SPIS-Elena - Tramways in Skåne Light rail day, 8 november 2011 Marcus Horning, project manager, SPIS-Elena Background the SPIS collaboration • Common study (2007). Region Skåne, Malmö, Lund, Helsingborg and the National Railway Administration • Analyzing: • Expected passengers • Economy • City development • Physical conditions in the cities • Environmetal effects • Congestion • Regional development Background the SPIS collaboration • Cooperation is formalized in 2010 with political steering committee • Partners: The Region of Skåne and the cities of Malmö, Lund and Helsingborg, in Sweden. • The SPIS investment programme consists of the coordinated planning and implementation of a new tramway network in Lund, Malmö and Helsingborg. Why joint venture? •Rather small systems in each city •One common system in the future •Common maintenance and operation in the future •Joint procurement – larger volume, better price •The same technique for track and vehicles •The same design principles •The same design guidelines Main projects in the SPIS- collaboration New tramway line in Lund Number of lines: 1 line Number of stops: 9 New trams: 8 New tramway lines in Malmö Number of lines: 2 lines Number of stops: 35 New trams: 23 New tramway line in Helsingborg Number of lines: 1 line Number of stops: 13 New trams: 11 Elena application fall 2010 ELENA application sent to EIB December 2010. May 2011 – application granted •3,3 million euro til May 2014 •90 % Elena 10% divided by all parties •25 times the leverage factor must be met before project period ends - this means an investment of 83 million euro •Main purpose – to achieve energy efficient public transport! Elena application fall 2010 – energy savings 2011 2012 2013 2014 SPIS ELENA SPIS Post-ELENA Energy saving Lund (MWh/yr) Largescale public transport efforts and strategy* Strategic largescale Mobility management* Bus Tram Reduced cartrips Reduced cartrips Total Energy saving Malmö Bus (MWh/yr) Tram Largescale public transport efforts and strategy* Reduced cartrips Strategic largescale Mobility management* Reduced cartrips Total Energy saving Helsingborg Bus (MWh/yr) Tram Largescale public transport efforts and strategy* Reduced cartrips Strategic largescale Mobility management* Reduced cartrips Total TOTAL Energy saving SPIS (MWh/yr) 2015 2019 2020 -3304 819 -10187 -6328 -19000 -10192 3526 -26308 -16343 -49317 -4760 2048 -11909 -7398 -22019 -10743 -15708 -47305 -61583 -90337 -3304 819 -10187 -6328 -19000 -10192 3526 -27693 -17203 -51562 -4760 2048 -12033 -7475 -22219 -92781 -3304 819 -5093 -3164 -10743 2016 2017 2018 -3304 -3304 819 819 -8156 -9688 -5067 -6018 -15708 -18191 -10192 3526 -13846 -8602 -29114 -3304 819 -10187 -6328 -19000 -10192 3526 -22154 -13762 -42583 Delays without ELENA regarding Energy savings Lund Total -10743 -15708 -18191 -19000 -19000 -19000 Malmö Total (opens 2018 instead) -29114 -42583 Helsingborg Total (open 2020 instead) TOTAL Energy savings SPIS (MWh/yr) without ELENA Difference ELENA/without ELENA (percentage) -10743 -15708 100 100 -18191 -19000 -48114 -61583 38 31 53 66 Aims and goals - with SPIS-Elena •Energy efficient light rail in Skane – sustainable development •Optimize the cooperation of the partners involved and the implementation – save time and money •Investigate common questions – create synergy, one plattform •Collectively communicate the project - open source Consortium organisation Tramways in Skane Political steering committee of SPIS Head of chief committe of SPIS WP 1 Project management of SPIS-Elena WP 2 Vehicles WP 3 Financing WP 4 Design WP 5 Maintenance WP 6 Communication Staff and SPIS-office Recruting staff •Project manager (100%) •Controller (50%) •Tendering expert (100%) •Tram expert (100%) •Project strategist (50%) •Communicator (100%) •Project coordinator 1 (100%) •Project coordinator 2 (100%) •Project coordinator 3 (100%) WP 1 Project management of SPIS-Elena Project plan - Content •Coordinate and lead the work •Define administative processes •Budget and timeframe •Reporting •Budget - 142 000 euro WP 2 Vehicles Project plan - Content •Investigate system for – energy, technique, electricity etc •Defining maintence approach •Support for tendering preparation •Tendering •Ordering •Budget - 310 000 euro WP 3 Financing Project plan - Content 1:a kvart 2:a kvart 3:e kvart 4:e kvart 4:e kvart 4:e kvart •Financial strategy •Different financing alternatives •Negotiation package •Successive calculation •Investigation – traffic, stages, financing sources, alternative costs etc •Budget - 180 000 euro WP 4 Design Project plan - Content •Largest package •Links all WPs •Develop common standards – optimize together not seperatly •Define the most energy effective design – support model split to energy efficient public transport •Budget - 950 000 euro WP 5 Maintenance Project plan - Content •Long term package •Joint maintenance system – energy and resource effective life cycle •Innovative quality system – secures a reliable and attracitve system support the modal split •60 000 euro WP 6 Communication Project plan - Content •Joint communication strategy – better effect, exchange of knowledge, effective use of resources •Strategy which connects goals, challanges and opportunites •Communication plans – different target groups •(Budget – 200 000 euro not Elena funding) Time plan 2011 Maj 2012 2013 2014 Juni WP 1 Project managment WP 2 Vehicles WP 3 Finance WP 4 Design WP 5 Maintenance WP 6 Communication Today EIB report Thank you
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz