QUARTER 2 PERFORMANCE REPORT
2015/16 FINANCIAL YEAR
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO
COMMITTEE ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND
LAND REFORM
17 February 2016
1
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
Legend
Strategic Goals
Summary of Quarter 2 Performance
Year-on-year Performance Comparison
Year-on-year Average Quarterly Performance
Programme Performance Description:
 Programme 1: Administration
 Programme 2: Geospatial and Cadastral Services
 Programme 3: Rural Development
 Programme 4: Restitution
 Programme 5: Land Reform
Summary Table
2
THE LEGEND
TARGET ACHIEVED
TARGET PARTIALLY ACHIEVED
TARGET NOT ACHIEVED
95% -100%
On Course, no major action needed.
50% - 94%
Moderate Risk that some problems exist that may
affect achievement of targets. Remedial Action is
required to avoid this.
Certainty, that targets were not achieved. Major
0% - 49%
(less than 50%) Remedial Action and Urgent Intervention is required.
For targets on budget expenditure and invoices paid within 30 days the
achievement must be 100%.
Departmental Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100
Total no of targets set
3
STRATEGIC GOALS
The Department has identified seven strategic goals it seeks to
achieve in the five-year period of its Strategic Plan (2015-20)
and beyond:
1. Foster corporate governance and service excellence.
2. Improve land administration for integrated and sustainable
growth and development.
3. Promote equitable access to and sustainable use of land for
development.
4. Promote sustainable rural livelihoods.
5. Improved access to services.
6. Sustainable rural enterprises and industries.
7. Restoration of Land rights.
4
SUMMARY OF Q2 PERFORMANCE
Achieved
Partially
Achieved
Not
Achieved
Q1 APP targets = 43 of 58
14
8
21
Q2 APP targets = 43 of 58
19
13
11
Mid-year APP targets = 86
36
25
25
Planned Targets
Departmental Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100
Total no of targets set
By end of September 2015, the Department achieved as follows:
 44% of planned targets for Quarter Two, and
 42% of planned targets for Mid-year.
5
MID-YEAR PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE
Performance on Quarter 2, Mid-year and Cumulative
44%
42%
30%
29%
29%
26%
17%
17%
11%
QUARTER 2
MID-YEAR
Achieved
Partially Achieved
CUMULATIVE
Not Achieved
Key Message: Cumulatively, the Department’s performance should be at 46%,
compared to actual performance of 17%.
Cumulative projections: Q1 = 23% >> Q2 = 46% >> Q3 = 71% >> Q4 = 100%.
6
PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS
Programme Performance Comparisons (% Targets Achieved)
100%
78%
67%
42%
38%
67%
40%
33%
29%
25%
21%
PROG 1
PROG 2
PROG 3
PROG 4
Q2
PROG 5
21%
PROG 5.1 (LRD)
20%
20%
PROG 5.2 (LTA)
Mid-year
7
YEAR-ON-YEAR PERFORMANCE COMPARISON
59%
56%
44%
44%
36%
30%
26%
25%
22%
20%
19%
2012/13
2013/14
Achieved
19%
2014/15
Partially Achieved
2015/16
Not Achieved
 Compared to the past three FYs, the Dept. is on an upward trend of 44%, which
equals its highest performance achieved for Q2, last met in the FY 2012/13.
 The performance also represent an improvement on the expected Q2 average
YOY performance of 29% (see next slide).
8
YEAR-ON-YEAR AVERAGE QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE
55%
49%
33%
29%
Quarter 1
Quarter 2
Quarter 3
Quarter 4
 The graph shows typical average YOY performance across the 4 quarters (over the
past three FYs).
 Historically the Dept. has had a strong Q1 performance (50%+), though Q1 of current
FY (33%) was an exception.
 Trends show that Q2 is consistently a slow performing quarter (why is this?), though as
per previous slide, Q2 of current FY represent the best achievement for Q2.
 To make up in quarters 3 and 4, the Dept. needs to over-achieve in order to address
any shortfalls (which will count towards Cumulative and Annual achievements).
9
PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTION
PER PROGRAMME
PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION
PROGRAMME PURPOSE
Provide strategic and logistical support in the form of
executive services, corporate services and the acquisition
of vehicles for departmental use. Oversee departmental
capital works. Provide bursaries to non-employees.
10
PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION
Performance Annual Q1
Q1
Q2
Q2 Variance Explanation of the challenges Planned Interventions to address the Cumulative
Indicator
Target Target Results Target Results
%
leading to the variance
challenges and variance
performance
(Q1 & Q2)
% of
allocated
budget
spent
100 %
25%
15,8%
50%
38,5%
-11,5%
% of valid
invoices
paid within
30 days
upon receipt
by supply
chain
manageme
nt
% of
disciplinary
cases
finalised
within 90
days
100%
100%
81%
100%
86,4%
-13,6%
60%
60%
19%
60%
29%
-31%
Under spending by 11.5%
against the straight line
target due to spending on
Household Transfers of 23.8%
and specifically under
Program: Rural Development
25.9% and Restitution with
20.6% under spending
Rates & Taxes accruals as a
result of lack of budget
System Down time
Expiry of Tax Clearance
Certificates
Provincial Visits to Provinces by DG
& CFO to create awareness of
Financial Performance Deficits.
Monthly IYM Meetings with DM
and Ministry.
38,5%
Surplus retention that is approved
by National Treasury will be used
to pay the invoices
The roll out of the invoice tracking
system in February 2016
The nodal point has been
established
86,4%
Obtaining information from
employees’ offices, with
many documents to be
assessed. The need to
consult with SIU and other
subject experts.
Delays when the submission
was en route for approval.
Unavailability of the
Practitioner and difficulty in
securing a chairperson all
led to the variance.
Further training of chairpersons,
training of labour relations
practitioners.
Managers on the data base of
trained chairpersons will be
instructed to chair disciplinary
proceedings and submit reports
within five days from the date of
conclusion of the hearing.
A panel of external chairpersons
and investigators will be
appointed to deal with the
backlog.
29%
11
PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION (2)
Performance Annual Q1
Q1
Q2
Indicator
Target Target Results Target
% of
vacancies
filled within
120 days
from the
advert date
70%
70%
% network
uptime and
availability
maintained
Number of
media
assessment
reports
submitted
indicating
the
departmen
ts profile in
the
Media.
80%
80% 95,4% 80%
4
1
37%
1
70%
1
Q2
Results
31%
Variance
Explanation of the
%
challenges leading to the
variance
-39%
Unavailability of panel
members resulting in
postponements,
delays in selection
processes, further
delays in obtaining
order numbers for SMS
competency
assessments and preemployment
screening and limited
capacity in capturing
large quantities of
applications
Planned Interventions to address the Cumulative
challenges and variance
performance
(Q1 & Q2)
Branch heads must monitor weekly
progress reports circulated by HRM
and take appropriate action to
ensure managers comply with the
120 days turnaround time. All posts
advertised to date must be filled
by 31 December 2015.
Improve turnaround time in filling
posts within 120 days from date of
advert, failing which responsible
managers must explain why
disciplinary action should not be
instituted against them.
34%
93,8%
+13,8 None
None
93,8%
1 monthly
report
produced
None None
None
2 quarterly
reports
produced
12
PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION (3)
Performance Annual Target
Indicator
Q1 Target
Q1 Results
Q2 Target
Clean audit Clean audit None
opinion
opinion
obtained
No target
Clean
audit
opinion
% of
external
audit
findings
resolved
No target
100%
100%
Financing Financing
Model
Model
approved developed
and
approved
None
Q2 Results
Planned
Interventions to
address the
challenges and
variance
The indicator is
Unqualified Findings Findings and
not part of the
audit
and
emphasis of
2016-2017 APP.
emphasis matter.
This means that
of matter
there is no need
for a planned
intervention.
Project
Monthly follow
89%
-11%
management
up will be done
and
to ensure that
Commitments,
action plans are
still a challenge, adhered to.
training is
scheduled for
Deeds to address
commitments on
GRAPP during
November 2015.
Financing Target
Financing Financing
Model
achieved
Model
Model
developed Financing
developed developed
Model
developed
but awaiting
approval
Variance
%
None
Explanation of
the challenges
leading to the
variance
None
None
Cumulative
performanc
e (Q1 & Q2)
Unqualified
audit
89%
Financing
Model
developed
13
PROGRAMME 1 OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
Administration
9 targets were planned for implementation in the period under review:
 3 targets were achieved,
 4 targets were partially achieved and,
 2 targets were not achieved
Performance = No. of targets achieved x100
Total no of targets
Planned Targets
Q2 APP targets = 9 of 10
Mid-year targets = 16
Target
Achieved
3
Target Partially
Achieved
4
Target Not
Achieved
2
6
6
4
The Administration programme achieved 33% of the targets planned
for implementation in quarter two and 38% Mid-year.
14
PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTION
PER PROGRAMME
PROGRAMME 2: GEOSPATIAL AND
CADASTRAL SERVICES
PROGRAMME PURPOSE
Provide geospatial information, cadastral surveys, deeds
registration and spatial planning, as well as technical
services in support of sustainable land development.
15
PROGRAMME 2: GEOSPATIAL AND CADASTRAL SERVICES
Performance
Indicator
National Spatial
Development
Framework
(NSDF)
developed
Annual
Target
Q1 Target
NSDF
Preliminar
discussion y report
document on
on
thematic
thematic areas
areas and
consultati
on
% of
70% SDFs
municipalities
supported to
implement the
Spatial Planning
and Land Use
Management Act
(SPLUMA)
100%
Q1
Results
Q2 Target Q2 Results Variance
%
Not
Achieve Draft
Draft
d
discussion Achieved discussion
The
document
document
prelimina
ry report
on
thematic
areas is
available
0%
100%
0%
-100%
Explanation of the
challenges leading to
the variance
In Q1, the DRDLR
received a
communication with
proposal to move the
NSDF target to the
Presidency in Q1. The
Interactions that
ensued as well as a
decision that the
target will be comanaged by the
DRDLR and the
Presidency delayed
progress towards
achievement of the
target
N/A
Planned
Interventions to
address the
challenges and
variance
Cumulative
performance
(Q1 & Q2)
A request for
Government
proposals for the structures for
development of the NSDF
the Discussion
developed
Document has
gone through the
SCM process. A
project Plan is
available and the
project is a
standing agenda
item for War Room
which will ensure
partial
achievement of
the target
N/A
0% (-100%)
16
PROGRAMME 2: GEOSPATIAL AND CADASTRAL SERVICES (2)
Performance Annual
Indicator
Target
% of
164
municipalitie
s supported
to
implement
the Spatial
Planning
and Land
Use
Manageme
nt Act
(SPLUMA)
Q1 Target
Q1 Results
Compliance Not
Assessment achieved
undertaken
and report
compiled.
Q2 Target
Issue
Compliance
notices and
Action Plan
for remedial
measures
Q2 Results
Variance
Explanation of the
Planned
challenges leading Interventions to
to the variance
address the
challenges and
variance
Cumulative
performance
(Q1 & Q2)
Partially
-27
The majority of
Underperformin Target Partially
Achieved:
municipalities provincial offices
g provinces
Achieved:
Detailed
achieved this target. have been
Detailed Action
Action Plans
Few provinces did
warned against Plans and
and
not achieve their
nonCompliance
Compliance
targets i.e. SDFs performance
Notices were
Notices were
Limpopo -14,
and nonissued to 134
issued to 137
Gauteng -7 & NW - compliance
Municipalities
out of 164
13
(submission of
out of 164
Municipalities
The following
inadequate
Municipalities
reasons were given PoE). Further
for
engagements (-27
underachievement: are planned
Municipalities)
Gauteng: Gauteng which will
issued compliance include PSSC
notices in June
heads. All
which is out of the
provinces will be
period under review, required to
which means the
submit PoE on
overachieved in
monthly basis to
quarter; NW- Delays ensure effective
of engagement with early warning for
municipalities ; no
underaction on previously performance.
issued compliance
notices.
17
PROGRAMME 2: GEOSPATIAL AND CADASTRAL SERVICES (3)
Performance
Indicator
Annual
Target
% of
municipalitie
s supported
to
implement
the Spatial
Planning
and Land
Use
Manageme
nt Act
(SPLUMA)
40%: Land
Use
Schemes
(93)
Q1 Target
Compliance
Assessment
undertaken
and report
compiled
Q1 Results
Q2 Target
Not
Issue
achieved Complianc
e notices
and Action
Plan on
remedial
measures to
93
municipaliti
es
Q2 Results
Variance Explanation of the
Planned
Cumulative
challenges
Interventions to performance
leading to the
address the
(Q1 & Q2)
variance
challenges and
variance
Partially
-14
Majority of
Underperforming Target Partially
Achieved:
municipa provinces
provinces have Achieved:
Detailed Action lities
achieved their
been warned
Detailed
Plans and
target, only a
against nonAction Plans
Compliance
small number
performance
and
Notices were
underperformed and nonCompliance
issued to 79 out
i.e.
compliance
Notices were
of 93
Limpopo -6,
(submission of
issued to 78
Municipalities.
Gauteng -4 & NW inadequate
Municipalities
-8. The following PoE). Further
out of 93
reasons were
engagements
Municipalities.
provided for
are planned
underperformanc which will include (-14
e: some
PSSC heads. All municipalities)
municipalities are provinces will be
yet to implement required to
actions plans that submit PoE on
were issued in the monthly basis to
previous cycle
ensure effective
and others are
early warning for
currently
underdeveloping Land performance.
Use Schemes and
as a result they
could not be
issued with actions
plans. There were
also problems with
incomplete PoE.
18
PROGRAMME 2: GEOSPATIAL AND CADASTRAL SERVICES (4)
Performance
Indicator
Annual
Target
Variance Explanation of the
Planned
Cumulative
%
challenges
Interventions to performance (Q1 &
leading to the
address the
Q2)
variance
challenges and
variance
% of
90%
Provide 78%
Provide 60% Taget Achieved: 9%
None
None
69% Municipalities
municipalitie Function 30% with municipalities with generic (69%). Total of 144
were assisted with
s supported al Land generic have been
tools for
Local and District
generic tools for
to implement Use
tools for provided
Land Use
Municipalities
land use regulators
the Spatial
Regulato Land Use with generic Regulator were assisted with
(model bylaws,
Planning and rs (210) Regulato tools for Land
generic tools for
customised bylaws,
Land Use
rs
Use
land use
gazettes).
Managemen
Regulators
regulators (model
t Act
bylaws,
(SPLUMA)
customised
bylaws, gazettes).
Number of
27
District Rural
Developmen
t Plans
completed
Q1
Target
Q1 Results
Draft
Not
district
achieved
rural
develop
ment
plans
Q2 Target
Q2 Results
Consultation Target Achieved: None
Consultations
were conducted
for 27 District
Municipalities
(WC =1 DM; NC
=1 DM; EC =5
DMs; FS =1 DM;
MP = 1 DM; KZN =
10 DMs; NW=3
DMs; LP = 5 DMs.
None
None
Consultations were
conducted for 27
District
Municipalities (WC
=1 DM; NC =1 DM;
EC =5 DMs; FS =1
DM; MP = 1 DM;
KZN = 10 DMs;
NW=3 DMs; LP = 5
DMs.
19
PROGRAMME 2: GEOSPATIAL AND CADASTRAL SERVICES (5)
Performance Annual Q1 Target Q1 Results
Indicator
Target
Number of
2 (NW,
provinces
GP)
supported to
develop
Provincial
SDFs
Number of
State
Domestic
Facilities
(SDFs)
surveyed
1,200
Complian 2 (NW, GP)
ce
Compliance
assessme assessment
nt
undertaken
undertake and report
n and
compiled.
report
compiled
for (NW,
GP)
150
77
Q2 Target
Issue
compliance
notices and
action plan
for remedial
measures to
six provinces
400
Q2 Results Variance
Explanation of the Planned Interventions to
challenges
address the challenges
leading to the
and variance
variance
Target
-Compliance
partially notices and
achied:
action plan
NorthWest for remedial
:
measures for
Complien Gauteng
ce notices PSDF.
develope
d on PSDF
Gauteng SPLUMs
indicated that
they've had
problems in their
interaction with
the Province of
Gauteng
regarding the
Provincial Spatial
Development
Framework
(PSDF).
Utilise service
providers, funds
were only
available
towards the
end of the
quarter, thus
affecting
performance.
150
-250
Cumulative
performance
(Q1 & Q2)
An engagement was held Target
between the SDC and the partiallyDirector SPLUMS Gauteng achieved.
to address the reasons for
non-performance and
(Gauteng)
non-compliance. This
matter will be escalated to
PSSC head to assist in the
engagements with
Gauteng Province
(Premier’s office).
There is an internal
strategy in place to
catch-up on
performance.
227 (-323)
Adjudication of 28
blocks, comprising 770
SDFs has been
completed.
28 purchase order have
been generated
(appointment of land
surveyor). Adjudication
of further blocks is
underway.
20
PROGRAMME 2: GEOSPATIAL AND CADASTRAL SERVICES (6)
Performance
Indicator
Annual
Target
Q1
Target
Q1
Results
Number of 967,725 232,88 249,325
deeds and
3
documents
registered
57%
% of Deeds 95%
95%
made
available
within 7
days from
lodgement
to
execution
Q2
Target
256,
583
95%
Q2
Variance Explanation of the challenges Planned Interventions to
Results
%
leading to the variance
address the challenges and
variance
258,165 1,582 A higher number of
73%
lodgments was received
in the period under
review.
-22% Variance due to
increased lodgments
on some days (an
exception) received in
offices.
The following offices
experienced backlogs
in registration: PMB, CPT
& JHB which affected
turn-around times.
The other reason is that
some deeds remain in
the DRS tracking system
for longer than 60 days,
making it appear as
though offices make
fewer deeds available
for registration.
None
Offices that receive
high volumes of
lodgments increase
resource capacity in
affected critical
operational sections.
Cumulative
performance
(Q1 & Q2
507,490
73%
Correct this problem
through DRSS system
configuration and
ensure that deeds
reflecting in the Deeds
Office Tracking System
(DOTS) longer than 60
days are cleaned up.
This is however, a more
long term plan and
work has already
begun with OCIO.
21
PROGRAMME 2: GEOSPATIAL AND CADASTRAL SERVICES (7)
Performance
Indicator
Number of maps of
the national map
series produced/
reviewed.
Annual
Target
Q1 Target
Q1 Results
197
50
61
51
83
32
13.5
14
12
-2
None
N/A
None
None
Average number of
14
14
working days taken
to process
registerable
diagrams, sectional
plans and general
plans.
Number of sets of
Enterprise Enterprise
solution modules
architectu architecture
deployed
re
available
available
Q2 Target Q2 Results Variance Explanation of
the challenges
leading to the
variance
No Target
Not
achieved.
The request
for EA work
was
completed
and
submitted
to SITA.
Delivery has
been
placed on
hold
None
Planned
Cumulative
Interventions to performance
address the
(Q1 & Q2)
challenges and
variance
None
144
None
12
None
Not achieved.
The request for
EA work was
completed
and submitted
to SITA. Delivery
has been
placed on hold
22
PROGRAMME 2 OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
Geospatial and Cadastral Services
12 targets were planned for implementation in the period under review:
 5 target were achieved,
 4 targets were partially achieved, and
 3 targets were not achieved.
Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100
Total no of targets
Planned Targets
Target
Achieved
Target Partially
Achieved
Target Not
Achieved
Q2 APP targets = 12 of 13
5
4
3
Mid-year APP targets = 25
10
9
6
The Geospatial and Cadastral programme achieved 42% of the
targets planned for implementation in quarter two and 40% Mid-year.
23
PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE
DESCRIPTION
PROGRAMME 3: RURAL DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAMME PURPOSE
Initiate, facilitate, coordinate and act as a catalyst for the
implementation of comprehensive rural development
programme leading to sustainable and vibrant rural
communities.
24
PROGRAMME 3: RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Performance
Indicator
Annual
Q1
Q1
Q2
Target Target Results Target
5
0
Q2
Results
Variance Explanation of the challenges Planned Interventions to
leading to the variance
address the challenges and
variance
This is a new indicator and it Realignment of targets
5
was envisaged that 5
finalised urgently and
projects could be delivered projects were submitted to
in light of some possible
projects approval
carry-through projects.
committee (PAC) in Q1.
Number of
projects
implemented in
rural communities
to improve
production, in
support of
improved food
security
30
Number of socio
economic
infrastructure
projects
coordinated
Number of
Animal Veld
Management
Programme
projects
implemented
Number of
projects
implemented in
support of the
River Valley
Catalytic
Programme
80
10
18
15
26
11
250
30
22
50
59
9
20
No
Target
7
No
Target
2
N/A
10
15
Those were however not
aligned to this new indicator
and provinces thus did not
target accordingly.
2014/15 FY Carry over
None
projects completed in
2015/16 FY.
Cumulative
performance
(Q1 & Q2)
15
44
None
Finalisation of assessments.
81 (-8)
Various AVMP projects were
approved at PAC.
Fast track the appointment
of Strategic Partners.
N/A
N/A
9
25
PROGRAMME 3: RURAL DEVELOPMENT (2)
Performance
Indicator
Number of
rural
enterprises
supported in
rural
development
initiatives
with special
focus on 27
District
Municipalities
Annual Q1
Q1 Q2 Target Q2 Variance Explanation of the challenges
Target Target Results
Results
leading to the variance
215
40
16
60
20
-40
Delivery for some projects
approved in the 2nd is only
expected in the 3rd quarter.
31 Projects were supported
that are not contributing to
the APP target, but
supporting existing
enterprises.
Planned Interventions to
address the challenges
and variance
Cumulative
performance
(Q1 & Q2)
Projects targeted for 36 (-64)
Q3 are approved and
are in various stages
of implementation
and planned to be
delivered in Q3.
This will require close
monitoring and
tracking to ensure
Effect of transition to method delivery as planned.
of direct sourcing and not
through SLAs still had an
Finalise standard TOR
impact on readiness for
for procurement of
delivery in Q2.
REID specific inputs for
enterprises and a
Under-targeting for Q2, and Standard Operating
some projects submitted for Procedure to assist
PoE equal initial support in
fast tracking of
terms of business plans for the procurement
enterprise and are not yet
processes and
qualifying as support.
delivery thereof.
26
PROGRAMME 3 : RURAL DEVELOPMENT (3)
Performance
Indicator
Annual Q1
Target Target
Number of skills
4,500
development
opportunities
provided to support
rural
development
initiatives
Number of skills
2,500
development
opportunities
provided to
NARYSEC youth
Number of jobs
8,000
created in rural
development
initiatives
Q1 Results
300
Total: 1,499
REID: 1,000
RID: 499
No
Target
779
1,000
Total: 1,268
REID: 650
RID: 618
Q2
Target
500
Q2 Results
Total: 3,196
REID: 2,306
RID: 890
No 756
Target
1,500 Total: 1,218
REID: 312
RID: 906
Variance
2,696
N/A
-282
Explanation of the
challenges leading to
the variance
Planned
Interventions to
address the
challenges and
variance
2014/15 FY Carry over N/A
projects completed in
2015/16 FY.
Some Projects have
more members which
increased the number
of people trained
Some provinces were N/A
able to provide
training opportunities
due to improved
planning.
More job
REID: Ensure all
opportunities were
preparations are in
presented in projects place for delivery
for RID.
of working
However, under REID equipment to be
under performance of delivered and
enterprises, job
monitor
opportunities in most implementation.
of the projects will kick Quantify job
start in the 3rd quarter. opportunities to be
created through
enterprise
development and
Identify additional
opportunities as
required
Cumulative
performance
(Q1 & Q2)
TOTAL: 4,695
REID: 3,306
RID: 1,389
1,535
Total: 2,486
REID: 962
RID: 1,524
27
PROGRAMME 3 OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
Rural Development
6 targets were planned for implementation in the period under review:
 4 targets were achieved,
 1 target was partially achieved,
 1 target were not achieved.
Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100
Total no of targets
Planned Targets
Target
Achieved
Target Partially
Achieved
Target Not
Achieved
Q2 APP targets = 6 of 14
4
1
1
Mid-year APP targets = 12
8
2
2
The Rural Development programme achieved 67% to date of the
targets planned for implementation in quarter two and 67% Mid-year.
28
PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE
DESCRIPTION
PROGRAMME 4: RESTITUTION
PROGRAMME PURPOSE
Settle and finalize land restitution claims under the
Restitution of Land Rights Act (Act 22 of 1994)
29
PROGRAMME 4: RESTITUTION
Performance
Indicator
Annual
Target
Q1 Target
Q1
Results
Q2
Target
Q2 Results
Number of land
claims settled
463
92
38
139
146
Number of land
claims finalised
373
74
57
111
130
19
None.
None.
187
Number of
phased projects
approved
62
12
8
18
24
6
None
None
32
2660
532
195
798
782
-16
None
None
977 (-353)
2 allterrain
(4x4)
mobile
lodgeme
nt
offices
operatio
nal
2 all-terrain
(4x4)
mobile
lodgement
offices
operational
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
4x4 Mobile
offices
registered and
successfully
rolled out in
North West and
Northern Cape.
Roll out to all
provinces
managed
through project
manager.
Number of claims
lodged by 1998 to
be researched
Number of
Lodgement
Offices
operational
No
4x4 Mobile
Target offices
registered and
successfully
rolled out in
North West and
Northern Cape.
Roll out to all
provinces
managed
through project
manager.
Variance Explanation of the Planned
challenges leading Interventions to
to the variance
address the
challenges and
variance
None
None
7
Cumulative
performance
(Q1 & Q2)
184 (-47)
30
PROGRAMME 4 OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
Restitution
4 targets were planned for implementation in the period under review:
 All the 4 targets were achieved.
Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100
Total no of targets
Planned Targets
Target
Achieved
Target Partially
Achieved
Target Not
Achieved
Q2 APP targets = 4 of 5
4
0
0
Mid-year APP targets = 9
7
2
0
The Restitution programme achieved 100% of the targets planned
for implementation in quarter two and 78% Mid-year.
31
PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE
DESCRIPTION
PROGRAMME 5: LAND REFORM
PROGRAMME PURPOSE
Initiate sustainable land reform programmes in South
Africa.
32
PROGRAMME 5: LAND REFORM - LRD
Performance Annual Q1
Indicator
Target Target
Number of
hectares
acquired
Q1 Results
Explanation of the
challenges leading to the
variance
-40,190.67
71,579.67
a)
Time
laps
between
370,000 77,714 24,162.40
111,769ha
ha
NLARCC
/MCM
Redistribution:
Redistributi
approval /Concurrence
10930.0393ha
on:
44
and land transfers.
Restitution:
630.67
13232.1072ha
b) Delays in the
finalization of land
Restitution:
valuations and land
26,949
offers.
c) R 275m shifted from
PLAS land acquisition
without considering the
revision of targets.
Targets were revised
based on this budget
shift to 203 000 and
quarter two targets
revised from 111 769 ha
to 75 526 ha.
Number of
185,000 35,243 4,197
hectares
allocated to
smallholder
farmers
Q2 Target Q2 Results Variance
Planned Interventions to
address the challenges and
variance
The team, lead by Chief
Directors within the Branch is
tasked to assist Provinces
on:
Unblocking the blockages
(Speed-up the appointment
of conveyancers including
packaging of submissions
(memos) inline with the APP
targets)
Utilization of the update
Panel of valuers
Office of the Valuer General
to improve the turnaround
time on and issuing of land
offers after valuations
Approval of the revised APP
after the budget shift to
support Agri-Parks
a)
Planning
and
Develop a new
-16, 332
reporting on the
standardized memorandum
Allocation of Hectares to for approval, define
smallholder farmers is
smallholder farmers in order
derived from the MTSF
to improve the Portfolio of
target of 2m ha of
Evidence
which 50% must be
allocated to Smallholder
farmers, and therefore
the annual target of
hectares acquired, 50%
must be allocated to
smallholder farmers.
Cumulative
performance
(Q1 & Q2)
95 742.07 ha
(-93,741.07)
50,663ha 34,331ha
38,528 ha
(-47,378)
33
PROGRAMME 5: LAND REFORM – LRD (2)
Performance
Indicator
Annual
Q1
Q1
Q2
Target Target Results Target
Q2
Results
Number of
37,000
hectares allocated
to farm dwellers
and labour tenants
7,891
0
13,128h
a
0
Number of District
Land Committees
established
Number of farms
acquired to
support Agri-Parks
27
No
Target
0
No
Target
28
27
No
Target
0
No
Target
16
Variance
Explanation of the Planned Interventions to address Cumulative
challenges leading
the challenges and variance
performance
to the variance
(Q1 & Q2)
• A number of projects have -21,019ha
-13,128ha • Time laps
between
been approved by
NLARCC /MCM
NLARCC and endorsed by
approval
MCM during the 2nd
/Concurrence
quarter but the transfer
and land
process has not been
transfers of the
finalised and project are
tenure reform
at different stages of
related projects
being transferred
• All MCM endorsed projects
• Focusing more
during the 2nd quarter to
on acquisition
be transferred during the
rather than
3rd quarter. This will amount
identifying
to an expenditure of R23
farms already
981 061 and allocation of
bought through
3432 hectares
PLAS and Court • Provinces to identify farms
Decision
bought through PLAS for
disposals to farm dwellers
and labour tenants.
N/A
N/A
N/A
28
N/A
N/A
N/A
16
34
PROGRAMME 5: LAND REFORM – LRD (3)
Performance Indicator
Number of PLAS farms
identified for the
incubation and training
of agricultural graduates
Number of pilot projects
on Policy on
Strengthening Relative
Rights
Number of farms under
the Recapitalisation and
Development
Programme
Annual
Target
13
Q1
Q1
Q2
Q2 Variance Explanation of the Planned Interventions to Cumulative
Target Results Target Results
challenges leading address the challenges performance
to the variance
and variance
(Q1 & Q2)
No
0
No
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
Target
target
10
No
Target
0
No
Target
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
331
82
36
83
61
-22
a) Delays in
packaging of
payments after
NLARCC /MCM
approval
/Concurrence
b)Delays in
processing of
payments due to
the non
compliance by
SP/Beneficiaries
in submitting the
invoices
c) Delays in
signing of the
new Recap
contracts.
The team, lead by
Chief Directors within
the Branch is tasked to
assist Provinces on:
• Unblocking the
blockages (Ensure
compliance of
submissions including
signing of contracts
and Reconciliation of
invoices).
•Projects with SP and
beneficiaries that are
non compliance with
the reconciliation will
be removed from the
projections.
N/A
97 (-68)
35
PROGRAMME 5: LAND REFORM - LRD (4)
Performance
Indicator
Annual Q1
Q1
Q2
Q2 Variance Explanation of the challenges
Target Target Results Target Results
leading to the variance
Number of farmers
trained through the
Recapitalisation
and Development
programme
994
248
151
248
255 7
Currently there is no proper
system to report On-farm
training provided by the
strategic farmers.
Number of jobs
created in land
reform projects
through the
Recapitalisation
and Development
programme
994
248
659
248
670 422
Number of farms
under
Recapitalisation
and Development
Programme
allocated to
smallholder farmers
165
61
0
62
The inclusion of the Jobs
Created by other Land Reform
Projects than those that are
targeted this financial year.
Farmers were preparing for the
planting season hence the
demand of labour resulted in
more jobs created.
Temporary Infrastructure
development (Fencing)
Smallholder farmers are
Recapitalized but the
memorandums of approval are
not defining the smallholder
farmers.
3
-59
Planned Interventions to Cumulative
address the challenges performance
and variance
(Q1 & Q2)
To improve the
reporting templates,
systems and tools to
enable reporting on
both formal and
informal training by
strategic partners
and training
institutions.
Align performance
with the targets
406 (-90)
Develop a new
standardized
memorandum for
approval, define
smallholder farmers
in order to improve
the Portfolio of
Evidence.
-120
1,329
36
LRD OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
Land Reform - LRD
7 targets planned for implementation in the period under review:
 2 targets were achieved,
 3 targets were partially achieved, and
 2 targets were not achieved.
Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100
Total no of targets
Planned Targets
Target
Achieved
Target Partially
Achieved
Target Not
Achieved
Q2 APP targets = 7 of 11
2
3
2
Mid-year APP targets = 14
3
5
6
The Land Reform - LRD programme achieved 29% of the targets
planned for implementation in quarter two and 21% Mid-year.
37
PROGRAMME 5: LAND REFORM - LTA
Performance
Indicator
Number of
Communal
Property
Associations
supported
to be
compliant
with
legislation.
Annual
Q1
Q1
Q2
Q2 Variance Explanation of the challenges
Target Target Results Target Results
leading to the variance
200
50
0
50
25
-25
Planned Interventions to address
the challenges and variance
Cumulative
performanc
e (Q1 & Q2)
• A lot of CPA have been
• CPA have serious
-75
conflicts and
supported and are in
governance issues which different stages of
takes long to resolve.
regularisation
• Provinces to immediately
• Mostly the challenges are identify 5 less complicated
community conflicts
CPA’s that can be
which usually end up in
regularize immediately
courts.
through LRMF.
• Training of 134
implementers conducted
in different provinces
• 14 CPA Executive
members trained on
governance(NW13 and
EC1).
