds;ed~14.!:4.!lJd,'~IoISIJ.I..-..Ir..'IY-~Ia..-'J~"""".:i4-¥Llo&Arda.d....4....7_.
Taken
1 Taken
de
0
'I
...H_e_B_B_.,...._4-+-W_i_1_s_o.,.n..,W._e...::y:..1_4-t-_ _.....,.._ _~ .-..,...,---t----,...,...--..
i
0
'Made
I
U
0
I
. - -+----t--------.-+-.--+--...-.:===-=.
:......f,,;:=-=:.s.:~_~;
Mitchell
Taken
: Made
IS~ith
7
2.
Taken
.....J._._ _.
..
First half Seoond half
Shots taken
36
32
Sh ts made
2
7
1 Taken
24 Taken
14 Taken
Made
12 .~anks1e
0 Made
? Rame
4
3
Made
. . .-. . .:x~~,..;,..-+--~~ll.;;;,!.;;.tj)
..
~~";;;;';;;;;;.i;.a,~,.... . . . .·-:-:;;;...~'--=Jr)..
•
•
, Taken
}Je.de .
•.
•
f::~
•
Taken
1 Made
2. Taken
10
o
6
o
Made
,I
..
,r'-.__..;.....__.. -'-;'.-_.-_._._._..
-----......_--_
;l
•
f
_-......
.oHART
28
WILEY VERSUS MITOHELL
._ .J.ANP'~Y
11.. 19~6'
';;
6
U
x·
:
._~
I
,I
-l.
--_.__._- ----_ 1 _ ',;
. -----.....
...~'_._"--
",,' '.
6
o
C)
•
•
68
9
.., I··
(x·
, - . _ " . '•
•
•• •
Tota
3 Made
9 Burton
York
_
',.
69
'.
r----- ....
··--------·--F-i-rs-t---hai·f--S-eco~d
-h~i-f·-T·qt_;1i.
--0. .. - - - -
_._- ._._----.....- __._-- ._--_
Wiley
\._------,..----
14 Taken
2 Made
Taken
Made
Al~r1d
Shots taken
Shots made
24 Taken
6 Made
~l M:~U hl:~
e
Q
Jul~~_
34
30
64 I
12
6
17......
.
Taken
Made
6
2
Taken
Made
8
b
7 W..Q.Q1tJ:
8
1
'
•
x
•
•
Guarded
Taken
Made
Colwell
4.6
b
J--
-Io-G..;.u~8...;;;r..;;;ci..;.e.;;;...d·
--L.
..
Honey Creek
!aken
18 Taken
2 Made
3 Baile
I Made
I D. Ho er
•
•
•
x
x
Guarded 7 8
Taken
1
Made
0
Hess
4:
12
3
1
3
Guarde~ __
..!t _
I
0
I
12 t"Guarded
8
_
First half Second half Tota
Shots taken
24
31
66
Shots made
4
4
8
6 Taken
6 1 aken
2 Taken
22
3 Made
0 Made
0 Made
3
7 Ditto
12 Farmer 10 Coo er
6
l
•
• x
•
faken
•
•
••
. 1
Made
Eaton
... ',
(0
2.
OJ!
0
8
4
(J
~. - ---.--~-_t__--_. __.,+____--+
.U
._-----------_...-.__
.,
...,
70
game by a soore of 48 to 16.
not soore until the
MoLaughlin and Aldridge did
I~rtinsvi11e
substitutes oame into the
game during the seoond half, Chart 12, page 37.
Realizing that Garfield was always the team to be
feared in the Seotionals, Wiley scouted the Garfield team
every game possible.
During the season of 1936 w 1937, seven
of Garfield's games were charted, Charts 30, 31, 32, 33, 34,
and 36, pages 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, and 76, respectively.
They showed Garfield taking an average of forty-eight and
four-sevenths shots and making an average of ten and sixsevenths shots.
Against Wiley on January 1, 1937, Table V,
pa,ges 30 and 31, they took thirty-seven shots and made seven.
Comparing their average with the Wiley average of fifty-nine
shots taken and twelve and one-fourth shots made, Wiley was
always offensively nearly three points better than Garfield.
Fontanet beat Garfield in the Sectiona1s, and Wiley beat
Fontanet by a soore of 36 to 12.
Comparing the shots taken and made by opponents, gave
a oomparison of Garfield and Wiley defensively.
The average
of the opponents of Garfield for seven games charted was forty-seven and six-sevenths shots taken per game, with nine and
two!!"s8venths shots made.
'f
The average of the opponents of Wi-
ley was forty-seven and three-one-hundredths shots taken, and
a1ght and Que-fourth shots made, TSQle V, pages 30 and 31.
Defensively Wiley was one basket ,better than Garfield.
Add-
71
r'
-_· -
~_. 1_'•• ... ~••..• - - - . - - - - -..- - - - .-----.------~--- -_
~arfield
lif,T'alten- ---'2'"
Q Made
1
.~6: Menen
•
:8
.. 10
Tak;~
, .,..
-
Total
'j'
43
10
Tai;~~~ ~ake~-'
3 Made·
3 Made
Made
16 "
_·Z··
0
pa~~~~7 ~tl~~~!: Bake~ ~~
xx
•
- - -.........- - - ---t--
4
_
.
First half Second half
Shots taken
19
24
Shots made
8
8
•••
.-----1-----.----,.
4
,
I
~-,-......-5......6+------,.~-......----.,1~-~ ---.....,......-~_,.I_.__--·I
......
()
x
0
I
0
I
1---------1--.---------1--,.-.--..- .--t-.-----+----.
Mishawaka
taken
14 T'aken
••_ " " " " __ _ •
~_,.........L.._..
First half Second half Total
Shots taken
20
28
48
~hots made
7
4
11
Taken
2 Taken
6 Taken
5
lI/fade
0 Made
t-..;.,;,,;.;;:.;;r.;;~~~~=.:;..;.;:;:;.._-=.=:~a;:.:.o::.;b:.:1::.:;Sr.:o;;::;I,l:..-9;:;.:.9:_p1{1nkluk
I.
••
• •
_
1 Made
1
77 .-;-N'_o_r_r-ri_s,..-4_4_
._~_.,
x
.'-- ').
(... ")
· U·
(
'-
•
•
, ••
t--------+-------+-------f-.-~-.-.--___tr_-------~
h"-----+--------"""O'+~-_I____--___I__-
-'-1
0 - - '
1
~
:
~~~~____r__.____J..__,....,.__..__I____..,_r_..
,
I
!
J
(j
f
•
!
I
(.)
();
f
f.. -._..... '---"-'-1--,--,--,--,
1
j'
_. _
.
·-------+-1--------!
..... __ .....
..... _.:,
•• . I
.••'.
C~T
30
GARFIEL:l)VImSU~~SRAW.w
... JJEO~:;.29, '1936
.
72
t
_
.--..·
r
,
_,:_
'.
Made
2:
.. ~l
Price
x
•
•
x
•
MehsB
:6:
.. _...
_ _._
.......
~aken
••
"'~.,'
..~-_._,,_
x •.
Tota~
63'
10 '
6
-~-_.,-~.
PBUll1:99 :_:~§B
•••
'Z,2
0
~B~e~
,33
•
-------r---.
. . .- ------t--- '----;---------..,
Taken
1 Taken
4
I
I
Made
i
Made
456 Tuttle
0
Freed
I
t
_..II
0
13
•
"
I
II
·
I
0
I
OU
I
i
•
~
.. •.••.. "",
Made
,----~
10
_
..
F1rsthalf Second half
Shots taken
26
38
Shots
made
3
7
....
._-_._-..--.._.
..-....
33 Taken
6 Taken
4 Taken
3 Made
3 ~de
2 Me. de
Qarfield
~aken
~-.-..~---~._.
- - . _ _._ _
I
'-------+-------t---··---·-·-+-'---.--t----04--...0--__
f•
66 Wood
~aken
2 Made
•
-----J-.
.---'-_ _ ..
_
First half Second half Tote.
Shots taken
17
17
34
Shots made
4
b
9
44 Clayton 13 Shipman 11 vVaters
77
4 ~e.ken
6
9:'aken
2
1 Taken
3 Made.
de
0
1 Made
1
Oblong
14
,.....s.-.
!
t)
jX
x·
I
()
I.
·
•
t-----+-----+---,.~.-..-.
-I
U
._--+_x__.
·
--+-_.
I
h.-.::::::="'i"''---wi5~=''-::-:=--'""?n'r-+-----+------+-----·-i
i
,
i
rx---.-.;.r-r-.....,;.r;;.;;:.;-r-,...~~..:.-..-;;...:.c,.....,..--f-----r..,.....---J---r-r--l
i·· •
i
,
i
U
. . ... _.-_.- _._-
+:.~.~
'.
"
I
~._--.-
l)
L)
I
i
j
_ . - -..-
.
CHART 31
G.AU:tE!lj)~v.mRSUS O~ONG
·'\iAmT.AR¥'
1:957, _
a,
4l
...L-.-...........- '.......,. --~
73
r---" ....
_._--~
.. '.-----'--- ,------------.-.--
_.--._.~~~
First half Second half Tota~
Shots taken
23'
29
ti2 ,f
Garfield
Shots
made
4
7
--1}..... - - - - ._._--..,.-.. ... - ...
Taken
5 Taken
11 Taken
19 Taken
7 Taken
3
Made
2 Made
1 Made
2 Made
1 Made
0
_-
,,------,..-_
BBke~
xP~~~8 .~1 ~a~!B~'·~ M:15:
3
~e~e~
6
:
•
..x.
•
88_
•
•
...------;--------If--------+------+-------Taken
4 Taken
ti
Made
4
Freed
66 Tuttle
13
~;;..;;,..;~~--.;.~....;.;..;...;.;;;~~;;;;;.,;;..-+--~....,..--+_--__r_r_-___i~-_r_r__--.;
, Made
1
1·'0'
.x
0 0 Q
0
I
J-----+---+
- - - - -,---...'_
- -_,
.-+- + - - - I_
...J-"'1....-_ _.
I--
--I.
'.
.
First half Second half Total
Shots taken
14
20
34
Shots made
3
4
7
8 Taken
7 Taken
6 Taken
4 Taken
4
2 !irade
1 Made
2 Made
0 Made
1
44 ~oger8 16 Grover
99 Dennie
33 Campbell 22
Gerstmeyer
It--------r------;;:;,;;.;;';O;-"':::-O=-----;-------;-------:.-.
Taken
I, Made
IBea1mer
'.
~I
~)
x
•
• •
•
Taken
JCade
A.1hiT
x
1
o
88
I
C~
I
".
Jlade
2
Walker
0
66
II
I
••
•
•
•
Taken
•
J,)
~ : :.
()
Xf'l
i'aken
Made
Miller
•
UJ.!
•
._~
.2
II
.
1
66
(~
.0
.I I
U
-
CHART, 3~
GARJ'IELD VB.BB,US GEB5TJIEYER
.JABU.ARYl.198'.
j
I
I,
f
~ - -~,._--+-_._---+------+-
I
I
j
_•.. - .
-i
74
-_
--_ _- .__
4 faken
11
-Taken
....
...
.
Mads'
Baker
......
...
0 Made
O·
2
0~'
11
• •
•
--
..
-....
..-
.
Made
PS":8
x '1'l
2
r
I
Taken
Made
6
x
•
• x
x
•
"
--
-----_..
!
0
13
......--.
II
0 0
U
------~
-_.......--. _----
..
..
First half
Shots taken
28
Shots made
4
Switz City
ITalcen
j lIfade
· Landis
19 Taken
3
3 !Made
1
77 IR- Allee 22
"x8 ·
..-- • ..- . .
(
.x
•
4
2
.~
x'
I
I
•
~aken
II
'l)
-lil
•
x
•
21
(.)
.
•
•
2
11
- ·jJ:·
•
•
Total
4
2 ~de
88 lRo!n
•••
x
•
_---
26
~aken
9
Made
Harper
Second half
I : •
I
\,-
).
• •
.
~aken
Made
Lundy
63
8
1
0
U
---
-
•
..
_•,I
I·
,
I
I
•
!
0
t,. -.__.. ~ .._..__.-
·
99
J!
II'
f
.
~_--..~_
-,J .
• •
0 0
I
....
14
~_1!'!~_§6_~1r88x -•
•
· Taken'
I Made
Tuttle
_--_
11 faken
2 :Made
~aken
33 Prioe
-
._~
f
I(~)r
.--_._._._..
It
))
l,
!l f
I
()
-
1---
.........._.
.--.
- ..-
CIURT 33"
GARFIELD VERSUS SWITZ QITY
. WAl\ASH"lt~LEY~193'1
J{
l)
i
I
I
I
I
r,
.,
,
1 ..:_- --.~._:.!
75
r·----····-·---- ..--------. .
:.B'irst ha-li-S;;;~nd-h;if-··;~tal t'
Garfield
Shots taken
22
27
49 ,
Shots
made
b
7
12
.... .. _---'
...--.,._.".........
--_.
..._-.. - - ... .. _. .
Taken
2 Taken
Taken
.10 ~aken
10 Taken
7
Made
o Made
Made
5 Made
0 Made
1
:Baker
-------,--_ _
•• 33
__
-
~
.. paUl??
Price
•
l?'~ii6
••
•
•
--_
_
Men:8
88
•
•
•
• x
••
----+-------+-------11---.-----.-..,
'1'aken
8 Taken
4 Taken
1
I
I Made
2 Made
2 wade
0
j
Freed
tic
~utt~e
13
Burke
44
~;;:..;;...;.;..-~~~--..;;;;..~~...;,......,_--t---..._r__-+_____,_..,..-_
..
•
I•
I.
U
x
I
I
l------+-------+------.-i------+-----
I·
x
J
.....t.
---iL....-
._--J,.i
_
~
First half Second half Total
Shots taken
32
29
61
Shots
de
7
4:
11
22 Taken
20 Taken
6 Taken
6
4 Made
6 Made
1 Made
o
4 gopkins 11 Tilley
7 Novel
6
• •%
• ).1 •-X.
]1;. x • Il~ • • • .
•
•
•
•
•
• .~)..
Coo) •
•
Ashboro
•
I···
.)
••
c-
x x
•
•
0
I,
..
,
i
i
. I
r
,
I!
I
'~ ~~_..
I
U
I
00_.'
u I
.-----t=__..
I
_~
_-+--
i.'
:
ClU,R[' 34
G~IE~DVImSU5
ASImORO
We-ASH VALLEY•.1937
":' .
,
'"
~
~'
. \.
76
r'··-~......-..·· . . ,.. ~~--
--- ..-------'-,-----------.----.-.--.--......,....-
Garfield
--_.
Taken
Made
Mehsi
fr'
.x' ,
• •
X·"
••
•
I
__
16
.
,~
,
'
2. Taken
0 Made
9
Burke
'0 ,0
,--
~r1Ir~~t11r14 ~lr• ••
•
x
. Taken
f Made
Fre.ed
I
22 Taken
8 Made
16 Baker
First half Second half TPtall'
Shots taken
31
18' ,
49' .
Shots
made
6- --_..
4
10
. ._.---6
I)
Taken
11 Taken
3 Taken
0 Made
1 Made
1 Made
0
•
•
•
•
•
--
1
0
10
-
._.
U 0
!
0
I
-_.---r.I .
I
--
t
Masonic
Taken
13
I Made
I
1
20
. 0"
-.'
Darrow
x,
•
(
•
First half Second half Total
I{ome
Shots taken
21
33
64
Shots made
0
9
9 .
Taken
8 Taken
8 Taken
6 Taken
9
Mada
3 Made
2 Made
0 Made.
2
Thompson 20 J.McCrory24 McClain 26 . Stewart 29
I !',x
• Ii
•
. .·1 !.
• C·)
I
~(:).
••
•
••
I.
(~)
•
•
•J! •
'x
'.
x
~
x •
Taken
Made
M.¥:cQron22 York
faken
Made
i
I
I, •
.
I
Taken
-1 Made'
21 Myers
,6
J.
0
0
~---_._-.. -
·IJ
(~"
'
_.
--
4
0
•,
I
:
23
· • II
. '0•
.
(~
•
-
.
'
CHART 36
GARFIBLDVERSUS MASONIC HOME
.FEBRUARY 13. 3.957
JI
U
1
I
I
I,
-_.. -
I
I
,
77
ing this two points advantage defensively to the three
points advantage offensively, gave Wiley a total of five
points advantage over Garfield.
By the scores of games Wi-
ley did not chart, the Wiley coach knew that there was even
more than five points difference in the ability of the two
teams.
By using the offensive and defensive rating, it was
possible to predict fairly accurately the results of games
before they were played.
Summary.
Scouting teams by using shot charts gave
Wiley definite information about the shooting ability of
opponent players; so that the ooach planned his defense and
offense to take advantage of this knowledge.
During the
three years that the Wiley coach used shot charts, this
knowledge helped win several games that would have been lost
without the aid of shot charts.
· i
.f
CHAPTER VI
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS,
RESEARCH PROBLEMS
AND FURTHER
.1.
SUMMARY
The study, extending over a period of three years,
showed the following:
1.
The questionnaire, with replies from over half of
the coaohes of Indiana, showed that approximately seven out
of eight coaches were using shot charts in some form as an
~id
in their coaching.
2.
The charting of pract'-oe scriJJlJIl8ges oompared· the
ability of the team members with one another offensively and
defensively; and showed their improvement in shooting and
guarding ability •
. 3.
The charting of games showed the indiVidual of-
fensive and defensive ability of players under game competion.
It enabled the coach to place responsibility on play-
ers for their own scoring. and for that of their guarded
opponent.
4.
8~owed
The keeping of a percentage table for each player
his improvement, as a result of coaching and playing
eXpel rience •
6.
ahowed his
The keePing of a cumulate.d ohart for each player
natura~ shooting area
au the floor. and the spot
79
or spots from where he hit a large percentage of his shots.
The coacll, used this knowledge in placing his men on the
team. and in planning his style of play.
6.
In scouting. shot charts of opponents gave the
coach definite information on the number of shots taken and
made by each player.
They showed the position on the floor
from where these shots were taken.
The charts also showed
the guarding ability of each player by showing the number of
shots he allowed his guarded opponent.
The coach used this
information in planning his style of play against them.
II.
CONCLUSIONS
The charting of shots of individual players in pracw
tice scrimmages and games will be a great aid to a coach in
coaching his team •
. The scouting of opponents. by charting their shots in
games. will be the margin of victory in several close games
.,f;
each year for a coach who uses shot charts.
Chart 36, page 80, is a usuable one that gives the
neces~ary
.
.,
a game.
information, that a coach needs to keep concerning
.
In this chart, the first two lineS are for team
statistios; and, as shown by the example, are self-explanatory.
Then there is an individual chart for each player,
'rep::resentinghalf of a basketball court with four lines
"
,
above. it for statistics.
The first line is a space for re-
80
Sc.oye
It/lll
IZ
Jj. /0
16 J1l4de
Q",~
/
~
0
a
.lOU' 1.1./ T!JytJw.s ~
? !t, e5'~/
~
/r ~ :f 1~ c.J 70 ,7 3 "170 " / 1 7 1% ~ ~ I ~ %
3 J .Il,? 0 1/
/ .~ 00 " ( ) 0 1 0 0 / 1 / 1.J~3 0 0 I 0 0
'11.bJ".(8v!;t'hJillJ& J21..1)l'iy;dae" III)~ }lay"!;
13 Sl~~ -rn, 11.;, ~ I 8o_.sA~>-~O
1 ,
o
. ..)) .~. ·~ .' · .~:
•
',~".
.
o
U,
0
I
)JJayt:;/17S
Scoye.13
l..
08 % Fy.~ J,I /s /1 /:
.JJ1~de.- 7 .~" II ;599 /8 3/0"'hro~~ ( )/ )3./'/'J,
/61:ro ""
o,~ot:')~J.r'
(;),p
7'31ce-7L ~/,
ville-
Ar'gO)lf
I.tI7rO
0
Vt/i. Je.,yVe
y.$
/
I
I
%
3~ ~
]MjJJ.~
/,{)oo 0
0
1
~
0
1
0
01
0 J 0
1
0
(;)
1/ 1 /
J/,DDCl
'v.s ' lJJI rti." s vi} Je at 13JoomiJJgfo7} )JJ;y·ch /3: 1,37
CHART 36
FORM OF THE EVOLVED SHOT CHART
81
cording free throws.
The second line is for the number of
shots taken for each half and for the whole game.
The third
line is for the number of shots made for each half, for the
whole game, and for the peroentage of shots made.
The
fourth line contains three spaces; the first is for the number of the guarded opponent. the second is for the player's
name, and the third is for the player's number.
is repeated for the other team.
This form
At the bottom of the chart
is a line which has space for the names of the teams playing, the place, and the date of the game.
This chart may be
mimeographed in numbers adequate for a whole season or longer.
III.
FURTHER RESEARCH PROBLEMS
The following problems arose during the study; they
were not investigated, as they did not definitely concern
the problem of shot charts as an aid in ooaching basketball:
1.
The finding of natural shooters in basketball by
the charting of shots in gymnasium classes B,nd intra.mura.l
games in the grades, in the Junior High School, and in the
Senior High School.
2.
The finding of the effectiveness of different
types of shots in basketball.
3.
.
The stUdy of offensive and defensive rebounding
in its relationship to the winning
4.
~f
games •
The ul;J:ing of percentage tables to show the tm-
82
provement shown by different styles of play and methods of
coaching, such as zone, long shot and rebound, fast break,
delayed offense, two hours of practice, three hours of practice, competitive practice, individual work, much goal shooting as compared to little goal shooting, and different styles
of passing.
5.
The charting of the time used in various phases
of a basketball game, such as passing, dribbling, shooting,
held ball, out of bounds. pivots. and holding the ball.
6.
The value of interest producing games and tests,
such as clock golf, game of 21, spot team 21, spot individual 21, and one minute test on long and short shots.
7.
The value of a check list for each indiVidual,
showing what he does in a game, inclUding his shots.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A.
BOOKS
Hager, Robert H., Peroentage Basketball.
Robert H. Hager, 19~6. 112 pp.
Corvallis, Oregon:
Advises spot or area shooting.
Meanwell, Walter E., The, Soienoe of Basket Ball for Men.
Madison, Wisoonsin: The Demoorat Printi~ompanY;-1924. '
382 pp.
Advises the use of shot oharts in soouting.
RUby, J. Craig, How to Coaoh ~ Play Be,sketball.
Illinois: Barrey and Himes, 1926. 268 pp.
Champaign,
Veenker, George F. ,Basket Ball for Coaohes and Players.
New York: A. S. Barnes and Company, 1930:--234 pp.
B.
PERIODICAL ARTICLES
Edgren, H. D., "A Study of Basketball Sooring,"
cTournal, XV, no. 7 (March, 1936), 1-44.
~
Athletic
Gives the percentage of shots made when winning and
losing.
Trythall, Donald L., "Diagnostic Basketball," The Athletic
Journal, XI, No. 6 (January, 1931), 1-48. -
Gives a checking sheet, and the per cent of goals made.
C.
PUBLICATIONS OF ORGANIZATIONS
FapsHandbook~ Basketball. Anderson, Indiana: Indiana
~tgh:SoAoOl CQa~4eB Association, V (1930-36), 96 pp.
Indiana High School Athleti2 ASBocia~ion. Indianapolis,
Indiana: IndIana High School Athletic Association,
'
Bullat1n ~o. 1, XXXII (September'l. 1955).
85
D.
SC ORE BOOKS
Adams. John L•• Adams Official Basketball Score and Scout
Book. Revised edition. Vincennes, Indiana: Houghton
and Green. 1930.
Has division for keeping the record of shots taken by
individual players.
Hall, M. 0., Individual Basket Shooting Record Chart.
stock, MichIgan: George E. Gates, 1932.
Com-
Jones, Jonss' Official Basketball Score Book and Scouting
Charts. Ionia, Michigan: Jones Basketball Score Book
Company, No.3, 1934.
Has shot chart for each team for each half.
Lowry, George K•• Lowry's Universal Basketball Score and
Scout Book. Valparaiso. Indiana: George K. Lowry:-D.d.
Contains a chart for each team's shots. and three small
charts to use in scouting plays. and an individual player's summary for eaoh game.
!!l! Mast$r Score Book. Sold by Lowe and Campbell Athletic
GOodsCompany:--Copyrighted. 1929.
