Work package 2
Communication activities
PP: City municipality Kranj
Author: Primož Skrt
Place and date: Kranj, March 2012
Project partner: City municipality Kranj
Application form

What should be allready done?
◦
◦
◦
◦

Communication plan
Stakeholders list
Communication products
Internet platform
What was done?
◦
◦
◦
◦
Communication plan
Stakeholders list (partly)
Communication products (partly)
Internet platform ??
Project partner: City municipality Kranj
Communication plan





Base document for internal and external communication
Finished in second period (october 2011)
Uploaded on our internal platform
Theoretical document, but also base for practical work
Short description
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
Internal and external communication
Methodology of communication
Target groups
Responsabilities of all partners (!!!!)
Stakeholders list
Project partner: City municipality Kranj
Communication products-logo

Delay in progress acording to application form
◦ Internal problems of PP



Start of work in october 2011
Final version in december 2011
Basics ideas
◦ Simple logo
◦ “Telling story“ of the project
◦ Unique logo
Project partner:
Communication products-logo

FIRST EXAMPLES:
Project partner: City municipality Kranj
Communication products-logo

Most voted green one  wish of „story“

Letter A as doorrepresenting accesibility towards CV
Group of peoplerepresenting target groups of Clear
project

Project partner: City municipality Kranj
Communication products-logo

FINAL VERSIONS
◦ Only one that can be used
◦ No changes permited
◦ General version:
◦ Version for not official documents:
◦ Vector version for designers.
Project partner: City municipality Kranj
Communication products-other

Graphic design, e-cards, brochures, internet page, etc
◦ Delay in progress
◦ So far power point template
◦ And graphic design for internet page
 www.clear-see-eu
◦ In progress:
 E-cards for inviting on events, promotion of the projects
 Brochures for concrete WP products
 More information from partners responsible for WP (??)
Project partner: City municipality Kranj
Communication activities

EXTERNAL COMMUNICATION
◦ Depending on activities
◦ So far not much activities has been made on the project, though the
external communication is weak
◦ We need to start promoting !!!!
 Comments of PP?
◦ Internet page!

INTERNAL COMMUNICATION
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
Very weak
Urgent need to make this better
Involvment and participation of all partners
E-mailing is not enough
More often web conferences and reporting of the activities made
Project partner: City municipality Kranj
WP2: Conclusion

COMMUNICATION PLAN
 Done; however is just theoretical base of communication

COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS
 Delay of progress

EXTERNAL COMMUNICATION
 Could and should be better but due to not many activities is hard to promote
a project

INTERNAL COMMUNICATION
 Worst part of WP2
 MUST!!!!! be better, not only due to WP but of progress of the project as a
whole
 RESPONSABILITY OF ALL PARTNERS!!!!
Project partner: City municipality Kranj