• 65 CPAs pending in the
regularisation process
through LRMF.
38
PROGRAMME 5: LAND REFORM - LTA (2)
Performance
Indicator
Number of
labour
tenants
applications
settled
%
Complete
Immovable
Asset
Register
Annual
Q1
Q1
Q2
Q2 Variance Explanation of the challenges
Target Target Results Target Results
leading to the variance
137
33
0
34
0
-34
Lack of proper implementation
of policy and resources to
settle/finalize labour tenant
applications.
1. Capacity constraint due to
the migration. Only Directors
and DD were approved and
prioritised.
2. Process of disposing land
from PLAS underway but
taking longer due to this
process being new.
3. Follow up on NLARC and
MCM decisions. Some
decisions have gone
missing(Memo not returning
in time to Provinces)
4. Systems and Procedures
recently refined following
the new policy direction.
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% None None
Planned Interventions to
address the challenges and
variance
Cumulative
performance
(Q1 & Q2)
Some staff appointments
-67
were made but still not
enough due to the flaws in
the structural design. Only
Directors and DD were
approved and prioritised
None
100%
39
PROGRAMME 5: LAND REFORM - LTA (3)
Performance
Indicator
Number of
TRANCRAA
projects
(Transformati
on of Certain
Rural Areas
Act)
supported
towards
transfers.
Number of
State Land
Parcels
confirmed as
vested.
Annual Q1 Q1 Results Q2
Q2 Results Variance Explanation of the challenges
Target Target
Target
leading to the variance
7
1
0
2,625
553
191
2
0
620 278
EC –64
KZN– 65
LIM – 45
MPU- 25
NW – 79
-2
-342
Planned Interventions to
address the challenges
and variance
Cumulative
performance
(Q1 & Q2)
• All TRANCRAA
The finalisation of these
-3
projects are being
projects is long. There are
supported, however
issues with the legislation itself
they have not yet
(section 2) – Communities do
been finalised.
not want the land to be
• One Project,
vested with Municipalities.
Ebenhaezer will be
They also want development
transferred in Q3.
before the actual transfer of
•
The remaining will
the land.
be transferred in Q4
The APP targets have been Awaiting approval of 469 (-704)
reviewed to correspond with the reviewed target
actual targets from PSSCs but
still awaiting approval.
Eastern Cape and
North West to expedite
Notwithstanding this
finalisation of their
discrepancy, there still would outstanding targets
be a variance of 79 on
reviewed figures.
40
LTA OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
Land Reform - LTA
5 targets were planned for implementation in the period under review:
 1 target was achieved,
 1 target was partially achieved, and
 3 targets were not achieved.
Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100
Total no of targets
Planned Targets
Target Achieved
Target Partially
Achieved
Target Not
Achieved
Q2 APP targets = 5 of 5
1
1
3
Mid-year APP targets = 10
2
1
7
The Land Reform - LTA programme achieved 20% of the targets
planned for implementation in quarter two and 20% Mid-year.
41
PROGRAMME 5 OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
Land Reform
12 targets planned for implementation in the period under review:
 3 targets were achieved,
 3 targets that were partially achieved, and
 6 targets were not achieved.
Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100
Total no of targets
Planned Targets
Target
Achieved
Target Partially
Achieved
Target Not
Achieved
Q2 APP targets = 12 of 16
3
4
5
Mid-year APP targets = 24
5
6
13
The Land Reform programme achieved 25% of the targets planned for
implementation in quarter two and 21% Mid-year.
42
OVERALL PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
 The Department achieved 44% of the targets planned for
implementation in quarter two and 42% cumulatively.
Table 1: Quarter 2 and cumulative non-financial performance per programme (APP indicators)
NATIONAL
Programmes
APP Targets
for 20152016
Targets
Planned
Q2
Targets
Achieve
d Q2
Performan
ce Rating
Q2
Targets
Planned
Mid-Year
Mid-Year
Performance
Achieved
Performanc
e Rating
Mid-Year
10
13
9
12
3
5
33%
42%
16
25
6
10
38%
40%
Rural Development
Restitution
Land Redistribution
and Development
14
6
4
67%
12
8
67%
5
11
4
7
4
2
100%
29%
9
14
7
3
78%
21%
Land Tenure and
Administration
5
5
1
20%
10
2
20%
58
43
19
44%
86
36
42%
Administration
Geospatial and
Cadastral Services
Overall Total
43
WAY-FORWARD
 Unless the Department starts over-achieving from Q3, it
stands a high risk of missing its overall annual targets.
 Concerted efforts from all stakeholders is required to turn
around the current status quo.
 All Action plans and/or Turn-around strategies developed
in Q1 and Q2 needs to be fully implemented, tracked and
monitored.
 Branches needs to take pro-active action in ensuring that
all POEs are inline with the TIDs to avoid unnecessary
back-and-forth during verifications and validations.
44
THANK YOU
45