Interconnecting electricity for Europe’s sustainable growth! TSO/DSO Workshop Meeting Panel #3: Markets and Regulatory Framework Pierre Bernard, CEO Friends of the Supergrid San Francisco, 13 April 2016 1 Friends of the Supergrid Europe’s largest industrial alliance for interconnections FOSG promotes the policy & regulatory framework required to enable an European Supergrid Representing the entire supply chain We are present in sectors that develop, install, own, operate and deliver Supergrid infrastructure & related technology. 1 million jobs > €200Billion annual turn-over Interconnecting electricity for Europe’s sustainable growth! 2 What is the Supergrid? What is the Supergrid? • SUPERGRID: Offshore wind Solar Hydro • key enabler of SOS • link between European cities, • move large amounts of including RES across Europe c power, What are the benefits? Integration of RES Secure electricity supply Efficient electricity market Export opportunities for European technology 3 Agenda ● 2 parts A. Let’s discuss this “Future Market Design”… B. (Future) New EC Market Design 4 Agenda A. Let’s discuss this “Future Market Design”… 5 TODAY: RES target + 27% of final energy consumption in the EU as a whole < 2030, BUT: … ENGIE: - 4.6B€ (-50%) RWE: - 170M€ (-75%) E-ON: -7.0B€ (- 65%) (source: Les Echos) 6 WHERE DO WE GO NOW …? 7 CHANGES… Reward flexibility RES revolution Storage technologies Smart cities Decentralised generation Prosumers Decarbonisation targets Europe needs to be energy independent EVERY market actor wants something different and NOW 8 But when it comes to change… 9 Let’s have a break and go backwards… 10 Do you remember the cost of…? Flat Screen 1999 $15,000 1995 AOL: 5h Base: $9.95, then $2,95/h NY => Rome: Coach $ 1955 3.046 2016 705 11 Cost of RES… 12 Facts - Cannot do without it… Climate change Security of supply > 60% dependent on NON-EU sources Permits 7 years () Weak Economy cost of equity… Difficult political consensus : 28 countries and more… Fast technological changes A lot of players 1 VIU 13 Smart Market Design… ...Food for thought (I) TELL PEOPLE THE TRUTH => no cheap transition TRANSITION DOES NOT MEAN REVOLUTION (even though…) => transition we can afford MAJOR STRUCTURAL CHANGES => +/- 50 Y DIFFERENT POLITICAL CHOICES => Québec vs Europe DEFINE PRIORITIES => clean, sos, cost, comfort, other…? ACCEPT MISTAKES => Denmark NEW PLAYERS => “our” energy landscape is past...!!!! COOPERATION => cannot do it all NEW ASSETS => faster depreciation IMPOSSIBLE IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE... 14 Smart Market Design… ...Food for thought (II) RETHINK PLANNING - LT vision / where & how get there - T&D - generation (for now) NO LONG TERM DESIGN => integrate impact of new techs NEW REGULATION: - no regret investments - new remuneration: - assets, but also services - what about full unbundling - reduce risk of legal challenges 15 16 Agenda B. (Future) New EC Market Design 17 The current market design (20 years from 1st Energy Package) Significant progress has been made but still… National Approaches • • • The energy mix remains a national competence Some parts of Europe remain electricity islands Some Member States have capacity payments Consumers • • Consumers cannot participate High Energy prices Centralised Generation • • • Market based on centralised generation Power market focused on day-ahead market coupling No real integration of RES Security of Supply • Strong external dependency Climate change • Increased CO2 emissions This power market does not correspond to the current reality! 18 Market Design: what to expect? Position of the European Commission 1 Market Rules • Urgent need for integrated Intraday & Balancing Markets • Price signals: Scarcity pricing: no price caps Locational signals: New bidding zones Exit signals 2 Governance • Establishment of Regional Operation Centers (ROC) with decision making powers • Strengthen ENTSOE to ensure stronger TSO cooperation • Enhanced ACER: more decision making powers to supervise Internal Energy Market and ensure cross-border cooperation 3 Interconnections • Strong benefits • New strategy to achieve 15% Interconnection Target 19 Market Design: what to expect? Position of the European Commission 4 Renewables • RES integration: Balancing responsibility No priority dispatch Market based & cost-efficient RES support schemes • Regional approach for RES development: cross-border participation in RES support schemes 5 Regional Cooperation & Security of Supply • Increased coordination and cooperation at EU level needed • Member States to coordinate with neighbors when developing energy plans • Need for regional generation adequacy assessments • Consistent adequacy standards • Capacity Remuneration Mechanisms: Based on regional system adequacy assessment Harmonised design Open to cross-border participation 20 Market Design: conclusions Key upcoming changes Markets - Integrated Intraday & Balancing Markets accelerated - Removal of price caps to allow for scarcity pricing - New bidding zones: reflect physical limitations in grid rather than political borders Governance Grids RES SoS - TSO cooperation and ENTSOE: Establishment of ROC with increased powers - ACER: More resources and possibly some extra decision making powers - 15% Target to be revised - RES integrated in market: balancing responsibility, priority dispatch, long term hedging products - Coordinated support schemes - EU framework for CRMs: Demand response & cross-border participation, avoid dominant positions in concentrated markets - Common approach to assess system adequacy: More cooperation but difficult as SoS has a strong national dimension 21 New Electricity Market Design Timeline 25 Feb 2015 15 Jul – 8 Oct 2015 Energy Union Framework Strategy Consultation on the NEW MARKET DESIGN 18 February 2016 IEA Market Design Report July 2016 EC Impact Assessment July 2016 EP Final Report End 2016: New EC legislative proposals • • • Electricity Directive/Electricity Regulation ACER Regulation Infrastructure Regulation • • • Electricity Security of Supply Directive Energy Efficiency Directive RES Directive 22 23
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz