Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assumption of mass action Murad Banaji SIAM Life Sciences, San Diego, 9th August 2012 Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Outline 1. Some background 2. Some examples 3. Conclusions Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Why not assume mass-action? ◮ A quote from Wikipedia: “In more complex environments, where bound particles may be prevented from disassociation by their surroundings, or diffusion is slow or anomalous, the model of mass action does not always describe the behavior of the reaction kinetics accurately” ◮ We would like to know what effects approximations such as QSSA could have on allowed dynamics. Some of what can be said about CRNs actually arises from the weak law “more substrate ⇒ faster reactions”. Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Some possible behaviours global stability oscillation multistationarity persistence chaos local stability Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Reaction vectors and rate derivatives A B C A →B+C −1 1 1 reaction vector + 0 0 reaction rate derivatives Dv The final row vector means that we expect the reaction rate v to increase as [A] increases, but to be unaffected by [B] and [C]. I.e., ∂v > 0, ∂[A] ∂v = 0, ∂[B] Murad Banaji ∂v = 0. ∂[C] Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump DSR graph of an irreversible reaction A→ B+C A B C −1 1 1 − 0 0 −Dv T Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump DSR graph of an irreversible reaction A B C A→ B+C −1 1 1 − 0 0 −Dv T B C B A Murad Banaji C = + A B C A DSR graph Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump DSR graph of a reversible reaction A B C A⇋ B+C −1 1 1 − + + −Dv T B C B A Murad Banaji C = + A B C A DSR graph Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump DSR graphs A ⇋B+C A→B+C B C B C A DSR graph A DSR graph Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 A1 + A2 ⇋ B1 A2 + A3 ⇋ B2 A3 ⇋ 2A1 A3 ⇋ 2A1 A2 +A3 ⇋ B2 A1 +A2 ⇋ B1 Reaction networks: the stoichiometric matrix −1 0 2 −1 −1 0 0 −1 −1 1 0 0 0 1 0 stoichiometric matrix Γ Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Some important objects associated with a CRN Γ= A1 + A2 → B1 A2 + A3 ⇋ B2 A3 ⇋ 2A1 −1 0 2 −1 −1 0 0 −1 −1 1 0 0 0 1 0 − Dv T = A2 B1 − 0 + − − 0 0 − − 0 0 0 0 + 0 B2 GΓ,−Dv T = A1 Murad Banaji 2 A3 Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump DSR graph for a network A1 + A2 → B1 A2 + A3 ⇋ B2 A3 ⇋ 2A1 A2 B1 A2 B2 A3 A1 A1 2 A3 Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump DSR graph for a network A1 + A2 → B1 A2 + A3 ⇋ B2 A3 ⇋ 2A1 A2 B1 A2 B2 A3 A1 A1 2 A3 Murad Banaji A2 B1 A1 2 B2 A3 Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Dynamical systems from CRNs rate of reaction j vj (x) ẋi = Γij vj (x) rate of production of reactant i by reaction j X rate of production of reactant i = the sum of its rates of production in each reaction. Γij vj (x) j So CRNs give dynamical systems of the form: ẋ = Γ v (x) reactant concentrations The Jacobian has a natural factorisation reaction rates J(x) = Γ Dv (x) stoichiometric matrix Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Stoichiometry classes Consider the CRN: ẋ = Γ v (x). The vector field lies in Im Γ, the image of Γ: Thus all evolution takes place on invariant affine subspaces, parallel to Im Γ. The intersections of these sets with the nonnegative orthant are termed stoichiometry classes. These are termed nontrivial if they intersect the interior of the nonnegative orthant. Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Jacobian matrices of CRNs A lot of interesting claims follow from examination of these alone. For example we might be able to show that for particular Γ and all allowed rate derivatives −J(x) = −ΓDv (x): ◮ is nonsingular (no saddle-node bifurcations) ◮ is a P-matrix (no multistationarity) ◮ cannot have imaginary eigenvalues (no Hopf bifurcations) ◮ is stable, and hence D-stable (local stability of all equilibria). [are there also global implications?] ◮ is “K -quasipositive” for some order cone K (monotonicity of the local semiflow) Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Questions in matrix theory “B ∈ Q(A)” will mean “B is in the qualitative class of A” (“B has the same dimensions and sign pattern as A”). How do we characterise matrices A such that for each B ∈ Q(A): ◮ AB T is nonsingular? ◮ AB T is in (the closure of) the P-matrices? ◮ AB T is positive (semi)stable? ◮ AB T has no pair of imaginary eigenvalues? ◮ There exists a factorisation A = A1 A2 , a scalar α(B) and a matrix C satisfying A1 C = 0 such that A2 BA1 + α(B)I + C is nonnegative? Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Some examples Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Example (1): a Hurwitz Jacobian matrix Consider the chemical reaction network A ⇋ B + D, B ⇋ C ⇋ D ⇋ E A ⇋ ∅, B ⇋ ∅, C ⇋ ∅, D ⇋ ∅, E ⇋ ∅ with stoichiometric matrix Γ= 1 1 0 1 0 0 −1 1 0 0 0 0 −1 1 0 0 0 0 −1 1 −1 0 0 0 0 0 −1 0 0 0 0 0 −1 0 0 0 0 0 −1 0 0 0 0 0 −1 ΓDv is Hurwitz for all Dv ∈ Q(−ΓT ). This can be proved without explicitly checking the Routh-Hurwitz conditions. Saddle-node and Hopf bifurcations cannot occur, and all equilibria are locally stable. Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Examples (2): ruling out stable oscillation A1 + A2 ⇋ B1 A2 + A3 ⇋ B2 A3 + A4 ⇋ B3 A4 + A5 ⇋ B4 A5 ⇋ 2A1 A3 B2 B3 A2 A4 B1 B4 A1 2 A5 The system cannot have a nontrivial attracting periodic orbit. This is proved by showing that the system restricted to any stoichiometry class is monotone. Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Examples (3): ruling out multistationarity P1 E1 S1 P2 E 1S1S2 E 1S1 E2 S2 E 2S2S3 E 2S2 2 E 4S4 S4 E4 E 3S3 E 3S3S4 S3 E3 P3 The system (from Craciun et. al. PNAS 103(23):8697–8702, 2006) does not allow multiple positive nondegenerate equilibria (MPNE). Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Another example (partial TCA cycle model) OAA CIT MAL FUM ISOC NADH αKG ∞ Suc SCoA Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Example (4) Consider the following system of 4 reactions on 5 chemicals: A ⇋ B + C, C +D ⇋A C +E ⇋A B ⇋ D, with the DSR graph: C D E A B All orbits on each nontrivial stoichiometry class converge to a unique (positive) equilibrium. Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Proving global stability 1. nontrivial stoichiometry classes intersect only repelling faces of the nonnegative orthant (via a calculation on Γ) 2. the local semiflow is monotone and in fact strongly monotone in the interior (via examination of Γ and the DSR graph) 3. the partial order satisfies certain additional geometrical constraints All this allow us to construct a strict Liapunov function on the relative interior of each nontrivial stoichiometry class. Each such class contains exactly one equilibrium which attracts the whole stoichiometry class. Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Where did the results come from? Computations or observations on Γ (the constant stoichiometric matrix) and Dv (the rate derivatives) and/or DSR graphs GΓ,−Dv T ... We were naturally led to questions such as ◮ Does Γ admit a certain factorisation? ◮ Do submatrices of Γ satisfy certain conditions? ◮ What can we say about ker ΓT and ker Γ? ◮ Is GΓ,−Dv T strongly connected? ◮ What can we say about cycles in GΓ,−Dv T ? Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Concluding remarks ◮ Several results on CRNs are consequences of the weak law “more substrate ⇒ faster reactions” rather than the mass-action (MA) law. ◮ However many claims about CRNs with mass action probably fail when MA is suspended. ◮ Thus some constructions in classical CRNT appear to be fundamentally “algebraic”, while in others, the algebra hides more fundamental underlying geometric constraints. Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Concluding remarks Some guesses: ◮ The class of persistent CRNs with MA is probably much larger than that of persistent CRNs without MA. ◮ The class of globally stable CRNs with MA is probably much larger than that of globally stable CRNs with MA. Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Collaborations Stephen Baigent (UCL) Pete Donnell (Portsmouth) Gheorghe Craciun (Wisconsin) Casian Pantea (Imperial) David Angeli (Imperial) Janusz Mierczyński (Wroclaw) Carrie Rutherford (London South Bank) Andrew Burbanks (Portsmouth) Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Some relevant publications (1) ◮ (with P. Donnell and S. Baigent) P matrix properties, injectivity and stability in chemical reaction systems, SIAM J Appl Math, 67(6) (2007), 1523-1547 ◮ Monotonicity in chemical reaction systems, Dynamical Systems 24(1) (2009) 1-30 ◮ (with G. Craciun) Graph-theoretic criteria for injectivity and unique equilibria in general chemical reaction systems, Adv Appl Math, 44 (2010) 168-184 ◮ (with G. Craciun) Graph-theoretic approaches to injectivity and multiple equilibria in systems of interacting elements, Comm Math Sci, 7(4) (2009) 867-900 ◮ (with D. Angeli) Convergence in strongly monotone systems with an increasing first integral, SIAM J Math Anal, 42(1) (2010) 334-353 Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump Some relevant publications (2) ◮ Graph-theoretic conditions for injectivity of functions on rectangular domains, J Math Anal Appl, 370 (2010) 302-311 ◮ (with C. Rutherford) P-matrices and signed digraphs, Discrete Math 311 (4) (2011) 289-294 ◮ (with J. Mierczyński) Global convergence in systems of differential equations arising from chemical reaction networks, [preprint on arXiv at http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.1716] ◮ (with A. Burbanks), A graph-theoretic condition for irreducibility of a set of cone preserving matrices, [preprint on arXiv at http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.1653]. Murad Banaji Some results on chemical reaction networks without the assump
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz