Chapter 9 Capital Utilization and Unemployment Capital Input Why relaxing the assumption on the inelastic supply of capital? Empirical evidence: the cyclical behavior of capital utilization rate. How do we relax the assumption? Introducing the capital utilization rate . Y AF ( K , L) affects the depreciation rate, hence the return to capital. Capital Input The demand for capital service w d R d d AF ( K ) , L L ( K ) d P P P Replacing K by K: capital services. R/P is the real return on K. demand curve for K is downward sloping. A positive shock shifts the demand curve to the right. The Capital Input The demand for capital services. Capital Input The supply of capital services Machines wear out faster if used more intensively. ( ) K is invariable in the short run. Owners choose to maximize the net income from supplying capital services. R R K ( ) K ( ) K P P This is equivalent to maximize the net real return from owning capital. Capital Input The supply curve of capital services is upward sloping. Capital Input The market of capital services clears. Capital Input New results A positive real shock increases current capital utilization rate and the quantity of capital services. Higher capital utilization rate also contributes to higher real GDP. Despite the higher depreciation rate, the interest rate increases. R r ( ) P Empirical Evidence The cyclical behavior of capacity utilization. Unemployment Why relaxing the assumption on full employment? Determinants of total hours worked: Labor force: explained; Hours worked per worker: explained; Employment rate: unexplained. Determinants of employment: Labor force: explained; Employment rate: unexplained. Unemployment Basic concepts Labor force: the number of persons who offer themselves for work. Employment: number of persons with jobs. employment rate=1-u employment=labor force(1-u) total hours worked=employment hours worked per worker Empirical Evidence The labor force is relatively stable. Empirical Evidence The employment rate is highly procyclical. Empirical Evidence Hours worked per worker is procyclical. Empirical Evidence Importance of three determinants: The employment rate is more important than hours worked per worker; Hours worked per worker is more important than the labor force. What we have explained: fluctuations in the labor force and hours worked per worker. What we need explain: fluctuations in the unemployment rate. A Model of Job Finding A distribution of wage offers. Job search Pros: future jobs with higher wage; Cons: low income from being unemployed . Decision rule Reservation real wage (w/P)’ w/P>(w/P)’: accept the current offer; w/P<(w/P)’: keep on searching. A Model of Job Finding A Model of Job Finding Implications Searching explains unemployment. Higher raises the reservation wage. Lower job-finding rate; Longer expected duration of unemployment. Positive real shock shifts the distribution to the right. The reservation wage increases, but to a smaller extent; Higher job-finding rate; Shorter expected duration of unemployment. A Model of Job Finding Why does the reservation wage increase proportionally less than the wage offer? The real shock is not fully permanent. Still less even if the shock is permanent. Three scenarios: #1: the initial state; #2: the final state; #3: Both and the distribution are proportionally higher. 1 versus 3: the same job-finding rate; 2 versus 3: higher job-finding rate in #2. 2 versus 1: higher job-finding rate in #2. A Model of Job Finding Job separations and job findings Job-separation rate : number of job separation per month/employment The job-separation rate is barely cyclical. Job-finding rate : number of hires per month/unemployment The job-finding rate is procyclical. Dynamics of unemployment L=U-L A Model of Job Finding Natural unemployment rate U-L U 1 u U L 1 L U n Unemployment during economic fluctuations Unemployment adjusts gradually; Lags behind the economic cycle; Job creation is still large in recession.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz