From: Enhancement in Informational Masking
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55(4):1135-1147. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/09-0149)
Legend:
Thresholds for Experiment 2 are plotted as a function of ISI for PreM (circles) and PreSM (diamonds) conditions. The masker components were
harmonics of a randomly drawn fundamental frequency. The signal frequency was either the 5th harmonic of the randomly drawn fundamental
frequency (harm; filled symbols) or was mistuned relative to the 5th harmonic (mistuned; unfilled symbols). Thresholds for the no-precursor
baseline conditions are shown using solid and dashed lines for the harmonic and mistuned signals, respectively. For the results of individual
subjects, error bars indicate the upper or lower 68%
confidence
limit. (Bootstrap
estimates for the reliability of threshold estimates, as 68%
Copyright
© American
Speech-Languageconfidence
intervals,
were
estimated
using
1,000
simulated
thresholds.
Each
simulated
threshold was based on a linear fit to data drawn with
Date of download: 7/28/2017
Hearing Association
replacement from the original population of trials.) For the average results, the error bars indicate ±1 SEM.