PURE Communication questionnaire II for external stakeholders

PURE Communication questionnaire II for external stakeholders
1. Do you know what PURE project’s aims are?
Number of respondents: 9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
5
6
Yes
No
Open text answers: Yes
-
reduction of eutrophication
Reduction of Eutrophication in the Baltic Sea
2. Do you know which organisations are involved in PURE?
Number of respondents: 9
0
1
2
3
4
Yes
No
Open text answers: Yes
HELCOM
UBC EnvCom (Lead partner), John Nurminen Foundation (investment coordinator), HELCOM, Riga water,
Jurmala water, Brest Vodokanal, Szczecin Water company, Kohtla-Järve water company, Luebeck Sewage
Management, cities of Gdansk Mariehamn and
3. Have you ever visited PURE website (www.purebalticsea.eu)?
Number of respondents: 9
0
Yes
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
4. Have you read at least one PURE Newsletter?
Number of respondents: 9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Yes
No
5. How often have you visited PURE website (www.purebalticsea.eu)?
Number of respondents: 2
0
1
Once or twice
Several times a year
Monthly
More often
6. Have you visited any PURE partner organization?
Number of respondents: 9
0
Yes
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
7. Which PURE partner organization/s have you visited
Number of respondents: 2
0
1
2
UBC EnvCom
John Nurminen Foundation
HELCOM secretariat
Riga Water
Brest Vodokanal
Jurmala Water
ZWiK Szczecin
EBHL Lübeck
Järve Biopuhastus
City of Gdansk
Mariehamn town
8. Have you participated in PURE workshops?
Number of respondents: 9
0
1
2
3
4
5
Yes
No
9. In which PURE workshop/s have you participated?
Number of respondents: 1
6
7
8
0
1
October 2010 in Riga
September 2011 in Lübeck
10. Are you interested in PURE Final Conference in 16-18 October 2012 in Gdansk?
Number of respondents: 9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Yes
No
11. Are you interested in PURE Book of Good Practices on municipal sludge management in the
Baltic Sea region?
Number of respondents: 9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Yes
No
12. Are you interested in PURE BenchMark online data and benchmarking service for
municipalities and water companies in the Baltic Sea region?
Number of respondents: 9
0
Yes
No
1
2
3
4
5