Provides a shot chart for both teams by halves, and has
a player and team summary table.
McCormick and Wampler. Indiana Basketball Score and Scout
!22!. Washington, Indiana: The Spink Press,-r929.
Has shot chart by halves after each player's name.
Seal-O...San Basketball Shot Charts and Scouting Diagrams.
~Huntington. Indiana:-TheHuntington Laboratories, Inc.,
loth edition, 1936-1937.
Free charts put out by the makers of Seal-O-San. They
oontain aohart for each half with a summary table, and
soouting diagrams.
.
APPENDIX A.
SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES
87
TABLE XIII
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR WILEY AND OPPONENTS
. - . 1954...193i)
,I
P
Wiley
Reitz
Vincennes
48
29
~r,zi1
51
Garfi~ld
60
26
57
State
~lo0mfie1d
Concannon
State
6,7
4'1
~arfie1d
46
63
Princeton
BeBee
47
'13
CliXlton
Ronel Creek
Brasil
64
42
W$.sh1ngton
41
lUlel
52
52
40
\l. IDerr& Haute
State
"1ii
Garfield
L1t1ton
Average
4'1.16
. .i (, " . { .'
*.f8_
,-
"'-
dll"f","""
figtttes
Game
percentage
Game
Game'
shots shots
taken made
Games
,.
,.,"
...
11
.229
• 2'16
8
6
.118
.153
.269
8
7
10
20
13
• riLl
.299
• 2'77
.044
·113
2
6
4
.085
• 13'1
.222
10
12
11
.262
.195
8
16
.508
• 260
13
'1
• 1'16
• 2'13
12
3
• 200
Total Total
shots shots
taken made
48
77
128
188
214
271
338
386
450
483
630
603
66'/
699
'/40
792
844
884
928
943
11
19
26
33
i
i
.229
.247
.196
.176
40
60
70
83
85
.207
91
.188
96-
.1'9
.1'14
.187
.180
.216
.19'1
106
117
128
.1'18
.183
156
162
.184
.192
166
• 196
172
184
187
.198
9.31) ·198
;
Total
percent.
age
i
were for the first half of this game.
.195
.198
88
TABLE XIII (continued)
SHOT ACCUlWLATION STATISTICS
FOR WILEY AND OPPONENTS
, .1934...193ti
Opponents
Games
Reitz
Vincennes
:arazil
Garfield
5tate*
BloQ.field
CODcannon
State
Garfield
Game
flhote shots
taken made
Game
34
69
62
40
11
57
2'1
42
11
16
12
6
8
7
6
6
26
9
43
10
41
46
6
6
Waabington
I,. !f.rre Haute
34
40
fi5
2fi
~t_t.
37
20
8
12
13
3
6
'1
Lin.ton
26·
42
Princeton
~oase .
Clinton
J:totley Creek
llra:ail '
~11'1
~.i:fleld
-.
ATe.rage
37.2
12
13
Game
percent..
age
.324
.352
.230
·126
• '127
.189
.185
.143
.346
.233
.143
.111
.235
.300
.246
.120
.136
.360
.462,
.310
Total Total
shots ehQts
taken made
34
103
160
196
206
245
270
312
338
381
422
467
601
b41
694
619'
666
6'16
702
744
11
2'1
39
44
62,
69
64
70
79
89
it)
100
108
120
135
136
141
148
160
173
6.66 .233
,
,~'
:
,-;:
-
*T1lese figures were for the' first half of this
g~e.
Tote.l
perccentage
.324
.262
.2t32
.226
.262
.243
.25'1
.224
.234
.233
.225
.214
.216
.222
.224
.220
.21e
.219
.228
.233
89
TABLE XIV*
SHOT ACCmWLATION STATISTICS
FOR ROBERT LADSON
1934-1936
Games
Game
shots
taken
Game
shots
made
10
3
1
1
1
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
1
Game
percentage
Total
shots
taken
Total
shots
made
Total
percentage
,~ I
II
I
;1
:1
(I
If
il
!I
\1
I
I,
Reitz
Vincennes
Brazil
Garfield
State**
Bloomfield
Concannon
State
Garfield
Princeton
Bosse .
Clinton
IIonElY Creek
Brazil
Washington
Terr~ Haute
R11er
w.
{)
10
6
4
12
12
6
0
3
4
10
4
0
1
7
7
~t4te
2
Linton
1
4
G~r~ie1d
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
.300
.200
.100
.167
.250
.260
.083
.000
.000
.000
.000
.100
.000
.000
1.000
.000
.429
.000
.000
.000
10
16
26
31
36
4'1'
69
65
65
68
72
82
86
86
87
94
101
103
104
108
3
4
b
6
7
10
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
13
13
16
16
16
16
*Same as Table VI
**Theae figures were for the first half of this game.
,-
.300
.267
.200
.194
.200
.213
.186
.169
.169
.162
.153
.146
.140
.140
.149
.138
.168
.155
.154
.148
90
.".. ,1, ..... '"
,.·,.,2,
~1
TABLE. XVI
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR LLOYD JULIAN
19:34....195v.
•
I
Gqe
Game
Game
shots shots perce'ntage
taken made
Games
;
I
;
,j
Re1tz
11
~r$z~l
8
18
3
7
3
.364
.000
.125
.167
.429
3
.2liO
Garfield
state*
Bloom£ield
11
State
Garfield
9
6
P~Deeton
f)
14
10
Ri:~_7
~4
'.!erre Haute
~tat.
5
*',~ee.
4
.600
.214
.143
1
.200
.000
1
0
3
\'
.260
3
"I
G~#i.1tl
.000
.222
.200
.367
.126
.100
1
1
1
3
4:
5
LintQn •
.546
.333
6
8
Ii~.s11·
Waa~j,ngt()n
6
3
0
2
1
9
B<)iUs.
Clinton
RP.y Creek
,: ::,'.1
0
1
12
e,oQ.Qannon
J ':"1" S""
4
4
V1n.C8lUJ,e s·
i
Total Total
shots shots
taken made
:
11
4:
16
23
41
48
00
71
80
8&>
94
99
113
121
131
155
140
164
161
166
169
4
1)
8
11
14
20
23
23
25
26
31
52
33
54
37
40
41
42
42
",
,._,,':
; ,I
figur.a
'.'
,-,,'
'.
,
;
I.
Total
peroent..
age
4
were for the first half of this game.
.364
.267
.21 '1'
.198
.2~.9
.253
.282
.28a
• 2"~1
.266
.265
.274
.266
.262
.202
.264
.260
.265
.253
.249
92
TABLE XVII
..
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR FRANK
KELLEY-
1934-1936
Games
Reits
Vlnoennes
:tl:razil
Garfield
State*
:aloomfie1d
Con.cannon
Statet
Garfield
Princeton
15088.
G.ame
Game
shots shots
taken made
1;
:s.raz:il~
5
W', .ferre, Haute
~il.;r
~tate
tta:rfield
Linton
B
3
11
11
5
13
16
24
.091
36
1
.111
38
44
63
68
.000
2
1
.400
.000
.000
.000
• 071
·126
.200
• 286.333
2
.260
5
·2'13
2
a
.077
.000
·111
.533
1
'1
age
Total Total
shots shots
taken made
1
0
2
0
0
0
1
1
6
'1
S
14
W~$b,lngton· .
1
1
9
Clinton
ione, Creek
1
0
15
2
9
11
3
6
Game
percent-
1
.1a~
• 333
64
71
77
91
99
104
III
114
126
133
144
147
1
1
2
5
4
4
6
7
7
7
7
8
9
10
12
13
Ii)
l'
20
21
4 ",
*!fb.ese figure.s .re for the first half of this game.
Total
percentage
.07:7
.06-7
• 085
.086
·10i
• 091
• 094
.121
·109
.099
• 091
.Oa6
• 091
.096
.108
.114
.120
·128
.139
• 143
93
TA,BLE XVIII
SHOT AC(H)MUL4T ION STATISTICS
. FOR.-
WQ,O~QW
\'lEy
.19~4-19;ic
,
t ,;
Game
Geunee
eb..ate
taken made
i
4:
3
8
V1ncannes
:$raai1
Garfield
14
State*
~
i1ooJDti.1d
Concarmon
S
7
(;.a:rfielti
3
0
~t~te
~rln~eton
4
Bo•• e
C1i.nton
Cr.,k
·go~y
~.i1-.
W.,eb.1:nstQn
W·. Terr_ Haute
:a41'7
S,tate
Ge.rf:1.1cl
..
age
Tote,l
Total
Total
shots shots percent ...
taken made
age
.
"
.
0
0
0
2
0
• 000
• 000
.000
.143
.000
1
16
29
2
2
1
.2DO
52
0
0
0
2
2
40
4
.2aB6
41
60
'I
.140
8
.127
.156
0
0
0
0
.000
1
0
~
1
1
.
4:
3
8
.333
.000
.260
.000
.000
i
'l
6
2
'4
Linton
J..
Game
perc~nt
j
Reitz
p .... J. '.' e
Game
ehots
;
2
1
a
1
.000
• 260
.600
.600
.333
• 2bO
• 260
4
~o
69
64
11
77
'19
85
86
89
92-
100
104
6
,.
8
8
8
8
9
10
12
13
16
16
.J
~~.ae figures were for the first half of this game.
.000
.000
.000
.Oi9
.063
.100
.128
• lEi)
.113
.104
.101
.108
• 118
• 13b
.141
.1£>0
.lti4
94
TABLE XIX*
SHOT ACOUMULATION STATISTICS
.FOR GORDON.MOLAUGHLIN
1934-1936
.,
Game
Game
shots
taken made
Games
shots
at91tz
Vincennes
:Brazil
Garfield
State**
Bloomfield
stat.
Q,arf1eld
frince,ton
l3,9$J!'·
Clinton
W. Terre lfa1tte
et.e.t"
10
J.raall
Washington
.,
:.
'...;"'C h
1
3
6
1
3
1
1
9
0
,
*~a~e aa T.QlJ!1
*~W:b.e8e fipres
i~
0
'I
tJe.rf1,e1cl
'1
2
0
6
4
1
0
,
~one1C:eek
".M", .
1
15
10
10
14
6
'1
~1~to~
3
2
9
11
16
16
Concannon
~i1'J·:
0
0
8
8
"1
8
;
('
2
0
i
t.'
t "
Game
percentage
.000
• 3'16
.260
.143
.250
• 000
.646
.250
.063
• 000
.000
·100
• 300
• 429
• 1&'1
• 419
.143
·100
Total Tot.al
shots shots
taken made
0
8
16
0
3
5
23
31
40
6
6
8
61
6"1
83
98
10'1
11'1
127
141
14'1
164
161
In
180
160
• 222
• 000
'~
14
18
19
19
19
20
23
29
00
33
34
36
57
37
'I
VII
weX'e fOr the first half of this game,
Total
percentage
• 000
.376
.313
.261
.356
.200
• 2'16
• 269
.229
.193
.178
· I'll
.181
• ~O6
.204
.214
• 211
.205
.206
• 20a
95
96
TABLE. XXI
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR WILSON WEY
1934..1936
Games
ReitzVincezmes
:araz-~l
Garfield
8tate*
Bloomfield
Concannon
State
Garfield
Princeton
Bosse
Clinto'n
Honey Creek
Brazil
Washington
W. Terre Haute
Riley
Stf1te
Garfield
Linton
Game
shots
taken
Game
shots
made
Game
percent ..
age
2
0
1
0
.000
.bOO
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
1.000
.000
.000
.000
2
4
0
0
3
3
0
a
0
a
0
a
a
1
4
1
a
0
0
a
a
a
0
a
a
a
0
0
0
0
0
a
a
1
0
0
Total
shots
taken
2
4
8
8
8
11
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
16
19
20
20
20
20
Total
shots
made
Total
percentage
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.000
.2t>0
.125
.125
.125
.091
.071
.0'71
.0'71
.0'71
.0'71
.0'71
.071
.0'71
.067
.Ob3
.100
.100
.100
.100
2
2
2
2
*Theee figures were for the first half of this game.
,
.,
~
'.
97
'llABLEXXI I
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR ROBERT COLWELL.
1934-193b.
Games
Reitz
Vinoennes
Brazil
Garfield
State*
Bloomfield
COncannon
State
Garfield
PrincEtton
Bosse
C·linton
Honey Crfilek
Brazil.
Was~ington
w.
Terre Haute
R:J.ley
St~t~
~arfield
Linton
*The:t~e fi~res
i:"
Game
Game
shots shots
taken made
0
1
1
0
0
£)
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Game
percentage
.000
1.000
.000
.000
.000
.400
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
1 0tal Total
shots shots
taken made
1
0
1
2
2
2
7
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
were for the first half of this game.
Total
percentage
.000
1.000
.600
.600
.600
.429
.300
.300
•.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
98
TAELE XXIII
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR
G~,ORGE
' BLOOICSOM
19~4-195Q
G8,lqea
Reitll
Vfncennes
J$:razil
Garfield
stat.*
'~loomflela.
ConcaMon
State
~arfield.
Princeton
Boese.
Clinton
~onel Oreek
Brazil'
Washington
fl. Terre Haute
llilel
flt,te
"rf1e14
Lintoa" '
·Th.'.
'.
Geme
Game
Game
shots shots peraent..
taken made
age
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
()
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
6
1
5
1
2
1
2
4
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
.260
.000
.000
• 000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.167
.000
.000
• OGO
·600
·000
.000
• flOO
·000
.000
• 000
• 000
Total Total
shote ehots
taken made
4
4
4
ti
6
ti
1
1
1
b
1
1
22
2
1
1
1
6
11
12
16
2
16
18
3
5
3
19
21
2b
26
20
24.')
2b
II
0
Q
~
'.
fl
figures were fGr the first half ot this galle.
Total
percent.
age
• 260
.260
.260
.200
.200
.200
.200
• 200
.182
.167
.133
.126
• 167
• 1~8
.145
.200
• 200
.200
·200
.200
99
1l ABLE XXIV
SHOT AOCUMULATION ST4TISTICS
FOR WILEY AND OPPO~S
." 1936-1936
Wiley
Games
Game
Game
Game
Total Total
shots shots pera,ent.. shots shots
taken made
age
taken made
R.1tt
65
81
~d.cknel1
Vtubennes
Greenfield
Ga:r:t1$ld
'1
6"1
6'1
39
f;}~ate
ir$s11
BlooJDfield
¥itc):).ell
41
61
58
6'
H0n81Creek
Conoannon
89
54
,1.bn '
fe.ng~e.r
75
61
~1"$hal1
»;r;t.a!eport
O~;ton~ .'
6.7
41
69
48
~rlnQeton
13088e"
~u.11ivan
~:tt~~top
Fl!tte;rBbu~g
Glenn
~~t{net.
(:aX-field
Sp..~.t
:Jart1nlll't1:J,le
Average
;";
4 '.
6
10
16
l~
11
12:
1'1
21
12
20
18
11
10
1'7
8
Go
15
&9
15
44
$.reencastle
:~
14
16
11
'1
.216
.186.
·156
·090
.1715
.410
.293
.216
.207
.266
630
694
683
1096
1161
'137
.1SS
.159
.1'19
1274
1591
.246
54
62
51
13
.232
~O
.370
12
ca5
421
·16'1
.250
Ie
:).4
472
284
341
810
871
958
9'19
1048
10
'79
63
580
14
29
40
46
56
'12-
.236
.222
.2'14
·296
·164
.244
.246
po 61
66
14
15
66
14p
217
.226
• 21ii
.1'17
.190
1230
64
107
124
146
lt37
17'1
196
20G
216
233
241
266
269
2'16
Total
percentage
.215
.199
.184
.162
.164
.169
.200
.201
.202
.209
.212
.2J.3
.219
.224
.220
.251
.232
.220
.220
.219
.217
.216
dU6
1447
1601
lfi63
266
501
314
334
348
1614
1693
361
3'16
.223
.223
·224
.222
1'156
38'7
1330
.217
.220
• 2~t)
. 11./
l"
e. t ; ,.
100
1'ABLE XXIV (Continued)
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR WILEY AND OPPONENTS
·1930...1936
Opponents
Game em
Reitz
B~cknel1
Vineexmas
Gre_nfie1d
Garfield
Sta.te
Game
ahote
made
39
14
38
66
rz
40
45
~r.lil
llloomfieid
Mit Qhe11
9
6
50
10
68
Spenoer _ ,
lIartinavil1e
Average
-
"
-
-
67
6'1
• 246
.258
.235
.210
.206
.201
135
173
216
232
282
318
586
441
467
6
·171
·243
·182
659
9
3'1
9
55
68
57
59
62
6
9
12
13
13
10
'1
1'1
10
6
11
S
44
11
11
46
9
61
...
.369
.116
ti6
S..:rf1eld
·194
14
21
32
43
62
rzrz
3
41
~on'anet
• 515
• 200
59
8
31
60
Riley
• 209
Total
ahats
made
bc
40 .
.1'enn
.369
.184
·196
• 2'16
Total
ahote
taken
26
55
63
66
Greencastle
Petersburg
7
Game
percentage
·145
.14fl
60
Washington
11
11
16
36
lioney Creak
Conc&'Qon
Glenn
Tangier
J4t8ha11
:Bridgeport Oblong
Princeton
BoeseSUllivan
B1;8s11-
::
Game
sbots
taken
_j.9
19
9.7
·16~
• 324
• 220
• 210
·16'1
.152
• 504
• 260
·161
.1'10
.19b
.194
.250
.200
.573
602
b72
650
067
'126
788
848
901
967
997
1~28
1095
1134
1190
12Z-4
1279
1330
'14
8:5
91
94
100
109
116
124
156
149
162
1'12
179
196
206
211
222
230
241
262
261
260
Total
percentage
.275
• 241
• 249
• 241
·199
.202
• 201
·19'1
.204
.206
• 20G
.205
.199
.20b
• 20'1
.20fl
.203
.203
.203
.204
.204
.211
.211
101
TABLE XXV*
SHOT ACCUlIDLATION STATISTICS
FOR GORDON MCLAVGHLIN
1936...1936
Game
Game
shots shots
taken made
Games
Reitz
lUoknel1
19
20
16
18
9
11
16
Vinoennes
Greenfield
Garfield
state
:Braail
Bloomfield.
Mitchell
Ronel' Creek
Concannon
Gleim
Tangier
Marshall
;Bridgeport
Oblong
9
17
84
6
14
14
10
BOsse
"
4
.269
.067
·160
2'7
E)
£;
1
12
45
S
2'
6.
20-
"
2'1
Qarfte:ld
19
3p.~c.r
~1!t1n.vi11e
:
",;"., i ;".) ,', i,t [..t" t
j,.
.,
'.
•
,',-',
(
4
0
.417
.300
.286
.222
.211
.200
3
.lti8
",' 2: ~... :. ,;:'.. t.: '.t: ,;, ,i
,
-',"
a.,.. e.a
*
2;;
19
.260
8
4
2
3
27
.168
' .100
.000
.066
.222
d546
• 200
.444
.176
.600
·145
.2.86
.200
.130
·429
.186
.118
.267
16
26
J<Ultanet
-
3
2
Waebington
Greflneastle
Glenn
-
4
3
6
2
~lef
I
6
3
1'7
50
~etere\)u.:rg
0
2
Sullivan
Br.azil
,-
2
0
1
23
14
~r1nc.ton
3
Game
peroentage
.4
'J
~@~ .V~II
"
,_
t-
H
~,
~
.
Total Total
shots shots
taken made.
19
39
64
3
D
6
72
&
81
92
10'1
116
13a
16'1
163
177
191
201
8
14
17
21
24
30
33
36
39
41
224
238
44
266
66
6'1
66
60
282
312
339
364
72
73
77
379
391
411
418
82
88
90
446
464
489
508
100
96
lOti
106
,
Total
peroent.
age
.lb8
.128
.093
.083
•099
·162
·169
·181
·180
.191
.202
·197
• 204
.203
.196
.210
.208
.202
.209
.212
• 206
• 203
.210
.214
• 215
• 216
• 216
• 216
.215
:
102
~ABLE
XXVI*
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR VICTOR ALDRIDGE
1936-1956
Games
I
I
j
I,'\
,I
Game
shots
taken
Reitz
Bicknell
Vincennes
Greenfield
Garfield
State
Erazil
B;J.oomfie1d
1U.tohe11
Hone,y Creek
C;oncannon
Glenn.
Tangier
Mareha11
Br:l,.dgeport
Oblong
8
1
3
0
5
9
10
10
1
0
1
6
1'1
1'1
:Bosse
Slll11van
2
1
Wafil~1ngton
I
"
k. :
*S'ame' ~$ TABLE XI
2
0
a
6
0
0
6.
0
2.
a
"~tlnlv111e
3
3
3
0
1
1
0
5
4
0'
G&tf:t.eld
Spe'ueer
.
6
6
0
9
Glenn
Rile,
'oatanet
~~'t:#
:;
8
G:re4!no8i:ltle
':'. I ' , · "
9
1
3
~6'ter~bu1'g
.
3
4:
'1
l.l:raz11
M
3
2
14
12
6
11
4
16
~rineeton
Game
shots
made
0
2
Game
percentage
.126
.000
.200
.000
.100
.300
.555
.1'16
.255
.145
.143
.333
.260
.600
.275
• tiOO
.313
.000
.000
.000
·000
.111
·260
·000
.600
.000
.000
.533
.260
Total
shots
taken
8
11
16
26
36
46
61
68
86
99
106
116
127
132
143
14'1
163
169
170
1'15
181
190
194
194
200
200
200
206
214
Total
shots
made
1
1
2
2
3
6
8
11
16
17
18
21
24
27
30
32
3'1
37
37
37
5'1
58
59
59
42
42
42
44
46
Total
percentege
.126
• 091
·126
• 080
• 086
·135
·167
.16!
·1'16
.172·170
·183
·la9
• 206
.210
·218
.227
.219
,218
·214
·204
·200
·201
·201
·210
.210
,210
.214
.216
103
TABLE XXVII
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR LLOYDJULI~
193fl~195p
104
TABLE XXVIII
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR WOODROW ·\WY
1936-1956
Game Game
Ga~e
shots shots percent...
taken made
age
Games
Tote.1
Total
shots shots peroe:p.t'!'"
taken made'
age
Total
j
Reits
Vincenne.
·Greenfield
G$~f1eld
imall
Bloomfield
:M:ltQ:tlell
Koney Creelc
Co~annon
Glenn.
Tangter
Me.~shall
J3rldgeport
.
Sttl11van.
iraall
W~~ngto:a.
$reencaa.tle
I>et.r.bu..r~
Glenn
Bile,
'o.ntanet
Garfield.
8.penou
;
:.
.625
7
2-
8
11
3
3
.286
.3'16
.2'15
"l
2
.286
8'1
8
£)
9
10
10
2
3
1
6
1
2
2
·626
.222
.300
·100
.16.7
.143
.228
.444
.000
96
104
114
124
130
144
163
162
172
184
9
Princeton
-
0
14
OblGDg
JJe;rt1na.T1118
:::;, .... ," 1 -. ',I 'r·~.·,,'·, :'f.
1
3
.200
.000
.083
.200
a
8,
State
])0888
2
10
9
1215
Bicknell
9
10
II
10
7
1
0
0
4:
0
4
2
0'·
10
a
6
9
6
2
.'
13
\}
... :.;
;
,
.I
1
3
1
3
1
,t·'·! 'l)'i,"'j
;,~"
10
19
31
46
64
61
69
80
.33~
.200
·14:3
.000
.000
.100
.500
.222
194
£01
201
201
211
211
226-
232
245
.16'1
.231
.111
:;St',T"' r i . ~
\'"
2f)4
'
.200
2.
2
3
.10L;
.09'1
.130
6
11
13
16
19
21
26
.2.04
.215
.232
.258
.241
.274
.269
.272
28
31
32
.2b8
33
.264
.243
.241
.253
.238
.246
.242
.239
.259
.239
.232·
.240
.239
.237
35
37
41
41
45
4'1
48
48
48
49
62
64
oil
68
fi9
J
.237'
.232
A
lOb
TABLE XXIX
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTIOS
FOR KENNETH VOGEL,
1930-1936.
Games
Rtlitt
Bieknell
Vincennes
Greenfield
Garfield
StJ;te .
Brazil
B.loomfield
M1.tobel1
!;()net Creek
Concannon
Glenn
Tang:1:er
"rahall
:&~ldgeport
Ob:J.ollg
.Pr:tnoeton
~O'I.
~htll1vo.n
~2:al:Ll
Was111ns1:oa
Q;.,uo.. ,tl.
!.te;rlbw,Jg
G:J,.nu
Bll.,.
Game
Game
ehots shots percent ..
age
taken made
Game
10
13
1
3
0
4
1
1
0
0
0
8
0
8
3
1
1
1
0
.,
4
4
8
6
5
1
0
a
0
0
0
1
0
0
~,
4:
wart1nlv111.
8
7
t
2
2
,
$pen•• r
a
0
2
8
4:
; ..1!t1tld
:r.~ltWlet
1
2
8
3
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
.100
.260
·0'17
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.120
.333
.000
.tiOO
.260
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.600
.2tiO
.2bO
.QOO
.000
.260
.533
.143
.i2fS
.143
Total
i ' otal
shots percent..
taken made
e.ge
Tot~l
ab.ots
10
18
31
34
38
39
40
40
65
61
64
1
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4:
5
6
66
69
,.,3
6
8
81
9
86
9
91
9
9
9
93
10
101
lOti
12
13
13
III
14
89
91
10'1
10'1'
114
121
129
136
9
.100
·16'1
·129
.118
.106
.103
·100
.089
.076
.082
.094
.092
·116
.125
.111
.106
·101
.099
.099
.108
.119
.124
.122
i5
.122
16
.132
·132
.132
.132
16
1"
18
.126
106
TAl3LE
xxx
SHOT AOCUMULATION STATISTICS
,FOR
WrL~ON-w.my
19~fj.lg36
Game
Game
shots ehots
te.ken made
Games
Beits
:i31oknell
Vincennes
Greenfield
Garfield
State
iraz:tl
S
9
Rona;, Creek
1
"
1
0
0
2-
Concannon
10
Glenn
fi
1
TtLJtg~-er
M8rshall
5
BndgsiPort
0
11
Oblong
Princeton
Bosse
2
3
Stt11~van
:ara~11
2:
7
Wa.,h1ngton
1
Greencastle
Petereburg
3
Glenn
:Eil1"J
:rf.onte.net
Gar.tleld
Spenoer
¥art1nsville
,I
0
'1
0
0
0
lIq,tchell
;:
6
15
Bl~oJDtleld
2
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
a
1
a
0
2
4
0
4:
4:
2.
1
0
4:
0
0
1
0
i
3
1
0
0
G$JD&
percentage
.600
.111
.000
.143
.133
.2"0
.000
.000
.000
.000
.100
.000
.000
.400
.000
.000
.000
.000
.600
.000
.000
.667
.000
.000
.200
.000
.000
.000
.2t>0
Total Total Total
shots shots percenttaken made
age
fj
4
27
Q
4246
46
46
46
48
fi8
65
64
69
69
'10
'1275
77
84
85
88
ge
96
100
loa
102
102
106
;~
3
14
20
4
7
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
14
14
14
15
16
16
16
16
.600
.286
.200
.18b
.16'1
.174
.174
.174
.174
.167
.1b;)
.143
.140
.169
.lb9
.16'1
.lb3
.147
.166
.143
.141
.169
.162
.146
.160
.14'1
.147
.147
.161
107
TABLE XXXI
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR ROBERT COLWELL
1936-1936
108
TABLE XXXII
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR HAROLD HESS
1935-1936
Games
Re1t~
Bicknell
Vincetmes
Greenfield
Garfield
State
Brazil
Bloottlfield
Mitchell
Honey Creek
Ooncannon
Glenn
Tangier
Marshall
Bridgeport
Oblong
Princeton
:Bosse
Sullivan
Brazil
Washington
Greencastle
Petersburg
Glenrt
Riley
Fontanet
~arf1eld
Spenoer
Mert1nsv111e
,
,i.,
Game
shots
taken
2
2
4
0
0
0
4
3
1
1
5
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I'
0
3
0
0
0
0
Game
shots
made
Game
percentage
Total
shots
taken
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.600
1.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.400
.000
.000
.600
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
2
4
8
8
8
8
12
16
16
17
22
22
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
26
26
28
28
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
)
..
28
28
28
Total
shots
made
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
{)
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Total
percentage
.600
.760
.375
.375
.375
.37b
.250
.200
.188
.176
.227
.227
.227
.250
.250
.200
.250
.260
.250
.260
.260
.250
.240
.240
.214
.214
.214
.214
.214
109
TABLE XXXIII
SHOT ACOUlruLATION STATISTICS
FOR OTTO DUENWEG
1936-1936
Games
Reitz
Bicknell
Vincennes
Greenfield
Garfield
State
Brazil
Bloomfield
Mitohell
Honey Creek
Oonoannon
Glenn
Tangier
Marshall
Bridgeport
Oblong
Prinoeton
BOsse
SUlli.van
Braz1'-1
Washington
Greencastle
Petersburg
Glenn
Riley
Fontanet
<
:
~
Garfield
tapeneet
Martinsville
Game
shots
taken
Game
shots
made
Game
peroentage
a
3
a
a
1
a
a
a
0
a
14
a
a
0
a
a
a
a
a
a
0
a
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.286
.000
.000
1.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
1.000
.000
.000
.000
.200
.000
.000
.000
.000
1
2
a
a
1
a
a
a
1
a
o·
a
6
0
a
0
0
4
a
0
2
a
a
a
a
0
a
1
0
0
a
1
0
0
0
a
Total Total
shots shots
taken made
a
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
18
18
19
21
21
21
22
22
22
22
23
23
23
23
28
28
28
28
28
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
0
0
0
4
4
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
Total
peroentage
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.222
.222
.211
.286
.286
.286
.273
.273
.273
.273
.304
.304
.304
.304
.286
.286
.286
.286
.286
.
110
TABLE XXXIV
SHOT ACCLmruLATION STATISTICS
FOR NELSON HAVILL
1935-1936
Games
Reitz
Bicknell
Vinoennes
Greenfield
Garfield
State
Brazil
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Honey Creek
Concannon
Glehn
Tangier
Marshall
B:ri dgep art
Oblong
Princeton
Bosse
Sullivan
Brazil
Washington
Greenoastle
Pet.ersburg
Glenn
Riley
Fontanet
Garfield
Spen.oer
Martinsville
. ;;,-,
Game
shots
taken
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
0
6
0
a
5
a
a
a
a
0
a
a
a
1:0
4
0
0
a
a
Game
shots
made
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
0
a
a
0
a
a
1
0
1
a
a
a
0
Game
percentage
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
1.000
.000
.2bO
.000
.000
.000
.000
Total
shots
taken
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
6
6
6
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
16
16
16
16
16
Total
shots
made
Total
percentage
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.083
.083
.12b
.120
.126
.12b
.120
1
1
2.
2
2
2
2
111
TABLE. XXXV.
SHOT
ACaUMULATIO~
STATISTICS
FOR WILEY AND OPPONENTS
1936..1937
Wiley
Game
percent ..
age
Game
shots shots
taken made
Game
Games
~pencer
68
15
6
1'1
63
6
flO
6
61
10
12
10
21
18
9
16
13
14
68
Gree;ncast1e
Bioknel1
Bedford
63
.A1ex~ndria
$arf1fit1d
S'f;&te
Bloomfield
Kitchell
Bra,,11·
Sullivan
W. Ttrre Haute
lUley
60
65
76
6'1
41
66
61
61
Glenn.
:B.noevi11e
68
.191
.132
.260
.09g
.120
.196
.186
.10g
.276
Prinoe-ton
6B
67
9
16
Waahington
46
66
67
10
13
.194
12
14
••186
13Q88e ..
P~t:er8burg
:R11et
lobtanet
8.~t'.
66
58
60
_tt:1."~1~e
49
I'l••nto
l,l.
l,_ "
4.l
•
•
,
,,','>,\<'.-
'·"'.'-I,.!
. " ',I'
*~ ..m.as T~T·
Of ,..
'111
7f'/2
833
891
962
1016
10'13
1150
1176
1242
1309
1373
1429
148'1
164'1
1603
1662
.260
.224
.185
.36'1
.122
20
6
69
i
.OJ
. ~.
66ii
.22'1
13
11
660
Aijrag.
'" -- ~., 11-.' ,,,,, '. ,.,
6
64
667
614
.213
.230
.138
.197
.301
.115i
.263
.130
14
16
irftll1
418
481
.286
'71
63
~lalnv111e
363
.220
Aehboro
Ft,ittnetsntb:g
68
121
189
262
302
.33.6·
8
Total Total
shots shots
taken made
13
19
56
42
48
68
70
80
101
119
128
144
16'1
171
1'19
193
209
218
253
239
264
26'1
279
293
506
51'1
35'1
343
Total
percent ..
age
.191
.16'1
.190
.167
.169
.164
.16'1
.166.
.181
.198
.196
.203
.203
.206
.201
.201
.206
.203
.206
.203
.206
.204
.203
.205
.206
.206
.210
.208
12.26 .208
,
~\. . ," ,I,."
,:
{.' -
.'
I
.... --,,",,'"
"g'
b
i
.,
112
';i1
,
II
TABLE XXXV ( continued) *
J
;1
I
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR WILEY AND OPPONENTS
r
1936-1937
I
I
I
Opponents
Game
Game
shots shots pel'centage
taken made
G$DlG
Games
Spencer
Greenoastle
Bioknell
Bedford
41e.xandr1a
Garfield
state
46
46
44
57
32
37
10
10
7
13
10
39
~loQmf1eld
39
46
64
48
62
08
65
57
49
47
0
10
6
6
8
6
10
Mitohell
Brazil
Sull1'van
w. Terre Haute
Riley
fllenn
Bruceville
Farmersbu.rg
.4.~b,boro
PlainVille
48
W~t1h.:tngton
47
01
B()~se
Pe.t~t'sburg
~l~y
]'ontane:t
~t~te
P·i_nto
k~1:nav111e
.Av_rage
*same
8a
'1
4'1 "
36
36
13
6
64
49
68
9
2.
9
18
4., .05
"
I
'1
10
10
10
8
10
46
iraz!l
"
7.
4
bo
Pr1n~eton
.'~-l
7
"
..
~
TAJ3LE
8.20 .1'16
-
1
i
V
I
i
.222
.222
.169
.228
.313
.189
.000
.266
.133
·111
.167
.081
.172
.132
.108
.143
.213
.182
.222
.167
.213
.13'1
.27'1
.139
.006
.167
.184
.. 310
•
{continued)
Total Total
Total
shots shots percenttaken made
age
46
90
134
191
223
260
299
338
363
437
486
647
60t!
6b8
696
7.44
791
846
891
939
986
1037
1084
1120
1166
1210
1209
1317
10
20
27
40
bO
67
6'1
67
'13
79
87
92
102
109
115
120
130
140
160
Ifi8
168
176
186
193
196
204
213
231
.222
.222
.201
.209
.224
.219
.191
.198
.191
.181
.179
.168
.169
.166
.163
.161
.164
.166
.168
.168
.170
.169
.173
.172
.169
.169
.169
.176
113
TABLE
xxxvi*
SHOT ACCillvmLATION STATISTICS
FOR GORDON MCLAUGHLIN
1936-1937
Game
Game
shots shots
taken made
Games
Spencer
Greencastle
Bicknell
Bedford
Alexandria
Garfield
State
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Brazil
Sullivan
W. Terre Haute
Riley
Glenn.
Bruceville
Farmersburg
Ashboro
PlainVille
Princeton
Braz.il
Washington
Bosse
Pe.tersburg
R1le.y
Fontanet
State
P111lento
Me.rtinsville
-
,-
i~
-
~
:;
.S
f
,_.
j
0
0
18
50
16
20
14
19
26
20
9
10
19
16
0
20
22
18
16
13
29
eo.
27;
15
11
21
23
Ie
j.
'I' .
,
*sam_
al!l T.AJ;3:4:m DC '
0
0
6
4
1
2
3
5
9
6
6
4
7
3
0
2
8
3
3
1
'l
3
'1
3
3
3
8
3
Game
peroent..,
age
.000
.000
.333
.133
.063
.100
.214
.168
.346
.250
.666
.400
.368
.188
.000
.100
.364
.167
.188
.077
.241
.160
.259
.200
.273
.143
.348
.167
Total
shots
taken
Total
shots
made
0
0
0
0
18
48
64
84
98
117
143
163
172
182
201
217
217
237
269
277
293
306
336
355
382
397
408
429
462
470
6
10
11
13
16
19
28
33
38
42
49
62
62
54
62
65
68
69
76
79
86
89
92
95
103
106
Total
peroentage
.000
.000
.333
.208
.172
.166
.165
.162
.196
.202
.221
.231
.244
.240
.240
.228
.239
.236
.232
.226
.227
.223
.226
.244 .
.226
.221
.228
.226
114
TABLE xxxVII*
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR VICTOR ALDRIDGE
1936-1937
Games
Game
shots
ta,ken
Game
shots
made
Game
percentage
Total
shots
taken
14
10
11
10
13
8
14
14
11
13
9
16
4
1
0
2
2
3
3
3
3
6
3
6
2
3
1
3
3
0
3
.286
.100
.000
.200
.154
.375
.214
.214
.273
.385
.333
.375
.222
.214
.066
.214
.300
.000
.188
.176
.236
.182
.167
.333
.200
.100
.500
.200
14
24
35
45
58
64
78
92
103
116
125
141
160
164
182
196
206
217
233
250
267
289
307
322
342
362
378
383
Spencer
~+eenoast1e
Bicknell
B$dfOrd
Alexap.dria
Garfield
State
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Brazil
Sullivan
W. Terre Haute
Riley
Glenn .
Bru'oevil1e
Farmersburg
Ashboro
P1$invi11e
Prinoeton
13:re.zil
Wa$hington
:aOSBe
Pete,rsburg
R11ef
J!'ontanet
atate
~1Ulftnto
Martinsville
0
"
'.
*Same
as TABLE XII
9
14
18
14
10
11
16
17
17
22
18'
16
20
20
16
5
3
4
4
3
6
4
2
8
1
Total
shots
made
4
b
6
7
9
12
15
18
21
26
29
36
37
40
41
44
47
47
60
63
57
61
64
69
73
75
83
84
Total
percentage
.286
.208
.143
.156
.155
.188
.192
.196
.204
.224
.232
.248
.247
.244
.225
.224
.228
.217
.216
.212
.213
.211
.208
.214
.214
.207
.220
.219
.
116
TABLE XXXVII,I
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR ELVIN MAHAN
1936-1937
Games
Spencer
Greencastle
Bicknell
Bedford
Alexandria
Garfield
State
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Bra~il
Sullivan
W. Terre Haute
Riley
Glenn
Bruceville
Farmersburg
Ashboro
Plainville
Princeton
Bra~i1
Ri1ey
Fontanet
~tat.
l'ittlentQ
~rt1nav111e
,-t
,-
-
, =
-
. J is
Game
shots
made
Game
percent ...
age
Total
shots
taken
22
16
6
7
6
1
7
0
6
10
8
4
9
4
0
2
0
1
0
0
.182
.000
.333
.000
.167
.000
.000
.000
.bOO
.300
.000
.000
.111
.600
.273
.333
.167
.000
.500
.000
.182
.376
.250
.363
.286
.600
.260
.143
. 22
38
44
bl
57
b8
66
66
71
81
89
93
102
104
116
118
124
129
137
143
164
162
16:6
177
184
189
197
204
2
11
3
6
5
8
6
Washington
Boss.e
Petersburg
"
Game
shots
taken
,
.
11
8
411
7
5
8
7
a
3
3
0
0
1
1
3
1
1
a
4
0
2
3
1
4
2
3
2
1
Total
shots
made
4
4
6
6
7
7
7
7
10
13
13
13
14
16
18
19
20
20
24
24
26
29
30
34
36
39
41
42
Total
percent ...
age
.182
.106
.136
.118
.123
.121
.108
.108
.141
.160
.146
.140
.137
.144
.167
.161
.161
.166
.176
.168
.169
.179
.181
.192
.196
.206
.208
.206
116
TABLE XXXIX
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR HAROLD HESS
1936-1937
Games
Spencer
Greencastle
Bicknell
Bed.ford
Alexandria
Garfield
State
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Brazil
SUllivan
W. Terre Haute
Riley
Glenn
Bruoeville
Farmersburg
Ashboro
Plainville
Pririoeton
Brazil
Washington
Bosee
Petersburg
~i.:l·$f
Fontanet
~tate
~1btento
MartinSTille
Game
shots
taken
Game
shots
made
Game
percentage
Total
shots
taken
17
7
8
10
6
9
14
11
6
4
10
3
9
15
13
18
8
13
14
5
6
10
4
.236
.000
.500
.000
.000
.333
.143
.182
.333
.500
.100
.000
.000
.267
.164
.222
.376
.308
.143
.200
.167
.200
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
17
24
32
42
48
b7
71
82
88
92
102
105
114
129
142
160
168
181
195
200
206
216
216
216
216
216
216
216
O'
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
3
2
2
2
2
1
0
0
4
2
4
3
4
2
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
shots
made
4
4
8
8
8
11
13
15
17
19
20
20
20
24
26
30
33
37
39
40
41
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
Total
percentage
.235
.167
.250
.190
.167
.193
.183
.183
.193
.207
.196
.190
.175
.186
.183
.187
.196
.204
.200
.200
.199
.199
.199
.199
.199
.199
.199
.199
.
117
TABLE XL*
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR CLIFFORD FORSYTH
1936-1937
118
TABLE
XLI*
SHOT ACCmmLATIOn STATISTICS
FOR HAROLD BOWSHER
1936-1937
Games
Game
shots
taken
Spencer
Greencastle
Bicknell
Bedford
Alexandria
Garfield
State
Bloomfield
Mitchell
.Br&~i1
Sullivan
W. Terre Haute
Riley
Glenn
Bl11Qevi11e
Farmersburg
Aahboro
1'1a1nv11le
Princeton
Brazil
Washington
Bosse
Petersburg
Riley
Fontanet
State
Pimento
Kartinsv11le
*Same
Sf;)
TABLE II
9
4
4
3
4
8
6
13
7
6
4
£)
6
8
4
9
6
4
Game
shots
made
Game
percentage
Total
shots
taken
1
0
.111
.000
.000
.000
.000
.126
.333
.154
.286
.167
.000
.000
.167
.260
.000
.222
.000
.000
.500
.000
.000
.000
.000
.333
.250
.200
.600
.000
g
13
17
20
24
32
38
61
68
1
1
1
1
1
2
64
9
9
9
10
12
12
14
14
14
16
16
16
16
1t
16
18
19
20
20
a
a
a
1
2
2
2
1
0
a
1
2
0
2
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
8
f>
2
4
1
1
0
2
0
2
a
O'
2
68
73
79
87
91
100
106
109
111
111
113
116
116
119
127
132
134
138
Total
shots
made
4
6
a
1'ota1
percentage
.111
.077
.06g
.060
.042
.063
.106
.118
.138
.141
.132
.123
.127
.138
.132
.140
.133
.128
.156
.136
.135
.129
.129
.154 '
.142
.144
.149
.146
119
TABLE XLII*'
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR JAMES MCKINNEY
1936-1937
Games
Ga.me
Ga.me
shots shots
taken made
Spenoer
Greencastle
Bicknell
Bedf()rd
Alexandria
Ga.rfield
State
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Bra~il
Sullivan
w. Terre Ha.ute
Riley
Glenn
Bruceville
Farmersburg
Ashboro
Plain1'ille
princeton
Brazil
Washington
Bosse
Pe~ersburg
R11e~
Fontanet
State
Pimento
Martinsville
.r
1'.. " -
*Same as TABLE IV
'.
"
2
9
6
1
2
1
0
3
8
0
0
1
2
0
4
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
9'
0
1
1
2
1
0
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
Game
peroentage
.000
.444
.600
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.126
.000
.000
.000
.500
.000
.500
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.335
.111
.000
.000
.000
.bOO
.000
Total Total
shots shots
taken ma.de
2
11
16
17
19
20
20
23
31
31
31
32
34
34
38
38
38
38
38
39
39
42
til
b1
62
65
66
66
0
4
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
9
9
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
12
13
13
13
13
14
14
Total
peroentage
.000
.364
.438
.412
.368
.360
.360
.304
.258
.258
.258
.250
.265
.265
.289
.289
.289
.289
.289
.282
.282
.286
.256
.2b6
.260
.243
.266
.260
120
TABLE XLIII
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FOR JOHN HART
1936-1937
Games
Spencer
Greencastle
Bicknell
Bedford
Alexandria
Garfield
State
Blbom:fie1d
Mitchell
Braail
Sullivan
W. Terre Haute
Riley
Glenn
Bruoeville
Farmersburg
Ashboro
Plainville
Princeton
Brazil
Washington
~osse
a
a
a
1
a
2
0
Game
shots
made
Game
percentage
0
0
0
.000
.000
.000
.000
1.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.667
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
a
1
0
a
4
0
0
3
2
a
0
a
a
1
a
a
a
0
a
0
7
0
0
4-
P1tn$nto
3
6
_rt1naville
.~
0
Petersburg
Riley
Fontanet
State
I
Game
shots
taken
1
2
0
a
a
0
0
a
a
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
Total
shots
taken
a
0
a
a
1
1
3
3
7
10
10
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
22
23
25
25
28
34
Total
shots
made
0
a
a
a
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
~.Jotal
percentage
.000
.000
.000
.000
1.000
1.000
.333
.333
.143
.500
.300
.176
.176
.176
.167
.167
.167
.167
.167
.167
.167
.167
.136
.130
.120
.120
.107
.088
121
TABLE XLIV
SHOT ACCUMULATIOlf STATISTICS
,FOR EDWARD. GREGSON
1936..1937
Games
Spencer'
Greencastle
Bicknell
Bedford
Alexandria
Garfield
State
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Brazil
Sullivan
w. Terre Haute.
Riley
Glenn
Bruceville
Farmersburg
!eh'boro
Plainville,
Princeton
B:r.-8Zi1
Washington
Boase
PetEJrsbu~g
0
0
0
.000
.000
.000
.000
1.000
.000
1.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.260
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
•000
.000
.400
.000
1.000
0
1
a
a
0
1
0
1
0
3
0
0
1
0
1
0
a
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
a
0
a
0
0
a
0
0
0
O.
~tate
4
6
.rtinaville
-
Game
percentage
3
~i.entQ
~
Game
shots
made
Riley
:J!'ontanet
.-
Game
shots
taken
0
1
a
0
0
0
0
()
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
Total
shots
taken
a
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
6
6
6
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
13
17
22
22
23
Total
shots
made
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
:3
2)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
b
6
Total
percentage
.000
.000
.000
.000
.600
.600
.667
.667
.333
.333
.333
.300
' .300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.~OO
.300
.300
.300
.300
.231, .
.176
.227 .
.227
.261
122
TABLE XLV
SHOT ACCUMULATION STATISTICS
FO~ RUSSELL WALTM~IER
1936-1937
Games
Spenoer
Greencastle
Bicknell
Bedford
Alexandria
Garfield
State
Bloomfield
Mitchell
Brazil
Sullivan
W. Terre Haute
Riley
Glenn
Bruceville
Farmersburg
Ashboro
Plainville
Princeton
Brazil
Washington
Bosse
Petersburg
Riley
Fontanet
State
Pitnento
Martinsville
-
,
,
:
-
\
I ::
Game
shots
taken
Game
shots
made
Game
percentage
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
.000
.000
.500
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
1.000
.000
.000
.000
a
3
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2·
0
1
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Total
shots
taken
0
0
2
3
3
3
3
3
5
b
b
8
8
8
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
12
12
13
16
16
18
Total
shots
made
Total
percentage
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
.000
.000
2
.bOO
.333
.333
.333
.333
.333
.200
.200
.200
.125
.125
.126
.100
.100
.100
.100
.~OO
.100
.100
.100
.083
.083.
.154
.126
.12b
.111
APPENDIX B.
SUPPLEMENTARY CHARTS
,
.
124
r·.
.--------------------------~
•
• •x,
•
• • X •
••
•
eX
•
••
• •
x
x : .\ •
• •
x
.X·
•
•
•
x
•
•
•
.
• i
\
.
••
• I:X
"
"
X
•• •
.x •
•
•
••
•
x •
~---.1
.//;'
x •
•
...
• • ••
• •
••
\ \,
I
'
::
I
•
x •
•
,
• •
•
•
•
x
....
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
"
.........
_._._---------
/
\. '.
/
./
CHART 37
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR ROBERT LADSON
1934-1936
x
1
~
I
I
•
x
•
•
•
•
X
,x
X
•
•
• ••
•
.. -:7---xf~-·
•
•
•
X
X
•
•
X
X
•
)-
•
, "
,i
X
I
•
;
Xx•
-
•
""~
•
•
•
."
•
•
,
,
·
/'
.....
i
••
•
"'-... ..---..-- ....
X
X
•
•
X
•
•
••
•
•
•
•
X
I
I
/
!
\
,,·
\
_
.... ..
II
,
•
•
I
•
•
\
1'-......."
I
' "'. ,
I
••
•
•
I
X
X
•
•
,_. ~ ...........
""',
•
j
•
•
•
•
,r'/
•
•
•
•
X
•
I
\
•
'\
X
X
X
•
•
1
, ;
•
"
1
•
X
X
•
\
,t
•
•
•
)
i
. - --"1
/
\
.I
..... ~ -.......
."
,i
CHART 38
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR BOYD CLIMER
1934-1~35
---I
~- t'~:C~!~~:~F-:-.
",x, -x'x ' x,
' •• ' i
.x··,·x
• .x
••
•
•
x
•
•
.
r
x. x
Ix
,
:.
/ j
i
i
!
"
i1
x . !I
X
.,."
.'
x
'.
,
:.
X
\
i
X '
!
,
•
i
•
•
•
,
X
X
X
•
•
•
•
.., ".
:
x
,
'
,
~ . 1,,~
-. - - -
,
•
•
"
,
(
•
X,..,
'x
I\'
,
,
x
•
X
•
•
•
•
I
I
I
I
;
I
I
I
I
\.
L
I
'.
"-- _..
..-"
./
.~-'-~"
_
CHART 39
CUlWLATED SHOT CHART
FOR LLOYD JULIAN
1934-1936
I
!
__I
~--~----_._-_
x
•
.x x
•
••
•
•
• •
•
•
'x x
• •
I
•
•
.x:I
)
/'
,..
r!
x
• •
•• •
'.
•
X
•
-, •
" '-
•
X
,1
,
• "- \
X
"
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
• •
X
••
•
• • • •
•
•
• •• • • •
•
•
•
•
•
• •
• •
X
•
/
,,
./
•
•
!
•
•
•
•
•
I
....."--......... ...--~ ....
• x
•
~
•
X
•
. . x·-
•
•
•x
•
•
•
•
/
\
•
•
• •
I
• •
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
• •
I
•
•
•
.
• ••
•
•
X
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
• •
•
• x
•
•
•
",.._..._.a-:-... 04 ...... :;.
".,.
X /
/
•
'x
"
"
,
•
I
\
r-·''-· \
!
:
";
\
'.
..
~-
'.
__I.
/
,
I
.'/
"
............__ . __ . .-,.1
CHART 40
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR FRANK KELLEY
1934-1935
128
....,.------0·1-----------'---------
xxi
•
• X X
•
•
•
•
• X
t
•
x
•
•
•
••
•
•
•
I
..
J
)
!
•
• •
:
x
•
•
•
I
•
I
•
• •
•
x
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
x
•
/
;/
....···-·~ . . . i..·~;.'"
,.-
•
• X
•
• •
•
",
......
'.
!
/.,-.-...."
;
i
,
~.
)
.
;'
\
/
.............
L
•
•
,
x
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
'\
x
x
•
• •
\
•
•
•
•
•
• • •
•
•
•
•
•
•
••
• •
••
,~.
•
x
X
X
•I
.
•
X •
.--"
.-
_
CHART 41
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR WOODROW WEY
1934 ...1935
•
129
~-------_·
__
·_-·---'·-----l~··---·-
I'
~.X~
.X.
•
X·'• • X-rI
•
X.
•
•
.'
•
I~
•
x
.!..
X·
•
,
X
•
x
•
•
•• •
•
x
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
••
• •
•
••
•
•
•
X
•
•
I
•
•
•
I
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
•
.
x
•
•
\'---~_.
,,
;'
/
CHART 42
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR GORDON MCLAUGHLIN
1934-1935'
•
•
X
•
\.
•
•
•
•
•
•
/
I
•
••
/
;::
• •
•
•
•
•
;'
•
.
•
I
X
X
•
•
•
x
•
•
'\
•
• •
,I
•
•
•
•
•
I
x
"
I
x
•
•
i
\
..
•
•
•
/
•
x
I' •
.)_-X.~.;"
...._/,,/
•
•
x •
IX" X·~'
•
I
•
~~~
'.
•
•
•
•
•
__._------
130
---;------
• •
'x
• x
•
'Xx • • •
•
x
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
.'
I
•
•
..-
,~
"
i
,
\
'\
•"
{
X
::
\
x
i
,I
. . .,
•
•
\
•
"
X
,
•
•
--.. _.--/
i
I
•
•
v/·
X
••
...
•
•
•
•
•
x
•
•
•
•
•
//"""."_~-4a"_"... ",,,,
"'-.
/
/
"
"
\_-~--_.
J
;
.. 1--, ... •
\.
/
......
- •.....
,.'
"
_
CHART 43
CIDvIDLATED SHOT CHART
FOR VICTOR ALDRIDGE
1934...1936
•
•
•
"
•
•
X
X
•
L.
•
•
•
•
x
•
•
•
!
II
Ii
I
------.- ._/
I
131
._---...
_._~
•
•
•
I•
•
•
•
•
,.
I
,
,"
- _. -
~~
~
•
•j
"-,
\
I
'\
X
I
:~
•
•
j
I
X
"".......
•
'---
,I
._-
/
••
......./"
•
•
•
•
•
I
Ii
I
._------.- ..
;'
\.
I
~_ _-
I
.'
--
CHART 44
CUllilliLATED SHOT CHART
FOR WILSON VlEY
1934-193b
I
_/
132
--'-------1---.--
••
I
I
x
x
i
I, •
i
! •
-
•X
•
- .. , i
"- ,
,,
\
i
\!
!
I
i
\
""" ...
,."---.,
i
,/
".,,""
~.-----
/--'--""
I
- ; -_ _l
~
"
_ _ _ _ _ _...._.nl
\
I
)
;
\.
/
"
i
_
CHART 45
CU11ULATED SHOT CHART
FOR ROBERT COLWELL
1934 ..1936
133
·--------------.x..,j. . .. ----1-:,-------•
•
•
i
..
I
x
"", ,
i
\
•
'\
I
,i
I
I
•
x
•
•
•
•
•
•
x
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
!
I
;
. I
I
,
i
.- ---I
)
I
\.
--'
'.
'-
-'-- .........
.-.I
"
CHART 46
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR GEORGE BLOCKSOM
1934-1930
134
••
• •
• •
•
•
• •
•
••,
• X.
,]IX'
X
••
x.
••
, .xxx
• • '·x· • ....
~ YX,~
•
•
~ S·
• •
·X •
• x •
•• t •• x: x.J.. :- .~L'
". •
.,
or.
x· ~
• •• • •
x
•
•
•
-.
•
x..
•
•• • • •
'
•
'.
.
.
·
x
I
"1
Xx
, • • •• • ••• , x -~ x
-A
·.x ! .'•• •• •
••• • ••••• ,.. x·x
• •
.Ix. •x•••
•
•
••
•
•
•• x
:
. .
• ••
,
..
.....
• • • • •• •
•• • •
• x.
•
•
, X' ,
• ,
,
•
•
" y... "-
x%/......-.--,1
•
etA>
...'
7'
•
.. X~ / / .
x: •••
•• -:.
"X ~
\\ ' . X
\ .' ,
•
•
•
.
•
, •
•
\"x.
~,~# ~
X
X
••
•
•
•
,
,
•
• , ,
• , • • •
•
•
•
•
.
x
• •
•
•
v""-
...
• •
•
• •
•
;
•. ; X
X ,/
•
•
'. \
. . . . ' - - •.
-,
'..
• • ./
'-...
• •
X
• •• • X \ ' \ .
( " x'
•
•
• ,
• " ••• )tx. , , •
x:
,
.'
, •
X t •
•
,• ••
•
, • •
,
X
·
.
.x: ..
•
• •
•
•
•
,
•
•
•
•
•
,I
,
j
1!
I
,,
)
~l.. ••
.........
L._ _
~
-- '-'1I
_-_
• ,.'
I
/
....:.. . .- ..-,,,
.
_
CHART 47
CU11ULATED SHOT CHART
FOR GORDON MCLAUGHLIN
1935-1936
13b
•
:'f.• .x
•
•
•
X
• •
•
•
x ••
•
•
x
•
•
•
•
•
•
I
~
X
,
f X.
\
•
•
X
•
•
...
•
X
•
\
•
j
•
X
,,
- _.........-"~./
•
•
•
•
•
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
'"
'
I
t
CHART 48
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR VICTOR ALDRIDGE
•
•
•
•
\.
193b-1936
•
•
\
..
•
•
•
)
~:_-
•
•
•
•
.,.... ""-
X
•
•
•
:x •
•
X
•
•
•
·./
•
X
/
• II
•
:x
•
•
'\
I
•
•
•
I
•
x
•
• •
•.''-..-----
•
•
•
•.x
i
x
.x . . . . ., X
•
'.
••
•
-X-,
• •• •
,
1
X
I
.
..
I'
.
X
.~
/
•
•
•
I'
• '•
•
· .1·
•
I.
X
•
• •
••
I:
X
• •
•
•
· ....x
•
•
• •
, :1 • • •
x'i
• •
•
x
··
, ••
••
•
x.
•
•
""X •
• x·
x • x x
I
,I
136
•
•
•• •
•
•
•
•
•
I,
\
•
•• •
x
•
X
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
\
"'-
•
x.
I
• •
•
• X• • X.
•
X
/'
•
/'
/ ............, .
~.
.,- .
"
•
•
•
• •
\
Ii
\
- - - - - - - - - - --j
I
/
,--_
•
•
j
'
)
..... _.......
'-_ _....-
x
•
I
\\\
\
"
•
•
,I
i
........
/
,i
•
•
I
------- "'-,.
.-..
I
•
• 'x
• •• •
"
•
• x. X
••
•
•
•
•X • •
•
I
•
'
• •j
!
• •
•
•
\
I
• •
•
••
"\
•
•
•
••
•
••
••
•
•
-t'"
•
•
••
.v,:
"'··x··
•
•
•
X.·X
,.... .x i .
' • ·x·
[ ••• ·x
•
• X
•• •
•
X
:xi
Ii
,
r X _.•
~~ ~
•
•
•
•
• • ••
.../ • • • • •
•• 'x
•
x
I
•
x
•
xi: .. x.
x
•
.Xx. x.
••
•
•
~.
x
•
•
..:x.,-.---------------_._-------:x.!.X..
·
x
·x·
··:X ••
•
-
I
I
J
~
CHART 49
CilliULATED SHOT CHART
~'OR WOODROW WEY
193b-1936
"
n
I'
I
137
.XXX.• ..•
-:------~-----
•
•
•
•
•
X
•
"
•
•
•
•
• •
•
•
• •
•
•
..
I
) - - I,
,
•
I
t
,
•
•
I
• •• •
X
\
•
\
•
• • x!·
, .,
"
•
•
X
•
•
•
••
X
•
•
.........""-- .~
•
•
X
•
•• •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•• •
•
,/
....-""----~
I
I
I
,
•
I
I
•
•
I
!
I
I
•
• •
X
I
••
•
• •
i
•
•
• •
X
•
•
I
I
•
•
•
•
I
I
I
!
I
"'
/
i
I
Ii
•
• •
•
X X
X
X
i
•
•
•X
I
•
•
•
•
•
/ _........-.:.....-............!'; ........,.
/
•
.1
I
\
•
•
•
I
I
•
•
•
I •
• • "-, •
I
X
X
•
•
•
•
•
I,
i
\
-------_.,
I
I
I
j
"1--. •• --
'.
I_ _.......-
I
f
/
"-..
,
i
•
CHART 60
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR KEUNETH VOGEL
1930-1936
I
I
J
r,I I'
rI
138
•
•
•
• .'•
x
• ••
• ••
•
•
[
\
"
\"..
•
•
• •
•
•
\.....
'-.
x
•
----.-_.---
\
•
, •• •
X
':
,
•
• ••
,
•
I,
,I
/
./
X
•
•
•
•
J;
,/
•
•
• •
."
.·
II'
•
•
•
•
. .. . .
x /':
•
,
x
.!".,
/"
/
•
•
•
",1 - - -
•
•
., ..
• • •
• •
, x
x
•
•
•
II
I
X
•
•
i
I
I
!i
•
I
,,!
I
/
I
__ -"".
I
I - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - . : . . . ! ·_.-"IJk-..---"---------.------_- ...../
/
;
.. L.... __ •
\,
i
,/
.,....
'.
'--_ ....
..-.'
/
._-.......------.....-------------------------CHART 51
CUMtJI,ATED SHOT CHART
FOR WILSON WEY
1936-1936
I
I
I
139
,
I..
x
I
II'
•
II
•
,1
!
•
1
j
•
X
•
x ••
•
I
;~
Ii
..
.'
"•
. , X· •
,I
.
/
x
.
I
i
·x.
•
• xI
"I
.... -
...
•
•
:i: ·X.,
••
I
!
",i -
•
i
·
··~-·lfJf~~._.~:~;--:• :• ·i
X
.,]i.
." · ·
· •
•
X
•
• •
•
1
.',_ x
•
-'.\
•
\
i
i
i,,
/
I
I
Jl
I
!
II
II
I
i
/
.-----------.----.-----.- "1
;
·l_•.•• •
1
,I
L_--,-
_
-------------------------CHART b2
SHOT CHART
FOR ROBERT COLVffiLL
C~ruLATED
1936-19~6
140
-------------_._--:------~.--
x •
x
x
•
x
•
•
•
I
.,1 - - -
I
.!
;~.
...
' '.
...
/
•
\
\.
I
•
•
t
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
x
,I
I
!
I
i
i
I
I
-----····1
~l_.,
•• --
/
\.
./
"
""--
--_ __ ..
..
_ _ _ ~-._ . _ - - - - - - -
CHART 03
•
SHOT CHART
FOR RAROLD HESS
C~mLATED
1936-1936
".
i
Ii
,
I
1
141
•
x
•
I,
X
"-I'~~l-;----,
: IX:~
: I, - .
•
x
I
/
. .J -
"'- ,
,.I
/
•
\
\,
•
•
•
•
,
I
i
II
Ii
/.-, -"',
,
\I
•
.,
.
\
_..:..
)
._
- - - - _ .... ,i
;'
/
.',
-------------------.---------CHART 54
SHOT CHART
FOR OTTO DUENWEG
C~ruLATED
1936-1936
,.'
142
--,----~-
••
••
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
..
•
,/
x
/
•
•
/-
,I/
I
J
!
/'
. -"-""--......:~ .."
/
i
~
..
"
"
,
-...-....
\
\
\..\
.
i
I
I
/
~
._--__._ ..1
L•. ••. ,
/
/
j
!
I
-- ..- .._I
._---- .._-----------
.......
...
CHART 66
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR. NELSON HAVILL
1936-1936
143
· x.'. ' :', x,..
'---'Y::x:~ij~i
• '.. ~T
.:!
x"
. ,x.
. , • • • • X ••• X
:J:.JCf:.
•....
X: X"
·," ,· '.,
X·'··X,··· "
• 'X',
f
x· .x. •••
I
:
I
I
I·i
I
I
I
I
•
•.
I
I
:
'X
• x
•
'.
•
, r- • ' .
X
.
X
• % • •
, . , x, X.• "
X
X
..•. • · ...•
x' X ' .
"
• X..·X
x,·
.
XX
'
~.
.'.
xx.
"-' . .
X,.'
'. • • • • •
.. .. x..'.··
•
•
X.
'.
'"
I •
: • "X
'x .j
~
j
x, "
'''-,
)t!.,....
X "
:
?,
X
.' "
:
X
'/'2:
•
'x
'x
·x···· ,
"
X
·, ....·· . / , ..·x.. \\
.
.'
. .
••
•
•
"
•
•
•
x.
•
•
•
x
•
•
•
,
•
•
\
".- .....,.
1------------------'-----0
I
.\
\
)
I
/
'.
CHART b6
CUUULATED SHOT CHART
FOR. GORDON MCLAUGHLIN
1936-1937
•
•
X
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
x
•
•
( .' ':'.,
•••
• • ••
·X ·X' •
• X
x·
., •
x
.' ·Xx •
X
• .x • •
•
,
•
•• x
x
•
• ••• • x
• .X
•
•
X
X •
•••••
:x:
•
: ·Xx •
•
X
•
•
• •
". • •
x
x
•
• •
,
X •
•
•
x•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
• •
• •
•
•
•
•
144
:il: >_.~:.x;:~i~~f' :~i: -:-
• • ·X·X.
X'.X.
x
• •
•e•
•
•X
e
•
X
e..
..
• • :
•
••
e e
• e e •e
• •• e
••
x.
e,.
I
I
••
•
•
""',
", '---.
•
_._~.-J-
X
•
I
•
X
i
I
••
•••
xX.
X
•
•
•
• •
•
•
eX
X
•
..
• •• •• •
• •
••
• •
•
",/
•
e
X
I
I
e
I
{
•
X
•
•
•
•
t
•• • ·x iI
• • I
e•
/
•
e
X
•
'
•
·x
•
X
.ex.
•
'\
•
•
•
•
e
\
••
•
X
••
",
• eX..
• • x
•
•
xx·
x. eX
• •X• • •
•
•
X
·•
Ixe •
.A·X
i
•
•
e
;
_ e.
I
/~X1.x ~.:
" ~ e·x
'.;_
i
X
e
•• •
x • • •x
l.i·.*
: i.·
e
•
•
.:
x
.
•
I •••
•••
•
X
X.
e
•
e.
·x • e
•
• x:J
•
•
•
•
••
e
•
•• e
•• •
e
• e
x
• ..
• e
x
•
e
••
•
· ..
••• x
1
I
~
X
•
· •. I
• •X X • •• •
• •
• •• •
X
X
. . . . I'
•
e
I
I
.- ---/
I
t
/
'-
-"-_...• -. -
CHART 6'1
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR VICTOR ALDRIDGE
1936-1937
14b
•
I•
•
•
I
.
..
• ••
I
I
.'
•
I•
• ••
••
• •
•
.. . ...
..~ x I x.x :
•
•
I ·
x
•
•
•
x
,
•
• • • •••
•
·• • .
. • • ...
•
•
II
...-......- , !
x
••
•
'\
•
•
x
••
•
_..
~-'-'-.-
f
/
•
/---
• •
x
I
•
/
...........
•
•
". ,
'.
•
•
.....- ... _- ...
•
•
•
I
I
..
•
i
\
I
J
/
"
_
CHART 68
CULIDLATED SHOT CHART
FOR ELVIN MAHAN
1936-1937
"
•
\
.I
L
•
• •• • x
•
x
•
"
.......
• ••
'"
-~.
i
.,
•
•
i
x
x •
•
•
\
,
t
•
•
x
•••
' . :.
••
"-.,
•
•
.
. .
•
• •• • •
• •
•
~~
,,
•
• •
!.
i-.----.- - - - - - - -
(
•
x• •
•
f.J:j'.•
~m
x x. f:.A x. .._
~
• x.
••
x
•
•
•
•
I
•
-.-x-~
I
146
,
'~,i,~~z:ft~: "~-
,
•
, ,
x
• ,
T
"'~xi~·til·rla,:",
,.' ~t ·~.t x,'~ x-"
, , T: '
,
,
~
,ax.,.
,X,X"
'1' , : : ' •
','
r:,"x'
I
/~
•
•
_.
X'
•
•
•,
, x•
..
I
"
x,,
... , !:
•
i
\
•
•
•
• •
• ,
i
•
x
: =J:x:
:x
.-.
~
,
I'
:
Ie
•
I
'x':,-~
.',
,
,
j
I
•
/
•
/.,.----;.
;
\
/
--------
--~~l .•.••
I
-
\
---------1
/
i
I
..... "'--._...-.L
_
I
-------_._---CHART 69
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR HAROLD HESS
1936-193'1
I
J
147
,
,
• , • , •
•
X
,
.----,-x~;-··--·
,
••
•
•,x'x
, *,
•
•
,
,
•
•
•
•
\
X
.
"
,
X
X
•
,
,
•
•
\
X
/
•
i
•
./
-.,.~_
... -""'"
.'
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
,
,I
X.
X
•
•
\
X
"-
•
•
,
X
"
X
"
'.
•
•
.1
•
•
,
•
,
-,
.'
."
, ,•
x
_e to
)
,
I
• •
• ,"
:It.
•
x·
, x
•
,
..
, l!
Qt.
•
•
•
/-_
•
.. .-:-- ..........
/'
"
/
"',
/
\
I
)
. -----------..... I
I
\.
I
'.
CHART 60
CU1WLATED SHOT ~HART
FOR CLIFFORD FORSYTH
1936..1937
148
,
x
•
.~7:x"V"~.
-:--:-• -.
x·
•
..
• •
•
•
• •
.. x···
•
••••
•
..:.
•
•
•
•
•
I
I
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
•• .x
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
/ -....-~ ..........:,
•
•
x •
•
• •
;'
•
•
j
• • • ••
•
•
X
•
• •
x
x
•
• •
•
•
•
••
I
•
•
i
• •
•
•
• x•
\
•
•• •
.
/
I
x
• x
• •
•
•
•
·
•
-,0.,.,
"
/
\
/
---_._---
)
'L•.•• ·•
\
;'
I
.'
--)
I
i
,---_ __
-------------------_._-- -------------- I
.. .
CHART 61
SHOT CHART
FOR HAROLD BOWSHER
cm~ULATED
1~36-1937
149
.• x
--------·---;-I.-x:l.I~··
•
•
•
• x
•
•
•
•
• I
• •
x
•
~
,,/
..
.. -X- -
;'
..
I
/
•
I
: X
•
\
•
•
•
•
•
i
_.".,
,
\
•
x
\
•
•
•
x
•
•
•
•
x
•
•
•
•
--,---_./
I
)
/
.. L ..•• ·•·
\
'. "
'- .•..
_.......
/
Ii
I
I
'----------
-----------_.1
CHART 62
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR JAMES MCKINNEY
1936-1937
,1DO
__
---
._....,.._._--~_.
•
•
•• ••
•
•
x
••
•
.. i -
•
,,r,.,i
I
•
.. x ..
• ••
•
•
._--_._------~
•
,
•
/
t
•
•
/
•
•
•
•
x
•
,I
i
!I
I
I
i
/---... ...
I---------------'----{
\
/
~
l .... _-
\.
L.
__1
;'
/
.
I
i
_
____________ 1
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
FOR JOHN HART
1936.,.1957
:",~
I
'"
I
CHART 63
t
_
...
Jb1
---------_..
_-_
...
_-.-_._-~.
__
.
•
•
•
•
!
•
11
,I.
/'
I
,.
I
..J -
•
"
i
'.
•
\
"
f
•
i
• •
...
,
/.
""
,-
•
•
"--- .... .. ~_ ..
/
,-
I
v·
/'
x
•
•
'.
\.
/
/
•
I
/
"
CHART 64
CUMU;L.ATED SHOT CHART
FOR EDWARD GREGSON
1936-193'1
•
I
162
-------_._-----,--'-- ----------_._--••
• •
X
•
•
•
•
•
•
I
~
•
~
x
).-
4
.;,,/
I'
/
II(!
•
Ii
"
I
I
I
•
•
i
I
I
I
•
(
I
I
i
i
~
I
i
I
......--.. _.........-.--'-:-.~.
•
I
//;~
I
.,. . ",
I
I!
\
l-----------------i'-_-:....{_-.il\t....----+-__- - - - - - - _ .. --/
',i
/
I
/---"'.
1-
.\
I
)
.
"
"'L.. .• ~ •
!
"
'--_..__.. -.,-
/
!
/
CHART 66
CUMULATED SHOT CHART
/1'
.'.
FOR RUSSELL WALTA11IER
1'336-1'337
. ::
:~
~
"
})
>
"""
"
}
>'